The Incalculable Price of Moral Relativism & The Co-option Of Freedom Of Speech: Its Direct Nexus To Boston’s Jihad…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Now that hell on earth has descended upon Boston
and the FBI is hunting down terror cells 
Allah-bent on similar mass destruction,
Americans must urgently reassess where 
they stand, at least within their own moral compasses. 

In fact,the following commentary offers much food for 
thought on this very subject -, 
but it takes a Renaissance man of Professor 
Paul Eidelberg's stature 
(found within - to 
place matters in poetic, yet sharp relief. 
This blog is more hammer and tongs, but 
it gets the job done. 

'Evil's Free Ride in the Democratic World'
Prof. Paul Eidelberg

The failure or inability of the West
to reveal the origin and general cause
of the Boston Marathon bombing by
Islamic Chechens reveals the
intellectual/moral decadence of
the democratic world.
This world boasts of freedom of speech, but its 
pervasive moral relativism induces timid pundits to 
remain silent about evil—whose worldwide manifestation 
today is rooted in the theology that drives
and sustains Islamic imperialism and Muslim terrorism.

Let us therefore recall these famous words of William 
Butler Yeats’-

“The Second Coming”:

"Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere the 
ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity."
How Muslim Hatred Closes the Minds of Pundits

 Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Secular democrats, whose self-image is based on 
their tolerance or abhorrence of religious 
bigotry prevents them from dealing intelligently
with Muslims who engage in terrorist acts. This
inability to confront evil is endemic in 
democracies whose colleges propagate moral
and cultural relativism.

But leaving relativism aside, fear of being 
disparaged as a religious bigot or racist
was prevalent even in pre-state Israel,
where Muslim hatred of Jews was not only 
transparent but also manifested in the
Arab murder of Jews during the 1920s and 1930s.
I am referring to the time when Israel was 
called the “Yishuv,” the Jewish community.

Referring to Israel’s pre-State period, 
Professor Gil Carl AlRoy observed: "One 
cannot help being astounded at the sheer 
determination with which the Yishuv for 
so long denied conflict with Arabs in the
face of conflict. There was an extraordinary
tension here between the empirical world 
and personal and group conceptualization."

Even when conflict was admitted, Zionists 
explained it away by saying the "Arabs did 
not truly wish it, but were put up to it by 
others [their leaders]"; or that Arab hostility
“was contrary to the essence of the [brotherly]
 relationship [between Semitic peoples]" and the
"historic alliance of Jews and Muslims."

Did not President George Bush say just one 
day after 9/11 that “Islam is a religion of 

One acute observer has said that on that day
the United States lost the war. What war? 
The war which America’s “politically correct”
(read intellectually timid or dishonest) 
politicians and pundits called a “war against
international terrorism,” a war which no 
public official,and no prominent academic, 
had the guts to call a war against
totalitarian Islam.

The ever valiant Prof has written expansively 
on the intersection of "moral relativism" 
in relation to Islamism and its twin devil
- leftism/progressivism. In this regard, 
let us recall the following highlights to 
assess where this evil is rooted, and then
its poisonous tentacles can (hopefully) 
be seen for what they are. Once the
educational process is complete, a 
conversation (through alternative media
and conservative think tanks)must ensue
which will allow westerners to demand
an Islamic  Reformation. Muslims should
be given an ultimatum: become loyal
citizens or get out. There are ways to 
accomplish this, but the will to do so 
has to be absolute. Westerners must be
as non-compromising in the values they
hold dear as Muslims are. There is no
alternative due to all of the above,
unless periodic jihads akin to Boston
is to become the "new normal"- 

In point of fact,Islam & Blood
(a myth shattering policy paper)encompasses
the entire political, cultural and
quasi-theological doctrine which underpins
Islam.It proves that Islam's tenets not
only justifies, but mandates a global
swathe of jihad, at least until "infidels"
are subdued under the sword of Islam. Is it
any wonder that Islam literally means
submission? How many westerners even realize
what its actual definition is - 
Perversely,western leaders have convinced
the masses that Islam means peace, and this
is precisely why it is always called the
"religion of peace", even as its adherents
bloody the globe waging jihad in
the name of Allah - 

NO less intrinsic for westerners
is the rot of "moral relativism",which allows
the murderous ideology of Islam to hide in
plain sight - 
There no longer is a distinction between
good & evil. All cultures,
regardless of their pillaging and murder, are
seen as "equally" moral. The above are the main
reasons why the west is paralyzed.Westerners have
become subliminally conditioned, therefore,they
do not have the tools to fight against this
struggle between civilizations.No sense
whitewashing the truth. 

Know this: at the end of this death dance
one winner will emerge - Islamic jihadists or
westerners. One will triumph, the other will
be left in smoldering ruins. As such, there
are many decisions to make. NO American 
(Israeli or westerner)will be immune from
its blow back.The open question is: do
westerners have what it takes to
actually WIN? 

NO place to run...NO place to hide.