Northeast Intelligence Network Posits A DIRECT Nexus Between The POTUS, Saudi Arabia & The Muslim Brotherhood Mafia: Infers A PURPOSEFUL Precursor To WWW 3… Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This blogger is in constant contact with certain ‘ears to the ground’, both in the U.S. and Israel. Thus, most of the information referring to Middle East developments, contained herein, is culled from said exchanges. Of course, supporting said conclusions includes link-backs to well respected investigative journalists. One never cites who said what…or this or that, but the message gets out.

That being said, one of the better informed investigators on the scene is Doug Hagmann, Director of Northeast Intelligence Network. Recall this blog’s previous commentaries, and then Hagmann’s latest assessment will eventually come full circle. 

The Islamist-in-Chief indeed has irrefutable Wahhabi/Saudi roots – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/and all his (eventual) protestations aside will not amount to a hill of beans.

And every alarm bell should be ringing, not only tying Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, but Huma Abedin, Deputy COS to gal pal Hillary, also a top Brotherhood operative –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/27/every-alarm-bell-is-ringing-tying-barack-hussein-obama-to-the-muslim-brotherhood-huma-abedin-at-the-tippy-top-eye-popping-video-embedded-addendum-to-when-does-trucking-with-terrorists-brea/.

So, is it any leap of faith to question: why did the POTUS help install Prez Morsi  (a leading figure in the Brotherhood), through his upending of Hosni Mubarak – GO NOW ?  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/12/the-islamist-in-chief-helped-install-morsi-the-muslim-brotherhoods-point-man-for-egypt-1-1-2-addendum-to-white-house-mandates-aid-to-morsi-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/It shouldn’t be.

Now, isn’t it interesting to note, the Islamist-in-Chief is championing continuous aid to Egypt, even though Congress said – not so fast. Why is this? Isn’t prudence in order? https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/30/white-house-mandates-aid-to-morsis-islamist-egypt-in-the-best-interests-of-the-u-s-addendum-to-coming-full-circle-the-planned-empowerment-of-the-muslim-mafia-commentary-by-adina-kutnick/.

In conjunction, the POTUS’s seemingly inexplicable reaction – the video made them do it – to U.S. assassinations in Libya, lends itself to further probings. What part did the State Department play in Bengazigate, under the POTUS’s orders, and most especially, where do Huma’s guiding hands lead?  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/18/hillary-takes-the-fall-for-the-potus-in-bengazigate-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-shining-the-spotlight-on-huma-abedin-addendum-to-uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-spear-the-house-of-al-sa/. Americans demand to know.

Therefore, pay strict attention to the underlying thesis posited by the above commentaries, as well as Doug Hagmann’s following analysis – little that is roiling the Middle East, and setting it ablaze, is taking place without Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fingerprints.This is precisely why he is often referred to as the Pyromaniac-in-Chief; as he sets one fire after another, expecting to install his Muslim Brotherhood Mafia in all the upended regimes.

And, as much as he doesn’t angst about WMD’s in the mullahs hands, his goal in Syria is to ‘level’ the playing field; prying the Alawite’s stranglehold loose in Syria, replacing them with a Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda front.

In actuality, per U.S./western interests, the dangers are the same – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/31/islamists-whatever-their-stripes-are-bloodthirsty-assads-butchers-his-opponents-too-six-of-onehalf-dozen-of-another-addendum-toislam-blood-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. BOTH Iran/Assad’s regime, or a Brotherhood installed replacement, are equally lethal. The only difference being, one has the power of the leadership of the free world behind it!

‘Obama: Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood operative?’

Death Race Damascus: “13 days in October”

Author
– Doug Hagmann   Tuesday, October 23, 2012

“How will our great-grandchildren’s history books recount the events leading up to World War III and the great culling of the earth’s population that resulted? While I hope that this question never has to be answered, it is with that level of urgency that I write this report. First, I believe some historical context will be beneficial for an accurate understanding of our current situation.

Some might be old enough to recall the Cuban missile crisis with clarity and context. Others know it only through history books and verbal accounts from older family members and friends. While accounts may vary by perspective, the one constant on which everyone seems to agree is that we were on the brink of nuclear war with the Soviet Union during those “13 days in October” in 1962.  If things would have gone differently, historians estimate that up to a quarter of a billion people could have been killed by a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the USSR.Cuban Missile Crisis redux

If one truly understands what is taking place on the world stage as I write this, then it is eerily appropriate that we mark the 50th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis this month. We are, in fact, directly in the middle of those 13 days in October, 1962, and perhaps directly in the middle of the present day crisis. The path that the U.S. takes in the most immediate future could likely decide the fate of humanity. It’s that serious, yet unlike the very visible events of 1962, most people today are blissfully unaware how close we stand at the precipice of global war.

Although a nuclear armed Iran is indeed a threat to the security of the world, it is less imminent than the currently evolving threat that is forming elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa. Yet, our attention continues to be deliberately diverted to Iran from other areas where we are covertly involved. It is here that the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 finds additional relevance when we recall the covert attempts to overthrow the Castro regime in Cuba in the years leading up to the actual crisis.Iran: a deliberate diversion

For better or worse, our own CIA was involved in numerous covert operations to overthrow Castro after he took power in Cuba. The most visible and well known of these attempts was, of course, the Bay of Pigs operation that went awry in 1961 during the administration of John F. Kennedy. It can be rationally and reasonably argued that we had a lot at stake here due to the close proximity of Cuba to the U.S. mainland.

Following the failure of the CIA backed mission, former President Eisenhower told President Kennedy that “the failure of the Bay of Pigs will embolden the Soviets to do something that they would otherwise not do.” It was because of the failure of the clandestine actions of the U.S. that the Soviet Union indeed became emboldened and set out to position nuclear missiles just 90 miles off of the coast of Florida.

Although Obama is no Kennedy, Putin is no Khrushchev, and the Russians are not advancing their political agenda in this instance, the template is otherwise eerily similar. In 1962, Cuba was America’s “red line” as the Soviets were exporting their agenda to the West. Today, Syria is Russia’s “red line” that this administration is intent on crossing.  In Syria, the Mediterranean port of Tartus is the location of Russia’s only remaining naval base and sea port outside of their country. Accordingly, it is of significant strategic importance to Russia.

The port, as well as the stability of Syria is of critical security to Russia, not only from a defensive perspective, but also for the free flow of oil and gas to and from Russia. Turkey buys up to 80% of its natural gas from Russia, making that country Russia’s second largest client. Turkey’s role as an oil and energy supplier is predicated on the free flow of oil and gas from Russia and Iran. The status of relations are now being changed by external influences, namely the United States via the Obama-Muslim Brotherhood alliance and Saudi Arabia. Today, the Syrian Ambassador to Tehran stated that Turkey, in collusion with others, is attempting to revive the Ottoman Empire.

It is for this reason that Russia has upwards of 100,000 “advisors” in Syria. Despite their presence and warnings from Russia, we have been actively arming the anti-Assad rebels so that the Assad regime can be overthrown and replaced by a government sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Putin has directly and indirectly warned Obama not to meddle in Syria or risk direct conflict with Russia. Despite such warnings, Obama has continued his foreign policy of using al Qaeda backed rebels, supported by the Muslim Brotherhood, to install leaders affiliated with the Saudi-backed Muslim Brotherhood in Syria. Why would Obama place billions of people in jeopardy in a world war by his attempts to reshape the Middle East? What is pushing this agenda?

The Obama-Clinton deception

Despite the claims of many right-wing politicians and conservative media pundits, it is not a failure of foreign policy, but because of the Obama foreign policy that we find ourselves at the precipice of World War III. More importantly, though, the Obama administration and his spokespeople are deliberately misrepresenting the events that occurred in Libya to cover-up a clandestine operation that encompasses the entirety of the so-called Arab Spring. Libya is the Obama CIA’s weapons hub for the region. It is where the weapons are being collected and shipped for use in Syria, to topple the Assad regime.

Unlike the more palatable and readily acceptable goals of the government backed operations a half-century ago (i.e. fighting the expansion of communism), the goals of this administration reveal something entirely different. It is through this prism of understanding that all of the most recent historically significant events begin to make sense. Could answers to such basic questions concerning the background and meteoric rise of Obama, his relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, his deep bow to the Saudi King be found in Benghazi? Might this covert agenda, if exposed, reveal that we are actually engaged in a proxy war with Russia on behalf of Saudi Arabia?

The above certainly sounds more plausible than the reason offered by Obama and his representatives to date, and also seems to be a more viable reason that this administration has gone to such great lengths to hide the truth from the American public.

Bay of Benghazi?

As I first detailed in my two previous reports, Lemmings at the Precipice of WWIII and Body of lies, from Barack to Benghazi, Barack Hussein Obama, it is becoming more apparent that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was involved in a CIA operation of the same magnitude as the Bay of Pigs, just not yet as visible. The actual story, however, is even bigger and even more deeply rooted in the “Obama agenda.” Ambassador Stevens is simply the most visible face of this covert CIA operation.

Based on my research and investigation, in addition to much assistance from a confidential source well-connected to the intelligence community, it is becoming clear Stevens was the “go-to” man on the ground for providing assistance to the “rebels” in Syria who are attempting to topple the Assad regime. This is the reason that he was at a CIA operational post in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 and not Tripoli, where the U.S. Embassy is located.

It appears that Stevens was working for the CIA under the direction of the Clinton State Department and the Obama administration to facilitate the transfer of weapons, including portable surface to air missiles from Libya to the rebels or freedom fighters in Syria. It is now being revealed that the weapons “confiscated” in Libya were being moved by the ton from Benghazi to outposts in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan for their eventual use by anti-Assad rebels. Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood play a role in the weapons distribution, while the “freight” is paid by Turkey, Qatar and most importantly, Saudi Arabia.

The amount of weapons is staggering. It is estimated that within the last year, between 30-40 million pounds of weapons were transported out of Libya. Considering that the U.S. and the intelligence agencies have had 24/7 surveillance over every inch of Libya, can anyone of reasonable sensibilities really contend that the U.S. was not aware of exactly who was smuggling weapons from Libya, if not directly involved in that activity?

Much like the Bay of Pigs, the CIA, under the direction of Obama, is deeply determined and extensively involved in overthrowing the Assad regime. Here we come back to the question of why? Is it for humanitarian purposes to free an oppressed people? No.

Body of lies and diversions

There are many lies being perpetuated by Obama, the Clinton State Department and even a complying and complicit media. There are also distractions being forced on the American public so that the truth can remain hidden, at least until certain objectives are accomplished. The most ludicrous of lies is blaming an obscure internet video for the attacks in Benghazi. Although that has been sufficiently debunked, all of the lies should be addressed one more time.

The initial “official” response to the Benghazi attack was to place blame on the video The Innocence of Muslims, and by asserting that the attack was the product of a spontaneous protest in Benghazi. The nature of the attack proves otherwise, and the adherence to that story is now exposing the foreknowledge and complicity of those parroting that account. The attack was preplanned, was directed at a CIA operational post which was looted of all documents and materials before being destroyed by the attackers. Simply put, it was a professional “hit.”

The issue of the “security failures” is also a bit of a lie. True, a security problem existed in Tripoli, not Benghazi, where “official” personnel were deliberately kept at a minimum to maintain operational security. To divert discussion to the issue of security of our diplomatic personnel is to intentionally divert attention away from the events taking place in Benghazi.

Furthermore, the brave men who died in the attacks were not part of Steven’s security detail. They were working under the direction of the State Department, ostensibly for the purpose of searching and destroying weapons left by the deposed Qaddafi. Based on information provided to me, they were collecting all of the working weapons, transporting those to Benghazi for transport to Derna, where they were to be shipped to locations in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. The display of weapons being destroyed by these contractors in Libya was pure theater, as those were non-functional.

Additionally, there was never any kidnapping plot as part of an October surprise. So, what’s the larger picture?

Western media AWOL on arrests

Few Americans realize that two suspects in the murder of Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans were arrested in Istanbul, Turkey more than two weeks ago. Where is the U.S. media on this story?

Perhaps the media is absent because their arrest might lead to some very embarrassing facts. According to my intelligence source, the key leaders of the attack were speaking a foreign language identified as Persian.  According to this intelligence source, the known escape route from Libya by foreign operatives would be through Turkey, into Syria and out to Iran, which is the exact route taken and intended.  Identified as citizens of Tunisia, they were reportedly carrying false passports and spoke with a false accent, which was the initial reason they were detained. Further investigation, however, linked the two men to the attacks in Benghazi.

Are we not beginning to detect a pattern here?

Obama: Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood operative?

At this point, take a few steps back and review the complete picture. Many astute people continue to search for answers about Barack Hussein Obama – from his origins to his current agenda. One provides answers for the other. Motive, means and opportunity are an investigator’s trifecta for matching a crime with a suspect.

Despite his claims of transparency and after four years of holding the highest position in the free world, there continue to be a number of unanswered questions surrounding Obama’s past. His sudden rise from obscurity, his trip to Pakistan, his mother’s work in Indonesia, his step-father’s Muslim roots… there is a seemingly unending list of “coincidences” and curiosities surrounding Obama. Too many to include here, yet too important not to note.

The relationship between Obama and Saudi Arabia is not exclusive to this administration, however, and could very well be considered a continuity of agenda of certain previous administrations. The Bush administration is one example. Consider that the September 11, 2001 attacks happened on his watch. Out of nineteen reported hijackers, fifteen were Saudi nationals and money used for the attacks was traced to Saudi Arabia. Despite these facts, many prominent members from Saudi Arabia living or present in the U.S. were given the “royal treatment” in the week of the attacks, and were allowed to fly, without questioning, out of the U.S. This fact alone still angers many intelligence officials.

Is it possible that Obama represents a new but well planned chapter in U.S. and Saudi relations? Could it be that Obama was groomed and financed by the Saudis for just this moment in time? Is this all part of a larger, globalist plan that transcends political parties in the West and creates interesting alliances across the globe?

So many unanswered questions, yet few seem to be asking anything. Meanwhile, the entire Middle East has been set afire, a new Ottoman empire or Islamic Caliphate is being constructed, and the continued course of action by Obama will likely result in the crossing of the red line, quickly ushering in World War III.”

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50490 – here too – http://www.shoebat.com/2012/10/23/gaffney-did-benghazi-gate-involve-gun-walking-to-al-qaeda/

Keep in mind, commentaries within this blog are always backed up by layers of well informed analysis. Thus, peeling back Hagmann’s information is to peer into this blog’s looking glass; a treasure trove of information developed since 9/11/01, courtesy of several “helping hands”.

It goes without saying, this site is savvy enough to know when certain elements are out of its depth, thus, staying clear of such minefields. After all, who needs any more drama, especially when living in the hotter than hot Middle East.

NOT this blogger.

It is always gratifying to find oneself in reliable, respectable and qualified company.

Enough said.

What Happens When Degenerates Hold The Reins Of Power…Whether In America Or Israel? The Twinning Pathology of Barack HUSSEIN Obama & Ex PM Ehud Olmert…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Several critiques of Ehud Olmert, Israel’s previous PM, have been featured at this blog. They are resounding indictments of his political failures, and with equal emphasis placed on his moral shortcomings.

But this blogger can hardly light a candle to the critical analysis of Professor Paul Eidelberg; one of the deepest thinkers on the Israeli & American landscapes (http://www.i-ari.org/, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Eidelberg). Conferring with him on pressing issues of our times is a distinct honor (https://adinakutnicki.com/about/ ).

‘Degeneration and the Plight of Israel and America’

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

“My article “A Critique of Modern Psychology,” published in the Journal Psychology,” sheds startling light on Ehud Olmert and, incidentally, on Barack Obama.

Although I am not a psychologist, I dare say that Israel’s former Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, now seeking a return to the Knesset, is afflicted by a psychological disorder of profound national and even of world-historical significance. Indeed, allow me to warn Americans that the same degeneracy is conspicuous in Barack Obama now seeking a second term as president. This, I am persuaded, would be the diagnosis of Dr. Max Nordau (1849–1923), a psychiatrist of uncommon breadth of learning. What does Nordau mean by a “degenerate”?

In 1895, Nordau published a book entitled Degeneration. Republished by the University of Chicago Press in 1968, Degeneration has been the subject of several doctoral dissertations. Nordau deemed the nexus of moral relativism and egoism as the basic cause of psychological degeneration. His book provides insights relevant to the pronouncements and policies of both Labor and Likud prime ministers, and, incidentally, of President Barack Obama.

Nordau practiced psychiatry in Paris. He found that nearly all degenerates “lack the sense of morality and of right and wrong” (p. 18). An inevitable concomitant of their moral relativism is “egomania,” which Nordau discusses at great length (pp. 241-372). He found that in many degenerates, egomania coexists with its opposite, “self-abhorrence” (p. 20). He discovered that the combination of egoism and self-loathing in degenerates conduces to impulsiveness and suggestibility on the one hand, and lack of balance and weakness of will on the other (pp. 19, 22, 23, 257-261).

Degenerates, says Nordau, lack a sense of honor, and they display no outrage by vicious attacks against innocent people (p. 260). (Notice how Israeli prime ministers consort with Arab terrorists responsible for Jewish bloodshed, and how Obama extends his hands to Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad despite the latter’s crimes against his own people and his malediction of “Death to America.”  Nor is this all.

Nordau claims that the degenerate is “incapable of correctly grasping, ordering, or elaborating into ideas and judgments the impressions of the external world.” The degenerate “surrenders himself to the perpetual obfuscation of … fugitive ideas” (p. 21). He pursues “fixed” ideas however visionary or unrealistic. [A current example would be ‘land for peace’ (p. 242).] Moreover, “facts which do not please him he does not notice, or so interprets that they seem to support his [illusion or] delirium” (p. 31).

Nordau anticipates Harry Stack Sullivan’s concept of “selective inattention.” (Notice how many Western leaders ignore fourteen centuries of Arab-Islamic plunder, butchery, and genocide). This selective inattention raises the question of whether degenerates compulsively misrepresent or consciously lie about reality. Nordau contends that they believe in the truth of their fabrications (p. 25). It seems to me, however, that conscious but habitual liars will eventually believe in the truth of many of their lies. In any event, since fear governs many degenerates (p. 19), such is their inability to face reality that even their instinct of self-preservation, according to Nordau, is crippled (p. 31).  Now let’s focus on Ehud Olmert.

On June 9, 2005, Olmert addressed the Israel Policy Forum in New York. The Sharon Government, in which Olmert served as Vice Premier, was then preparing (and indoctrinating) 50,000 soldiers and police to implement Sharon’s Gaza withdraw plan, that is, to forcefully expel Gaza’s 8,000 Jewish residents.

Dwelling in wonderland, Olmert spoke glowingly of the unilateral aspect of the Gaza withdrawal plan. He boasted to his American audience, “We really don’t need the United States to lead the [peace] process in the Middle East; we will lead this process.” Israel will lead the process, he said, because “it will be good for us and for the Palestinians” Indeed: “It will bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity, and a lot of joy for all the people that live in the Middle East.”

Self-intoxicated, Olmert confessed: “We, are tired of being courageous, we are tired of … defeating our enemies.” This is a clear case of egomania confirms which Nordau’s understanding of degeneration.  Now let’s connect some dots.

Olmert could not have been oblivious of, even if he was not outraged by, the bloody consequences of the Oslo Agreement: the wave of Arab suicide bombings in Jerusalem and elsewhere in Israel. He could not have been oblivious of the murder and maiming and traumatizing of tens of thousands of Jewish men, women, and children. Yet he, like other degenerates, supported the Government’s illusionary and suicidal policy of “land for peace.”

Despite the fatal consequences of Oslo, and contrary to the warnings of Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya’alon, IDF Chief of Staff, Maj. Gen. Aharon Ze’evi-Farkash, head of IDF Intelligence, and Avi Dichter, Director of the Shin Bet(General Security Service), Olmert boasted that “unilateral disengagement” from Gaza would be a major step toward peace. His “selective inattention” is extraordinary. (Of course, this may also be said of other Israeli politicians.)

Further, despite the fact that the Gaza withdrawal brought Hamas to power and thus enabled Iran, via its proxy, to terrorize and depopulate the Israeli town of Sderot, Olmert persisted in his fixed idea of territorial withdrawal and even applied it to Judea and Samaria. As Nordau said of degenerates: “Facts which do not please him, he does not notice, or so interprets that they seem to support his delirium.”

Ever fearful of adverse American public opinion, Olmert said he will withdraw Israeli forces from Gaza as a good will gesture to [then] incoming President Barak Obama. (Seehttp://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3658377,00.html.)

Finally, a word about Israel’s fiasco in the Second Lebanon War for which Olmert was primarily responsible. An honorable man in his place would have resigned from office, especially after the Winograd Commission informed the public of Olmert’s ineptitude in the conduct of that war. But ineptitude is typical of men without honor. As Alexander Hamilton said of the scoundrel Aaron Burr:  A man devoid of honor readily succumbs to stupidity.  Have we not witnessed examples of this in the apologetic and philo-Islamic deeds of Barack Obama?”

As degenerates are wont to do, Ehud Olmert’s critical support for the “disengagement” ( or more aptly put, the destruction of dozens of thriving Jewish communities; via the expulsion of over 8,600 Jewish citizens, violating their human rights & Israel’s Basic Law! ) mirrors those whose main goal is power – by any means necessary.

And even though Ex PM Sharon, a degenerate politician (although a highly decorated warrior) was at the helm, Ehud Olmert’s important post in the government resonated loud and clear. Thus, the bitter fruits of “disengagement” are still haunting the Jewish nation, 7 years onward and counting, and with no end in sight – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/06/22/the-bitter-fruits-of-disengagement/

Fast forward. Now, even though Ehud Olmert evaded partial indictment on his serial lawbreaking – and is still awaiting the outcome of other charges – one would think that a run for eventual re-election would be out of the question – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/10/ex-pm-olmert-may-soon-get-his-just-desserts-in-the-process-heaping-shame-upon-my-jewish-homeland-unforgivable-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-49-2/ – but NOT if one is a (im)moral degenerate.

In tandem, the most dangerous POTUS in U.S. history revealed his degenerate proclivities from the onset of his Presidency, as well as before he took office.

It is not as if the indictment againt Barack HUSSEIN Obama isn’t solid, as the most vile reprobates on the world stage champion his re-election – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/22/world-leaders-openly-endorsing-the-radical-in-chief-are-the-most-vile-dregs-in-the-international-arena-why-are-they-simpatico-to-dear-leader-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Talk about like-minded peers!

Make no mistake. The west’s downfall will not necessarily originate from its external foes, but from the moral rot within. For if ones leadership are bereft of any moral compass, how is it possible for them to secure the welfare and safety of their citizens, or impart proper national values? 

And by extension, doesn’t it make it that much easier for ones enemies, lurking outside, to pounce? In other words, the secondary factor is the outside one. The primary one is inside the diseased body politic.

WAY past time to clean house – in Israel & the U.S!

‘Feminist’ Gloria Allred Has Romney In Her Sights…Her Stock-in-Trade…Attack…Libel…Under The ‘Shield’ Of The Law…Really? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Unfortunately, there are more than a few women in the public arena who qualify as ‘femi-storm troopers’, posing as part of the ‘sisterhood’. Gloria Allred is a highly visible, abrasive, nasty piece of work, and wants nothing more than face-time before the camera. 

An egomaniac on steroids and stilettos. 

As a lawyer, sworn as an ‘officer of the court’, Allred’s penchant for smears and gutter politics is especially egregious, possibly rising to the level of libel. Few dare take her on, simply because her persona is as out-sized as her overblown ego. 

Lawyers gone wild.

Be that as it may, Allred is up to her eyeballs in her next smear, hoping to take credit for Romney’s downfall. Whether or not she achieves her goal remains to be seen, but there is nothing she won’t do to get the job done – manufacturing lies are beside the point. They are her stock-in-trade.

Patriots dare not imagine that Romney’s staff are not keeping a close eye on her. They better.

‘Republicans bracing for ‘October surprise’ as Gloria Allred ‘prepares for Romney revelation’

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

“Republicans are bracing themselves for Gloria Allred to make a potentially damaging revelation about Mitt Romney, just weeks before the election.

The pro-President Obama lawyer is rumoured to be preparing for her so-called ‘October surprise’ in which she will strike the Republican presidential hopeful’s chances by unearthing some sort of secret or scandal.

Ms Allred has refused to comment on the rumours, which first surfaced in a tweet by the Drudge Report’s Matt Drudge on Thursday.

‘Here she comes. Hearing Gloria Allred out there again, about to make a move. After all, it’s her time of the campaign. Team O at the ready!!’ Mr Drudge wrote on Twitter.

According to RadarOnline.com, Ms Allred launched a last minute strike on GOP Meg Whitman’s campaign for governor of California by representing a disgruntled former housekeeper.

In the pivotal moments of the campaign, the lawyer wheeled out Nicky Diaz who alleged that she was fired by the Whitman family because she was an illegal immigrant.

Whitman went on to lose the election to Democrat Jerry Brown.

Ms Allred refused to confirm or deny the rumours regarding Governor Romne

‘I have no comment at this time about Mr Drudge’s Tweet. I don’t discuss meetings with potential clients,’ she told RadarOnline.com.

But Republicans commentators are running scared, rallying the troops for a pre-emptive attack.

Scared: Supporters of Mitt Romney, pictured with Paul Ryan, are rallying the troops for a pre-emptive attack

New York Conservative blog, The Red Side of Life, demanded Romney supporters ‘stop her now,’ adding ‘we’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred.’

‘Gloria Allred Prepares Anti-Mitt Strike You Can STOP Her Now! (action!) Don’t underestimate Gloria Allred’s ability to inflict damage,’ the website reads.

‘The media will ‘eat up’ anything she feeds them and turn it into an endless scandal. Recall she took down Cain and RINO Whitman with NO EVIDENCE. We’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred.’ She can be stopped, but it will take action on our behalf.’

Most polls show President Obama and Mitt Romney are head to head in the final weeks before the November 6 presidential election.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2220526/Republicans-bracing-October-surprise-Gloria-Allred-prepares-Romney-revelation.html#ixzz2A2YMH46Z

The following video clip is demonstrative of her underlying modus operandi – attack…destroy…play fast & loose…all in the name of feigning the high road, but nothing could be farther from the truth.

A well coiffed snake-in-the-grass.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utL6L_ByCgs

Allred represents everything that is wrong with ‘women gone wild’; resulting in yours truly wanting to wipe that self important, smug smirk off her face. Surely she will one day be on the receiving end of all her malfeasance.

Karma is a bitch. Every dog has its day.

UPDATE: it looks like this leftist bitch received her just desserts – http://frontpagemag.com/2012/arnold-ahlert/gloria-allred-is-denied-her-october-surprise/ – a smack down via the court!

World Leaders OPENLY Endorsing The Radical-in-Chief Are The Most Vile Dregs In The International Arena…Why Are They Simpatico To ‘Dear Leader’?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The company you keep is a mirror image of who you are and what your beliefs are. This truth is self evident. However, its efficacy is of historical import, especially since the fate of western civilization hangs in the balance.

So, what are voters to make of the legion of dictators, thugs, and serial human rights violators OPENLY endorsing “The One” for a second term?

‘Chavez, Castro, Putin: Four more years!’

by: Ilana Freedman
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
“Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, right, and Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin find time for a chat during a welcoming ceremony at Miraflores Presidential Palace in Caracas,

The latest [dictator] to publicly announce his support for the commander-in-chief’s reelection bid was Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who this week assured he’d vote for Obama if he were from the United States. The America-bashing strongman made the announcement on state-owned television, saying “Obama is a good guy” and that if Obama was from Caracas, he’d surely return the favor by voting for Chavez.

Earlier in the year the government-official daughter of Cuban military dictator Raul Castro proclaimed her country’s support for Obama during a visit to the U.S. “I believe that Obama needs another opportunity and he needs greater support to move forward with his projects and with his ideas, which I believe come from the bottom of his heart,” Mariela Castro said during a cable news interview. …

That brings us to Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who has eliminated most elections in his country, monopolized all major media and destroyed the political party system. … In a letter to a major newspaper, the president of a group dedicated to expanding freedom around the world points out that under Putin there has been an “across-the-board crackdown on civil society.” The piece goes on to ask: “Will Obama stand up against Putin’s abuses?” Unlikely, now that the Russian dictator has extended his endorsement.”

http://times247.com/articles/obama-receives-endorsements-from-three-dictators#ixzz2A0Tv2UPl

In effect, is it any wonder that the likes of Chavez, Castro, and Putin (surely others of their ilk are on board, albeit more circumspectly ) are atwitter about a second term for their comrade, knowing full well that the Radical-in-Chief will be unfettered in his “flexibility/reset”?

And if it looks like a socialist, Marxist, communist plan, then it is! – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/05/if-it-looks-like-a-socialistmarxistcommunist-plan-it-is-peekingpeeling-back-into-obamas-looking-glass-his-surrogates-too-their-bomblets-waiting-to-explode-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

And does anyone, in the recesses of their cerebral thought processes, really believe that anti-American revolutionaries will not continue to do what they have done throughout history, that is, destroy all western pillars of individual liberty?   https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Thereby, how urgent is it to remove the most radical regime in U.S. history?

The most urgent task at hand!

For if he is not defeated, then the chances of reining in the Lawbreaker-in-Chief has a snowball chance in hell of succeeding – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/20/what-are-the-chances-of-reining-in-a-lawbreaker-in-chief-who-abets-illegal-aliens-then-punishes-those-who-expose-said-lawbreaking-addendum-to-the-results-of-washingtons-dictator-in-chief-via/

True to form, the Liar-in-Chief will continue to tell his tall tales, up until the votes are cast – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/13/the-liar-in-chief-his-many-tall-tells-end-game-purposefully-tearing-the-u-s-from-its-constitutional-roots-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

This blog has brought forward a resounding indictment against the Anti-American-in-Chief, a message which is painful to report on. Nevertheless, it is what it is.  Pretending otherwise will destroy the only nation which has protected the liberties and freedoms of all its citizens, as well as untold millions around the world.

Dare Americans take such a gamble; one which will change the course of history to the detriment of western civilization?

How Far Will Arabs/Muslims Go To Further Their Agenda? Chopping Down “Holy” Trees & Defaming Mohammed Too…Addendum To: Unraveling The Video…The So Called Trigger Fuse…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

NOTHING is impermissible for Muslims, as long as it is in furtherance of  the resurrection of the Caliphate. Moreover, the above goal is impossible to achieve, unless implemented through Shariah Law compliance. Hence, their worldwide push for Shariah, most especially within the halls of Washington’s power centers!

HINT: Huma Abedin’s tentacles.

Wanna bet, Huma, the hidden hand behind Hillary, made sure to signal her approval for this terrorist’s visa…out of many others, yet to be revealed – http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/10/18/state_department_granted_new_york_terror_plotter_a_student_visa

And her relationship with her “Brotherhood/Sisterhood” handlers is behind her entire “operational” blueprint –https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/27/every-alarm-bell-is-ringing-tying-barack-hussein-obama-to-the-muslim-brotherhood-huma-abedin-at-the-tippy-top-eye-popping-video-embedded-addendum-to-when-does-trucking-with-terrorists-brea/

The Caliphate uber alles…with the Sec of State as a willing participant.

Westerners still don’t get it. They view it as a wild eyed dream of those still stuck in the 6th century, where its origins began – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate, yet fail to internalize its modern lure too, as recently as 1924 -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate#End_of_the_Caliphate.2C_1924

While many westerners eschew yesterday’s news like gum under their shoes, Muslims take a longer-term historical view, even if centuries old. Failure to intuit said distinctions is the west’s fatal flaw.

Deadly.

Enter taqiyya ( explained here – http://www.meforum.org/2538/taqiyya-islam-rules-of-war ). Understanding its basis is beyond imperative. It is life-saving. In fact, it is through the “Lessons Learned” that westerners will be able to peel through their layers of deception. It is this lack of basic knowledge which absolutely places freedom and liberty at the tipping point, and imperils the long-term survival of our civilization. It is that serious.

Instead of operating from western concepts, whereupon one back scratches the other ( and give and take is the norm ), demonstrating how negotiations can best serve mutual interests, Muslims come to the table with a polar opposite interpretation/goal. Not only that, but theirs is justified through centuries of rooted religious/political dictates, immutable to western intervention.

Furthermore, it is through the concept of taquiyya –  dissembling/lying, whatever it takes to enforce Islamic doctrine – that westerners are lulled; for they hear what they want to hear, irrespective of glaring, gaping contradictions from the other side. More to the point, Muslims have been using said blinders to run circles around their western “counterparts”, especially as they jaw jaw the infidel enemy to sleep.

Shades of talking oneself to death…trying to get barbarians to behave civilized.

So, where do the “holy” olive trees come in? and what is its relation to “the Libyan video”? Anyone who has spent time in Israel and reads its newspapers, or watches related tv reports, has seen taquiyya raised to a “holy art” form, even to the point of horrendous blood libels.

Polliwoods” are the umbrella name for staged scenes, invented to portray actual facts on the ground – http://pjmedia.com/blog/taqiyya-wikileaked-docs-reveal-syrias-role-in-the-cartoon-riots/ . One infamous rendering of the Arab/Muslim “art” form – heralded/approved under the concept of taquiyya – is the  ‘Al-Durah’ blood libel. Its contents inflamed the 2nd intifada against Israel/Jews, while its poisonous lies spread worldwide. Years later, it was found to be pre-planned by Arafat – the bloody handed godfather of suicide terror – after having murdered thousands of Jews in the process! http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/02/16/muhammad-al-dura-blood-libel-palestinian-israel-myth/

Before reading the main impetus to this commentary, bear in mind how deeply fooled and duped westerners are, even those who are heralded for their smarts. While some highly alert and talented Jews recognized Al-Dura (and other staged scenes) for what it was, a preponderance didn’t. Book smarts, Nobel Prizes too, are hardly a match for taquiyya-driven Arabs/Muslims. Certainly not pleasant to admit, but there it is.

Now, take a look at the “holy” trees propaganda fest- http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9KhrTJlqWp0#!, and then internalize the report below, in relation to the “video made them do it” defense by Obama & gang and his Islamist helpmates –

‘Does ‘Innocence of Muslims’ have something in common with “Holy” Olive trees?’

by  on OCTOBER 17, 2012 in BLOGGENERAL

Walid has reported extensively on the Innocence of Muslims video that has been in the news since September 11th. The media narrative is that the film was produced by a Coptic Christian. He has repeatedly challenged this assertion and has produced plenty of evidence that indicates Nakoula Basseley Nakoula (Mark Bacile Yousef) is not a Christian at all.

In fact, Nakoula has a long history of working with Eiad Salameh, a Muslim fundamentalist who hates Copts. How do we know? Because Eiad is Walid’s first cousin and Walid knows his background quite well. Walid has also produced evidence that Salameh, who was a partner in crime with Nakoula for many years, was offered to the Feds in 2011 by the Canadian Peel Police but the Feds declined to pick him up.

According to court documents, Nakoula had been given a lighter sentence in order to help the Feds catch Salameh, so the Feds’ reticence to do so when the Canadians offered up Salameh is quite perplexing.

Quite frankly, the evidence Walid has collected points to Nakoula being someone completely different from his portrayal by both the left and right wing media. That evidence calls into question his being a Coptic Christian at all.

This has been where we’ve run into some resistance because accepting this new premise would mean it is indeed possible that Nakoula is actually part of a Muslim plot that includes intentionally producing an anti-Muhammad video to further an Islamic agenda.

Despite the evidence, this possibility has been a tough sell.

One of the reasons very well may be that many consider it a stretch that Muslims (or Muslim operatives) would make an anti-Muhammad video and blame its production on non-Muslims, in this case, Coptic Christians.

Ladies and gentlemen, may we present some anecdotal evidence that such a scenario should not be dismissed out of hand?

Claims made by Palestinians – that Jewish settlers have been destroying holy Palestinian olive trees – have been rebutted by news reports dating back to at least 2010. So who’s destroying these ‘holy’ trees?

Via Anne’s Opinions (h/t BNI):

Every year we hear the same story – the dastardly evil Jewish settlers cut down holy Palestinian olive trees in the middle of the olive harvest in order to steal their land*/starve them out*/destroy them economically*/etc.* (* delete where and if applicable).

And every year the Israelis bring videos and photos as evidence that the Palestinians are harming their own property purely to slander Israel and blacken its name.

Thanks to algemeiner, we have video accompanied with commentary at the end that has been translated by Anne’s Opinions.

First the video: (click on link for article)

Here is the translated commentary given by the man at the end of that video (his name is Benny Katzover):

“The olive harvest season has begun, and with it the season of incitement. We called on the public to equip themselves with cameras, and already today we’ve seen near Elon Moreh cutting down of really big tree branches, which in the next round will be presented as “uprooting of trees”. They might be planning the next libel here.

In order to be prepared for the worst, this time we filmed the tree-cutters. They want to light a fire, either for their ovens or for their libels against the Jewish residents [of Judea & Samaria], and we caught them red-handed. The scale of the tree-cutting and its proximity to the settlement is very suspicious, also because it can be used for reconnaissance and then for security-related incidents.

I call once again on all the public to equip themselves with cameras, to follow these incidents, to document them and most importantly to film them. This is the most useful weapon against them, both to counter the libel and conversely, to take the offensive to the Arabs who take advantage of the naivete, not to mention the malice, of the world, to blacken the name of Israel and its residents.”

Arutz Sheva also reported on the incident caught on video.

While differing only in matters of degree, such tactics are not only straight out of Hitler’s Nazi Germany (Reichtag Fire and Kristallnacht) but, if true, they demonstrate a willingness on the part of these Palestinians to desecrate, deface, or otherwise defame “holy” objects in order to bear false witness against the Jews.

With this as a premise, it is indeed plausible that Innocence of Muslims was made for a similar purpose and shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand.

Based on the evidence Walid has uncovered, perhaps plausibility should be set as a baseline.

Another question that needs to be continually asked is…

Where is Eiad?

http://www.shoebat.com/2012/10/17/does-innocence-of-muslims-have-something-in-common-with-holy-olive-trees/

Those of us who live among Arabs/Muslims, and others who study their history, culture and religious/political tenets, are able to piece together what is right under our noses. This American-Israeli is pleased as punch to find that Gadi Adelman’s assessment, as a counter terror writer and lecturer, is in sync with much of this blog’s analysis – http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/keep-your-friends-close-and-your-enemies-closer?f=must_reads

Therefore, offering up the above – as much more than food for thought – should be seen for what it is; a gift from those who make it their business to know…passing on real life lessons to fellow westerners.

Hopefully, the “Lessons Learned” will be put to practical use!

Is Any More Evidence Required To Demonstrate The Pernicious Effects Of The Islamist-in-Chief’s Middle East Mischief Making? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As is said, the proof is in the pudding…or atop the dead bodies littering the region.

Thus, as tens of thousands die, due to the unrestrained hands of Iran’s terror axis, the Islamist-in-Chief stays Israel’s hand, and to a lesser extent Turkey’s. Nevertheless, this blogger has enough on her plate, so worrying over the ambitions ( for regional hegemony, as he seeks to become the next Caliph ) of Erdogan, Turkey’s Islamist leader, as well as Israel’s foe, is hardly top priority.

The fact of the matter is that the lone superpower, under the enabling of its Islamist-in-Chief, is emboldening the most mortal foes of the west. And the evidence is clear for the world to see – or not.

‘Syria, Iran, Hizballah attack while US and Israel play computerized war games’

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis October 20, 2012

The assassination of the anti-Syrian Head of the Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces intelligence branch, Brig. Gen. Wissam al-Hasan, Friday, Oct. 19, by a huge car bomb blast in East Beirut’s Ashrafiya district marked the brutal spillover of the Syrian bloodbath into a second Arab capital and the threat of itsl spread towards Israel.
Eighteen months ago, in May 2011, shortly after Syrians rose up against Bashar Assad, Rami Makhlouf, a leading architect of his tactics of suppression, warned, “If there is no stability here, there’s no way there will be stability in Israel.”
Israel should take careful note of the outrage in Beirut in which seven Lebanese were killed and 73 injured in order to liiquidate Assad’s foe in Beirut.

In August, Gen. Al-Hasan uncovered a Syrian plot to destabilize Lebanon by a bombing campaign and arrested the pro-Syrian politician and ex-information minister Michel Samaha for complicity in the plot. He also led the investigation that implicated Damascus in the 2005 bombing atrocity that killed former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.
Gen. Al-Hasan’s murder brought forth angry protesters.They blocked roads and highways in several towns including the Beirut-Syrian road link as the Lebanese government met in emergency session Saturday, Oct. 20, and announced a day of national mourning.
In the wider sense, the murder of the Lebanese anti-Syrian terror crusader demonstrated that hopes in the West and Israel of the Syrian conflict eventually sundering the Tehran-Damascus-Hizballah axis were no better than pipedreams, just like the belief that liquidating Iran’s nuclear scientists or cyber warfare would turn Tehran back from its march towards a nuclear weapon.
After nearly two years, those illusions have been dissipated: The Syrian bloodbath is spreading more malignantly than ever with solid Iranian and Hizballah support and Tehran is closer than ever to realizing its nuclear aspirations.
This week, US President Barack Obama reined in Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and his chief of staff Gen. Necdet Ozel from expanding Turkish cross-border clashes with Syria by sending Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, to Ankara. His restraining hand kept Turkey from going beyond artillery backing for Syrian rebels inside a10-kilometer limit inside Syria. He also cautioned the Turks against sending their warplanes across the border into Syrian airspace.
Because of these curbs, US Ambassador to Turkey Francis Ricciardone was able to state Tuesday “We don’t see a possibility of war between Syria and Turkey.” He spoke to reporters in Ankara with the top American soldier beside him.

If they were talking, Turkish Erdogan could compare notes with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has experienced similar Washington restraints against launching military action to curtail Iran’s nuclear program.

Whether or not the United States should step into the two blazing conflicts with two feet – or limit itself to extending military support from the outside to the forces willing to take on Syria and Iran – is a tough question which the two US presidential contenders, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney may address in their third and final pre-election debate in Florida, Monday, Oct. 22.
The differences between the rivals on this point don’t appear substantial. However their contest in the run-up to the Nov.6 election has diverted attention from Ankara and Jerusalem and rescued the Turkish and Israeli leaders from even tougher questions about their reluctance to act without America – Turkey versus Syria and Israel versus Iran –  although the Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah menace is knocking on their doors.
They are not alone. The list of Middle East governments, shy of acting without America against encroaching threats from one or more of the three aggressors, includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the rest of the Gulf emirates.
The rulers of Russia, Iran and its Lebanese arm Hizballah, in contrast, were emboldened by the US ambassador’s comment in Ankara, its effect on Erdogan and Netanyahu’s non-response to the Iranian stealth drone’s invasion of Israeli air space. They concluded that both leaders would continue to sit on their hands.
And so Assad seized the moment for sending his air force to assault opposition forces with unprecedented fury. Cluster bombs were dropped without mercy on urban areas, causing an estimated 1,200 deaths and reducing entire villages and small towns to smoking rubble.
And his assassins struck across the border into the heart of Beirut for a devastating bombing attack that recalled the horrors of a former Assad bombing campaign against his Lebanese opponents, one of which dispatched the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri in 2005.
Every few days, the Syria-Hizballah-Iran bloc ratchets up the violence with a new outrage in the certainty that there will be no comeback.
Sunday, Oct. 21, the US and Israel launch Austere Challenge 12, which they are calling their biggest joint war game ever, to practice defending Israel against a missile attack.
But in tune with the general air of denial hanging over Washington and Jerusalem, the exercise has been reduced in scale to just 1,000 soldiers on each side, with most of the action conducted through simulated computer games. As every soldier knows, this is a far cry from real operations on a battlefield.

Both American and Israeli war planners also realize that even these games are only applicable to defenses against an Iranian ballistic missile attack – not a triple Iranian-Syrian-Hizballah missile assault. This would call for US-Israeli air force intervention. But the air force is not taking part in the war game.”

http://debka.com/article/22455/Syria-Iran-Hizballah-attack-while-US-and-Israel-play-computerized-war-games

IF any further analysis/evidence is required, to shore up yesterday’s thesis at this blog- https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/19/is-a-deal-being-cut-with-irans-hitlerite-regime-to-save-the-islamist-in-chiefs-electoral-prospects-smokin-the-free-world-in-the-process-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ – the above link from DEBKA yields more than enough firepower.

What Are The Chances Of Reining In A Lawbreaker-in-Chief…Who Abets Illegal Aliens…Then Punishes Those Who Expose Said Lawbreaking? Addendum To : The Results Of Washington’s Dictator-in-Chief Via Short Video…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Once a lawbreaker, always a lawbreaker, unless requisite lessons are learned. In other words, without proper intervention – either family-wise or institutional – the chances of “going straight” are slimmer than a virgin in a whorehouse. Even a rookie cop knows the score.

So, what chance is there to rein in a Renegade-in-Chief, and his lawless AG, when lawbreaking has become their “rule of law”? A snowball in hell.

The preponderance of evidence, indicting the two chief culprits, is overwhelming. And their penchant for lawbreaking invariably is politically based, knowing full well that “legalizing” illegals will shore up their voting base. Not only that, but like typical hoods, they indict others for their moral failings, to hell with the wreckage in their wake.

Thus, the Liar-in-Chief tells so many tall tales, it is impossible to know where one begins, and another ends – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/13/the-liar-in-chief-his-many-tall-tells-end-game-purposefully-tearing-the-u-s-from-its-constitutional-roots-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Hail to the Chief Liar.

NOT unlike goons all over, he too has his squads, ready, willing and able to execute his plans – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/video-exposes-the-thug-in-chief-his-goon-squads-no-less-than-six-degrees-of-separation-adina-kutnicki/.

Again, political ends underlie the Liar-in-Chief’s modus operandi, unlike garden variety thugs who usually terrorize for a quick financial score – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

For those in need of video footage, here’s the fruits of their (mis)labors – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/22/the-results-of-washingtons-dictator-in-chief-via-short-video-clip-adina-kutnicki/and the following, from FoxNews, attests to their absolute flouting of the law of the land – the Constitution.

‘Obama’s refusal to deport illegal aliens unconstitutional, say law professors’

By 

October 13, 2012

FoxNews.com

“Two law professors, including one who served in the Bush Justice Department, have published a paper charging that President Obama violated the Constitution with his directive to law enforcement not to deport illegal aliens.

In the paper entitled, “The Obama Administration, the Dream Act and the Take Care Clause,” authors Robert Delahunty of the University of St. Thomas [Minnesota] and John Yoo, a law professor at University of California at Berkeley and former U.S. deputy assistant attorney general, blast Obama’s moratorium on deporting certain illegal immigrants. The professors dismissed the idea that the decision on whether to deport illegal immigrants who are arrested for minor infractions is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.

“It’s the duties of the president. He must always uphold the law.”

– John Yoo, Berkeley law professor and former State Department attorney

“If there’s one case and it’s left to the prosecutor well that’s fine, but what Obama did was take a million cases and leave it up to prosecutorial discretion, “John Yoo said to FoxNews.com. “The only reason it’s under [Department of Homeland Security Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s discretion is because Obama had made his decision. If she’s doing it under her own, she would have to be fired.”

An abstract for the paper debunks the claim that the president has the Constitutional right to not enforce civil laws crafted and passed by Congress.

“It’s the duty of the president. He must always uphold the law,” Yoo said, adding that the only exceptions in doing so are if laws are unconstitutional or if prosecuting them can be reasonably deemed not viable.

Officials from the White House declined to comment on the paper, referring FoxNews.com to DHS.

“The authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to exercise prosecutorial discretion, including by granting deferred action, has long been established and has been recognized by the Supreme Court,” said DHS spokesman Peter Boogaard. “This authority was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court just this year [Arizona v. United States (2012)].”

“That said, DHS’s deferred action for childhood arrivals process is only a temporary measure that does not provide a path to citizenship; Congress must still act to provide a permanent solution to fix the broken immigration system.  Until Congress acts, DHS is dedicated to implementing smart, effective reforms to the immigration system that allow it to focus its resources on common sense enforcement priorities, including criminals and other public safety threats.”

In June, President Obama announced that the deporting of young, undocumented immigrants who match criteria from already-proposed DREAM Act lesgilastion would end under his administration’s watch. The effect was to put in place most of the measures in the act, but by administrative order, not through the legislative process. In August, a group of federal agents filed a lawsuit against DHS secretary Janet Napolitano, claiming that the new directive forces them to break the law.

Under the DREAM Act, illegal aliens who are eligible beneficiaries would not have faced deportation as long as they meet the following criteria:

  • Proof of having arrived in the United States before age 16.
  • Proof of residence in the United States for at least five consecutive years since their arrival date.
  • Register with the Selective Service if they are male.
  • Be between the ages of 12 and 35 at the time that the bill was enacted.
  • Obtained a high school diploma of GED, or admitted to an institution of higher education.
  • Be of good moral character.

Opponents of the DREAM Act, which still has not been passed in Congress, say that it – as well as Obama’s order, encourages illegal immigration while adding economic and social burdens to the United States.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who was a key backer of the DREAM Act, blasted the president’s preemption of the in June, when DHS announced policies on immigration enforcement that.

“There is broad support for the idea that we should figure out a way to help kids who are undocumented through no fault of their own, but there is also broad consensus that it should be done in a way that does not encourage illegal immigration in the future. This is a difficult balance to strike, one that this new policy, imposed by executive order, will make harder to achieve in the long run.”

“…by once again ignoring the Constitution and going around Congress, this short term policy will make it harder to find a balanced and responsible long term one.”

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/13/obama-refusal-to-deport-illegal-aliens-unconstitutional-say-law-professors/#ixzz29MLlBvUZ

Par for the course, what else can one expect from an anti-American regime, other than to punish those who expose said lawbreaking, and also question the bonafides/motives of “Dear Leader”?

Here’s what else one can expect:

‘ATF Whistleblower Fired in Denny’s Parking Lot For Exposing Corruption’

Special Agent Vince Cefalu has worked for the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms for more than 25 years. On top of successfully placing dozens of hard criminals behind bars throughout his career, Cefalu has received promotions and consistently positive evaluations. When he started raising his voice about ATF corruption and illegal wiretapping in 2005, things changed.  Tuesday evening, Cefalu was asked to meet Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Division Joseph Riehl at a Denny’s Restaurant near Lake Tahoe. When he arrived, he was served termination papers in the parking lot. Classy move. The exchange was secretly recorded by a confidential source. David Codrea has more:

The video, shaky at times from being handheld, and with color imbalance streaking happening inadvertently in the uploading to YouTube, was recorded by a confidential source and shows Cefalu approached by two ATF management representatives including Joseph M. Riehl, Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Division, which encompasses Northern California and Nevada field offices.

Riehl, seen talking to Cefalu through his Jeep window and reportedly telling him he couldn’t leave because he had to sign papers, had been criticized on the CUATF forum, and Gun Rights Examiner is attempting to track down audit reports to determine what an independent assessment reveals about the allegations there. But the bottom line is, an employee with over 25 years of service who has been a leading spokesman for whistleblowers was unceremoniously canned in a public parking lot by senior division management.

Cefalu was placed on administrative leave a year and a half ago after speaking out about Operation Fast and Furious. In 2009, he launched the website CleanUpATF.org in order for agents within ATF to blow the whistle on corrupt behavior anonymously due to the agency’s history of retaliation against those who “jump their chain of command.” His website is where bloggers and news reporters first saw allegations of gunwalking. The site is heavily monitored by the Department of Justice.

In the February 2012 issue of Townhall Magazine, Cefalu detailed the ATF corruption leading up to Fast and Furious and his retaliation case coming from inside the bureau that led to his firing this week.

My name is Vincent A. Cefalu. I am a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms under the U.S. Department of Justice. Welcome to our nightmare. I say “our” because dozens of us can’t write a single article, and I have been asked and am privileged to speak on behalf of my peers who have not had the opportunity to voice their concerns related to ATF mismanagement, particularly with Operation Fast and Furious. This grotesquely dangerous and reckless operation should have never been considered, much less allowed to occur. It employed the unprecedented practice of allowing fi rearms to be transferred to violent criminals without any interdiction effort at all, in hopes of somehow later identifying high-level Mexican cartel members. But it was the pattern of gross mismanagement that had been allowed to exist in ATF—and that I witnessed—which fostered an environment that unleashed this operation, violating public trust on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border.

At no time in my career prior to becoming a complainant against my own agency—the agency I love and have been honored to serve— could I have ever been convinced I would be the poster boy for whistleblowers and challenges to corrupt government. As a young Marine military policeman, I was thrilled, proud and honored to be in law enforcement. I never considered it work….

But I ended up the lead agent in a case with huge vendetta overtones by my state and local counterparts, where members of an ad hoc task force insisted on fast-tracking wiretap attempts against the suspects. I refused. When I reported this officially, senior management retroactively fabricated justifications for the actions they were preparing to take against me. This led to a network of frustrated agents and inspectors, which ultimately resulted in my being contacted regarding the gun-walking practices and cover-ups related to Fast and Furious. I took this information to Congress and advocated others to do the same.

In the 18 months leading up to Fast and Furious, Special Agent in Charge Bill Newell’s actions required that the agency had to pay out over a million dollars in settlements which should have led to his removal for the related conduct, had it ever been investigated and documented. Special Agent in Charge George Gillette had been disciplined multiple times, and his subordinates had logged dozens of complaints related to his incompetence and mismanagement. Had ATF dealt with them at the time, the Fast and Furious program would never have been undertaken. However, by attacking those who exposed corruption, ATF was able to keep their golden boys in place. This process was repeated all over the country (Newell has since been relocated to D.C. headquarters, but not fired). So pronounced was the mismanagement that ATF logged more complaints than either the DEA or FBI per agent. This is notable because the latter two are much larger agencies.

I write this article almost 6 years into the whistleblower process with ATF and only after millions of taxpayer dollars and countless hours of manpower have been expended by my agency to attack and discredit me and other whistleblowers.

The environment at ATF today is one where honest officers cannot act without fear of reprisal from dishonest officers. Such is this agent’s story, and the story of many other whistleblowers, including those involved in Fast and Furious.

Whistleblowers are often put under the supervision of corrupt ATF officials who have the intention of retaliating against them no matter what the circumstances. The Department of Justice has done little to prevent this behavior despite the act of retaliation being illegal and a violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act.

ATF’s termination decision comes just weeks after Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General James Cole about a rift between the Reno ATF Field Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

As you may be aware, I recently contacted both Nevada U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) Acting Director B. Todd Jones about allegations from whistleblowers that a breakdown in relations had occurred between ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) in Reno, Nevada.[1]  I have not yet received a briefing from either of their offices.

The alleged breakdown is illustrated in a declination memorandum from the Reno USAO, which indicates that as of September 29, 2011, the Reno USAO categorically refused to accept any cases submitted by Reno ATF.  The declination memo states, “We are willing to consider your cases again when your management addresses and resolves the issues at hand.”[2]  Apparently as a consequence, ATF’s Reno Field Office has only opened one case in 2012, as the attached chart indicates.[3]

I have since obtained documents from whistleblowers which indicate that these issues were raised with ATF headquarters and the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) almost a year ago.  According to one document, ATF agents in Reno notified ATF’s Internal Affairs Division of the issue on October 13, 2011.[4]  According to a second document, an ATF agent in Reno notified OPR on October 25, 2011.[5]  As you may know, because of ATF and the Reno USAO’s inability to resolve these issues, three ATF line agents and a supervisor were transferred out of Reno in April 2012.

In light of these facts, I am seeking to understand whether Justice Department management was also notified of the problems between ATF and the USAO in Reno, and if so, what actions were taken to rectify these issues.  Your office, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), is responsible for overseeing both ATF and U.S. Attorneys.

Cefalu says he will challenge ATF’s decision. The following was posted on CleanUpATF shortly after the termination was issued.

Well, they’ve finally gone ahead and done it. ATF’s San Francisco hatchet men just served Special Agent Vince Cefalu with termination papers in the parking lot of a Dennys. They did this over a year and half after proposing the termination . Notwithstanding the transparently trumped-up nature of the so-called “charges” in question, proposing a termination and then excuting it over a year and a half later is prima facie evidence that the action is unsustainable and is virtually certain to be reversed on appeal.

Moreover, the allegations used as a basis for the adverse action are laughably unfounded, deliberately fabricated, and relied largely on the testimony of ATF officials who committed easily-provable felony perjury in open court and later in sworn depositions. I herein predict that a number of the people involved in this grotesque act of bald-faced unlawful retaliation and obstruction of justice will do significant jail time before this is all over.

I will also say with confidence that this was by far the stupidest , most ill-advised course of action that they (ATF management) could possibly have taken in this case. Rather than quietly settling what a mediocre first-year law student would recognize to be a Hindenburg of a losing case (for them), ATF just substantially amplified the damages award that Cefalu will, in my opinion, recover at trial. Talk about stepping in it.

It’s well-known that ATF management and their viciously corrupt counsel are, for the most part, brutally self-serving and mean-spirited. But this Cefalu termination is nevertheless surprising in its utter incomprehensibility under the circumstances, from purely legal and elemental federal labor law standpoints. If they had any prayer of making the action stick, they had to do it more than a year ago, before so many additional events have transpired that will render the termination plainly unlawful and inescapably untenable. It’s just plain moronic no matter how you slice it.

It seems apparent that ATF’s leadership at all levels has degenerated to a pathetic state of paroxysmal, shoot-from-the-hip incompetence. They can’t even do the wrong thing right.

Things are far from over.” –http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/10/12/atf_whistleblower_fired_in_dennys_parking_lot

How far has the U.S. fallen, to have (s)elected such thuggish, gangsters-in-suits to lead the nation? 

It’s a rhetorical – but no less painful – question.

 

UPDATE: See Link At End: Is A Deal Being Cut With Iran’s Hitlerite Regime To Save the Islamist-in-Chief’s Electoral Prospects…Smokin’ The Free World In The Process?..Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Cutting to the chase.

IF Israel’s leaders cooperate with the Islamist-in-Chief, helping him (in any way, shape or form) play this deadly game with the Iranian Hitler, then they too are unworthy of taking care of cats and dogs. In effect, they will be sealing Israel’s fate, as well as half of world Jewry. In tandem, American citizens will be placed in GRAVE danger. America is the Big Satan – their ultimate prey. However, Israel has to succumb first.

Now, this blogger is VERY suspicious of the timing of the current war games in Israel, between US & Israeli forces. In other words, this mega exercise was initially scheduled for the summer and suddenly it was canceled, rescheduled to two weeks BEFORE the election! 

VERY convenient.

Now, what better way to hold the IDF in check, than to have US boots on our soil? In other words, no rational Israeli leader wants US boots on the ground during a pre-emption. However, close by – in the region – is in everyone’s best interest. Few will argue with this thesis. The point being, the IDF needs unfettered room to operate!

Along comes this scuttlebutt and yours truly knows, where there is smoke there is fire. Ladies and gents, this blogger believes the free world has been smoked!

Pay rapt attention to the part Valerie Jarrett plays in this western betrayal…and recall this blogger’s previous assertions – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/

‘OBAMA CUTS DEAL WITH IRAN OVER NUKES’

Sanctions to vanish in exchange for ‘temporary’ halt in enrichment work

Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar.

The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.

The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.

French intelligence verified today that Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement, according to Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former intelligence officer in the regime who has defected to Europe.

The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.

The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.

According to the Iranian source, a previous Obama letter to Khamenei indicated that it’s best for the regime not to give any motive to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, a message that was re-emphasized in the Qatar negotiations.

As reported exclusively by WND Oct. 4, a three-person delegation led by a woman on behalf of the Obama administration traveled to Qatar about Oct. 1 and met with Iranian counterparts, including Ali Akbar Velayati, the former foreign minister of the Islamic regime and a close adviser to Khamenei on international matters.

In the meeting, according to the source, the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected. A Romney presidency, the delegation said, would surely move more toward Israel, and the Iranians were reminded that Obama has stood up to Israel against any plans to attack Iran. The regime’s delegate was urged to understand that if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.

Days after the WND report, Ali Akbar Salehi, the regime’s foreign minister, in an
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, stated, “If our right to enrichment is guaranteed, we are prepared to offer an exchange.”

The same message was relayed by several other officials of the regime.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently in Kazakhstan that the sanctions can be lifted immediately if Tehran worked with world powers to address questions about its nuclear program.

In the Qatar meeting, according to the Iranian source, the American woman delegate, who has had several meetings with Velayati during the past several years, jokingly told Velayati that she will be the next secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in a second Obama administration and that it would be wise for Iranians to invest in U.S. real estate.

In the past five months, four meetings were held in the U.S. with the Islamic regime’s surrogates to hash out what was to be discussed at the Doha meeting. The source identified Valerie Jarrett, a senior Obama adviser, as the head of the U.S. effort to engage Iran. Also identified was Cyrus Amir Mokri, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department for financial institutions, as another member advising the president on the issue.

Jarrett’s family has known the Velayati family since their stay in Iran in the 1950s, the source added. Jarrett’s father worked at the Namazi hospital in Shiraz, owned by an Iranian family that has been influential with the regime after the Islamic Revolution.

WND contacted both the U.S. State Department and the White House, asking about the Doha negotiations, who led the delegation from the U.S., whether Obama will provide the written guarantee, what negotiations the U.S. has pursued on its own and what is known about Amano’s plan to travel to Iran for the announcement.

The State Department declined to respond to multiple calls as well as email inquiries. A spokeswoman said the White House would not comment.

The European Union, which increased sanctions on Iran last week, fears back-channel negotiations between the Obama administration and Iran will leave it out. EU leaders are seeking to send a group of representatives from seven European countries to Tehran to strengthen their position with the regime over the nuclear program and their economic interests.

The Iranian currency, meanwhile, has hit another historic low, falling to 43,000 rials to one U.S. dollar. As reported recently, a secret memo by the Intelligence Ministry to regime officials has warned of major riots in Iran due to dire economic conditions.

Another internal report by the government’s Economic Commission indicated that government foreign currency reserves will run out in the coming months and that it will have difficulty meeting payrolls for public employees who could lose 50 percent of their pay.

Many within the Iranian opposition believe that if the West continues to pressure the Islamic regime and supports the aspirations of the majority of the Iranian people who resent the regime and its ideology, the regime will face a nationwide uprising and will collapse from within, changing the geopolitics of not only the region but the world.

However, if the regime is provided a lifeline for whatever reason, not only will it get the bomb but it will take Iranians and the world hostage for decades to come, they believe.

An Oct. 8 WND report revealed another secret nuclear site in Iran. The regime’s nuclear scientists have successfully completed testing of a neutron detonator and have nearly completed design of a nuclear warhead.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/

To be sure, if Jerusalem was less afraid of Washington, than they are of Iran’s killing machine (and the rest of her terror proxies), none of this would matter. Those in the know understand this – the stranglehold that Washington has over Israel is way more dangerous than her surrounding enemies. Unrestrained (and by extension, the question becomes: who is tying her hands?) the region can be re-arranged, and in Israel’s favor. Jerusalem has the requisite firepower.

Besides, the threat of a cutoff of U.S. military aid ( a drop in Israel’s GDP bucket…plus the costs of its attached strings…pushing said monies back into U.S. defense contractor’s coffers) is not Washington’s main grip. All the players know this. Its death-like vise constitutes a corrosive relationship between Washington & Jerusalem, and its main caveat takes root in the collusion between Israel’s ruling, leftist elite and their ‘friends’ in Washington. ( push aside any notion of a ‘right wing’ leadership…they are NOT in charge in Jerusalem – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/06/22/the-paradox-of-israeli-politicsvote-right-get-left/)

The right ( no pun intended ) questions to ask have always been: why do Israel’s political leaders allow her enemies to still stand, understanding full well the absolute strength of their country’s military capabilities? Why do they always stop short of VICTORY?

The answers tell the deadly tale, and many Israelis/Jews are its sacrifices.

UPDATE: – see this – http://debka.com/article/22457/Obama-Khamenei-summit-would-cap-long-back-channel-dialogue

Hillary Takes The Fall For The POTUS In Bengazigate…But There IS A Silver Lining…Shining The Spotlight On Huma Abedin…Addendum To: Uncovering The Tip Of Huma Abedin’s Spear…The House of Al-Saud…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

How many times does a “gift toss in the mouth” come along ( directed at the general public, thereby, giving them a golden opportunity to pressure their reps to perform their due diligence), especially when it concerns matters of top national security considerations? Rarely, if ever. Why not? Because officials at the highest levels have many handy helpers to cover their wayward/illicit tracks.

So, along comes the Liar-in-Chief doing what he does best, that is, lie…lie…and lie some more. The trail ( to just some of his many lies ) can be found at this blog – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/13/the-liar-in-chief-his-many-tall-tells-end-game-purposefully-tearing-the-u-s-from-its-constitutional-roots-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. But certain lies offer unique opportunities to ferret out important truths, and Bengazigate should be a major exhibit to prove said thesis.

Some issues are worthy of heavy lifting. This is one of them.

On the one hand, Hillary Clinton, in her capacity as Sec of State, is in charge of embassies around the world, plus other tasks. Nevertheless, there is enough circumstantial evidence pointing to the Islamist-in-Chief, for his failure to secure the safety of the embassy’s staff in Libya. Besides, the buck does stop with the POTUS, whether Democrat or Republican. 

Back to the gift toss. 

Readers are familiar with this blog’s “kinship” with Huma Abedin, Deputy Chief of Staff to gal pal, Hill. It is legitimate to ask: what has she done this time, to bring her back into the spotlight? Not a damn thing, other than be who she is  – an Islamist Muslim Brotherhood Mafia operative; joined at the hip with each and every decision coming out of her boss’s office –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/16/uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-islamic-spear-the-house-of-al-saud-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Why is this relevant to Bengazigate? Consider: now that the POTUS threw Hill under the bus ( aren’t you all thoroughly shocked?), surely an official inquiry will require her to testify on all related matters. Far be if for this American-Israeli to take a quantum leap in logic, but isn’t it logical to assume, that a corroborating witness will be called upon to testify? And who is more qualified than the one person who shadows her each and every official (and some might suggest, unofficial ones too) move? 

It is gratifying not to be alone in one’s mental meanderings, simply because the above theory was formed BEFORE Walid Shoebat’s was brought forth, and he knows the score way better than most! Clearly this track of thinking opens up many delicious possibilities…manna from heaven.

‘Oversight Committee should call Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin to testify over Benghazi-gate’ – by  on OCTOBER 16, 2012

“With Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly accepting ‘responsibility’ for the security of all State Department diplomats stationed at the various outposts all over the world – including at the Benghazi consulate – shouldn’t the matter of her closest adviser, Huma Abedin become relevant again?

Hillary’s acceptance of responsibility should also come with a requirement to testify in front of the congressional committee that has decided to take the lead in investigating what happened at Benghazi.

That would be the House Oversight Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

Testimony given by four State Department officials at an Oversight Committee hearing on October 10th revealed that security – which Hillary has said she is ultimately responsible for – in Benghazi was woefully inadequate, despite repeated requests for additional security assets in Libya. Regional Security Officer (RSO) Eric Nordstrom was so frustrated with the State Department’s refusal to release assets that he said it felt like “the Taliban was on the inside of the building”. Lt. Col. Andrew Wood said of his own attempts to acquire additional security assets:

“We were fighting a losing battle. We couldn’t even keep what we had.”

The failures in Benghazi are becoming painfully obvious. They were political, cultural, procedural and the result of very bad policies implemented as a result of incompetence, negligence, or malice.

In October 10th testimony, Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary for international programs at the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomat Security said in response to Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL) that she did not have sole authority to deny requests for security assets. When Adams demanded the names of who did, Lamb begrudgingly provided them:

The two men Lamb singled out as being responsible for having the authority to deny security assets should also be called to testify.

However, while many may consider it admirable for Secretary Clinton to inform us all that the buck stops with her, any such admiration should come with an expectation of transparency and forthrightness. Responsibility without accountability isn’t worth a wooden nickel.

On June 13th, Rep. Michele Bachmann and four other congressmen sent five separate letters to five separate Inspectors General. One of those letters went to the Deputy Inspector General at the State Department. The primary concern expressed in the letters was the possibility that there has been Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. Government. The most controversial name mentioned by Bachmann, et. al. was Huma Abedin, who was singled out in theletter to the State Department. Abedin, Secretary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff and closest adviser, has extensive and irrefutable familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and an al-Qaeda financier named Abdullah Omar Naseef.

It has now been widely acknowledged that the attack in Benghazi was either perpetrated by al-Qaeda or entities sympathetic to al-Qaeda.

Remember, al-Qaeda is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Though each group has shared goals, preferred means of achieving them are quite different.

That brings us back to Huma Abein. For twelve years, she worked as an Assistant Editor with the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), leaving in late 2008 to take a job with Hillary Clinton at the State Department.

Again, the IMMA was founded by none other than al-Qaeda financier Naseef, who served on the IMMA advisory board for many years while Huma sat on the Editorial Board.

While it may not be common protocol to call advisers to testify in front of congressional committees, the case of Huma Abedin does seem to present a unique set of circumstances. Her her mother and the wife of Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi being close colleagues in the Muslim Sisterhood.

By accepting responsibility for the security of all State Department diplomats, Hillary Clinton has welcomed the spotlight of scrutiny whether she wants it or not. As her closest adviser, Huma Abedin should not escape that spotlight in light of both her background and her significant influence on Hillary.

Based on Abedin’s connections to entities and individuals that have shown support for al-Qaeda’s agenda in the past, she should be required to testify as well.”

http://www.shoebat.com/2012/10/16/oversight-committee-should-call-hillary-clinton-and-huma-abedin-to-testify-over-benghazi-gate/ …and some more to chew on – http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-reality-check-hillary-clinton-accepting-responsibility-for-benghazi/

Most significantly, the attack in Libya, by AlQaeda offshoots, was hardly unexpected, except maybe to the academically challenged, affirmative action college student. For heavens sake, embassy staff PLEADED for more security. More to the point, Obama & gang have some explaining to do – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/further-untangling-of-the-video-the-islamist-in-chiefs-tailor-made-excuse-for-islamic-murder-mayhem-where-the-truth-lies-addendum-to-unraveling-the-video-commentary-by-adina-kutni/.

Pressure…more pressure…

In concert, the very fact that the Islamist-in-Chief called for Qadaffi’s overthrow  (prepping the ground via Samantha Powers R2P template, similar to his ousting of Mubarak; thus empowering the Brotherhood Mafia & its Salafist counterparts…how stupid do they think regular folks are?),understanding full well that the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, the progenitor of AlQaeda would fill the void, lends a people’s indictment straight back to his door. He indeed set the Islamist train wreck in motion. Similarly, would giving bank robbers the keys to the vault ring any alarm bells?

Thus, not only should Barack HUSSEIN Obama be judged for his own wrongs (through his “assistance” to Islamists, whether overt or covert), but Huma Abedin’s less than six degrees of separation, to the attendant terror organs, must finally come to the public fore.

If not now, then when?

When Is The U.S. (& Others) Near Bowed? When Israeli Flags…Christians Too…Are Banned In A City Near You…Addendum To: Movie Makers, Corporate Heads, Police Too…Dancing To Islamic Edicts…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Some things can only effectively be described by the expletive – W T F.

Regardless, even when ones ability to still be shocked is slim to none, along comes an act of brazenness which may even defy the saltiest description. Wording aside, composure is in order so that counter attacks can be planned. Lovers of freedom and liberty dare not stay silent and lay prostrate.

To understand what is at stake the following should lead the charges against complacency; aimed directly at Islamic supremacists operating DEEP within America’s shores.

And the likes of Dearborn’s Islamists indeed have friends in high places – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/14/hollywood-liberals-their-cozy-left-wing-political-relationships-protecting-islamic-interests-huma-abedin-plays-ben-affleck-like-a-fiddle-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ , making it that much harder for freedom-loving Americans to stop their surge.

Nevertheless, despite their leftist enablers, the only option for survival is to fight against them – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/05/u-s-movie-makers-corporate-heads-police-too-dancing-to-islamic-edicts-where-is-the-west-headed-addendum-to-western-dhimmis-bow-again-to-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ , otherwise Americans will find themselves dancing to their Islamic edicts.

Guaranteed.

So is it any wonder that a Canadian ‘Jewish man was arrested for bringing his dog to anti-Israel rally’? – http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2012/08/20120820-213344.html. This is precisely what happens when Islamists run amok.

Leapfrogging onto the Christian community, here’s what happens when submission is unopposed – ‘AFLC Files Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit in Defense of Christians Stoned by Muslims at Arab Festival in Dearborn, Michigan’

http://www.americanfreedomlawcenter.org/home/45/aflc-files-federal-civil-rights-lawsuit-in-defense-of-christians-stoned-by-muslims-at-arab-festival-in-dearborn-michigan.html

Adding humiliation atop outrage, the ever incisive Daniel Greenfield, AKA Sultan Knish, tells his personal tale. You can’t make this crap up…wake me up from our western nightmare!

‘Israeli Flags Now Illegal in Dearbornistan’

October 15, 2012 By 

First, Christians were banned in Dearbornistan. Now, it’s Jews who are illegal. Why not just declare the place an outpost of Saudi Arabia and be done with the whole business.

“On 9-14-2012, Dearborn Fordson High School principal called the police on me for driving with 2 Israeli flags on my truck.

When the students began their assault he rolled down his window asking them to stop. After they pulled him over the police used the rolled down window as a pretext to accuse him of instigating the altercation.  While being questioned by the police in front of the high school the reader received death threats. The police denied hearing them though the individuals involved were only a few feet away.

“The Dearborn police were one car behind me when this student threw a bottle on my windshield. The police did not stop the student, but instead stopped me for 30 minutes asking me why I would display Israeli flags on my truck.”

This is how hellholes like Malmo get started. When the law becomes a tool for enforcing Muslim prejudices, then equal rights go out the window and police lecture anyone attacked by Muslims on what they did to provoke the attack.

But it’s not just Dearborn. The consensus of our governing elites is that making a movie mocking Mohammed is a crime that deserves to be punished. So why not driving with an Israeli flag as well? Where do we draw the line? Anywhere Muslim violence tells us to.”

 http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/israeli-flags-now-illegal-in-dearbornistan/

Sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, people have to pick their battles. Thereby, not all incidents are fight-worthy. Thus, a litmus test must be drawn up, assessing whether or not ones energy is best expended here or there, or not at all.

Therefore, a patriot must ask: what liberties are being trampled upon by said actions, or lack thereof? Once answered, one has to also consider the true nature/mindset of said violators.

Now this blogger can state with 100% assurance what works, and what doesn’t, particularly when beating back Islamic supremacists. The main ingredients to remember are: NEVER show fear; NEVER back down; and NEVER give them an inch of your freedoms.

And make NO mistake, Dearbornistan is nearly completely ruled by Islamic mandates, even down to Shariah compliance – or else. 

Therefore, here’s a thought experiment: let us suppose (in the best case scenario) that a bus load of “good ole boys” (know this crowd quite well…but let us not digress) decides to take a scenic ride to Dearbornistan, simply to soak in some local culture/vibe. But in the midst of their travels they get off the bus; stretch their legs; hoist scores of American flags; recite a Christian prayer of choice; and finish off by reciting the Constitution.

Beautiful. It’s (still) a free country, isn’t it?

Taken a step further…meandering down the byways and highways…crowds of Islamists ( in the U.S.A. ! ) start threatening the aforementioned patriots, expecting they too will back down. Does anyone think that this would happen?

Doubtful. 

Imagine, if you will, a busload of patriots turning up at the latest anti-semitic/anti-Zionist hate fest, but this time nearby the Islamist-in-Chief’s ‘nabe – http://frontpagemag.com/2012/ryan-mauro/destroy-israel-conference-comes-to-illinois/. Would the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s attendees pause and take notice?

Not likely, unless put on notice: cease and desist.

To effectuate the above “wish list” scenarios, American patriots have to stop thinking like good neighbors, and start acting like guys from Middle America, taking a page out of the “good ole boy’s” playbooks.

ATTENTION: “rednecks/bitter clingers/lock and load” sorts – Islamists in “any town USA” need some old fashioned lessons, on what it means to be a patriotic American. Of course, give them a chance to back off their Islamic high horse, if not….

As leftists are wont to opine – FAIR IS FAIR.

First they came for the Saturday people…then the Sunday people.

Gunning For Tea Party Activists…Enlisting U.S. Army To Hunt/Identify Them…Addendum To: Warning All Patriotic Americans…The Enemy Is You…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The latest news should shock even the most jaded American patriots, but somehow the suspicion is it won’t. That ship has sailed.

This blog has brought forward a dastardly ‘people’s indictment’, against  the misuse/abuse of DHS, under the reign of the Thug-in-Chief. In fact, previous commentaries reveal the depth of their plans; targeted at those whose sole ‘crime’ is to believe in the Constitutional right to bear arms, and their vocal expressions of patriotic principles, an inherent right under any democracy.

Where do they think they are, in a banana republic? Are they mirroring Hugo’s goon squads…the dictator-in-chief…who mugged with the Radical-in-Chief on several occasions? You know, the same El Presidente that the POTUS called to congratulate on his latest electoral ‘win’.

In concert with the above factoids, the DHS is being used as a cover to effectuate political aims – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/08/the-politicizing-of-dhs-rendering-it-ineffective-a-danger-to-national-security-addendum-to-black-hawks-swirling-over-u-s-cities-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Most glaringly, patriotic Americans are subliminally tarred as ‘terrorists’ and a danger to the American way of life – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/21/warning-all-patriotic-americans-the-enemy-is-you-at-least-according-to-dhs-addendum-to-black-hawks-swirling-over-u-s-cities-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/Oh really?

Topping off their anti-American plans, Black Hawks can be found swirling over many U.S. cities, at the same time that inordinate amounts of ammo are being purchased too. What for? –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/05/black-hawks-swirling-over-us-cities-dhs-stockpiling-inordinate-amount-of-ammo-who-is-their-targetaddendum-to-red-hot-warning-from-north-east-intelligence-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Ironically, soldiers who openly express patriotic leanings are also in their cross hairs – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/03/the-hunt-against-vets-excluding-muslim-servicemen-is-the-first-path-to-disarming-patriotic-americans-the-game-plan-to-label-right-wing-citizens-as-domestic-terrorists-dave-gaubatz-spills/. Ungrateful bastards.

Thus, a rational question becomes – what’s the end game? Could it be that the disarming of the public, and the shredding of their Constitutional right to bear arms, is their goal? –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/29/under-what-circumstancespretexts-will-disarming-american-citizens-happen-how-will-they-accomplish-it-adina-kutnicki/Yup.

Alas, the above are just a mere sampling, but substantive linkages to their latest putsch against patriotic Americans!

‘Tea Party “Terrorists” Now On U.S. Army Kill List?’

OCTOBER 13, 2012 BY 

Tea Party SC Tea Party “Terrorists” now on U.S. Army kill list?

A retired Army colonel and a professor of history at the University of Kansas have co-written an article instructing the U.S. Army how to properly destroy “…extremist militia [insurgents] motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement.”

Colonel Kevin Benson, who teaches modern warfare to soldiers at the University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Ft. Leavenworth and Associate Professor Jennifer Weber have created a scenario in which activists under the influence of that apogee of American terrorism—Tea Party members—“…take over the government of Darlington, South Carolina, occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council, and placing the mayor under house arrest.”

How exactly do the authors explain such a thing happening?  “After a change in control of the White House and Congress in 2012, the governing party cuts off all funding that had been dedicated to boosting the economy or toward relief.” In short, those evil, rich Republicans have cruelly separated the American public from all of the “free” money and services Big Brother has provided over the past several decades. As a result, “a high-profile and vocal minority has directed the public’s fear and frustration at nonwhites and immigrants.” For as we all know, “after almost ten years of race-baiting and immigrant-bashing by right-wing demagogues, nearly one in five Americans reports being vehemently opposed to immigration, legal or illegal, and even U.S.-born nonwhites have become occasional targets for mobs of angry whites.”

Of course, Benson and Weber make it clear that “mainstream” Americans and politicians react quite negatively to the aggression of the radical right. The insurgents, however, “…invoke the Declaration of Independence and argue that the current form of the federal government is not deriving its ‘just powers from the consent of the governed’…” As a result, they are joined in their maniacal overthrow of the true government by “…other tea party groups, militias, racist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, anti-immigrant associations such as the Minutemen, and other right-wing groups.”

The name of this extraordinary piece of work is “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future”. And needless to say, its publication has created something of a stir among rational, non-impaired thinkers across the nation. Most ask a very pointed question: Why are conservatives targeted as the coming threat to the social and political order of the United States rather than Islamic terrorists or members of the radical left? Shouldn’t those who have already proven themselves eager participants in the art of murder and insurrection be the first to command the attention of law enforcement, whether public or military?

Well not if we remember the published warnings of Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security. According to Janet Napolitano and her boss, the REAL danger emanates from the:

“Extreme right-wing: groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack and is either lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”

According to much of the Department’s description of would-be terrorists, this nation’s Founders would have been in real trouble with the Obama Regime!

Please take the time to read the 5 page, Full Spectrum article of Benson and Weber. It is a chilling reminder of just how important the November election really is.”

http://www.westernjournalism.com/tea-party-terrorists-now-on-u-s-army-kill-list/

FULL DISCLOSURE: This American-Israeli takes particular umbrage at the targeting of the Tea Party…being a member ( in absentia ) and all. Not one to take threats lying down, thus, counting on fellow patriots to stay vigilant.

Whatever works.

Is The Leftist Media – More or Less – Having Buyer’s Remorse…Regarding ‘The One’? Adina Kutnicki

NEWSFLASH: Piercing the leftist narrative regarding ‘The One’. Newsweek columnist bares his buyer’s remorse…seeks to return the lemon he voted for.

Delicious. But most significantly…..

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal.The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CDA243.669064E0

“I Too Have Become Disillusioned.”

By Matt Patterson (Newsweek columnist – opinion writer)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008speeches)

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track.) But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.”

 Maybe pigs do fly!!

 

 

 

 

Hollywood Liberals & Their Cozy Left Wing Political Relationships: Protecting Islamic Interests…Huma Abedin ‘Plays’ Ben Affleck Like A Fiddle…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Just when you thought that the far left’s manipulations – on behalf of their Islamic overlords/censors – reached their highest level of complicity, along comes Ben Affleck and the opening of his thriller. ‘Argo’ is inarguably a historical hit job.

While his directorial oversight is worthy of good reviews, there is so much more here than meets the cinematic eye. Much more.

To understand the insidious symbiosis, between Hollywood and political elites,  (almost always operating from the left) one has to view them as incestuous relations between ideological cousins. Sticky and dangerous.

Think about all the “stories” you may have heard about the goings on among Appalachian kinfolk, and the above is so much worse. (BTW, this blogger knows some “good ole” boys from the “hollers”, and has only good things to say about them…salt of the earth…but never mind…) Better yet, take what you know about the ACTUAL inbreeding between Arab families/tribes and consider the actual results – rampant genetic mutations, and too many mental defects to list – http://clashdaily.com/2013/05/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/.

The above could very well (at least partially ) explain their non-quenchable inter-tribal warfare; family rivalry on steroids! Regardless, westerners are not responsible for the bedding patterns of much of the Arab world. It’s their internal garbage, which spills over into the wider world, which should concern us all. Yes, it should.

Now, separate out actual blood lines, but leave in its stead the main reason why Hollyweird’s limousine liberals do the bidding of their leftist political “cousins”.  One holds the keys to the access of authentic power levers; the other is courted for their ability to raise mega cash. A match made within the bowels of ideological incest, and with both gorging off the other – Dracula-like.

 As an aside, although Affleck publicly admits to his admiration for the “spook” community  (something which is verboten in far left circles…assisting the military industrial complex…and all that crap), he is oblivious – or complicit, it is hard to know – to the rewriting of history.

In plain parlance, the story he weaves re the motives of Islamic revolutionaries in Iran, during their historical takeover in 1979 and their attack on the American embassy ( shades of Libya…and the rewriting from the Islamist-in-Chief, not unlike his like-minded twin, Jimmy, the peanut farmer, Carter ) smacks of talking points from the other side.  Incredibly, instead of directing the viewers towards the heart of the matter – Islamic jihad on behalf of Allah – he uses a “video/cartoon” defense, sort of like a “twinkie” defense, or the “dog ate my homework”.

Gee whiz.

In the same mendacious manner, in which the Islamist-in-Chief (and his surrogates)  blamed American murders in Libya on a video ( which no one had seen! ), Affleck redirects the viewers to the Shah of Iran. To be sure, the Shah ruled with an iron grip, but at least Islamists were kept at bay, and his eyes were westward.

Mubarak redux.

At this grave juncture in history let’s stop pussyfooting around, lying to ourselves  (and the world ) that anyone but a ‘strongman’ can tame the Arab masses. It can’t be done.This is precisely why it is a fool’s errand to implant/import western democracy into the ever warring tribal lands of the Middle East. Come live in my ‘hood for a while, then see what (many) Israelis realize, even though some are loathe to admit it.

Besides, purple finger markings from casting ballots ( recall, the incessant tv images of Iraqis holding up purple fingers ) are hardly the main underpinnings of democracy. Democratic principles via foundational moorings, shored up by civil society constructs comes BEFORE voting.

Back to Affleck’s Argo.

Enter Huma Abedin, Deputy COS to Hillary Clinton, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia diva, featured so prominently at this blog. Don’t be surprised, she deserves her top billing status. Humala, nowhere to run…nowhere to hide, is as intertwined with the Muslim Brotherhood like a pig is to his shit, and a dog is to his fleas. That close. The details are here – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/update-huma-abedins-familial-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood-tree-gains-another-root-addendum-to-huma-abedin-deputy-cos-to-hillary-clinton-inextricably-tied-to-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood/.

But, why is she being featured – yet again! –  and with Benny boy no less? Here’s the scoop & the poop – 

‘Ben Affleck: Huma Abedin a ‘close friend’ who was ‘instrumental’ in making of ‘Argo’

“Hollywood actor / director Ben Affleck premiered his new film – ‘Argo’ – in Washington, D.C. and in attendance was none other than Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Affleck revealed that the controversial figure had a hand in making the film.

Via POLITICO:

Former Rep. Anthony Weiner and his wife, Huma Abedin, made an appearance at the D.C. premiere of “Argo” on Wednesday. The couple stopped by the screening after a reception for the film, which chronicles the Iran hostage crisis, at the Canadian Embassy.

A few years ago, Weiner advised Ben Affleck — the director and star of “Argo” – on his political role in “State of Play.” But it was actually Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who helped Affleck with this movie, the actor said.

“Huma is a really close friend of mine,” Affleck explained on the red carpet. “In fact, Huma — the reason why she’s here — is she wasinstrumental in helping us shoot the State Department. As you know, we shot at the real State Department. We never would have had any of that stuff in our research [otherwise]. …Huma was enormously helpful, and obviously we invited her and she brought her husband. I look forward to seeing him.”

The Daily Mail referred to Abedin’s influence on the film as one that involved giving Affleck ‘guidance on State Department protocol’.

Some might remember that a few months ago, the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank likened Abedin to a gopher for Hillary who picks out ‘handbags’.

MacLeans’ Savage Washington reported on a couple of other interesting figures who were in attendance:

CIA director David Petraeus was there, as well as Sen. Chris Dodd,Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, to name a few. Also in attendance were the usual assortment of former ambassadors and other Friends of Canada.

Earlier this year, we reported on Huma Abedin’s sister (Heba Abedin)contributing $2300 to the Chris Dodd Presidential campaign in 2007.

Heba and Huma served together for years on the Editorial Board of the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), which has significant connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

General Petraeus and Affleck appear to have developed a bit of a relationship during the making of the film.”

http://www.shoebat.com/2012/10/12/ben-affleck-huma-abedin-a-close-friend-who-was-instrumental-in-making-of-argo/ – a good review here too from Pajamasmedia – http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2012/10/12/does-argo-put-enough-islamic-in-the-revolution/

Does anyone, at least without mush for brains, believe that Abedin was front and center at his premier out of pure friendship? Of course not. As indicated above, she was his ADVISER on the film! Now, far be it to peddle conspiracy theories ( it is not as if there aren’t enough true horrors to angst over), but she is the Obama regime’s point woman, via the Islamist-bent State Department.

Pray tell, but why this theatrical gig?

Adding to the muck is the entrance of General Petreaus, current CIA Director, also front and center at the screening. Huh?

“MacLeans’ Savage Washington reported on a couple of other interesting figures who were in attendance:

CIA director David Petraeus was there, as well as Sen. Chris Dodd,Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, to name a few. Also in attendance were the usual assortment of former ambassadors and other Friends of Canada.”

What the hell is going on? Don’t leaders of the world’s super power have more important things to do, than preview the opening of Benny boy’s latest directorial flick? Is this blogger losing her mojo, or perhaps her mind, even considering such questions.

Mea culpa. Not.

And when one truly understands how deep the incest runs, between Hollywood’s left & their political handlers, their collusion becomes clear –http://www.shoebat.com/2012/10/13/ben-affleck-conflict-of-interest-at-state-department/.

Does framing the narrative resonate? 

If ones antenna isn’t raised enough, consider the following ( out of a mega list ) encroachment of Islamic intimidation; this time aimed at a Mayor in Maine, courtesy of Obama’s surrogates.

Coincidence? Is the moon made of cream cheese?

‘Maine Mayor Under Fire for Telling Truth About Muslim Immigrants (VIDEO)’

Where will the above – and so much more – lead to? At the very least, the death kneel of western freedoms and an untold number of dead westerners. Its numbers will pale in comparison to the previous big wars – if westerners don’t start fighting back!
To be exact, the patriot’s struggle is twofold: against the bowed leadership, as well as the boot of Islam.There are NO easy answers, but there is NO other option, unless submission is your path of least resistance.
You still have a choice – at least for now.

 

Islamic Wildfires Coming Full Circle: To A U.S. Forest Near You. Addendum To : Jihad Via Arson…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those who ascribe good intentions to all humanity haven’t come in contact with the carnage of jihadists; handiwork of the Islamic devil.

Ignoring cultural differences is akin to living in a netherworld, whether imposed through outside pressures, or ones own internal ignorance. Either way, this rosy colored worldview pretends that evil is good; darkness is light; fantasy is reality; and everything in between is nothing more than shades of gray. PC insanity run amok, the rivers of blood notwithstanding.

How many westerners understand the depth of their plans to destroy us? How many have witnessed – at the very least on television – their beloved land torched by Islamic arsonists? This blogger has….and shouting at a tv screen can only work for so long!

There is something to be said for those who channel said outrage outwardly, attempting to turn the tables, thus blaring a HUGE spotlight on their tormentors.

In this regard, exposing their plans, as well as their carnage, is one such way to “even” the playing field, at least as a “war” cry to like-minded patriots. The following are some opening shots:

‘Jihad Via Arson…As Fires Rage…Proven Suspicious…’- https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/18/jihad-via-arson-as-fires-rage-provensuspicious-too-here-in-israel-there-in-the-us-a-fatwa-on-their-heads-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-23/, gives a window into their underbelly, revealing a new method to wage jihad against the west.

Therefore, it is imperative to ‘Repeat Until The Cows Come Home:There Is NO Moderate Islam’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/repeat-until-the-cows-come-home-there-is-no-moderate-islam-period-addendum-to-what-the-west-in-general-and-its-leaders-in-particular-know-about-islam-can-fill-less-than-a-thimble-m/.

As such, Northeast Intelligence Network catches the public up to speed too – ‘Wildfires: We’ve been warning about them since 2003’

3 October 2012:  Since 2003, the Northeast Intelligence Network has been warning that Islamic terrorists living in the United States and sympathetic to the objectives of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, have been posting instructions to destroy the U.S. from within. A “simple” and inexpensive way to cause great and costly calamities to the U.S. is by setting forest fires, especially in drought-ravaged areas. In May 2003, we reported that postings appeared on several password-protected forums that the California wildfires were started by members of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.  An FBI memo published in June 2003 carried identical warnings.

Following those warnings, we reported that “verified intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists had a hand in some of the existing fires in southern California that have already engulfed over 1/2 million acres.”

In May 2003, we reported that postings appeared on several password-protected forums that the California wildfires were started by members of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.  An FBI memo published in June 2003 carried identical warnings.

Following those warnings, we reported that “verified intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists had a hand in some of the existing fires in southern California that have already engulfed over 1/2 million acres.”

Saturday, 12 July 2003: PHOENIX, Arizona  – The FBI  alerted law enforcement agencies last month that an Al Qaeda terrorist now in detention had talked of masterminding a plot to set a series of devastating forest fires around the western United States. Source: Fox News.

Internet Intercept 26 October 2003:

“Allah’s soldiers will devastate America by its burning…this is nothing but the start of the punishment assisted by Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds….These are the new fires different from the normal as Ramadan starts.”

Other truncated messages from September 2003:

Oh Allah support the fighters everywhere, and hasten your support of them Oh Allah… Oh Allah… ignite the land a fire from below the feet of the Crusaders and cunning Zionists… Our warnings continued through 2010, at which time it appeared that the Department of Homeland Security would have had enough intelligence gathered on the plans of Muslim terror suspects living here in the U.S. Today, al Qaeda is being blamed for Europe-wide forest fires, as the head of Russia’s Federal Security Service claimed they were set by arsonists as part of the group’s low-cost attack strategy.”

Previous reports: 11 February 2009: Terrorist “chatter:” Forest Fires 26 October 2007:  Photography, surveillance, FBI warnings preceded California wildfires 25 October 2007:  Domestic Terrorism? California arson fires easier than hijacking planes

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/6931

At the end of this death dance, between the west and Islamic barbarians, one will come out the winner, therefore, the other side will naturally have to surrender/submit.

So the basic questions for the west are: what methods are they willing to utilize in order to protect their way of life, both inside and outside their borders? How far are they willing to go to implement said safeguards?

In other words, are westerners willing to round up the enemy within – those who are of the same bent as the arsonists ( think: Dearbornistan, then onto Islamberg, and on and on…) – knowing full well that the international community will scream foul? 

Cards on the table.

Westerners who cherish life and liberty must decide: what (temporary) lines, however uncomfortable, are they willing to cross to serve their national interests? Is going down in flames     (LITERALLY) a price they are willing to pay, in order to take the “high road”?

The answers should be clear. NO guilt allowed, at least at this blog. War is hell and nice guys finish last!

Need a rallying cry? Crank it up  – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZQHSDkq_4A

The Liar-In-Chief…& His Many Tall Tells…End Game : Purposefully Tearing The U.S. From Its Constitutional Roots…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

There is a world of difference between individuals who engage in “white lies”  (though an attempt to suppress the urge is a laudable goal), and people who habitually tell tall tales. 

Besides, is there anyone who hasn’t told their loved one ( especially men to their wives/girlfriends ) that they look good in this or that, preferring not to insult their feelings? Personally, would rather be told the truth before heading out in public – only suffering momentary embarrassment – but many prefer to see what they want to see. As is said, different strokes for different folks; beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and really only skin deep.

Be that as it may, in relation to the leader of the free world, there is NO higher commodity – when electing a leader – than their ability to tell the truth. This dare not be confused with leaking national secrets (and most conveniently), sacrificed on the altar of “transparency”. The POTUS has a penchant for such “truth telling”, and he is aided and abetted by media lapdogs. A perversion of truth and patriotism…traits wholly absent in the Obama regime.

Tragic….and herein lies the crux. This blog is rife with supportive evidence which attests to the Radical-in-Chief’s inability to relate to – thereby value – truthfulness. Character? What’s that? Moral compass? Just for chumps.  

Starting with his “down low” lifestyle; coupled with his revolutionary friendships, from knee high to a grasshopper; exhibited through his 4 year wreckage of “transformation and change”; few can argue that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is anything, but an anti-American fraud – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/03/the-down-low-potus-and-rev-wrights-guiding-hand-trinity-churchs-many-secrets-stripped-naked-addendum-to-mysterious-deaths-never-far-from-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutn/. An exceedingly dangerous man.

So, atop the wreckage already visible, more keeps piling up. Does this Poser-in-Chief even know how to step off his merry-go-round of lies, even if the situation warrants him to? Have no idea. Regardless, he can spin, weave, bob and dodge – like liars always do – but many are hot on his trail, thanks to fellow bloggers and alternative media types. Enter…the latest charge sheets:

Still believe Obama got Osama ? Think again – http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/hey-obama-didnt-get-bin-laden/. The following are some more fact checks exposing the Liar-in-Chief:

‘FACT CHECK: LABOR SECRETARY SOLIS MISLEADS ON JOBS REVISIONS’

by JOEL B. POLLAK

“Suspicion about the federal government’s September jobs report has fallen on Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, who appeared on CNBC this morning and defended the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), claiming–falsely–that upward revisions of 86,000 jobs were from the private sector. In fact, the new number is entirely accounted for by upwards revisions to state and federal government payrolls.

The BLS reported that while only 114,000 jobs were created in September–which would have translated into a rise in unemployment from 8.1% to 8.2%–the unemployment rate fell dramatically to 7.8%. That unusual drop is the fastest in nearly three decades, and was unexpected even in the rosiest predictions. One reason for the rise was an upward revision of 86,000 to the July and August jobs numbers–all of which came from a 91,000 increase in the estimate of public sector jobs. Private sector job estimates were actually revised downward by 5,000. In addition, the BLS reported a large rise in the number of part-time jobs, adding 600,000 jobs to the total–a dramatic increase of 7.5%, not explained by any other economic indicators–and raising questions about whether the government had changed the way it counted part-time workers. Solis was adamant today in defending both the revisions and the BLS’s methodology for counting part-time workers–relying largely on the upwards revisions for July and August jobs (emphasis added):

CNBC: We’re getting bombarded by people who do not believe the number. They believe this number was fixed and typed to coincide with Election Day. What do you say to them?…I’ll rephrase the question. A lot of people do not believe the 7.8 number. They believe that somehow BLS fixed this to coincide with the election cycle. What is labor’s response? Solis: You know, I’m insulted when I hear that because we have a very professional, civil service organization where you have top, top economists that work at the BLS. They’ve been doing these calculations. These are — these are our best trained and best-skilled individuals working in the BLS, and it’s really ludicrous to hear that kind of statement, and I say that because just look at the — we have to look at what happens across the board, not just in one month, but look what happened in the last two months. We also saw revisions there upwards of 86,000 additional jobs added and this brings us now to 5.2 million private sector jobs across the board, we saw 104 private sector jobs created…. CNBC: Before I let you go, you say skepticism over the numbers are ludicrous. You say you’re insulted. Is there a danger, you believe, when large sections was country don’t believe the data. Not that it’s ever been considered gospel, but when you have disbelief how much danger is embedded in that? Solis: I will tell you that we look at each report differently. We just saw revisions for the last two months and this happens. I mean, these are estimates that obviously, the BLS puts out. They do the best calculation, using the best measurements and tools and we’ve been using them for the past 70 years. We haven’t changed anything and the information that I received is given to me by our professional, civil service staff in the BLS.

Note that Solis describes the 86,000 upward revision as if it were an increase in private sector jobs, though in fact the increase came entirely from revisions to public sector payrolls by cash-strapped federal and state governments. Instead of shedding jobs, as previously claimed, governments have been adding jobs.”

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/05/Suspicion-Falls-on-Labor-Secretary-Solis-as-Jobs-Numbers-Questioned –

This too via Canada Free Press, re the fudging of the numbers- 

‘Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS & Parkinson’s Law’ – http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50146.

Knowing a thing or two about what happens to regular folks who cook their financial books ( see https://adinakutnicki.com/about/ ), and the iron fist brought down by the IRS when caught ( except, if one supports Islamic or leftist causes, but let’s not digress… ), what should be the penalty for the most lawbreaking regime in U.S. history? 

Let the citizens decide.

NOT only that, but the same lawbreakers who trot out the Sec of Labor to tell financial tall tales, are the same deviants who abuse the weight of the IRS for their personal vendettas – see – WND EXCLUSIVE -‘COLUMBIA CLASSMATE: OBAMA USING IRS TO PUNISH ME’ – Outspoken 2008 VP candidate claims prez trying to ‘silence critics’ –http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/columbia-classmate-obama-using-irs-to-punish-me/.

Moreover, with all the lies swirling around the Thief-in-Chief, and his most recent miraculous job numbers, one can be forgiven if  ‘PaytoPlay’ – Chicago’s own version of a “political mafia” – got lost in the shuffle. Have no fear. There are those who keep abreast.

‘Hugo Floriani, Investigative Reporter, Illinois PaytoPlay’

“Previous Illinois PaytoPlay (IP2P) articles have proposed that the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO), once led by former U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, timed the arrest of former Governor Rod “Blago” Blagojevich in order to prevent persons representing Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. from paying a bribe to Blago in exchange for Blago appointing J.J., Jr. as the new U.S. Senator for the seat vacated by recently-elected President Barack Obama.

A recent article in World Net Daily, written by best-selling author Jerome Corsi entitled “Jesse Jackson, Wright ‘arranged’ Obama marriage,” adds credibility to what IP2P has alleged; namely,that the timing of Blago’s arrest was not motivated by a desire to stop a “crime spree,” but was meant to save J.J., Jr., from being complicit in the crime associated with purchasing a Senate seat. The primary assertion of Corsi’s article is this: “As a young single woman, Michelle Robinson was a fixture in the home of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, who along with Rev. Jeremiah Wright ‘arranged’ her marriage to Barack Obama, according to sources in Chicago who know the couple. ‘If you want to understand Michelle Obama, you’ve got to go back to Jesse Jackson, a woman called “Robyn” for this article told WND. Robyn, who spent several years working for Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition, explained to a WND investigator in Chicago that Michelle Obama ‘just about grew up in Jesse Jackson’s home.’ ‘Jesse should have charged her rent and board for the amount of time she spent in his home instead of her own,’ she said.”

This article is the second in a series. In the first installment, Corsi claimed that Obama was part of an “underground subculture in the black community known as Down Low, comprised largely of men who secretly engage in homosexual activity while living ‘straight’ lives in public.”  And, that Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church was a facilitation center for this underground subculture.

Putting that assertion aside, the close relationship between Michelle Robinson and the Jackson family adds weight to IP2P’s suggestion that the newly elected President would have taken all necessary steps to protect J.J., Jr., who was not only the Co-Chair of his Presidential Campaign Committee, but also a member of a family with a long and close personal relationship with Michelle Obama.

Then there’s also the possibility that J.J., Jr. would be knowledgeable of Barack Obama’s alleged involvement in the “Down Low” community.” http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2012/10/05/as-obamas-cover-story-comes-down-the-curtain-goes-up-on-the-usaos-cover-up-of-j-j-jr-s-role-in-the-blago-story/.

Oh no…the “down low” saga keeps bubbling to the fore. Can’t keep the truth from rearing its ugly head. Sick and tired…of being sick and tired? Not done yet.

Do you recall this commentary on “Uncle Frank”, and his noteworthy influence on the Prez? No worries. Here’s a recap – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/.

Onto “The One’s” latest shenanigans…

‘WHY WAS OBAMA‘S AUDIO BOOK VERSION OF ’DREAMS FROM MY FATHER’ PURGED OF ALL REFERENCES TO COMMUNIST MENTOR?’

“You might recall TheBlaze’s series of reports on Dr. Paul Kengor’s powerful book, “The Communist,” which offered a detailed account of the Communist Party ties of President Obama’s longtime mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.

“Frank,” as he is referred to in Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father,” is mentioned multiple times in the print edition of the president’s book, however, Kengor now reveals that all references to “Frank” were purged from the volume’s abridged audio version. It’s an observation that was first broached, albeit very briefly, by Jack Cashill in a July article. And since then, the scrubbing has gone unnoticed.

Until now. “Frank” — whose influence Kengor asserts was key to the fledgling politician and that the eccentric activist appears in “each mile-marker” of Obama’s path from Hawaii to the halls of Washington, D.C. — is mentioned no less than 22 times by name in “Dreams From My Father” and is referenced via pronouns numerous other times throughout the book. But while listening to the audio version recently, Kengor noticed “Frank” had disappeared. He re-listened to the entire audio book on Tuesday afternoon and compared it to the unabridged memoir. “Every reference to ‘Frank’ everywhere in the book, from every section—and there are many of them—are gone,” Kengor told TheBlaze in an email. The omissions are important because a review of the Random House website reveals that all audio versions of “Dreams,” along with Obama’s subsequent book, “The Audacity of Hope,” are only available in the abridged format.

While the Obama campaign could certainly argue that during the editing process many excerpts, not just the ones referencing Frank, were eliminated from the audio version for brevity, some might find it odd that such an important figure in the president’s life would have been relegated to the cutting room floor. It is also important to note that the audio version of “Dreams” was released in 2005, shortly after Obama’s now-infamous 2004 speech at the Democratic National Convention — a speech which made it fairly clear that the aspiring politician would indeed rise to prominence on the national stage one day.

Back in 1994, when the original text version of “Dreams” was released, Obama was a relative “nobody,” hence his memoir, complete with references to a seemingly obscure character named “Frank” would hardly have been on the public’s radar. Given that the president himself narrated the audio version of “Dreams,” approved the final edits and even won a Grammy award for his efforts leaves little room for doubt that Obama is aware, if not directly responsible, for the omissions.

In turn, the fact that the audio book appears to have been sanitized of the myriad references to Obama’s controversial mentor strikes Kengor as being in no way coincidental. “It’s amazing to read along the text as you listen to the audio, and see and hear everything word for word, paragraph after paragraph, line after line, page after page, and then suddenly—wham, boom!—it skips a paragraph or line or page that just happened to mention “Frank” in the original,” Kengor added. It’s almost creepy, chilling to see……..”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/why-would-obamas-audio-book-version-of-dreams-from-my-father-have-been-purged-of-all-references-to-communist-mentor/….read the whole thing…once upon a (book’s) time there was an “Uncle Frank”….and suddenly…erased. Beyond creepy.

Whoppers are fungible, until they no longer are. They always have a way of ensnaring the culprits, but not always in time to save the victims. In this regard, the Liar-in-Chief is running the biggest criminal enterprise in U.S. history. Way past time to uproot him and his (all too eager) surrogates.

Revenge never smelled so sweet.