ONE can be forgiven for thinking that Islam is against homosexual behavior and all that it entails – with sodomy at the forefront – but you would be wrong! After all, haven’t you heard: said “dabblings” are part of the west’s decadence and Islam is much “purer” than western culture! Oh boy. Interesting. Supremely arrogant alike. A whole lot of hooey and phooey too. But alongside their fantastical (and barbaric) continuum, who hasn’t been privy to this outright doozy: there are NO gays in Iran!
ON its face, the above is such a gargantuan lie (on so many levels) that it screams to the heavens to set the record straight. But it is precisely due to the sexual components and the rages – which are deeply rooted in Islam and its culture – that this investigative journalist wades into Islam’s gooey backdrop. Its basis is responsible for a goodly portion of their explosions. Hmm.
YET, to understand Islam’s explosive underpinnings, one also has to understand its psychological and Koranic basis. In turn, one will then be able to glean a clearer picture, as to some of the core paradoxes and boiling rages within Islam’s followers.
STIPULATED, on the one hand, Islamic culture encourages murderous actions towards homosexuals, yet, at the same time, its roots also completely intersect with the gay agenda! Bedfellows. Sheesh.
THEREBY, for some clarity of thought – as a first step and western stop – look no further than to the Council of Islamic Ideology!
MOST significantly, westerners must delve into related Koranic underpinnings: jihad’s sexual components galore!
ONCE the above has been digested, segue into a particular component via explanatory “memorandums”: jihadi barbarism binds with Islam’s sexual and cultural rage…ala the Madonna-whore complex! A fiery cauldron. But there’s more…additional Koranic imperatives have been inspired by Muhammad.
ALAS, we are led to the climax: ISIS leaders (and many Islamic jihadists, regardless of whom they pledge allegiance to) have their own initiation ceremonies and they are following in their “prophet’s” deviant path: sodomy galore!
AND to lend starker context and texture to this commentary’s basis, the following is more than necessary reading:
ISIS are a bunch of homosexual, anti-Christian murderers. They are the purest form of the homosexual agenda, and they are just as evil and anti-Christian, as the reprobate sodomites in the West. There is a recent report that reveals that ISIS officials have homosexual sex with other men in their tents.
According to the report:
In a joint statement released on August 13 2014 two senior United Nations officials spoke out against Isis’ “barbaric acts” of sexual violence and “savage rapes” of Iraqi minorities. “We are gravely concerned by continued reports of acts of violence, including sexual violence against women and teenage girls and boys belonging to Iraqi minorities,” Zainab Hawa Bangura and Nickolay Mladenov said.
One detail in Arango’s story, however, stands out: it is the reference to homosexual sex in an Isis training camp. “He [Barho] said he saw men having sex with other men behind the tents in the desert night.”
An interesting article on the homosexual connection with Islam and Islamic history wrote that nowhere in the Quran is homosexuality explicitly condemned:
Until the modern era, there was no word for sodomy in Arabic or Persian. Nor is there any prohibition of it in the Quran. Some make reference to the destruction of the town identified as Sodom of the Old Testament (which is supposed to be the origin of the word sodomy) in the Quran, Surah 15: 73-77 as if it were the source. But it is quite clear that the city was destroyed because its inhabitants refused to offer hospitality to strangers. Where does the prohibition against sodomy come from? The reference is to some hadith, the sayings and acts of the Prophet Muhammad, which the Sunni interpretation of Islam uses to provide a legal basis for legal matters not covered in the Quran.
A recent article by Elyse Semerdjian that dealt with cases brought before the shariah court in Aleppo over a period of 359 years when it was under Ottoman control has turned up four, but only one concerning sodomy against a young man and his mother. The youngster is supposed to have brought men known to be involved in sodomy to his home to the anger of the people of his neighborhood. The two were expelled from their community, a customary punishment for prostitution that had become noticeable enough to disturb the neighbors. Sodomites, on the other hand, were not punished.
The article continues on to describe a very disturbing ritual called “Sema” in which Sufi mystics would surround young boys and stare at them until they fell into a demonic trance:
Some of the Sufis even organized what were known as “sema” during which ceremonies, they would sit in a circle and concentrate on the beautiful young boys in the center, concentrating to such an extent on what they perceived as beauty that they might fall into a trance.
Muhammad, contrary to Scripture, in fact wore the clothes of his child-bride Aisha as a ritual to receive revelation from Allah.
In the Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 2442,
Chapter 52, Muhammad says:
The revelation does not come to me when I am in the garment of any woman except ‘A’isha.
In Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 3941, the same impostor states:
Do not hurt me with Aisha; for by Allah, the inspiration did not descent on me while I was in the coverings (lihaf) of any of you (women) except Aisha.”
In the Sahih collection of Imam Muslim, Hadith Number 4472, one Zaynab Bint Jahsh requests a visit to see Muhammad
while he was with Aisha in (fee) her robe (Mirt) and in the same state that Fatimah found him in.”
As we write in our book, For God or For Tyranny, the Quran itself promises boy loving for jihadists in paradise.
The followers of Muhammad consisted of mukhannathun, or cross dressers. It is the same word as mukhannatah, which in Arabic means homosexual.
Daayiee Abdullah, an openly gay imam, describes the mukhannathun as
sort of a male-female, cross-dressing types. They existed. And they also lived or worked in the household of the Prophet. Aisha, one of the Prophet’s wives, indicated that there were men who worked in the household. They were mukhannathun. That generally meant that they were not necessarily castrated, but not having an interest in women.
Muhammad not only was a cross-dresser, but he had gay friends. So the next time you hear a modern Christian laud himself for having gay friends and criticize the church for prohibiting homosexuality, let him know that Jesus wouldn’t have gay friends, but Muhammad did.
Islam wants to destroy Christianity (blogger’s note: Judaism as well) and replace it with a heretical pagan homosexual empire.
INDEED, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt: just as the Nazis persecuted (then killed) gays, said murderous rage jives with the fact that the highest ranked Nazis were themselves gay, as were many of their followers!
HISTORY be told, the facts have been, to say the least, altered. Skewed. In point of fact, the actual persecution and killing of gays was precipitated by “rumors” of the Nazi party’s rampant homosexuality! A deflective and murderous onslaught ensued. Yup, they preferred to remain, as is said, “in the closet.”
MORE specifically, it becomes very clear why Islamists have ALWAYS joined hands with Nazi socialists, akin to Hitler and the Mufti of Jerusalem.
HISTORICALLY, their alliance (the reds and greens) has been a combination of two core pillars: both are rabid haters of Jews and Christians. In tandem, the Nazi Party’s roots were FOUNDED in the gay agenda, whereas the cultural/religious roots of homosexuality are endemic to Islamic doctrine and its culture. Beyond a tie-in. Moreover, it is a fact that both are also totalitarian and fascist ideologies.
INTERESTINGLY, as CNN (can’t believe they even opened up this “taboo” subject…but no matter) reported on the murders of homosexuals by ISIS, they stopped short (now, that’s NOT a shock) of the root cause: Islam!
AS added heft to the above Islamic roots, many have heard about the “dancing boys” of Afghanistan, but tend to view the issue as an anomaly within the far off land of this particular and peculiar nation. Not so fast.
DEMONSTRABLY, Islamic culture, its “religious” mandates, are of piece with child rape and sexual jihad. A + B.
STILL, not to be overlooked within this discussion, one cannot deny that the left, for all their so-called mantle of “tolerance”, is TOTALLY silent (thus, forgiving) re the barbaric treatment of gays within Islamic nations. Damn hypocrites.
IN other words, feministas (aka femi-Nazis) and their squishy male counterparts have nothing to say when Islamic-led nations persecute and murder gays. Not only that, but where are their voices when they find out that said Islamists sexually (and serially) abuse young boys and girls, all for their own lust and pleasure? Is that not a crime, and by any civilized yard stick? Have they no hearts, no shame, or have they joined hands – through the red/green alliance – simply because their hatred of the west overrides all else, including the crime of pedophilia?
SO any time “progressive” spokespeople (male or female) stand astride their soapboxes screaming about “tolerance” and the “right always being wrong”, jab them with this…plus more of the same: do you, or do you not, agree that throwing gays off roofs (though it hits too close to home for some, as many of the aforementioned are part of the gay agenda….oh dear…a complete sexual and ideological conundrum…), as well as criminally/serially abusing children, is worth screaming about? And doesn’t locking arms with said monsters make you one of the same?
CONCLUSIVELY, Islam’s gay agenda is abundantly clear. Follow its roots.