Obama Ransomed (Anti-American) Bergdahl For Taliban But THREATENED Foley & Sotloff Families:DON’T Pay Ransom! What’s His End Game? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

PHOTO: After speaking with President Barack Obama by phone on Aug. 20, 2014, John and Diane Foley talk to reporters outside their home in Rochester, N.H.

SOME of this investigative journalist’s contacts, one independent of another, have suggested: yes, it may be time to pen a book (a compendium of sorts) on some of the findings within this site, particularly in relation to Obama Inc. and the geo-political chess games played under their reign for the benefit (F/B/O) of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Interesting proposition. Perhaps.

ASSUREDLY, a book-worthy rendition of all the anti-American actions by Barack HUSSEIN Obama would require a sequel, to adequately do justice to his crimes against the American people. The west. Oh my…in between this and that…where will the time come from…

THOUGH under consideration, there are certain moments whereby even those generally willing to give the benefit of the doubt (not exactly hard-nosed types) can no longer deny the undeniable: the man-child leading the free world is operating from a “head-space” which is foreign to most rational folks, unless one is Islamist-bent or a leftist collaborator.

WHICH leads us to a brief “comparative study” between the following two ransoms:

THE first involved the outrageous (and illegal) ransom paid in exchange for anti-American Bergdahl. 

MOST significantly, guess where some of the “traded” Taliban leaders are now? If you answered ISIS/ISIL, well, you would be right!! Treason: Three of the Five Enemy Combatants Obama Swapped are Now Islamic State (ISIS) Leaders!

Not only did Obama release the Islamic State (ISIS) leadership in return for a deserter who had joined the jihad, but he helped create the Islamic State by withdrawing precipitously from Iraq. Then he gave the “moderates” in Syria weapons, but they weren’t moderates and turned over their weapons to the Islamic State, or in some cases the Islamic State captured them. So the Islamic State has won some of its victories with help from American weaponry.

Obama provided the Islamic State with leadership and weaponry and the enemedia cleans up after him, like the man with the shovel following the circus elephant.

“THREE OF FIVE DETAINEES SWAPPED ARE NOW ISIS LEADERS,” Political Ears, September 15, 2014 (thanks to Christian)

exchange

Mind you, an investigative journalist was murdered to ensure its cover up! Consequentially, setting free Taliban killers was gonna happen, whatever it took. It was a high priority for Barack HUSSEIN Obama! 

There’s more. Do readers recall this “mysterious” death? 

MYSTERY GROWS: JOURNALIST DIED PREPPING OBAMA EXPOSÉ !

Major probe tied to agent suspected of sanitizing president’s passport records…

WHO can keep up….

REGARDLESS, as promised, an absolute tie-in existed between the Traitor-in-Chief’s release of top Taliban terrorists (held by U.S. forces) and the “sanitizing” of an anti-American soldier, Bowie Bergdahl. This traitorous road backtracks to the assassination of Hastings.

CONCOMITANTLY, Hastings was working on providing tangible linkage behind the terror trade. Admittedly, VERY dangerous terrain.

Tie-In One:

ON a very basic level, the Islamist-in-Chief collaborated with the Taliban to release stone cold TOP terror leaders. There is no doubt about this aspect, as reported at this site.

Tie-In-Two:

OMINOUSLY, CIA’s John Brennan, himself a Muslim convert, would never allow Hastings to continue his investigation. He reached a critical juncture in his findings, whereby Brennan’s murderous role – as contract killer – would become clear to all, once reported. This was a “bridge too far”, the “fourth estate” be damned. Demonstrably, he was chosen as CIA head for a multiplicity of reasons. Put on your thinking caps…

BEFORE you read any further, click on the following video. Resonant.

VIDEO – http://www.westernjournalism.com/traitor-bowe-bergdahl-linked-michael-hastings-murder/2/

SO when the aggrieved parents of two Americans held captive by ISIS/ISIL barbarians demanded a (possible) monetary exchange, well, the POTUS’s goons threatened: “no can do”!

Earlier this year, the Obama administration released five Taliban commanders to Qatar in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl, an alleged deserter who may have collaborated with the Taliban and who also could have the blood of American soldiers on his hands. While the same was obviously not done for beheaded journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, the Obama administration took it a step further according to the families of both men.

Bergdahl with Taliban commander Badruddin Haqqani

As Shoebat.com reported via the Daily Beast, CIA Director John Brennan had allegedly been pushing hard for the release of those five Taliban commanders since at least 2011.

A major issue here is one of consistency. Another major issue is the degree to which the Bergdahl family is connected to Islam. Shoebat.com reported on Bergdahl’s father extensively. While both Foley and Sotloff appeared to be sympathetic to the Syrian rebels and in the case of Sotloff, to the Muslim Brotherhood in some ways, there are strong indications that the Bergdahls were more than just sympathetic to Islam.

On one hand, we have the release of five high level Taliban commanders to a nation state that already openly supports terrorism (Qatar) in exchange for one soldier who may have defected to the enemy. On the other hand, the same administration who made that deal forbade the families of two captive journalists to privately raise ransom money to have those journalists released.

Here is Michael Foley, the brother of James, telling Megyn Kelly of Fox News how his family was treated by the administration. Note that Kelly expresses her understanding of a U.S. policy not to pay ransom to terrorists but is clearly taken aback that it would prohibit private funds from being raised to do so:

James Foley’s mother expressed similar sentiment in a separate interview.

The parents of Sotloff are saying the same thing:

The parents of murdered journalist Steven Sotloff were told by a White House counterterrorism official at a meeting last May that they could face criminal prosecution if they paid ransom to try to free their son, a spokesman for the family told Yahoo News Friday night.

“The family felt completely and utterly helpless when they heard this,” said Barak Barfi, a friend of Sotloff who is serving as a spokesman for his family. “The Sotloffs felt there was nothing they could do to get Steve out.”

The journalist’s father, Art, was “shaking” after the meeting with the official, who works for the National Security Council, Barfi said. The families of three other hostages being held by the militant group Islamic State were also at the White House meeting, sources told Yahoo News.

In a show of blatant hypocrisy, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the following in response to questions about the claims made by both families:

“We have found that terrorist organizations use hostage taking and ransoms as a critical source of financing for their organizations and that paying ransoms only puts other Americans in a position where they’re at even greater risk.”

Were not those five Taliban commanders ransom for Bergdahl?

NEVER mind the fact that the White House BROKE the law in the rush to pay human (jihadi) and monetary ransom for Bergdahl!

NOW that we understand how much coinage the Islamist-in-Chief willingly paid for the release of TOP TALIBAN jihadis (this was the goal, and Bergdahl’s “exchange” was handily available), in a swap for an anti-American soldier, one can extrapolate that the converse is also true.

IN other words, the fact that the release of two American journalists didn’t involve a quid pro quo for jihadis, but a straight monetary exchange, was to no benefit for Barack HUSSEIN Obama. This is not to say that ISIS/ISIL barbarians would have kept their word, nor that paying ransom to jihadis is EVER prudent, but that’s NOT the core issue.

THE crux for the American people (and the free world) is this: why the disparity, whereby Obama Inc. had no compunction against releasing Islamic terrorists, knowing they will go straight back to jihad, yet was against a monetary exchange (surely LESS dangerous than setting loose TOP Taliban) and even threatened the families willing to raise the money themselves? Is there something unclear about whose side Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) is on? If so, go back to sleep and don’t even bother reading any further.

BESIDES, another mitigating factor is the counter intuitive behavior of the Commander-in-Chief of the free world, irrespective of party affiliation, when he jaunted off to play golf after such a horrific atrocity against an American citizen. Who behaves this way, if not operating from a jihadi worldview? Who indeed.

The rising clamor over the beheading of two Americans, and rapidly sinking polls, forced President Obama to reassure the nation last week he had a plan to deal with the Islamic State. He did some of what he had to do, but only some, and so most military analysts believe the expanded airstrikes will not be a sufficient match for the size and weaponry of the terrorist army.

They miss the point. The disjointed speech wasn’t really about terrorism and launching a new war. It was about saving Obama’s presidency.

He is sinking fast and could soon pass the point of no return. In fact, it may already be too late to save the SS Obama.

The whole second term has been a string of disasters, with the toxic brew of his ObamaCare lies, middling economic growth and violent global breakdown casting doubt on the president’s stewardship. Six years into his tenure, nothing is going as promised.

Earlier on, he could have trotted out his teleprompters and turned public opinion his way, or at least stopped the damage. But the magic of his rhetoric is long gone, and not just because the public has tuned him out.

They’ve tuned him out because they’ve made up their minds about him. They no longer trust him and don’t think he’s a good leader.

Most ominously, they feel less safe now than they did when he took office. Americans know the war on terror isn’t over, no matter what their president claims.

Those findings turned up in a tsunami of recent polls that amount to a public vote of no confidence. They shook up the White House so much that the plan to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants was put on hold to try to protect Democratic candidates from voter wrath in November.

IT was a much needed eye-opener, the “aha” moment, aka the “eureka effect”, which has woken up many otherwise sleepy heads, finally, coming to the realization: despite everything else, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is both mentally unbalanced and also a stone cold supporter of Islamic terrorists!

NOW, it matters not a whit that his handlers prepped him to deal with necessary damage control. The fact of the matter is that it took American heads to (literally) fly off their shoulders for the majority public to recognize: the ship of state is being led by a malignant POTUS, one whose dangerous agenda still has 2 years to play out!

HOWEVER, though belatedly, “many be” shivering timbers…  

UPDATE: The Assassination Of Michael Hastings & Its Nexus To Obama’s Bonafides/Passport: The Fingerprints of CIA Chief John Brennan…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This site evinces ZERO tolerance for any substance abuse, be it alcohol or drugs. Dedicated readers herein – family, friends and colleagues know this to be the case – certainly realize this is not an overstatement. Admittedly, this address may appear, at times, rigid in its (core) views, but so be it. No apologies on this end. Unnecessary. Yet, why is this even being mentioned with the world on fire, and with this blogger’s immediate neighborhood in the cross hairs too? Really now, why should anyone give a damn about the above? 

Well, in as much as Syria/Iran is a trigger-shot away from exploding the entire Mid East (possibly beyond…and this is despite the Pyromaniac-in-Chief’s waffling/posturing); and those who are DIRECTLY involved in leading the (heretofore) free world are nothing less than an Islamist-in-Chief, in lock-step with his CIA counterpart, John Brennan (a Muslim convert); connecting as many dots as possible is one’s patriotic duty, at least if one wants to be taken seriously as a geo-political blogger/investigative journalist.

Back to the substance abuse. There have been assertions that Hastings had a trace amount of drugs in his system, when his car exploded into a fireball, thus, as a result, ‘investigation closed’. NOT so fast. Reportedly, he used to abuse drugs, about 14 years prior to his death and was indulging once again, approximately a month before he died. And, dear readers, this is hardly the ‘smoking gun’, being that the medical examiner said that the drugs found in his system were negligible and didn’t impair his driving! So, let us take said (mitigating) factor off the table and explore forward. It’s an obligation to find out the truth, wherever it lands. 

Moreover, this blog would be the FIRST to recognize that substance abuse may have been a key contributing factor to his death. However, rational/truthful folks know that one size doesn’t fit all, and it has been medically determined that the drugs in his system was not a factor. Not only that, but the cumulative evidence is more than compelling: Michael Hastings death was a targeted hit.

Back to Barack HUSSEIN Obama…and his rattling skeletons – and the way in which his (Islamist) CIA Director ties into them. Folks, this is where the action, the core of the investigation, is at. Key to unraveling Hastings gory death is their intermingling, not only relative to his assasination, but also to the wild fires in the Mid East. Nevertheless, let’s stick to one fireball at a time.

Talk about creepy skeletons… but their main heavy duty and criminal intersection came in the run up to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s quest for the White House, back in 2008. How many recall the ‘mysterious’ rifling of passport(s) by employees at the State Department, one of whom later turned up dead? Yet, how many also knew that he was a contract worker for Stanley Inc, a computer-related firm specializing in passports ! and headed up by Brennan? Quite a coincidence. Now, if one wants a juicy piece of leverage/blackmail to hold onto, and at the same time work as a ‘sanitizer’, the possibilities are endless – spook-like. You think? If not, you just got to place yourself into the mindset of high level criminal ‘strategists’, and so much falls in line. Think of a highly complicated jigsaw puzzle. Go out of the (mental) box.

With the above background neatly aligned – links and all – let’s now head onto the assassination of Hastings for some truth telling and then cogitate over the following:

MYSTERY GROWS: JOURNALIST DIED PREPPING OBAMA EXPOSÉ – embedded video

Major probe tied to agent suspected of sanitizing president’s passport records

Aug. 30, 2013

 JEROME R. CORSI About

  •  hastings-crash

NEW YORK – Before his death in a fiery car crash, Michael Hastings was preparing to publish a major investigative piece tied to the undercover agent who is suspected of sanitizing President Obama’s passport records prior to the 2008 presidential election.

The mystery has only deepened since the Los Angeles Coroner’s Office ruled that drugs in his system at the time of the June 18 crash, including amphetamines and marijuana, likely did not contribute to the crash.

Hastings, 33 years old at the time of his death, wrote for Gentleman’s Quarterly, Rolling Stone and Buzzfeed, reporting on national security issues.

His June 2010 article in Rolling Stone featuring remarks highly critical of the Obama administration made by Gen. Stanley McChrystal — then the commander of allied forces in Afghanistan — led to President Obama relieving McChrystal of command.

Reported drug use

The autopsy two months after Hastings’ death found small amounts of amphetamine in his blood, suggesting he may have taken methamphetamine several hours before his death. Traces of marijuana also suggested Hastings had smoked the drug hours before he had taken the methamphetamine.

Hastings died when his Mercedes, traveling at a high rate of speed, crossed into the median on a deserted Highland Avenue at 4:20 a.m. and struck a tree. The automobile burst into flames, charring Hastings’ body so badly that it took several days to make a positive identification.

Los Angeles newspapers have suggested Hastings had become obsessed with Edward Snowden’s revelations about the National Security Agency’s massive domestic surveillance capabilities and with disclosures the Department of Justice had obtained of the phone records of Associated Press reporters.

His fiancée, Jordanna Thigpen, told the LA Weekly that just before his death, Hastings’ behavior had become erratic because of his increasing concerned that helicopters commonly seen in the Hollywood Hills were spying on him and that his Mercedes had been tampered with.

“He was scared, and he wanted to leave town,” Thigpen told the newspaper.

She recalled that the night before his death, Hastings asked Thigpen if he could borrow her Volvo because he was afraid to drive his own car.

Fox News reported family members told investigators that Hastings, who supposedly had been “sober” for 14 years, had begun using drugs the month before his death. The drugs included the hallucinogenic DMT, although it was not detected in a blood report conducted after the crash.

Fox News further reported a family member told investigators Hastings was seen passed out at home about three hours before the crash and that he had been smoking marijuana the night of the crash.

Investigators told Fox News that Hastings was found after the crash with a medicinal marijuana identity card in his wallet and that he apparently was using the drug to ease post-traumatic stress disorder experienced after his assignments in Afghanistan and Iraq.

A security video that captured Hastings’ car crash showed a flash of light before the car hit the tree, raising suspicions Hastings’ death may have been caused by an explosion.

San Diego 6 News has reported that a witness in a nearby business is claiming the explosion occurred before Hastings’ car hit the tree. An explosion before impact, which would slow down the vehicle, would explain the minimal damage observed on the palm tree. Other physical evidence at the crash site also is not consistent with a high-speed, out-of-control impact.

See the security video:

 Brennan and the CIA

On Aug. 12, Kimberly Dvorak reported for San Diego 6 News that Hastings at the time of his death was working on an exposé on CIA director John Brennan.

In July, a source provided the station with an email hacked from “super secret CIA contractor” Stratfor’s President Fred Burton and subsequently posted on WikiLeaks that suggested Brennan was in charge of the Obama administration’s surveillance of investigative journalists.

Michael Hastings and Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett at President Obama’s election-night victory party in 2012 (Photo: John V. Santore)

Though rumors persist that Hastings was near completion of a new exposè on Brennan to be published shortly in Rolling Stone, the magazine so far has not published any such piece.

Obama’s passport records sanitized

WND has previously reported that Brennan played a controversial role in what many suspect was an effort to sanitize Obama’s passport records prior to the 2008 presidential election.

On March 21, 2008, during the 2008 presidential campaign, two unnamed contract employees for the State Department were fired and a third unnamed State Department contract employee was disciplined for breaching the passport file of Democratic presidential candidate and then-senator Barack Obama.

The Washington Times on March 20, 2008, noted that all three had used their authorized computer network access to look up and read Obama’s records within the State Department’s consular affairs section that “possesses and stores passport information.”

Contacted by the newspaper, State Department spokesman Sean McCormick attributed the violations to non-political motivations, stressing that the three individuals involved “did not appear to be seeking information on behalf of any political candidate or party.”

“As far as we can tell, in each of the three cases, it was imprudent curiosity,” McCormick told the Washington Times.

Exactly how the State Department came to that conclusion, McCormick did not disclose.

By the next day, the story had changed.

The New York Times reported March 21, 2008, that the security breach had involved unauthorized searches of the passport records not just of Obama, but also of then-presidential contenders Sens. John McCain and Hillary Clinton.

Again, the New York Times attributed the breaches to “garden-variety snooping by idle employees” that was “not politically motivated.”

Like the Washington Times, the New York Times gave no explanation to back up its assertion that the breaches were attributable to non-political malfeasance.

Still, the New York Times report said then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had spent Friday morning calling all three presidential candidates. Rice had told Obama that she was sorry for the violation. She said she “told him that I myself would be very disturbed if I learned that somebody had looked into my passport file.”

The newspaper quoted Obama saying he appreciated the apology but that he expected the passport situation “to be investigated diligently and openly.”

According to the New York Times report, Obama’s tone of concern was obvious.

“One of the things that the American people count on in their interactions with any level of government is that if they have to disclose personal information, that is going to stay personal and stay private,” Obama told reporters. “And when you have not just one, but a series of attempts to tap into people’s personal records, that’s a problem, not just for me, but for how our government is functioning.”

The New York Times noted that the files examined were likely to contain sensitive personal information, including Social Security numbers, addresses and dates of birth as well as passport applications and other biographical information that would pertain to U.S. citizenship. Only at the end of the article did the paper note that State Department spokesman McCormick had emphasized the most egregious violation appeared to have been made against Obama.

Obama was the only one of the three presidential candidates involved who had his passport file breached on three separate occasions. The first occurred Jan. 9, 2008, followed by separate violations Feb. 21 and March 14. Moreover, all three of the offending employees had breached Obama’s files, while the passport files of McCain and Clinton had been breached each only once.

The Brennan connection

The New York Times noted the two offending State Department contract employees who were fired had worked for Stanley Inc., a company based in Arlington, Va., while the reprimanded worker continued to be employed by the Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va.

The newspaper gave no background on either corporation other than to note that Stanley Inc. did “computer work for the government.”

John Brennan was sworn in as CIA director in March

At that time, Stanley Inc. was a 3,500-person technology firm that had just won a $570 million contract to provide computer-related passport services to the State Department, headed by Brennan, who then serving as an adviser on intelligence and foreign policy to Obama’s presidential campaign.

By Saturday, March 22, 2008, the Washington Times reported that the State Department investigation had focused on the contract worker for the Analysis Corporation, because he was the only one of the three involved in breaching the passport records of both Sens. Obama and McCain, the two presidential candidates whose eligibility as “natural born” citizens under Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution were in question.

Consistent with the claim that the motive for the passport breach merely was mischief, the three State Department contract employees received relatively light penalties. Two were fired and one was reprimanded.

Although at the time the State Department promised a full-scale investigation, the public was kept in the dark.

In July 2008, the State Department’s Office of Inspector General issued a 104-page investigative report on the passport breach incidents, stamped “Sensitive But Unclassified.” The document was so heavily redacted, it was nearly worthless to the public. Scores of passages were blacked out entirely, including one sequence of 29 consecutive pages that were each obliterated by a solid black box that made impossible the determination even of paragraph structures.

One investigative reporter, Kenneth Timmerman, said a well-placed but unnamed source told him that the real point of the passport breaches was to cauterize the Obama file, removing from it any information that could prove damaging to his presidential eligibility.

According to this theory, the breaches of McCain’s and Clinton’s files were done for misdirection purposes, to create confusion and to suggest the motives of the perpetrators were attributable entirely to innocent curiosity.

Brennan tilts toward Islam

WND has reported that in a speech delivered Aug. 9, 2009, to the Center for Strategic and International Studies that is archived on the White House website, Brennan commented that using “a legitimate term, ‘jihad,’ meaning to purify oneself or to wage a holy struggle for a moral goal” to describe terrorists “risks reinforcing the idea that the United States is somehow at war with Islam itself.”

Brennan advised that U.S. foreign policy should encourage greater assimilation of the Hezbollah terrorist organization into the Lebanese government.

WND further reported that in a July 2008 article in The Annals, a publication of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, Brennan argued it “would not be foolhardy, however, for the United States to tolerate, and even to encourage, greater assimilation of Hezbollah into Lebanon’s political system, a process that is subject to Iranian influence.”

Continued Brennan: “Hezbollah is already represented in the Lebanese parliament and its members have previously served in the Lebanese cabinet, reflections of Hezbollah’s interest in shaping Lebanon’s political future from within government institutions. This involvement is a far cry from Hezbollah’s genesis as solely a terrorist organization dedicated to murder, kidnapping and violence.”

At the August 2009 press conference for the CSIS, Brennan declared: “Hezbollah started out as purely a terrorist organization back in the early ‘80s and has evolved significantly over time. And now it has members of parliament, in the cabinet; there are lawyers, doctors, others who are part of the Hezbollah organization.”

Middle Eastern terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah frequently maintain civilian units of doctors and lawyers to emphasize their outreach with local politicians and to increase their political acceptance in the international arena.

Conceivably, the Istanbul-based Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief, better known by the Turkish acronym IHH, would fit into Brennan’s definition of the charitable side of organizations such as Hezbollah, despite IHH’s ties to al-Qaida. The links to the terror organization have been amply documented by experts such as former investigating judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, who led the French judiciary’s counter-terrorism unit for nearly two decades before retiring in 1977.

Despite this history, IHH is not included on the State Department’s current list of 45 groups designated as foreign terrorist organizations, which names both Hezbollah and Hamas.

In his speech to the New York University law school students posted on YouTube by the White House, Brennan included a lengthy statement in Arabic that he did not translate for his English-speaking audience.

Noting that he was as an undergraduate with the American University in Cairo in the 1970s, Brennan proceeded to use only the Arabic name, “Al Quds,” when referring to Jerusalem. He said that during his 25 years in government, he spent considerable time in the Middle East, as a political officer with the State Department and as a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia.

“In Saudi Arabia, I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodians of the two holy mosques in Mecca and Medina,” he said. “I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Muslims of making that pilgrimage.”

WND previously reported Brennan participated in a meeting with Muslim law students facilitated by the Islamic Society of North America, a group that was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the prosecution of the founders of the Holy Land Foundation of Texas. The founders were given life sentences “for funneling $12 million” to Hamas, the group currently in political control of the Gaza.

WND further reported that at the meeting with Muslim law students, Brennan declared himself a “citizen of the world” who believed the U.S. government should never engage in “profiling” in pursuit of national security.

FORENSICS – in all its permutations – is a powerful tool, especially when conducted alongside an unbiased accident scene reconstruction. Most importantly, the ‘Laws of Physics/Newton’s Laws’ can’t be trifled with, even if one is ‘The One’. And, being that what this blogger knows about high level physics can fill a thimble, a well respected contact – in a branch of physics – does hold a doctorate in Classical Mechanics at one of the Ivies. Bless his patient heart. Most intrinsically, he is more than capable of filling in all the gaps, whenever needing a scientific assist. Also, when not wanting to involve certain nearest and dearest – who are amply scientifically endowed – this blogger has a roster of experts to call upon, regardless of the field in question. Therefore, the following info was placed before said gentleman, and he is a gentle man:

According to the official story, Hastings was traveling at 100 miles per hour when he hit a tree, causing his 2013 Mercedes Benz C250 to explode and burst into flames. San Diego Channel 6’s Kimberly Dvorak contacted a San Diego State University professor of Mechanics to analyze newly unearthed video of Hastings’ vehicle seconds before the so-called crash. The professor stated that Hastings was only traveling 35 miles per hour, not 100 miles per hour as investigators claim. Further, according to Dvorak, a witness states that the vehicle blew up before it hit the tree. The unearthed video seems to corroborate this, as multiple explosions occur prior to the vehicle coming to rest at the base of the tree, not to mention the fact that there was minimal damage to the tree. Further, the engine and drivetrain were ejected several hundred feet from the vehicle at a ninety degree angle to the direction of travel. According to the laws of physics, this is impossible. This proves the vehicle exploded before hitting the tree.” 

Still, why is this relevant? Because unbiased physics profs – upon review of major evidence – concluded: It would have been impossible for the crash to have occurred, as peddled by the powers that be. Now, who has more incentive to butcher the evidence? You decide.

Beyond significant is the absolute fact that too many people who investigate, and consequently find the goods on the POTUS (again, why are all his records hidden?) end up meeting ‘unfortunate/untimely’ deaths. Then shoot on over to ‘dropping like flies’ and the hovering ‘remains’, as it illustrates the nightmarish truth of what is taking place under Obama Inc. Indeed, Putin doesn’t have a leg up on the current administration. Oh no. But to the Russian strong man’s credit, he makes no bones about what happens to those who thwart his rule. Not so with Obama’s goons, as they preen and pose as ‘democratic’ leaders.
Retch.
In this regard, all of the above is not so much a mystery but a criminal conspiracy and worthy of serious jail time – for starters!