IN an ever increasing Orwellian sphere akin to Alice-in-Wonderland’s magical universe, leftists hurl bugaboos towards conservatives as if they were “truths” derived from Mount Sinai. Whom do they think they are fooling?
BUT in the real world the facts are quite the opposite, therefore, they should shut their traps and reconsider the garbage they continuously spew in said direction. In reality, as they accuse conservatives of everything under the sun, racism (as if Islam is even a race!) is atop their laundry list of inflammatory rhetoric. Not only that, the real culprits, those who are up to their eyeballs and necks with slavery AND rape – from time immemorial and with no end in sight – are their Islamic pets who have yet to give up both predilections! Imagine that.
NOW, some may believe that this site is obsessed with the sexual relationship between Islam and jihad, but that too would be a monstrous lie. More specifically, it is Islam’s barbarians who are deeply embedded with sex and slave jihad due to its “koshering” by fatwas and the like! Ain’t that the damnable truth. It is what it is, despite the left’s refusal to recognize with whom they are “in bed.”
DO readers recall a recent truth-telling fest, one whose (icky and depraved) basis revolved around leftist/socialist imbued German “welcome wagons” given to the so-called “refugees”, despite their rampant raping of non-Muslim women and children, female and male alike? If not, time to catch up to speed.
AS is said,”boys will be boys” takes on the most ominous tone imaginable, at least when exposing Germany’s official “welcome wagons.” How so? Their Orwellian reactions to rape-jihad, which happened to occur right under their noses, is a prudent place to start! And if readers are still capable of being shocked, due to all the madness displayed by western leaders, suffice to state the following is prime evidence of said moral and national breakdown.
Oh, the irony. An association called “Refugees Welcome Bonn e.V.” organized a refugee welcome party. But then these do-gooders met the Islamic culture: the Muslim migrants sexually molested the women at the party.
And still the running dogs for Islam on the left continue to lay down for them (literally). You can’t make this stuff up.
Here is what “Welcome Refugee” org posted on their site after the party (thanks to Mark):
Refugees Welcome Bonn e.V. wants to comment on the incidents that happened on party on the Township on Nov. 7th and was co-organized by our group. At the party we observed that some men molested, touched and harassed women. As co-organizer we want to apologize. During the party we tried to identify the offenders and make the leave the venue; also we made announcements where we asked to stop this behavior immediately. However, these measures were not successful. We apologize for that! Those men cast a negative light on our organization as well as on all men and male refugees, who were at our party.
[…] instead of just adversely pointing fingers at those who misbehave, we believe it’s as important for everyone in our civil society to tackle these differences in the daily integration.
IF said proofs are not prima facie evidence of twin devils separated at birth – Islam’s monsters and their leftist/socialist collaborators – well, little else qualifies. But that doesn’t mean they have the right to drag the rest of us down to their filthy depths of what is considered “acceptable” within a civilized society. Not on this site’s watch.
EVEN so, hang onto your last meal….
Saleh says, ‘Those whom you own’ (slaves) existed before Islam. It existed among all nations and countries, not just among pre-Islam Arabs. Anyone could trade in freeborn men and women. This is called the selling of freeborn people. It’s like the selling of human organs and trafficking in freeborn humans today. But when Islam emerged, it put slavery into order, by limiting it to legitimate wars between Muslims and their enemies. If we fought Israel, which is plundering land, and is an aggressor against people and their faith…”
She continued, “Obviously, it is impossible that we will fight Israel, even though Surat Al-Isra in the Quran foretells this, and nothing is beyond the power of Allah… The female prisoners of wars are ‘those whom you own.’ In order to humiliate them, they become the property of the army commander, or of a Muslim, and he can have sex with them just like he has sex with his wives…”
Now, keep in mind this is coming from a “moderate” Muslim, so this is not an extreme view…
STILL yet, if more proof of the same is required, so be it.
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. These Muslims in Cologne no doubt don’t think they have done anything wrong — these women, after all, are just Infidels.
ALAS, when even supposed “moderate” (female, no less) clerics from Al-Azhar – Sunni Islam’s most revered university – expound upon the Islamic legality of rape and slavery, isn’t it time to admit that Islam has NO place within the borders of ANY civilized western country, regardless of its “religious” veneer??
MOST significantly, if Islam was an atheistic and geographically-defined regime like Nazi Germany or Communist Russia, many more westerners would be able to grasp its evil intent by now. But our enemy poses as a worldwide monotheistic religion, and here is where Islam departs from other cultures that exalt war. Islam, is a religion whose prophet forms an integral part of the faith. It is not sufficient to believe in the Scriptures of such prophets or messengers but in the messengers themselves. This is another reason why Muslims have wielded the sword to spread the faith and to send “infidels” to eternal rest.
AND even though many of us are not religious, we tend to believe that, withstanding the wars in which Christian monotheists engaged in the past, the participants in these wars were actually violating their sacred creeds or scriptures. In other words, we want to believe that religion—at least monotheism—is basically benevolent and peace loving; and that even though history manifests bloody examples to the contrary, we incline to the idea that these wars may be attributed—stated simply—to either (1) intellectual causes, (2) moral causes, or (3) systemic causes, meaning, the international system of sovereign states. The first may involve the miscalculations of statesmen regarding the interests of their respective countries. The second may involve the lust for power and dominion. The third may involve, as indicated, the nation-state system itself, which tends to intensify and magnify international conflict.
ABOVE all else, that which clarifies the intractable nature of Islam and why this enemy constitutes a mortal threat to Western civilization, hence, to the Judeo-Christian heritage, the heart of this civilization, is the most pressing task of our times.
EVERYTHING pales in comparison.