AS the west reels from global Islamic jihad, what is the leader of the free world doing to abate its thrust? Incontrovertibly, he is deliberately, decidedly, and incrementally siding with Islamists. This is beyond a reasonable doubt.

BUT one only needs to look at his domestic and foreign fires to glean whose side he is on. Yes, his allegiances become overwhelming clear, linkage after linkage, unless one is willfully malignant.

ADDING to his malfeasance, several very recent treacheries stand apart:

                                                 TREACHERY ONE:

ON the domestic front, his Congressional (red/green) front arms increasingly empower radical Islamists within Congress. Rep Andre Carson, a devoted Muslim, had this to say:

KNOWING this, one would expect that an American President (Congressional Repubs alike) should block Carson from sitting on ANY intelligence or related homeland security committees. Indeed, the POTUS’s fingerprints are imprinted all over Congress, regardless of the so-called separation of powers.

The lawmaker House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi plans to name to a House intelligence committee received political contributions from Islamist groups named as unindicted co-conspirators of terrorist organizations and once gave a speech in which he said that the U.S. education system should be based on the Koran.

Pelosi will name Democratic Indiana U.S. Rep. André Carson to the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, it was reported Tuesday.

Carson has raised eyebrows with some of his past political and religious remarks, and he’s received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign money from groups implicated in terrorism investigations.

In a May 26, 2012 speech at the 37th Annual Islamic Circle of North America-Muslim American Society Convention in Hartford, Conn., Carson spoke about how Islamic teachings would improve the U.S. education system.

IT is clear as a bell where Carson’s allegiances lie, and the danger he presents. Is it any wonder that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and assorted surrogates) is full square behind his appointment?

                                                    TREACHERY TWO:

CONSEQUENTIALLY, while Europe explodes, Islamists in America are not sitting idly by. We know this. Thus, what type of American leader would release the most dangerous terrorists to plot, once again, to kill Americans, his Taliban “trades” included? Rhetorical.

And Obama just keeps freeing more. These men are seasoned, trained, battle-hardened jihadis. What are they going to do, open a deli?

“Freed Gitmo Captive Opens ISIS Base in Afghanistan,” Judicial Watch, January 15, 2015:

As President Obama frees droves of terrorists—including five Yemenis this week—from the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo news reports confirm that a Gitmo alum who once led a Taliban unit has established the first Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) base in Afghanistan.

His name is Mullah Abdul Rauf and international and domestic media reports say he’s operating in Helmand province, actively recruiting fighters for ISIS. Citing local sources, a British newspaper writes that Rauf set up a base and is offering good wages to anyone willing to fight for the Islamic State. Rauf was a corps commander during the Taliban’s 1996-2001 rule of Afghanistan, according to intelligence reports. After getting captured by U.S. forces, he was sent to Gitmo in southeast Cuba but was released in 2007.

Rauf’s Department of Defense Joint Task Force Guantanamo file describes him as being closely associated with several senior level Taliban commanders and leaders. It also says that Rauf admitted involvement in the production and sales of opium as well as associations with criminal elements within the Taliban and the Northern Alliance. From the file: “Due to recent findings that detainee may have had a more important role within the Taliban than previously thought detainee’s intelligence value has been updated from low to medium due to his possible knowledge of: (1) Taliban leadership, (2) Taliban command and control.”

Rauf is one of a number of Gitmo terrorists who have returned to the fight after getting released, yet Obama continues freeing captives to keep his campaign promise of closing the prison. Just this week he let four Yemenis go, despite the risk that they will likely join Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, the Yemen-based terror group that claimed responsibility for last week’s attack in France. In fact, dozens of freed Gitmo detainees have rejoined Al Qaeda in Yemen, the country where the 2009 Christmas Day airline bomber proudly trained. In 2010 Judicial Watch reported that a number of high-ranking Al Qaeda militants in Yemen—once held at Gitmo—may have been involved in a sophisticated scheme to send bombs on a U.S.-bound cargo plane….

But his anti-American (western) foreign fires are even more bold-faced, egregiously so, when he thwarts an important Middle East leader from fighting Islamic jihad. In other words, Egypt’s El-Sisi is battling the Muslim Brotherhood and its global arms, all the while the Islamist-in-Chief empowers them, both domestically and worldwide! As demonstrated, each and every jihadi explosion IS linked to one of the Brotherhood Mafia’s tentacles.

Political battle lines between the Egyptian government led by el-Sisi and the Barack Obama administration, which leads the U.S., have been drawn. A major salvo was fired on January 1st, when Egyptian president, Gen. Abdel Fatah el-Sisi admonished Islamic scholars at al-Azhar University. As Shoebat.com reported, this was a brazen statement against Barack Obama himself, who nearly six years earlier launched his pro-Muslim Brotherhood / pro-Arab Spring agenda in a speech at that very same university.

In many ways, what el-Sisi did to Obama from a podium at al-Azhar was the political equivalent of what he did by leading the overthrow of Mohammed Mursi in 2013. It was also a speech that created pro-Obama and pro-Sisi camps by providing a stark contrast to the Obama ideology that western leaders like Cameron of the UK, Hollande of France and Merkel of Germany have not.

Days later, on January 7th, it was events that provided even more contrast as Muslim terrorists in Paris murdered people in cold blood for their speech. Western leaders send muddled messages instead of clear ones. The best example can be seen in the much ballyhooed Paris march on January 11th that included Cameron, Hollande and Merkel showing solidarity with Mahmoud Abbas and Turkey’s Ahmet Davutoglu.

Normally reliable conservative Newt Gingrich attempted to put his finger on the problem by going after Obama for not attending the Paris rally. Gingrich concluded Obama is either cowardly or crazy. Neither is correct; Obama is pro-Muslim Brotherhood because his family is part of the organization and Egyptians are the only ones who have been so vocal about this; they also have the proof.

TO further elucidate the stark, ominous, and contrasting worldviews – between the heretofore leader of the free world on the one hand, juxtaposed against Egypt’s El-Sisi’s struggle against the Muslim Brotherhood via Islam’s global thrust – look no further than to Israel’s foremost strategic policy analyst, Dr. Martin Sherman, a close contact. 

HIS most recent Jerusalem Post column is more than noteworthy:

Ironically, Sisi spoke at the same venue that Barack Obama chose to deliver his 2009 “Outreach Speech” to the Muslim world. But the contrast between the two could hardly be more striking. As one US analyst deftly noted: “Obama began the 2009 speech by praising the same seminary that Sisi reprimanded,” emphasizing “That [Obama’s approach] is different from Sisi, who is trying to suppress the Brotherhood movement and push Al-Azhar’s Islamic leaders toward modernity “Sisi used the occasion to condemn the ongoing practices in the Islamic world, after having coercively removed the regressive and ruinous regime of the Muslim Brotherhood from power.

By contrast, Obama heaped effusive praise on Islam, and insisted on places of honor for senior Brotherhood representatives – to the chagrin of his host, president Hosni Mubarak. Indeed, many consider Obama’s words and gestures in Cairo as providing a considerable – arguably, crucial – fillip in the process that swept the Brotherhood to power barely two years later.…..(read the whole thing)

MOST significantly, Americans, westerners alike, must understand that behind EVERY Sunni Islamic group beats a Brotherhood linked group. Moreover, don’t waste your energy separating the Sunni from the Shia, as long as America, the west, is the target. Yes, Shias also FULLY cooperate with Sunni Brotherhood jihadists. Shia Iran facilitated, plotted and gave cover to Sunni Al Qaeda to bring about 9/11/01, as delineated within a federal district court ruling in the Havlish decision. Their jihadi cooperation has nothing to do with their centuries long inter-tribal warfare. Historically, just as long as the west is the target, their hegemonic struggles are (temporarily) cast aside. Never forget this. 

A federal district court in Manhattan yesterday entered a historic ruling that reveals new facts about Iran's support of al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks. U.S. District Judge George B. Daniels ruled yesterday that Iran and Hezbollah materially and directly supported al Qaeda in the September 11, 2001 attacks and are legally responsible for damages to hundreds of family members of 9/11 victims who are plaintiffs in the case.  

Judge Daniels had announced his ruling in Havlish,   et   al.   v. bin Laden,   et   al. , in open court on Thursday, December 15, 2011, following a three-hour courtroom presentation by the families' attorneys.  Judge Daniels entered a written Order of Judgment yesterday backed by 53 pages of detailed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.  

Fiona Havlish, whose husband Donald perished in the World Trade Center North Tower on 9/11 said, "This is a historic day.  For ten years we've wanted the truth to be known about who was responsible forour losses.  Now we have that answer......"

FOLKS, the entire legal rendering is mind numbing. Read it.

NOT only that, but the POTUS is Allah bent on forging a “deal” with Iran’s mullahs, knowing full well that 9/11/01 was as much their handiwork, as it was Al Qaeda’s! Why isn’t this “tidbit” front and center, especially as he tightens the screws on those in Congress who want to increase the (sanctions) pressure on Iran?

BUT think of it this way: what would have happened to the leader of the free world during WW 2, had he aligned the nation with the Nazi war machine, instead of siding with western powers?

HINT: he would not have lasted 24 hours in office, and that would have been for starters. His days would have been numbered, literally. Capital punishment-like.

THE urgent question becomes: why are millions of patriotic Americans allowing (by not surrounding the White House via their absolute right to democratically protest – however long it takes – they give him their consent) the Traitor-in-Chief to form an alliance with the Islamic axis?

 

 {re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

 {re-blogged at Joe For America}