(Anita M. Najiy…the “subject of interest”…Assistant Chief of Police, City of Miami Police congratulates Jorge R. Colina as Assistant Chief of Police during the promotions of seven executive staff members for the City of Miami Police on Friday, April 17, 2015)
AS is said, a picture is worth a thousand words. Even more so, some are assigned a higher “market” value.
IN this regard, oftentimes, what is missing from a certain photo is the authentic and inner pictorial, the heart and thrust of the situation. In other words, when a law enforcement official, a top cop, fails to acknowledge the pledge of allegiance, what exactly does that signal as to “intent”? Could it be any clearer?
(Assistant Chief (Muslim) Anita Najiy, just left of the flag, has raised the ire of police union head Javier Ortiz.)
The head of the city’s police union is accusing the assistant chief of police, Anita Najiy, of lacking respect for the United States, and he’s circulating a video he says should lead to disciplinary action against her. Her alleged crime against America? Not holding her hand over her heart during the Pledge of Allegiance.
Fraternal Order of Police President Javier Ortiz was in the front row at a promotional event last week at Miami Police College to film Najiy, a 32-year-veteran of the agency, during the pledge. As other members placed their hands over their hearts, Najiy kept her arms by her sides.
In doing so, Ortiz says, she failed to exhibit courtesy and etiquette that “must be exercised when wearing a law enforcement uniform.”
“If you’re not pledging allegiance to the United States, my question is what country are you pledging allegiance to?” Ortiz says. “Anyone who isn’t offended by that is not American, because when you become a U.S. citizen, you pledge allegiance to the .US.”
Yesterday evening, Ortiz sent a letter to Chief Rodolfo Llanes outlining the event. He also suggested appropriate discipline, including Najiy’s removal from a commander position.
Though the police department’s code of conduct allows for reprimand if an officer doesn’t salute the flag, it makes no mention of protocol during the Pledge of Allegiance, according to the Miami Herald.
The Herald also reports that part of the code of conduct for U.S. military personnel supersedes the police’s code — and it states that “when in uniform, indoors, stand at attention, remain silent, and face the flag.”
And that’s exactly what Najiy did. Still, the matter is “currently under review,” according to a spokesman from the Miami Police Department.
That’s not Ortiz’s only complaint. He also says he’s heard “rumors” that Najiy is Muslim, adding that if true, he respects her religion but that some normal “protections” of the freedoms of religion and speech don’t apply to those in police uniform, because “you’re supposed to be neutral.”
“The flag is a symbol of our country,” he says. “What is the difference if I decide to light a U.S. flag on fire in a police uniform?”
Najiy declined to discuss the complaint with New Times.
MOREOVER, the fact that she is part of 3 ! protected classes – female, Muslim and Black – she can literally get away with breaching all protocol (and much more) and will remain untouchable. What a deal.
SO, let’s get real: feministas aka femi-nazis; Blacks; most resolutely, Muslims and their apologists, will have her back. Like night follows day. But no matter. This is a very serious national issue, and involves much more than her personal “F U”, leaving aside her smiling and smug mug. She recognizes the cards she holds, and that she has little to fear from the top brass! Media in toto.
INDUBITABLY, Najiy is a committed Muslim and this is the reason why she stood – at an OFFICIAL police ceremony – with her hands at her sides, failing to pledge her allegiance to America! She surely had the forethought to internalize that her non-pledge would be frowned upon. She didn’t care. This is because her real and authentic allegiance lies elsewhere. Americans (westerners) must understand this core aspect, otherwise none of what is transpiring, the visceral hostility within the Muslim community, will make sense. Resonate.
RESOLUTELY, she mirrored – akin to a like-minded anti-American, HUSSEIN Obama – his “F U” non-salute pictorial! Concomitantly, the absence of his pledge!
YES, while Senator, in Oct. 2007, sans hand-over-heart, he was the lone “objector” (even Hill, as despicable as she is, didn’t dare to demonstrate said open disdain) during a ceremonial event when the pledge of allegiance was recited. Indeed, the pic was vetted six ways to Sunday and deemed authentic. That is that.
TO wit, what should we conclude from the fact that BOTH leaders (a preponderance of Muslims alike) refused to openly pledge their allegiance to the United States of America? Simply put, it must be viewed through the eyes, the prism, of a Muslim, and their commitments derived thereof. Forthwith, remove your (American) glasses to see the true picture.
FIRST and foremost, it must be recognized that said stances are not akin to general protests against the flag, even by those who are ill-advised to do so, at least while operating in an official capacity. In uniform, no less.
ALAS, relative to Miami’s Deputy Police Chief, while her behavior was a breach of protocol, offensive and certainly grounds for demotion, her action – or lack thereof, like HUSSEIN Obama’s – stemmed from her one and only allegiance; to Allah and the Muslim ummah. NEVER forget this and that.
INDEED, the Islamic pledge is incumbent upon ALL Muslims, regardless of their western locale. Resultant, pledges of allegiance to ones (resident) nation is forbidden and sinful in Islam. Ḥarām… حَرَام … Understood?
THUS, in a bare-bones manner, what this means is that the very LAST pledge – evidenced in the above order of commitments – is to America, and only if what is expected of them, as Americans, is not in contradiction to Islamic Law, the Shariah. Immutable.
EXTRAPOLATING further, since Shariah Law is in DIRECT contravention to the Constitution, it is absolutely impossible to fulfill their very last pledge, though inserted for appearance’s sake. Their hierarchical order of allegiances are NOT random in nature.
INCONTROVERTIBLY – just as one example out of enumerable – the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, is considered blasphemy under Sharia Law. It is this Islamic edict, blasphemy, which underpinned (even demanded) the recent massacre of the entire team of Charlie Hebdo. In fact, all of the non-stop Muslim rampages throughout the world – whenever an “insult” is perceived towards Islam – stem from Shariah Law. For the record, the weapon of “Islamophobia” was conceived to silence and mute all such “criticism”! This is one such merging/marriage of stealth and frontal jihad.
NOT only that, but the knock-on effect (one of many) to the aforementioned is the evisceration of freedom of religion, again, inviolate and rooted in the U.S. Constitution but unacceptable within Islam! We can go up and down the line and come to the same irrefutable findings: Islam is incompatible, in DIRECT conflict, with the west due to Shariah Law. Conclusively, sans Shariah Law there is NO Islam.
DEAR readers, Muslims (exclusive of apostates from Islam, whether they officially convert to another religion or want nothing to do with Islam) simply can’t pledge their allegiance, hence, immerse, within western nations. This is the central and key element to what accounts for much of their ingratitude when living in the west. Fuggedaboutit!
MOST significantly, first and foremost, they commit themselves to Allah. It is this pledge which abrogates their ability to properly integrate, regardless of anything else.
KNOW this: none of their hostility stems from economic factors, in fact, the polar opposite is true. Incontrovertibly, a preponderance of the leading terrorists (increasingly, their followers alike) enjoy financial success and possess higher educational degrees, yet, their wealth and opportunities do not dissuade them from jihad.
AND for more proof-in-the-pudding:
Dr Tareq Kamleh is filmed cradling a newborn baby in a hospital in the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa in Syria, saying: “Please consider coming, please don’t delay.’’
The blue-eyed paediatrician says he is offering his medical services as part of his “jihad for Islam”.
The Sunday Times can reveal Dr Kamleh made multiple visits to an army surplus store in Perth late last year to buy gear for his trip.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency website shows he was registered as a medical practitioner in Subiaco in 2010.
A former friend said Dr Kamleh, now going by the name Abu Yusuf, left Perth for Adelaide to begin his medical degree about 10 years ago.
After graduating from Adelaide University, he began his pediatrics career at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
The friend, who knew Dr Kamleh when he was a paediatric registrar in 2011, said he showed no signs of radicalisation.
“I am just shocked and sort of saddened for him because it’s the end of his life in Australia, I imagine,” the friend said.
The video introduces the “ISHS” – or IS Health Service – and features a number of doctors talking about medical facilities.
Dr Kamleh is filmed telling converts that his only regret is not joining the terrorist state sooner.
A worker at the Perth surplus store said a man instantly recognisable as the doctor in the video made multiple visits last December.
The worker said the man spent $400 on a backpack, jacket, socks and several pairs of pants popular with security contractors in the Middle East.
“He didn’t speak about Islam or anything to do with religion during the entire conversation,” he said.
“Take away the beard and I just thought he was a young doctor going overseas to do his part.”…
SO, post haste, erase all that nonsense, as Harf barfed via her State Dept. story line fairy tale!
IN fact, Jews (Christians et al) are not religiously obligated to choose sides, rather, they are encouraged to show gratitude for the countries that they live in. Oh yeah.
THUS, as an American-Israeli (living in Israel), this investigative journalist feels goosebumps when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance or singing the Star Spangled Banner, each and every time. Similarly, when singing Hatikvah, Israel’s national anthem.
AN equal stirring of the patriotic heart. No divided loyalties.
STIPULATED, herein underlies the key and core to a committed Muslim’s refusal to place hand-over-heart; Islam’s civilizational jihad!