AS is said, like father like son. Now, if ones father is a stand up guy – whether a rich man, poor man, or somewhere in between – this is a man a son should strive to emulate. On the other hand, when a son has a father who is less than honorable – in ways that would make a whore blush – it is time to look for a new role model!
ALAS, imagine, in your mind’s eye, the Islamist-in-Chief opining: “If I had a son, he’d look/act like Ahmed.” Indeed, Trayvon redux.
IN other words, since the clock-meister has an equally Islamist papa, at the very least, the families are kindred spirits. Not only that, apparently, he is the progeny of a blow hard, and a Sudanese-American supremacist to boot. Said charge will be proven below, just wait. Therefore, Ahmed could definitely be HUSSEIN Obama’s spawn. And, more pointedly, his papa continually shrieks: “Islamophobia!” Ouch…bleeding ears…
WHICH brings us to the recent kerfuffle, regarding the 14 year old Muslim who caught the White House’s eye – what a shock – even while there are so many national/international fires raging. Hmm. HUSSEIN Obama has the time for a “sit down” with an “offended” 14 year old! Credo quia absurdum.
The Muslim teenager arrested for bringing his home-made clock into school which teachers claimed ‘looked like a bomb’ has said he will go to the White House to visit Barack Obama after the President extended an invite to him earlier in the day.
Ahmed Mohamed, 14, received messages of support from across the globe today after an image of him being handcuffed and escorted out of MacArthur High School, in Irving, Texas, went viral.
Among the outpouring of sympathy was a message from Obama inviting Ahmed to bring his clock to the White House, an offer that the teenager said he would accept this evening.
Speaking at a press conference on CBS, Ahmed also thanked Obama, Democrat Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg for their messages of support, saying he is ‘pleased’ they oppose what happened to him.
Obama had tweeted: ‘Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It’s what makes America great.’
In addition,it has been noted that Mohamed’s father, Mohamed ElHassan Mohamed, is a known activist who has engaged in several stunts to call out what he has perceived to be anti-Islamic activity.
Mohamed himself has even implied in a YouTube video that he knew that the clock he had built looked suspicious and threatening.
“I closed [the ‘clock’] with a cable, I didn’t want to lock it to make it seem like a threat. So I just used a simple cable so it won’t look that much suspicious.” Ahmed stated.
NOW, the so-called budding scientist is nothing of the sort. Mind you, there is no claim on this end to being an electronics expert (that’s an understatement, in reality, a hoot), but there are others who are. In fact, here is some of their expert diagnoses via requisite due diligence: Looks like the Whole Little Ahmed Mohamed Clock Deal May Be A Fraud! Not only that, but it is further asserted: Muslim boy’s “cool clock” is a fraud, says expert!
The most famous clock in America is a “fraud,” according to an electronics expert who says 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed did not invent anything and simply took a commercial clock out of its manufactured case…..
“Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It’s what makes America great,” tweeted Obama.
Mohamed also received invitations to meet Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and go to NASA and MIT.
Twitter has offered him an internship. TV hosts Stephen Colbert and Ellen DenGeneres have called him.
But is the whole invention a sham?
In a YouTube video that received hundreds of thousands of views in just the first 24 hours, electrical expert Thomas Talbot dissects (click on link) a photo of Mohamed’s clock.
EVEN more so, shouldn’t Ahmed be re-arrested for perpetrating what is clearly a “Islamophobia” hoax, scaring the daylights out of the school to begin with??
Little Ahmed, the so-called Muslim boy ‘genius,’ didn’t invent anything, didn’t even build anything. He took apart an existing clock, and transplanted the guts into a pencil box, and claimed it was his own creation.
Why was the device in English class in the first place, especially after the engineering teacher told him not to show it around? When confronted by police and his English teacher, why didn’t Mohammed just tell them to talk to the engineering teacher? When police asked Ahmed what the device was and why he brought it to school, according to WFAA:
Officers said Ahmed was being “passive aggressive” in his answers to their questions, and didn’t have a “reasonable answer” as to what he was doing with the case. Investigators said the student told them that it was just a clock that he was messing around with. “We attempted to question the juvenile about what it was and he would simply only say it was a clock. He didn’t offer any explanation as to what it was for, why he created this device, why he brought it to school,” said James McLellan, Irving Police.
Here’s the statute Ahmed Mohammed authorities originally suspected Mohammed of violating (Texas Penal Code Section 46.08):
(a) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly manufactures, sells, purchases, transports, or possesses a hoax bomb with intent to use the hoax bomb to:
(1) make another believe that the hoax bomb is an explosive or incendiary device; or
(2) cause alarm or reaction of any type by an official of a public safety agency or volunteer agency organized to deal with emergencies.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
Nobody said Mohammed built an actual bomb. They suspected that he had wanted to frighten or alarm officials with a hoax-bomb. The police said that initially, it was “not immediately evident” that the clock-in-a-case was a class experiment – perfectly plausible, given that Mohammed built the clock-in-a-case voluntarily, without assignment, and in conjunction with no science fair.
Chief Larry Boyd said simply and correctly, “You can’t take things like that to school” without explanation or assignment in today’s world without it receiving scrutiny. And according to the cops, Ahmed was significantly more cooperative with friendly media than with the police who came to ask some simple questions.
Now, let’s look at Ahmed’s father, Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed, a millionaire, social justice activist, and potential tax fraud.
Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed, has a lengthy history as a troll and publicity hound. But that’s too negative. He is also a sophisticated and intelligent man., who started from the bottom and worked his way up to the top, ultimately selling his taxi cab company for millions of dollars. His success will somehow be used to show how unwelcoming America is to Muslim immigrants.
Yet that’s not all Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed has done. Mr. Elhassan Mohamed is a political activist who also trolls for attention. He has made two unsuccessful runs for the president of the Sudan.
In a Feb. 2015 interview (Irving resident makes his second bid for election as President of Sudan), Mohamed Elhassan Mohamed claimed to be serving as president of the AlSufi Center in Irving Texas. According to the non-partisan watchdog group GuideStar, the AlSufi Center was shut down for tax issues. (See, Nonprofit Profile for AlSufi Center.)
Ahmed’s father, as Pamela Geller points out, is an anti-Islamophobia media gadfly. He routinely returns to Sudan to run for president; he has debated anti-Koran Florida pastor Terry Jones, partially in order to bring his children to Disneyworld. In 2011, the Washington Post wrote of him:
Elhassan, a native of the Sudan who is now an American citizen, likes to call himself a sheik. He wears a cleric’s flowing white robes and claims hundreds of followers throughout Egypt, Sudan and in the United States. But he is unknown as a scholar or holy man in the state he has called home for two decades. Religious leaders in Texas say they have never heard of Elhassan, including the imam at the mosque where he worships.
The New York Daily News reported this Wednesday about Ahmed Mohamed’s father, Mohamed ElHassan Mohamed:
One of the earliest instances of the standout citizen making national news was in 2011, when he sensationally stood up to an anti-Islamic pastor and defended the Koran as its defense attorney. That mock trial at a Florida church ended with the book’s burning, to ElHassan’s claimed shock. In an interview with the Washington Post at the time, the devoted Muslim said he’d take on Rev. Terry Jones’ challenge because the holy book teaches that Muslims should engage in peaceful dialogue with Christians.
It’s no surprise that Ahmed Mohammed’s dad ran to the cameras at the first opportunity. It’s also no surprise that the terror-connected Council on American-Islamic Relations arrived to push the Islamophobia narrative immediately.
And as Ian Tuttle of National Review has pointed out, America has become extra-paranoid of late: students have been suspended for gun-shaped Pop Tarts, cap guns, finger guns, and saying the word gun, among other grave offenses. And we don’t even need weapons to suspend students anymore: wearing an American flag at the wrong time or donning a Confederate flag t-shirt will do it.
So why, after the detention and release, did this story become a national one? Why did Obama jump on this story? Why did Hillary jump on this story? Where were they for then-16-year-old Kiera Wilmot of Florida to the White House after she was arrested and suspended in 2013 for bringing an experiment with toilet cleaner and aluminum foil to school? She was black but not Muslim, so it didn’t serve the narrative. They were MIA.
For years, the Obama administration has pushed the notion that American Muslims are in danger of Islamophobic backlash. But as of 2012, 62.4 percent of all anti-religious hate crimes targeted Jews; 11.6 percent targeted Muslims; as of 2013, anti-Jewish hate crimes represented 60.3 percent of all hate crimes, as opposed to just 13.7 percent for Muslims.
That’s a major decline in anti-Islamic hate crimes since 2001, when 55.7 percent of hate crimes were anti-Jewish, and anti-Muslim hate crimes constituted 27.2 percent of all hate crimes.
So where, exactly, are all the invitations to Jewish students targeted in hate crime incidents?
They don’t exist, because they don’t help President Obama castigate America as xenophobic and backwards – and just as importantly, castigate Texans as particularly likely to don white hoods and go hunt down some Sufis.
Mark Cuban appeared on Real Time with Bill Maher to discuss the story. Cuban confirmed two facts:
- Ahmed was a puppet (his sister was feeding him answers).
- Ahmed showed the “clock” to every teacher until he finally got the desired response.
This was a troll job/hoax.
INHERENTLY, it is not for nothing that CAIR is inexorably in this site’s cross hairs, knowing full well that it was established as the Brotherhood Mafia’s propaganda arm.
IS it any wonder that they are also front and center in spearheading the uproar against Dr. Ben Carson, for having the “temerity” to state: A Muslim shouldn’t be POTUS!
BOTTOM LINE: In the same manner in which there are laws against screaming fire in a crowded theater, so too there should be laws (after all, is it still America, or the Shariah States of America?) against those who incite against “bigoted” America in order to facilitate stealth jihad! Where is the nexus?
Wolff Bachner: After the Muslim Brotherhood took control of the government in Egypt, despite their constant promises that they had no interest in holding political office or influencing Egypt’s elections, we began to see and hear a new expression used to describe their activities; Stealth Jihad. What is Stealth Jihad and how is the Muslim Brotherhood using this powerful new weapon to achieve their goals?
Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, you are obviously up to speed on your Islamic verbiage. Definitely, Stealth Jihad is a mandatory concept to master. So, in order to follow the winding, often unfamiliar terrain attributed to Islam’s thrust into the west, its essence must be adequately explored.
It revolves around the ability of dedicated Islamists to fly below the (communal/national) radar, but only until the Islamic community is strong enough – both politically, economically and otherwise – to emerge from the shadows. Operating out of full view affords anonymity, yet allows jihadists to build up as many war chests as possible. Two key components are monetary bases and hidden terror cells. They must be ready and prepared to spring into frontal action, if necessary. As a matter of record, staying burrowed for years is often a requirement. As is said, “hiding in plain sight” is more than a saying to Islamists. It is an actual method of jihad!
But if one example stands out among countless others, look no further than to a recent commentary, which commemorates the 12th memorial of 9/11/01. The DESECRATION of 9/11/01: Stealth Jihad” Via Mosques; Adnan Oktar’s Turkish-Islamic Union, Taqiyya”, Penetrates Into Jewish/Israeli Media/Power Centers – Where Is The Nexus? demonstrates the despicable and dangerous lengths the Muslim Brotherhood pursues to effectuate their agenda. The submission (Islam literally means “to submit”) of the west to Shariah Law, as described in just one of many YouTube interviews with Islamic leaders, is anything, but circumspect, despite their usage of Stealth Jihad.
So, while the Muslim Brotherhood utilizes a mix of Stealth Jihad – in combination with “frontal/open jihad” – for this discussion, let us stick to what is less visible, than what is more readily apparent, that is, exploding body parts….
MOST significantly, softening up the public – to “prove” that Muslims are “victims” of “Islamophobia” – allows them to stealthily manipulate public opinion, as well as the legal system. And, this is where CAIR, its propaganda arm, always jumps in. Their raison d’etre.
IN the main, the end goal is to implement Shariah Law. If that sounds too fantastical, so be it. However, the fact remains that they have been wildly successful, so much so that the Brotherhood Mafia’s Plan is ahead of schedule. Almost a done deal. Believe it – or not.
BESIDES, readers, decide whether or not Ahmed’s handlers accomplished the above through their staged propaganda stunt, understanding full well that the leftist media (aside from alternative media who understand what’s going on) would canonize him, decry the “bigots”, and with nary anyone questioning: What the hell just happened? Not only that, the story that sticks is ALWAYS the one which leads first, that is, that Ahmed was a “victim” of “Islamophobia!”
NOW, isn’t that exactly how it went down, as if from an Islamist play-by-play book?