Benghazigate’s Practiced Liars…Via A Long & Bloody History…Addendum To: The Nexus Between Cover Ups…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Not unlike garden variety criminals government thugs generally leave a trail, but hardly wake up one morning and aim for broke. They start incrementally by testing the waters, gradually upping the ante. Indeed, they expect their crimes to remain undetected, especially if they have the weight of the White House to execute them. All manner of devastation is within their reach. Ahh…the infinite possibilities. The art of the possible.

And when one is a practiced thug (this one prefers her dreary pants suits…she really ought to up her fashion sense…but in the scheme of things this is the least of her problems), serving either as a spouse to a Liar-in-Chief or as a main underling to one, imagine the prospects for mischief. A radical leftist’s, Islamist loving, Shariah admiring piggy bank. 

As such, even though Benghazigate’s crimes ultimately land at the Commander-in-Chief’s doorstep, Hill’s fingerprints are indelibly demarcated, in tandem with Huma Abedin’s Brotherhood/Sisterhood designs. Thus, leading from here, back to Fort Marcy Park (video below) and onward. 

As Huma Abedin, Hill’s gal pal, climbed her boss’s ladder (and no, this is not meant to be a double entendre…get your minds out of you know where) she landed her BFF into the Islamic muck, exploding even as this is written  – should only go so far, one would think.

But if one meets their match, in all ways which matter, then it is only fair to share the blame when things go asunder in crime. Spread the booty and the punishment too.

Alas, Sec of State’s practiced/accomplished liarette stonewalled here and there, but even her so called concussion will only last so long…the marvels of modern medicine – …but getting to the truth depends on whether or not Congressional investigators let her parse the meaning of ‘is’. Time will tell.

And if they need any assistance in their quantum leaps in logic they can study the following, how best to deconstruct from one cover up to another –…will offer considerable services pro bono…free of charge. A patriot’s duty. No thanks required.

Readers, you have earned your walk from Fort Marcy Park to Benghazi, if your head isn’t still spinning.

‘From Fort Marcy Park to Benghazi: Following the bloody footprints’ – Northeast intelligence Network, Douglas Hagmann

21 December 2012: Cover-ups reveal much about the crimes they are meant to shield, as do the people behind them. Therefore, it is only natural that from an investigator’s view that the people involved in any criminal conspiracy to cover-up death and murder be looked at very carefully. Certain patterns of criminal conduct emerge upon closer scrutiny, and parallels between the death or murder of individuals may be identified by thorough investigation.

Within the last 20 years, two high ranking U.S. government officials and a number of others related to their deaths met their untimely demise, yet legitimate investigations into these deaths were intentionally thwarted, investigators were deliberately misdirected, and as a result, the dead and their loved ones have been denied justice.

I am citing the cases of Vince Foster, the highest ranking government official to die under extremely suspicious circumstances since the 1963 assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy, and the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith. Ambassador Stevens was the first ambassador to be murdered since 1979. Nearly two decades separates the deaths of Foster and Stevens, but one common factor – or person –  figures prominently into both cases: Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In my professional experience as an investigator of nearly 30 years in the private sector, I have investigated numerous “suspicious deaths” for insurance companies that were on the hook for millions of dollars in life insurance proceeds that depended upon the outcome of my investigations. Few things motivate getting at the truth more than such financial exposure, except the need of family members to learn the truth so they may allow their loved ones to rest in peace and find the closure necessary to allow them to move on.  From the beltway to Benghazi, justice for the dead continues to be denied.

At the epicenter of this denial of justice is Hillary Rodham Clinton. The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same. So does the playbook of obstruction, obfuscation, lies and damn lies.

Washington and its spawn have evolved into a cesspool of death and corruption right in front of the eyes of the American public. We no longer demand accountability from our elected and appointed leaders, and the dinosaur media serves as nothing less than a facilitator of the cover-ups to the point of criminal conspiracy.

Converging investigations

Veteran investigative journalist Marinka Peschman has dug deep into the troubled lives of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Clinton by bringing a evidence locker of facts to the American public about the 1993 death of Vince Foster and the activities of the Clintons and others as they relate to the cover-up. Ms. Peschman has given the public a unique opportunity to see through the magicians fog of distraction and misdirection in her new book Following Orders, The Death of Vince Foster, White House Lawyer. In tandem with her previous book titled The Whistleblower: How the Clinton White House Stayed in Power to Reemerge in the Obama White House and on the World Stage, this tenacious investigative journalist has done the job the American media refused to do, and many official investigators were prevented from doing.

Ms. Peschman connects important dots that lead from the Clinton White House directly back into the Obama White House. Following this trail, however, requires the unpleasant ask of having to step over the bodies of the dead, something most American journalists apparently have no problem doing.

Even more compelling, perhaps, is the parallels between the cover-up surrounding the 1993 death of Vince Foster to the recent murders in Benghazi. Marinka Peschman has revealed the playbook of deceit that has been in use for the last 20 years, and has done so with exquisite effectives and fine attention to detail.

Yes, there is a connection between the death of Vince Foster and the Benghazi murders, and that connection is found in the cover-up and the people behind it. The perpetrators are still in power, and they are laughing at you and me.

Join The Hagmann & Hagmann Report tonight beginning at 8:00 p.m. ET when we welcome investigative journalist and popular author Marinka Peschman. Walk with us as we follow the bloody footprints that stain the carpets of the White House and expose the criminal conspiracies that exist because “they can.”

Even though Hill was Barack’s political foe in 2008, make NO mistake – their penchant for crossing legal lines (akin to too many criminally afflicted lawyers) are just one of their dangerous ties that bind.

A political, criminal cartel which makes the Mafia look like kindergarten chumps. Boy scouts too.

What Happens When UN Thugs Bestow ‘Statehood’ Upon Terrorists?…Addendum To: PA Statehood & Its Violations Of International Law…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The left has an irredeemable obsession with third world thugs; the bloodier their handiwork the more beloved they are. And part of their admiration stems from similarly bent ideologies, fully on board with totalitarian control. If it takes bludgeoning millions to death, so be it.

Recall Anita Dunn’s awesome “respect” for mass killer Mao Tse-tung. This is a woman who served the Radical-in-Chief as a czar too ( What a shocker. And the left’s fealty is so reflexive in nature, she didn’t even temper her loving words, as she waxed poetic from the confines of the White House, as well as on the speaking circuit. Birds of a revolutionary feather.

Yet, there is more to the symbiotic relationship than total control. Both the revolutionary left and UN thugs are particularly anti-American and anti-Israel. They view America as the “Big Satan” and Israel as the “Little Satan”, even as these hateful terms are generally attributed to Arabs/Islamists, heaven forfend not to UN diplos. For crying out loud. We all know that leftists and Islamists have the same underlying leanings/designs as totalitarian killers, although they demur otherwise. And this is the main reason why the “Red/Green alliance” is a match made in hell.

Enter Professor Louis Rene Beres and his incontestable, unrivaled international legal credentials. He patiently, diligently and doggedly explains – to the general public – why the UN’s embrace of Abbas aka Abu Mazen; having been Arafat’s protege; as he learned his deadly craft at the bloodied hands of the godfather of modern terrorism, is in DIRECT violation of international legal dictates/norms by  allowing a PA State into the community of nations. However, when thugs rule the roost in the halls of disrepute, then this is the expected result.

And for the record, the following was penned recently, also highlighting Professor Louis Rene Beres’s sage rendering  –

‘Why UN Fiat Won’t Turn Terrorists Into Statesmen’

By: Louis Rene Beres (and it is not for nothing that he is my mentor-
Published: December 19th, 2012

Louis Rene Beres

“The Palestinian Authority has now succeeded with its deliberate strategy for acquiring incremental statehood at the United Nations. Though this cynical end-run around authoritative international law managed to skirt all critically governing expectations of the Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (The Montevideo Convention, 1934), most states in the UN General Assembly were nonetheless willing to grant the PA nonmember observer state status.

What was not summarily changed, however, were the underlying and deeply embedded inclinations of the PA to commit indiscriminate violence against the innocent. The UN vote won’t automatically turn terrorists into statesmen.

Jurisprudentially, at least, all persisting PA and Hamas expressions of violence against Israeli noncombatants will remain terrorism. From the standpoint of international law, even a now upgraded “Palestine” will be unable to justify serial murder of Israelis as “self-determination.” No matter how hard they might try for more sanitized designations in the UN-altered diplomatic milieu, those Palestinians who continue to identify the willful maiming and execution of Israeli civilians in the name of “national liberation” will still be criminals.

Terrorism is always a crime under international law. To date, whenever Palestinian insurgents have claimed a right to use “any means necessary” because they are victims of an alleged “occupation,” their argument has been contrived. After all, there remain irremediably firm jurisprudential limits on (1) permissible targets of insurgent violence and (2) permissible levels of insurgent violence.

The limited rights of insurgency under international law do not include the intentional firing of rockets at schools and apartments, or the use of nail-filled bombs, lovingly dipped in rat poison. Under even their most generous definition in law, these rights can never supplant the settled rules ofhumanitarian international law, norms that are also known as the law of armed conflict. Nowhere is it written that there are certain political goals so overwhelmingly worthy of implementation that they can permit the willful incineration of infants in their cribs, or children at play.

One needn’t be a professor of international law to understand such an elementary proposition.

From the beginning, supporters of Palestinian terror violence against Israelis have argued passionately that the ends of their insurgency (Palestinian “independence”) justify the means(barbarous attacks upon Jewish civilians). Leaving aside everyday and ordinary ethical standards by which such an argument is already manifestly indecent, the ends can never justify the means under conventional or customary international law. Indeed, for more than two thousand years the binding principles of world law have clearly stipulated that planned violence against the innocent is alwaysrepugnant, and always prohibited.

In contrast, in cases where Israeli counter-terrorism kills or injures Palestinian civilians, these particular harms are unintended and are made necessary by calculated Palestinian placement of rocket launchers among noncombatant populations. Here, from the standpoint of international law, the Palestinian side commits the codified crime of “perfidy,” and is therefore legally responsible for those harms actually inflicted by Israel.

Though fashionable to repeat at cocktail parties, the facile expression “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter” is an empty witticism, a shallow phrase devoid of any serious legal meaning. While it is true that certain insurgencies can be judged per se lawful (after all, the idea of “just cause” can be found in the Declaration of Independence of the United States), these residually permissible resorts to force must still conform to the longstanding laws of war.

Whenever an insurgent group or “nonmember observer state” resorts to openly unjust means, its actions are unambiguously terroristic. It follows that even if the ritualistic Palestinian claims of a hostile Israeli “occupation” were reasonable rather than invented, their corresponding claim of entitlement to oppose Israel “by any means necessary” would still remain false.

International law has determinable form and content. Its principles and practices cannot be fashioned and re-fashioned by individual terror groups only to satisfy their own presumed geo-political interests. This fact is unchanged by any diplomatic upgrading of the terror group in question.

National liberation movements that fail to meet the test of just means can never be protected as lawful or legitimate. Even if we could somehow accept the intrinsically spurious argument that Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Fatah fulfill the codified criteria of “national liberation,” it is plain that they do not meet the recognizable standards of discrimination, proportionality, and military necessity. These authoritative standards are applicable to insurgent organizations by the common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and by the two 1977 Protocols to these Conventions.

They are also binding upon all combatants by virtue of broader customary and conventional international law, including Article 1 of the Preamble to the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907. This rule, called the “Martens Clause,” makes all persons responsible for the “laws of humanity” and for the “dictates of public conscience.”

Under international law, the ends can never justify the means. As in the case of war between states, every use of force by insurgents must be judged twice, once with regard to the justness of the objective (in this case, a Palestinian state ultimately to be built upon the charred ruins of a dismembered Israel), and once with regard to the justness of the particular means used toward achieving that objective.

Enthusiastic murderers of young children are never “freedom fighters.” If, in fact, they were ever entitled to such a designation, we would then have to concede that international law itself was nothing more than a mannerly-veneered authorization for inflicting consummate evil in world affairs.

UN supporters of a Palestinian state continue to presume that “Palestine” will somehow be part of a two-state solution. For these naive believers in “peace,” a new and 23rd Arab state will cheerfully exist side-by-side with the extant Jewish state. Significantly, this kindly presumption is dismissed everywhere in the Arab/Islamic world.

Consider cartography. The official map of Palestine at the PA website includes all of Israel. There is only one state on this map; it is not the state of Israel.

In law, terrorist crimes mandate universal cooperation in both apprehension and punishment. As punishers of “grave breaches” under international law, all states are required to search out and prosecute, or extradite, individual terrorist perpetrators. In absolutely no circumstances are states permitted to characterize terrorists as freedom fighters.

This is emphatically true for the United States, which incorporates all international law as the “supreme law of the land” at Article 6 of the Constitution, and which was formed by the founding fathers according to the timeless principles of Blackstone’s Commentaries and antecedent Natural Law.

As Americans, we have an obligation to avoid expressly specious manipulations of law. Authentic freedom fighters do not make war against office workers, nursery schools, buses, flower markets, or mothers in ice-cream parlors. Until we can accept this most elementary human understanding for the Islamic Middle East, we will run the growing risk of further transforming ghoulish Palestinian gangs into a UN-supported government.

Today, the Palestinian Authority is allowed to call itself a nonmember observer state. Soon, leaders of Hamas will join with their enemies in the PA to make common “national” cause against Israel. When, predictably, they resort yet again to waves of expanding violence against the innocent, they will still be acting as terrorists. Despite their newly dignifying formal status at the UN they will remain, situated and unpunished, at the very outermost margins of civilized international relations.”

 And this is the same terrorist who sent a “condolence” missive to his bud at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave after the horrific massacre in Newtown, as if he “understands” the loss of innocent children –

The world has gone off its axis. Its rocker too.


First Amendment Rights On The Chopping Block: Via Criminalizing Criticism Of Islam…Addendum To: Shariah Law-Its Silencing Of All Dissent…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Oftentimes situations appear so fantastical, so off the hook, that even highly rational folks shy away from examining – with a necessary critical eye – what is staring them in the face. Afraid to be seen as “conspiracy theorists” they stay silent, hoping that the incomprehensible just disappears. Poof…into nothingness.

Never gonna happen. Trust your “lying” eyes.

But those who create such cognitive dissonance inducing but no less reality – based plans, count on the above being exactly the case. Knowing full well that people generally veer from discussing said seemingly impossible, improbable  suspicions to their neighbors, friends or next of kin, those who are up to anti-American goals feel freer to charge forward. Non-encumbered. 

And it is the citizen’s hesitation (even as many stand on the sidelines, watching incredulously as they steam roll over America) which allows the gang in Washington not to miss a beat. They assiduously, faithfully, stealthily move towards eviscerating the First Amendment; step by step, in tandem with the Second Amendment They wholly anticipate many to stare agape, immobilized,  out of fear of being received with a jaundiced eye. 

Fatal error. And who cares anyway what these monsters think. Patriots certainly shouldn’t.  And just because going along to get along is generally the most comfortable route – group-think wise – one must step outside ones comfort zone for things which matter more than ones personal discomfit.

IF one is still doubting this and that, look no further than here and there – as Shariah Law – the underbelly/underpinning of Islam – encroaches throughout the west – – aided, abetted, facilitated by the leader of the (heretofore) free world.

And their law enforcers run rampant and roughshod, as they race unimpeded throughout America and beyond –

And Hollywood, police chiefs and others in powerful corporate positions also dance to their tunes –…dhimmi-like before our horrified eyes!

‘Obama Moving To Criminalize Criticism Of Islam’

DECEMBER 14, 2012 BY 
The whole “conspiracy theory” of the Obama administration being infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, purging government documents critical of Islam, and seeking to criminalize the criticism of Islam is just that—a conspiracy theory—isn’t it?

Sadly, it isn’t. If you simply pull back the curtain and look at what Obama has been doing in plain sight—inviting groups convicted of terrorism into the White House, having Muslim Brotherhood members within the State Department, purging training materials of anything critical of Islam–you would find that this whole “conspiracy theory” goes by another term: the truth. How America got to this point and whether we can return to that Shining City on a Hill instead of on our way to the trash heap of history remains to be seen. I have a feeling the American people, as they have done in the past, will rise up and take back this country…”

But if the above still lacks the proofs one needs to pass the requisite “smell test”, demonstrating the danger the First Amendment is in, then the only evidence which will suffice is, unfortunately, that which will be too late to matter.

As is said, silence is agreement. It is this silence which fuels those gunning for your free speech…your guns…one anti-American shredding at a time. Buck up!

Islamists Of All Stripes Gunning For Syria’s Chemical Arsenals…Reaching Its Perimeter…Addendum To: The Unleashing Of A World War Via Russia…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

ANY way one tries to parse the most immediate threat to a World War, one comes up with the slaughter going on in Syria. And it is hardly the case, if one side wins over the other, Israel and the west will be safer. NOT at all.

And the very fact that Al Qaeda terrorists are fighting side by side with the ‘rebels’; Hizbullah and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRG) are battling them; is cold comfort and leaves no room for championing one side over the other. And it means diddly squat that the US is siding with one over the other. For if this was a pissing contest, surely an administration which ran the LARGEST, illegal gun running/weapons smuggling operation in U.S. history and ended up supplying thousands of Al Qaeda terrorists as a result, those with their brains intact wouldn’t have confidence in their horse pick –

The point being, since this administration is also the most anti-American in U.S. history, then everything is suspect – And herein lies the crux – Israel is stuck between a rock and a hard place, each side gunning for her demise. 

So, it is hardly hyperbole to suggest that a World War is upon us, mostly due to the interference of an Islamist-in-Chief –

‘Scuds blast big Syrian rebel push for al-Safira chemical arms store’

DEBKAfile Special Report December 21, 2012

The al-Safira military-chemical weapons complex
The al-Safira military-chemical weapons complex

The Syrian Air Force is again firing Scud missiles, this time to stem the general offensive Syrian opposition forces, including jihadis, launched Friday, Dec. 21, to capture the Syrian army’s military-industrial complex at al Safira and the big chemical and biological weapons store adjoining the facility. It is there, that Scud D missiles stand ready for launching, loaded with chemical weapons.

Rebel forces are converging on Al Safira from the east, the west and the south. Among them are brigades of the Jabhat al-Nusra which the US has designated part of al Qaeda in Iraq.
DEBKAfile military sources report extremely heavy fighting. The rebels have reached points 1-2 kilometers from the perimeter walls of the Al Safira chemical weapons stores and are being pounded by Syrian warplanes and assault helicopters as well as Scuds, in a desperate effort to halt their advance.

Success in seizing control of those stores would re-tilt the balance of the war in their favor and bring President Bashar Assad face to face with a decision on whether to broach the perilous dimension of chemical warfare on the rebels or even against NATO or US targets outside Syria.
A prime factor in his decision would be the information received in Moscow and Tehran – and almost certainly passed on to the Syrian ruler – that taking part in the offensive are rebels who underwent training in recent weeks in northern Jordan by US, Czech and Polish officers in tactics for seizing chemical or biological caches and dismantling them.

Russian and Iranian intelligence watchers suspect that elements from all three armies as well as Jordan are present in the rebel assault force, in order to be on the spot when the weapons of mass destruction are captured and appropriate them to forces under NATO command.  They must beat Jabhat al-Nusra’s fighting brigades to this target, although at this moment, the jihadis are ahead of the race.
The battle for al Safira has brought US and NATO into direct intervention in Syrian hostilities. Western intelligence services estimate that even if Assad removed some of the banned weapons from this complex, large quantities remain and must be prevented from reaching the wrong hands.”

Batten down the hatches….

The Nexus Between Cover Ups: Benghazigate Mirror Image Of Fast & Furious…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The same thugs-in-suits who ran guns through Mexico – killing a Border Agent and scores of kids in Mexico too – are guilty of covering up the BIGGEST gun running/weapons smuggling operation in US history.

And these goons would have Americans (and others too) believe that the kiddies in Newtown are their paramount concern; as they hide behind their cold, dead bodies to ram through gun control, contrary to the Second Amendment! Does it get any more twisted than that; those responsible for scores of deaths of youngsters in Mexico (‘Eric Holder Buries Another Fast And Furious Victim’- due to another deadly operation – Fast & Furious – also designed to grab American’s guns, are again spitting on the dead. They understand that an armed guard/administrator/teacher would have spared the carnage! And it was their decision to gut the funding, not once but twice, for school safety revamping.


So, as Obama and his radical/racialist AG hustle to ‘legalize’ the gutting of the Second Amendment, one has to ask: what will it take to finally bring down this unlawful duo? And this blogger is not the only one attempting to hold their feet to the fire. Not at all.

‘Another Benghazi / Fast and Furious parallel? State Department employees not allowed to talk’

by  on DECEMBER 13, 2012 

The parallels between Operation Fast and Furious and the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi continue to mount. The latest example comes courtesy of Kerry Picket. She is reporting that Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who serves on the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, says the State Department is not allowing him to talk to any of the survivors of the Benghazi attack.

Via Bretibart:

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R- UT) told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he has been “thwarted” by the State Department from seeing any Americans who survived the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in  Benghazi. Many people forget that there were Americans who survived the Benghazi attack, some of whom were badly injured and are still recovering.

“My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I’d like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are—or even how many there are,” Rep. Chaffetz said. I don’t know who they are. I don’t know where they live. I don’t know what state they’re from. I don’t even know how many there are. It doesn’t seem right to me.

So, how is this reminiscent of how the Fast and Furious investigation was handled?

Understand how history repeats itself with today’s persecution of Christians in Islamic countries and compare to the plight of the Jews in Nazi Occupied Europe, click her for details.

Consider the names Kevin O’Reilly and William Newell. When the DOJ / ATF – led Operation Fast and Furious was at its peak, there were communications between Newell and O’Reilly, who at the time was Director of North American Affairs with the National Security Council (the White House). If one ATF employee could be placed at the center of Fast and Furious, Newell might be that guy.

Here is a very compelling exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Newell from July 26, 2011 in which Gowdy confronts the former SAC about an email between O’Reilly and Newell. Shortly after this exchange, O’Reilly was transferred to Iraq to work as a State Department employee:

Obviously, after O’Reilly’s name was brought into the Fast and Furious scandal, Oversight Committee chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) wanted to talk to him. Here is an exchange between Issa and Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier a couple of months after the July 26th hearing:

More than one year later, O’Reilly returned from Iraq to work at the State Department.

Via CNS News:

Obama administration employee Kevin O’Reilly — who congressional investigators called “the link connecting the White House to the [Fast and Furious] scandal” — is back in the United States now after abruptly leaving his White House job to work in Iraq in 2011 after emails concerning him and Fast and Furious had surfaced.

O’Reilly left the United States in August 2011, shortly after his knowledge of the gun-walking program was publicized during a congressional hearing on July 26.

O’Reilly has so far refused to cooperate with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which recently threatened to subpoena him. He also refused to cooperate with the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General, which investigated the program and recently released its findings.

Both the House committee and the Inspector General’s office sought to interview O’Reilly about Fast and Furious but the White House refused to grant him permission to be interviewed.

Another curious bit of timing involved the release of the DOJ’s Inspector General report just weeks before O’Reilly’s return from Iraq, meaning that O’Reilly left for Iraq shortly after he became a person of interest for the Oversight Committee and returned shortly after the DOJ IG issued its final report. Despite this, the White House said that was all coincidence:

In August 2011 — after the e-mails were first discussed at a July 26 congressional hearing — O’Reilly was named as the senior director of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Programs in Iraq, a State Department position.

“Unsung Davids”, a new and powerful book tells the story of ten modern-day heroes who fought tyranny and evil but are given little or no recognition. Click Here for more details.

The State Department official told that O’Reilly’s reassignment to Iraq from the White House “was a standard foreign service career rotation that had been planned for months in advance of his detail to the NSS.” The State Department could not confirm O’Reilly’s new title at the State Department.

So, what do Kevin O’Reilly and the survivors of the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi have in common? All are State Department employees (presumptively); all were somehow connected to operations that involved the murder of American officials; and all are being prevented from speaking to Congressional committees who want and deserve answers.

Adding insult to grievous injury and pointed towards the direction of the American people, along comes another Capitol Hill investigation to get to the truth, but nothing of the sort is afoot. Far from it.

‘The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report’ – Douglas Hagmann
“Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could it be more insulting to their memory, their families and to the intelligence of the American public.19 December 2012: Under the cover of the Newtown school shooting, an “independent” five member investigative panel quietly released an unclassified, 39-page report Tuesday night, detailing their findings of the attack that led to the murder of four Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. The report cites five main reasons for the loss of life, all primarily related to inadequate security for U.S. personnel.

However, the independent panel found that no “U.S. Government employee engaged in misconduct or willfully ignored his or her responsibilities, and, therefore did not find reasonable cause to believe that an individual breached his or her duty so as to be the subject of a recommendation for disciplinary action.” Stated another way, no one is to blame nor will be held accountable for the murders of Americans Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods, and Ambassador Chris Stevens., so just continue about your business.

The report was released in advance of closed door congressional testimony scheduled for today by two senior panel members, retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Mike Mullen. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was also scheduled to testify this week, but has declined to do so as a result of her recent fainting spell. Others are unavailable to testify or have not been asked, which is a common tactic when the outcome of an investigation is fixed from the beginning, and this, based on an extensive review of all available evidence, most certainly was.

2012 Game show panel: To Tell The Truth

It is an interesting bit of trivia, perhaps, that the popular television game show To Tell the Truthpremiered exactly 56 years to the day that the Benghazi report was released. The objective of the 2012 real world panel appears to be the antithesis of former game show, as ferreting out the truth did not appear to be the panel’s objective.

The panel report offers nothing more than obligatory eye candy in the form of a stinging rebuke of State Department management and leadership failures that led to the murder of four Americans. The panel deliberately convolutes the pertinent issues with unrelated historical accounts of security issues in Libya dating back to 1967, giving the reader a sense of thoroughness while leaving the main issues untouched by design.

Ironically, the report opens with a 1905 quote from George Santayanna: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”  Included perhaps to add legitimacy and a veneer of integrity to an investigative report unworthy of such a definition, it is an insult to those aware of the actual events leading up to the murderous attacks of 9/11.

To understand how the truth behind the murders and the events of the attack is being buried amid familiar terms and talking points suitable for both political parties and their spokespeople, it is vital to understand the origin and makeup of the “independent” panel. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened the Accountability Review Board (ARB) in the wake of the attacks, quietly appointing retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering to chair and direct the panel. His appointment unceremoniously appeared in the October 4, 2012 edition of the Federal Register.

As noted in a previous report by this author, Thomas Pickering is an obvious choice to direct an investigation that could have any negative implications to Iran or this administration’s associations with the Muslim Brotherhood. Pickering is an advisory board member of the pro-Iranian organization known as the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), and co-chairman of the board of directors of the International Crisis Group (ICG), whose executive committee includes the infamous George Soros. Pickering is also vice-chairman of Hills & Co., global consultants founded in 1993 by CFR and Trilateral Commission member Carla Anderson Hills.

The significance of Pickering’s appointment cannot be overstated or underestimated considering that the trail of blood from four Americans leads directly to Ansar al Sharia, a terrorist group funded by Iran. Who better to redirect or cover up the operational conspiracy that exists between Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton and that Muslim Brotherhood that exists at the core of the 9/11 attack? Pickering is the obvious choice.

From the untouched to the absurd

Left untouched by the Pickering panel are the intrinsically sinister machinations of Obama, Jarrett and Clinton, as they as are methodically taking us to the brink of a new war in Syria through their weapons running operations in Benghazi. The report intentionally offered only a very narrow view of the events in Benghazi, limiting their scope to the already exposed security deficiencies that were secondary to the redefined Benghazi “consulate.” Using this tactic effectively diverts attention away from the real issue and thus, the actual cause for the attack.

Beyond the narrow focus of the security issues and the subsequent inconsequential wrist slap, the investigative panel descends further into the abyss of absurdity and insult by incredibly asserting that everything possible had been done to rescue and save our Ambassador and Sean Smith, and further asserted that “the interagency response was timely and appropriate, but there was simply not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference.”

That finding alone should alarm every thinking American based on open source intelligence and what is known, as well as what has yet to be disclosed. Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could it be more insulting to families of the dead and to the intelligence of the American public.

Perhaps Pickering and his cadre of co-conspirators would like to disclose to the American people the strange odyssey of a certain C-130 aircraft that left Croatia to Libya to provide assistance to the Americans under siege at the onset of the attack. The portal-to-portal flight time is about four hours, yet it did not officially “appear” on site for 23 hours. Perhaps it’s time to address the fact that the lie is different at every level, and for Pickering to stop being a firewall between his bosses and the truth owed to every American, and particularly to the families of those who were murdered.

It’s time to ask whether the crew of that C-130 was ever identified and interviewed. It’s time to locate and ask the personnel on board that aircraft how long it was, after they changed from their military uniforms into their street clothes to enact a rescue, were they forced to wait while the embattled Americans endured the attack and met their deaths. Oh yes, there is information known and crying out to be made public despite the contempt for the truth and equally important, the contempt for the American people by Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and Valerie Jarrett.

Four Americans were murdered in Benghazi. Over forty thousand are dead in Syria. Soon, it will be four million dead as a result of the hidden agenda of our elected leaders, the complicity of a corrupt media, and the complacency of a brainwashed public. Today we cry over the deaths in Newtown, but tomorrow, our sobs will be for the masses.” …and the scapegoating begins-

Their criminality and subterfuge is so out-sized in scope, the chief culprits understand that revelations, via private and public hearings, would lock them  up for life.

And this is why they will pull out all stops to keep the truth from seeping through, but it in no way obligates millions of patriotic Americans to go along with their subterfuge. And a million (or more) person march on Washington is not out of the question either. It’s at least as important as the ‘Million Man’ march cobbled together through Black hucksters not too long ago. You think?


The Unleashing Of A World War Via Russia On Behalf Of Syria and Iran…Check Mate…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Whereas the west hasn’t played for keeps since World War 2, its enemies have had no such reservations. And while PC psychosis has exemplified decades of western appeasement, Islamists and their RED helpmates – chiefly Russia and China – have charged ahead. 

And other than lying down and surrendering – what’s ours is yours – nothing will stop the upcoming World War. But it didn’t have to be this way….let this blogger’s commentaries serve as a reminder for upcoming generations as they wonder: how the hell did this happen?

So, the Mid East is fast approaching the point of no return –…again, unless western powers – Israel too – meet their demands through crawling in a supine position.

Alas, Barack HUSSEIN Obama set the train wreck in motion, soon to be complicit in its devastating handiwork –

‘Assad’s deadly agenda: First, chemicals, next, Iskander 9K720’

DEBKAfile Video December 19, 2012, 11:28 AM (GMT+02:00)

On Dec. 5, the first American, Dutch and German Patriot missiles landed in Turkey.

Within hours, three Russian warships had put into Syria’s Tartus port – the Novocherkasskand Saratov landing craft and the MB-304 supply vessel. Aboard were 300 marines. And not only fighting men. They also delivered a fearsome weapon for Assad’s army and a game changer in the Syrian conflict: 24 Iskander 9K720 (NATO codenamed SS-26 Stone) cruise missile systems, designed for theater level conflicts.
While NATO unpacked the Patriots in Turkey, a dozen mobile batteries, each carrying a pair of Iskander missiles, were fixed into position opposite Turkey, and another dozen, opposite Jordan and Israel.

At all their stations, the Russian missiles pointed at US military targets.

So while the West was gripped with alarm over Assad’s poison sarin gas shells and bombs and gearing up for missile attacks on Turkey, the Russians were injecting into the Syrian war field the most sophisticated weapon of death thus far.
The West and Israel have no answer for the Iskander’s hypersonic speed of more than 1.3 miles per second with a 280 mile-range and a 1,500-pound warhead which destroys targets with pinpoint accuracy. It is also nuclear-capable.

Russian President Vladimir Putin promised two US presidents, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, not to let the Iskander reach the hands of Syria or Iran.
Moscow has no illusions that once in Syria, the lethal cruise missile will pretty soon reach Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Saturday, Dec. 15, Iran’s chief of staff Gen. Hassan Firouzabadi warned that the Patriot missiles in Turkey portended world war. He was referring to the missile-versus-missile face-off in Syria .

By giving Assad the Iskanders, Moscow has plumped itself squarely in the Tehran-Damascus-Hizballah camp, whereas President Obama is carefully holding back from an unreserved commitment to the Syrian insurgency.

Some Western circles see Russia’s military intervention in the Syrian conflict as presaging Bashar Assad’s early downfall.  The reality, according to DEBKAfile’s sources, is that before he falls, the Syria ruler is getting ready for desperate measures – first by unleashing chemical warfare and, after that, using the deadly Iskanders for a last throw against his enemies.”

And if readers do not recognize the Islamist-in-Chief’s hand in all of the above, as she continually, aggressively presents overwhelming evidence – leveling charge after charge against him – then there is no longer any hope of convincing otherwise. He played both ends against the middle and herein lies the truth.

A regional…soon to be worldwide…unleashed wild fire!

Hillary’s Benghazigate Stonewall: Will She Or Won’t She Testify? That IS The Question…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those of us blessed to have children – sons or daughters, or a combination of both – understand what it feels like to be stonewalled. Whether they are in grade school, high school, studying at university or totally flown from the coop, parents (especially moms…and Jewish ones at that!) have a visceral ‘need to know’.

But those who learn their lessons well also know when the time has come to mind their own business, thereby, keeping parental noses clear of matters no longer within their purview. And parents who are especially astute also recognize their offspring’s signals, understanding which topics are truly off limits. Yours truly has been down that road, more times than she cares to admit to.

So, where is the connection between family intrigues and Hill’s part in Benghazigate with all its attendant twists and turns? Closer than you can imagine.

The brazen lengths which Hill has gone to – to keep herself immunized/neutralized from Benghazigate – are beyond any parent’s wildest imagination, even the most ‘creative’ types who also cross many boundaries to satisfy their ‘need to know’. But the Sec of State doesn’t have the luxury of NOT spilling the beans, as she is accountable to ‘The People’, unlike ones children who are ultimately accountable to themselves, especially when grown.

And not unlike little children who swear up and down that their sticky fingers haven’t been in the cookie jar – yet the evidence is smeared all over their adorable faces – Hill can’t get a ‘sick’ note, thus claiming this or that belly ache. For crying out loud. Fess up.

Yet this blogger understands very well why she is punting every which way, hoping to escape her punishment, alongside her wayward, criminal-bent boss. 

And even some leftist media types are having a hard time keeping a lid on the most explosive scandal in U.S. history – It’s that hot.

The more incendiary the bombs, which creep to the fore, renders the players more desperate – too.

So, the entrance of CIA Director Petraeus via his downfall raises the stakes to the nth degree – …and Hill, the consummate political operator, knows what this portends. The besmirched General has little to lose.

Adding to her heartburn – oh, does she deserve it – is the knowledge that gal pal, Huma Abedin will be dragged in too – …when Benghazigate hits critical mass. Not only will she be ensnared in this gargantuan criminal cover up, but other skeletons will tumble out as well. Karma can be a bitch.

‘Hillary’s fortuitous fall from her Benghazi Stonewall’

by  on DECEMBER 15, 2012 in BLOGGENERAL

The alleged fainting spell and subsequent concussion of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appears a bit fortuitous, if not downright suspicious when factoring in all of her stonewalling and obfuscation to this point.

It all started on September 16th, when U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice – instead of Hillary – appeared on five Sunday talk shows to give demonstrably false information about the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. Rice said in an interview with NBC’s Brian Williams that the reason Hillary ‘declined to do it’was because the Secretary of State was too tired after a ‘grueling week’.

On November 30th, when Hillary was asked why Rice appeared on those shows instead of her, the Secretary of State responded that she wouldn’t answer a “hypothetical” about what could have happened.

No, she really said that (at the :37 mark):

Even MSNBC’s resident RINO, Joe Scarborough could see right through this one. Start watching at the 2:40 mark when the Morning Joe Crew airs a snippet of Rice’s interview with Williams but pay more attention to Scarborough’s reaction afterward. He is convinced that the reason Hillary didn’t do those shows was because of a political calculation, not because of fatigue.

“The greatest study on the source of all evil. How to identify evil even when it is cloaked in “righteousness” click her for more information.”

Before moving on, time for another illustration of what Scarborough was talking about, via Jim Carrey, who represents Susan Rice in this metaphor:

Back to Hillary…

On October 2nd, the House Oversight Committee sent Hillary a letter asking for answers about why requests for security at the Benghazi consulate were ignored. Her response?

Ignore the letter.

On November 1st, the House Oversight Committee sent Hillary another letter,asking about documents that had come into the possession of the Committee which showed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and officials at the consulate were very concerned about their security on the day of the attack. Her response?

Ignore the letter.

“Unsung Davids”, a new and powerful book tells the story of ten modern-day heroes who fought tyranny and evil but are given little or no recognition. One of those men actually did battle with Hillary Clinton. Click Here for more details.

In early November, it was reported that Hillary declined to appear before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on the 15th of that month because she would be in Australia.

Via PJM:

“She was asked to appear at House Foreign Affairs next week, and we have written back to the chairman to say that she’ll be on travel next week,” said department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. She did not answer a question about whether Clinton would be willing to fly back from Australia to address either the Foreign Affairs panel or the Senate and House closed-door intelligence committee hearings getting to the root of the Benghazi scandal.

On December 10th, it was reported that Hillary would be canceling her trip to the Middle East due to a stomach virus. Three days later, it was reported early in the day that she would be testifying in front of the Senate and House foreign relations committee on December 20th. Later in the day, it appeared that Clinton was backing away from testifying because the Accountability Review Board (ARB) had not completed its report and probably wouldn’t by the 20th.

Via Foreign Policy:

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said today that the ARB is not complete, might not be complete by Dec. 20, and Clinton has not agreed to testify on Dec. 20.

“The Hill has talked about a planning date on the calendar. That presumes that the ARB is finished,” Nuland said. “That’s dependent on all of the work getting done between now and then… The ARB is continuing to do its work, to my knowledge it has not yet completed its work.”

Clinton has agreed to brief the House and Senate foreign relations committees on how she interprets the ARB report, whenever it surfaces.

In the wake of this equivocating, pressure was no doubt applied to the State Department by committee members. For one thing, they announced that Hillary would testify because the date was on the State Department’s calendar. For another thing, committee members insisted that they have access to the ARB report despite Nuland’s claims that all Hillary could agree to was to include Congress in her response to the ARB report. None of that includes how frustrated many committee members are by how long Clinton and the State Department have been stonewalling.

Then, on the morning of December 15th, Hillary faints as a consequence of her stomach virus and gets a concussion.

Via Foreign Policy:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton won’t testify to Congress next week on Benghazi, after fainting and suffering a concussion Saturday and due to her ongoing stomach ailment.

“While suffering from a stomach virus, Secretary Clinton became dehydrated and fainted, sustaining a concussion,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Philippe Reines said in a statement. “She has been recovering at home and will continue to be monitored regularly by her doctors. At their recommendation, she will continue to work from home next week, staying in regular contact with Department and other officials. She is looking forward to being back in the office soon.”

Deputy Secretaries of State Bill Burns and Tom Nides will both testify in Clinton’s place, according to the office of Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-MA).

Note how suddenly the readiness of the ARB report is no longer an issue. Bill Burns and Tom Nides are about to assume the same position that Susan Rice did on September 16th and isn’t it interesting that they’ll apparently be doing it whether the ARB report is completed or not.

One day before Clinton’s fortuitous fall, Fox News’ Chris Stirewalt wrote the following:

Clinton can hardly leave her post before a replacement is confirmed, so her goal is to keep the Benghazi business from damaging her valedictory weeks at Foggy Bottom.

It’s a tricky task, but as Rice learned and Obama has been taught again, Clinton is not someone to be underestimated.

Perhaps, but  a concussion caused by passing out from a stomach virus days before she was set to testify?!

Before sending Rice out to do the talking, Hillary was apparently too tired to do it herself. Now, before sending Burns and Nides out to do the talking, she has a virus that caused her to fall on her head.

One thing should be very, very obvious. Hillary Clinton does not want to talk about Benghazi.


And the more dirt uncovered re State’s part in the Mid East hell fire – with the full sanction/blessings of the Commander-in-Chief – the harder Hill will fight to keep herself from burning within. 



Patriots, squeeze your reps like never before….they are positioning themselves to find a ‘no-fault’ action against any and all. So, inundate their Capitol Hill offices as if your lives depend on it…until Hill has nowhere to run…nowhere to hide….the POTUS too. 

The mightier they are the harder they fall…faster…faster…