Will A Confluence Of Known Terrorists Jumping To Huma Abedin’s Defense (Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff) Hit Critical Mass? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Let us contemplate the following scenario : a laundry list of ‘who’s who’ in Mafia circles, recommends ‘so and so’ for the position of Chief Operations Officer/Chief Financial Officer for a mega national/international conglomerate, or for any legitimate going concern. Would they get hired?

From this blogger’s considerable time spent in corporate tax (recall, this is how ‘following the jihadi money’ described herein started –  https://adinakutnicki.com/about/ ) interfacing with this ‘COO or that CFO’, such a scenario would never happen, unless the job description entailed ‘chief gangster’.

Head hunters – and am not referring to the head chopping kind – eschew any whiff of tainted backgrounds, even if tangentially revealed. After all, there is such a concept as ‘due diligence’, and most business types take it very seriously, even if scoundrels still manage to enter their workplaces.

The basic standard of ‘due diligence’ is most definitely not being adhered to in the ‘People’s House’. ( what kind of slipshod organization are they running in Washington? are they hiring counter clerks in any old convenience store? even ‘mom and pop’ stores want to make sure their employees aren’t going to rob them blind ). The semblance of any such vetting – through required investigations – should be a minimum standard to adhere to, particularly with the stakes as high as they are.

Obviously (as the following will demonstrate), background checks are tossed aside –  two sheets to the wind – akin to the unfazed attitude of alcoholics, as they survey their wreckage with nary a care in the world, sidestepping over their destruction in the process.

Is this any way to run a government, especially one which is hailed as the leadership of the free world?

Standards, what’s that? Due diligence, which schmuck adheres to such an outmoded concept?

And, so it unfolds that Secretary of State Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin , is ( currently ) less than three ( no longer six)  degrees separated from well known terrorists!

You got that?

Even Houdini couldn’t have wiggled himself out of such highly connected (terror) contortions. Nevertheless, poobahs in Washington are still defaming the bearers of truthful tidings, instead of securing the national interest! Mea culpas? Never gonna happen. Mind you, the forthcoming ‘news’ should have been uncovered through proper vetting.

No matter. Stalwart patriots are performing the heavy lifting, hoping to bury her chances of staying put, but only through extreme pressure points.

Many of the building blocks, sealing shut the case against her, are featured at this blog. ‘Uncovering The Tip Of Huma Abedin’s Islamic Spear….The House of Al-Saud’ is the final block of cement –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/16/uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-islamic-spear-the-house-of-al-saud-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

However, the foundation of the indictment against her – the initial building blocks – are found here – ‘The Muslim Student Association (MSA)…Islamic Student Arm Of Muslim Brotherhood/Muslim Mafia…Huma Abedin Board Member Too…What Does This Mean?’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/the-muslim-student-association-msa-islamic-student-arm-of-muslim-brotherhoodmuslim-mafia-huma-abedin-board-member-too-what-does-this-meancommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And, here US government fools are exposed as knaves – ‘Huma Abedin’s Supporters Will Have Nowhere To Hide…Creeping Closer & Closer To (Figuratively) Crucifying Their Position…As They Stand By Their (Islamic) Woman’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/05/huma-abedins-supporters-will-have-nowhere-to-hide-creeping-closer-closer-to-figuratively-crucifying-their-position-as-they-stand-by-their-islamic-woman/,

Enter ‘Madame Secretary’ …..in all her brazen chutzpah… defending her ‘close’ associate – ‘Hillary Clinton’s Tap Dance Around Huma Abedin’s Brotherhood/Sisterhood Connections…And Media Matters Request-Show Us Her Security Clearance!’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/03/hillary-clintons-tap-dance-around-huma-abedins-brotherhoodsisterhood-connections-media-matters-request-show-us-her-security-clearance-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Notice how terror ties run in families..sort of like dominant genes…‘UPDATE : Huma Abedin’s Familial Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood Tree Gains Another Root’ https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/update-huma-abedins-familial-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood-tree-gains-another-root-addendum-to-huma-abedin-deputy-cos-to-hillary-clinton-inextricably-tied-to-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood/.

And, Huma’s terror train continues unimpeded – ‘Huma Abedin, Deputy COS To Clinton INEXTRICABLY Tied To The Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood (embedded report)’https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/24/huma-abedin-deputy-cos-to-hillary-clinton-inextricably-tied-to-the-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood-embedded-report-addendum-tosenator-mccain-digs-himself-into-a-hole-via-his-indefensiblein/, leaving no doubt where her allegiance lies.

Consequentially, Senator John McCain ( what the hell is wrong with him? ) wades into the fray via ‘Senator John McCain Digs Himself Into A Hole…Via His Indefensible/Inexplicable Inexplicable Support Of Huma Abedin…Hillary Clinton’s Deeply Connected Muslim Brotherhood ‘Sister’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/20/senator-john-mccain-digs-himself-into-a-hole-via-his-indefensibleinexplicable-support-of-huma-abedin-hillary-clintons-deeply-connected-muslim-brotherhood-sister-commentary-by-adina-kutnick-132-2/.

Now that Huma’s terror dots have been irrefutably established, what will her Washington defenders (and others) do with more ‘news’ on the horizon? In other words, with actual terrorists coming out in her defense, how will their indefensible defense of her become reconcilable?

Is this writer making herself clear? If not, Walid Shoebat ( a reformed Muslim Brotherhood operative/terrorist, who dedicates his life to exposing their ‘grand jihad’ plans ) should seal her fate within the US, and (hopefully) those who continue to defend her!

‘Another Huma Abedin Defender With An Interesting Background?’ 

“The list of individuals who have publicly defended Huma Abedin – willfully blind Republican politicians like John McCain, John Boehner, Scott Brown, Marco Rubio, Jim Sensenbrenner, and Mike Simspson notwithstanding – may be telling us something all by itself.”

“In the meantime, another defender of Huma’s honor is a woman named Amina Chaudary, who wrote a piece last week called, “We’re all Huma Abedins”. At the bottom of this post, we’ll explain Chaudary’s relevance (stick with us – it’s worth it)………”

“Where do we begin? As has been the case with all those who have come to Huma’s aid in response to the letters penned by Reps. Bachmann, et. al., a faulty premise is used to craft a ridiculous narrative. That premise is that Huma is being unjustly attacked because she’s Muslim. The truth is that the concerns raised have to do not with Abedin’s religion but with her associations, which are SUPPOSED to matter in issues related to granting someone a security clearance, especially at the level where Huma currently works (Hillary’s closest aid).”

“Moreover, Huma’s most ardent defenders also seem to leave clues behind that actually make them appear as less than good character references. For example, have a look at what Chaudary writes in attempt to prove her point:”

While this is the first time such accusations have been leveled against Abedin in a public forum, it is not the first time guilt-by-association tactics have scuttled the promising political careers of American Muslims. Some may recall in the early days of the Obama campaign Mazen Asbahi, an American Muslim lawyer, was appointed by the campaign to undertake outreach to the American Muslim community. Within days, Asbahi was forced to resign due to guilt-by-association relationships with certain individuals, none of whom was ever convicted or indicted for criminal activity in a court of law.The Obama administration feared a distraction, and Asbahi was forced to resign. He, and others like him, would never be able to garner the widespread support for Abedin. Perhaps this is why demonizing American Muslim politicians has become all too common. For the rest of us, gaining widespread support and defense of high-ranking officials in similar scenarios is unheard of.

“Mazen Asbahi? Chaudary went there?”

“Pssst. Amina, not a good idea.”

“For starters, Asbahi was jettisoned once it became learned that he had ties to aradical Imam from Chicago named Jamal Said, who has distinct ties to Hamas. The Wall Street Journal reported that Asbahi served on a Board with Said. Not only that, but when Walid was a Muslim Brotherhood activist in Chicago, Said was his trainer; Walid confirms Said’s nefarious agenda with his firsthand account.”

“By pointing to the Asbahi case, Chaudary introduces another name into the discussion – Ahmed Rehab, the Executive Director for the Chicago office of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Like CAIR, Said was listed as anunindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial.”

“Incidentally, Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly interviewed Rehab in August of 2008, shortly after Asbahi resigned. Note how Rehab actually defends Jamal Said in addition to Asbahi:”

“Obviously, Rehab knows about Asbahi’s relationship with Said. In fact, he actually defends it by praising Said as “a great American faith leader”.

“As for Chaudary, are we supposed to believe that she doesn’t know about Asbahi’s connection to Jamal Said? Doesn’t care? Thinks it’s a good thing? Does she hold the same opinion of Said that Rehab does? If so, that is a person Abedin may not want in her corner.”

“Again, Chaudary conflates two completely separate things and isn’t challenged for doing so; being denied a security clearance / job in a Presidential administration because of associations is not even remotely similar to being convicted of a crime for having certain associations. The former is completely legitimate; the latter is unjust. Yet, Chaudary wants you to believe Huma Abedin is a victim of guilt by association. Huma’s not been proven guilty but it’s looking more and more like she should be disqualified from holding the position of Deputy Chief of Staff for the Secretary of State. It’s an apples and oranges argument on the part of Chaudary and every Huma defender that media outlets – on both the left and the right – continue to let go.”

“As for why Amina Chaudary’s defense of Huma Abedin might be a point of interest…”

“As we learned a few days ago, Huma served on the Board of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at George Washington University (GWU) as recently as August of 1997. As far back as January of 1999, a woman namedAmina Chaudary is listed as that chapter’s Vice-President (her name remained on the Board until at least June of 2000). Is the Amina Chaudary who served on the same Board at MSA GWU (that Huma did one year earlier) the same Amina Chaudary that is defending Huma today? Do the two women know each other? If so, did they meet through the MSA?”

“Here again, is the screen shot of the MSA GWU Board from August of 1997. Notice the last name of the President at the time – Aisha Chaudary. Do Aisha and Amina know each other? Are they related? After all, we ARE talking about the same MSA GWU Board that welcomed Anwar al-Awlaki onto its Board as a “Chaplain” in late 2001.”

“Such associations do matter when we’re talking about national security.”


Still not convinced? Go to – ‘Successors at MSA Board Huma Served On At GWU Include Al-Qaeda Terrorist, IIRO  Leader’ – http://www.shoebat.com/2012/08/18/successors-at-msa-board-huma-served-on-at-gwu-include-al-qaeda-terrorist-iiro-leader/.

Could it get any worse? Nope.

BOTTOM LINE – if one serves as an Editor at any organization which has proven ! terrorists on their Board, the only conclusion ( at the very least ) drawn must be – said person has the same philosophical/ideological outlook as the terror-tied members/founders.

And, the company one keeps surely ( at a minimum ) is one measure of said person’s ‘interests’.

Therefore, within any realm of civilized society, Huma Abedin is ( if one is in a OVERLY generous mood ) a Muslim Brotherhood ‘sympathizer’, or more than likely one of their MAIN operatives.

Sach ha’kol – at the end of it all – what are American patriots going to do about it? Will they swamp their Congressional reps to take action against her?

I am doing my part. Will you do yours?