U.S. Leftist Media In The Service Of A Radical Revolutionary Obama Administration…What Can Go Wrong?Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Under the guise of the ‘Freedom Of Information Act’ an increasingly non-free media is servicing the government’s agenda. Say what? In plain English (not the bastardized cocktail blend used by multicultural psychotics), the media are behaving like quarterbacks for a regime they are ideologically in bed with, as well as being nudged along – by the powers that be – to “go along to get along”. Pravda-like.

And it is not as if the above is news, but it is the case that their back benching has increased manifestly ever since “The One” (repeatedly compared to Lincoln) burst – out of nowhere – onto the national stage. The (media) fix was in. 

Yet, the perils of a compliant media are self evident in third world, brutish regimes, but they are less so in a quasi-free society, whereby the appearance of freedom of expression is less than one step away from being the truth.

Make no mistake. The following are just some of the results of a government controlled media, where veering from the prescribed script is less likely than finding a virgin in a whore house – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/what-happens-when-a-compliant-media-ceases-their-due-diligence-thus-parroting-officialdoms-narratives-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …as journalist’s parrot officialdom’s narratives. Dangerous. Toxic. Deadly too.

While no one should be surprised at the report below, patriots should be spitting bullets – figuratively, of course – at its contents. And those who had the misfortune to see said reportage on their tv screens were very likely enraged to the nth degrees. Channel that anger, constructively-speaking. High blood pressure is a (silent) killer. 

For if the media truly believes that accessing home addresses and private info falls under the ‘Freedom Of Information Act’ (twisting its legitimate mandate into contorted knots), then who is to say that patriots don’t have the same rights too. Hell, yes. Therefore, turn about is indeed fair play. And this blogger leaves it up to her tens of thousands (currently topping 100,000 since her launch five months ago, but never mind) of readership to devise ways to “out” the private info of said media birdies, under the purview of the public’s “need to know”.

Need some fire in your bellies….



“A New York newspaper has gone to the effort to map out and publish online – complete with names and addresses – all the people in its area who own handgun permits.

The Journal News of White Plains, N.Y., has created interactive, online maps of all handgun permit holders in Westchester and Rockland counties, while it’s also waiting on information from Putnam County.

The newspaper boasts it was able to obtain the names and addresses through a Freedom of Information request, for New York state law makes permit holders’ information public record.

The interactive maps not only give an overall picture of the distribution of handgun permits, but can also be zoomed in upon, revealing the name and address of those licensed to own a handgun, be it pistol or revolver.

Presumably, a person familiar with an area could also use the maps to obtain locations of homes where the owner doesn’t have a handgun permit.

Jeff Knox, director of The Firearms Coalition, called the newspaper’s action “an outrageous invasion of privacy and a highly irresponsible action.”

“People choose to own handguns for a variety of reasons, personal defense being the most common,” Knox told WND. “How many victims of domestic violence, armed to protect themselves from an abusive spouse or boyfriend, were jeopardized by releasing this information? How many vulnerable seniors were placed at-risk by revealing the fact that they own guns?

A gun in the home is a last line of defense against violent criminals,” Knox continued. “Publicizing the existence of the gun in a particular home can have a potentially deadly impact. Guns are highly desirable targets of thieves, and we can expect that some of the people on this list will have their homes burglarized within the next 12 months.”

Response to the online article, judging by its comments section, has likewise been overwhelmingly negative.

“This is crazy!” commented a poster identified as Curtis Maenza. “Why in the world would you post every licensed gun owner[‘s] information? What do you hope to accomplish by doing this? This is the type of thing you do for sex offenders, not law-abiding gun owners. … I am canceling my subscription with your paper today!”

A poster identifying himself as Robert Wachtel of Mahopac, N.Y., added, “This is the single most irresponsible and dangerous piece of ‘journalism’ I have ever seen. Criminals can now target a specific neighborhood, wait for pistol permit holders to leave for work and burglarize their homes looking for firearms.”

He continued, “There is no legitimate public policy purpose for having pistol-permit info available to the general public. Many states have shielded this information and made it available only to law enforcement. I encourage everyone to contact their state representatives to have this … information shielded.”

The state of New York has become a hotbed for debate on the issue of gun laws since the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Conn.

At the forefront is the New York Daily News, which shed all pretense of unbiased journalism by publishing a frontpage headline following the shooting that read, “Blood on Your Hands,” and called for readers to sign a petition to “institute comprehensive gun control.” The paper’s editorial department further called Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association a “gun-crazed maniac” who “will forever now be known as America’s maddest gunman.” It has continued in news and editorial coverage to refer to LaPierre as “crazy.”

The highly charged atmosphere surrounding the issue gave Knox yet another reason to criticize the newspaper’s action.

“At a time when prominent public personalities and political operatives are blaming gun owners for the terrible atrocity in Newtown, Conn., and calling for the deaths of gun owners and NRA members,” Knox said, “the publication of this information appears to be an overt threat and intentional effort at intimidation.

“The publication of this information just goes to demonstrate why gun owners around the country are so vehemently opposed to laws requiring registration of firearms,” he concluded. “Something like this paints a large bull’s-eye on the backs of gun owners and on the front doors of their homes, placing them and their families at risk for no justifiable reason.”


And because radical leftists have not met the back hand of Constitutional Conservatives they continually up the ante. Therefore, this NY newspaper continues apace with their “revelations” – www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/12/gluttons_for_pain_ny_newspaper_to_publish_more_addresses_of_gun_owners.html…but it is doubtful they would have the cajones to do so in “red neck” territory.

Nevertheless, leftist revolutionaries should be careful what they wish for. For if they persist in their witch hunt, they run the risk of turning otherwise law abiding, patriotic, Constitutionally Conservative Americans into their enemies.

After all, when this one or that one places bulls eyes on their backs, what else should they expect? Indeed.

And if the left is as smart as they think they are, unlike the “bitter clingers” they disparage, they would be wise to “cease and desist”….but then again, this blogger is Constitutionally Conservative, so according to the leftist revolutionaries she is as dumb as a post.


What Happens When Investigations Into Deaths – Associated With The Highest Levels of Gov’t – Are Thwarted? Freedoms Die Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Let’s take a brief stroll down memory lane but this mental meandering will shortly bring us squarely back to the present. Patience, dear readers. All in due time.

To begin with, to believe that Vince Foster (deputy counsel to former President Clinton, you know, the POTUS who committed perjury; was impeached; yet still kept his job, yes, that lying scum) committed suicide is to believe in the tooth fairy. Similarly, to posit that Benghazigate has anything to do with a video is to conclude that pigs can fly. Or if you buy that several mysterious deaths, connected to the Thug-in-Chief, are accidental, well, then unicorns are real too. And these are just a tiny sampling of the too many lies they tell/sell, and whereby DOA bodies are ‘inexplicably’ never far behind. Who do they think they are, Houdini?

The point being, when leaders – especially those who are supposed to lead the free world – feel that they are untouchable, tyranny is not far behind. And when a compliant media jumps on board, the amount of lying becomes more than a free country can bear. Its price is inordinately and exponentially too high to pay.

Some of us may recall the tall tales told, when Clinton’s reprobate White House decided that the Oklahoma City terror attack was not the people’s business. Say what? The biggest terror attack pre 9/11/01 (other than Pearl Harbor) became one cover up after another. And if not for a compliant media, a courageous investigative reporter, Jayna Davis, would not have had to do her own very dangerous digging – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/what-happens-when-a-compliant-media-ceases-their-due-diligence-thus-parroting-officialdoms-narratives-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Yet those who facilitated the lies (covering up the solid as a rock Middle East connections) are still free to wreck more mischief. Shades of a banana republic, even back in 1995.

Par for their (wretched) course, an administration hell bent on keeping the Mid East out of Oklahoma City’s carnage, similarly, the death of Vince Foster (ostensibly by suicide…hint: Whitewater) was also shrouded in mystery, yet the truly rational were dictated…move right along…nothing to see.

Thank heavens there are still those intrepid enough to follow leads, wherever they go. And despite whatever pressure is exerted to ‘close the case’ some keep digging. Kudos. The following recently released expose should whet many truth seeker’s appetites. 

‘Following Orders: The Death of Vince Foster, Clinton White House Lawyer’

Prologue – Canada Free Press, Dec 4, 2012

While it might have initially appeared that the deputy counsel to the president of the United States was taking a nap in a park—lying neatly face-up on a steep embankment with his feet pointing down—Vincent W. Foster Jr. was not napping. He was dead. Dressed in expensive trousers and a white dress shirt, less than eight miles from the White House, he was lying dead. A single gun-shot wound to the head. Dead. Some of the blood on Foster’s face was still wet, but starting to dry. A trail of bloodflowed upwards from his nose to above his ear. The man who found his body said there was no gun, but after he left to notify police, a gun appeared in Foster’s hand. It was July 20, 1993. President William Jefferson Clinton’s Arkansas childhood friend, and First Lady Hillary Clinton’s Rose Law Firm partner, and White House confidante was dead.

At the pinnacle of his law career, where rumors of a U.S. Supreme Court appointment abounded, Foster, the loving husband and father of three, who worked directly with the most powerful couple in the world, was dead. The tall, handsome, Southern gentleman, would never see his forty-ninth birthday, never laugh, smile, or speak again. The twinkle in his hazel eyes was forever darkened. Vince Foster was dead.

White House reporter: “Considering Mr. Foster’s position and his status [in the Clinton White House], isn’t it reasonable to assume that law enforcement agencies are at least going to make some attempt to determine a motive here? For example, if you don’t do that, you’ll leave open wild possibilities, such as that he may have been being blackmailed or anything like that—just to rule those things out? Don’t you think it’s reasonable that a law enforcement agency will attempt to establish a motive?”It was an executive assistant in Hillary’s presidential counsel’s office, Linda Tripp, who was officially one of the last people to have seen Foster alive in the White House.

Clinton Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers: “My only point, is that at this point, the Park Service Police is the only agency that’s investigating [Vince Foster’s death], and that the objective of their search is simply to determine that it was a suicide.”

Are we clear? The objective of the investigation into Vince Foster’s death was “simply to determine that it was a suicide [emphasis mine].” The conclusion was predetermined. From the get-go, homicide, foul play, the possibility of blackmail, a potential risk toAmerica’s national security, was never investigated. Facts be damned. Vince Foster committed suicide in Fort Marcy Park. No need for the Clinton White House to cooperate with investigators or the press. They didn’t. Case closed. Move on …

In America there has been a slow, creeping destruction of the freedom of speech and of the rule of law, and soon all Americans will lose free speech completely if they do not fight for it now. Though the road to silencing legitimate questions from the media and Americans alike may have been a long, deliberate one, crafted by those in power like Hillary and Bill Clinton—used to stay in power, and to thwart the rule of law—it becomes harder to reverse the silencing trend, expose government malfeasance, and hold corruption accountable if people do not stand up and speak now. Like an undiagnosed cancer, silence permits corruption to grow. Not to speak is to speak. You must choose your side.

The word “cover-up” is defined as: “a usually concerted effort to keep an illegal or unethical act or situation from being made public.”

It has often been said in the history of modern political scandals, that the cover-up is much worse than the crime or the incident. I will leave that to you to decide.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ….” Despite the fact that Vince Foster’s sudden death was the shocking and questionable passing of the highestranking U.S. government official since President John Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963, asking obvious questions about it became taboo and politically incorrect.

Even though the Senate Whitewater Committee investigation’s conclusion revealed that there was “a concerted effort by senior White House officials to block career law enforcement investigators from conducting a thorough investigation” into Foster’s death, and recommended “that steps be taken to insure that such misuse of the White House counsel’s office does not recur in this, or any future, administration,” meaningful and honest reporting was still attacked. Journalists or investigators who dared to speak truth to power by asking legitimate and common-sense questions were sidelined, mocked, dismissed as right-wing hacks or scolded by Hillary for inflicting “great emotional and monetary damage on innocent people.”

Americans no longer had a right to know what was happening in their White House, and the lawlessness and secrecy in government has only gotten worse ever since. This is one of the many reasons why the Foster story must be told now. As history is repeating itself in the scandal-ridden Obama-Clinton regime—from Fast and Furious, to Wikileaks and Benghazi-Gate—investigators are being thwarted once again, and Americans are in danger around the world and at home.

Yet despite that, the Obama-Clinton regime was reelected to lead America for a second term. Hillary and Bill Clinton are being re-crafted as moderates, and speculation for a Hillary 2016 presidential run endures whether or not she remains serving as President Obama’s Secretary of State. It’s upside down. Americans deserve to know what happened in their White House and they have been lied to. Americans deserve to know what is happening in their White House now and always and they are still being lied to with no accountability or consequence in sight.

This must end—now.

As President John F. Kennedy said during a speech in New York entitled, “The President and the Press,” on April 27, 1961, “The very word ‘secrecy’ is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it … Without debate, without criticism, no administration, and no country can succeed, and no republic can survive.”


As promised, back to the present but keep in mind the previous POTUS’s shenanigans, just 17 yrs ago. And just substitute a POTUS who chased skirts marathon-like…parsed the truth via ‘what is the meaning of is’ (you can’t make this stuff up)…to the current Liar-in-Chief who swings the other way…but lies like a drunken sailor too. 

And one needn’t be a cynic nor a skeptic to wonder: who the hell is this man-child? –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/04/who-is-barack-hussein-obama-and-what-is-he-hiding-reggie-love-his-down-low-lifestyle-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Nor, does one have to be more than basically curious to question: what really went on at Rev Wrights’s ‘Church’? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/03/the-down-low-potus-and-rev-wrights-guiding-hand-trinity-churchs-many-secrets-stripped-naked-addendum-to-mysterious-deaths-never-far-from-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutn/.

And all these logical questions lead straight to some very mysterious deaths, each one less than six degrees separated from the Thug-in-Chief – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/17/mysterious-deaths-never-far-from-barack-hussein-obama-bad-luck-or-something-more-you-decide-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-66-2/…leaving folks to ponder: is it plain bad luck or something more?

Yet tied into all the questions is the underlying subtext: which way does the POTUS lean? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/24/what-constitutes-mysterious-deaths-under-the-obama-regime-whether-sexually-related-or-otherwise-addendum-to-mysterious-deaths-never-far-behind-from-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina/ …and this is not a reference to his political persuasion!

Most significantly, living in a democracy mandates citizens to keep a watchful eye over their leaders. And it is this obligation which not only keeps renegade leaders at bay but also allows for liberty to exist.

Nothing is for free, least of all freedom. And if most believe that the price is too high, then surely tyranny will prevail. The choice is yours.