BUT one only needs to look at his domestic and foreign fires to glean whose side he is on. Yes, his allegiancesbecome overwhelming clear, linkage after linkage, unless one is willfully malignant.
ADDING to his malfeasance, several very recent treacheries stand apart:
TREACHERY ONE:
ON the domestic front, his Congressional (red/green) front arms increasingly empower radical Islamists within Congress. Rep Andre Carson, a devoted Muslim, had this to say:
KNOWING this, one would expect that an American President (Congressional Repubs alike) should block Carson from sitting on ANY intelligence or related homeland security committees. Indeed, the POTUS’s fingerprints are imprinted all over Congress, regardless of the so-called separation of powers.
Pelosi will name Democratic Indiana U.S. Rep. André Carson to the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, it was reported Tuesday.
Carson will be the first Muslim to hold that position. He is one of two Muslims currently in Congress.
Carson has raised eyebrows with some of his past political and religious remarks, and he’s received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign money from groups implicated in terrorism investigations.
Ina May 26, 2012 speech at the 37th Annual Islamic Circle of North America-Muslim American Society Convention in Hartford, Conn., Carson spoke about how Islamic teachings would improve the U.S. education system.
IT is clear as a bell where Carson’s allegiances lie, and the danger he presents. Is it any wonder that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and assorted surrogates) is full square behind his appointment?
TREACHERY TWO:
CONSEQUENTIALLY, while Europe explodes, Islamists in America are not sitting idly by. We know this. Thus, what type of American leader would release the most dangerous terrorists to plot, once again, to kill Americans, his Taliban “trades” included? Rhetorical.
“Freed Gitmo Captive Opens ISIS Base in Afghanistan,” Judicial Watch, January 15, 2015:
As President Obama frees droves of terrorists—including five Yemenis this week—from the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo news reports confirm that a Gitmo alum who once led a Taliban unit has established the first Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) base in Afghanistan.
His name is Mullah Abdul Rauf and international and domestic media reports say he’s operating in Helmand province, actively recruiting fighters for ISIS. Citing local sources, a British newspaper writes that Rauf set up a base and is offering good wages to anyone willing to fight for the Islamic State. Rauf was a corps commander during the Taliban’s 1996-2001 rule of Afghanistan, according to intelligence reports. After getting captured by U.S. forces, he was sent to Gitmo in southeast Cuba but was released in 2007.
Rauf’s Department of Defense Joint Task Force Guantanamo file describes him as being closely associated with several senior level Taliban commanders and leaders. It also says that Rauf admitted involvement in the production and sales of opium as well as associations with criminal elements within the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. From the file: “Due to recent findings that detainee may have had a more important role within the Taliban than previously thought detainee’s intelligence value has been updated from low to medium due to his possible knowledge of: (1) Taliban leadership, (2) Taliban command and control.”
Rauf is one of a number of Gitmo terrorists who have returned to the fight after getting released, yet Obama continues freeing captives to keep his campaign promise of closing the prison. Just this week he let four Yemenis go, despite the risk that they will likely join Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the Yemen-based terror group that claimed responsibility for last week’s attack in France. In fact, dozens of freed Gitmo detainees have rejoined Al Qaeda in Yemen, the country where the 2009 Christmas Day airline bomber proudly trained. In 2010 Judicial Watch reported that a number of high-ranking Al Qaeda militants in Yemen—once held at Gitmo—may have been involved in a sophisticated scheme to send bombs on a U.S.-bound cargo plane….
But his anti-American (western) foreign fires are even more bold-faced, egregiously so, when he thwarts an important Middle East leader from fighting Islamic jihad. In other words, Egypt’s El-Sisi is battling the Muslim Brotherhood and its global arms, all the while the Islamist-in-Chief empowers them, both domestically and worldwide! As demonstrated, each and every jihadi explosion IS linked to one of the Brotherhood Mafia’s tentacles.
In many ways, what el-Sisi did to Obama from a podium at al-Azhar was the political equivalent of what he did by leading the overthrow of Mohammed Mursi in 2013. It was also a speech that created pro-Obama and pro-Sisi camps by providing a stark contrast to the Obama ideology that western leaders like Cameron of the UK, Hollande of France and Merkel of Germany have not.
Days later, on January 7th, it was events that provided even more contrast as Muslim terrorists in Paris murdered people in cold blood for their speech. Western leaders send muddled messages instead of clear ones. The best example can be seen in the much ballyhooed Paris march on January 11th that included Cameron, Hollande and Merkel showing solidarity with Mahmoud Abbas and Turkey’s Ahmet Davutoglu.
Normally reliable conservative Newt Gingrich attempted to put his finger on the problem by going after Obama for not attending the Paris rally. Gingrich concluded Obama is either cowardly or crazy. Neither is correct; Obama is pro-Muslim Brotherhood because his family is part of the organization and Egyptians are the only ones who have been so vocal about this; they also have the proof.
TO further elucidate the stark, ominous, and contrasting worldviews – between the heretofore leader of the free world on the one hand, juxtaposed against Egypt’s El-Sisi’s struggle against the Muslim Brotherhood via Islam’s global thrust – look no further than to Israel’s foremost strategic policy analyst, Dr. Martin Sherman, a close contact.
HIS most recent Jerusalem Post column is more than noteworthy:
MOST significantly, Americans, westerners alike, must understand that behind EVERY Sunni Islamic group beats a Brotherhood linked group. Moreover, don’t waste your energy separating the Sunni from the Shia, as long as America, the west, is the target. Yes, Shias also FULLY cooperate with Sunni Brotherhood jihadists. Shia Iran facilitated, plotted and gave cover to Sunni Al Qaeda to bring about 9/11/01, as delineated within a federal district court ruling in the Havlish decision. Their jihadi cooperation has nothing to do with their centuries long inter-tribal warfare. Historically, just as long as the west is the target, their hegemonic struggles are (temporarily) cast aside. Never forget this.
BUT think of it this way: what would have happened to the leader of the free world during WW 2, had he aligned the nation with the Nazi war machine, instead of siding with western powers?
HINT: he would not have lasted 24 hours in office, and that would have been for starters. His days would have been numbered, literally. Capital punishment-like.
THE urgent question becomes: why are millions of patriotic Americans allowing (by not surrounding the White House via their absolute right to democratically protest – however long it takes – they give him their consent) the Traitor-in-Chief to form an alliance with the Islamic axis?
FIRST and foremost, let us all agree on the most intrinsic basis for survival: the underpinnings of democracy are not meant to be suicide pacts ! Period. Don’t ever forget this western pact. Imperative. Alas, even if too many multicultural fantasists interpret freedom of religion – a core western component – as a “legitimate” veil to hide behind, rolling over and giving in is NEVER an option. Not on this watch….
IMAGINE, if you will, millions of Jews and Christians slaughtering everyone who offends their religious sensitivities. In fact, there would be so many dead bodies that cemeteries, the size of football fields, would have to be built – world over – to house the corpses!
IT is precisely for this reason why two twin myths have to be shattered. Obliterated. Post haste. That is, if America (the west will not survive without America as a bulwark, similarly, sans Israel standing strong against Islamic jihad…twin pillars) is to survive the upcoming onslaught of perpetually aggrieved Muslims, westerners need to get with the program. Besides, when are they NOT “offended”?
MYTH ONE:
SO, let’s cut to the heart of the matter and bust open the most DANGEROUS myth, “Islam is a religion of peace”. It is beyond mendacious. It is perhaps the biggest lie on the world stage, and that is saying something. Thus, repeat ad nausea:
The viewpoint of ISIS echos throughout the Islamic world. Mawlana Abul Ala Mawdudi, founder of Pakistan’s Islamic Fundamentalist Movement, which boasts hundreds of thousands of members, spoke openly and honestly about the religion of Islam.
“Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam doesn’t care about the land or who own the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy.”
MOHAMMAD HI-JACKED ISLAM!
ON the other hand, its basis is “religious” in nature, but it was conceived to be used as a bludgeon, against all those who refuse to fall in line with a totalitarian political doctrine, albeit cloaked within a religious basis. Sounds Orwellian? Well, regardless, it is the truth.
PAY strict heed to Ayann Hirsi, a Somali (former) Muslim. Yes, there are scores of irrefutable proofs to back up the following:
MYTH one leads straight into myth two…..1 + 1… (a + b) equation-like.
THUS, it has been established (above, within this site, and elsewhere) that Islam’s basis is totalitarian, to be utilized as a political tool of war, with an end point to submit all to Allah. In factual reality, the actual meaning of Islam = submit, in accordance with Quran Sunnah Educational Programs. Hmmm…
Q: Please, illustrate to me the meaning of Islam.
A: Islam means total submission to Allah (Exalted be He) through belief in His Oneness, and showing subservient and servile obedience to Him. This is the meaning of Islam.
IN this regard, multiculti brayers continuously opine: why shouldn’t Muslims be free to build mosques within the west – just like other religions – if said nations are to uphold the mantle of democracy? A fair question, but only if one didn’t know what’s what.
INTRINSICALLY, their war plans are STRATEGIZED within their mosques (besides, this site’s counter jihad contacts have documented evidence of said charges, so, don’t even try to argue otherwise) and PREACHED inside their “religious” confines! The proofs are manifest and grave. Book-worthy.
BUT just as foretastes, the following should suffice:
AS mentioned below – in reference to the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history – Dar al-Hijrah, in Falls Church, Virginia (out of scores of others throughout the U.S.) openly calls for armed jihad within America !
“Muslim men when it is a price to pay, they are first in line,” Elsayed said in comments seen on a YouTube video found by the Creeping Sharia blog. “They are the first in the prayer line. They are the first in the zakat (charity) line. They are the first in the hajj line. They are the first in the clean-up line. They are the first in the community-service line. They are the first in jihad line. They are the first in the da’wa line.”
“But they are last if anything is being distributed, unless it is arms for jihad,” Elsayed said. “We are the first to rush and run to defend our community and defend ourselves. The enemies of Allah are lining up; the question for us is, ‘Are we lining, or are we afraid because, because they may call us terrorists.'”
Being called “terrorists” should not matter to Muslims because Muslims are being called terrorists anyway, Elsayed said.
“You are a terrorist because you are a Muslim,” Elsayed said. “Well give them a run for their money. Make it worth it. Make this title worth it, and be good a Muslim.”
Elsayed then told Muslims to accept peace when they receive peace, but to fight back when their families, communities, nations and dignity come under attack.
He has been Dar al-Hijrah’s imam since 2005. Law enforcement officials have described the mosqueas being “associated with Islamic extremists” and “operating as a front for Hamas operativesin U.S….His name also appears in a 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document detailing the group’s plan to wage a non-violent civilization jihad to destroy “Western civilization from within.”
AT the very least, if anything, wouldn’t it make sense for Americans to immediately follow what a Mayor from Italy has done, a town leader who finally realizes that mosques are (beyond) a dagger to the hearts of non-Muslim citizens!
EXTRAPOLATING further, before it is too late, those already built will need to be demolished, brick by brick, not unlike forward command centers when waging war against ones enemies!
CONCOMITANTLY, doesn’t it flow (from all of the above) that followers of Islam, Muslims, within Congress (and other western representative bodies) evince a clear and present danger? If not, why not?
Carson told “America will never tap into educational innovation and ingenuity without looking at the model that we have in our madrassas, in our schools, where innovation is encouraged, where the foundation is the Quran.”
My guess is that if a Christian Congressman made the same statement indicating Bible-study class, you’d be hearing about it in a more fanatical fashion from the mainstream press. But I digress… Do you believe the comments by Carson raises any red flags? No? Well then how about this:
At the same conference, Carson also made a dire warning to U.S. undercover law enforcement: “Allah will not allow you to stop us.”
André Carson will soon sit in on meetings where some of America’s most precious secrets are examined because Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is set to appoint him to the House Intelligence Committee…..keep reading….
“HOLY” jihad….
COUNTLESS tools – aside from frontal bloody jihad, the most obvious – are utilized to bring down America, their prime target. In the Brotherhood Mafia’s own words: “their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands….”
AND it matters not a whit which Muslim Brotherhood front group is the main engine to this and that act of jihad. The CENTRAL fact remains that “the mosques are their barracks, the domes are their helmets, the minarets are their bayonets, and the faithful are their soldiers”!
BOTH in words and deeds, be it frontal or stealth, the Muslim Brotherhood are plotting jihad. Moreover, as mentioned, at the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history, evidence was tied to front group after front group, and to mosque after mosque. Not only that, Dar Al-Hijrah stands out as a forerunner – “Federal investigators found Akram’s memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrahmosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had created to support Hamas in the United States.”
Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram’s 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”
An archived page of the MAS website from 2003 – smack dab in the middle of Elsayed’s tenure there – states the following:
The call and the spirit of the movement reached the shores of North America with arrival of the Muslim student and immigrants in the late 50’s and early 60’s. These early pioneers and Islamic Movement followers established in 1963. Muslim Student Association (MSA) of U.S and Canada as the rallying point in their endeavor to serve Islam and Muslims in the North America scene. Other services and outreach organization soon followed, such as North America Islamic Trust (NAIT), Islamic MedicalAssociation (IMA), Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA) and Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA),to name a few.
REALISTICALLY, Americans (westerners) must understand this ominous fact: the multiple pronged attacks in Paris were precursors/forerunners for the “ready, set, go….blow” attacks within the U.S. The hidden jihadi cells, all over America, are likely to piggyback onto a few more “successful” strikes within Europe. However, as mentioned, Europe is their “testing ground”. Pointedly, the following, from Debkafile Intelligence, should serve as more than “background noise”: Europe rounds up 25 jihadi suspects.
HOW much clearer does it need to be to tie U.S. mosques (similarly, all over the west) into “barracks preparing for war”? And knowing this, isn’t it a matter of national survival, an imperative, to call for their elimination? Or, on the other hand, has democracy become a western suicide pact?
IF not, listen up to this site’s valued contact, Tom Trento, via his latest counter jihad show –
NATIONAL SECURITY TIGER TEAM PRESENTS THE ‘SECURE FREEDOM STRATEGY’ FOR VICTORY OVER THE GLOBAL JIHAD MOVEMENT !
BE that as it may, when this investigative journalist started digging, thus, reporting on this and that, leftists went nuts, and even some who should have known better were more than disparaging. In fact, any reference to “The One” being a “closet” Muslim, well, that sent them over the edge.
AS if on (musical) cue, his spinmeisters immediately went into full overdrive….yada, yada, blah, blah…no, he didn’t mean it THAT way! Oh dear. Yes, almost like a “catch me if you can”…a cat and mouse, in your face, and up yours scenario.
For several years I have been asked the question on the matter of President Obama being a Muslim or not. My standard answer has always been that since Obama’s father was Muslim, so in accordance with Islam he is Muslim. Did he leave the faith of Islam at some point? This is the question many of us have had. Of course if he left Islam then he would be considered an apostate. I think it is time leading counter-terrorism folks and the media start giving clear and precise answers in regards to what their professional opinion in about Obama being a Muslim.It is my analysis that Obama never left the Islamic faith and is a strong and active Sunni Muslim, but of course for political reasons he can’t openly admit he is Muslim. Obama is living true Islam: deceit and hypocrisy.There are several key reasons I have come to the conclusion and can go on record that it is my professional opinion Obama is an active Sunni Muslim (Salafist).
They are:
1. During the Presidential election in 2007 and leading up to his being sworn in to office in Jan 2008, Obama/his staff visited CAIR National in Washington DC on at least two occasions. I had two female researchers inside CAIR National when his team visited CAIR executives. They provided statements in regards to the above.{blogger’s note: Obama had NO idea that undercover operatives were recording this and that, as revealed within Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America}
2. It is well-known CAIR leaders are Sunni Muslim (Salfist/Wahhabe). The mosques CAIR sponsors/supports is Dar Al Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, Virginia. Leaders from this mosque frequent CAIR national as well. This mosque is a strong Salafist mosque with close ties to Saudi Arabia. Muslims have told me they call this area the ‘Wahhabe Nation of America’.3. Since Obama took office he has went above and beyond to support the Muslim Brotherhood and protect the reputation of Prophet Muhammed and the Islamic ideology.4. It is no coincidence that Obama has invited Al Sharpton to the White House almost 80 times. CAIR National selected Sharpton as their ‘Man of the Year’. Since our book ‘Muslim Mafia’ was released in 2009, the FBI was directed to have no contact with CAIR because of their ties to Islamic based terrorism. Sharpton is now CAIR’s direct contact into the White House with Obama and Eric Holder (U.S. Attorney).5. Obama’s foreign and domestic policies have always been more aligned with Sharia law than the U.S. Constitution.6. Obama has had Muslim Brotherhood meetings and supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Eqypt. Even the UAE has admitted CAIR is a terrorist organization.
7. Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia.
8. Obama did not attend the peace rally in Paris because the theme was targeted toward ‘Radical Islamic based terrorism’. Of course Obama could not support this because he does not feel the Muslims carrying out terrorist acts are radical. He believes they are carrying out the plans of Muhammed as Islam dictates.
9. Obama has released numerous terrorists from GITMO. Anyone with a basic understanding of national security knows these prisoners being released are a serious national security threat.
People will say that Obama is killing Islamic terrorist fighters in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq, so if he is Muslim why is he doing this? People must understand the implementation of the Islamic caliphate will take many years. Muslims are taught from birth to support the progression of Islam, even through deceit and giving their life.
It is my analysis Obama has used the U.S. to attack Islamic terrorists for propaganda purposes. They are simply collateral damage for the betterment of Islam. Anything is allowed in Islam if it strengthens Islam and leads to the formation of the caliphate worldwide. It must be noted his attacks in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, are very limited and do little damage.
For many yearsthe U.S. government provided me the highest clearances and paid me a good salary to analyze national security issues. Many of my classified reports were sent via the ‘Blue Line’ which meant they were briefed to the U.S. President. I had a solid track record of being on target with my security analysis inputs. I have no doubt I am correct when I go on record now as saying that President Obama is an active Sunni Muslim (Salafist). The next two years under Obama will be used to destroy America from the inside.
AND those of us who fully understand what is at stake, willing to state the G-d’s honest truth – whether we live in America, Israel or any western nation worth a damn – surely can agree with the following too: to save the planet, the west has to kill the Muslim Third Reich!
BUT for knuckledraggers who still require edification, some intellectual heft, this site presents one of its esteemed professorial associates, Professor Paul Eidelberg.
(Arabic Grand Mufti of Jerusalem with Bosnian Muslim SS-soldiers)
The Connection Between Islam and Nazism: What is to Be Done?
Paul Eidelberg and Will Morrisey
Winston Churchill defined Mein Kampf as “the new Koran of faith and war.”[1] Consistent therewith, Haj Amin al-Husseini, the notorious former Mufti of Jerusalem, declared, “There is a definite similarity between the principles of Islam and the principles of Nazism.”
Although Hitler and Muhammad shared an enthusiasm for military adventurism and a hatred of Jews, still, their world views would seem to be diametrically opposed. Let us see.
Hitler grounds his Jew-hatred in racism as well as atheism. His Jew-hatred flows from the sewers of nineteenth-century ‘race theory.’ Its calculated blasphemy, its materialism (despite Hitler’s self-described ‘idealism’), and most obviously its idolatry of a ‘master race,’ ought to offend, and deeply offend, any serious student of the Koran. Islam calls for the conversion of all ‘races’ to Islam, and it does much more than merely call for such conversion—it conquers for it. Moreover, the insistent legalism of Islam sets strict limits on any would-be tyrant. To be sure, Islam is ‘totalistic,’ as are most religions. Islam seeks to explain and to regulate all of human life. This suggests that Islam is ‘totalitarian.’ Various scholars—Bernard Lewis and Daniel Pipes among them—deny this.[2]
One may indeed conclude that Islam is not ‘totalitarian’ in the modern sense, since modern totalitarianism involves the all-encompassing power of the state and the exaltation of its leader. Hence it can be said that might does not make right for the Muslim, as it does for the Nazi, the Communist, or the Fascist. Besides, is it not obvious that for the Muslim God rules, not Hitler or Stalin? It may well be, however, that we are here dealing with half-truths which obscure Islam’s linkage to Nazism.
What links Islam to Nazism is the ethos of jihad. For both Islam and Nazism war is not merely a means to an end: mere conquest. War for both is a moral imperative: for the Nazi, to purge the world of racial impurity, for the Muslim, to purge the world of religious impurity. Both have or require an enemy: for the Muslim the ‘infidel,’ for the Nazi the ‘Jew,’ Accordingly, both Islam and Nazism aim at purifying i.e. conquering the world, and there is no limit to the violence that may be used to achieve that aim. The genocide perpetrated by Muslims against the Armenians preceded the genocide the Nazis perpetrated against the Jews.
The Nazis regarded the Jews as a virus infecting mankind, something that had to be exterminated. Although Muslims reject this racism—for a Jew could convert to Islam—Islam’s contempt for non-believers has much in common with the Nazi’s contempt for non-Aryans, Jews in particular. As in Nazism, Islam has never respected the sanctity of human life; it has always regarded infidels, Jews or Christians, as devoid of human rights—as subhuman. Bat Ye’or has documented fourteen centuries of dhimmitude—the degradation and dehumanization of countless Jews and Christians.[3]Dhimmitude is inherent in the ethos of jihad—the most distinctive principle of Islam.
Also inherent in the ethos of jihad, but which has no parallel in Nazism, is the will to martyrdom. The most horrific manifestation of this jihad ethos is the homicide-suicide bomber. Islam may forbid what may be termed ‘personal’ suicide but not in the ethos of holy war. That Arab parents can exult in their children being sacrificed as human bombs is of course mind-boggling. This pagan-like phenomenon indicates that the sanctity of human life is not a normative Islamic doctrine. Indeed, on page after page of the Koran¸ unbelievers are consigned to Hell—Islam’s crematoria.
If the will to martyrdom is construed in terms of sacrificing the individual for the sake of the community, then Islam converges with Nazism. While Muslims exalt the umma, the Islamic nation, Nazis exaltthe volk, the Aryan race. Lost in both is the dignity of the individual.
In Jewish law the individual stands on a par with the community, and such is his infinite worth or dignity that he cannot rightly be sacrificed for the sake of his community. (That Nazism regards Jews as ‘selfish’ should be understood in this light.) The dignity of the individual has no other rational source than the Torah’s conception of man’s creation in the image of God. Adam is an individual. It follows, given Islam’s subordination of the individual to the collective, that Islam, like Nazism, rejects the God of the Bible! The same God also creates diverse nations, which attests to His infinite creativity. Both Islam and Nazism reject the existence of diverse nations. Both would impose on mankind a stultifying uniformity.
The contrast with Judaism could hardly be more striking. Aside from the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality, Judaism insists on differentiation and individuation. One nation should not impose order on others by erasing their salutary national differences. Diversity in unity, reflected in the twelve distinctive tribes of Israel, is a basic Torah principle.[4]
Militant nations cannot tolerate much diversity, especially where the militancy is animated by a creed or ideology as in Islam and Nazism. In the case of Islam, its extraordinary military success and global expansion during the first hundred years of its inception was perceived by Muslims as ‘proof’ of Islam’s validity and superiority. Might did indeed make right, in Islamic history. In fact, according to Islamic doctrine, the mere seizure of state power gives religious authority to its leader even if he is not a devout Muslim.
The ethos of jihad has an ethics which is quite pragmatic, as one may expect from a militaristic religion. One might go so far as to say that Nazi militarism is jihad secularized—jihad without religious pretensions and obfuscations. Although literary Islam and Nazism have profound differences, these are of little significance to the victims of these militant doctrines. The one reduces human beings to dhimmis, the other to slaves. Militarism in a religious as well as in an atheistic creed means expansionism, murder, and degradation.
In Islam, as well as in Christianity, belief in its founder is part of the creed. The Jews have suffered the consequences of rejecting both. Many if not most Christians have forgiven the Jews for their stubborn adherence to Judaism, a religion that does not proselytize and that seeks not external glory but internal perfection. The Jewish rejection of Muhammad always rankled Muslims and aroused their hatred. But with the progress of Zionism, the Balfour Declaration, and especially with the rebirth of Israel, fear began to take hold of Muslim clerics and rulers. So long as Jews were dhimmis, Muslims did not feel threatened theologically or politically. This is no longer the case, which is why Muslim leaders throughout the world have held conferences to confront the ‘Jewish and Zionist menace’ and have issued papers which could have been written by Nazis.
Consider, for example, a 1968 international conference of Arab theologians held at Cairo’s Al Azhar University—Islam’s most authoritative university. The mufti of Lebanon referred to the Jews as the “dogs of humanity.” They do not even constitute a true people or nation. Their evilness has been transmitted throughout their history by means of their cultural inheritance. By their behavior, the Jews have called forth the hatred and persecution of all the peoples with whom they have come into contact. They deserve their fate. As for the State of Israel, it is the culmination of the historical and cultural depravity of the Jews. It must be destroyed, having been established through aggression which is its congenital and immutable nature. This must be achieved by jihad.[5]
The participants at this conference make no distinction between Judaism and Zionism. Their virulent statements against Jews and the State of Israel point to nothing less than genocide and politicide.
For decades Muslim anti-Semitism, worldwide, has outpaced those of the neo-Nazis; “what was historically a Christian phenomenon”—largely transcended—“is now primarily a Muslim phenomenon.”[6]“The mounting scale and sheer extent of this vehemently anti-Semitic literature and commentary in the newspapers, journals, magazines, radio, television, and in the everyday life of the Middle East [is indescribable] …”[7] Not only is Mein Kampf a fast-selling title in the region, but even in Egypt, which has a peace treaty with Israel, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has reappeared on a forty-one part Egyptian television program and in recycled form in Arab print media. And this is actually one of the least toxic of such excrescences. Palestinian Authority TV had this to say about Jews and Judaism: “Their Torah today is just a collection of writings in which those people wrote lies about God, His prophets and His teachings …To their prophets they attribute the greatest crimes: murder, prostitution, and drunkenness. The Jews do not believe in God …” Meanwhile, in countless mosques Muslims are poisoned by recent Islamic sermons denigrating Jews:[8]
“Their tongues never cease lying, [disseminating] abomination and obscenity.… The Jews preached permissiveness and corruption, as they hid behind false slogans like freedom and equality, humanism and brotherhood. They kill Muslim youth, entice the [Muslim] woman with shameful deeds, and act to lure others through her. They defile the minds of adolescents by arousing their urges. They are envious of the Muslim woman who conceals herself and protects her honor; for this reason, they preach to her to expose herself and throw off her values. Their goal is to destroy the Muslim family, to shatter religious and social ties and foundations. They are cowards in battle. They flee from death and fear fighting. They love life.”
“Read history and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil forefathers of the even more evil Jews of today: infidels, falsifiers of words, calf worshippers, prophet murderers, deniers of prophecies. The scum of the human race, accursed by Allah, who turned them into apes and pigs. These are the Jews—an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption.”
“The Jews are miserly and enslaved by money.… Most of the world’s wars, particularly the great modern wars, were planned and started by the Jews so as to disseminate corruption in the land, and to achieve their goals on the ruins of the human race.”
“The Jews are defiled creatures and satanic scum…. The Jews are the cause of the misery of the human race …. The Jews are our enemies and hatred of them is in our hearts. Jihad against them is our worship.”
Der Sturmer is tame compared to the anti-Semitic cartoons of the Arab world.[9] Such is their hatred and loathing that Arabs depicts Jews as snakes, dogs, spiders, rats, and locusts.
A chilling example of what this zoomorphism signifies may be gleaned from the Syrian celebration of the tenth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War. In that ceremony, “Syrian militia trainees [male and female] put on a show for Syrian president Hafez Assad. Martial music reached a crescendo as Syrian teenage girls suddenly bit into live snakes [some four or five feet long], repeatedly tearing off flesh and spitting it out as blood ran down their chins. As Assad applauded, the girls then attached the snakes to sticks and grilled them over fire, eating them triumphantly. Others [militiamen] then proceeded to strangle puppies and drink their blood.”[10]
Bearing also in mind that the Syrians exterminated some 18,000 Sunni residents of the city of Hama in 1982 with cyanide—to speak of Arab Nazis is not to succumb to hyperbole.
Some scholars may contend that what has here been imputed to Islam should in truth be imputed to “Islamism.” They allege that Islamism, as distinct from Islam, twists Koranic teachings to un-Koranic uses. The candid scholar will admit that the Koran lends itself to such twists, and much more clearly so viewed from the Sharia, Islamic law. Robert Westrich lists Koranic verses condemning a variety of vices imputed to certain Jews, including falsehood, distortion, cowardice, greed, corruption of Scripture.[11] But the fact that the Koran condemns these vices does not preclude those influenced by the Koran from attributing such vices to the Jews—the more readily so given the Koran’s unrelenting degradation of non-believers. This degradation was canonized by the Umariyah—the legal code of the seventh-century Caliph Umar—which established dhimmitude. That dhimmitude was also construed as an act of charity or patronage hardly minimizes its dehumanization of Jews and Christians under Muslim rule. Indeed, as Bat Ye’or has shown, the condition of the dhimmi was in certain respects inferior to that of a slave.[12]
Turning to the Middle East, if distinctions are to be made between Islam and Islamism, two are in order. First and foremost, Islamism is a rejection of Arab nationalism and, in this respect, a return to classical Islam. However, Islamists have been influenced by modernism, which makes the return to classical Islam impossible. Second, Islamism has adopted the anti-Semitic racism of Nazism.
It is easy to see exactly where Israel stands with respect both to Arab nationalism and Islamism. Arab nationalism was always an instrument of state-builders, just as nationalism had been in Europe. It opposes the imperial state (except when a given nation-state decides to take on an empire), but loyally serves whatever state the state-builders envision. What are the Islamists, but Muslims who seek to seize control of the apparatus of the modern state, which they nonetheless reject as fragmenting the umma?[13]
The existing regimes in the Islamic world are highly unlikely to change (except for the worse) by means of internal forces—‘inside-out.’ Despotism can be quite stable, making victory out of failure. Only a comprehensive geopolitical strategy can transform those regimes, ‘outside-in.’ [According to the first named author of this essay], such a transformation would require the radical transformation of the United States into an all-conquering, benevolent world power – hardly imaginable, unless another 9/11 drove America to desperation, and transformed this complacent democracy into a benevolent universal despotism, something beyond the will and wisdom of the American people, as well as beyond the secular mentality of contemporary political science.◙
DEAR readers, the above brings everything full circle. It is this site’s invaluable gift(s) to you!
MUCH has been written at this site about the bugaboo of “Islamophobia”, and its origins can be found here.
INHERENTLY, it was totally expected that Barack HUSSEIN Obama, immediately after the carnage in Paris, would join the chorus of Sharia Law advocates, citing “Islamophobia” as the exact cause and culprit.
Holder, who will meet with French officials on counter-terrorism, is a big opponent of “Islamophobia” against Muslims.
“There can be no ‘us’ or ‘them’ among Americans,” Holder said at a 2010 dinner held by the California-based group Muslim Advocates. “And I believe that law enforcement has an obligation to ensure that members of every religious community enjoy the ability to worship and to practice their faith in peace, free from intimidation, violence or suspicion. That is the right of all Americans. And it must be a reality for every citizen.”
“We have also strengthened efforts to prevent and combat hate crimes — and to protect American Muslims from acts of violence and discrimination,” Holder said.
“More than ever before, all 94 U.S. Attorneys Offices are partnering with the Department’s Civil Rights Division to act as force multipliers in helping to deliver our nation’s most vital protections to their communities. Just this past Tuesday, nearly a third of the nation’s United States Attorneys gathered in Washington for an unprecedented meeting to work on this issue — and to identify additional ways to strengthen outreach to Muslim and Arab-American communities.”
DE facto, the twisted thinking goes: something has to be done about the (bloody) effects due to “insulting” Muslims – a direct cause of “Islamophobia” – and that is that. SO sayeth the leftist-driven Southern Poverty Law Center, as their columnist railed (back in 2011) in: “Jihad Against Islam”! Whoa…pot kettle…
NOW, within geo-politics, assuredly, little happens in a vacuum. Therefore, it was reported (at this site) ala the “Istanbul Process” – when Clinton was Sec of State–that much Islamic mischief was afoot.Yes, for years, bowing down to Islam has been front and center within Washington’s power centers. However, it has accelerated under the reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
BUT along the lines of never allowing a “crisis to go to waste”, and in tandem with the avowed desire to push through Shariah’s Blasphemy Laws, a tailor-made set of explosions fit the bill.
The OIC’s Ambassador to the United Nations Ambassador Ufuk Gokcen took to twitter and expressed his support for an article that revealed the real reason for Davutoglu’s appearance in the Paris rally.
As Shoebat.com reported, Resolution 16/18 was used as the foundation for the inaugural “Istanbul Process” meeting chaired by Hillary and Davutoglu. The decision to point to the Innocence of Muslims as reason for the Benghazi attacks and riots all across the Middle East was likewise intended to push the “Istanbul Process”.
AS a result of Obama Inc.’s treachery, the Brotherhood’s propaganda arm in America, CAIR, becomes emboldened at every turn, muscling and muzzling this one and that one. Its latest target – FOX News.
COUNTER jihadists, for the most part, understand what needs to be done to beat back Islam’s inroads against the west, but there is some disagreement as to what sits atop the pecking order. Yes, there are several imperatives housed at this site, however, in light of the multifaceted threat level – demonstrably clear through the explosions in Paris – the following is Number One: basically, westerners must cease dealing with Islam’s barbarians though their western prism. Forthwith. Simple as that.
EFFECTIVELY, a mental reversal, a volte-face, is in order, even though it can be very discomfiting. Regardless, the more one understands what makes them tick – culturally, politically and religiously etc – the more equipped one is to counter their inroads. The above is precisely why this site was formed, to act as a repository for said information, plus other (related) matters too. However, countering jihad has always been the focal point.
RESULTANT, in solidarity with the victims in Paris, the signage has become “Je Suis Charlie”. Well and good. This gut level outpouring of western camaraderie, “rallying around” those who were slaughtered, is very important. However, there is a time and place for everything.
KNOW this: in so far as what works, when operating against the jihadi arena, well, “feel good” tactics absolutely, incontrovertibly, miss the most important mark; that which will ACTUALLY keep Islamic jihadists on the run! In reality, they are laughing their (smelly) asses off at emotional displays, what they consider the west’s Achilles heel.
IN this regard, arguably, if the intent is to fight fire with fire – the jury is still out, if westerners are resolved to do so…its leaders certainly aren’t – and demonstrate fierce resolve against the imposition of Shariah Law, sentimental identification with victims of jihad is viewed as a TOTAL sign of weakness by Islamists, whether they are of Arab origin or any other background in between.
THE point being, if the leadership amassed in Paris had any backbone (let alone requisite clues how to counter jihad) they would have taken a polar opposite approach. Concomitantly, different “marching orders” would have filtered down to the millions of marchers, and the leaders would have set the tone, even if many decided to go their own way. Moreover, westerners congregating at social media (and elsewhere) would have picked up on this new assertive stance. Most importantly, the jihadists would have as well!
NEVERTHELESS, it is not too late to turn things around, though the window of opportunity is closing fast. Precipitous. Basically, all the signage, henceforth, must be to render Muhammed in all his barbaric and perverse ignominy, leaving aside the natural inclination towards sentimentality, at least for this part of the global struggle.
TO wit, such steadfast, massive resolve would signal to those who only respect STRENGTH and RESOLVE that the drumbeat against them will go on and on and on…
MOST significantly, the back door to implanting Blasphemy, Shariah Law’s silencing of all anti-Islamic speech, becomes a byproduct of “Islamophobia”. Voila. After all, only “Islamophobes” speak out against Islam/Muhammed, so if they are silenced, well, the bloodshed will cease. Do non-halal pigs fly too?
THEREBY, as Barack HUSSEIN Obama, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) at the U.N., and worldwide Shariah Law proponents advocate, the overriding “necessity” of Shariah Law’s Blasphemy dictates become self-evident. Indeed, the aforementioned muzzles become the only tool capable of guarding global “peace”. A perverse inversion of what the west has to do to triumph over evil.
AT its base, the long-standing intention has been – wherever pro Islamists reside, whether ensconced in America’s power centers, Eurabia, the Mid East, Asia, Africa and even in the caves of Afghanistan – to seize upon particular bloodletting, those which link a “cause and effect” from “insulting” Muslims!
ALAS, as Charlie Hebdo gives them the proverbial finger, by producing their “salute” to Muhammed after last week’s carnage – surely evincing much displeasure from the Islamist-in-Chief – similarly, why isn’t he concerned by the potshots the satirical weekly takes at Jews, Israel and everything (of a touchy nature) under the sun? And, what about the Arab/Muslim world’s CONTINUOUS incitement against the “zionist entity” and “Joos” – depicted as apes, pigs and monkeys – within EVERY forum they oversee, even in their schoolbooks?
STRANGELY, mum’s the word. Why??
(“courtesy” of Charlie Hebdo)
ON the other hand, as offensive as the above is to Jews and Zionists, and to all people of good conscience – this investigative journalist to boot – why is it that we understand that the overriding right to free speech supplants ones personal discomfit, whether religious-wise or not?
OTHERWISE, wouldn’t it be the case that we also have an excuse, a “religious” duty, to slaughter those who print said incitement, or at the very least demand a TOTAL restriction on said depictions, vile as they are to those who hold Judaism and Israel dear. Agreed?
FAIR is fair…except when one is viewing the world through the lens of “Islamophobia”!
IN fact, as one who has been surrounded by VERY high achievers – both personally and professionally – for years, well, the signs are easy peasy.
NOW, this does not mean that a major part of Islamic jihad’s triumph isn’t due to the leader of the (heretofore) free world (purposefully) throwing the game, so to speak. In other words, sports bookies know all about the value of “fixes”, while hapless gambling junkies can’t figure out why the most powerful player they just bet on flubbed everything in sight. Hmm….a sucker is born every minute.
SO, as we gingerly step into the Mid East’s cauldron of hell fire, one main fact is front and center: the upending of Libya catapulted ISIS’s strength – they hung in the background for about a decade – and Barack HUSSEIN Obama backed them via his “rebels”. This is a fact.
AND on the domestic front, even as the west finds itself in an unmitigated nightmare, this hasn’t stopped the Islamist-in-Chief from boosting Muslim immigration into U.S. borders at an unprecedented level – in less than 3 years – whether legal or illegal. What does that signal to you re his intent?
IN this regard, ISIS goes from strength to strength – as assorted jihadi players pledge their allegiance to the Islamic State Caliphate – making a mockery of the so-called display of western “unity” in Paris, with many of the leaders still behaving like pissants, terrified to even name the enemy: ISLAM !!
The Taliban cemented this unity pact by demonstratively beheading a Pakistani soldier they held prisoner.
This gesture came in rapid sequence after Amedy Coulibaly, the terrorist who on Jan. 9, broke into a kosher supermarket in Paris and murdered four Jews, avowed his adherence to ISIS.
Abu Bakr’s group this month therefore branched out from its Syrian-Iraqi “caliphate” not only into Europe but also into South Asia and across the Middle East.
In the week that Islamist terrorists carried out bloody atrocities in Paris, his jihad of terror was on the offensive and making strategic gains elsewhere:
1. The Islamic State was directly challenging the United States in new arenas – Europe, Pakistan and Afghanistan.
2. Monday, Jan 5, ISIS sent a force to cross into northern Saudi Arabia from Iraq. Three Saudi border guards including Gen. Odah al-Balawi, commander of the regional guard unit, were killed in the clash which took place in the Suwayf region of the Arar district. DEBKAfile’s counter-terror sources draw two disturbing conclusions from these bloody incidents:
Like the Paris attack, which saw Frenchmen attacking Frenchmen, the operation against the oil kingdom was carried out by Saudi nationals who had rallied to the Islamic State’s flag.
Abu Bakr has therefore captured an additional foothold in the heart of the Arabian Peninsula.
Secondly, as was also evident in Paris, ISIS, i.e. Al Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant, and AQAP, i.e. Al Qaeda in the Arabia Peninsula, are operating in harness. This was also evident from the claim by the Kouachi brothers who attacked Charlie Hebdo that they acted in the name of AQAP, in contrast to their associate, Coulibaly.
This cross-alliance, now joined by Taliban, represents an ominous escalation and expansion of the global jihad terror movement and the threat it poses to the United States, the West as a whole, the rest of the Middle East and Israel.
3. Abu Bakr al Baghdad, by his multi-branched terror spectaculars, has managed to seize the primacy of world Al Qaeda, pushing its formal leader Ayman al Zuwahri to the sidelines.
INDEED, the Dissembler-in-Chief would rather spit nails than to state the truth, as to why Paris – the west – is burning, instead, veering into the “Islamophobia” bugabooasthe culprit!
PARADOXICALLY, rather than to allow the west’s leaders to steer the Islamic narrative – even though Islamistsare permitted, mandated, to lie to advance Shariah law – the fact remains that Britain’s leading Islamist cut through the billowing smoke:
Shapiro led into the segment by quoting from Choudary’s USA Today Jan. 8 opinion piece titled “People Know the Consequences,” which blamed the French government for allowing publications to “provoke Muslims” and argued that Muslims do not in fact believe in the freedom of expression:
Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.
Shapiro then asked Choudary to discuss the Muslim view on the freedom of expression, specifically with regard to the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Choudary explained that Muslim scripture made clear that those who insult the Prophet, like journalists at Charlie Hebdo, must be punished: “Those who would insult the Prophet, kill them.” Sharia Law he said, clearly requires any who would insult those Muslims deem “prophets,” including Moses and Jesus, be tried in court and punished. This a system, he added, that Muslims are willing to “fight for and even die for.”
When Shapiro asked him if he believed that Western governments should ban the blasphemy of Mohammed, Choudary said he wanted Sharia Law in its entirety to be imposed on Western governments because it was a “better” system. However, if that were not possible, laws should be put in place against “provoking Muslims.” As he stressed in his article, Choudary said that killings like those Wednesday are “the consequence of insulting the Prophet.”
Pointing to the incompatibility of the Western and Sharia systems, Shapiro asked Choudary why the West should allow people like him to live in their boundaries. Choudary said he was born in England so he had the right to live there, and that “people always change” and “change is good,” so he believed that it was time for the West to change…..{blogger’s note: never mind that upend the existing national order, whether native born or not, is grounds for expulsion or jailing, whichever comes first}
ALAS, anyone who possesses a modicum of rational thinking and intellectual integrity doesn’t need to really ask: how in the hell did this geo-political nightmare happen, and in such a short time span, relatively speaking? The answers are clear, stark, and beyond ominous.
NOW that we understand the facts at hand, specifically, that the Islamist-in-Chief’s allied foot soldiers have penetrated from inside and outside U.S. borders, it begins to explain why ISIS (and their allied jihadists…whatever banner they hail under) have become brazen enough to announce: they will go after military personnel and their families on U.S. soil!Does anyone believe that regular citizens aren’t in their cross hairs, if targeting Army officers etc. doesn’t even scare them or give them pause?
AND, for the historical record, many have questioned how a preponderance of highly intelligent Jews, in pre-Holocaust Europe, were unable to see the signs, the forest from the trees. In retrospective, a fair question and assessment.
ON the other hand, by the time they allowed themselves to recognize what’s what, tragically, the gates were already locked, America’s slammed shut too. Mind you, these law-abiding, deeply patriotic, contributing citizens (some of whom were from this investigative journalist’s close family tree) did not enjoy the “right to bear arms”. Not only that, they were paltry in numbers, compared to the rest of the population.
THUS, history will surely judge this generation, particularly Americans, for failing to wrest control from those who are taking the nation into the abyss. For if tens of millions of (armed) patriots can’t get the job done, what could anyone have expected six million unarmed Jews to do??
IN light of all the above, how pressing is it to surround the White House until the Betrayer-in-Chief is led away in handcuffs?
{An anti-American, anti-western, anti-semitic triad: Nation of Islam’s Farrakhan, Shia’s Ahmadinejad & Black Panther’s Shabazz}
AT a time whereby Islam’s “soldiers for Allah” are exploding all over the world, it is not incidental that America’s long-standing domestic terrorists, the Black Panthers (“new” or old, makes no diff), are increasingly invigorated, openly challenging the nation’s underpinnings. More on their nexus – and the connection to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s “puzzling” (non) reaction to exploding jihad – in a bit. This is not a fairy tale!
NOW, even though their domestic terror supposedly “disbanded” decades ago, that’s the real fairy tale. Yes, they burrowed underground for sundry reasons, but they NEVER disappeared. However, their time “out of sight” must be viewed as an effort at reconstitution and alliance-building. Indeed, their foot soldiers remain in traditional militia garb, while their real leadership don suits and ties.
In September of 1998, Al Sharpton spoke at a particularly infamous NBPP rally in Harlem. It was called the “Million Youth March,” andthe group listed Sharpton as a co-organizer. This rally was after NBPP leader Khallid Muhammed had been dismissed as National Youth Minister by the Nation of Islam. Louis Farrakhan had deemed Muhammed to be too radical, but Sharpton did not.
The media strongly denounced the rally for its violent rhetoric. NBPP leader Khallid Muhammed was even accused of trying to start a race riot by encouraging attendees to attack the police. Several people fought with New York police officers as they left the rally.
Absent from media condemnations was any mention of Al Sharpton. The so-called “mainstream” media omitted any mention of Sharpton. Ironically, Sharpton claimed he would be attacked for speaking at the rally during his speech. This did not come true. Video of AlSharpton’s speech can be seen here. Click the video on this page to hear audio of Al Sharpton’s speech with a few added sound bytes from Malik Zulu Shabazz and Khallid Muhammed at the rally.
The speech given by Sharpton is not what most white liberal supporters are used to hearing. Sharpton praises Nation of Islam [NOI] founder Elijah Muhammed, Malcolm X, current NOI leader Louis Farrakhan, and NBPP leader Khallid Muhammad. He indicates that he is not going to let the white man decide which black leaders he can support.
Sharpton brought New York State Senator Efrain Gonzalez, who is a black Puerto Rican, with him to the rally. The rally was paid for by rap star Master P.
In 2001 Khallid Muhammed suffered a brain aneurysm. Al Sharpton was at Muhammed’s side when he died in the hospital. According to the NBPP, Sharpton gave Muhammed’s family $10,000 for his funeral.
Sharpton’s ties to the NBPP did not die with Muhammed. In 2003, the NBPP held a new rally in Harlem under the leadership of Malik Zulu Shabazz. Sharpton was initially scheduled to speak, but cancelled for an unknown reason. However, NBPP press releases stated that Sharpton was still endorsing the rally.
Al Sharpton is just one of dozens of black leaders and entertainers who get a free pass from the media for racial extremism. In 2010, the NBPP says pop star Andre 3000 spoke at their conference in Atlanta. Numerous other black entertainers and political leaders also spoke.
MIND you, despite – or because of – Sharpton’s connections to the Panthers, he is such a frequent guest at Obama’s White House he should have his own guest room for convenience. Heck, his name may as well be embossed on the bedroom’s door. Oh yeah…
IN this regard, it is intrinsic to note that the Panthers, like their fellow terror partners, the Weathermen, are ensconced within Obama Inc. Yup, they are.
AS a side note, one is not requested to write a particular book review (on the exact same subject matter), if one doesn’t know what’s what…so keep this tidbit in mind.
Implanted in 1969 in the heart of a revolutionary movement, Larry Grathwohl, a 22-year-old Vietnam vet, found himself acting as an FBI informant. Inserted into the Weather Underground organization under deep cover, he became privy to their terror plots as well as the leadership’s “reasoning”. It is this facet which still resonates today. BRINGING DOWN AMERICA is a gripping tale of plots and subplots, each one aimed at “the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie [and] the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat”, as Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and Jeff Jones exhorted in their 1974 manifesto, “Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism.” The subtext of this gripping memoir is brought to the fore in Chapter 14: “The Cover Is Blown:”….
For the record, El (Al) Fatah was the referenced Arab guerrilla group. Yes, the very same terror outfit spawned by the godfather of suicide terror, “Chairman” Yasir Arafat, a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. In tandem, the Weathermen conspired with the KGB and attendant communist regimes. The war being waged against the U.S. by the radical left and Islamist jihadis is premised on the U.S. as the Western spear and Israel as its twin “imperialistic” cousin. It has been playing out for decades, in one form or another. Nothing has changed other than the fact that many escaped justice and are entering their senior years. Despite their advancing age, they are as dangerous as ever — perhaps more so. Bill Ayers, the foremost leader of the Weathermen “is in his third decade as a national leader in the movement to radicalize the educational training of schoolteachers”. His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, a top leader too “is a professor of law at Northwestern and a high-ranking officer in the American Bar Association.” Eleanor Raskin (ne Stein) “is a law professor at S.U.N.Y Albany and, astonishingly, a NYS administrative law judge”. Jeff Jones “currently heads the New York-based Apollo Alliance, a highly influential coalition of labor leaders and environmentalists, and was responsible for drafting President Obama’s 2009 Recovery Act.”
The list of “respectable” cover, of other “notables” in the Weathermen, is equally impressive. Through a stringently planned operational “stealth jihad”, yesteryear’s Weathermen have returned, fully primed to carry out their original goal — the “transformation” of Amerika. Most significantly, they subvert the national interest from a distinctly dangerous vantage point. They are currently ensconced in some of the most powerful positions in academia and political life. The only difference is, this time they are dressed in “capitalist” garb, not only in their clothing choices, but in the wealth they have accumulated, paradoxically, through joining the “establishment”….
YET, to lend even more heft to the above charges, as to the deep association between the anti-American-in-Chief and domestic terrorists –
Will these New Black Panther members be heavily prosecuted? Hardly. In typical fashion, Attorney General Eric Holder has their back and is giving them a pass with only minor gun charges. More from the Free Beacon:….
Back during the 2008 presidential election, New Black Panther Party members were caught on video intimidating voters outside of a Philadelphia polling place with nightsticks. Charges were completely dropped by DOJ in late summer 2009.
Because of the developments in Ferguson, now is a good time to remind everyone that as Senator Obama, the current President of the United States marched with the New Black Panther Party in the streets of Selma, Alabama. FromBreitbart:
Barack Obama appeared and marched with members of the New Black Panther Party as he campaigned for president in Selma, Alabama in March 2007.
The photographs, captured from a Flickr photo-sharing account before it was scrubbed, are the latest evidence of the mainstream media’s failure to examine Obama’s extremist ties and radical roots…..(read the whole thing)
SO now that that is settled, and the ABIDING connection has been made between the Panthers, the Weathermen and Barack HUSSEIN Obama, what exactly is going on, relative to the resurgent and armed Black Panthers, openly patrolling America’s streets?and where does their linkage (heavily communist and socialist based) to Islamic jihad flow from, other than the ubiquitous red/green alliance?
AS to the answer re the aforementioned question, “where does their linkage (heavily communist and socialist based) to Islamic jihad flow from, other than the ubiquitous red/green alliance”? Well, its truth is so frightening that even this investigative journalist (hardly one who regularly requires smelling salts) took pause, though similar rumblings popped up in certain circles, well before they were laid bare, in plain sight, in 2012!
Envisions the “glory” of “paroling on the Israeli embassy with a hundred New Black Panthers” fighting for Palestine.
Fighting white people is an “international struggle against a common enemy.”
Whites are trying to “divide the non-white” population against each other
Because “half of Africa” was involved in slavery “we say Africa owes us reparations, too.”
Black radicals should seek “alliances that are possible right now with people who got solid track records of being against this beast [white people].”
Shabazz “stands on solid ideological ground” with “His Excellency, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.”
“Mahmoud Ahmadinejad”understands “the dynamics and the politics of world revolution.”
Shabazz discussed “bringing natural gas and oil and other reparations into the black nation, and other things – unmentionable” with Ahmadinejad.
There were “fifty Imams in the meeting” and “Minister Farrakhan is sitting in the first seat in the front.”
There are “just as many Arabs who hate this white man as we do” and the Black Panthers should ally themselves with radical Islam.
MOST significantly, this is precisely why Obama’s “foot soldiers” feel free to roam America’s streets armed; why violent Black mobs are terrorizing citizens, yet its leaders are welcomed at the White House; and why Barack HUSSEIN Obama was a “NO SHOW” in France, as world leaders (even though Abbas, a terrorist leader, was invited, as was Erdogan, Turkey’s Islamist Prez…but let’s not digress)gathered in France to show solidarity against Islamic jihad’s wanton rampages throughout Paris.
AS the west continues to reel from a war-like zone via back to back jihadi attacks in France, many are busy clucking, but hardly saying anything worth a damn; others are apologizing and groveling, almost ready to submit; while the rest are stuck in a state of suspended disbelief.
IN this regard, several analyses have already been penned, and they can be found here, here and here. They are yours to cogitate over, if you so desire.
EVEN those of us considered experts in any given field, surely have valuable mentors we still rely upon. As most readers realize by now, such is the case at this site. They are, for the most part, referred to here, but certainly there are others who must remain nameless.
MOST significantly, theorizing re this and that has its place, but that (elitist-driven) ship has sailed. In fact, the rivers of blood flowing in western (and Israeli) streets should serve as its testimony. It is way past time to apply PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS to the lessons learned.
IT is with the above duly in the forefront of your consciousness that the following is recommended as the highest ever alert given from this site – TOP PRIORITY! Not only is it nation-saving advice, but life saving on individual and family levels. Thus, read it, as is said, chapter and verse.
“Bitch Slap Muhammed into a Barrel of Pork” {blogger’s note: those who are offended by his “impolite” title, well, it’s your lives on the chopping block…}
Paris is falling and there is little that can be done about it. Islamic terrorists and their supporters have captured this great city. They will forever live in fear The same attacks will soon be in America. Our children, parents, friends, and neighbors will soon face firsthand Sharia law. Young American daughters will be stolen from the arms of their mothers. Jihadists will take your daughter and sell her for a few hundred dinar to the nearest bidder. If you are lucky the jihadists will give you a quick death. If you are pretty and strong you may be sold the purchaser of the buyer who bought your young daughter.
Sharia law in America will destroy America. Americans will be shamed to the utmost because they will have to do their Arab masters bidding – Judaism and Christianity will be abolished.
The attacks in Paris are only a beginning. America will suffer many more.
It is time for you to pick and chooses your friends. The Islamic ideology and Muslims are not your saviors and friends. You must count on neighbors, family, long-term friends and your religious organizations.
The future war between good and evil is upon us. Stockpile food, water, medicines, fuel if possible, ammo and guns. Martial law will be put into place and everything will be scarce. Buy silver and gold and establish a safe house for you and your family.
The most important thing you can do right now is to begin an extensive campaign mocking and slandering Mohammed and Islam every chance you get. Mark your cars and homes with these markings. Wear apparel with slander of Mohammed. If you own RV’s take travels through cities with anti Mohammed messages. We must send a strong message to the terrorists. Americans have said enough and will not take more. It may be time to fight for our country.
There are numerous Islamic events scheduled in the next month across America. Now is the time to disrupt their anti-America conferences. I would like to work with this in mid January. We need a dependable RV. We will mark it all over with slander against Islam and drive it from the east coast to the west.
11. He has made everything beautiful in its time; also the [wisdom of] the world He put into their hearts, save that man should not find the deed which God did, from beginning to end.
14. I knew that everything that God made, that will be forever; we cannot add to it, nor can we subtract from it; and God made it so that they fear Him.
18. I said to myself, [that this is] because of the children of men, so that God should clarify for them, so that they may see that they are [like] beasts to themselves.
19. For there is a happening for the children of men, and there is a happening for the beasts-and they have one happening-like the death of this one is the death of that one, and all have one spirit, and the superiority of man over beast is nought, for all is vanity.
21. Who knows that the spirit of the children of men is that which ascends on high and the spirit of the beast is that which descends below to the earth?
22. And I saw that there is nothing better than that man rejoice in his deeds, for that is his portion, for who will bring him to see what will be after him?
ITS reference, its reverence, is as timely today as it was during Biblical times. Read it, imbibe it, and then correlate its deep meaning with the ACTION PLAN given by one of this site’s most valued mentors, Dave Gaubatz.
ONE needn’t be a bonafide psychiatrist (just fully sentient and rational) to connect this and that counter intuitive reaction(s) to bloody assassinations. In other words, akin to victims thoroughly gripped by “Stockholm Syndrome”, many in the west still don’t get what is taking place before their eyes. Horrified.
Instead, they prefer to tell themselves one fairy tale after another, throwing liberty and freedom off the cliff (rewarding those who are wiping out all vestiges of western civilization from the map…even if it takes a hundred plus years), just to buy themselves some temporary respite. Does that sound like a well-conceived plan? Not from this perch.
MOREOVER, increasingly, some actually “explain” away murderous jihad, not out of ideological conviction (like the radical left, the twin side of Islamist totalitarianism), but due to mental captivity by those trying to kill them. The circular illogical “thinking” goes like this: if somehow westerners would behave more “properly” towards Islam, Muslim rampages would die down, perhaps cease altogether. Good luck with that.
BUT despite the fact that some are born cowards (males and females alike) and reflexively wish unpleasant facts away, the core lynch pin of Islam can’t be flicked from ones consciousness, as it underpins all the bloodletting.
SIMPLY put, Islam’s political pillars and religious ones are twinned, inseparable. This is precisely why a binding western concept/contract, the separation of church and state, is an anathema to a preponderance of Muslims.
ADDITIONALLY, when Islam’s followers refer to Shariah law as the “law of the land”, they are not speaking from a personal perspective, but from Islam’s! So, to be a “good” Muslim, one must implant Shariah, and submit everyone else to its dictates. Understood?
CONCOMITANTLY, westerners abide by the treasured ideal of freedom of religion and become ensnared in Islam’s dangerous spider web. Paradoxically, Muslims understand the dichotomy and abuse western freedoms to their complete advantage, playing non-Muslims for fools. Stealth by stealth jihad, they worm their way into western nations, until the time is ripe to pounce. And pounce they always do, just like this past week’s bloodbath in France!
EXTRAPOLATING further, this is precisely why true followers of Islam within the west (millions upon millions) can NEVER assimilate into western nations, regardless of all the concessions, welfare payments etc shoveled their way. If anything, it is this largess which assists them in removing themselves into Shariah law enclaves, the “NO GO” zones.
In the U.S., Dearborn, Michigan: Over 100,000 Muslims, 45% of the city has settled into their first ‘no-go’ zone. The city and police officials have been sued in many cases that allege discrimination “against Christians” effectively by the authorities applying Sharia law. Dearborn-Dar-al-Islam, (a place governed by Islamic Sharia law). The new idea of ‘no-go’ and ‘no-entry’ is significant, and shockingly being upheld. They provide weapons and guards and government officials in their own societies. They build what they want on their compounds. They have schools inside that their kids are educated in. They are taught their religion in school. No separation of Church (mosque) and State….{blogger’s note: others popping up all over America!}
RELATED to all of the above, to America’s security, some may recall a certain jihadi, Anjem Choudary, that this investigative journalist intersected with, at least via an intelligence analysis at World Net Daily. Bear in mind that this same British jihadi was arrested in Sept. 2014, swept up with a large net of major Islamists, only to be released the very next day!
Anjem Choudary, 47, was one of nine men held in a series of co-ordinated dawn raids by counter-terrorist police.
The show of force targeted the leadership of radical organisation Al-Muhajiroun, which he founded almost 20 years ago, and was later banned….
YES, alongside many others, he bears watching, in so far as his Euro contacts are deeply connected to American jihadists. They fervently want countless, simultaneous explosions, akin to Paris, throughout the U.S.
NOW, here is where it gets interesting, but one must first read the interview in its entirety, to realize that when an Islamist’s lips are moving they are (taqiyya) lying.
“Once they go to Syria, it’s really unlikely that any of them will return. Some have already become martyrs dying on the battlefield. However, many of them are having their passports revoked and are essentially left without a country to return to,” Choudary said.
He claimed it’s “fantasy” to think such fighters would come from the U.S. then return. {blogger’s note: the above is related to the mandated taqiyya, when speaking with non-Muslims….dismiss its importance at your peril}
But there are already reports of ISIS fighters returning home to Europe and to the U.S., said Clare Lopez, vice president for research and analysis at the U. S. Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C.
“Some intelligence community officials have expressed concern that ISIS could have a presence in the United States. We know that any number of jihadis, perhaps more than a 100 from the United States and thousands from Europe, have gone off the fight in jihad in Syria and Iraq,” Lopez said. “We know that some of them have returned.”
Authorities estimate 300 Belgians have traveled to the Middle East to fight with ISIS. Muslims from other European countries have also joined ISIS. A recent BBC News report said there are as many as 3,000 Europeans fighting with ISIS in Syria or Iraq.
Israel-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki said the concern over ISIS is well founded. However, Kutnicki told WND in an interview that the jihadists’ point of origin should not be the focus.
“Firstly, whether they are recruited in Belgium, or any other Western nation, is not the issue. The fact that Islamic jihad has come full circle – spreading its wings from the Mideast, back into Europe, only to re-enter the Mideast – is in order to fulfill the main mandate. That’s the reestablishment of the caliphate,” Kutnicki said…… (read the whole thing)
SO, coming full circle (and the reason why Choudary was interviewed in the first place…counter-jihadists and investigative journalists attempt to go to the head(s) of the snake to interpret this and that), first listen to Sean Hannity and Choudary tussling:
During the interview the Imam did not temper his words with caution, but doubled and tripled down, going so far as to claim that the United States, too, would come under Sharia law.
Among the more disturbing of his responses to Hannity’s questions were these:
“If the Americans bomb and murder hundreds of thousands of people, and they torture people, and they continue to do so in Guantanamo Bay, obviously this will have repercussions. I think it was your own master George Bush who said either you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists. And you know, we’re not with America definitely, so we must be with the terrorists.”
On the persecution of Christians in Iraq:
“The Christians are actually queuing up to come back into Mosul because they realize life under the sharia is much better than the Nouri Al-Maliki regime which the Americans propped up and who was murdering and torturing the people in the region.”
On the implementation of ISIS’ goals:
“I’m afraid you are living in a dream world. The Sharia will be implemented in America. It’s coming to a place very close to you.”
Should women who commit adultery be stoned to death?
“Both men and women, if there are witnesses, or they are self-confession, of course they will be punished. In Islam there is punishment.”
Should gay people be stoned to death?
“Under the Islamic state, people will not be doing this relationship in the public community. If they do, then there will be punishment. Of course.”
On support of Israel’s self-defense:
“When you live in America, you can believe that. The rest of the world think you’re crazy.”
And the quote of the day. Sean says “I don’t want your sharia law, and neither does anybody in Great Britain that has a brain.” The Imam responds definitively:
“You will have no choice about it Sean. It’s coming to a place near you. It’s coming to a place near you.”
TRENCHANTLY, the above dirt bag is at least honest in one basic respect, even if he lies like a drunken sailor about other matters. Heed his words carefully:
Although Muslims may not agree about the idea of freedom of expression, even non-Muslims who espouse it say it comes with responsibilities. In an increasingly unstable and insecure world, the potential consequences of insulting the Messenger Muhammad are known to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
Muslims consider the honor of the Prophet Muhammad to be dearer to them than that of their parents or even themselves. To defend it is considered to be an obligation upon them. The strict punishment if found guilty of this crime under sharia (Islamic law) is capital punishment implementable by an Islamic State. This is because the Messenger Muhammad said, “Whoever insults a Prophet kill him.”
However, because the honor of the Prophet is something which all Muslims want to defend, many will take the law into their own hands, as we often see.
Within liberal democracies, freedom of expression has curtailments, such as laws against incitement and hatred.
The truth is that Western governments are content to sacrifice liberties and freedoms when being complicit to torture and rendition — or when restricting the freedom of movement of Muslims, under the guise of protecting national security.
So why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?
It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world’s population was protected.
YET, make no mistake, followers of Islam twist around western liberties to suit their Shariah law compulsions. They see no distinction between a nation protecting its citizens from terrorists, and the jihadists themselves. They unequivocally, passionately believe that it is their duty to restrict western speech, come hell or high water. Therefore, any chance to take up arms for the “honor” of Islam, well, it won’t be missed. The lessons learned, its essence (most always), lies within its timing. Americans, you are forewarned.
BUT never one to lose sight of things that may assist us in our common western struggle, the following video is more than topical. On target.
MOST significantly, the MAJOR takeaway from everything you have just read is this: it has been completely proven that there are countless jihadi cells – Sunni and Shia – waiting for operational orders to strike within America. Alas, no one should be foolish enough to believe that an underground loudspeaker will be heard all over the nation, signaling to hidden cells, “get set and ready to blow”. Ridiculous.
BUT those of us who have experience and share info in this arena – ears to the ground too – also recognize that certain “background noises” are signals.
TO wit, with the clear “success” (never mind that except for one, as of this writing, who is still on the loose, those who held France hostage have become “martyrs”, as intended) of turning France (a nation which has a history of anti-semitism, clearly not a favorite on this end) into micro versions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria or some such bloody war zones, they have every confidence that not a damn western leader will stop their onslaught. In fact, multiple bombings, at every turn, have become more than doable!
SACH ha’kol, at the end of it all, Barack HUSSEIN Obama wants the same thing that Islamists want; Shariah law implanted within America! Given the fact that the Islamist-in-Chief has been wildly successful in upending America, who in their right (no pun intended) mind wants to bet against him/them?
TRAGICALLY, outrageously, it takes too many (in your face) acts of murderous jihad to gain the west’s attention. The question becomes: how long before the “news” of the latest Islamic assassinations – of the ENTIRE editorial/cartoon staff at Charlie Hebdo– wears off, and the usual PC response of “see no (Islamic) evil, hear no (Islamic) evil” reverts back to business as usual?
He reportedly told a French TV station that he was a member of the Islamic State group and was in cahoots with the Charlie Hebdo killers who were his “officers”…..
Gallery: Wanted: French Terror Suspects
French Terror Suspects
FOR heavens sake, Islam’s best American friend, the heretofore leader of the free world, responded to Paris’s murderous jihad par for his (biased) course. No one should dare believe that even the slaughter of kiddies will elicit any truth-telling from his direction.
“Never mind that most Westerners aren’t Islamophobic, but rather Getting Shot InThe Face For Expressing MyOpinion-Phobic,” Ben Shapiro wrote. Speaking with reporters, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said the real problem is lack of leadership in defending Islam. {blogger’s note: W T F ??}
“There are some individuals that are using a peaceful religion and grossly distorting it, { blogger’s note: and what exactly is considered non peaceful, perhaps the massacre of entire towns…probably not} and trying to use its tenets to inspire people around the globe to carry out acts of violence,” he said. “And we have enjoyed significant success in enlisting leaders in the Muslim community, like I said, both in the United States and around the world to condemn that kind of messaging, {blogger’s note: indeed, handpicked from Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia…ensconced throughout his admin and beyond} to condemn those efforts to radicalize individuals, and to be clear about what the tenets of Islam actually are. And we’re going to redouble those efforts in the days and weeks ahead.”
In other words, the White House now thinks part of its job is to defend Islam and teach Americans what it really believes. The stunning comment came in response to a question from a reporter who asked if the administration is concerned about a similar attack happening in the U.S. and if any plans are in place to raise threat levels in response to the attack.
“And obviously, we’re still trying to figure out exactly, like I said, who’s responsible for this attack in Paris, what their motivations are,” Earnest added. “But as a general matter, we’re very mindful of the threat from foreign fighters and the threat — and the need to try to counter some of the extremist ideology that ISIL is propagating, using some pretty sophisticated social media strategies….” read the rest at the risk of your head exploding!
BUTnever mind all the evidence, as to who, what, when, where and why this and that murderous jihad took place. Yes, even “WANTED: Dead Or Alive” posters – which marked the satirist behind Hebdo for assassination, others too – won’t convince those who are Allah-bent on imposing Shariah law on America, the west.
Contrary to earlier reports, which said that suspected killers Cherif Kouachi, 32, and Said Kouachi, 34, had been arrested, the two chief suspects remained on the loose and, police believe, well-armed and capable of inflicting further violence….
Inspire Magazine was first published in the United States by Samir Khan, a naturalized citizen then living with his parents in North Carolina. Khan soon relocated to Yemen and continued to publish Inspire under the supervision of another American Al-Qaeda member, Anwar Alwaki.
Both Khan and Alwaki have since been killed by United States drone attacks, but the magazine continues to publish.
After his arrest, accused Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev reportedy told police that Inspire gave him, and his brother Tamerlan who was killed in a shootout with police, the idea for their homemade bombs.
Along with the Charlie Hebdo editor, the Inspire Magazine hit list includes author Salman Rushdie, radical anti-Islam preacher Terry Jones, Morris Sadek who produced the anti-Islam online film Innocence of Muslims, and two Dutch cartoonists who had already survived assassination attempts after publishing satirical drawings of the Prophet Mohammed.
NOT to be lost in the discussion, the slickly produced Islamic terror magazine, Inspire – which non incidentally “inspired” the aforementioned American jihadists – is of piece with the Hebdo-styled threats coming America’s way, not excluding other explosive methods of Islamic jihad. Count on it. More about that in a bit….
MORE pointedly, in relation to U.S. satirists, many are familiar with The Onion, America’s premier satirical “newspaper”, one which has left many of us – at least with a sense of humor – in stitches. Not only that, but those who understand the precious value of free speech, also know that even if our sensibilities are offended, well, so be it. Suck it up. After all, if every other subject is ripe for mockery, why the hell should Muslims believe that their so-called “prophet” is off-limits, untouchable? Besides, who died and made them arbiters of the west’s discourse? Where do they get off silencing the rest of us?
According to totally and utterly depressing early reports, given the tragic deaths of 12 people, it is impossible to say with absolute certainty that this 500-word article will not make those involved in its writing—and potentially even those not involved—the targets of brutal and unconscionable violence.
“The heartbreaking tragedy that unfolded in Paris today is the result of a perverted, hateful ideology that has no place in the civilized world,” is a quote that someone or some group of people might be reading at this very moment and, in what unfortunately serves to illustrate the horrifying state of modern society, interpreting as an unforgivable insult against their beliefs that must be met with the cold-blooded murder of innocent people. “It’s just so terrible and senseless. I mean, how can something like this even happen?”
“I’m at a loss for words, to be perfectly honest,” is a further quote that would hopefully not enrage anyone to the point of actually taking another human being’s life, but which, for the love of God, conceivably could.
Those familiar with the situation told reporters that if someone were to read the very words written here and be offended by them, it would be reasonable to expect them to be upset and—at worst—write an angry letter to this publication expressing their ire in a relatively calm and composed fashion. Reports further confirmed that to somehow use this article—or indeed any article or any piece of self-expression—as a pretext to violence, let alone deadly violence, is simply impossible to justify and should never, ever transpire in human civilization.
Then again, sources added, that’s what actually happened today {blogger’s note: the words Islam and Muhammad are not even mentioned within…take it for what it’s worth}…..
ONION-like (relative to satirical “news” writing, the following is an appropriately timed interjection: a nearest and dearest served as Editor-in-Chief to The Frisch School flagship newspaper, “The Struggle”. The award winning high school newspaper always includes a “Purim Shpiel”, aka parody edition, a yearly Jewish holiday ritual riddled with articles from the most outrageous self-poking to the sublimely delicious…even the Headmaster/Principal can’t escape the net…), how timely is the following Jewish mockery, one which even the most ardent Zionist can laugh at?You see where this is going…if not, hint: the above satirists are still breathing!
YET, at the polar opposite side of the spectrum, murdering critics of Islam has been ongoing for decades. On the upside, some FINALLY internalize that mockery, in any form, towards Islam is a literal death sentence. Consequently, they may fully realize that censorship – the muting of criticism, whatever the topic may be – is simply intolerable within western liberal societies.
THE urgent questions become: what caused the west’s precipitous slide? and what’s next on tap to submit democracies to Islam?
MOST significantly, the bugaboo of “Islamophobia” (cited above) was conceived (and adopted by U.N. kleptocrats and western leaders) in order to silence ANY criticism of Islam. Its genesis can be found here, but its basis has spread like wildfire through CAIR, the U.S. propaganda arm of the Muslim Brotherhood.
YES, decades of PC silencing have led to the west’s slippery slope.
BUT few can argue – aside from the willfully blind and the ideologically malignant – that certain Islamic explosions have more “bang for the buck”, so to speak. In fact, the downing of passenger aircraft has always been their main goal, and they have been working non-stop for a repeat 9/11/01….a “spectacular” attack!
Like Iriyanto, el-Batouty had also been an Air Force pilot for his country. A 2012 article that was published in the Atlantic included the following excerpt:
Experts informed viewers of Egyptian television that it was impossible for el Batouty to have taken his own life because he was a good Muslim and suicide is haram (forbidden) in Islam.
For the record, all 19 hijackers on 9/11 considered themselves “good” Muslims who were committing suicide while killing infidels. As we have learned, the fundamentalist tactic known as Muruna even permits the killing of other Muslims in the process if it serves a greater “good”.
Here is a video which shows a timeline for Flight 990:
What the Evidence Shows
When it comes to modern day Islamic terrorism on western airlines, it can be argued that the modern era began in 1985 with the hijacking of TWA Flight 847. This airline wasn’t commandeered to commit suicide and mass murder; such a tactic hadn’t been implemented yet. Though terrorists took control of the plane, they simply forced the pilot to land in Beirut before making their demands.
While the hijackers did murder a U.S. service member named Robert Stethem before dumping his body off the plane, they didn’t yet have aspirations to be martyred in such operations. There were also survivors.
It can therefore be logically concluded that when it comes to modern day Kamikaze jihad, it’s ironic that individuals like Seiji Katagiri can be excluded. He should not be included in the post 1985 era. As for candidates that qualify as modern day Muslim Jihad Kamikazes…
Younes Khayati – 1994
Tsu Way Ming – 1997
Gamil el-Batouty – 1999
Khalid Al-Midhar – 2001
Majed Moqed – 2001
Nawaq Alhamzi – 2001
Salem Alhamzi – 2001
Hani Hanjour – 2001
Satam Al Suqami – 2001
Waleed M. Alshehri – 2001
Wail Alshehri – 2001
Mohamed Atta – 2001
Abdulaziz Alomari – 2001
Marwan Al-Shehhi – 2001
Fayez Ahmed – 2001
Ahmed Alghamdi – 2001
Hamza Alghamdi – 2001
Mohald Alshehri – 2001
Saeed Alghamdi – 2001
Ahmed Alhaznawi – 2001
Ahmed Alnami – 2001
Ziad Jarrahi – 2001
Zaccarias Moussaoui – 2001
*Richard Reed – 2001
*Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab – 2009
Zaharie Ahmad – 2014
Fariq Abdul Hamid – 2014
Captain Iriyanto – 2014
*Though Muslims who attempted to die in acts of suicide / mass murder, these two jihadists attempted to do so without seizing control of the cockpit.
Until more information can be gleaned – which SHOULD be readily available – about Santos Fernandes, it can be assumed that his name does not lend itself to Kamikaze Jihad. Since Fernandes falls within the window of modern day Kamikaze Jihad, his incident shall be considered an outlier. It’s worth noting that since 1994, the only incident of possible pilot suicide / mass murder that doesn’t appear to have a Muslim connection involves Fernandes. He is not on this list primarily because his name indicates he was not a Muslim. However, little is publicly known about him and an Islamic motive cannot officially be ruled out.
Unless western civilization comes to grips with the Muslim Kamikaze Jihad mentality, we can expect an increase in the number of Muslim commercial airline pilots. As that number increases, we can also expect an increase in the number of Muslim Kamikaze Jihad attacks.
MOST significantly, anti-semites world over should know this truth: what starts with the Jews, rest assured, NEVER ends with the Jews. Hence, as Euro trash are wont to do, callously shrugging their shoulders when Jews are gunned down here and there, they would do well to think twice. Thrice.
BACK to the pilots: without profiling who flies for U.S. carriers or into U.S. hubs, exploding planes will be coming to an American “theater” near you.
BOTTOM LINE: TSA isn’t worth a damn under the best of circumstances, so imagine how gaping a (security) hole exists, not even knowing if Islamic jihadists/sympathizers are flying for America’s airlines! Not only that, what about those who fly into U.S. airspace, and from hostile nations too?
IT is hardly a secret that U.S. intelligence agencies – of which the CIA and NSA play/manipulate at center stage – operate as separate entities. Yes, they are bureaucratic behemoths and turf struggles abound, often to the detriment of the mission at hand. Yet, at the same time, their work may very well overlap. It just depends.
SPECIFICALLY, as most realize, the CIA is tasked with conducting foreign intelligence operations. On the other hand, the NSA is in charge of making and breaking codes, and also intercepts communications abroad. Its acronym is SIGINT, a discipline which this investigative journalist couldn’t “make or break” in two lifetimes. We all have our strong suits, and there is no pretense that technological expertise is one such domain. Laughable.
THAT being said, a deep understanding of geo-politics and the Muslim Brotherhoodin toto (including, Islam’s political and cultural “norms” too) can be found within. Not only that, but world class resources can be accessed, even before many are able to finish their daily chores. That quick. Don’t doubt this.
BUT why is the above being mentioned? And what does it have to do with Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s terror-tied brother? Everything.
WITH all the dope leaking out (but only through alternative media sources) regarding Malik Obama’s Brotherhood terror sponsored nonprofit, why aren’t Repub power brokers clamoring to reveal this and that, even for a political edge, let alone patriotic ethos?
Number Two:
UNDERSTOOD, yes, the media is in his pocket, yet few ask a most pertinent question: other than their own biased, leftist outlook, what else is tying mainstream media bosses to the Betrayer-in-Chief’s tethers?
IN answer to question one, we must backtrack to the CIA and additional threads linking Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s CIA roots.
ADDITIONALLY, question two also dovetails with the media’s tie-in to the CIA. Indeed, this is also where the NSA, under his rule, was caught running wild. Thus, among other matters, lips are permanently zipped through massive domestic spying, blackmailing whomever they are tasked to silence by the POTUS! No kidding.
What you are about to read consists of previously reported data points but now also includes a key figure that eliminates much speculation when viewed in the context of these data points – the Executive Director in whose home was formed the Foundation headed by Barack Obama’s Muslim brother, Malik.
The trail leads back to Barack Obama’s time at Columbia University and the Executive Director of the Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF), Alton Ray Baysden, a registered Republican with a 35-year career with the U.S. State Department and Intelligence Community, as Shoebat.com has reported. Baysden’s field of operation included diplomatic security; he also worked in Karachi, Pakistan at a time when Barack was doing work for an employer that helped American businesses operate abroad. That employer also had a history of putting CIA operatives on their payroll, according to the New York Times.
Before going back that far, take a look at a series of events that transpired over a five-week period in the spring of 2008, as Barack Obama was campaigning for President:
Friday, March 21st: The Washington Post reports that three State Department contract employees breached the passport files of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain. Two of those employees are fired.
Sunday, April 6th: At a fundraiser in San Francisco, Barack admits to traveling to Pakistan while in college. Stealing the headline, however, was the infamous Obama quote about conservatives who “cling to guns or religion”, leaving open the possibility that the latter quote was intentionally delivered to allow that Pakistan trip to fly under the radar or at least to take a back seat in the shock value department.
Monday, April 7th: A man named A. Ray Baysden issues his only ever book review on Amazon. It is for a book entitled Immigration Chaos, written by immigration hawk Neville Cramer and Baysden gives it five stars. The contents of the book include revealing the corruption taking place at DHS. Again, why would such a person sign on with the Muslim brother of a pro-amnesty Presidential candidate in the same month?
Tuesday, April 8th: After reaching out to the Obama campaign for clarity on the surprise admission by Obama that he visited Pakistan in college, ABC News reports the campaign said Obama traveled to Karachi, Pakistan for three weeks in 1981, the year he began attending Columbia University.
Thursday, April 17th: Lt. Quarles Harris Jr., who is said to be a key witness in the case of the passport file breach at the State Department from weeks and months earlier is shot dead. Harris is found in his car outside a Washington, DC church and was said to have been cooperating with the investigation.
Wednesday, April 30th: The date on the BHOF 501(c)(3) approval letter showing the retroactive date the foundation became tax-exempt. Baysden is identified as the Executive Director. It is not known if this is the date of the meeting in Baysden’s home, only that it’s the date of exemption. The actual meeting may have taken place earlier in the month.
In 1984, Baysden was stationed in Karachi, Pakistan (his bio has a gap between 1980-88 so his time there could have spanned several years). Below are screenshots, presented by Shoebat.com last year, that include the cover of a State Department directory for Key Officers of Foreign Posts, dated January, 1984. Alton R. Baysden is listed on page 55 as being stationed in Karachi, Pakistan. Note that the cover states it’s a “Guide for Business Representatives”. The relevance of this will be made known shortly:
BARACK OBAMA’S STINT IN BUSINESS
Upon graduating from Columbia in 1983, Obama took a job with Business International Corp. (BI) in Manhattan and worked as junior editor until late 1984, the same year Baysden was stationed in Karachi. The stated purpose of BI was to assist American companies operating abroad.
According to a New York Times article published in 2007, while at BI, Obama also wrote for a weekly newsletter known as the Business International Money Report. Though it might be a stretch to identify the future president of the United States as a journalist in 1984, it could be argued that he technically qualified, which may take on added significance in light of BI’s connection to the CIA.
That leads to an extremely revealing 1977 New York Times article by John M. Crewdson entitled, “C.I.A. Established Many Links To Journalists in U.S. and Abroad”. Here is a screenshot of three paragraphs from the article. The crux of the article is that news organizations – both large and small – sometimes knowingly and sometimes unknowingly, hired CIA operatives who were actually doing double duty. One of those “news organizations” was the one Barack worked for after leaving Columbia:
Relevant excerpts transcribed:
…The Times found that at least 22 American news organizations had employed… American journalists who were also working for the C.I.A. In a few instances the organizations were aware of the C.I.A. connection, but most of them appear not to have been.
Crewdson reports that “…some of the most influential in the nation” were players, to include “ABC and CBS News… Time, Life and Newsweek magazines… The New York Times… The Associated Press… The Christian Science Monitor, The Wall Street Journal…”
Then comes the bombshell…
Among the lesser known organizations were the College Press Service, Business International,the McLendon Broadcasting Organization, Film Daily and a defunct underground newspaper published in Washington, The Quicksilver Times.
Seven years later, Barack Obama would find work with that organization in bold. Does this prove that Obama was doing intelligence work simply because he worked for BI?
Alone, no but it becomes a different story entirely with Baysden’s connection to Malik.
In the 2007 New York Times article, one of Obama’s co-workers at BI – Dan Armstrong – said that at the time he and Barack worked at BI, the company had a total of 250 employees world-wide. The odds of someone like Obama doing double duty with the CIA while at BI would seem to be higher than if he had been working at a major media organization with thousands of employees as opposed to one with less than 300; that doesn’t even factor in all of his CIA connections as POTUS.
Armstrong was asked about Obama’s account of his time at BI as it was described in Barack’s 1995 BookDreams From My Father. Armstrong charged that Obama’s description of his time at BI was an “exaggeration” in order to “make it a good story”. One of the lines from Dreams was as follows:
“Like a spy behind enemy lines, I arrived every day at my mid-Manhattan office.”
The irony is that contrary to Armstrong’s claim that Barack exaggerated his time at BI, there is a possibility that he may have understated it.
NEWS ORGANIZATIONS ONCE HOME TO CIA OPERATIVES AID AND ABET OBAMA
Obama would become President of the United States 25 years later and “the media”showed no interest in vetting him.Just how many secrets does he hold and how much dirt does he have on how many very powerful people? The insanely favorable treatment he has received from media outlets and even his opponents has been breathtaking to behold. The simple explanation is that such individuals and entities are afraid of the race card. If that’s a factor, it’s a small one but makes a workable excuse.
To be fair, Crewdson reported that the CIA program he was writing about in 1977 had ended years earlier. Does anyone really believe such an operation was just ended, never to return? Having you believe that is part of the CIA instruction manual. Besides, there is overwhelming consensus that never in the history of the United States has there been a more complicit and fawning media when it comes to the Barack Obama candidacy and presidency; vetting did not take place relative to the candidate who deserved it most.
There has got to be a reason that transcends race and Republicans being afraid to challenge him because of it.
It’s time to put an end to this case being about circumstantial evidence exclusively but it requires members of Congress, the media (conservative media included) and attorneys for Tea Party groups to take the baton and do so. To this point, they have all failed the American people. The fact remains that no matter how much of the aforementioned evidence is coincidental or circumstantial, the introduction of Baysden into this whole mess all but closes the loop.
In 1984, the U.S. was aiding the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mujahideen in its fight with the Soviet Union from Karachi, Pakistan. As such, the man named Baysden listed in that manualhad to be part of this effort. Barack Obama made at least one three-week trip to Pakistan with his Pakistani ‘friends’ during this period. If he had the charisma to one day be elected POTUS, he certainly had enough to qualify for an intelligence asset gig in the 1980’s. A man who would one day become a very close adviser to Barack Obama – Zbigniew Brzezinski – visited Pakistan in 1979 when he was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser and gave the Taliban a pep talk, as Shoebat.com reported:
In addition to working for an organization with a history that included hiring CIA operatives performing double duty, Barack Obama’s entire family in Kogelo is Sunni Muslim (except for him, of course), making him a perfect fit as an operative from the city where Baysden was working – Karachi. In fact, Barack is said to have recited the Islamic call to prayer with at “first-rate accent” by none other than a fawning New York Times writer in Nicholas Kristof. During the 2008 Presidential campaign, George Stephanopolous was very quick to come to Obama’s rescue when the presidential candidate inadvertently referred to his “Muslim faith” before Steph threw him a lifeline:
Everyone came to Barack’s rescue during his 2008 campaign, including his Republican opponent John McCain, who inexplicably refused to go after Obama’s weakest spots, to include Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers. Then of course, there was this infamous and disgraceful town hall appearance about one month before the election in which McCain was booed by his own supporters for defending Obama. In so doing, McCain defied the cardinal rule when on the campaign trail go after your candidate; he did the opposite. In so doing, the people who were readiest to put their differences with McCain aside and rally to his candidacy actually booed him; it was unprecedented:
In 2013, McCain’s 2008 running mate Sarah Palin revealed that she was forbidden to discuss Obama’s connections to Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers during the campaign:
Shockingly, 2012 was not really any different. Republican nominee Mitt Romney showed no interest in fighting back against libelous and slanderous charges levied against him by the Obama campaign. At one point, he was accused of murder. The brazen unwillingness on the part of Romney to show any self-respect led to voters showing him the ultimate in disrespect; millions chose not to vote.
The media assumed its role as Obama’s propaganda arm as well. In the second presidential debate, CNN’s Candy Crowley infamously came to Obama’s rescue when the subject turned to the Benghazi attacks. On top of that, Romney was ill-equipped to respond despite Benghazi being his biggest opportunity to make Obama a one-term president:
In the third debate, as more had been learned about what happened in Benghazi, viewers anticipated Romney drilling Obama on the subject. Since debate number two, he had plenty of time to read up on the details of the scandal. The video of the debate below is cued up to start with moderator Bob Schieffer asking the very first question, which involved Benghazi. Instead of hitting Obama where he was weakest, Romney took a dive and the subject never came up again:
WHY THE BARACK H. OBAMA FOUNDATION IS SO EXPLOSIVE
If members of Congress were really interested in getting to the truth about the IRS scandal, Lois Lerner’s involvement in granting Malik’s Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) expeditious and illegally retroactive tax-exempt status would have been introduced; she would have been asked about that in one of the two House Oversight Committee hearings she appeared before. Had she been publicly asked about Malik’s ties to a State Sponsor of Terrorism in Sudan, Lerner could have been exposed as an accessory to terrorism in addition to helping the President’s brother commit fraud; she would have transformed into a canary before America’s eyes.
To this day, Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) refuses to acknowledge this gargantuan issue after declaring the claims as being “spot-on” during a radio town hall in 2013, as Shoebat.com reported. Perhaps worse, when IRS Commissioner John Koskinen appeared before Kelly at a House Ways and Means Committee hearing a year later, Kelly physically embraced the Commissioner and didn’t raise the issue once in the five minutes he was given, as Shoebat.com reported.
Kelly is the only known member of Congress to not only acknowledge the scandal – as well as its legitimacy – publicly and proceed do nothing. He is certainly not the only member of Congress who knows about it;that’s a fact.
Perhaps even more vexing has been the refusal of True The Vote’s attorney Cleta Mitchell to introduce the scandal in one of the several congressional hearings she has attended. Contrasting the egregious treatment her client Catherine Engelbrecht received from the IRS with the illegally favorable treatment received by BHOF is a contrast made to order. Engelbrecht, a conservative member of the Tea Party is a law-abiding citizen who was run through the wringer by the IRS when she tried to get tax-exempt status. The president’s brother, who has been connected to the financing of terrorism and a State Sponsor of Terrorism, saw his 501(c)(3) status expedited by Lerner.
Yet, Mitchell ignored it all despite knowing the details, even after her client was a victim of further injusticewhen a judge ruled she couldn’t have a forensics expert help find Lerner’s emails. Why?
FOUNDING OF BHOF
The BHOF was founded in the home of a man named Ray Baysden in April of 2008 but never filed for its tax-exempt status, as Shoebat.com reported. When the heat was put on BHOF in May of 2011, courtesy of a formal complaint by the watchdog group National Legal and Policy Center that was reported by the New York Post, the powers that be kicked into gear. Making the BHOF legal became a top priority from the top down.
Paperwork that should have been filed three years earlier but wasn’t, was finally filed. BHOF had been accepting tax-deductible donations without being tax-exempt, a crime if done so more than 27 months without that status.
BHOF received its 501(c)(3) approval letter, replete with Lerner’s signature and a date stamp of June 26, 2011 – a SUNDAY!Lerner had backdated the approval by a whopping 38 months and in record time!
As if the crime of fraud is not bad enough, Lerner should have been put on the hood for being an accessory to terror funding as Malik has deep ties to terrorists, terror groups and even on State Sponsor of Terrorism, as Shoebat.com has reported. The most explosive scandal in the history of the United States is being universally ignored and the reason why is clear.
A whole lot of people have had their dirty hands tied behind their backs. They’ve also been gagged by a President who knows all their secrets and knows how to make them dance. In return, he’s been protected and just continues living like a king.
Can you think of a better reason why all this is getting ignored?
ALL of the above more than accounts for the “radio silence” on the most corrupt, anti-American regime in U.S. history. In fact, it demonstrates the extent that the Sword of Damocles hangs over many heads, akin to dictatorships around the world. Indisputably, even the brother of the leader of the free world is untouchable, a Teflon Terror Don. Simply put, Obama Inc. has enough blackmail on every player with juice, stopping them in their tracks. Dead, if it comes to it...dropping like flies!
CONCOMITANTLY, the above (partly) explains why so many (from the media, and both sides of the political aisle) have been cowed into submission, re his non-existent paper trail. His bonafides.
NEUROTMESIS: Cutting the Nerves & Isolating the Head
نيوروتمسيس: قطع الأعصاب وفصل الرأس
{The above is their latest “inspiration”, “gifted” from the bowels of Islam’s barbarous machine….Americans are their top targets, but Euros will suffice…regardless of how many concessions are offered for the price of submission}
WE all know that Europe is gone. Dead and buried. It is just a question of when, and where, its burial forceps will be officially wielded. And those who still believe that Europe has not become Eurabia, well, that’s okay. After all, everyone is entitled to their fantastical thinking. However, on this end, no such nonsense is tolerated.
NOT only that, but along this same journey of honest assessment, one cannot behave contrary to ones national well being, then claim to be shocked…shocked…when the crap starts to bury everyone alongside you. Agreed?
Islamic extremists are stepping up the creation of “no-go” areas in European cities that are off-limits to non-Muslims.
Many of the “no-go” zones function as microstates governed by Islamic Sharia law. Host-country authorities effectively have lost control in these areas and in many instances are unable to provide even basic public aid such as police, fire fighting and ambulance services.
The “no-go” areas are the by-product of decades of multicultural policies that have encouraged Muslim immigrants to create parallel societies and remain segregated rather than become integrated into their European host nations.
The Islamic Emirates Project names the British cities of Birmingham, Bradford, Derby, Dewsbury, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Luton, Manchester, Sheffield, as well as Waltham Forest in northeast London and Tower Hamlets in East London as territories to be targeted for blanket Sharia rule.
In the Bury Park area of Luton, Muslims have been accused of “ethnic cleansing” by harassing non-Muslims to the point that many of them move out of Muslim neighborhoods. In the West Midlands, two Christian preachers have been accused of “hate crimes” for handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of Birmingham. In Leytonstone in east London, the Muslim extremist Abu Izzadeen heckled the former Home Secretary John Reid by saying: “How dare you come to a Muslim area.”
In France, large swaths of Muslim neighborhoods are now considered “no-go” zones by French police. At last count, there are 751 Sensitive Urban Zones(Zones Urbaines Sensibles, ZUS), as they are euphemistically called. A complete list of the ZUS can be found on a French government website, complete with satellite maps and precise street demarcations. An estimated 5 million Muslims live in the ZUS, parts of France over which the French state has lost control.
Muslim immigrants are taking control of other parts of France too. In Paris and other French cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse, thousands of Muslims are closing off streets and sidewalks (and by extension, are closing down local businesses and trapping non-Muslim residents in their homes and offices) to accommodate overflowing crowds for Friday prayers. Some mosques have alsobegun broadcasting sermons and chants of “Allahu Akbar” via loudspeakers into the streets.
The weekly spectacles, which have been documented by dozens of videos posted on Youtube.com (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here), and which have been denounced as an “occupation without tanks or soldiers,” have provoked anger and disbelief. But despite many public complaints, local authorities have declined to intervene because they are afraid of sparking riots.
In the Belgian capital of Brussels (which is 20% Muslim), several immigrant neighborhoods have become “no-go” zones for police officers, who frequently are pelted with rocks by Muslim youth. In the Kuregem district of Brussels, which often resembles an urban war zone, police are forced to patrol the area with two police cars: one car to carry out the patrols and another car to prevent the first car from being attacked. In the Molenbeek district of Brussels, police have been ordered not to drink coffee or eat a sandwich in public during the Islamic month of Ramadan.
The interviewer asked Witthaut: “Are there urban areas – for example in the Ruhr – districts and housing blocks that are “no-go areas,” meaning that they can no longer be secured by the police?” Witthaut replied: “Every police commissioner and interior minister will deny it. But of course we know where we can go with the police car and where, even initially, only with the personnel carrier. The reason is that our colleagues can no longer feel safe there in twos, and have to fear becoming the victim of a crime themselves. We know that these areas exist. Even worse: in these areas crimes no longer result in charges. They are left ‘to themselves.’ Only in the worst cases do we in the police learn anything about it. The power of the state is completely out of the picture.”
In Italy, Muslims have been commandeering the Piazza Venezia in Rome for public prayers. In Bologna, Muslims repeatedly have threatened to bomb the San Petronio cathedral because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inspired by Dante’s Inferno which depicts Mohammed being tormented in hell.
In the Netherlands, a Dutch court ordered the government to release to the public a politically incorrect list of 40 “no-go” zones in Holland. The top five Muslim problem neighborhoods are in Amsterdam, Rotterdam and Utrecht. The Kolenkit area in Amsterdam is the number one Muslim “problem district” in the country. The next three districts are in Rotterdam – Pendrecht, het Oude Noorden and Bloemhof. The Ondiep district in Utrecht is in the fifth position, followed by Rivierenwijk (Deventer), Spangen (Rotterdam), Oude Westen (Rotterdam), Heechterp/ Schieringen (Leeuwarden) and Noord-Oost (Maastricht).
In Sweden, which has some of the most liberal immigration laws in Europe, large swaths of the southern city of Malmö – which is more than 25% Muslim – are “no-go” zones for non-Muslims. Fire and emergency workers, for example, refuse to enter Malmö’s mostly Muslim Rosengaard district without police escorts. The male unemployment rate in Rosengaard is estimated to be above 80%. When fire fighters attempted to put out a fire at Malmö’s main mosque, they were attacked by stone throwers.
In the Swedish city of Gothenburg, Muslim youth have been hurling petrol bombs at police cars. In the city’s Angered district, where more than 15 police cars have been destroyed, teenagers have also been pointing green lasers at the eyes of police officers, some of whom have been temporarily blinded.
In Gothenburg’s Backa district, youth have been throwing stones at patrolling officers. Gothenburg police have also been struggling to deal with the problem of Muslim teenagers burning cars and attacking emergency services in several areas of the city.
IN fact, Jews are fleeing France – many parts of Europe – in droves, the dark days of the Holocaust resurrected. As Martin Niemöller said:
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
IF Americans think they are going to escape the sword of Islam, think again. They only have to enter certain communities, and would be hard pressed to wonder: where are they, in the U.S. or an Islamic controlled colony?An Islamic infiltration and penetration…step by step…
THAT being said, the following is the latest barbarism from the “religion of peace”, in Paris, a city they practically own already. In other words, they won’t be satisfied until FULL submission takes place, even if it means shooting every non-Muslim on sight! BTW, the scuttlebutt – from Israeli intelligence – is that today’s jihad was an opening shot in France…elsewhere too!
Police launched a massive manhunt for the masked attackers who reportedly hijacked a car and sped off, running over a pedestrian and shooting at officers.
Police said witnesses heard the attackers, who were armed with a Kalashnikov and rocket launcher, shout “we have avenged the prophet” and “Allahu akbar” (God is greatest).
Two police were confirmed among the dead and four people were critically injured.
The capital was placed under the highest alert status after the attack on Charlie Hebdo, a satirical weekly that has sparked anger in the past among Muslims for publishing cartoons of the prophet Mohamed.{blogger’s note: do we detect an apologetic tone in this piece… blaming the victims…that “provoking” Muslim anger, their “sensibilities”, is an “excuse” for their barbarism…that “infidels” should know better??}
Television footage showed large numbers of police in the area, bullet-riddled windows and people being carried away on stretchers.
The attack took place at a time of heightened fears in France and other European capitals over fallout from the wars in Iraq and Syria where hundreds of European citizens have gone to fight alongside the radical Islamic State group.
President Francois Hollande, who immediately rushed to the scene of the shooting, described it as a barbaric terrorist attack.
“An act of exceptional barbarism has just been committed here in Paris against a newspaper, meaning (against) the expression of liberty,” Hollande said at the scene.
One man who witnessed the shooting said he saw two attackers shooting their way out of Charlie Hebdo at around 11:30 am.
“I saw them leaving and shooting. They were wearing masks. These guys were serious,” said the man who declined to give his name.
“At first I thought it was special forces chasing drug traffickers or something. We weren’t expecting this. You would think we were in a movie.”
Hollande called for “national unity”, adding that “several terrorist attacks had been foiled in recent weeks”.
The White House condemned the attack in the “strongest possible terms,” while British Prime Minister David Cameron called it “sickening.”
“We stand with the French people in the fight against terror and defending the freedom of the press,” Cameron said in a message on Twitter.
Wednesday’s shooting is one of the worst attacks in France in decades.
The satirical newspaper gained notoriety in February 2006 when it reprinted cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that had originally appeared in Danish daily Jyllands-Posten, causing fury across the Muslim world. {bloggers note: when aren’t they furious??}
Its offices were fire-bombed in November 2011 when it published a cartoon of Mohammed and under the title “Charia Hebdo”.
Despite being taken to court under anti-racism laws, {blogger’s note: big mistake…freedom of expression, when turned into “racism”, only whets their appetites for further submission} the weekly continued to publish controversial cartoons of the Muslim prophet.
In September 2012 Charlie Hebdo published cartoons of a naked Mohammed as violent protests were taking place in several countries over a low-budget film, titled “Innocence of Muslims”, which was made in the United States and insulted the prophet. {bloggers note: “Innocence of Muslims” has already been proven to be a ready made excuse, for both Islamic barbarians and Obama Inc., as surrogates helped stoke it to cover up his illegal war in Libya}
French schools, consulates and cultural centres in 20 Muslim countries were briefly closed along with embassies for fear of retaliatory attacks at the time.
Editor Stephane Charbonnier has received death threats and lives under police protection.{bloggers note: is this normal, an Editor should live in fear??}
This week’s front page featured controversial French author Michel Houellebecq, whose latest book “Soumission”, or “Submission,” which imagines a France in the near future that is ruled by an Islamic government, came out Wednesday.
The book has widely been touted as tapping into growing unease among non-Muslim French about immigration and the rise of Islamic influence in society.
AND while Allah’s terror soldiers are busy imposing Shariah law all over the west, no place – none at all – is safe from their grasp. It will only get worse, if westerners just back off and leave them a wide berth.
IN this regard, even online alternative media sites are targeted with intimidation tactics, and this site is no exception, as revealed here.
“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.'”
The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear….
AND so on and so forth. The point being, regardless what they threaten and what they actually do, the answer does NOT lie with silence. To the contrary. The more they threaten, the louder the west’s megaphone has to become. You hear that?
BESIDES, what is the alternative? Is it between a slow national and cultural suicide, or a fight to hold onto what is near and dear?
{This little toddler is “kosher” to marry, so deemed by the highest authorities in Saudi Arabia, Sunni Islam’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh…others will follow suit!}
THE normative legal definition of the crime of pedophilia is very clear and without ambiguity. It specifies sexual engagement – direct contact with males or females – who are under the legal age of consent. Child molestation is its cornerstone.
IT matters not a whit that the medical community has labeled it a “disease”, as has been done with addiction, specifically alcoholism. In others words, when material harm is caused to another, it is neither here nor there – to the victim – what labels are used to “explain” away ones actions.
NOW, no one who is honestly familiar with the “Black Heart(s)” of Islam can deny: its underpinnings support the most heinous crimes imaginable. That’s a fact.
When I was in Iraq I had the opportunity to interview several captured Al Qaeda members. I asked them what type of future attacks America would endure. The answer over and over was that the hearts of Americans would be attacked. They explained that this meant the American children would be attacked because they are the hearts of the American people. These terrorists said the attacks would not necessarily be physical attacks, but rather a slow indoctrination in U.S. public schools and universities. The indoctrinating would include the Islamic ideology is peaceful and even as non-Muslims they support Islam and the Muslim people.
I have had several Islamic leaders tell me that Muslims who practice ‘Pure Islam’ have what is called ‘Black Hearts’. These Muslims had no conscience, feelings, emotions, love or caring about anything or anyone aside from Allah. Essentially they have no souls. They have an empty heart. These people have no feelings for even their own children; needless to say they have no feelings for children who are not theirs. It is just as easy for them to behead a neighbor child as it would be to behead even their own children. Children are simply a tool for them to use to achieve their ultimate goal of an Islamic Ummah (nation) under Shariah law.
Based on my experiences and studies, the Islamic ideology itself is a dangerous and violent weapon. The true enemies of the non-Muslim world are the ideology of Islam. We can fight and defeat Hamas, Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the dozens of other Islamic acronyms, but we will lose in the end if at some point we do target the ideology they teach within most mosques. When someone discusses the Hitler ideology of hate and violence, almost automatically people get a sour feeling in their stomachs. Most people realize the ideology of Hitler was a danger to the whole world. Sadly in order to defeat Islamic based terrorists we must have the same sour feeling in our stomach when Islam itself is discussed. Islam is not loving and peaceful and Mohammed never intended for it to be.
AND if more substantive proof is required re the way Islam treats women and children, well, slavery and Islam’s “dancing boys” should suffice – or not.
BUT to understand the latest Islamic fatwa…فتاوى…is to internalize what it means, both from an Islamic jurisprudence rendering and a cultural one.
INTRINSICALLY, while sex with children has always been an Islamic “norm”, the fact that it is now a MAJOR legal rendering, well….
F. Michael Maloof reports for WND, Jan. 3, 2015, that none other than Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh, the country’s top religious authority in the ultra-conservative Wahhabi school of Sunni Islam, has ruled it’s acceptable for men to marry girls so young the West would deem it nothing short of pedophilia and rape.
As Grand Mufti, Abdulaziz is president of the Supreme Council of Ulema (Islamic scholars) and chairman of the Standing Committee for Scientific Research and Issuing Fatwas, which means he speaks authoritatively in Islamic teachings.
The Saudi justice ministry had tried but failed to set 15 as a minimum age to marry a girl in the kingdom. But Grand Mufti Abdulaziz does it even “better,” declaring there is nothing prohibiting Muslim men from marrying girls even younger.
Grand Mufti Abdulzaiz’s more recent ruling on marrying young girls comes following a similar ruling in 2011 by Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a prominent cleric and member of the Saudi’s highest religious council, who issued a fatwa, or religious edict, that there is no minimum age to marry girls, “even if they are in the cradle.”
There is nothing in Islamic, or Shariah law, that sets a minimum age limit on marrying girls.
Scholars say the age of marrying young girls and consummating the “marriage” is based on the example set by Muhammad when he married Aisha when she was no more than seven years of age, consummating the marriage when she was nine.
“The grand point of the Saudi fatwa, however, is not that girls as young as nine can be married, based on Muhammad’s example, but rather that there is no age limit whatsoever,” Middle East expert Raymond Ibrahim writes in Middle East Forum. “The only question open to consideration is whether the girl is physically capable of handling her ‘husband.’ The lives of countless young girls are devastated because of this teaching.”
Grand Mufti Abdulaziz and Fawzan’s fatwas come even as Saudi men have been reportedly purchasing young girls from Syrian refugee camps in Lebanon and Jordan.
As WND recently reported, rich Saudi Arabian men – some associated with the Saudi royal family – have been purchasing for their sexual pleasure Syrian girls and young women from among the hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing the Syrian civil war conflict to Lebanon and Jordan.
Most of these Saudi men are said to be in their 60s and 70s. When they tire of the girls, they often hand them off to other men.
“They come into Lebanon and Jordan and go to the Syrian refugee camps where the Syrian families there have nothing,” one Lebanese source told WND. “The Saudis then offer $200 for girls aged 9 to 14 years and take them from their families. Because the families are so desperate for money, they give in to the temptation.”
The United States, allied with Saudi Arabia, has been silent on its treatment of young girls.
GRANTED, pedophilia is rampant throughout the west. And the putrid fact is that its vile grasp reaches into the lowest strata of society to the highest. It is an equal opportunity scourge.
GO ask those who hob nob with kingpin Jeffrey Epstein – accused pedophile du jour of the jet set – namely, Billy boy Clinton aka Bubba, global warming huskster Al Gore, Prince Andrew and all the rest of the movers and shakers who either partook, or knew but looked aside. Israel’s ex PM Ehud Barak (when he was Defense Minister) flew on Epstein’s private jet and likely witnessed this and that deviance and criminal behavior, but that didn’t stop him (or other high level politicians et al.) from palling around with a pedophile! Oh my…
IF the argument becomes, well, the above is a distinction without a difference, then there is little left to say, other than that Islam is compatible with “acceptable” western norms (other than those held by deviants who are rich, poor or in between) and we should all just get over it. Go back to sleep.
WHENEVER atrocities occur within Syria, Iraq, Libya and related arenas, rest assured, Obama Inc.’s “rebels” are not far behind. In fact, they are deeply in the mix. ISIS linked and pledged. Evidence galore.
Critics ridiculed Obama’s anti-constitutional “strategy” as absurd, but it appears that he will not be deterred. Other analysts noted that, after failing in his Libya war-style bid to overthrow the anti-ISIS Assad regime by backing jihadists, Obama appears to be plotting “regime change” in Syria through the back door. Not only will he be providing more support to the jihadist rebels, under the guise of striking ISIS, Obama also vowed to unleash military strikes within Syrian territory — something Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem said last month would be considered an act of aggression if done without permission. Jihadist rebel groups in Syria immediately celebrated Obama’s plot.
Last night, Obama announced that he would double down. “Across the border, in Syria, we have ramped up our military assistance to the Syrian opposition,” Obama boasted, seemingly oblivious to the irony and absurdity of it all. “Tonight, I call on Congress again to give us additional authorities and resources to train and equip these fighters. In the fight against ISIL, we cannot rely on an Assad regime [a former U.S. ally] that terrorizes its own people — a regime that will never regain the legitimacy it has lost. Instead, we must strengthen the opposition as the best counterweight to extremists like ISIL, while pursuing the political solution necessary to solve Syria’s crisis once and for all.” He also noted that his “allies” were also already “sending arms and assistance” to “the Syrian opposition.”
One major problem with that “strategy,” of course, is that even the supposed “moderate” Syrian opposition — all of whom proudly describe themselves as Islamists and jihadists fighting for Allah against an “apostate” regime — have openly boasted of their collaboration with both al-Qaeda and ISIS. “We are collaborating with the Islamic State and the [al-Qaeda-linked] Nusra Front by attacking the Syrian Army’s gatherings in … Qalamoun,” commander Bassel Idriss with the Obama-backed “Free Syrian Army” recently told Lebanon’s Daily Star newspaper.
Indeed, entire FSA brigades armed and trained by Obama and his “allies” have proudly defected to ISIS, taking all of their Western government-provided weaponry with them.Even Islamic State operatives boast of their intimate ties with Obama’s “moderate” rebels in major media outlets. “We are buying weapons from the FSA,” ISIS terrorist Abu Atheer was quoted as saying by Al-Jazeera. “We bought 200 anti-aircraft missiles and Koncourse anti-tank weapons. We have good relations with our brothers in the FSA. For us, the infidels are those who cooperate with the West to fight Islam……”
THE linkage can no longer be in doubt, and this site’s (prescient) recaps attest as much:
IN this regard, how is it NOT possible to blame Barack HUSSEIN Obama for the uptick in persecution, the decimation, of Christians and minorities in the Mid East (and Africa), in so far as “his rebels” are at the epicenter. Less than six degrees of separation.
When insurgents stormed Kessab, they posted pictures of themselves protecting ancient churches. But a visit to the Syrian town tells a different story.
Rain seeped into the tombs through shattered flagstones. Nearby, marble crosses lay in pieces. Plastic flowers, once lovingly placed on a grave, were torn and stamped into the earth.
Beside the desecrated graveyard in the Syrian town of Kessab stood the Holy Trinity Armenian Evangelical church. Its library, pews and altar had all been burned by arsonists.
The perpetrators had shown both purpose and glee in their destruction of Christian sites in this ancient Armenian town. Statues were riddled with bullets and Islamist slogans were scrawled across the walls of homes and shops.
Once a haven from Syria’s civil war, nestled in the hills of Latakia province, Kessab gained international fame when it was captured by rebels last spring in a surprise offensive that forced the town’s 2,500 Armenian Christians to flee.
Turkey was widely accused of helping the insurgents to capture Kessab, despite the participation in the attack of Jabhat al-Nusra, an affiliate of al-Qaeda.
But the Syrian armed forces took back the town in June after it had endured three months of rebel occupation. The Telegraph traveled to the area on a facility trip with the Syrian regime to witness the aftermath of the battle.
The desecration of Kessab’s churches contradicts the claims of Syrian rebels that their fighters are non-sectarian protectors of Christian residents and heritage.
The evidence also fails to support counter-claims by pro-government groups that Armenian Christians were “massacred” during the rebel offensive.
When this assault began last year, Turkey’s then prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, was facing a general election and his rebel allies in Syria were losing ground to regime forces. The offensive on Kessab was intended to bolster both the insurgents and their Turkish backers.
During weeks of planning before the assault, rebel fighters were given strict orders to use the offensive to show themselves as “moderate Muslims” and natural allies of the West.
Kessab is protected by a mountain range, acting as a natural fortress against invasion, and the Turkish border almost surrounds the town. It was only when Turkish troops allowed free movement across the frontier that the rebels were able to storm and capture Kessab.
In the first hours, all appeared to be going according to plan. Insurgents, including those from the Islamist group Ahrar al-Sham, posed for pictures showing them protecting churches and talking gently to local people.
About 30 Armenians, who had been too elderly or frail to escape the offensive, were placed on minibuses and driven to Turkey, where they were given a warm reception that was covered in minute detail by state television.
Ignoring the participation of Islamist extremists in the offensive – including a large number of foreign jihadists – Ahmed Jarba, the head of the Syrian National Coalition, travelled to Kessab and claimed a victory.
But immediately after the media spotlight fell away, residents of Kessab told the Telegraph that the desecration began.
“They took photographs to show they were looking after the churches, and then set them alight,” said Father Miron Avedissian, priest of the Armenian Apostolic church that was largely destroyed. “It all still happened in the first day.”
If Western-backed rebels tried to stop the rampage by their extremist allies, there was little evidence of a struggle.
Doors, walls and shopfronts on the town’s narrow streets are covered in scrawled messages declaring “There is no God but Allah”…..
BUT it is always refreshing (even during the worst of times) to view a video which doesn’t stop short of apologizing for the indefensible. And it is even more telling, especially when a “seemingly” unsophisticated sort lays it on the line….linking the reasoning behind the Bastard-in-Chief’s full-on support for Muslim Brotherhood and ISIS linked “rebels” – https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=383545941818703&set=vb.240638706109428&type=2&theater
BEYOND a reasonable doubt, it is absolutely provable that the purposeful arming of avowed Islamic jihadists rises to the level of war crimes, albeit coined “rebels”.
NOW, most recognize that certain terms are bandied about with little basis in fact, whenever a political objective requires “legal” koshering…”war crimes”…yada, yada…
NEVERTHELESS, countless actionable crimes – housed under the umbrella of Obama Inc’s foreign forays – can only lead to one conclusion: the ongoing decimation of Christianity is indeed a war crime.
ASSUREDLY, the purging of Christian and minority populations under international law, if anything, qualifies as such. Moreover, although in less obvious ways, there is an underlying incitement, a negative current, surging throughout America under his watch. Indeed, its results are veering dangerously close to the edge. Racial warfare and anti-Christian mischief are leading indicators for things to come.
Our Founding Father’s #1 prinicple for breaking away from King George was simple: Freedom of Religion. Freedom to worship as you please and for government to not come between you and your faith. They bled for it.
Now, comes a King Wannabee – Barack Obama and he has Hobby Lobby in it’s sites. Pay-back for abortionists and gay rights, I suppose – why on earth would you shut down such a job producer?… why does a dog lick itself?
RESOLVED; Barack HUSSEIN Obama bears the onus and history will attest to the same!
{Egypt’s President Al-Sisi, juxtaposed – rightly so – alongside a fearless lion}
IF, even a decade ago, anyone told this investigative journalist that Egypt’s top leader would be held up as a “role model” for Arab/Muslim leadership, well, they would have been laughed at. Scorned.
AND it is surely not lost in this direction, yes, generally, Egypt’s population is highly anti-Israel and defacto anti-semitic. This is undeniable.
“Sisi is Jewish and Egypt is now under Zionist occupation.” Thus screamed a September 21, 2013 headline on Rassd, the news outlet created and backed by the Muslim Brotherhood. The story beneath the headline uses as its source the anti-Semitic conspiracy website Veterans Today, which is based in the U.S., lending it credibility in the eyes of Egyptian readers. The article explains that General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s Minister of Defense and de facto ruler is “Jewish by nationality” as his mother is a Moroccan Jew by the name of Malika Titani. Sisi’s maternal uncle is named Youri Sabbagh and is described as an important Zionist who served in Ben Gurion’s party. The story’s information has been quoted thousands of times to the extent that if you Google Sisi’s name in Arabic the first search option comes up as “Sisi Jewish”……
That anti-Semitism and its accompanying conspiracy theories are deeply embedded in Egyptian Islamist discourse is no surprise for those familiar with Egypt or Islamism, though familiarity does not lessen one’s astonishment at the bizarre and convoluted nature of the claims made in these and other stories. Perhaps more startling to outside observers is the prevalence of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories among Egypt’s non-Islamists, including its self-described liberals and even its Christian minority. Anti-Semitism is not only a dominant discourse in the country, but is rather the only common worldview shared throughout its political spectrum and among all levels of Egypt’s political class.
Given its widespread appeal and the fact that it elicits little disapproval among Egypt’s intellectuals and politicians, let alone its ordinary citizens, observers are not entirely at fault in assuming deep historical roots for the phenomena. Such assumptions, however, are misguided. Not so long ago, Egyptian intellectuals and politicians were not only, not anti-Semites; many of them were philo-Semites and even exhibited pro Zionist sentiments. In the 1920s it was not uncommon for a leading Egyptian intellectual to proclaim “the victory of the Zionist ideal is also the victory of my ideal.”
How has Egypt reached such a universal consensus on the existence of a Jewish conspiracy, with the only disagreement being on the question of who are its pawns? Why is Egyptian culture so drenched in anti-Semitism? And what are the ramifications of such an all-pervading belief on the country’s foreign relations and its future trajectory? To begin to answer those questions, one has to start by identifying the forms that anti-Semitism takes in Egypt and its foundations.
NEVERTHELESS, as proven to be the case, Arab/Muslim nations are best led under pro-western strongmen, even if said sentiment offends some “delicate” sensibilities. Oh dear…can hear the multicultural fantasists whine and opine: such viewpoints are non-democratic!
Hogwash.
ALAS, as always, truthfulness, regardless of its sting, is the ultimate disinfectant:
While hardly a democrat, he understood very well which actors would become unleashed, if the status quo was tampered with. As a result, the much ballyhooed “Arab Spring” turned into an Arab Nightmare, tethering jihadist forces in warp speed. So if blame is to be assigned to the current catastrophe – and it is one – it must start at the Commander-in-Chief’s door, as he shrilly dictated to Mubarak – GO NOW!…..
PLAIN as mud…clear as a bell too. Besides, it will take countless decades – if ever – to imbue this part of the world, its culture, with liberal and enlightened value systems.
ENTER, Al-Sisi, the west’s main Islamic/Arab hope via this blog’s previous assessment, noted back in Aug. 2013. If anything, this site is hardly Johnny-Come-Lately!
Speaking before Al-Azhar and the Awqaf Ministry on New Year’s Day, 2015, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, a vocal supporter for a renewed vision of Islam, made what must be his most forceful and impassioned plea to date on the subject.
Among other things, Sisi said that the “corpus of [Islamic] texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years” are “antagonizing the entire world”; that it is not “possible that 1.6 billion people [reference to the world’s Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants—that is 7 billion—so that they themselves may live”; and that Egypt (and the Islamic world) “is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.”
The relevant excerpt from Sisi’s speech follows (translation by Michele Antaki):
I am referring here to the religious clerics. We have to think hard about what we are facing—and I have, in fact, addressed this topic a couple of times before. It’s inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire umma [Islamic world] to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing and destruction for the rest of the world. Impossible!
That thinking—I am not saying “religion” but “thinking”—that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world. It’s antagonizing the entire world!
Is it possible that 1.6 billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world’s inhabitants—that is 7 billion—so that they themselves may live? Impossible!
I am saying these words here at Al Azhar, before this assembly of scholars and ulema—Allah Almighty be witness to your truth on Judgment Day concerning that which I’m talking about now.
All this that I am telling you, you cannot feel it if you remain trapped within this mindset. You need to step outside of yourselves to be able to observe it from the outside, to root it out and replace it with a more enlightened vision of the world.
I say and repeat again that we are in need of a religious revolution. You, imams, are responsible before Allah. The entire world, I say it again, the entire world is waiting for your next move… because this umma is being torn, it is being destroyed, it is being lost—and it is being lost by our own hands.
President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, the former Egyptian army chief who deposed the Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohamed Morsi, is very popular with the Egyptian people as well as the Coptic Christians there.
Striking a pious tone that sets him apart from former president Hosni Mubarak, Sisi also appears to be taking on the mantle of a religious reformer. He has blamed outdated “religious discourse” for holding back Egypt.
“I see that the religious discourse in the entire Islamic world has cost Islam its humanity,” Sisi said in an interview televised on May 5. “This requires us, and for that matter all leaders, to review their positions.”
With references to God and morality, Sisi may turn out to be the most outwardly pious of any of the military men to have governed Egypt since the republic was founded in 1953.
TO wit, it is no small measure for this site to nominate any Egyptian leader as “leader of the year”, but these are no ordinary times. Moreover, this public pronouncement is hardly due to TIME’s nomination, declaring him as “the most important man in the world”. Not by a long shot.
TO the contrary…when has this investigative journalist ever gone with the (mainstream) herd? Never and never.
AS noted within several commentaries, as well as through various interviews, Turkey’s role in Mid East mischief-making (which extends globally) is core.
AGREED, there are so many Islamic factions vying for top dog status it is (almost) impossible to keep up. Nevertheless, there are only a few serious players who can pull off what Erdogan has in mind. Not only that, Turkey, as a part of NATO since 1952, is more than a serious actor. Don’t ever doubt this.
BUT before we head to the latest non-published (at least within mainstream English reading dailies) “news”, let’s review what has already been proven, re Erdogan’s designs on Jerusalem.
Proof One:
FIRST and foremost, it must be understood that Erdogan is a “made man” – Mafia-like – from the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. They have his back and that is that. Mind you, it doesn’t preclude support tendered to other Islamist leaders, but they do recognize Erdogan’s power center, particularly via Barack HUSSEIN Obama!
RESULTANT, he was part and parcel to a Oct. 2013 global interview at Inquisitr, and this was before he became the President of Turkey too.
Adina Kutnicki: In answer to the all important question of Turkey, its position as a so-called “moderate” Muslim nation and its relationship to Israel, a brief backgrounder is in order. Turkey has enjoyed a “pet” relationship within the west, ever since its membership in NATO began in 1952. And, while the honeymoon lasted a little over 50 years, not too long after Prime Minister Recep Erdogan took over the helm, in March 2003, as Turkey’s 25th PM, the government’s Islamist agenda (from a secular leaning/tolerant nation) reared its head. Their volte face was not done in rapid moves, but akin to the precepts of Stealth Jihad – incrementally, phase by phase.
It is essential to acknowledge that PM Erdogan is a devoted and dedicated leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, as elucidated at Aina.org. He is also President Obama’s BFF, and this is no secret. Indeed, it is more than instructive to view their relationship in global terms, particularly since the rise of Islamism throughout Turkey merges with its entrenchment within Washington’s corridors.
“Hamas is a terrorist group in search of a home. Uprooted by the Syrian civil war, and shaken by the Egyptian coup, the Hamas leadership has taken temporary shelter in Qatar, but that tiny emirate is showing every sign that they want the Islamist radicals to move on. So where would a radical Islamist terrorist group dedicated to the eradication of the State of Israel and whose charter endorses the crudest anti-Semitism turn? Perhaps to Turkey, America’s NATO ally and a country whose leader President Obama identified as one of his top personal foreign friends.”
According to Hürriyet Daily News:
“The prime ministry in Ankara was the venue for a meeting between the head of Hamas’ political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan today. The meeting, which started at 7 p.m. and lasted for three hours, was closed to the press. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, National Intelligence Agency (MİT) chief Hakan Fidan, Deputy Undersecretary for the Prime Minister’s Office İbrahim Kalın and advisor Sefer Turan were also present at the meeting, Anadolu Agency reported. The meeting between Mashaal and Erdoğan came around four months after their latest meeting. It came at a time when rumors suggest that Mashaal, currently in exile in Qatar, is searching for another place to live.”
THEN, fast forward to the end of 2014 and to the following video heralded by Hamas’s main bandito, Khalid Mashal, as he trumpeted Erdogan as the new head of the Muslim world; the leader who will bring about the invasion of Jerusalem for the worldwide ummah الأمة الإسلامية !
BUT it is not as if certain acts, whether visibly declared as acts of war or not, go unnoticed at this site: yes, Turkey’s continuous incitement against Israelis a bullet proof qualifier.
AND now that that is settled, how many are shocked that Turkey’s President is openly – at least in front of non-western ears – revealing his declaration of war to “capture” Jerusalem, but as the first prize, the first leg of conquest, for the Muslim ummah? Of course, this is all done via his surrogates.
In the speech, which was not aired in major media (Shoebat.com was able to obtain the footage thanks to Willi Adelberger) and after the crowd calmed down their Nazi style chants, Mashal reminded that “Jerusalem is the first center of direction for Muslims. It was Konya that in 1980 when Jerusalem was threatened rose up for Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque”. Looking towards the near future Mashal declared:
As Turkey for centuries was the main defender of Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa Mosque, likewise with you are the center of the Muslim Umma (Muslim nation) which will carry on the mission of liberating Jerusalem and al-Aqsa Mosque.
At the 6:10 mark of the video Khalid Mashal declared:
know this, that strong Turkey is the strength of Palestine and of Jerusalem.
At around the 7:14 mark he exclaimed:
Turkey is the strength that represents all Muslim nations.
The crowd at that point paused and in unison with an elated should cried out “Allahu Akbar”
There is a picture of Davutoglu in front of the crowd; he can be seen right next to a young boy:
Ahmet Davutoglu, Erdogan’s right hand man, is seen instantly clapping in jubilation at such affirmations the moment Khalid Mashal spoke of conquering Jerusalem with the crowds waiving flags that stem from the Turkish favorite colors in which the Ottomans prided themselves with the “fiery red, hyacinth blue, and sulfur yellow” (Revelation 9:17) which are also the colors of the flags the neo-Ottomans like to carry. In every time one can see Davutoğlu, he is smiling in joy.
Mashal complemented the AKP Islamic party of Turkey of their accomplishments in what he termed “lightening speed to have accomplished what they accomplished for the advancement of the Muslim world”. “Allah is with us and is with you for victory” Mashal reminded of war against Israel. He ended his speech reminding that he will invite Erdogan and Davutoğlu into the Temple Mount: “We were welcomed in Istanbul and now in Konya and tomorrow we will welcome you into the platform of Al-Aqsa (Temple Mount) in the next conferences, by the will of Allah”.
It is obvious what this signifies: the Turkish government wants to invade Jerusalem in a holy war, or jihad. World War III will then be over Jerusalem, which indicates one glorious coming event: the Crusades will be revived, and the Final Crusade will occur.
What is very sad, though, is that the Muslim world still has the spirit of jihad, and we in the West are still stuck in the mindset of the Enlightenment, in which the idea of Holy War or a Crusade is mocked and seen as lunacy, and where secular wars are praised over religious wars.
MOST significantly, the question becomes: what the hell are Israel’s leaders going to do about Turkey’s declaration of war? But the fact that said query even has to be asked in the first place, more than attests to the abysmal state of (strategic) affairs within Israel’s leadership!
{
Now, comes a King Wannabee – Barack Obama and he has Hobby Lobby in it’s sites. Pay-back for abortionists and gay rights, I suppose – why on earth would you shut down such a job producer?… why does a dog lick itself?
{
Adina Kutnicki 