Team Trump’s (Islamic) Cognitive Dissonance:Iranian WND Architect Ensconced At State!What Happened To:”Worst Deal/Document Ever Negotiated”? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

FROM the get-go, let there be no doubt: this American-Israeli thanks G-d (as well as millions of patriots who voted for him….this ex-pat included) that President Trump was elected. So much so – even with the time difference between Israel and the U.S. – there was no shut-eye on this end until the election was called by FOX on Israel’s YES cable network. Beyond nerve-racking. Nail biting too. Not only that, several pre-election commentaries highlighted the urgency and importance of a Trump victory to the free world. No exaggeration.

STILL yet, personal preference/ideology aside, it doesn’t obviate the necessity to call him (and his team) to task in matters of grave import, despite the overall support. In fact, it is a (well-informed) patriotic obligation to do so! Yes, there is always room for criticism, even if one is “The Donald.” Besides, when it comes to Islamic jihad, the Middle East and its geo-political knock-on effects, let’s just say that this expert will go head-to-head against so-called “experts among experts”, even those attached to President Trump’s team! Now, if proof of said proficiency is required, the reader is referred to “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad”, specifically, pages 13-15, 18, and 32-55 – and that’s just for starters. 

Image result for pics of iran and nukes

NOW that that is settled, few can rationally argue that empowering Iran’s mad mullahs with WMD’s isn’t an existential threat to the free world, let alone America and Israel. To wit, it is imperative to shout from America’s (and Israel’s) rooftops re who’s who and what’s what within Washington’s corridors. Decision-makers.

BUT before this site lay’s out its overarching case, take note of the recently reported Islamic blindness found within Trump’s top picks: “Why Did ‘Mad Dog’ Mattis Nominate Anne Patterson, An MB Sympathizer? What About McMaster’s (NSC Adviser) Aversion To Islam + Terrorism? What’s Going On”?  You get the picture….

WHICH brings us back to more of the same, this time in relation to Iran, the world’s top sponsor of terror! Mind you, this designation does not expunge Saudi Arabia, as Sunni Islam’s mega jihadi (exporter) front. 

IN this regard, team Trump’s cognitive dissonance is revealed for all the world to see, and this is a result of an opening assertion: “this expert will go head-to-head against so-called “experts among experts”, even those attached to President Trump”! Hardly smack-talk. 

PRESENTING…..

House of Bribes: How the United States led the way to a Nuclear Iran

October 2015

House of Bribes: How the United States Led the Way to a Nuclear Iran is a product of the New Coalition of Concerned Citizens: Adina Kutnicki, Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Hannah Szenes, Right Side News, Marcus Kohan, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trevor Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, William Palumbo.
Contents Executive Summary Preface………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Background………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) lobbying arm for the Islamic Republic of Iran………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros………………………………………………
Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster  Complicity of the GOP …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..         Consequences/Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………..
Executive Summary
The Iranian nuclear deal is a full capitulation to Iran’s terrorist mastermind Mullahs, and the latest in a series of betrayals of the American people and allies by the Obama administration. At the highest level of the administration, Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor, the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, prioritized rapprochement with the terror state. Throughout the process and negotiations, she had the backing of billionaire investor (and Obama-backer) George Soros, and his multi-headed network of tax-exempt foundations. Their efforts were driven by deep-rooted anti-Semitism and personal greed. Meanwhile, since the mid-1990s, a small but very connected Iranian lobby (funded, in part, by George Soros) has been laying the groundwork for normalizing relations with Tehran. Operating through a variety of non-governmental organizations and political action committees, the lobby courted Democrat and Republican politicians. With the election of (Soros-backed) Obama in 2008, the Iranian lobby had very receptive ears in the White House. International business interests were courted and effectively bribed with access to Iranian markets, until finally the deal was realized, approved, and sealed by a vote of the United Nations Security Council.
Preface
Thus far, the reports and exposés issued by the New Coalition of Concerned Citizens* have focused on the threat posed by Islamists to American sovereignty. The Qatar Awareness Campaign brought to light extensive influence network of the State of Qatar and their ruling al-Thani family. The Betrayal Papers explained the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of the Obama administration’s agenda and policies, foreign and domestic.
This report will detail the sinister influence of the small, yet well-connected and very powerful, Iran lobby. Though the Iran lobby’s highest level contacts are prominent Democrats, their reach spans both major political parties. Like previous exposés, this investigation will mention familiar names, including George Soros, Valerie Jarrett, and the United Nations.
Iran is widely regarded by counterterrorism experts as the heart of Islamic radicalism, and the point of origin for terrorism with a specific geopolitical agenda (i.e., the creation of an Islamic Caliphate, much like the Islamic State, but dominated by Shiites, not Sunnis). With the eager embrace of a legacy-hungry Obama administration, the Iran lobby managed to achieve a deal which makes the United States the de facto most powerful backer of Islamic terrorism in the world.
How did this happen?……read the whole dastardly betrayal!! 

 

AND while the anti-American, anti-Israel, and anti-western betrayal lands smack-dab at the Betrayer-in-Chief’s door, know that President Trump will bear his own burden of shame, onus, that is, if he fails to remove Iran’s main puppeteer at State, Sahar Nowrouzzadeh

Sahar Nowrouzzadeh’s portfolio (Term of Employment – 7/2016 – present) includes Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Prior to joining the Policy Planning Staff, she served as a Director for Iran and Iran Nuclear Implementation on the National Security Council Staff from 2014-2016. Sahar also previously served as a Foreign Affairs Officer at the U.S. Department of State and a Team Chief and Senior Analyst at the Department of Defense. She received her Bachelor’s Degree from the George Washington University’s Elliott School of International Affairs, and completed her Master’s Degree in Persian Studies at the University of Maryland-College Park.

THUS, it is not as if this counter-jihad expert is the only one who took note, re Sahar Nowrouzzadeh’s entrenchment at the State Department, an agency awash with anti-American and anti-Israel bureaucrats. A monumental understatement!

ACCORDING to the estimable Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch:

The Iran deal essentially green-lights Iran’s nuclear program and led to Obama showering billions of dollars upon the Islamic Republic. Why is Sahar Nowrouzzadeh still in the State Department at all, much less being in charge of Iran policy planning? Trump ran for the presidency denouncing the Iran deal. The Trump administration is clearly in deep confusion.

Nowrouzzadeh is a former employee of the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC). NIAC (of which Leftist establishment media darling Reza Aslan and Leftist “academic” Juan Cole are Board members) has been established in court as a lobbying group for the Islamic Republic of Iran. Said Michael Rubin: “Jamal Abdi, NIAC’s policy director, now appears to push aside any pretense that NIAC is something other than Iran’s lobby. Speaking at the forthcoming ‘Expose AIPAC’ conference, Abdi is featured on the ‘Training: Constituent Lobbying for Iran’ panel. Oops.” Iranian freedom activist Hassan Daioleslam “documented over a two-year period that NIAC is a front group lobbying on behalf of the Iranian regime.” NIAC had to pay him nearly $200,000 in legal fees after they sued him for defamation over his accusation that they were a front group for the mullahs, and lost.

“Iran deal architect is now running Tehran policy at the State Department,” by Jordan Schachtel, Conservative Review, March 14, 2017:

A trusted Obama aide who once worked for an alleged Iranian regime lobbying group is one of the individuals in charge of Iran policy planning at the State Department under Secretary Rex Tillerson.

Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, the Iran director for former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), has burrowed into the government under President Trump. She’s now in charge of Iran and the Persian Gulf region on the policy planning staff at the State Department.

To make matters worse, Nowrouzzadeh is a former employee of the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC), a non-profit that is accused of being a lobbying group for the Iranian regime. NIAC’s current president, Trita Parsi, has long held close relationships with top officials in the Tehran dictatorship. In February, a group of over 100 prominent Iranian dissidents called for Congress to investigate NIAC’s ties to the Iranian regime.

One of Nowrouzzadeh’s primary duties under President Obama was to promote initiatives that pushed the Iran deal. As President Obama’s NSC director for Iran, Nowrouzzadeh sat in on high-level briefings along with President Obama, former VP Joe Biden, and former Secretary of State John Kerry, as top White House staff crafted false narratives on the Iran deal to sell to the American public.

According to the head of a state-run Iranian newspaper, Nowrouzzadeh was an essential element to pushing through the Iran deal. Editor-in-Chief Emad Abshenass said that she opened up a direct line of communication with the Iranian president’s brother. “She helped clear a number of contradictions and allowed the entire endeavor to succeed,” Abshenass said of her efforts….

MOST significantly, the knock-on effects from the above greed and immoral blindness are being played out in real-time on Israel’s northern border – on the doorstep of this counter-jihadi expert, no less! And the reader should know that much of what has, so far, been revealed is merely the tip of the dangers at bay. Until then, suffice to state: over the past few days, having met with this and that counter-terror and counterintelligence operative, as well as with a particular media credentialed type (who slips in and out of Syria – poof-like) who returned to Israel with this and that too, the situation, aka “matzav”…מַצַּב, couldn’t be graver. In other words, as imperative as “eyes-in-the-sky” are, human intel is worth (more than) its weight. Enough said.

RESULTANT, “marching orders” to yours truly are, as always, to SOUND THE ALARM from these pages, realizing full well that this site reaches critical ears – in the U.S. and Israel.

MORE specifically, know that PM Netanyahu – skittish that he always is – is finally bringing out the “big guns” (read: Arrow air/missile defense system) because the situation is so dire.

THAT being said, even though an infinitely more Israel-friendly President is in office, the fact that Sahar Nowrouzzadeh – Iran’s mad mullah point-woman at State – is still ! running policy-making for Iran and the Persian gulf region as a whole, the masterminds understand that little has changed in Washington, other than high-level rhetoric. Thus, vis-à-vis encroaching on Israel’s Golani (northern) border – as a jumping-off point to invade Israel – is (terror) business as usual, never mind President Trump!

Image result for pics of death to israel death to america

EVEN so, Americans who couldn’t care less about Israel’s unfolding and impending war with Iran (for the most part, via its proxy arms) shouldn’t be smug in their safety. Not at all. As is known, the very same rallying cry “Death to Israel” is always piggy-backed with “Death to America”. Not for nothing.

BUT if still unconvinced, preferring to believe that the above death cries are merely hyperbolic in nature, well, think again: “Islamic ‘Sleeper’ Cells, Hezbollah (Shia) & Brotherhood (Sunni), Prepping Jihad In America: The Proofs” is a foretaste of the jihadi shit-storm coming America’s way. Believe it.

AND adding more fuel to the firestorm, the wreckage from the upcoming lightning strike (and at the time of their choosing, emphasis placed) will cause that which cascaded across America on 9/11/01 to appear as child’s play. Indeed.

YES, the proofs are manifestly clear that Allah’s Muslim terrorists are ever more prepped, courtesy of the “luxury” of 16 plus years which allowed them to burrow and to prepare the next earthquake-like strike across the nation. But the difference this go-around is that countless “sleeper” cells will spring into action on an exponentially greater level than 9/11/01. Guaranteed.

ALAS, is it unreasonable to press President Trump about his full-throated exclamation: What Happened To:”Worst Deal/Document Ever Negotiated”?? 

Image result for pics of Sahar Nowrouzzadeh

Islam’s Multi-Headed Monster Via Shia & Sunni Jihad:Encircling Israel & America. Confidential Report. Proofs. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WITHOUT going into too much backgrounder, it is intrinsic to note: over many years, Iran’s (Shia) jihadi apparatus continually receives mega boosts from official – and non-official – channels in the US. None more so than from Obama Inc. As to Sunni jihadists, the national betrayal runs through the administration’s inextricable nexus to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s terror hydras. Bullet-proof.

(Ben Rhodes, Obama Inc.’s narcissistic mouthpiece) 

 

IN fact, the New York Post aptly highlighted (May 6, 2016) via “This skilled storyteller duped America into passing Iran deal” the following betrayal:

The Obama administration cooked up a phony story to sell Americans on the Iranian nuke deal, lying that US officials were dealing with “moderates” in the Islamic theocracy who could be trusted to keep their word, it was reported Thursday.

In a revealing article posted on the New York Times website, President Obama’s foreign-policy guru Ben Rhodes bragged about how he helped create the false narrative because the public would not have accepted the deal had it known that Iranian hard-liners were still calling the shots.

The White House line — which Rhodes says he created — was that Obama started negotiations after the supposedly moderate Hassan Rouhani was elected president in 2013.

But Obama had set his sights on working out a deal with the mad mullahs as early as 2008, and negotiations actually began when strongman Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was still president.

Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, concedes in the article that the so-called moderate regime is not moderate at all.

“We’re not betting on it,” he said.

Despite having little foreign-policy experience, Rhodes, 38, a former aspiring novelist who grew up on the Upper East Side, was in charge of a massive White House “messaging” effort that fed the bogus line to journalists.

“We created an echo chamber. They were saying things that validated what we had given them to say,” he admitted in the Times interview when asked about the plethora of “experts” praising the deal in the press.

The Times article, which will appear in the paper’s Sunday magazine, notes Rhodes, who has a writing degree from NYU, was skilled as a “storyteller.”

“He is adept at constructing overarching plotlines with heroes and villains, their conflicts supported by flurries of carefully chosen adjectives, quotations and leaks from named and unnamed senior officials,” reporter David Samuels writes. “He is the master shaper and retailer of Obama’s foreign-policy narratives.”

Asked about his misleading version of the deal, Rhodes said, “In the absence of rational discourse, we are going to discourse the [expletive] out of this.

We had test drives to know who was going to be able to carry our message effectively, and how to use outside groups like [the anti-nuke group] Ploughshares, the Iran Project and whomever else. So we knew the tactics that worked. We drove them crazy,” he said of Republicans and others who opposed the deal, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Obama, the article says, misled the public with the idea that negotiations began because of the “moderate” faction’s rise in 2013.

“Today, after two years of negotiations, the United States, together with our international partners, has achieved something that decades of animosity has not,” Obama said last July when announcing the deal…..if you have the stomach, continue reading….

CLEAR as a bell. Out-sized hubris too.

BUT it was not as if some of us required confirmation – and from a braying narcissist to boot, who just couldn’t keep his trap shut – re the underlying sell-out of American interests. Israel’s alike. Know that they are one and the same on this very crucial national security issue.

TO said end, “House of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran” was completed in October 2015. Its underlying basis serves as a comprehensive national security report on the most catastrophic (and heinous) betrayal, bar none. Its documented evidence is self-explanatory. Read it, weep, and then take the necessary steps to prepare to defend yourselves against what lies ahead. Knock-on effects.

IN this regard, first and foremost, let’s catch up to speed. Incontestably, Shiite and Sunni dangers are knocking on Israel’s northernmost door. Never mind the nation’s other fronts. Afterwards, it is mandatory to connect these same jihadi dots to America, that which erupted on 9/11/01, even though implanted years before. Yes, the opening of jihad on US soil.

AS to what’s what alongside this investigative journalist’s very own front-line:

Whereas Hizballah reported on July 5 that Israeli helicopters had attacked Syrian army positions near the Golan town of Quneitra, in fact, one of the two Israeli “Tamuz” IDF rockets fired on July 4, in response to stray cross-border Syrian army mortar shells, struck the Syrian Ministry of Finance building near Quneitra, which housed Iranian Guards and Hizballah regional headquarters. An unknown number of Iranian officers were killed as a result.
On July 6, Hizballah sources reported a high level of tension at its east Lebanese outposts in Hasbaya, al-Qarqoub and Mount Hermon, indicating possible preparations to retaliate for the Iranian casualties.
The mortar shells that occasionally stray into Israel are aimed by the Syrian forces in Quneitra at Syrian rebel engineering units, which are digging an anti-tank trench on the town’s southern edge to prevent Syrian tanks from mounting an all-out assault against them (See attached map).
These skirmishes are put in the shade by the dangerous gains by Islamist terrorists in southern Syria.
Both ISIS and al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front have overrun the entire Syrian strip bordering on Israel and Jordan – a distance of 106km from Daraa up to the Druze villages of Mount Hermon….continue reading….

MIND you, the fact that Iran’s Shiite proxy arms are fighting Sunni terror counterparts to the death for hegemonic rule, it has zero bearing on their common and intersecting aims – the destruction of America and Israel. Full-stop.

RESULTANT, connecting geo-political dots which span many decades should serve as guideposts to all who seek any coherent understanding as to why/how the world appears to be spinning out of control. And it is.

TO wit, presenting, courtesy of THE WHISTLEBLOWERS (http://thewhistleblowers.info/) a summary…..

HAVLISH, et al. v. IRAN, et al. 

OUTLINE OF A CONFIDENTIAL REPORT

The Iran-al Qaeda Connection Before, During, and After the 9/11 Conspiracy

  • CONFIDENTIAL: Part I: Fact Witnesses Part II: Experts Part III: Evidence
  • I. VIDEOTAPED TESTIMONY FROM KEY FACT WITNESSES CONFIDENTIAL  Witness Z (defector: MOIS & Supreme Leader’s Office)  Witness F (defector: Qods Force officer & trainer)  Witness C (defector: MOIS senior officer)
  • Other Sources of Evidence and Information  Abolhassan Banisadr (former president of Iran)  Ali Mohamed (Osama bin Laden’s bodyguard)  Jamal al-Fadl (al Qaeda defector)  Tarek al Charaabi (al Qaeda indicted in Italy)  9/11 Commission Report (pp. 240-41)  9/11 Commission Staff  Declassified U.S. and German intelligence reports  Debriefings of other fact witnesses and sources
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Witness Z (Hamid Reza Zakeri) is a former High rank officer of the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security (“MOIS”) who was posted undercover to Canada and USA in the early 1990 s . He returned to MOIS headquarters in Tehran in 1994 , and was shifted to the newly -formed Leader’s Intelligence Office in 1999 . He defected in July 2001 and offered information to the CIA in Baku, Azerbaijan, regarding an impending massive terrorist attack against America planned by the Iranian regime in coordination with al Qaeda and finely he was move as an Strong Fact Witness to France and Germany by the help o f French Secret Services in 2001 .
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Witness Zakeri beside supreme leader of Iran Testimony Highlights Personal knowledge of Imad Mugniyeh, IM’s relationship to Iranian intelligence and IM’s role in terrorist activities Assigned to handle security for pre – 9/11 meetings between Saad Bin Laden, Ayman al -Zawahri, and others with senior Iranian government leaders, and personally escorted them both to these meetings Assigned to handle security for al Qaeda team that stayed behind in Tehran to coordinate with Iran after Jan. 2001 meeting Discussed the al Qaeda -Iran meetings with his superior, the head of overseas terrorist operations in the Supreme Leader’s Intelligence Office Personally observed models and photos presaging the 9/11 attacks at MOIS HQ Warned U.S. intelligence of the impending 9/11 attacks, including the ACTUAL DATE of the attack Provides documents he claims to have stolen from his superior in the Supreme Leader’s Intelligence Office in July 2001, just before defecting; documents relate to the Zawahri and Saad Bin Laden visits, and the role of Mugniyeh as chief liaison to them for Iran
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Witness F enlisted as a pre -teen in the Revolutionary Guards during the Iran – Iraq war, and was later recruited into the Qods Force, where he became an overseas “military” trainer. Posted to Lebanon in the mid -1990s, he liased with Imad Mugniyeh and Hezbollah, and to Afghanistan in 1997 -1998, where he became knowledgeable of the Qods Force ties to the Taliban and al Qaeda. He later worked for MOIS and in the Supreme Leader’s Intelligence Office, where he personally handled the post – 9/11 debriefings of Imad Mugniyeh, Saad bin Laden, and Abu Musab al – Zarqawi. Detained in 2008 in Istanbul, an attempt to have him summarily extradited to Iran was foiled by U.S. (Havlish consortium) intervention.
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Testimony Highlights Personal knowledge of Iran’s involvement with the Taliban and al Qaeda in late 1990s in Afghanistan, at a time when few were aware of their collaboration Assigned to security details of Saad bin Laden and Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Iran in 2002-2003; took Saad bin Laden paragliding in Qom as part of his duties Personally summarized the debriefing report of Imad Mugniyeh, in which IM detailed his involvement in the 9/11 plot, for the Supreme Leader’s office Member of the team that reviewed the post-9/11 debriefing reports of Zarqawi and Saad bin Laden and made recommendations to the Leader Describes for the first time ever the operational handling of Imad Mugniyeh, and reveals his Iranian codename (previously unknown in the West) Handled “special passports” provided by Iran’s regime to al Qaeda terrorists after 9/11 to facilitate travel to Saudi Arabia and elsewhere Provides independent corroboration of the “Shaitan der Artash” code name for terrorist operations against the U.S. (see Witness C)
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Witness C traveled in Ayatollah Khomeini’s entourage from Paris to Tehran in January 1979, and was one of 30 top officials who established the MOIS in 1983. He became the MOIS station chief in Paris, then chief of West European operations. Involved in the Iran -Contra hostage negotiations, he was accused of being pro -American and jailed in Iran for two years. After his release, he worked as a manager / procurement officer for MOIS front companies. C fled Iran in 1996. He became the prosecution’s star witness in the Mykonos trial, the first to name top Iranian officials in a terrorism case. He has since testified against Iran in re: the AMIA bombing, Pan Am 103, and various terrorism and assassination prosecutions. Frequently cited by prosecutors, his information has led to Interpol Red Notices against top Iranian officials. Witness C continues to maintain secret contact with senior intelligence officials in Iran.
  • STRONGLY PROTECT: Testimony Highlights Details of Iranian terrorist operations, and how they fit into regime strategy Describes the 1993 Khartoum meeting between OBL, Imad Mugniyeh, and Iranian officials Describes mission and structure of the Supreme Leader’s Intelligence office First-hand information on MOIS front companies, describing specific roles of named instrumentality-defendants in terrorism financing Provides information on pre-9/11 purchase of a 757-767-777 flight simulator by Iran through an MOIS front company and identifies where it was installed Identifies MOIS safe house in Tehran used to house two of the 9/11 pilots Describes origination of, and the MOIS codename for, plans for major terrorist operations against the USA: “Shaitan Der Artash” (Satan in the Fire/Flames) Details coded messages he received from Tehran in the weeks and days before 911, warning that “Shaitan Der Artash” was being activated, with probable targets in New York and Washington, DC Provided warnings to German intelligence of a major imminent terrorist attack against the U.S. at least one week BEFORE 9/11, including method of the attack
  • Abolhassan Banisadr was the first elected president of the newly-established Islamic Republic of Iran and served in that office from April 1980 until he was deposed by Ayatollah Khomeini in June 1981, when he fled to exile in France. Since then, Banisadr has maintained a network of contacts inside Iran and continues to work with defectors fleeing the regime. In 1996, Banisadr introduced Witness C, who had recently escaped from Iran, to the German court that was hearing the Mykonos case. In a videotaped statement Banisadr describes: The structure and goals of Iranian intelligence The modus operandi of Iranian terrorist operations Pre-9/11 ties between the Iranian regime and al Qaeda in the Sudan; The connection between Iranian Revolutionary Guards General Zolqadr (left) and al Qaeda’s #2 leader Ayman al-Zawahri (right)

MOST significantly, each of the above were high-level insiders within the Iranian regime who, for whatever reason, testified at HAVLISH, et al. v. IRAN.

CONSEQUENTIALLYwhen it comes to bringing down the twin pillars of western civilization, America and Israel, Shia and Sunni jihadists cooperate and collaborate. Effectively, as is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. And it is into this vortex of anti-American (and anti-Israel) hell that Iran’s proxy arms co-join with Sunni monsters, their counterparts, wrapping around each other, despite their centuries-long bloodletting.

IF anything, the intricate planning of 9/11/01 (plus many terror attacks over the years against US interests – both at home and abroad – but let’s stick to the one which penetrated the US like none other) exposes the dangerous nonsense that one side of Islam, one terror branch, is preferable to the other, at least in terms of American and Israeli interests.

SIMPLY put, Islam is Islam. Its prophet, Muhammad, a madman, continues to inspire legions of Islamic followers – Shia and Sunni – to wreck devastation and destruction across the globe. And the fact that the leadership of the free world is in bed with said nihilistic barbarians, well, the heretofore blood spilled on Islam’s behalf will pale in comparison to what lies ahead. 

BUT for the actions of certain hunters and diggers – some of whom operate in plain view, while others never surface – the western public would remain clueless and blinded. Basically, those who prefer to close their eyes and ears to what’s going down will continue to do so. On the other hand, some are hungry for truthful info and intel, that which the general public can never access. Thus, this is where this site’s connections (those which can be cited, and others who can’t be) come into play. 

CHOOSING to learn from them, or not, is your call.

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at THEWHISTLEBLOWERS}

NO Data, NO (Substantive) Vetting of “Refugees”: FEDS Forced To ‘Fess Up! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

PAR for the course, akin to pulling a mouthful of teeth, the only time that a glimmer of truth is dragged from Obama Inc. is when they are pushed against the wall. Inveterate liars. Reprobates extraordinaire.

Animated Pants on Fire

AS to their penchant for lying, well, it is tome-worthy. If anything, their modus operandi is emblematic of an overall pattern of deceit, that which rivals history’s most infamous gangsters. Not only that, said outlaws pale in comparison to Obama Inc. and their willfully corrupt surrogates. Indeed, their ultimate and world-class betrayal can be found within: House of Bribes: How The United States led The Way To A Nuclear Iran. May G-d have mercy on the innocents who are in their wake – Obama Inc.’s and the Mullocracy.

NOT only that, but along this treacherous terrain await countless minefields, and it is basically a matter of timing when they finally blow up, individually or collectively. So aside from today’s – soon to be revealed – “admission”, another tall-tale was exposed very recently, and it served to tighten the noose around the leadership’s neck:

EVERY time this site connects the dots re HUSSEIN Obama’s “rebels” (McCain’s pets alike) to their masters in Washington, well, the noose keeps tightening around their necks – and this is not in reference to al-Qaeda and offshoots! In other words, it has already been proven that the so-called “rebels” are not only aligned with al-Qaeda – eventually, they pledged their allegiance to ISIS – but massive amounts of US weapons have been “inherited” by them. Not only that, HUSSEIN Obama essentially gifted heavy weaponry (and assorted ordinances) to Sunni and Shia jihadists, after he ordered the pull out of all troops from Iraq and left the equipment in plain view. Resultant, they laid claim to the booty. Happenstance?

LO and behold, along comes the belated “admission” that al-Qaeda is in possession of “surrendered” weapons from the “rebels”, yet, the public is supposed to believe that it was a mistake. Oh, puleeze!…..

THUS, the question becomes: Why are they ‘fessing up at this point in time to the “surrendered” weapons, as indicated below?

Another massive embarrassment for the Obama administration, as U.S. officials finally admitted on Friday—after days of strenuous denials—that the latest group of “moderate” New Syrian Force rebels surrendered at least some of their weapons and vehicles to al-Qaeda in exchange for “safe passage” into Syria.….continue reading….

ALAS, true to form, when the fish stinks from the head up, the putrid stench can be felt near and far. As always, those who swim alongside said foul creatures are equally toxic. Stretching the analogy a bit more, in the same manner that DHS facilitated the infiltration and penetration of enumerable illegals into America, along comes CENTCOM and their falsification of intel! On and on the sell-outs accrue….

TO wit, did anyone think that Obama Inc.’s “refugee” resettlement program would execute its mandated due diligence, in effect, VETTING those who seek entry, and from Islamic jihadi nations no less?? Do pigs fly too?

THUS, as is said, the cat is – once again – out of the (lying) bag: (linked video)

In a blistering cross-examination of officials responsible for the U.S. refugee resettlement program, it was revealed at a Senate hearing Thursday that more than 90 percent of Syrians who apply for refugee status get approved despite very little data being available to check for security risks.

The officials who run the program also either don’t know or refused to say how many refugees have become terrorists once resettled on U.S. soil, nor could they say what percentage of refugees they are able to positively identify before letting them into the country.

Immigration officials responsible for screening refugees made an attempt to show that the process is rigorous and “continuously being improved,” but Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., dismissed the generalities and demanded specific answers during a two-hour hearing before the Senate subcommittee on immigration and the national interest.

The U.S. State Department, which works with the United Nations to send 70,000 to 100,000 refugees per year directly from the Third World into U.S. cities and towns, has long described the screening process as “the most rigorous of all travelers coming into the United States.”

That statement was made again at the opening of Thursday’s hearing.

But Sessions drilled down to specifics as to exactly what the meaning of “rigorous” is.

Testifying was Matthew Emrich, associate director for Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within the Department of Homeland Security.

Sessions asked if Emrich’s department had access to even a single database in Syria that could provide solid background records on refugees in order to confirm a refugee is who he says he is.

“Can you name a single computer database outside of maybe some of our own very small but valuable intelligence databases for Syria that you can check against. Does Syria have any?” Sessions asked.

“The government does not, no sir,” Emrich answered.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

Sessions pointed out from various press reports that Syrian passports can be purchased on the black market for as little as $200, and that nearly half of the refugees pouring into Europe are actually from Pakistan, Afghanistan, north Africa and other hotbeds of Islamic terrorism.

Emrich said in many instances refugees “do have documents from Syria, and we do have ways of identifying those documents, as she (colleague Barbara Strack with the Refugee Affairs Division at DHS) mentioned our officers are trained in fraud detection.”

Sessions repeatedly reminded Emrich and Strack that a top FBI counter-terrorism official, Michael Steinbach, testified to Congress earlier this year and admitted that the U.S. has no access to reliable law enforcement data inside Syria because it is has become a “failed state” where the U.S. has no “boots on the ground.”

“Michael Steinbach on Feb 11 expressed serious concerns with the screening of Syrian refugees. I don’t see how you can gloss over this,” Sessions said. “He said… you’re talking about a country that is a failed state, that does not have any infrastructure and therefore any of the institutions you would normally go to and seek data on these individuals, do not exist.”

Emrich said there is some data available, but not from the refugee’s home country, “and we’d be happy to describe it to you in a different setting. We check everything that’s available.”

“But Mr. Steinbach is making a serious point, that there are no databases to check,” Sessions said.

“We check everything that we have available within U.S. holdings. As far as I’m concerned if we haven’t overturned every stone we are in the process of overturning every stone,” Emrich responded.

“There you go,” Sessions said. “We’re turning over everything we can overturn. I don’t deny that. But you don’t have their criminal records, you don’t have the computer database that you can check, so isn’t Mr Steinbach telling the truth? That in many cases it just doesn’t exist?”

Emrich then made a startling admission. “In many countries the U.S. accepts refugees from, the country did not have extensive data holdings,” he said.

“I’m asking you to talk to the American people,” Sessions said. “The American people are asking you a question. I know what Mr. Steinbach said. So aren’t you left with basically looking at whatever document they produce and whatever they tell you?”

Emrich said he could assure the American people “that we have a robust screening process and these processes are continually reviewed and upgraded whenever possible, and it includes an in-depth interview with a trained U.S. government officer and is accompanied by an additional interview, an inspection rather, when the person presents him or herself at a U.S. port of entry.”

Sessions, a former federal prosecutor, again dug in his heels and would not accept Emrich’s answer.

“I’ve been in law enforcement for 15 years,” Sessions said. “I know how the national crime information system works, I know how these checks are conducted. There’s no way you can do background checks on these people. If you get a hit on a background check, you can reject that person, but you have only a miniscule number of people who have been identified in that fashion, so I don’t believe you can tell us with any certainty that that person is who he says he is. So aren’t you left with looking at whatever document they produce?

“Is there any way you can actually send someone to Iraq or Syria and see if someone actually lived on the street where they said they lived, or actually had the job he claims to have had?”

Emrich said his department does not have the ability to send an investigator to Syria but relies on biometric and biographical information.

“I’m sure there are things you can do, but are you saying you can independently verify with positive data on the majority of cases?” Sessions asked. “Can you give me a number? Is it 50 percent, 60 percent, 80 percent?”

“I can’t give you a number sir,” said Strack.

“And the reason is, you don’t have the ability,” Sessions concluded. “I wish you did, but you don’t.”

Turning to terror

Sessions then went down a list of refugees who turned into terrorists after they were resettled in the United States. He mentioned six Somali men from Minnesota charged last week, an Uzbek Muslim refugee in Idaho who was convicted in August for making bombs and recruiting other Muslims to attack U.S. military installations, seven others in Minnesota charged with trying to join ISIS, among dozens of others.

“The problems we face are here, now,” he said. “This is not just scare tactics. A coach in Minneapolis said ‘there are monsters out there,’ more than 20 young (refugees) from Minnesota between 2007 and 2009 left to join al-Shabab (an al-Qaida affiliate in Somalia). And in the past year disappearances began again, this time to the Islamic State. Ms. Strack and Mr. Emrich you don’t have the ability to do security checks on these people.”

Sessions asked, “Can any of you tell me of the number of persons granted refugee status since 2001 who have been affiliated with terrorist activity?”

Neither Strack, nor Emrich nor the other officials testifying Thursday could answer that question. Among those who sat mum was Robert Carey, director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement which operates within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

“Well we have a lot of public records on them,” Sessions said, “certainly not complete.”

Sessions’ subcommittee established a list of 72 men arrested between July 2014 and July 30, 2015, who were charged with terrorist activity and appear to be immigrants from Muslim nations.

More than 73 percent of refugees receive food stamps, and the figures are even higher among refugees from the Middle East, Sessions said, citing a congressional research office report.

 

welfare usage by ME refugeesLarry Bartlett, director of admissions for the U.S. State Department’s refugee program, said most of the refugees have been coming from Iraq, Bhutan, Burma and the Democratic Republic of Congo with Syria now added to the mix.

Sessions cited a Washington Post article that said the Tsarnaev family arrived in the United States in 2002 as refugees and their two sons came a short time later. They were actually asylum seekers, which is a similar but different category of immigrant. Their two sons grew up and became the Boston Marathon bombers.

Kerry said refugees are resettled in 173 cities in 48 states.

Sessions asked if local cities and towns are consulted before refugees arrive.

“What’s your policy on that and can you assure us that any community that will receive a direct flow of refugees will be consulted?”

Bartlett said quarterly briefings are conducted.

“We have 320 resettlement affiliates and we require them to do consultations each quarter of the year with elected officials, the city council and mayor, school officials, hospitals and health clinics, law enforcement and any volunteer groups supporting refugees,” he said. “That takes place quarterly, and includes a representative of the state government, usually the governor’s office.”

Democrats call for more refugees, shorter screening period

Senate Democrats on the committee, Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Al Franken, D-Minn., asked almost no questions during the rare oversight hearing and used their time to comment on the tear-jerking photos of refugees in Europe.

Klobuchar said she was “very proud” of the Vietnamese and Somalis who came to Minnesota as refugees and are now “a very important part of the fabric of our state.” She did not mention the more than 50 Somalis who have left or tried to leave the country to try to join the ranks of foreign Islamic terrorist organizations, nor did she mention the dozens of others who have been tried and convicted in her state for offering material support to Islamic terrorist organizations.

The Democrats focused their emotion-based stories of desperate women and children seeking a better life, when the U.N. statistics show that 75 percent of the migrants flooding into Europe are men between the ages of 18 and 45.

Blumenthal said he’d like to see the screening process, which now lasts 18 to 24 months, dramatically shortened and reformed.

“My feeling is the American people still believe that we are the nation of the Statue of Liberty, that we have arms open for people that want to come here to escape persecution and conflict,” Blumenthal said.

(Refugees flooding Germany but U.S. ‘not doing enough’ said Senate Democrats during an oversight hearing on the U.S. refugee resettlement program.)

Refugees flooding Germany but U.S. 'not doing enough' said Senate Democrats during an oversight hearing on the U.S. refugee resettlement program.

No mention of persecuted Middle East Christians

No mention was made at Thursday’s hearing by any member of the Senate about the persecuted Christian minorities in Iraq and Syria. As many as 350,000 Christians have been forced to flee their homes, their property stolen, their wives and daughters raped and sold into sex slavery, often after watching their husbands beheaded or shot.

WND has previously reported that 95 percent of the more than 1,650 Syrians who have come to the U.S. since the beginning of Syrian civil war have been Muslim and less than 4 percent have been Christian.

The Democrats on the committee also pointed out that 18 mayors including Rahm Emanuel of Chicago have signed a letter asking the Obama administration to resettle Syrian refugees in their cities “because refugee make their cities stronger economically and socially.”

‘Faith leaders’ want more Muslim refugees

Another letter, signed by 144 “faith leaders,” was sent to Obama asking that the government not restrict the number of Muslim refugees allowed into the country from Syria or elsewhere.

Franken also talked about the photo of the drowned boy whose body washed up on shores of Greece and how it reminded him of his grandson.

“Many of our partners in the EU are formulating a plan to redistribute 120,000 migrants,” he said. “The U.S. on other hand has only accepted 1,500 Syrian refugees (actually the number has now exceeded 1,650), although the administration plans to up that to 10,000. I joined with my colleagues, Senator Durbin and others, asking for 65,000 by end of 2016.”

Besides security, Sessions said the cost of the refugee program is staggering. The cost of administering the program is more than $1 billion a year, but that doesn’t include the billions spent on government assistance programs and lost jobs for Americans.

“The costs are much greater Mr. Kerry than you suggested in your statement. While we had 18 Democrat mayors asking President Obama to send more Syrian refugees to their cities, homelessness has doubled in the United States. Every new dollar spent on refugees is essentially borrowed because it’s new expenses and we don’t’ have new revenue to pay for it. There is homelessness in New York City, joblessness, so I would say someone else needs to help (the refugees). I don’t accept the idea that we aren’t doing our fair share. We have been very generous.”

The U.S. has granted $4.5 billion in aid to Syrian refugees since 2012.

“Europe should be picking up the largest share of the problem and I don’t see it there,” Sessions said. “And a good policy should be to help keep people close to home, in Yemen, in Libya, in Iraq, so people can go home more easily when the time comes, and we’ve allowed that to get away from us. We need to look at who are we going to serve and whose interest are we trying to serve?”

RESULTANT, the Betrayer-in-Chief has been gearing up for the ultimate betrayal – atop his Iranian treachery – the swamping of America with third world infiltrators, chiefly, Islamic terrorists!

CONSEQUENTIALLY, how many clarion calls have to be blared, before patriots rise up en mass to stop the madness? Oh, who the hell knows…

 

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

House Of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Iran Deal - Kerry, Hassan Rouhanni, Obama & Ali Khamenei

DEDICATED readers (numbering in the millions…thanks for that) are aware that this investigative journalist enjoys a myriad of “relationships.” Some, though not all, are detailed within. And this is important to understand for various reasons, least of which are the shared confidences between parties. 

NOW, one such relationship exists with USA Transnational Report. Accordingly, this site unreservedly recommends the most comprehensive report to date on the (purposeful) nuclear-arming of Iran. Its documented basis will clear through the smoke and mirrors, that which HUSSEIN Obama’s regime blew in the direction of the free world.

ITS contributors include: 

Adina Kutnicki, Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Hannah Szenes, Right Side News, Marcus Kohan, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trevor Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo.

WITHOUT further ado,“House Of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran.” (pdf here)

“I think that the American companies will be welcomed in Iran… This is not a game for junior companies, and I call juniors anything below a billion-dollar market cap. This is a big-money game.”
– An American Portfolio Manager, July 2015

Table of Contents

Executive Summary
Preface
Background
The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee
National Iranian-American Council (NIAC)
The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros
Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster
Complicity of the GOP
Consequences/Conclusions

Executive Summary

The Iranian nuclear deal is a full capitulation to Iran’s terrorist mastermind Mullahs, and the latest in a series of betrayals of the American people and allies by the Obama administration.  At the highest level of the administration, Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor, the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, prioritized rapprochement with the terror state.  Throughout the process and negotiations, she had the backing of billionaire investor (and Obama-backer) George Soros, and his multi-headed network of tax-exempt foundations.  Their efforts were driven by deep-rooted anti-Semitism and personal greed.  Meanwhile, since the mid-1990s, a small but very connected Iranian lobby (funded, in part, by George Soros) has been laying the groundwork for normalizing relations with Tehran.  Operating through a variety of non-governmental organizations and political action committees, the lobby courted Democrat and Republican politicians.  With the election of (Soros-backed) Obama in 2008, the Iranian lobby had very receptive ears in the White House.  International business interests were courted and effectively bribed with access to Iranian markets, until finally the deal was realized, approved, and sealed by a vote of the United Nations Security Council.

Preface

Thus far, the reports and exposés issued by the New Coalition of Concerned Citizens* have focused on the threat posed by Islamists to American sovereignty.  The Qatar Awareness Campaign brought to light extensive influence network of the State of Qatar and their ruling al-Thani family.  The Betrayal Papers explained the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of the Obama administration’s agenda and policies, foreign and domestic.

This report will detail the sinister influence of the small, yet well-connected and very powerful, Iran lobby.  Though the Iran lobby’s highest level contacts are prominent Democrats, their reach spans both major political parties.  Like previous exposés, this investigation will mention familiar names, including George Soros, Valerie Jarrett, and the United Nations.

Iran is widely regarded by counterterrorism experts as the heart of Islamic radicalism, and the point of origin for terrorism with a specific geopolitical agenda (i.e., the creation of an Islamic Caliphate, much like the Islamic State, but dominated by Shiites, not Sunnis).  With the eager embrace of a legacy-hungry Obama administration, the Iran lobby managed to achieve a deal which makes the United States the de facto most powerful backer of Islamic terrorism in the world.

How did this happen?

Background

Since its 1979 Islamic revolution, Iran has been the epicenter of Islamic terrorism throughout the region and the world.  Immediately following Ayatollah Khomeini’s return to Tehran from France and ascension to power, Iran took American hostages at the embassy in Tehran.  In 1983, Iranian terror proxy Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in Beirut, killing 307, including 241 American servicemen.  In 1994, Iran’s proxy Hezbollah bombed a Jewish center in Buenos Aires, killing 85 and wounding more than 300.  Sponsors of both Hamas and Hezbollah, a New York court found that Iran materially supported and directed Al Qaeda in the 9/11 attacks.

In the decades since the Islamic Republic came into existence, Tehran has proved eager to embrace terror, partnering with various factions around the world.  Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, translated the work of the Muslim Brotherhood’s leading author and theorist, Sayyid Qutb, into Persian, proving that Sunnis (Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Al Qaeda, etc.) and Shiites (Iran, Hezbollah) will gladly cooperate in terrorizing the West.

Today, Iran’s presence in Latin America is also strong.  In countries such as Venezuela, Mexico, Peru, and Argentina, Iranian-backed Islamic terror cells work hand-in-hand with drug cartels.  The tri-border region between Paraguay, Argentina, and Brazil is Hezbollah’s main hub in South America.  Terrorists, cartels, and organized crime “move liquor, electronic goods, cocaine, refugees, even babies” across the region’s three frontiers.  Following the 1992 and 1994 bombings in Buenos Aires, western intelligence tracked Islamic terrorist activity to the tri-border region.  Today, although intelligence continues to operate in the area, the criminal activity is so rampant that local authorities rarely interfere.

Partnering with South American cartels and organized crime provides a revenue source for terror, while increasing Iran’s strategic footprint in our southern hemisphere.  It also highlights a unique problem related to the non-enforcement of security on America’s southern border.

The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee

The Iran lobby of today appears to have its origins in the work of two individuals.  One of those individuals is Baquer Namazi, who heads a central and critical Iranian non-governmental organization (NGO).  Namazi’s son, Siamak, co-founded the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) with Trita Parsi, who was a consultant to Republican Congressman Bob Ney of Ohio.

The other individual is Hassan Namazee, who was a major political fundraiser, especially (but not exclusively) for Democrats.  He is now serving a prison sentence after admitting guilt in committing bank fraud.

Baquer Namazi and Hamyaran – Corruption and Influence through NGOs and the United Nations

In 1998, elements within the Iranian government, Iranian NGO community, and international organizations (including the United Nations) formed the NGO Hamyaran.  It was conceived as, and operates as, an “umbrella” NGO for all other Iranian state-connected NGOs.

As one source explains:

“In addition to monitoring and controlling the Iran’s NGOs, Hamyaran is charged with channeling all contacts and relations of the NGOs with the international organizations and the UN. Under the supervision of the government, Hamyaran is also charged with creating communication channels with the Iranians living in the US.”

In a word, Hamyaran is Tehran’s organization to police and propagate the pro-Iranian (and thus pro-Mullah) message within the United States, and more broadly to the West.  It does this under the auspices of the United Nations.

Since Hamyaran’s founding in 1998 by Dr. Hossein Malek-Afzali, a high ranking Iranian government official who at one time served in President Ahmadinejad’s cabinet, the NGO has been co-led by Malek Afzali and Baquer Namazi.

  • Like Malek-Afzali, Baquer Namazi is closely tied to the government in Tehran. Baquer was previously the governor of the province of Khuzestan, in addition to holding multiple other high level positions in the government.  He has also held positions with the United Nations, including being a Member of the Advisory Panel of U.N. Center for Regional Development, Nagoya.
  • Namazi’s son, Siamak, founded the International Association of Iranian Managers (I-AIM). The organization is dedicated to recruiting high-powered “Iranian elites” in the United States.
  • Siamak’s partner in I-AIM, Ali Mostashari, was a strategic advisor to the Assistant Secretary General and Director of the Regional Bureau for Africa at the United Nations Development Program. He has been accused by reporters of directing U.N. funds into Iran for his own benefit and the benefit of the ruling Mullahs.
  • Siamak Namazi, with Republican consultant Trita Parsi, founded the National Iranian-American Council. It is arguably the primary lobbying arm of Tehran in Washington, D.C.

Like many of the Obama administration’s other scandals, it is clear from the facts above that the United Nations was used to supersede American law and sovereignty.  Furthermore, in keeping with the trends of Obama scandals, several tax-exempt NGOs were central to the plan.  This points to an inept, if not complicit, I.R.S.

Hassan Nemazee & Iranian- American PAC (IAPAC): Democrat Fundraiser Extraordinaire

If Baquer Namazi, his son Siamak, and their associates cemented the relationship between the Iran lobby and United Nations, Hassan Nemazee[i] was the Iran lobby’s man in the Democrat Party.  Before admitting to bank fraud in 2010, Nemazee was a star fundraiser for top Democrats.

  • In 2008, Nemazee served as one of Hillary Clinton’s national fundraising chairmen when she was running against Barack Obama in the Democrat primary.
  • Nemazee was eventually credited by the Obama campaign with helping raise $500,000, following Clinton’s defeat in the primary. He donated an additional $50,000 to Obama’s inauguration committee.
  • Also in 2008, Nemazee donated $9,200 to Biden for President Inc.
  • In 2007, Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) was the featured guest speaker at IAPAC’s annual New York City reception.
  • In 2006, Senator Chuck Schumer asked Nemazee to serve as finance chairman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Nemazee raised $119 million, helping to retake the Senate for Democrats and installing Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader.
  • In 2004, Nemazee raised $500,000 for Democrat nominee (and current Secretary of State) John Kerry. Kerry, of course, was the lynchpin in securing the Iranian nuclear deal.
  • In 2000, Nemazee donated $50,000 to the Gore-Lieberman Recount Committee.

 

Hassan Nemazee (right) with Terry McAuliffe

Yet Nemazee’s influence was not limited exclusively to the Democrat Party, and neither is the Iran lobby’s influence in general.   He and his partner, Alan Quasha had a history of giving to Republicans, too.

  • Before joining with the Clintons, Nemazee gave to Republican senators, including: Jesse Helms (R-NC), Sam Brownback (R-KS), and Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY).
  • Nemazee was represented in his fraud case by attorney Marc Mukasey, son of former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007.
  • In the 1980s, Namazee’s business partner, Alan Quasha, provided George W. Bush a spot on the board of his oil company, Harken Energy.
  • Quasha is a decidedly bipartisan donor: he gave to Bush and Gore in 2000, to Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani, and Barack Obama and Chris Dodd in 2008.

Hassan Nemazee was on the board of the Iranian-American Political Action Committee (IAPAC) until 2009.   Public disclosures of IAPAC highlight the bi-partisan nature of their enterprise; from 2008-2014, it gave significantly to Republicans and Democrats.

  • 2014 Total Spent: $87,668       Democrats: 63%               Republicans: 37%
  • 2012 Total Spent: $88,264       Democrats: 59%               Republicans: 41%
  • 2010 Total Spent: $67,609       Democrats: 46%               Republicans: 38%
  • 2008 Total Spent: $395,852     Democrats: 52%               Republicans: 48%
  • 2006 Total Spent: $263,579     Democrats: 58%               Republicans: 42%
  • 2004 Total Spent: $224,871     Democrats: 42%               Republicans: 58%

Source: OpenSecrets.org

(See here for more information related to IAPAC campaign contributions; also available on a per-candidate basis.  A full list of IAPAC endorsed candidates can be found on their website, here.)

Note that the greatest sum of money was spent by IAPAC in 2008, the year that Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the Presidency.  He brought with him his Iranian-born advisor, Valerie Jarrett.

National Iranian-American Council (NIAC)

The Iranian lobby that convinced Washington to thaw relations with the world’s most prolific state sponsor of terror evolved out of the work of Baquer Namazi and Hassan Nemazee, as well as the guiding hand and money of George Soros.

The National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) is the primary conduit for Tehran’s lobby efforts in Washington, D.C.  NIAC managed to pressure the U.S. government to subordinate international security and stability to narrow corporate interests, access Iranian markets, and the revenues that it can potentially provide.

Let’s take a closer look at one of NIAC’s co-founders, Siamak Namazi.

Siamak Namazi – Background Information

  • Son of Baquer Namazi. Family is close to Iranian regime; in particular, they are a core part of the (former president) Rafsanjani faction within Iran.
  • Co-founder of NIAC with Trita Parsi.
  • Works for family company, the Iranian-based consultancy called Atieh Bahar Consulting (AB). The consultancy serves as a facilitator for outside business interests looking to enter the Iranian market.  It does so by brokering relationships with key officials and Iranian powerbrokers.
  • Currently the Head of Strategic Planning at the United Arab Emirates Crescent Petroleum. Gulftainer, which, like Crescent Petroleum, is owned by the Crescent Group, recently acquired a long-term lease of Port Canaveral for container operations.  It is in the immediate vicinity of a nuclear sub pen, a USAF base, and NASA.

The Namazi family business, Atieh Bahar Consulting, depends on foreign business interest in Iran to generate revenues.  Their work is done with the blessing of Tehran, and thus they are in good graces with the Islamic Republic and its ruling Mullahs.

Following first President Clinton’s sanctions on Iran, and then the nuclear issue, American business was blocked from entering the Iranian market.   Siamak needed a way to circumvent Clinton’s sanctions.  He found an academic partner in Trita Parsi, who also brought his critical experience as a Washington-based political consultant.

Siamak Namazi

In 2002, Siamak Namazi, son of Baquer, co-founded the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC).
His partner in this new enterprise was Trita Parsi, an Iranian Swede, then employed as a political consultant to Congressman Robert Ney (R-OH).  (Note: In 2006, Ney pled guilty to corruption charges related to the lobbyist Jack Abramoff, and served 17 months in prison.)

Beginning in 1997, Parsi systematically convinced Ney to lobby for the normalization of Iranian diplomatic and economic relations.  He did this through his original organization, Iranians for International Cooperation (IIC).

In the words taken from a document prepared by Parsi himself:

“The first achievement of IIC can be traced back to the summer of 1997 when Trita Parsi worked as a political consultant for Congressman Robert Ney of Ohio. Congressman Ney was at the time a proponent of the US’s isolation policy of Iran and had contacts with the Mujahedine Khalq terrorist organization. Mr. Parsi was hired to consult the Ohio Congressman on his policy vis-à-vis Iran, and persuade him to reconsider his position in favor of a pro-dialogue, pro-engagement policy.”

Like Hamyaran, which is at the center of the Iranian NGO web, NIAC is at the center of the Iran lobby’s web.  It serves as a magnet for Iranian Americans who are sympathetic to Tehran, and in many cases have a financial interest in normalizing relations.

NIAC’s Influence in the United States

NIAC has approximately 5,000 dues paying members, and access to tens of thousands of additional fellow travelers.   The below profiles some of NIAC’s most accomplished associates.

  • Trita Parsi – In addition to the information above, Trita Parsi has courted the leading presidential advisors, Republican and Democrat, including those to George W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama. In 2003, Trita had Congressman Ney present a “grand bargain” to Karl Rove from the Iranian government.  Parsi is a practical VIP in the Obama White House, reportedlyconsulting with Valerie Jarrett and advising both the State Department and the CIA.
  • Reza Marashi – A former employee of AB Consulting, Marashi found employment with the Institute for National Strategic Studies at the National Defense University, which functions as a think tank for the Pentagon. Later he worked for the Office of Iranian Affairs at the U.S. Department of State “as a desk officer overseeing Iran democracy and human-rights programs.”
  • Sahar Nowrouzzadeh – A top advisor to Obama on Iran policy, Nowrouzzadeh is National Security Council director for Iran at the White House. Prior to this position, she worked at the State Department and Department of Defense.

Of course, NIAC propagandists like Marashi and Nowrouzzadeh had a more than friendly audience in the Obama administration: they had a White House willing to finish their work for them.  The whole history of the administration showcases Obama’s and Valerie Jarrett’s infatuation with Iran.

  • Prior to the 2008 election, the Obama team dispatched former ambassador William G. Miller to Iran, informing the Mullahs that they would get a better deal once Obama was in office.
  • Obama ignored the revolutionary Green Movement in 2009, and let the Iranian government kill and imprison the reform-minded protestors.
  • Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State at the time of the Green Movement’s uprising, was advised by Trita Parsi not to support the protesters.
  • John Kerry’s son-in-law’s best man at his daughter’s wedding is the son of Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, the Iranian’s main negotiator in nuclear talks.

Minutes from a 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meeting make it clear that NIAC was in contact with and supportive of Hassan Nemazee’s lobbying efforts.  From the minutes:

“Goli Ameri initiative and the creation of PAAIA with Hassan Nemazee and others… Trita mentioned key Silicon Valley’s IA’s as having contributed… and expressed admiration for Goli Ameri’s fundraising ability… Kami wondered whether we could ask PAAIA to join us in the ‘stop the war’ cause.”

Finally, as if it was written in the stars that the Obama administration would usher in an Iranian nuclear regime, Valerie Jarret was born in Shiraz, Iran, in a hospital named after Hassan Nemazee’s father.

Trita Parsi

NIAC Action – NIAC’s New Political Action Committee

In the opening weeks of the controversy over the Iranian nuclear deal this year, NIAC launched its own political action committee.  A 501(c)(4) organization (i.e., tax exempt), NIAC Action “aims to direct money from the Iranian-American community, which is relatively well-off compared to other immigrant groups, toward more concerted political activism.”

From his earliest days as a pro-Iranian activist, Trita Parsi was deeply impressed by the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC).  Perhaps the clearest indication of the pro-Iranian lobbyists’ awe of the Israeli lobby was the name chosen to be AIPAC’s Iranian counterpart – IAPAC (mentioned above).

NIAC Action is “explicitly meant to counter the influence of AIPAC.”  Minutes from the 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meetingconvey NIAC’s near obsession with the Israeli lobby:

“Trita clarified the fact that AIPAC does not debate – they are all-action and only move forward with their clear agenda.  Alex raised the fact that AIPAC is successful in some measure because they operate ‘under the radar’ and employ the axiom ‘don’t do it publicly.’  ‘A lobby is a night flower’ quote was mentioned by Trita as another example of how to lobby effectively.”

Indeed, the origins and thinking of the Iran lobby have been anti-Israel, and anti-American, from the outset.

The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros

Billionaire investor and political manipulator George Soros played a significant role in shaping and funding the Iranian lobby.  As in the Arab Spring, Soros deliberately sided with the most extreme elements in Iran, who, like the Muslim Brotherhood, also happen to be the most anti-Semitic.

Soros, whose wealth from investing and hedge fund management exceeds $20 billion, has used his political influence to affect political “change” in multiple countries.  For example, in Ukraine, he has funded NGOs going back to the Cold War.  In Egypt, he was instrumental in ousting long-time American ally Hosni Mubarak, and beginning the so-called Arab Spring.

Likewise, Soros has funded, and supported otherwise, various organizations that have been influential in opening Iran to the West.

  • In 2006, the National-Iranian American Council (NIAC), led by Trita Parsi, received $50,000 from Soros’s Open Society Institute.
  • In 2009, NIAC received $125,000 from the Open Society Institute, and an additional $25,000 from its foundation, the Foundation to Promote Open Society.
  • Minutes from a 2007 NIAC Board of Directors meeting indicate that Parsi spent a weekend strategizing with Steve Clemons(spelled “Clemence” in linked document) of the Soros-funded New America Foundation. They discussed how to counter the $75 million that the U.S. government had allocated to support regime change in Iran.
  • NIAC hosted Ambassador Thomas Pickering to lead a panel discussion on “finding the nuclear fix,” a reference to Iran’s standoff with the West. Not only is Pickering a trustee at Soros’ International Crisis Group, but he helped cover up the Benghazi scandal, and has ties to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (a Muslim Brotherhood front organization).
  • In June 2015, Pickering argued on NPR that the Iranian nuclear deal was good policy.

Soros and the National Endowment for Democracy

Moreover, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is known to be closely associated with George Soros.  It also funded NIAC.

In 2012, documents released by a Malaysian press outfit detailed receiving grants from the National Endowment for Democracy.  Evidencing the corruption that Soros money brings to media, a former news editor of the outfit had resigned a decade earlier because of the NED’s relationship with Soros.

Similarly, NED’s connection to Soros and various “color revolutions,” which have occurred since 2000 (e.g., Georgia’s 2003 Rose Revolution and Ukraine’s 2004 Orange Revolution), caused Russia to ban the NED this summer.

  • NED is technically a private institution that receives an annual appropriation from the U.S. Congress through the State Department. Many speculate it is also funded privately by Soros.
  • In 2002, shortly after NIAC was formed by Trita Parsi and Siamak Namazi, the National Endowment for Democracyexpedited an application for grant money to NIAC.
  • NIAC is estimated to have received approximately $200,000 in grants from the NED.
  • NIAC’s spent the NED grant money on sending two NIAC members to work with Baquer Namazi’s Hamyaran, the Iranian government’s umbrella NGO. Allegedly NIAC was teaching Hamyaran to use “computer based digital media.”

The Ploughshares Fund

The Ploughshares Fund, an international charity, characterizes itself as “a global security foundation.  [Ploughshares] support[s] experts and advocates who implement smart strategies to secure a more peaceful world, including one free of nuclear weapons.”

The Ploughshares Fund describes the Iranian nuclear deal as “a major advance for global security.”  Joe Cirincione, its president, is quoted as saying on July 14, 2015:

“This is a very good deal. It is a major victory for American national security. We have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to stop Iran from building a nuclear bomb, without putting a single U.S. soldier in harm’s way.”

The Ploughshares Fund, besides being a strong proponent of the Iranian nuclear deal, is a Soros-funded operation, with several key connections to American policy makers, and NIAC.

  • Former Secretary of Defense under Obama, Chuck Hagel (a Republican), was on the Board of the Ploughshares Fund when nominated by Obama. (He joined Ploughshares in 2009.)  Ploughshares applauded his nomination to Secretary of Defense.
  • One of the primary advocates of the Iranian nuclear deal for the Obama administration is Robert Creamer. The Wall Street Journal reviewed a transcript of a conference call hosted by Ploughshares, which quoted Creamer as saying: “The other side will go crazy. We have to be really clear that it’s a good deal.”
  • According to Aaron Klein at WND, “a primary Ploughshares donor is the Tides Foundation, a money tunnel in which leftist donors provide funds to finance other radical groups. Tides is itself funded by Soros.”
  • One of Ploughshares other benefactors is Soros’s Open Society Institute.
  • The Ploughshares Fund has partnered with other Soros-funded and anti-Israel groups including Code Pink, the Institute for Policy Studies, and the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation.
  • Former CIA covert officer Valerie Plame, who accused President George W. Bush of outing her in an attempt to intimidate, was hired by Ploughshares Fund in September 2015. In fact, it was Undersecretary of State, Richard Armitage, who, while serving under Colin Powell, “outed” Plame.  The manufactured scandal was used to smear and discredit President Bush, who, at the time, was trying to counter Iran’s influence in Iraq.
  • Powell has come out in support of the Iranian nuclear deal: his support is touted by Ploughshares.
  • Finally, a recent attack piece on one of the deal’s critics provides additional evidence of Soros’s determination to seal the deal. Media Matters, a Soros-funded operation, published a weak retort to an exposé in The Daily Beast.   Among other claims, it attempts to dismiss the overwhelmingly obvious connection between the Namazis and NIAC.

On more than one occasion (see here and here), Soros has used his relationship with the American government for his own financial benefit.  Opening Iran, with the world’s second largest natural gas reserves and fourth largest oil reserves, could prove a windfall for businesses with the right political connections.

Is it Soros’s greed that caused him to support this deal?  Is it his anti-Semitism?  Perhaps, most likely, it is the twisted intersection of both.

Martin Indyk: The Soros-linked, Foreign-funded Salesman for the Iranian Deal

Ambassador Martin Indyk has served as U.S. Ambassador to Israel twice (April 1995 to September 1997 and January 2000 to July 2001), appointed both times by President Bill Clinton.  In July 2013, when Indyk was at the Brookings Institution, Obama appointed Indyk to be Washington’s special Middle East envoy for the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.  Indyk has been a vocal critic of Israel – to the point of being insulting – and one of the strongest voices in favor of the Iranian nuclear deal.

  • Indyk is the Executive Vice President at the Brookings Institution and a founding director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings (located in Doha, Qatar).
  • The President of the Brookings Institution is Strobe Talbott, a friend and advisor of George Soros who has interviewed him on the War on Terror.
  • In September 2014, The New York Times ran a story about the influence of foreign governments on American think tanks. The Brookings Institution was one of their focuses.
  • In March 2013, Indyk was a panelist at the Soros-funded Center for American Progress. The topic of the discussion was U.S. policy in the Middle East.
  • In 2013, while Indyk was serving as Obama’s special envoy, the Brookings Institution accepted a $14.8 million check from the State of Qatar, a known backer of Hamas in Gaza.
  • Indyk has a history of degrading and insulting comments directed at Israel. He has used the analogy of the United States as a “circus master” who “crack[s] the whip” and gets Israel and other countries in the Middle East to “move around in an orderly fashion.”
  • He has also justified terrorist violence against Israelis, calling it “a plausible safety valve” through which Palestinians can “vent their anger.”

On the topic of the Iran nuclear deal, Indyk has written a pro-deal position paper for Brookings, the most influential think tank in Washington, D.C., (Parts One and Two).  Calling for collaboration with the terror state as a means to avoid war, Indyk writes, “Without an agreement, it is impossible to imagine cooperation with Iran on regional issues… With an agreement, collaboration . . . becomes possible.”

martin indyk

The folly of engaging a soon-to-be nuclear terror state notwithstanding, Indyk proved that he was completely uninterested in the Israeli perspective (which is driven by self-preservation) through an interchange with the former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren.  Following the release of Oren’s book, in which he criticized the Obama administration, Indyk penned a critical review for Foreign Affairs.  He then verbally sparred with Oren on CNN.  Throughout, there is little indication that Israeli and regional (e.g., Jordanian, Saudi Arabian, Egyptian) security concerns figure into Ambassador Indyk’s thinking.

Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster

President Obama’s Senior Advisor is the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett.  It was Jarrett who, when working for Mayor Richard Daley in Chicago, first introduced a young Michelle Robinson to Barack Obama.  Ever since then, her influence over the first couple is legendary.  Likely as a result of this domineering influence, other Presidential advisors do not trust Jarrett, nor appreciate her voice in Obama’s ear.  In the words of one former administration official, other presidential advisors “think she’s a spy.”

Reinforcing this view of Jarrett, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), says in regard to Jarrett “She seems to have her tentacles into every issue and every topic… Her name ultimately always comes up.”

The Iranian deal is no exception to the rule:

  • In 2012, news broke that Valerie Jarrett had been acting personally as an emissary to Iran. According to the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot, Jarrett held meetings with Iranian officials in Bahrain over a period of several months.
  • A month prior to the report in Yediot Ahronot, an unnamed source reported that negotiations between Iran and the United States had occurred in Doha, Qatar. (Note: Doha is the home of the Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual leader, Yusuf al-Qaradawi.  It is also where the Taliban opened an embassy in 2013.)  In hindsight, it is very likely Jarrett was the American representative at these talks.
  • Former Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, wrote in his memoir that Jarrett (as well as other advisors such as David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs) “[has] a role in national security decision making that I had not previously experienced.”
  • Jarrett has earned the menacing nickname “Night Stalker” because of her exclusive, regular visits to the White House’s private residence after dark.
  • Gen. Paul E. Vallely (Ret.) believes that Valerie Jarrett is responsible for the purge of top-level military commanders over the last several years.
  • Jarrett comes from a family of spies, subversives, and aspirational totalitarians. The FBI had a lengthy file on Jarrett’s father, James Bowman, because he was a Big “C”  Communist Bowman, for example, was in communication with the paid Soviet agent, Alfred Stern.
  • Jarrett’s grandmother, Dorothy Taylor, was an early activist with Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood’s founder was eugenicist Margaret Sanger, who published in her magazine Birth Control an article submitted by Ernst Rüdin, founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene.  The pseudo-science of “racial hygiene” was the Third Reich’s way of justifying their policy of exterminating “undesirables” – the Holocaust – including Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.  (More on Jarrett’s family available here.)

valjar puppet

The elusive and mysterious Jarrett, dubbed by The New Republic as “The Obama Whisperer,” undoubtedly found a willing partner in George Soros to help realize her dream of normalizing relations with Iran, thus paving the way for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons.  Soros has provided the financial and organizational means to Jarrett, who controls the President of the United States of America.  Together, the two of them leveraged the Iranian lobby as a counterweight against Israel.  Throughout the ordeal, Jarrett’s puppet responded expertly as his strings were pulled.

In the haunting words of Jarrett herself, regarding Obama, “We have kind of a mind meld… And chances are, what he wants to do is what I’d want to do.

Or else…. ?

Complicity of the GOP

Although the preponderance of the responsibility for the Iranian nuclear deal rests with the progressive left, especially with Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, and George Soros, it behooves recounting the key ways in which Republicans have helped make this disastrous deal a reality.

  • Disgraced Republican Representative Robert Ney helped Trita Parsi to establish the National-Iranian-American Council. Indeed, without Ney and his connections to the establishment (including Karl Rove), it is difficult to conceive how Parsi would have been able to succeed in founding NIAC.
  • Several Republican members of Congress have accepted campaign donations from the Hassan Namazee-connected IAPAC (see above).
  • Obama-appointed Secretary of Defense, Republican Chuck Hagel, was a board member of the Ploughshares Fund, and thus connected to George Soros and various pro-Islamic organizations.
  • Finally, as Andrew McCarthy points out, The Boeing Company is one potential big winner in the deal. They’re also a big GOP donor.  Updating even a fraction of Iran’s commercial airline fleet would be a huge contract.  Specific language wasincluded in the final deal to allow U.S. aircraft manufacturers to sell to Iran, likely to benefit Boeing.  (It is worth noting here Boeing’s massive contracts with the terror-finance center of Qatar.)

Mitch McConnell and John Boehner control Congress, and therefore the power of the purse.  This gives them far more than the ability to merely throw sand in Obama’s gears.  If they had the will, the Iranian deal could have been stopped by threatening to defund Obama’s agenda, period.

Instead, McConnell lamely surrendered and Boehner passed a series of useless resolutions designed to make the Republican base feel good.  Symbolic votes, however, will not stop Iran.

The Republican-controlled Congress put on a decent show for voters, but has done nothing, and apparently has no intention, to stop this disastrous agreement from becoming accepted American policy.

Sellout of Sovereignty to International Business Interests

A few words should be included here on the legal and commercial nature of the Iranian nuclear deal.  The deal’s highly abnormal formulation (not technically a treaty, not strictly a U.N. agreement) creates a number of new paradigms that suggest American sovereignty was not even a thought among the negotiators.  Indeed, it is not even clear that American companies stand to gain much from the deal, in comparison to their European, Russian, and Chinese counterparts.

  • Instead of a traditional treaty, which requires ratification by the U.S. Senate, this deal is a complex of U.N.-centered agreements, overlapping with bi-lateral agreements.
  • Due to the deal’s unusual structure, the Senate was basically powerless to stop it. (To defeat it, Congressional Republicans could have used political guerilla tactics, such as defunding Obama’s agenda.)  This impotence was reinforced once the U.N. Security Council blessed the deal shortly after it was agreed upon by the negotiating parties.
  • The agreement included secret “side deals” that were not presented to the Senate. Included in the deal’s provisions areguarantees for business that, regardless of Iran’s compliance with the agreement, companies would be allowed to continue to do business with Iran.  The agreement also severely limits Congress’s ability to re-impose sanctions on Iran.
  • Almost immediately after the deal was complete, Russia announced that it lifted a ban on the sale of a sophisticated missile system used for air-defense.
  • Likewise, China announced that they would sell Iran 24 J-10 fighter jets. The value of the deal is estimated at $1 billion.
  • Europe is eager to embrace the newly legitimated Iran. Germany, France, Italy, Britain, Austria, Spain, Poland, and Sweden all have plans for Iranian business.

According to one U.S.-based portfolio manager: “I think that the American companies will be welcomed in Iran… This is not a game for junior companies, and I call juniors anything below a billion-dollar market cap. This is a big-money game.”

Yet, strangely, U.S. sanctions on the Iranian regime will remain in force:

“After years of painstaking negotiations and at great political cost, the Obama administration has created a means for foreign businesses to re-enter Iran—but U.S. law still sidelines all but the biggest American multinationals.

Even in the case of big U.S. corporations with foreign subsidiaries, any U.S. citizen employed by an overseas unit would likely be prohibited from participating in transactions with Iran unless granted permission by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Controls, experts said.”

In effect, the deal secures Iranian markets for foreign companies, while American firms still face complex legal and regulatory hurdles should they choose to engage the Iranian market.

Consequences/Conclusions

The information presented above demands that certain observations are called out, and conclusions drawn.

  • Valerie Jarrett, John Kerry, and George Soros have used Barack Hussein Obama and the Presidency to legitimize Islamic terror. Their plans were helped along by a patient and methodical domestic Iranian lobby.
  • The United States government, in particular the White House and Congress, are deeply corrupt. The representatives of the American people put a higher value on personal profit and reelection than they do on national security and the security of America’s allies.  According to a recent Gallup poll, a full 75% of Americans see “widespread corruption” in their government.
  • The sovereignty of the United States has been sold to the international highest bidder. Congress no longer serves as an effective check on treaty-making. The U.S.A.’s foreign policy is now largely directed by the United Nations, which is, in turn, dominated by the 57-state Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC).
  • The Obama administration seems to be more interested in the profitability of foreign companies as opposed to domestic companies. Indeed, a reasonable reading of events indicates that Obama viewed foreign business interests as his best allies in securing the Iran nuclear deal.
  • IAPAC (Iranian-American Political Action Committee) donated the most money to political candidates in 2008. This was certainly to ensure the election of Barack Hussein Obama.
  • From the beginning, the bi-partisan Iranian lobby was tied to Tehran, the United Nations, and George Soros.
  • The United States’ reputation is now tied to that of Iran, the most prolific state sponsor of Islamic terror. Unless a military strike cripples the Iranian nuclear facilities, the terror regime will very soon have nuclear weapons with which to strike Israel, the Gulf region, Europe, and any other enemy within range.

Finally, while it is impossible to predict the future, a few outcomes appear almost certain as a result of the deal.

  • War is more, not less, likely – the arms race has already begun in the region, beginning with a $1 billion deal agreed upon in September between the United States and Saudi Arabia.
  • The United States has lost the trust of Israel. Russia is filling the American vacuum in the Middle East and Africa (i.e. Egypt, Libya, etc.).
  • America’s traditional Gulf allies, who view Iran and their designs for regional hegemony with great trepidation, are rethinking their alliance with Washington. The ice is melting fast, and previously unthinkable alliances and/or cooperation at various levels are taking place.
  • Political Islam is fully legitimized, rather than reformed to be peaceful. Obama’s acquiescence of Tehran is in direct contrast to his harsh treatment of Cairo, and the reform-minded Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

Regardless of who the next American President may be, what will he or she do to rectify this world class nuclear debacle?

[i] Namazi and Nemazee: A Note on Names. It may be that Namazi and Nemazee are different transliterations of the same Persian name.   One internet source suggests that ‘Nemazee’ was the spelling of the name for branch of the family residing in Hong Kong.  Indeed, the Nemazee family was in China and involved with the opium trade.  Though the authors make no claim at a relationship, the possibility seems plausible given the same phonetics and overlapping relationships, interests, and objectives regarding Iran’s relationship with the United States.

House-of-Bribes-Iran-Deal