IT is impossible to quantify the amount of grave damage accrued to freedom of speech within America (as well as throughout the west) due to self-censorship and the Brotherhood’s stealth-like enforcers.
INCONTESTABLY, few require an explanatory memorandum re “frontal” jihad, yes, flying body parts will suffice. And if one’s mind cannot (mentally) revert back to 9/11/01, well, that’s understandable. However, the failure to internalize the nuanced tactics endemic to stealth jihad amounts to a fatal flaw, relative to ones national obligations. The fact remains that the latter Islamic mandated directive is destroying America and other western nations. Regardless, certain subjects are requisite and dare not be considered as elective courses, especially, Blasphemy!
Wolff Bachner: After the Muslim Brotherhood took control of the government in Egypt, despite their constant promises that they had no interest in holding political office or influencing Egypt’s elections, we began to see and hear a new expression used to describe their activities; Stealth Jihad. What is Stealth Jihad and how is the Muslim Brotherhood using this powerful new weapon to achieve their goals?
Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, you are obviously up to speed on your Islamic verbiage. Definitely, Stealth Jihad is a mandatory concept to master. So, in order to follow the winding, often unfamiliar terrain attributed to Islam’s thrust into the west, its essence must be adequately explored.
It revolves around the ability of dedicated Islamists to fly below the (communal/national) radar, but only until the Islamic community is strong enough – both politically, economically and otherwise – to emerge from the shadows. Operating out of full view affords anonymity, yet allows jihadists to build up as many war chests as possible. Two key components are monetary bases and hidden terror cells. They must be ready and prepared to spring into frontal action, if necessary. As a matter of record, staying burrowed for years is often a requirement. As is said, “hiding in plain sight” is more than a saying to Islamists. It is an actual method of jihad!
But if one example stands out among countless others, look no further than to a recent commentary, which commemorates the 12th memorial of 9/11/01. The DESECRATION of 9/11/01: Stealth Jihad” Via Mosques; Adnan Oktar’s Turkish-Islamic Union, Taqiyya”, Penetrates Into Jewish/Israeli Media/Power Centers – Where Is The Nexus? demonstrates the despicable and dangerous lengths the Muslim Brotherhood pursues to effectuate their agenda. The submission (Islam literally means “to submit”) of the west to Shariah Law, as described in just one of many YouTube interviews with Islamic leaders, is anything, but circumspect, despite their usage of Stealth Jihad.
So while the Muslim Brotherhood utilizes a mix of Stealth Jihad – in combination with “frontal/open jihad” – for this discussion, let us stick to what is less visible, than what is more readily apparent, that is, exploding body parts…..(read the rest here)
ON the one hand, frontal terror tactics are designed to instill a reflexive and immediate form of compliance. Therefore, when jihadi attacks explode within cities – NYC and Boston are just two examples – many become too terrified to speak out against the “religion of peace.” Speechless. See no Islamic evil, hear no Islamic evil…or “we will kill you”!
SIMILARLY, Charlie Hebdo-like assassinations – of those who dare to “defame” the “prophet” – are designed as particular warnings. In essence, a (heretofore) basic western underpinning, free speech, must cease and desist. Infidels, you got that?
REFLEXIVELY, western leaders, despite a pithy march of solidarity after the wholesale slaughter in Paris, reverted to self censorship. Even liberal-based Canada, in 2013, deemed that criticizing/parodying Islam’s wife beating “rules” was (still is) a non starter. Did you ever?
ON the other side of the spectrum, “soft/stealth jihad” is used in many insidious ways, chiefly, through interfaith “dialogue” and the Islamic process of da’wah. Moreover, a stepped up version is now in full force via the newly constituted Muslim-American political party, duly under the leadership of the Brotherhood Mafia!
REGARDLESS of their back door assaults, the fact of the matter is that the U.S. Constitution enshrines certain inalienable rights. Thus, one “accommodation” at a time, it is doubly egregious that the leadership of the free world has brought about this dire situation by silencing Americans.
SUCH is the case because Obama Inc.’s Department of Justice has effectively criminalized any discussion of Islam, regardless of anything else. How many know this?
AND it is through this (illegal) slippery slope that a parent (in New Hampshire) was arrested at a school board meeting, all for daring to question the school’s choice of reading assignments! Imagine that.
With the above in mind, it is hardly surprising that strong-arm tactics are being used against anyone who refuses to toe the radical left’s dictates or the increasingly emboldened thrusts by Islamists. Readers must internalize that one does not negate the other, in fact, they feed off of each other! Dracula-like. Hence, the constant reference to the red/green alliance.
Into this arena, along came a concerned father from the small state of New Hampshire (also a lawyer…having worked in the NYC Prosecutor’s office…not exactly a milieu which renders one squeamish nor aghast at heavy-handed actions) who became duly alarmed by a particular book assigned to his 14 year old daughter. Not unlike any responsible parent, he placed a call into the principal’s office. No one responded to his concerns. After several failed attempts, he attended a school board meeting to address the issue. Well and good – or so you would think.
Now, the fact that the book was written by a bestselling author is neither here nor there. But what does matter is the absolute graphic and sexual nature of this work of fiction, which in the “infinite wisdom” of leftist driven school officials is supposed to teach requisite lessons. It is “a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence”…..
STIPULATED, the subject matter was about inappropriate sexual and violent material and not about Islam. Nevertheless, the “thought police”, Gestapo-like (whether from the Islamist or leftist side), are never far behind, once citizens relinquish (without a fight) their Constitutional rights.
ATOP said anti-freedom infringement, is anyone shocked that a sports coach in Maine, at one of the oldest and toniest private schools in the nation, was “forced to resign” (essentially fired despite the so-called resignation) because he shared a negative Facebook post about Islam? Don’t be.
According to recent reports, a Conway, N.H., man was forced out of his position as a lacrosse coach at Fryeburg Academy after sharing an open letter to Barack Obama about the influence of Islam on the world. The letter has been circulating since 2009 and was reportedly written in response to a speech in which Obama declared Islam an integral part of America’s past.
Of course, Obama has made similar statement since then; and when Scott Lees received an email from a friend with the open letter attached, he felt it was relevant enough to share with his Facebook friends.
The letter as posted reads:
Dear Mr. Obama:
Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital?
Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?
Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?
Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?
Have you seen Muslims shak[ing] hands with Muslim Girl Scouts?
Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?
Have your seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the American way of life????
Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.
Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.
Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights? Didn’t think so.
Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England? No.
Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.” Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr. Obama?
Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.
Where were Muslims during this country’s Woman’s Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the ‘hajib’ or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women’s rights, aren’t they?
Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazis in killing Jews.
Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren’t flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East.
No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.
And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here in America…
Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslims.
And now we can add November 5, 2009 – the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major, a doctor and a psychiatrist, who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.
That, Mr. Obama is the “Muslim heritage” in America!
P.S. Now, you can add the Boston Marathon bombings, too…
THE above posting was not only fact-based, but the coach had every Constitutional right to share it, regardless whose feathers became ruffled. But no matter, even historical truth is no longer tolerated, if Islamists demand an omerta. Do you agree, or not, to these strictures on your freedoms?
AS is said in Israel, sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, whether in America or within other western nations, a major fissure exists. One faction believes that keeping ones head down, essentially, self censorship, will tame the Islamic beasts and satiate them for the interim.
NEVER gonna happen. Besides, blackmailers keep upping the ante, once paid. Same outcome on steroids.
INTRINSICALLY, passive westerners will either bow down to Islam, submit, or they will be eliminated. This is where it is at; whether in the Mid East, Africa, Europe, America et al. Ones locale makes no diff. The coinage is inevitable and mandated through Islamic doctrine.
Islamist insurgents have issued an ultimatum to northern Iraq’s dwindling Christian population to either convert to Islam, pay a religious levy or face death, according to a statement distributed in the militant-controlled city of Mosul.
The statement issued by the Islamic State, the al Qaeda offshoot which led last month’s lightning assault to capture swathes of north Iraq, and seen by Reuters, said the ruling would come into effect on Saturday.
It said Christians who wanted to remain in the “caliphate” that the Islamic State declared this month in parts of Iraq and Syria must agree to abide by terms of a “dhimma” contract – a historic practice under which non-Muslims were protected in Muslim lands in return for a special levy known as “jizya”.
“We offer them three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract – involving payment of jizya; if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword,” the announcement said…
HOWEVER, a divergent faction takes the polar opposite approach, refusing to cow and bow, instead, preferring to deal with their insatiable dictates head on. This is precisely why a growing backlash of non-compliant “dissenters” have taken up the struggle via the pen and otherwise. Educational sites, political commentary and satirical forums are examples of particular types of push back.
IN this regard, with an increasingly growing platform, this site will not comply, submit and agree to be silent. Hey, Islamists and fellow enablers, you got that?
MOST significantly, the question remains: which approach – based upon overwhelming empirical (educational) evidence – has the best chance to stop Islam’s enforcers at our (western) gates?
READERS, either take a stand or submit. The choice is yours. There is no middle ground.