DOMESTIC TERRORIST,BILL AYERS,ENTERS THROUGH OBAMA’s “BACK DOOR”:DEBORAH LEFF VETS PRESIDENTIAL CLEMENCIES! HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

REGARDLESS of this and that spin from the radical left’s quarters – backing up the POTUS’s tall tale, that domestic terrorist Bill Ayers “was just some guy who lived in Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s neighborhood”  well, put said lie in the (mental) garbage heap. Burn it. More on that later…

What is most significant is where the truth really lies, demonstrating exactly how close they still ! are. Now, for the requisite back-up ammunition, look no further:

Bill Ayers, the foremost leader of the Weathermen “is in his third decade as a national leader in the movement to radicalize the educational training of schoolteachers”. His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, a top leader too “is a professor of law at Northwestern and a high-ranking officer in the American Bar Association.” Eleanor Raskin (ne Stein) “is a law professor at S.U.N.Y Albany and, astonishingly, a NYS administrative law judge”. Jeff Jones “currently heads the New York-based Apollo Alliance, a highly influential coalition of labor leaders and environmentalists, and was responsible for drafting President Obama’s 2009 Recovery Act.”

The list of “respectable” cover, of other “notables” in the Weathermen, is equally impressive. Through a stringently planned operational “stealth jihad”, yesteryear’s Weathermen have returned, fully primed to carry out their original goal — the “transformation” of Amerika. Most significantly, they subvert the national interest from a distinctly dangerous vantage point. They are currently ensconced in some of the most powerful positions in academia and political life. The only difference is, this time they are dressed in “capitalist” garb, not only in their clothing choices, but in the wealth they have accumulated, paradoxically, through joining the “establishment”. Who said one can’t enrich oneself, but at the same time deny the masses/proletariat said wealth potential? Highly dangerous in their bomb-making days, their capacity to cripple America, sans firing actual weaponry is that much greater at this critical juncture in time. Deeply involved in the “transformation” process, as promised by President Obama, many of them working inside the executive branch, while others operate through progressive think tanks, they want nothing more than to distance themselves from their bloody past. Therefore, an omerta has descended from the denizens of the leftist media and their powerful organs.

obama-ayers

STUNNING REVEAL: DESPITE OBAMA CLAIMS THAT TERRORIST BILL AYERS NOT A CLOSE FRIEND, 1987 DOCUMENTS PROVE HE SOUGHT JOB FOR HIS BROTHER

The research conducted by this blogger for the above excerpted book review at American Thinker, Bringing Down America, revealed more than enough iron clad proof of their past relationship, as well as their present one. Why does this matter? More importantly, how could it not?

Proof One:

For the record, if NOT for Billy boys Ayer’s relationship with the POTUS, Common Core, aka ObamaCore, would be DOA! Isn’t that proof enough of their DEEP and abiding connection?

Proof Two:

How much more do we need to dig up, in order to demonstrate the duo’s – Ayer’s and Obama’s – red manifesto and their plans for America? 

Proof Three:

But you know what? Sometimes even the smug left-set gets tripped up, and this is one of those times:Ayers confirms his connection to Obama!

Therefore, as this site back-tracks into their relationship, the following becomes more than self explanatory. Self evident.

Enter: Eric Holder, a comrade-in-arms, his revolutionary (red/green)”legally-cloaked” hatchet man….as he appoints attorney Deborah Leff to take over the Office of the Pardon Attorney, the KEY link to connecting the Criminal-in-Chief to domestic terrorist Ayers, all those years ago. Full circle? You betcha!

DEBORAH LEFF TIED INTO AYERS & HIS WIFE, BERNADINE DOHRN!

Pardon me? Obama, Bill Ayers, crack cocaine

The new head of the U.S. pardon office, the official responsible for vetting federal inmate applicants for presidential grants of clemency, was the key point person in connecting President Obama to Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.

Also yesterday, the Justice Department announced six new guidelines for presidential pardon that will drastically broaden the number of those eligible among the prison population of non-violent offenders.

The new guidelines will make it easier to pardon offenders convicted of long drug offenses under laws that were stricter at the time of conviction.

Deputy Attorney General James Cole told reporters the new guidelines will focus on shortening sentences for those imprisoned under previous rules that saw little disparity between powdered cocaine and crack cocaine.

In 2010, Obama signed the Fair Sentencing Act, which lowered the amount of crack and powdered cocaine that would violate federal law from a 100:1 weight ratio to 18:1 while eliminating a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for possession of crack cocaine.

Major news media reports yesterday covered the new pardon guidelines as well as the appointment of Leff to her new position. However, entirely unreported was Leff’s previous relationships with Ayers and Obama as well as her anti-gun activism.

Leff served in the 1990’s as president of the Joyce Foundation, an education reform and anti-gun activist group.

Obama served on the Joyce Foundation board from 1994 to 2002. He was named to the board by Leff.

While Leff served as Joyce’s president, the non-profit provided critical start-up capital to the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, or CAC, an education reform group founded by Ayers.

Obama worked closely with Ayers at the CAC and was appointed in 1995 as chairman of the organization’s board.

Obama would later cite his CAC position as evidence of his qualification for public office.

Leff told the New York Times in 2008 that she was the one who first suggested Obama as Annenberg Challenge board chairman.

Obama worked closely with Ayers

Working at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge in 1995, Obama had a close relationship with Ayers, according to the CAC’s own archived records. The records also show Obama’s and Ayers’ foundation granted money to radical leftist activist causes.

News reports, archived records, interviews and Ayers’ own curriculum vitae document that Ayers was the founder of the CAC, which billed itself as a school-reform organization. Ayers also served as co-chairman of the Chicago School Reform Collaborative, one of the two operational arms of the CAC, from its formation in 1995 until 2000.

In response to a query by National Review Online writer Stanley Kurtz, the Obama 2008 presidential campaign issued a statement claiming Ayers was not involved with Obama’s “recruitment” to the CAC board. The statement said Leff and Patricia Albjerg Graham, who served as presidents of other foundations, recruited Obama.

But Kurtz reviewed the CAC archives at the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago, which houses CAC board meeting minutes and other documentation from the education foundation. He found that along with Leff and Graham, Ayers was in a working group of five people who assembled the initial board of the CAC, which hired Obama.

“Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval,” Kurtz wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.

Indeed, several articles in 1994 and 1995 in the Chicago Tribune detailed Ayers’ extensive work to secure the original grant for the CAC from a national education initiative by Ambassador Walter Annenberg, as well as Ayers’ molding of the CAC guidelines. It would have been unusual for Ayers not to have been involved in the selection of Obama.

Kurtz reported that the CAC archives demonstrated Obama and Ayers worked as a team to further the foundation’s agenda. Obama was in charge of fiscal matters, while Ayers’ position was more concerned with shaping educational policy.

The documents showed Ayers served as an ex-officio member of the board that Obama chaired through the CAC’s first year. Ayers also served on the board’s governance committee with Obama and worked with him to craft CAC bylaws, according to the documents.

Ayers made presentations to board meetings chaired by Obama. Ayers also spoke for the Chicago School Reform Collaborative before Obama’s board, while Obama periodically spoke for the board at meetings of the collaborative, the CAC documents reviewed by Kurtz show.

According to the documents, the CAC granted money to far-left causes, such as the now-defunct Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which, WND previously reported, had done work on behalf of Obama’s presidential campaign.

WND broke the story that while Obama chaired the board of the CAC, more than $600,000 was granted to an organization founded by Ayers and run by Mike Klonsky, a former top communist activist. Klonsky was leader of the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party, which was effectively recognized by China as the all-but-official U.S. Maoist party.

Confirms Kurtz: “Instead of funding schools directly, [the CAC] required schools to affiliate with ‘external partners,’ which actually got the money. Proposals from groups focused on math/science achievement were turned down. Instead CAC disbursed money through various far-left community organizers, such as ACORN.”

In 1995, the year Ayers founded the CAC, he gave an interview for author Ron Chepesiuk’s book “Sixties Radicals” in which Ayers stated, “I’m a radical, leftist, small ‘c’ communist.”

Kurtz notes that in his book “Teaching Toward Freedom,” Ayers states his goal is to “teach against oppression,” which Kurtz noted Ayers defines as “against America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”

The CAC, however, was not Obama’s only working relationship with the unrepentant terrorist, Ayers.

In a widely circulated article, WND first reported Obama served on the board of the Woods Fund, a liberal Chicago nonprofit, alongside Ayers from 1999 to Dec. 11, 2002, according to the Fund’s website. Tax filings show Obama received compensation of $6,000 per year for his service in 1999 and 2000.

The two appeared together as speakers at several public events, including a 1997 University of Chicago panel titled “Should a child ever be called a ‘super predator?’” and another panel for the University of Illinois in April 2002 titled “Intellectuals: Who needs them?”

Ayers has written about his involvement with the Weather Underground’s bombings of the New York City Police headquarters in 1970, the Capitol in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972.

“I don’t regret setting bombs. I feel we didn’t do enough,” Ayers told the New York Times in an interview released Sept. 11, 2001.

“Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon,” Ayers wrote in his memoirs, titled “Fugitive Days.” He continued with a disclaimer that he didn’t personally set the bombs but that his group set the explosives and planned the attack.

So, at a juncture in which a (once) great, glorious nation, the United States of America, is falling off a financial cliff; losing its hyper-power status; has become a laughingstock among western nations, and even within third rate powers, how worrisome is it that an unrepentant domestic terrorist, Billy Ayers, is still pulling America’s strings, in league with too many to enumerate revolutionary forces?

ATTENDING THE SAME REVOLUTIONARY “CHURCH”….YOU KNOW, THE 

DOWN LOW POTUS & REV WRIGHT’s GUIDING HANDS!

COMPLETE SURVEILLANCE OF AMERICA’s KIDDIES:COMMON CORE’s REAL AGENDA-TOTAL PENETRATION.LITERALLY. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

   

This site, since its inception, has been tracking the radical left’s grasp, specifically as it relates to their infiltration and penetration into America’s kiddies. Cretins. NOT a pretty picture. Downright creepy. Unconstitutional. Defacto anti-American.

In this regard, a repeated, extensive and exhaustive trail has tracked their thrust (jointly, and separately, with Shariah Law proponents serving as back benchers…really…) towards America’s children. The dangers are grave, but few have a clue. Their tentacles wrap around each and every child, as soon as they enter the school system.

However, we need to back track to the NSA’s unfettered spying, in order to realize how insidious their reach is, as the left’s clutches operate under Federal cover. The kiddies are part and parcel thereof.

Clutch One:

Like most well-oiled criminal operations, gathering as much background info as possible is critical to the job’s success. Ditto with accessing the kiddies:Aside From NSA’s Unfettered Domestic Spying, Obama’s Goons Are EYEING America’s Kiddies: How Are They Doing It? What Are They Up To? 

Clutch Two:

So once requisite questions re America’s children become clear – how/why they are eyeing the kiddies – the next step is to internalize what Obama Inc. is loathe to reveal in toto:The Snowden Affair & NSA’s Outing: What Is Obama Inc. REALLY Afraid Of? It’s not what you think.

Clutch Three:

Could their spying be any more insidious:The NSA:Caught, Dead To Rights!

Clutch Four:

Undoubtedly, in response to query number three, yes, it could be worse:NSA’s DOMESTIC SPYING PROCURES ALL PERSONAL DATA; BANKSTERS TARGET DOLLAR’S DESTRUCTION, GLOBAL “ORDER” REARRANGED!

Clutch Five:

Yet, those who think that the so-called “war on terror” necessitates blanket spying – you would be wrong:NSA’S MONSTROUS LIE DECODED:INVASION OF PRIVACY (DECEITFULLY) PREDICATED ON “WAR ON TERROR”!

Enter: common core and its entrapment of America’s children!

Common Core One:

Out of the gate, let us ask the most obvious question:Americans, Do You Know What Barack HUSSEIN Obama Wants Your Children To Learn? 

Common Core Two:

In the midst of all this madness, FOX’s psychiatrist-in-residence has this to offer:Radical-In-Chief TOXIC To America’s Children.The PURPOSEFUL Deconstruction Of America’s Exceptionalism! Can you believe? You better.

Common Core Three:

Alas, even though the official name is common core, rest assured, its most appropriate name is Obamacore:“OBAMACORE” TIED INTO DOMESTIC TERRORIST BILL AYERS: BRINGING DOWN AMERICA VIA THE KIDDIES!

Common Core Four:

But if readers are feeling hopeless, don’t despair: A WAR IS RAGING AGAINST “OBAMACORE”:30 STATES, PARENTS, TEACHERS ARE ON THE WARPATH!

Nevertheless, even though there is an upside, hidden within “Race to the Top”, a core component of common core belies traps and more traps. Be aware…wary…awake…

NSA OPS ‘WALK IN PARK’ NEXT TO PLANS TO TRACK KIDS

Watchdog says personal details about attitudes collected, measured, assessed

The spying on Americans by the National Security Agency and the Internal Revenue Service’s attacks on conservative groups are “like a walk in the park” compared to government plans to track school children, says a prominent national education researcher, analyst and Johns Hopkins-trained pediatrician.

Dr. Karen Effrem, president of the national watchdog group, Education Liberty Watch, is sounding an alarm about Common Core, the federal education standards that almost all states are adopting by accepting federal “Race to the Top” funding.

Under Common Core, Effrem said, students’ personal information increasingly is being collected, measured and assessed while the standards shift the focus away from academics and toward psychological training and testing of personal attitudes and behaviors.

Jane Robbins, senior fellow with the American Principles Project and a Common Core expert, shares Effrem’s concerns.

She said an agreement between a group that develops the Common Core tests and the DOE requires the consortium to give the DOE “complete access to any and all data collected at the state level.”

Robbins said parents will not be notified if personal information about their children is released, nor will they be told who gets it.

Common Core, Effrem said, creates “a womb-to-tomb dossier on kids and families” that includes between 300 and 400 different data points, such as parents’ voting status, religious affiliation, medical data, newborn screening and genetic data.

That personal student information is to be stored and shared between states in what amounts to a national database clearinghouse of information that Effrem said will follow children and may help determine where they work or go to school.

“It’s lifelong,” Effrem said. “And, it’s not just phone records or tax returns or that kind of thing. It’s literally their entire lives and everything about them and their families.”

Robbins added it is illegal for the federal government to establish a student database, “but they get around that by having the states do it.”

Effrem cited concerns about what these kinds of personal data collections will ultimately do to freedom in America.

“It’s going to be like what happened in the Soviet Union or China,” Effrem said. “Only it’s going to be with super computers; it’s going to be at the click of a button instead of on paper.”

Teachers as psychologists

Effrem said many Common Core standards and assessments will be used to collect data that go beyond academics to focus on student’s psychological attitudes, values and beliefs.

She points to documents from the National School Boards Association, the Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) and the U.S. Department of Education that promote teaching children beyond academics to focus on “non-cognitive” “21st Century skills” that include the disposition, social skills and behavior of children.

“Various elements of SEL can be found in nearly every state’s K-12 standards framework and in the Common Core State Standards for the English Language Arts,” states the National Association of State Boards of Education in an October 2013 paper, “From Practice to Policy.”

SEL (social emotional learning) is also starting to be incorporated in federal policies and initiatives, such as the Race to the Top, according to a 2013 CASEL report, “The Missing Piece, How Social and Emotional Learning Can Empower Children and Transform Schools.”

That finding was echoed by Pamela Orme, Anchorage School District social studies curriculum coordinator.

Orme said the SEL aspect of the standards became evident as they “began to unpack standards we found a clear correlation between Common Core and social, emotional learning.”

The CASEL report adds that some states like Illinois and Kansas are also implementing social emotional standards on their own, a practice it found is supported by a majority of teachers it surveyed.

The report also called it “critical” to develop social and emotional assessment tools so teachers can “measure students’ social and emotional competence.”

The Orwellian lengths the government is willing to go to to measure those results is made clear in the U.S. Department of Education Technology’s February 2013 draft report, “Promoting Grit, Tenacity and Perseverance: Critical Factors for Success in the 21st Century.”

Dubbed “affective computing” the report explores the “growing movement” within schools about how traits like dispositions, social skills, attitudes and “interpersonal resources” can be measured in students.

It also indicates a move toward changing student behaviors to promote what government declares are keys to success beyond “cognitive.”

The report also states assessments “can serve a wide range of purposes well beyond accountability” to include research and “diagnostic indicators for vulnerable students.”

It lauds the use of “affective computing” to measure social-emotional competencies, such as a student’s level of grit, tenacity and perseverance.

Included are photos of equipment that measures student responses: a facial expression camera, wrist wires, pressure mouse and posture analysis seat.

The report states the equipment has been used in studies of “data mining techniques.”

It states the sensors provide “constant, parallel streams of data” that when used with data mining techniques and self-reporting allows measurement and examination of feelings that include frustration, motivation, confidence, boredom and fatigue.

The report notes, “While this type of tool may not be necessary in a small class of students, it could be useful for examining emotional responses in informal learning environments for large groups, like museums.”

It also indicates collecting such data would help “individualize” learning, the latest trend in education.

To achieve individualized learning, many districts are providing computerized devices to students.

The devices not only provide a new way to access content, they are another way schools can track student activities, raising concerns of some parents and privacy advocates.

At least one school district has spied on students using school-issued laptops as revealed in a 2010 class action lawsuit against the Lower Merion School District in Philadelphia, Pa.

There, remote webcam spying was revealed after district officials attempted to punish then 15-year-old Blake Robbins for behavior in his bedroom.

The district admitted it gave students laptops they could use at home that included webcams that could be activated remotely by district personnel to spy on students.

Through the suit, it was revealed that two high schools in the district had secretly snapped 66,000 images.

Another student filed a separate lawsuit against the district after he discovered his school-issued laptop had been used to capture over 1,000 photos and screenshots without his knowledge.

These days, many districts have graduated to more portable products, like iPads, to give students.

A concerned father in Farmington, Minn., said the iPad initiative has resulted in district officials frequently examining the equipment that many also use at home.

He said middle school announcements regularly include a list of students who are ordered to the office so district personnel can inspect their iPad.

Since the iPad includes GPS tracking device capabilities, the parent, who asked to remain anonymous, cited concerns about the extent of data tracking the schools could access.

“Is there a tracking chip in there so that you could theoretically follow the student wherever he goes?” The parent asked. “How much information is the school district collecting through the iPad?”

There are few limits on how geolocation data collected in electronic devices can be used by educators.

Whatever information is on the iPad is completely accessible to school administrators, whether or not the device is owned by the district, according to Mo Canady, executive director of the National Association of School Resource Officers.

Canady said in most cases, school administrators have a lesser standard to meet than police when it comes to searching students and their belongings.

He added that school administrators have even more latitude when it involves a school-owned device.

“Law enforcement are bound by the Fourth Amendment (prohibiting unreasonable search and seizures),” Canady said. “School administration is not, so it makes a lot of difference.”

He said the same type of information school administrators can access if they have “reasonable suspicion” would require an officer to first obtain a search warrant before accessing the content.

Districts across the country that have allowed student iPad use also have polices that govern their use, and all reviewed for this article state they can be “seized and inspected” by the district at any time without warning.

The level of information about children districts are able to access, collect and distribute concerns Effrem, who said it is not their role as educators.

“I do not believe that parents are sending their kids to school to have psychological teaching, manipulation, monitoring, testing and data collection performed on their children,” she said. “That is not the role of the school.”

DESPITE all the evidence linked above, one still has to wonder: what’s their end goal? Well, if one accepts the premise that bringing down “Amerika” is key to their revolutionary plans, then what better way to do so than to capture generations of American children?

There is none.