PAR for the course – even after the Islamic beheading in Oklahoma – a full court press via the leftist media, Obama Inc.’s mouthpieces and CAIR tag-teamed to disconnect any linkage with Islam to the latest act of barbarism. A Herculean and impossible feat, yet they never waver in their (spin) mission. Not even for a nanosecond. But never mind, Megyn Kelly – in the above video interview – castrated the latest Islamist at hand.
TO understand what is taking place – and in order to fight back effectively – one must study CAIR and its bullying tactics. Leave it to two women, the aforementioned Megyn Kelly and Brooke Goldstein – hot looking babes to boot – to lend hammer blows to CAIR’s lying mouthpieces. You go, girls!!
SIGNIFICANTLY, CAIR’s main goal is to stop the west from exposing the brutality of Islam under Shariah law. Their main tool is the weapon of “Islamophobia”. Though already dispelled as a bugaboo, it has been very effective as a silencing technique, at least for the easily intimidated. In fact, just recently, a main contact received the following missive, a clear cut warning:
xxxx the attached document is an active case in which you and your kind such as xxxx will soon face under the hammer of the law. A case we brought up long ago, one you have never been aware of.Not only is this now an active case in America but throughout the world for the last two years. A case which we brought up in every country.This is just the start. Today we decided to let you become aware of it.
Now that you know, I think you should also know that this document is old, our interaction with higher law making authorities now have you under surveillance for inciting acts of terrorism against Muslims.By Law “Islamophobia is Illegal”Sent from my BlackBerry®
KID you not. And for good measure, this particular MB jihadist – one who reportedly serves as a mouthpiece for certain Brotherhood players – added the following warnings, feigning his “faith” in America as a diverse nation built upon freedom of religion! Oh joy…
Bismillahir’RahmaanNir’Raheem (In the Name of Allah, The Most Gracious, The Most Merciful)
To whom it may concern…
Firstly I would like to begin with the Islamic Greeting of As’SalaamuAlaikumWa’RahmatullahiWa’Barakatu (May Peace, God’s Mercy and Blessings be upon you)
This letter serves as a request by THE UNITED MUSLIM NATIONS INTERNATIONAL organization to the AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION to bring into effect an effort for a “total ban” on religious Defamation by News Media outlets throughout the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, this request covers all religions and not just the religion of Islam. However we will emphasize on Islamophobic News Media and shed light on the dangers that come with it and why the ACLU needs to take up this case with the utmost urgency.
For instance we want a ban on the highly offensive and defamatory terms such as “Islamist Militants” and “Militant Islam”, we also do not want to see such terminology being used for other faiths.
Our second request is directed at the American Civil Liberties Union itself and we would like to receive a documented response from the ACLU as to whether the ACLU condones or condemns, agrees or disagrees with Religious defamation by linking religion to militant activities. This response should be sent to the UMN Intl for the attention of xxxx
We are asking that Media Outlets refrain from linking Militant activities with a religious undertone. This kind of religious undertones to militant/ terrorist activities are unacceptable and unjustifiable. Such linkages with religion we do not find in the reports concerning Militants/ Terrorists from other faiths such as the case with Anders Breivick a Christian who is a Terrorist, he set off explosives at Government Installations in Norway and killed scores of Civilians with Automatic Rifles due to his perceived Crusade against Muslims. The very man made reference to known Right-Wing Think Tanks and Islamophobic Bloggers in his online manifesto known for their Campaign of Fear mongering to fan fear of Muslims in America and abroad. We believe those whom he mentioned in his manifesto should be questioned by Law Enforcement for inciting violence and acts of terrorism both domestically and foreign. More information on this can be obtained from the Centre for American Progress (CAP) who conducted a full scale investigation and released a 130 or 140 paged report thereon called Fear inc: The Roots of Islamophobia in America. You may also request for more information from the Security Sector namely the CIA’s Specialists on Terrorism who would gladly advise that Religion plays no role in Middle Eastern conflicts nor anywhere else in the world.
We also don’t find news media labelling Buddhists as terrorists for their acts of violence and ethnic cleansing of the hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Burma, or Christians as Terrorists for their ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Central African Republic, nor illegal Jewish settlers for their daily killings of Palestinians in Palestine, nor do we hear the same religious connotations for the killing of the ethnic Huihui (Muslims of China) by the Haan Chinese and other parts of the world.
Media outlets have made it a common trend to single out Islam through bias reporting standards which are not accurate nor fair. We suggest that the Media outlets refrain from the use of the phrases “Islamist Militants or Militant Islam” when they are reporting on militant/ terrorist activities, but rather use the names of the militant groups such as Al Qaeda or al Shabaab or Boko Haram and say al Qaeda militants instead of defaming Islam as they do for all other faiths.
There is no such thing as Militant Islam there is only Islam as taught and practiced by the noble prophet Mohammed SallallahuAlaihiWa’salaam (peace be upon him). We want to solidify a ban on such religious defamation so that in future no people’s religious beliefs will be placed under such a vicious and unacceptable attack and this is a request for the protection of the religious liberty for peoples of all faiths.
Now the reasons for why the ACLU needs to take up this matter with the utmost urgency.
Our Organization the UMN Intl holds some Media outlets responsible for the rise in Islamophobic Violence within America and abroad, the ACLU we believe needs to take a serious look at the following facts.
Islamophobic Violence has reached alarming rates on a Global Scale where many of these attacks on Muslims (as well as non-Muslims) have led to a number of deaths within America and elsewhere. Some of these attacks are more than what some term as hate crimes but are in fact Terrorist attacks on Muslims and others who are not part of the Islamophobic Network. The Islamophobic Network seeks a clash of Civilizations. The ACLU need to at least try and place pressure on News Media outlets to refrain from the use of such defamatory terms and instead be accurate and fair. We expect News Media to use the names of the persons or groups responsible for acts of violenceand not blame religion. We are asking that the ACLU defend the religious liberty of all Americans
The main factor apart from this being a case of highly offensive Religious Defamation this is in fact something to be probed due to the fact that it has been a cause of deaths within America and elsewhere.
In Germany a pregnant Muslim woman took an Islamophobe to court for harassment, inside the court of law the Islamophobe Stabbed her to death and when her husband tried to defend her he was the one who got shot by the cops.
In South Africa a young Muslim Man named FayazKazi was beaten to death by two Islamophobes just because he was a Muslim and had a beard. Other cases in South Africa are of Somali’s having been stoned to death by Islamophobes and their businesses ransacked.
In America there have been reports of attacks on perceived Muslims, namely indianShikhs and some of these attacks have resulted in deaths. Muslims in America also face religious and racial profiling.
The list of Islamophobic Violence which has resulted in a number of deaths from all over the world is mounting, we are fighting an Islamophobic Pandemic of some sort and are dealing with Organizations just like the ACLU and others in a number of countries, if the ACLU could bring this to the attention of the National Security Agencies and the Justice Department as well then perhaps we would achieve a great stride in securing the safety of American Muslims as well as non-Muslim Americans and avoid any reprisal attacks due to Islamophobic Violence. It is only natural for a people who face attacks and persecution to respond on a defensive and in some cases it may lead to armed confrontations. This is what we’re trying to prevent. Truth honesty and peace should prevail.Islamophobia is one of the greatest threats to Americas National Security.
We ask that the ACLU grant the Islamophobic Networks the freedom to express their standing freely as we believe this will only expose their sinister plans further. Any opposition should have the right to voice their views for us this is an easy way for you to identify truth from falsehood so that justice may prevail. We want the Islamophobic Networks to be held responsible in a court of law for their incitement towards violence and for their part in spurring on domestic terrorist groups and those beyond the American borders. Muslim Americans rights and freedoms are being violated if the NSA needs to spy and collect information they should start with the Islamophobic Networks who are no different than the al Qaeda groups. Look at how the NYPD violated the rights of Muslims by spying on people because of religious affiliation? That is unacceptable.
The United States of America, such a beautiful name for a country yet ever more being divided by intolerant Religion Racists. It would truly be a sad moment in Americas history to see the fall of its religious liberty due to an extremist Islamophobic Network.We believe a legal probe into the activities of the Islamophobic Networks would unearth shocking truths about the dangers it presents to Americas National Security. Should an Islamophobe assume the political dictatorship of Americas foreign policy then their dreams of Armageddon would soon become a reality or even the possibility of civil war.
This case will be a battle for the preservation of Americas Constitutional commitment to religious liberty for all.
It is well known that America is a Diverse and beautiful country due to that wealth of diversity. From the beginning of Americas history, religious liberty has been at the heart of the American vision of democratic freedom. Within the civic framework provided by the U.S. Constitution, religion has long played an important role in American public life, without being enforced or controlled by government. Islamophobic Networks within America want to derail that religious liberty which is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution these individuals and groups have attempted to conflate all of Islam with extremist violence by disseminating misinformation and distortions about Islam and American Muslims. This propaganda against Islam has led to a rise in discrimination and attacks against American Muslims and those perceived to be Muslims, attacks on American Muslim institutions, and protests against the building of mosques in local communities. The UMN Intl does not ignore or minimize the significant threat posed by extremists who promote and commit unacceptable and unjustifiable acts of violence in the name of Islam. We fully recognize the challenge to peace and justice posed by small factions within Islam who lift up extremist theology and pervert our faith to support their violence. All of the world’s major religions currently face similar challenges. But acts of violence by radical individuals and groups must not be used to condemn Islam itself – or to paint all Muslims with the brush of extremism.
The Religion Clauses of the First Amendment guarantee religious liberty, or freedom of conscience, for all Americans — people of all faiths and none.
The Establishment Clause bars the government from advancing or inhibiting religion and ensures that government remains neutral.
The Free Exercise Clause and supporting laws, like the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, protect the right of religious individuals and institutions to follow their conscience in matters of faith.
Under the Free Exercise Clause as currently interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court, government may not enact laws or regulations that target religious practice without demonstrating a compelling state interest and no less restrictive means of accomplishing that interest. When laws or policies apply to everyone and don’t target religious practices, but nonetheless burden those practices, the government is not required to justify such burdens with a compelling interest. The high court has also established that government may choose to afford religious liberty greater protection — an authority that is frequently exercised.
The twin constitutional guarantees of religious freedom for all citizens are good for religion and good for government.
The civic framework of religious freedom defined by the First Amendment enables people of all faiths and none to live together as equal citizens of one nation. Like other First Amendment freedoms, the rights to exercise one’s faith and to be free from governmental establishments of religion are fundamental rights that cannot be denied by majority vote or elections.
A majority may not impose its religious values on others, nor limit minority religious rights. The fact that a majority of Americans do not share the beliefs of a minority faith does not make those beliefs and practices any less protected. Unless all Americans are assured of religious freedom, the freedom of all Americans is in question.
A’uthubillahi mina’ Shaytaannir’Rageem (I seek refuge in Allah from Satan the accursed devil)
THE UNITED MUSLIM NATIONS INTERNATIONAL hereby gives mandate to the Council on American Islamic Relations to act as our legal and or political representative specifically for this case and may be accompanied by any Muslim Lawyers Association or Freedom and Equality Advocacy Group such as:
MIND you, in juxtaposition, the aforementioned (an MB mouthpiece, who, for now, shall remain nameless ) wants to impose an omerta on Islam in America! In other words, he sees no sense of irony to their plan, one which exhorts to institute the Shariah imposed law of blasphemy, in a country built upon free speech! What a conundrum….
BUT unexpectedly – and in a welcome twist – as much as U.S./western academia prop up Islamists in their mission to destroy western civilization via the red/green alliance, a principled prof – an oxymoron, in and of itself – comes to light. Now, while the email below took place in 2006, the fact of the matter is that it is just as relevant today – even more so – than it was 8 years ago. The academic cesspool has gotten worse, if you dare imagine. If added evidence is needed, look no further than to Yale Law’s latest “guest”. Btw, whether the aiding and abetting takes place in the grad or undergrad departments, it matters not a whit. What matters IS that U.S. (western) academia is giving “kosher” seals of approval to genocidal Islamic haters!
Apparently Hitler wasn’t available.
Al-Ghannouchi’s upcoming appearance at the Ivy League school could become controversial given the sheik’s longtime support for radical terror groups and his past calls for Muslims to wage “unceasing war against the Americans.”
The sheik’s violent rhetoric, radical leanings, and endorsement of Hamas led him to be banned from entering the United States for a time.
Genocidal Ghannouchi goes even further than that.
Sheikh Rashid Ghannouchi, of Tunisia’s equally moderate Islamist Ennahda Movement, said, “There are no civilians in Israel. The population—males, females and children—are the army reserve soldiers, and thus can be killed.”
I’m sure that an honest lecture from GG on Islamic law would be enlightening, but like his Muslim Brotherhood pals, the Sheik knows how to modify his rhetoric now that he and his murderous Islamist party are in power in Tunisia.
ONTO the righteous email….a needle in a haystack…
Subject: FW: Michigan professor sent an e-mail telling Muslim students to leave the country.
GO, MICHIGAN STATE !
Very interesting — the University is standing by their professor and not bowing down to special interest groups!
Professor Wichman E-mail
Claim: A Michigan professor sent an e-mail telling Muslim students to leave the country.
The story begins at Michigan State University with a mechanical engineering professor named IndredWichman.
Wichman sent an e-mail to the Muslim Student’s Association.
The e-mail was in response to the students’ protest of the Danish cartoons that portrayed the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist.
The group had complained the cartoons were ‘hate speech.’
Enter Professor Wichman.
In his e-mail, he said the following:
Dear Muslim Association,
As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest.
I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called ‘whores’ in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France.
This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Muslims to be very aware of this as you proceed with your infantile ‘protests.’
If you do not like the values of the West – see the First Amendment – you are free to leave. I hope for God’s sake that most of you choose that option.
Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans.
I. S. Wichman
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
As you can imagine,
The Muslim group at the university didn’t like this too well.
They’re demanding that Wichman be reprimanded, that the university impose mandatory diversity training for faculty,
And mandate a seminar on hate and discrimination for all freshmen.
Now, the local chapter of CAIR has jumped into the fray.
CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, apparently doesn’t believe that the good professor
Had the right to express his opinion.
For its part, the university is standing its ground in support of Professor Wichman,
Saying the e-mail was private, and they don’t intend to publicly condemn his remarks.
BOTTOM LINE: all of their efforts are aimed towards softening up the ground for Islam’s takeover in America, after which the entire west will fall. Ambitious plans but no less true. Their new Islamist political party in America is a testimony to how close they are coming to their goal: the Shariah States of America! Don’t bet against them, you may very well lose your wager.