Tag Archives: Adina Kutnicki: When Authentic Revolutionaries Hold The Reins

Fast & Furious: Its Links To Gun Control Via (Obama & Surrogates) False Flag Operations…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
12

U.S. leftists, via their hegemony over mainstream media outlets, rely on their mouthpieces to steer the “news”. As such, they are able – in one stroke of a pen – to fabricate actual facts on the ground, as they smear alternative media outlets who dispute said “facts”. Does Pravda resonate?

Most significantly, ever since Obama Inc. has descended upon America, things have gone from bad to worse. It is no accident. In reality, radical revolutionaries have been in place for decades. However, before the ascent of “The One” their power was burrowed within academia and assorted “think tanks”, mostly funded through entities administered by George-the devil incarnate-Soros’s slush funds. This is no longer the case.

As a matter of record, the following re-release of BRINGING DOWN America, by Larry Grathwohl and Frank Reagan, was necessary due to the ensconcing of leftist revolutionaries within Obama’s regime – www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html. The aforementioned topic has been given all due deliberation at this blog, and from various vantage points. As indicated in July 2012, when authentic revolutionaries hold the reins of power, the explosive results are pre-ordained – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But where does Fast & Furious fit in? More to the point, where doesn’t it?

Fast & Furious is emblematic (fits like a glove) of an administration rife in cover ups, most recently, Benghazigate is a prime exhibit – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/21/the-nexus-between-cover-ups-benghazigate-mirror-image-of-fast-furious-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

And since disarming Americans is their main aim, then it stands to reason that the Second Amendment serves as a patriot’s “red line”, its “holy grail” –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/02/americans-the-second-amendment-a-red-line-constitutional-issue-a-holy-grail-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Most astonishingly, the leader of the free world, in concert with his underlings (sort of like a Mafia Don with his Consigliere) is lurching from one anti-American disaster to another –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …akin to a speeding bullet train.

YET, when does a pile up of dead bodies lead to criminal indictments, even when they land at the White Houses’s door – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/03/when-does-a-pile-up-of-dead-bodies-not-lead-to-criminal-indictments-hint-when-perpetrated-by-the-obama-regime-commentary-byadina-kutnicki/ …alongside those of his appointed guns?

More specifically, when will the Radical-in-Chief’s lawless “justice” dept fall, under the aegis of AG Eric Holder? –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But if not for the above, any discussion of “false flag”, in relation to Fast & Furious, would be dead on arrival – at least at this blog.

‘FAST AND FURIOUS’ CALLED FALSE FLAG AGAINST GUN DEALERS’ – World Net Daily – embedded videos

Author says government’s actions are ‘comparable to U.S. funding al-Qaida’

WASHINGTON—The U.S. government running guns to Mexican cartels is “comparable to the United States funding al-Qaida to make someone in the United States look bad,” according to the author of a new best-seller.

Katie Pavlich is the author of “Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and the Shameless Cover-Up,” news editor of townhall.com and an expert on the Fast and Furious scandal.

In an interview with WND, she asserted that the Obama administration intentionally orchestrated a “false flag” against lawful gun dealers, the U.S. Border Patrol and Mexican citizens to give cause for more gun regulation.

“This is a situation where the government was creating a situation where they could blame law-abiding citizens, turn them into criminals and creat[e] this false problem that they could solve through gun regulation,” Pavlich said.

Pavlich compares drug cartels to terrorist groups like Hezbollah, and new reports say the groups actually are linked.

“This is a situation where [the Obama administration was] willing to put public safety in danger, get thousands of people killed south of the border. The only reason we know about this is because (Border Patrol agent) Brian Terry was killed,” she said.

Pavlich cites the history of how the government courted gun dealers in Arizona to work with the ATF to sell guns to illegal buyers – allegedly to prove that guns were being transferred from American dealers to drug cartels.

She notes how the ATF assured gun dealers that “everything was OK” and that the ATF was “going to make sure the guns aren’t transferred to violent hands” and “not going to Mexico.”

Despite these assurances by the government, after the killings started happening, the government declared that gun dealers in Arizona were responsible for the “murder and mayhem in Mexico.”

When asked by WND if the real agenda was to make American gun dealers look bad, Pavlich said, “absolutely.”

She said Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder “were giving us this false 90 percent figure” that 90 percent of guns being illegally trafficked to Mexico were coming from Arizona and the Southwest border.

Pavlich asserts that the administration’s agenda is mirrored in a 1995 video of Holder that shows him advocating “brainwashing” children to think differently about guns

In reference to the recent filibuster by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on the use of drones to kill American citizens, Pavlich said, “Fast and Furious was a perfect example” of the government setting the precedent and breaking psychological barriers to kill American citizens.

Pavlich is not the only commentator to assert that Fast and Furious was an attempt to curb the Second Amendment. NRA executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre said in 2011 that “Fast and Furious” was a “plot to undermine” the right to bear arms.

Former Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, in a 2011 interview with radio talk show host Alex Jones, said the government is criminally liable for Fast and Furious and described the operation as a “false flag.”

Pavlich said that since Fast and Furious, “Democrats have done everything they can to drop ‘Fast and Furious’ from their vocabulary” yet their attempts to press for gun control are obviously not hindered by the scandal.

She cited Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., who was an “ardent defender of Eric Holder” who is still out in front pressing for more gun control in the wake of the scandal.

However, the administration has been only partly successful in its strategy to use Fast and Furious.

Fellow Democrats such as Sens. Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Max Baucus, D-Mont., stood up to Holder in 2009 immediately after the scandal broke, saying they “oppose reinstating the ban on the sale of assault weapons, and we call on the Department of Justice to enforce existing laws before it considers imposing any new restrictions on gun ownership.”

See the following videos:

“Fast And Furious is a false flag”:

“ATF frames gun dealers”:

“Can this lead to impeachment?”:

 “Can U.S. government kill American citizens?”:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/fast-and-furious-called-false-flag-against-gun-dealers/#qWhIT9xMAvjIizjP.99

Rest assured, thugs-in-suits are ruling Washington’s power centers, chiefly through the White House and AG’s office.  Valerie Jarrett – his communist leaning, Islamist sympathizing alter ego – is deeply in the mix. And these revolutionaries are dead set on disarming law abiding Americans.

Many scoff at the notion of “false flags”, proclaiming they are the purview of conspiracy theorists. Yes, at times they are just that – conspiracy theories! However, this is absolutely not the case with Fast & Furious. Its essence lies in a definitive basis: creating a climate, whereby gun dealers would be blamed for death and mayhem; a situation wholly originating deep in the bowels of Washington; implemented by higher ups, so ordered by AG Holder, himself a lawbreaker of the highest magnitude.

Moving right along…next stop – gun control!

Obama & Crew March In Lock-Step With UN Thugs, Chiefly To Disarm Americans…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
11

Popular truisms are not for nothing. One can often extrapolate much from their intended usage, as well as learn from their bastardization. As such, there really is “more than one way to skin a cat”, even when things appear exceedingly bleak. But one must first recognize the dangers, otherwise how can one skin this or that. Precisely.

Yet, without piecing together all the (seemingly) disparate threads, one is hard pressed to know where the end point is. And this is no small matter. In fact, without said recognition the slippery deed will be done, bereft of a chance to massively push back, against those who seek nothing less than total submission – yours!

Par for the course, radical revolutionaries avail themselves of a potpourri of converging – to the non discerning eye, they can be seen as diverging – epicenters, as they bore from within. Rules For Radicals – www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rulesfor-radicals …is their “holy” grail. Their bible. It is more than worthwhile to print out the above rules, as they serve as a blue print. They explain the heretofore inexplicable, making sense out of what is transpiring before our (horrified) eyes. In fact, this American-Israeli has a copy of the actual book and studies it, as necessary. Yes, reading is fundamental!

In furtherance of the above, and as a tie in to the commentary at hand, learn “Adina Kutnicki’s”  lessons/rules herein, free of charge to boot. Less than a baker’s dozen (the number within the left’s rule book), but no less trenchant.

Rule Number One: Leftist dogma is the same world over, and don’t ever forget it – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/

Rule Number Two:  Western media is mostly in the service of radical leftist forces, and operates to the detriment of patriots. They are particularly fired up against Americans & Israelis, the locus of leftist rage – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/30/u-s-leftist-media-in-the-service-of-a-radical-revolutionary-obama-administration-what-can-go-wrongcommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Rule Number Three: Leftist academia has a death grip on the nation’s young, capable of upending western civilization – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/the-paradox-pitfalls-of-liberal-democracies-in-a-time-of-immoral-relativism-the-havoc-wrought-by-leftist-academia-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Rule Number Four: The company one keeps is emblematic of ones worldview/intentions – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Rule Number Five: Ones “roots” are, more than less, embedded, even if one states otherwise – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

And while the above rules are not foolproof, they are indeed worthy of all due deliberation, as they have proven their merits, time and again. So, is the following at all surprising, even though many will “see no (Obama) evil, hear no evil”, even as Americans become buried with evidence?

‘Disarming American citizens, Obama style’

Canada Free Press, Doug Hagmann, March 19, 2013

Presently flying under the radar of the American people is the much misunderstood,  deliberately mischaracterized and under-reported United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty. Considering the persistent multi-level attacks against U.S. gun owners and American’s rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the “Final U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty” that convened yesterday and is scheduled to last through March 28, 2013 should be front page news all across America. But it’s not, and for good reason.

But first, let it be made clear thatBarack Hussein Obama is on record as being against the private ownership of firearms by American citizens. This might surprise anyone who listens to the hysterically-pitched assertions by such Obama lapdogs as Chris Mathews and Lawrence O’Donnell, for example, who contend that Obama has posed no threat to private gun ownership as President. Such assertions are only convincing to those who have not done any research into this matter.Most people, including conservative Americans thought the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was a dead issue, or at least not a threat to U.S. gun owners based on a number of assumptions relating to international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. Like everything else with the Obama regime, however, things are never what they appear, nor are they as simple as we are led to believe.

Obama vs. the Second Amendment


In 2003, Obama voted in support of legislation that would have banned privately owned hunting shotguns, target rifles and black powder rifles in Illinois. While running for political office in 2004, Obama called for national legislation to prevent anyone but law enforcers from carrying concealed firearms. As reported in the February 20, 2004 edition of The Chicago Tribune, Obama was quoted as “back[ing] federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”Barack Hussein Obama has a long and well documented history on gun control, going back as far as his law school days. There, he was mentored by Laurence Tribe, a staunch opponent to gun rights of American citizens. In 1994, Obama was a member of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago based charitable organization that in part, is a proponent of various anti-gun groups and related agendas.

In the April 2, 2008 edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama was quoted stating “I am not in favor of concealed weapons… I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” As an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted twice against SB 2165, more commonly known as the “Castle Doctrine,” which would permit household occupants to defend themselves through the use of firearms.

Perhaps most nefarious and telling of all is what Obama whispered to Sarah Brady during a meeting on 30 March 2011 concerning gun control:  “I just want you to knowthat we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

By far and despite the intent of Obama-supported organizations such as Fact Check and Media Matters, it is clear that he is the most anti-Second Amendment (putative) President ever to hold office.

U.S. arms control via the UN

Perhaps most disconcerting about the present actions of the United Nations is the cavalier attitude held by most, including many conservatives, that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be completely impotent against the U.S. Constitution and American’s rights under the Second Amendment. After all, it is argued that to be effective, such a treaty would require Senate ratification and at present, such ratification would have a “zero possibility” of passage. Such thinking is consistent with a normal political atmosphere and an administration that has a genuine respect for the U.S. Constitution. Considering what we’ve seen over the last decade, does the recent track record of our elected leaders alleviate your concerns?

Consider that within 24 hours of his re-election, Obama pushed for a new round of international negotiations to revive the very U.N. treaty he visibly backed off of in the months leading to the 2012 elections. Isn’t this act alone enough to trip some alarm bells, even among the most skeptic?

It should also be noted that on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty,  concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.” A review of this four-page document reveals certain questionable assumptions on which that conclusion is based.

This is a warning to all Americans that the Obama support of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty can lead to some “UN-intended” consequences to American’s right to own and bear arms. Americans looking at this issue are failing to look at the larger picture, which is the ultimate subjugation of the United States to a global governance. This can most effectively be accomplished through the disarmament of its citizens, especially in the face of violent outbreaks as the U.S. and the world economic systems begin to unravel.

The machinations of the Obama regime within the inner workings of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty must not be underestimated. We must look at the bigger picture and the end-game objectives of the globalists pulling the puppet strings. All is not what it appears.

canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/53885 …and raising the clarion call is surely more than necessary, if freedom and liberty mean anything at all. Some more “proof in the pudding” – news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/032013-648751-kerry-announces-support-of-arms-trade-treaty.htm#ixzz2O7l3A6Br

But it is not as if this blog hasn’t fleshed out the Radical-in-Chief’s gun control designs, both involving the UN and in other converging ways. Specifically, back in July 2012, at this blog’s inception, an antenna was raised about the UN’s march toward disarming American’s, and with the Commander-in-Chief’s blessings-  adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/09/washington-very-close-to-subsuming-the-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms-straight-into-thuggish-un-arms-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-15/. How dare he/they? 

Ever since then, the topic has been hotter than hot, as related within all the attendant links –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.  

Nevertheless, some may be heartened by the recent “shoot down” given to Sen Feinstein, the left coast harpie, as she incessantly guns for total control with her radical revolutionary surrogates – pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/03/19/sen-feinsteins-assault-weapons-ban-amendment-is-doa/. 

No matter. This is certainly not the juncture to become complacent. In fact, doubling down is the way forward. And who said we can’t learn from our enemies (yes, they are) – townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/2012/10/09/obama_would_double_down_in_a_second_term/page/full/…using their tactics against them, as we aim for Conservative, Constitutional victory!