Gun Control Madness & Its After Shocks…Directly Related To Students & Gun Stores Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

A recurrent blog theme deals with leftist madness, particularly as it impinges on the kiddies. And this is no small matter, whether they are 6 years old or 16.

Specifically, does it make sense to trust leaders who task domestic terrorists (as well as a man-boy devotee, designated as the “safe school’s czar”) to oversee the nation’s education curriculum, with anything, least of all ones children?- If the answer is a resounding negative, then surely the infected school system is rotten to its core.  

As as upshot, when it comes to gun control the left is out of control. Simple as that –…as they keep marching toward’s disarming legal gun owners –

Even more so, since the same leftist (mis)educators are in league with radical Demsters, has anyone bothered to ask them: Why was ObamaCare rammed through in the first place, even though a majority of Americans were up in arms? –

Which leads right back to the abysmal lack of judgment, emanating from those who educate America’s children!


Mar. 2, 2013

A Florida high school student wrestled a loaded gun away from another teen on the bus ride home this week and was slapped with a suspension in return.

The 16-year-old Cypress Lake High student in Fort Myers, Fla. told WFTX-TV there was “no doubt” he saved a life after grappling for the loaded .22 caliber revolver being aimed point-blank at another student on Tuesday.

“I think he was really going to shoot him right then and there,” said the suspended student, not identified by WFTX because of safety concerns. “Not taking no pity.”

The student said the suspect, a football player, threatened to shoot a teammate because he had been arguing with his friend.

Authorities confirmed to WFTX the weapon was indeed loaded, and the arrest report stated the suspect, identified by WVZN-TV as Quadryle Davis, was “pointing the gun directly” at the other student and “threatening to shoot him.”

That’s when, the teen told the station, he and two others tackled the suspect and wrestled the gun away. The next day, all three were suspended.

“How they going to suspend me for doing the right thing?” he asked.

The school’s referral slip said he was given an “emergency suspension” for being involved in an “incident” with a weapon. Lee County School District spokesman Alberto Rodriguez said in a statement that “If there is a potentially dangerous situation, Florida law allows the principal to suspend a student immediately pending a hearing.”

“Those kids had to fight for their lives,” the mother of the suspended teen said. “All the kids that was involved in this they should have a pat on their backs because they did the right thing to save someone from burying their child.”

The suspended teen is allowed to go back to school Monday.

Meanwhile, the student accused of pointing the weapon has been charged only with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon “without intent” to kill.

The sheriff’s office said the investigation is ongoing and that the charges are “based on our findings at this time.”

Yet as worrisome as the above is, there is some good news, at least coming from those who refuse to be cowed and bowed. 


High-capacity gun magazines airlifted to ‘freedom-loving’ Americans

A gun-magazine company in Boulder, Colo., has announced a campaign based on the Berlin Airlift to help Coloradoans “trapped inside occupied territory” to purchase large-capacity magazines before the Legislature passes a series of gun-control bills next week.

Magpul Industries manufactures magazines and other gun accessories for private, law-enforcement and military use. WND recently reported on how the company may be forced to relocate if the Democrat-controlled Legislature moves forward with plans to ban high capacity magazines, which is one of the company’s key products.

Following the president’s lead on the firearms issue, Democrats in the House passed a series of gun-control bills that the Obama administration has said would help them pass similar measures in other states.

Vice President Joe Biden “said it would send a strong message to the rest of the country that a western state had passed gun-control bills,” Tony Exhum, a Democrat lawmaker from Colorado Springs, told the Denver Post.

The series of bills included:

  • H.B. 1224, which would bans all magazines that hold more than 15 rounds.
  • H.B. 1226 would prohibit those with concealed carry permits, including off-duty police officers and former military personnel, from bringing their weapons on college campuses.
  • H.B. 1228 would force residents to pay for exercising a constitutional right by making them pay for a background check to prove they are not criminals. There is no limit on the amount the Colorado Bureau of Investigation could charge for the background check.
  • H.B. 1229 bans the private sale and transfer of firearms and institutes universal background checks and/gun registration for all Colorado gun owners.

In addition to the four house bills, on Monday the Senate Judiciary Committee will also conduct hearings on two additional bills.

  • S.B. 195 prohibits citizens in Colorado from taking online concealed carry training courses.
  • S.B. 196, which bans “assault” weapons sales in the state.

With Democrats in charge of the governorship and both state houses, the measures are expected to pass.

In anticipation of the magazine ban, Magpul has announced a project it calls the “Boulder Airlift” in its latest newsletter. The company said the project imitates the Berlin Airlift, which flew in supplies to West Berlin after the Soviets prevented the city from getting needed provisions in the days following World War II.

“Similar to the Berlin Airlift, the Boulder Airlift will bring much-needed supplies to freedom-loving residents trapped inside occupied territory,” the letter said. “While we plan to initially use FedEx or UPS instead of aerial delivery, we figure that $5 flat rate shipping will make up for any loss of ‘style points.’”

It goes on to explain the company is permitting Colorado residents to create a special account to purchase magazines prior to the ban.

“If the pending state legislation limiting sales and transfers of standard capacity magazines does pass, we will not be the only ones affected; Colorado residents’ right to purchase and transfer standard capacity magazines will be infringed in the near future,” the newsletter said. “With that in mind, we are beginning a program to help as many residents of our home state as we can, while we still can. To meet this need, we have set up a process for CO residents to purchase limited quantities of magazines from our website.”

The company is selling Colorado residents high-capacity magazines at bargain basement prices. The price for a 30-round magazine for an AR-15 is $12.95 with other magazines for MAK-90 7.62 rounds selling for $19.95. At stores, many of the same magazines are currently being sold for upwards of $50.

The company has warned lawmakers that if the magazine ban passes, they will be forced to relocate to another state.

“If we’re able to stay in Colorado and manufacture a product, but law-abiding citizens of the state were unable to purchase the product, customers around the state and the nation would boycott us for remaining here,” said Doug Smith, chief operating officer for Magpul Industries. “Staying here would hurt our business.”

Democrat Rep. Daniel Kagan said Magpul just doesn’t understand what the law says.

“Manufacturers will be able to still sell and transfer these high-capacity magazines to individuals in other states, the U.S. military and law enforcement,” Kagan told the Post. “We want [Magpul] to stay here in Colorado. It would be sad to see them leave.”

Dudley Brown, president of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and executive director of the National Association of Gun Rights, said Democrats will be engaging in political suicide if they continue with their plans to ban products produced by Magpul and strip away the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

“Gun owners are coming out of the woodwork right now to fight the battle,” Brown said. “What they are doing to us now in the legislature, we get to do to them in the next election, and we’re not going to play nice, either. We know how to play hardball, and we’re really going to play hardball this year.”

Weld County Sheriff John Cooke said he applauds Magpul’s efforts to help the state’s residents.

“I think their project is great. They recognize the unfair limitations that legislatures are putting on Colorado residents when none of the other surrounding states have a magazine ban. Magpul being a Colorado company, at least for now, is performing a great service. This is a great thing for the people of Colorado.”

Cooke said the magazine ban makes no sense, and he noted that his department has never had a situation that involved criminals using high-capacity magazines.

The sheriff has been an outspoken advocate for the Second Amendment during his time in office. Recently he declared his office had no intention to enforce any of Obama’s executive orders on gun control.

“I’m not going to help him in any way,” Cooke said. “I’m not going to enforce it because it’s unenforceable and because I don’t have the resources. The federal government doesn’t have the resources.”

Critics have said Cooke does not have the right to choose which laws to enforce; however, the sheriff brushes aside the concerns, accusing critics of having a double standard.

“Obama has refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. He has also chosen not to enforce our immigration laws. I find it interesting that these critics have no problem with that. Why should I be held to a different standard than the president?”

Cooke noted that the company has always been known for fair prices.

“They’ve always been really reasonable in the prices they charge. This program will help the law-abiding citizens of Colorado purchase a legal product that can help them with self-defense in these last few days before the Democrats decide to prohibit their sale.”

Valiant Americans, whether business owners or regular folks, take deep umbrage at the infringement of power hungry leaders, as they tread on their capitalist domain and their Second Amendment rights. The sentiment is the same: don’t DARE stomp on America’s liberties! Thus, taking care of business is the only way forward –

Rock on!

EXPLOSIVE – “DHS Insider” Reveals…Congressman Louie Gohmert Too…Disarming Americans (Gun Control) Empowers the Red/Green Alliance;Sharia Law Its Beneficiary…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Hardly a violent person, but no nonsense too. These traits are not mutually exclusive. One can be as gentle as a lamb with those one holds dear, but fight like a tiger against those seeking to do harm. In fact, both concepts complement each other. The yin and yang.

As such, it often takes a slap (or two…or three…) upside the head, to arose the dreamy-eyed among us. All for a good cause. They are living in self imposed (mental) slumbers. Besides,they have no moral right to bring the rest of us down into the depths of their delusions, however unintentionally.

This is decidedly the case when it comes to average Americans (westerners) who are not hard core leftist devotees, but seek to take the neutral way out of an inherently life changing struggle. The “on the fence” attitude ain’t gonna fly. Like it or not, the “red/green” alliance will drag all of us along with their program (albeit kicking and screaming, or worse), via the disarming of Americans, and the empowering of their mutual anti-American forces.

Let average folks face facts: gun control is not about protecting Americans, or  their nauseating mantra – the protection of the kiddies. For heaven’s sake, disarming Americans (one gun edict after another, until the Second Amendment is shredded) will aid criminals, those who always gain access to weapons; anti-Americans, including socialists, domestic terrorists and anarchists; and most tellingly, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, fully embedded in America and its power centers. As to protecting the innocent, never gonna happen, at least if the gun control enthusiasts get their way.

The issue is multi-faceted, but very clear in its intent, as adequately gleaned within. Yet who would imagine, that an attempt to overhaul America’s free market health care would become a (hidden) vehicle for disarming Americans –  Regardless, the main players, pushing for disarming Americans, are nothing short of shock troops. They are willing to do anything to grab your (legal) guns – Hardly trustworthy sorts, especially with the safety of loved ones. NOT in this lifetime.

Yet, where does Sharia Law enthusiasts come into play, especially in connection to the revolutionary left’s all out push for gun control? Where don’t they! – To make matters even more insidious, the Islamist-in-Chief is full throttle in the mix. Literally – Familial roots and all – … and the nexus is very clear.

Therefore, one of the few in Congress, who stands shoulder to shoulder with Representative Michele Bachmann, re the looming threat from Sharia Law, courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, issues this stark, dark warning:

‘Audio: Rep. Louie Gohmert suggests Gun Rights needed to protect against Sharia Law’ – embedded audio

by  on FEBRUARY 22, 2013
There are some politicians who do things that make you wonder if they’re not actively working with America’s Islamic enemies; there are a few who definitely understand the threat and are actively standing against it. Rep. Louie Gohmert is one who truly understands that threat and while on a conservative radio program, seemed to imply that Americans need to fight for the second amendment to protect – at least in part – themselves from those who want to impose Sharia law. It’s truly a shame that more politicians aren’t standing with Gohmert because there are, indeed, far too many standing against him who are either actively pushing sharia law or are doing it through dhimmitude.”

Here’s another example of Congress “hard at work”, and their general ineptitude, pretending that they’re doing something to keep Americans safer – . You got that?

But don’t think that the Feds are going to have the last word, at least when it comes to those who truly value their freedom – A struggle that must happen. There is no other choice.

IF patriots require firmer evidence, as to the ensuing clash, look no further than “DHS Insider”, a trusted source of Northeast Intelligence Network. Lee Kaplan’s address too, as its Communications Director – And if “full circle” means anything, this blog’s connection to the above investigative journalist is rock solid –…so much so it is mentioned out of the gate.

‘Obama’s “Cyber-warriors” caught in gun control action’

Northeast Intelligence Network

“DHS Insider” information proven accurate By Douglas J. Hagmann 25 February 2013: We initially disclosed the existence of Obama’s “cyber-warriors” in an article published on 6 February 2013 under the title DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber-warriors & preparing for collapse. Today, a Texas lawmaker has reportedly caught Obama’s cyber-warriors in action, using fraudulent Twitter accounts to sway the gun control argument. According to Rep. Steve Stockman, Obama is using fictitious Twitter accounts to make it appear that there is more public support for gun control than really exists. Rep. Stockman analyzed 16 Twitter messages he received favoring Obama’s gun control initiative, finding that 10 out of the 16 were from accounts or people that don’t exist. They are fake accounts, or computer generated spambots, according to Mr. Stockman. Recent contact with my DHS insider verified that all social media is being heavily infiltrated by full-time workers under Obama’s “Cyber-Warriors for Obama” project that began on January 23, 2013, just two days after his inauguration. According to this insider, over 3,500 people are working to infiltrate various news and political sites on the internet. Their intent is to disrupt, divert topics, marginalize political opponents of Obama, and control as much public sentiment in favor of Obama as possible. “It’s a propaganda  campaign that would make Joseph Goebbels jealous. ” This is merely the start. Expect more,” stated this insider. …can’t stress enough to the readers…click on the Feb 6 embedded link, ‘DHS Insider: Obama’s Cyber Warriors & Preparing For Collapse’…then pass it forward!

Adding to the danger, the following report is the proof of the pudding, or the confiscation underway, evidenced in ‘See Police Confiscate Guns From Americans’ ! – The video links are beyond shocking…pass them on too!

And not known to shy away from straight shooting, along comes Sarah – the Conservative rock star – Palin, mostly known for her VP run, but also for her on target usage of the phrase, “putting lipstick on a pig”. Pushing aside a stroll down electoral lane, the readers will likely be interested in her take on the regime’s plans.

The former Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential nominee believes the federal government is “stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

Palin says the feds are afraid of what might happen if the sequester goes into effect.

She writes on her Facebook page: “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

The sequester will trigger $85 billion in immediate cuts to federal funding and $1.2 over 10 years unless lawmakers reach a deal by Friday.

The prospect of civil unrest puts a chilling spin on an off-teleprompter remark then-candidate Barack Obama made in a Colorado campaign speech in July, 2008.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” said candidate Obama.

Palin’s warning echoes a WND report Feb. 17 citing radio host Mark Levin’s point that federal non-military agencies have purchased enough ammunition recently not only to shoot every American five times but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war…….”

Most significantly, let’s not lose sight of Representative Gohmert’s warnings (via all the info overload), and the above is not his maiden attempt to alert fellow Americans –

Yet it behooves patriots, inside and outside Washington, to SCREAM from the roof tops, as many times as it takes, to hammer the messages home. “Going for broke” describes Washington’s radical thugs, as they plan to disarm lawful Americans, just as the nation LITERALLY goes broke!

Choice verbiage often serves as a visual aid, thereby, its raw meaning is visible. No hiding in plain sight. Thus, Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s administration has an absolute goal post – the evisceration of the Second Amendment. Consequently, Sharia Law proponents will also become empowered. Patriots – not so much. That’s the plan.

Once again, the Brotherhood Mafia is in league with the radical left. A devil’s bargain. A marriage made in anti-American hell. Western civilization dangling off a cliff. Yes, it is.

Leftist Mendacity…Gunning For The Second Amendment…The Gutting Of The Constitution…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Protection for me but not for thee. Guns for me but not for thee. So sayeth the leftist brayers in America’s midst. Elsewhere too. And if one needs demonstrable proofs to support said thesis (of leftist mendacity), where oh where does a patriot begin? Here and there.

“Going postal” has taken on ever more sinister meaning, as the Radical-in-Chief leads (with his obnoxiously familiar head tilt, nose in the air, feigning he is above the fray, that he isn’t forward marching his leftist troops…and pigs do fly) his fellow revolutionaries into highly dangerous territory. Deadly.Thereby, creating a palpable environment for gun control advocates to threaten to kill legal gun owners – . Does it get any more twisted than that? Nope. An American leadership gone haywire.

If the above doesn’t send chills up and down your spine, imagine what drove a dedicated U.S. Marine to upbraid Sen. Feinstein (and fellow anti-Constitutional “lawmakers”) to the tune of an open letter – . A travesty. A tragedy in the making.

But what does one expect, when a rogue leadership fiddles with the Constitution, with the intent to install Barack HUSSEIN Obama as “President for Life” – .This American-Israeli blogger is dead serious.

In this regard, welcome to “Obama’s America” – …. a land of tyranny. Diametrically opposed to its founding principles – the “land of the free, the home of the brave”.

Alas, leftist dogma is the same world over – … a mortal danger – a dagger to its heart – to western civilization.

Therefore, the latest is a manifestation, a mandatory push back, against a tyrannical regime


‘We think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs’

A spokesman for a foundation that successfully has battled in court to uphold the Constitution’s Second Amendment is challenging not only politicians but celebrities who think the American public should be disarmed to go without their own firearms protections.

“That would include Joe Biden’s shotguns,” said Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, “and the armed security now enjoyed by Sens. Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.”

He said such leading opponents of gun ownership should begin the process and “lead by example” through repudiation of any of their own firearms as well as the “armed security” they now have.

“It seems clear from the direction the administration is going that it wants to severely restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners to purchase the firearms of their choice,” Gottlieb said, “and we think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs by giving up their firearms and security first.”

The issue is in the headlines right now because anti-gun politicians including President Obama are trying to capitalize on the horror following the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., that left 20 children and six adults victims.

The alleged gunman shot and killed himself, so there may be questions about the attack that never are answered.

An argument for armed self-defense, in “America Fights Back: Armed Self-Defense in a Violent Age.”

Nevertheless, Obama has appointed Vice President Joe Biden to head up a task force and make recommendations on more gun controls for the United States.

But Obama should be a leader in another area, Gottlieb said, that of relinquishing firearms and protection from firearms.

“It would especially apply to President Obama,” he said, “who just signed legislation giving himself Secret Service protection for life, at the expense of taxpayers he wants to disarm.”

He said the same standard is appropriate for “anti-gun celebrities who have bodyguards while supporting legislation that would deprive average citizens from owning firearms for personal protection.”

There is good that comes from Americans’ access to weaponry, he pointed out.

“For example,” he noted, “when I appeared with CNN’s Piers Morgan recently, he asserted that nobody needs an AR-15. The other day near Houston, a Texas teenager used an AR-15 to defend himself and his 12-year-old sister from a home invasion by shooting two burglars. Piers can choke on that.”

Gottlieb believes that public figures simply don’t have a right to advocate for gun bans for private citizens unless they first voluntarily give up their personal security.

“These anti-gun politicians were not elected to positions of royalty,” Gottlieb said. “They are citizens, with no more rights than any other citizen. They were elected to serve the public, not treat the public like serfs. If they want us to put our safety at risk, they should drop the pretense and give up their guns and guards before daring to suggest that anyone else do the same.”

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

It fought and won the landmark McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case that applied Second Amendment rights to individuals in states all across the nation.

The organization earlier called out the hypocrisy of mayors across the nation who advocate for gun control.

It took a look at New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan called Mayors Against Illegal Guns that is to enhance gun restrictions on citizens city by city.

SAF officials said perhaps he should be focusing on the mayors themselves, not the residents of their cities.

“Michael Bloomberg created this group to further his personal agenda of public disarmament,” Gottlieb said at the time. “But within the ranks of his organization, our research has found several politicians who have been convicted of various serious crimes, thus making it impossible for them to finish their terms.

“We discovered,” he said, “one mayor convicted of perjury and embezzlement, another who was convicted of attempted child molestation, and yet another who was convicted of assault and racketeering. There was one who was convicted on bribery, fraud and money laundering, and another who was convicted of domestic violence.

“In short,” Gottlieb said, “many of these elitist politicians can no longer own firearms. The crimes they were convicted of suggest they are public enemies rather than public servants. No wonder they want to take guns from law-abiding citizens!

“Perhaps Bloomberg should worry about background checks on his colleagues, rather than law-abiding gun owners,” he suggested.

The group boasts that it has grown to more than 725 mayors in 40 states. But SAF is publicizing mayors who have run into their own troubles.

It is launching its campaign in newspapers, magazines and on the Internet, revealing the criminal and ethical wrongdoings of many of the mayors themselves.

See the ad.

Gottlieb reported the research conducted by the foundation found “a far higher rate of criminal activity within the ranks of the MAIG than among the ranks of more than eight million citizens who are licensed to carry concealed firearms in 49 states.”

Another recent battle for the SAF was in Alameda County, Calif., which changed the rules as three businessmen were trying to open a gun shop. The foundation successfully sued the county for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of three businessmen by wrongfully denying them permits to open a gun shop.

The foundation also recently argued a pair of California cities and the state’s Department of Justice improperly confiscated firearms during investigations and then refused to return them to their owners – even after the subjects of the inquiries were cleared.
Other cases the SAF has handled in recent months:

  • SAF sued the state of California over a “vague” gun ban over a case in which a man twice was jailed and then cleared. The focal point is the definition of an “assault weapon.” The statute’s definition of weapons is so “vague and ambiguous,” the group contends, that one man was arrested on two different occasions for violations but ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing. “It’s an insult to be arrested once for violating a law that is so vague and ambiguous that law enforcement officers cannot tell the difference between what is and what is not a legal firearm under this statute,” said Gottlieb, “but to be arrested and jailed twice for the same offense is an outrage.”
  • In New York, the organization has asked for a summary judgment that would strike New York City’s $340 triennial fee for just owning a handgun. The legal brief explains that under U.S. Supreme Court rulings “the right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense is a part of the ‘core’ of the Second Amendment’s protections.” The case, brought by SAF, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association and individuals including an electrical contractor, a paramedic, CPA and woodworker, argues, “The city’s $340 fee is inherently prohibitive and serves the impermissible purpose of discouraging the exercise of constitutional rights. While the city can charge a nominal fee to defray costs, the $340 fee is not nominal, and has never been calculated to defray costs.”
  • The organization has sued New Jersey and officials and judges over procedures that allowed them to refuse firearms permits for a kidnap victim, a man who carries large amounts of cash for his business and a civilian FBI employee who fears attacks from radical Islamists. The permissions were denied on the grounds people had not shown a “justifiable need.” “Law-abiding New Jersey citizens have been arbitrarily deprived of their ability to defend themselves and their families for years under the state’s horribly crafted laws,” said an SAF spokesman. “The law grants uncontrolled discretion to police chiefs and other public officials to deny license applications even in cases where the applicant has shown a clear and present danger exists.”
  • The SAF filed a case on behalf of an honorably discharged veteran from the Vietnam War and names as defendants Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of Jefferson Wayne Schrader. The question is whether the state of Maryland can deprive an individual of the right to possess a weapon over a misdemeanor. Schrader had been convicted of misdemeanor assault relating to a fight involving a man who previously had assaulted him in Annapolis. But he was denied the opportunity to receive a shotgun as a gift or to purchase a handgun for personal protection.
  • SAF filed a claim against Maryland for a man who alleged the state was violating the Second Amendment by refusing to renew his handgun permit. Raymond Woollard originally was issued a carry permit after a man broke into his home during a family event in 2002. Woollard’s permit was renewed in 2005 after the defendant in the case was released from prison. But state officials later refused to renew the permit, even though the intruder now lives some three miles from Woollard.
  • SAF sued Westchester County, N.Y., because officials there were requiring that residents have a “good cause” to ask for a handgun permit. The federal lawsuit alleges the requirement conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment establishes a personal right to “keep and bear arms.” Individual plaintiffs in the case are Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov, both Westchester County residents whose permit applications were denied.”

The left’s game plan is relentless, boundless and without remorse. But whether they honed their skills, aka “made their bones”, on Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” –  is neither here nor there. What matters are the results of their misdeeds, deadly in their scope.

Due to the above – and so much more – patriots are as much at war with the die-hard left, as they are with the Islamists at their throats.

As is said, “forewarned is forearmed” – literally!