IT is always gratifying to find out that straight shooting and high level security professionals have arrived at the same general conclusions as this Muslim Brotherhood expert and investigative journalist.

INTRINSICALLY, the aforementioned is in reference to the part played by Obama Inc. in “setting the stage” for the rise of ISIS, and its eventual declaration as the Islamic Caliphate. Well, said assessment may have appeared a tad “conspiratorial” in certain quarters, when first expounded at this site. No matter. No longer.

EFFECTIVELY, let’s hark back to particular dots which were previously connected, going as far back as 2013.

LET’S be clear: HUSSEIN Obama’s State Department, in tandem with the CIA, created ISIS. For the stated record, soon after Benghazigate blew up, this investigative journalist analyzed the following knock-on effects throughout several commentaries but summed up its basis in a recent report:

AS the world stares transfixed by the speed in which ISIS captured Ramadi and Palmyra, it must be internalized where the hydra-like monsters spawned from. This knowledge base will explain how they catapulted into top-tier status. Forthwith, let’s begin connecting the dots. It is only by taking the time to do so that we can properly extrapolate what HUSSEIN Obama’s game plan really is.

DOT ONE:

ALAS, it was previously asserted (Oct. 2013), while assessing the illegal war into Libya – with Benghazigate as its outgrowth – that the main objective was a weapons-running operation F/B/O Syrian Sunni jihadists and the empowerment of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Caliphate-driven. Concomitantly, the Brotherhood is the parent of al-Qaeda and ISIS is its offshoot.

DOT TWO:

MOREOVER, as the region started to melt down after Obama Inc’s. adventure into Libya, requisite players realized that Iraq’s forces were in no position to stand up to ISIS without multiplying its force power. Therefore, what else did they expect the knock-on effects of said quasi-intervention in Iraq would be, other than a complete mowing down by ISIS? Huh and duh…continue reading…

SO as repeatedly proven, ISIS is an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq, andal-Qaeda is a product of the Brotherhood Mafia. Simple as that….

RESULTANT, why wouldn’t the very same “benefactors” of ISIS (al-Qaeda/MB alike) train a so-called Islamist “police commander” – plus countless others – rather than deny them elite training on U.S. soil too? Rhetorical.

A fighter with the Islamic State group in a new online video was trained in counterterrorism tactics in the U.S., the State Department confirmed.…continue reading….

BUT even as hard as it is to conceive that a malignant POTUS would (and could) subvert the entire national apparatus and interest – and with an impotent and somewhat colluding Congress barely taking him on – the proofs are more than manifest. Indicting. Alas, former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – confirmed this site’s thesis, as gleaned from a RECENTLY (emphasis placed) leaked Defense Intelligence Agency document.  

An internal Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document produced recently shows that the U.S. knew that the actions of “the West, Gulf countries and Turkey” in Syria might create a terrorist group like ISIS and an Islamic caliphate.

While the powers-that-be have tried to downplay the significance of the document, the former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – just confirmed its importance.

By any measure, Flynn was a top-level American military commander. Flynn served as:

• The Director of the U.S. Intelligence Agency
• The Director of intelligence for Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), the main military agency responsible for targeting Al-Qaeda and other Islamic terrorists
• The Commander of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
• The Chair of the Military Intelligence Board
• Assistant director of national intelligence

Flynn confirmed the authenticity of the document in a new interview, and said:

[Interviewer] So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis?

[Flynn] I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision.

[Interviewer] A willful decision to support an insurgency that had Salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

[Flynn] It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.

Hasan: In 2012 the U.S. was helping coordinate arms transfers to those same groups [Salafists, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda in Iraq], why did you not stop that if you’re worried about the rise of quote-unquote Islamic extremists?

Flynn: I hate to say it’s not my job…but that…my job was to…was to to ensure that the accuracy of our intelligence that was being presented was as good as it could be.

Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).

The  DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:

• Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
• The West identifies with the opposition
• The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
• The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
• “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war’; see 7.B.)
• Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
• A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)

MIND you, it is important to note that Turkey’s Erdogan, HUSSEIN Obama’s closest ally in the Mid East – highlighted within the DIA report – had been singled out as a Caliphate/Brotherhood/ISIS beneficiary at these pages as a key player, and more than once. At major interviews alike. Okay.

 

CONCLUSIVELY, it is not as if the U.S. is new to climbing into bed with Islamists. Not at all. In fact, through a grave geo-political miscalculation (let alone lack of understanding as to the ultimate goals of Islam’s warriors, as well as due to the prodding of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, an inveterate lover of   Arabs/Muslims and the go to guy during this period) the CIA funded and trained the mujahideen, aka Al Qaeda and the Taliban, to rout the Russians from Afghanistan.

ADDITIONALLY, Brzezinski is also an influential  foreign policy adviser to HUSSEIN Obama! The “plot” thickens.

 

 

STRATEGICALLY speaking, the strategy to counter the Russians by training Islamic barbarians was beyond miscalculated. No, this is not a 20/20 hindsight observation, but that which is borne from a deep knowledge base, relative to warriors inspired by the Koran! Not only that, preceding Islamic inspired terror attacks – from the earliest part of the 20th century – displayed what Allah’s soldiers understood as their duty to protect the ummah, regardless of all else. 

HOWEVER, in the main, most – though not all – of America’s top tier were looking out for U.S. interests during the proxy war with Russia. Its blow back hardly requires edification.

NEVERTHELESS, instead of internalizing the lessons learned – as byproducts of aligning, by proxy or otherwise, with Islamic jihadists –HUSSEIN Obama and surrogates aim for an anti-American outcome. Incontrovertibly. 

AS is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. Inherently, the above (plus enumerable proofs scattered throughout this site and elsewhere) demonstrates how ISIS became the mega force it quickly morphed into, thereby, possessing the ability to declare a Caliphate in such short order.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, how much should be accrued to happenstance, bad luck or the like, when a treasure trove of high grade U.S. military hardware was left behind for ISIS (and aligned groups) to inherit? 

Additional military prizes, courtesy of Obama, included numerous stacks of weapons crates that were full of the latest and greatest small arms and explosives that will undoubtedly be used against America and our allies in the future.

HMM…”spoils of war” is one way to look at it. More accurately, purposefully gifted booty!! 

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}