Obama’s COS Hooked Into Brotherhood Mafia.Egyptian Broadcasters/Nationalists Exhort:DESTROY The MB!What’s Going On?Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Truer words never spoken!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

IN the same manner in which rabid dogs choose their pack-partners, so too the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia views Barack HUSSEIN Obama as a jihadi-in-arms! For good reason.

NOW, when El Sisi and patriotic Egyptians called (and are still doing so) for the heads, literally, of Brotherhood Mafia leaders and its members – as soon as Morsi was overthrown – America’s Jihadi-in-Chief was (and still is) cozying up to the Brotherhood like a pimp to his whore(s). No exaggeration.

CONSIDER the following as proof positive, and as a backgrounder on today’s updated thesis:

The prima facie evidence at this site, which is the basis for Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fealty to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia (whatever country they rule from, even from within Washington’s recesses), only leads in one direction. The indictment herein is criminal in nature, being that many lives have been lost due to his support of their terror efforts, regardless of anything else. There is no way around it. And, if anything is emblematic of said charge, well, throwing Washington’s weight behind Morsi, as opposed to those seeking to remove the boot of Islamists, more than speaks for itself.   

MOVING right along to the defendants at large, this site has enough supportable evidence to gift to Freedom Watch’s team, as supplementary exhibits for the RICO case. Free of charge.

Exhibit Number One:

YES, the noose is tightening around Malik Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia terror-tied non-profit, dragging along the Islamist-in-Chief and all his surrogates! 

Exhibit Number Two:

NOT unlike blinded monkeys, the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” RICOdefendants are also being pursued vigorously in Egypt. The latest lawsuit by a super-charged up former prosecutor, Larry Klayman, definitely has legs. Can you believe it? You better.

Exhibit Number Three:

SPECIFICALLY, there are “8 billion” (dollars) reasons to conclude that charging Obama & crew – with Hill as point woman, in their quest to empower the Brotherhood Mafia and Hamas as a main recipient – rises to RICO charges, at the very least….with countless additional exhibits found within this site as back up. Seek and you shall find.

Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch and a columnist for WND, alleges thepresident and others laundered U.S. taxpayer money that was spent on Hamas (the MB’s Egyptian progeny) rockets fired against Israel….

MOVING right along – and in spite of the fact that the Brotherhood Mafia is propping up the Islamic State and President Erdogan’s seat as head of the Caliphate – the fact of the matter is that the Jihadi-in-Chief’s COS, Denis McDonough, knows how to cozy up to top Brotherhood players via way of Qatar. Yes, THAT Islamist hunting ground. 

ALONG this trajectory, Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s COS is very busy giving shout outs to their Brotherhood connections, especially since his boss got his clock cleaned in the mid-term elections. To understand what full circle really entails, please recall how deep their Brotherhood fealty is:

Footprint One:

INTRINSICALLY, many are no longer in doubt where Barack HUSSEIN Obama stands on the issue of Islamic jihad. But fewer realize that to accomplish his overall objective, the acceptance of Shariah law into mainstream America, “red”(left) hands are required. Yes, they are.

It is a national imperative to link all the dots (red and green alike), not only those which are seen but those which (seemingly) fly under the radar.

It is these “unseen” dangers which enjoy the FULL support of the Red/Islamist-in-Chief and his Congressional helpers:U.S. CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNISTS & The Ties That Bind: The RED Portion Of The RED/GREEN Alliance

Furthermore, the timing of their publication – the above new (old) red manifesto – is not incidental to the helping hand(s) from their chief enabler – the POTUS!

It is with this in mind that patriotic Americans must internalize the following: America’s internal fifth column, with the assistance of outside forces, are hell-bent on bringing down America. WHATEVER it takes!

Footprint Two:

PROTECTING America, Israel and western civilization depends upon countless others waking up to the insidious relationship, as such, it was not for nothing that Brookings starred with Qatar in a previous commentary:

ALAS, to understand what is at stake, one must connect the dots from deep within the bowels of Washington. Guaranteed, Hill is up to her neck through both her red and green connections. Significantly, Brookings is wholly “owned” by powerful leftists and Islamist forces. Damn them all to hell…

As for the significance of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s involvement with Qatar, two things immediately jump out. First, as a 501(c)(6), the U.S. Chamber’s donors can remain anonymous. That wouldn’t be nearly as disconcerting if not for the second thing; it accepts foreign contributions….read on….

IN this regard, isn’t it noteworthy that his COS recently intoned:

After the recent midterm elections in which the Obama agenda was roundly rejected, the President’s Chief of Staff Denis McDonough made a shocking claim when he said about what American voters will see as a result:

“They’re going to see Washington working better if this President has his way and that’s what he’s going to do… we’re going to do it any number of ways.”

So just what is the President’s “way”? Considering how McDonough has been promoted after meeting and schmoozing with Muslim Brotherhood figures, that “way” very well may include facilitating Turkey’s Caliphate.

Before his promotion to Chief of Staff from Deputy National Security Advisor, McDonough attended the U.S.-Islamic World Forum (US-IWF) in Doha, Qatar in 2012, an annual event co-sponsored by the Brookings Institute and the nation of Qatar. As Shoebat.com reported, while there, he embraced a man by the name of Abdallah bin Bayyah, the deputy to Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Al-Qaradawi has made no bones about wanting to re-establish the Islamic Caliphate in Turkey; he called for it earlier this year during a trip there.

NOT only that, but the relationship between the Jihadi-in-Chief, the Brotherhood Mafia and Turkey was noted throughout an interview given on the global ambitions of the MB! No mystery on this end, and decidedly VERY dangerous for America and the west as a whole.

Wolff Bachner: Ever since Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan came to power in 2003, Turkey has slowly evolved from a secular state to a religious theocracy based on Sharia Law and Islam. Erdogan has taken every opportunity to undo decades of good relations with Israel while supporting Hamas and Jihad. What is going on in Turkey and what is Erdogan’s endgame?

Adina Kutnicki: In answer to the all important question of Turkey, its position as a so called “moderate” Muslim nation and its relationship to Israel, a brief backgrounder is in order. Turkey has enjoyed a “pet” relationship within the west, ever since its membership in NATO began in 1952. And, while the honeymoon lasted a little over 50 years, not too long after Prime Minister Recep Erdogan took over the helm, in March 2003, as Turkey’s 25th PM, the government’s Islamist agenda (from a secular leaning/tolerant nation) reared its head. Their volte face was not done in rapid moves, but akin to the precepts of Stealth Jihad – incrementally, phase by phase.

It is essential to acknowledge that PM Erdogan is a devoted and dedicated leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, as elucidated at Aina.org. He is also President Obama’s BFF, and this is no secret. Indeed, it is more than instructive to view their relationship in global terms, particularly since the rise of Islamism throughout Turkey merges with its entrenchment within Washington’s corridors.

In the words of Commentary Magazine:

“Hamas is a terrorist group in search of a home. Uprooted by the Syrian civil war, and shaken by the Egyptian coup, the Hamas leadership has taken temporary shelter in Qatar, but that tiny emirate is showing every sign that they want the Islamist radicals to move on. So where would a radical Islamist terrorist group dedicated to the eradication of the State of Israel and whose charter endorses the crudest anti-Semitism turn? Perhaps to Turkey, America’s NATO ally and a country whose leader President Obama identified as one of his top personal foreign friends.”

According to Hürriyet Daily News:

“The prime ministry in Ankara was the venue for a meeting between the head of Hamas’ political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan today. The meeting, which started at 7 p.m. and lasted for three hours, was closed to the press. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, National Intelligence Agency (MİT) chief Hakan Fidan, Deputy Undersecretary for the Prime Minister’s Office İbrahim Kalın and advisor Sefer Turan were also present at the meeting, Anadolu Agency reported. The meeting between Mashaal and Erdoğan came around four months after their latest meeting. It came at a time when rumors suggest that Mashaal, currently in exile in Qatar, is searching for another place to live.”

As such, a perfect storm. A union for Allah.

AT the other end of the world, let’s explore, once again, what Egyptian nationalists want done to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – it ain’t a welcome mat!

The video below is SHOCKING to watch but potentially even more so because of what it portends. It is a compilation of Egyptian newscasters reacting to the deaths of dozens of their country’s soldiers in the Sinai last month, at the hands of terrorists. While there are several different newscasters, the sentiment of each is the same; they all want President Abdel Fatah el-Sisi to unleash hell on the Muslim Brotherhood.

As Shoebat.com reported after the terrorists struck in the Sinai, el-Sisi insisted that the attack was “foreign-funded” and that the source of that funding wants to “break the back of Egypt”, though he did not elaborate. The most likely candidate is indeed Turkey. After the overthrow of Mohammed Mursi in 2013, Turkey has become a safe haven for Brotherhood leaders who have been able to escape.

It’s worthy of note that the newscasters above are fed up with simple arrests of Muslim Brotherhood leaders and operatives. They want executions of those already jailed and the slaughter of those still on the loose. They believe el-Sisi has been too restrained and want the iron fist to come down.

For his part, el-Sisi is walking a political tightrope. Turkey has gone to great lengths to build the pro-Brotherhood propaganda machine. Unfortunately for Egypt, that machine incorporates the communications and directives of already imprisoned Muslim Brotherhood leaders. If the newscasters had their way, Mursi and the others would be executed immediately to end the transmissions.

El-Sisi knows, however, that Turkey has already been able to victimize the Brotherhood prisoners by generating sympathy for them, as was done in this video from earlier this year:

The calculus that el-Sisi is wrestling with most certainly involves the reaction of Turkey to the execution of Brotherhood prisoners; anti-Egyptian fervor has already been whipped up as a result of their arrests. Executions would take that up a notch for sure; el-Sisi knows this.

A problem for him is that if the sentiment expressed by the aforementioned newscasters is shared by the Egyptian people, his country may be on the brink of another 30 million man march in the streets that precipitated Mursi’s ouster. If that’s the case, el-Sisi may soon start opening up the gallows to satiate the angry masses.

If Egypt is ultimately going to go down the road advocated by the newscasters, there is something else it may want to factor into the equation. As long as Syria hangs in the balance, Turkey is still somewhat distracted and perhaps not as likely to focus solely on Egypt. Once Assad falls, expect Egypt to rest firmly in the sights of the one-eyed Turkish monster.

As Walid wrote earlier this year:

The two missing links for Turkey to establish the Caliphate is the removal of Assad from Syriawhich ISIS has been the proxy for Turkey as well as the restoring of power of the Muslim Brotherhood to Egypt.

If the Egyptian people are pushing el-Sisi to go medieval on the Brotherhood and perhaps more important, if el-Sisi believes that will one day be his only option, he may have a new calculus to consider. Should he do so before Assad falls or after?

WOW…as noted throughout this blog, Egyptian nationalists know the score and will abide NO quarter to Islamists who want nothing more than to turn their nation into a Mafia style ISIS run clone. 

THE question is: who will emerge victorious in this global struggle: the Islamist-in-Chief and his hench people, or Egyptians opposed to the MB? 

WELL, as an American patriot and an Israeli Jewish nationalist, this site is NOT in Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Washington-led corner. That’s an understatement!



Barack, Malik, Hillary, Kerry (et al.) & RICO Charges:Where’s The Nexus?What Are The Potential Ramifications? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

TO fully appreciate the charges of a RICO lawsuit brought by Larry Klayman – Director/Founder of Freedom Watch – against Obama, half bro’ Malik, Hill, Kerry et al., two questions have to be asked and answered: what does RICO entail? and what kind of (legal) juice does Klayman possess?

YET, before we proceed any further, readers must internalize precisely why this investigative journalist continuously refers to the MB as the Muslim Brotherhood “Mafia. It is not for nothing. It is, bar none, the most accurate descriptor. Having investigated this terror hydra for over a decade – in tandem with top counter-terror contacts – the diagnosis can be taken to the bank.

INHERENTLY, the Brotherhood operates as a “mirror image” to Mafia cartels, most infamously “La Familia”. Most westerners are familiar with the Italian mob, however, they do not have a monopoly on criminally structured “families”. Mexico is neck-deep, as are others, and quite a few have joined forces. Entrepreneur-like.

THAT being said, in the main, to be charged under RICO, certain very definitive elements have to come into play. Such a case, with substantive merit and more than enough reasonable cause of action – against the most powerful players in Obama Inc. – is filed with all due deliberation. 

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly referred to as the RICO Act or simply RICO, is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoingcriminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows theleaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them, closing a perceived loophole that allowed someone who told a man to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because he did not actually commit the crime personally.

RICO was enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91–452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted October 15, 1970). RICO is codified as Chapter 96 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968. Under the close supervision of Senator John Little McClellan, the Chairman of the Committee for which he worked, G. Robert Blakey drafted the “RICO Act,” Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, signed into law by Richard M. Nixon. While its original use in the 1970s was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its later application has been more widespread.

Beginning in 1972, 33 States adopted state RICO laws to be able to prosecute similar conduct.

IN effect, high level litigators, especially ones as well situated as Larry Klayman (having been a former prosecutor in the U.S. Dept of Justice) acquire many enemies along the way. Battle scars. And whether one agrees with his tactics, or likes him personally, is neither here nor there. But what does matter is his track record. 

CONSEQUENTIALLY, he is fresh off a stepping stone victory against the NSA, as a Federal Judge ruled against the NSA due to a lawsuit brought by his organization, Freedom Watch. Hmm. Sweet too.

(December 16, 2013, Washington, D.C.) – Larry Klayman, founder, chairman and general counsel of Freedom Watch and also a former U.S. Justice Department prosecutor, announced today that the Honorable Richard J. Leon of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has granted his motion for preliminary injunction against the federal government and the National Security Agency (“NSA”), enjoining the NSA from collecting telephone and other metadata, finding that the program violates the U.S. Constitution.

“This is the most significant case in the history of any litigation against the government,” Klayman added. Judge Leon issued a 68-page memorandum opinion in which he stated, “I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval.”

Klayman was confident from the beginning that the preliminary injunction would be granted. “What we had here was the greatest violation of constitutional rights in American history. I applaud the judge for his courage, and for taking a stand against the tyranny and abuses of the other two branches of government. The judge is an American hero. Not since D.C. federal judge Royce C. Lamberth has any judge in recent years taken strong and principled action to protect the American people from the lawlessness and criminality of establishment government leaders, both Democrat and Republican, who think and act as if they are above the law. The American people have lost trust in their government and hopefully more judges will fulfill their oath of office to now step forward to check the gross abuses of the ruling establishment. We cannot continue to live in a KGB-like police state.”

The case is titled Klayman v. Obama (Nos. 13-cv-851 & 13-cv-881), and court documents are available on Freedom Watch’s website (www.freedomwatchusa.org). Klayman is prepared to take the case all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court and looks forward to putting an end to the unconstitutional and Orwellian conduct of the government.

MOVING right along to the defendants at large, this site has enough supportable evidence to gift to Freedom Watch’s team, as supplementary exhibits for the RICO case. Free of charge.

Exhibit Number One:

YES, the noose is tightening around Malik Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia terror-tied non-profit, dragging along the Islamist-in-Chief and all his surrogates! 

Exhibit Number Two:

NOT unlike blinded monkeys, the “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” RICO defendants are also being pursued vigorously in Egypt. The latest lawsuit by a super-charged up former prosecutor, Larry Klayman, definitely has legs. Can you believe it? You better.

Exhibit Number Three:

SPECIFICALLY, there are “8 billion” (dollars) reasons to conclude that charging Obama & crew – with Hill as point woman, in their quest to empower the Brotherhood Mafia and Hamas as a main recipient – rises to RICO charges, at the very least….with countless additional exhibits found within this site as back up. Seek and you shall find.

Klayman, founder of Freedom Watch and a columnist for WND, alleges the president and others laundered U.S. taxpayer money that was spent on Hamas rockets fired against Israel.

The civil lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington falls under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, alleges criminal acts by Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.

Seeking $1.5 billion in compensatory damages as well as punitive damages, it accuses the global figures of “laundering U.S. dollars” to Hamas, which is officially designated by the U.S. government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

“This money has been foreseeably used to buy rockets and construct tunnels to attack Israel and terrorize and kill American and dual American-Israeli citizens who reside or are located in Israel,” Klayman said in a statement.

“The nation and the world have increasingly come to see that Obama views himself primarily as a Muslim and acts accordingly in favoring Islamic interests over Judeo-Christian ones, and the complaint lays out Obama’s history in documented detail,” he said.

Klayman said Obama’s actions “were calculated to harm the nation of Israel.”

“His facilitating and ordering financial and other material aid to Hamas, along with his equally anti-Israel Secretaries of State Kerry and Clinton, and the U.N. Secretary General, is just the latest deadly chapter in what amounts to criminal activity which has logically resulted in harm and death to Jews and Christians and threatens the continued existence of Israel,” he said.

“That is why he and the other defendants were sued under RICO and other relevant laws,” said Klayman.

The White House media office declined to respond by telephone to a request from WND for comment, instructing a reporter to send an email. There was no immediately response to the email inquiry.

The case, No. 14-1484, alleges the defendants conspired to send hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas “under the false pretext that this financial support will be used for humanitarian purposes.”

“However,” the complaint states, “as recently reported by Voice of America and the New York Times, the recent killing of the chief Hamas financial officer by the IDF confirmed that these U.S. dollars, only some of which [were] found in his bombed out car, [have] predictably fallen into the hands of Hamas’ terrorist wing, which controls and was elected by Gazans to govern over them.”

Klayman’s recent case against the NSA challenged its program of spying on Americans. Two privacy-rights heavyweights, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, recently filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of Klayman’s arguments.

The case has been advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Klayman sued the NSA over the collection of telephone metadata from Verizon customers that was detailed in documents released by intelligence-document leaker Edward Snowden. In December 2013, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary ruling that the program was likely unconstitutional, and the case is currently on appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

His newest complaint, with himself and a number of John Does as plaintiffs, is a civil action and seeks damages from the defendants “for violating plaintiffs’ and decedents’ rights, for engaging in racketeering and other prohibited activities, for engaging in international terrorism, for harboring and concealing terrorists, for providing material support to terrorists and terrorist groups, for directly and proximately causing the deaths of plaintiffs’ decedents, and for directly and proximately causing mental anguish, severe emotional distress, emotional pain and suffering, and the loss of society, earnings, companionship, comfort, protection, care, attention, advice, counsel or guidance, plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and their sons, plaintiffs’ decedents, have experienced and will experience in the future.”

It alleges fraud, money-laundering, mail fraud, wire fraud, conversion and corruption.

The complaint notes Klayman recently was in Israel when it was attacked by Hamas.

Klayman, it says, “was subject to terroristic threats, fear, intimidation and blackmail from Hamas, aimed at coercing him from the exercise of his legal rights in violation of the Hobbs Act by Hamas seeking to deny his freedom of travel and public advocacy and business activities in Israel and other activities in Israel by threats and intimidation aimed at coercing him as a person engaged in public advocacy and business activities in and with Israel to leave Israel and disengage with Israel.”

Other “John Doe” plaintiffs also were in Israel at the time of the attacks, the complaint states.

It explains that, according to the law, a person “knowingly finances terrorism when fully aware of facts that would inform an alert person of average intelligence that the probable results of their actions will be to provide funding to a terrorist organization.”

“One may not naively turn a blind eye, not even a president of the United States,” the complaint states.

It says considerable amounts of charity money, public assistance, international assistance and humanitarian aid is motivated toward ending the violence in the Holy Land, but it “gets diverted to the corrupt enterprise, and becomes money that – fell off a truck into the hands of the criminals actually causing the violence and their enablers.”

The complaint says all of the defendants know or have reason to know that “funds and material support provided to Gaza under Hamas’s rule are actually used entirely or in the most part to finance the acts of terrorism, violence, murder, attempted murder, kidnapping, assault, injury, physical attacks, and other criminal activity by Hamas.’

The complaint says the defendants known Hamas uses building materials for home-made rockets and underground bunkers.

The complaint also notes Obama knows Hamas is officially designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by State Department and uses resources it receives for terrorist attacks, including the $900 million the Obama administration sent to Gaza in 2009.

It even accuses Obama of “siding with” militants known as “ISIS or ISIL, signaling to the people of Israel and Jews and Christians that Hamas’ crimes against Israel and Jews and Christians are tacitly supported and approved of by the president of the United States.”

The case also names Malik Obama, a half-brother of the president who runs the Barack Obama Foundation. The case alleges the organization raises money for the Muslim Brotherhood.

“Two leaked classified documents show Egyptian security forces have been monitoring Malik Obama’s activities and they also implicate President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in the aiding and abetting of terrorists.”

Klayman explained the documents were entered as evidence in the criminal trials of former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi and other top Muslim Brotherhood leaders.

SO, clearly not one to shy away from doing battle, does anyone doubt that going after Obama Inc., in relation to RICO, is blowing a whole lot of empty smoke? Don’t bet against it.