DHS & Its Mafia-Like Tentacles: Blowing The Whistle On The Long-Arm Of HUSSEIN Obama. The Proofs. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


Screen Shot 2015-06-16 at 1.52.35 AM

EVERY time that the appellation Mafia is applied, it conjures up criminal intent. This is the case because its underlying derivative is Mafia Inc. 

NOW, it makes little diff if said criminal tentacles are housed within America, Europe, the Mid East or elsewhere. Rather, its basis lies in the organizing and oversight of illegal agreements and transactions under the umbrella of a syndicate. 

THAT being said, relative to the most well known of Mafias, the Italian Mob, most think about what they have seen on tv as to what’s what. A starting point. On the other hand, as dangerous as these “wiseguys” are, the fact remains that most who end up in their firing line – through intimidation and strong-arm tactics or literal elimination – are those who have “done business” with them and end up in their cross hairs. Yes, innocents get caught in their web, but that’s not the norm nor the point.

POINTEDLY, this investigative journalist utilizes the aforementioned designation with all due deliberation and diligence, ala referencing the Muslim Brotherhood and the administration of HUSSEIN Obama, Obama Inc. It is not for nothing.

STIPULATED, both operate akin to criminal hierarchies and all that it entails. In fact, relative to the Brotherhood, it has been proven to be the case beyond a shadow of a doubt. Effectively, the back up of said charges can be found in the “book of books” on this subject matter, “The Muslim Mafia.” To affirm that there is a familiarity with its contents and its author is a mild understatement. Trust this.

ALONG this same trajectory of understanding, let’s first prove that DHS – in its current status – is similarly bent. Once done, the latest allegations within today’s thesis will come full circle. Inherently, today’s report will further serve as prima facie evidence to substantiate this site’s own volume of evidence.


BACK in May 2013, the following was reported at these pages: “DHS, A Malevolent Anti-American Behemoth Targets Whistleblowers & Patriots: Valerie Jarrett’s Fiefdom.” Its contents are more than indicting.


BUT whereas the current Director of DHS is Jeh Johnson (and we will get to him), his predecessor was Janet Napolitano. Mamma mia! An attesting commentary was written in July 2013: ” ‘Mamma Janet’ Loses ! 226 Illegals Deemed National Security Threats: How Did This Happen?”


IN relationship to this same trail, Oct. 2013 included a follow-up to Jarrett’s stranglehold on DHS: “Targeting Patriots: Warnings From (Ret.) Army Officers of Martial Law & More.” Does it get any clearer, as to the groundwork being laid by Obama Inc.’s DHS? Not really.


SO, adding fuel to the fiery charges, guess what was found out in Dec. 2013? “DHS was caught ferrying illegal aliens”, thus, usurping its own “law and order” enforcement mandate! That’s what.


COULD it get any worse? You betcha. It was asserted in July 2014: “Obama’s Goons Silencing/Threatening Whistleblowers: Shut Up, Or Else.”




PAR for DHS’s criminal course, Mafia-like, they not only lie but aid and abet terrorist infiltrators, as indicated in a Dec. 2014 commentary! Believe it.


EVEN so, DHS’s (Obama Inc.’s) criminal behavior begs the main questions: why is DHS ordering Border Patrol to lie about Islamic infiltration? and what are they up to?

AND, as is said, this is where the rubber meets the road, relative to today’s concomitant proofs via the latest Mafia tactics against Special Agents who blow the whistle on the regime’s concomitant treachery. Still, before we get to another twisted evidence-based report, hark back to a previous alert at these pages, starring…Julia Davis. O M G!


ONTO the main nail in DHS’s, Mafia Inc.’s, charge sheet:


Inside any criminal organization there is a prime directive that says “support Big Brother in every way or their will be serious consequences to pay.”  It’s no different in the Obama administration. Time after time they are quick to punish anyone who dares to reveal to outside world what is really going inside their insidious agencies. Then, should you be brave, or foolish enough to violate the directive they’ll take your job, your reputation, and as in this disgusting case — they’ll even try to take your children.

A Department of Homeland Security agent blew the whistle on the feds . . . and they went after her with a vengeance! Now, she’s speaking out before Congress. Where will this end for her?

According to the Conservative Tribune, Taylor Johnson, a senior special agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs that she faced massive retribution after revealing irregularities in the EB-5 visa program. The EB-5 visa grants green cards to foreigners who invest $500,000 in American companies. Johnson, an 11-year veteran of the ICE, told the committee that she found corruption and mismanagement that, in her words, posed “national security risks.” Johnson revealed the following:

“Some of the violations investigated surrounding the project included bank and wire fraud, and I discovered ties to organized crime and high-ranking politicians and they received promotions that appeared to facilitate the program,” she also discovered that:

“applicants from China, Russia, Pakistan, Malaysia had been approved in as little as 16 days. ‘In addition, case files lacked the basic and necessary law enforcement queries.’” Johnson added:

“I found over 800 operational EB-5 regional centers throughout the U.S.,” commenting that this was, “odd because the United States only allows 10,000 EB-5 visas per year.”

Obama’s cohorts don’t take well to being called to task. After blowing the whistle on the EB-5 program, agency retaliation was swift and severe. Johnson was escorted from her desk and denied access to her own case files. The government then informed adoption social workers that Johnson had lost her job due to criminal activity.

“When an adoption social worker tried to contact and verify employment, she was told that I had been terminated for a criminal offense,” Johnson said, holding back tears. “I almost lost my 1-year-old child.” Johnson was also denied her constitutional right to carry a firearm.

“I was told I couldn’t even carry or own a personal weapon which is a constitutional rights violation,” she testified (H/T WZ).

Eliminating your job, your reputation, and your constitutional rights seems to be policy for the Obama administration . . . but trying to take your children?

VIDEO: DHS Agent Exposed Obama!  Feds Take Her Job, Her Reputation . . . And Go After Her DAUGHTER!


RESULTANT, akin to all criminal complaints, attendant testimony becomes part of the case file. To wit, please review this hyper-charged document, if interested in where the truth lies.

Testimony of Senior Special Agent Taylor Johnson, Department of Homeland Security, Office of Investigations (DHS/HSI) “Blowing the Whistle on Retaliation: Accounts of Current and Former Federal Agency Whistleblowers”

REGARDLESS of anything else, it doesn’t matter who fronts for a criminal cartel, be they Ivy League educated and tailor-made suit types (pantsuits or dresses, whatever the case may be) or “wise-guys”, some of whom likely never graduated from high school. 

NOT only that, from this well-connected perch, suffice to state: place this investigative journalist one on one with a “wise-guy” any day of the week, for on this end their messaging would be deemed more trustworthy than anything uttered by DHS’s Mafia goons. Absolutely.

MOST significantly, the amount of damage accrued under HUSSEIN Obama’s crew (on a macro scale) has an exponentially graver and greater quotient level in juxtaposition to other cartels, in relationship to America and its knock-on effects to the entire west. Consequentially, if the generally held definition of Mafiosos deserve jail time, what exactly do DHS’s criminals warrant?


{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}


THOSE unfamiliar with the underpinnings at this site can be forgiven for thinking – after stumbling upon these pages – yes, we have found ourselves in a parallel universe, sort of Alice-in-Wonderland-like….down the rabbit hole, so to speak. This blogger is certainly not offended, if some wish to pooh pooh the dangers away. It’s your right. Your privilege.

BUT knowing some of the following (silencing) tactics from the inside out – what’s the point in accessing high level contacts, if not for such insights – there is NO doubt that the report (featured below) is accurate. Not only that, the info must be considered as a last warning, to those who refuse to toe Obama Inc.’s dictatorial lines!

YET, the handwriting has been on the wall, for heavens sake, too many times to count. Never mind…


DO readers recall the recent plight of a concerned parent, a former prosecutor no less, who was arrested at a school board meeting in New Hampshire, all for the “crime” of questioning the (mis)educators of his 14 yr old daughter? Well, when the fish stinks from the head up, those in positions of authority, whether local school boards or what not, feel freer to bring down the hammer, to silence, if disagreed with! Can you imagine? Is this America, or a third world tyranny?


MOVING right along…away from the tyranny of school boards, their escalation continues from the First Amendment to the Second. Once both are gone, what else is left? Not too much.


PRAY tell, when whistle blowers are threatened and perhaps silenced for good, does anyone – in their sane mind – believe that the average Joe or Jane will freely be able to express themselves, without fear of jail, or worse? Indeed, a tyranny, a police state in the making!

SO on a very selfish, self preserving level, readers should sit up and take note of the warnings within:

Plug pulled on broadcast of intelligence insider-behind the scenes oddities revealed

“If that’s indeed the case, and only if that’s the case, then the dogs of war have been released from their cages, and we are quite far down the path toward full censorship. If that’s the case, then may God help us all.”—Doug Hagmann

by Douglas J. Hagmann

Saturday, July 5, 2014: We have the latest, professional grade broadcasting equipment. We have the largest of lines running to and from our studio capable of supporting our popular broadcast. We also have dedicated computers that were specifically designed for broadcast purposes. We also have back-up alternative power in the event of a storm or other natural disaster. Perhaps most important of all, we have redundancy in the event of a breakdown of any one “link” in the chain of equipment, and the ability to use the resources in another country. Recently, an engineer for a local radio station viewed our studio, equipment and the schematics and told me that it rivaled and in some ways, exceeded the equipment at his station.

Despite our investment of money, time and toil, it appears that someone “pulled the plug” on our July 4, 2014 broadcast before it was permitted to air.

At exactly 15 minutes before airtime, we were connected. All was well. The program clock was set and we conducted routine sound and equipment checks amid the quiet hum of hard drives and other equipment. An automated, audible countdown began at 14 minutes before airtime, marking each minute before the broadcast would air. We began making our usual entries into our log book and engaged in the routine, if not mundane practices that no one sees or even care exist. We powered down other devices, and silenced the ringer of the single studio telephone line we use for emergencies. Then, exactly at the 11 minute, six-second mark, something odd happened. We were cut off from the network. Due to the methods we use to connect to the network, however, we would not realize what happened until we were met with silence as the on-air broadcast clock began to tick down from 180 minutes.

If someone screams in a soundproof studio, does anyone hear it?

At precisely five seconds in to the broadcast, knowing that we were broadcasting “dead air,” we engaged in a series of steps to connect to the network through other means. We established this protocol last year after a series of sound issues plagued us. We activated “plan B,” and did so swiftly, but with futility. Even our scheduled guest could not call in to our studio as the line went dead as soon as he was connected.

As we scurried about in our studio, powering our equipment up and down, following the steps in an “emergency” back-up manual created for us by a local sound engineer, I fought back against a nauseous feeling that someone did not want our broadcast to air. At least, someone did not want this broadcast to air. We watched ourselves fading to black, as our computer studio interface failed to respond to any of our efforts, as did our sound board. We were completely locked out, so to speak, and were also unable to make contact with our secondary link outside of the United States, which is our final, fail-safe measure that has not failed us before.

By the time we completed every step possible, we had already broadcast nearly ten minutes of dead air. We were dead in the water, and there was nothing we could do and no fix to be made. We let as many listeners know of our problems through a chat feature associated with our program, and a messaging service attached to our new mobile app.

Our guest, the “red phone” and S.W.A.T.

Although it took a few attempts, we were able to make contact with our scheduled guest, known to our audience only as “W,” an intelligence insider. We know him well, and have met him face-to-face. I have spent many hours in meetings with him, and know his background. He is a “known and trusted source” with credentials and experience that few can match.

For this specific broadcast, our guest decided to connect from a particular public location using a mobile service. There was a valid reason for this, and it was decided and established in the days before the scheduled broadcast. The location was only known to two people—him and me. My son and co-host did not even know. It is important to note that this was only his second appearance that was scheduled in advance; his first scheduled appearance on 2 May 2014 was plagued with sound issues and disruptions. This time, however, it seems like someone wanted to send a different message. Or, perhaps it was mere coincidence. After all, “sometimes stuff just happens.”

It should be noted that “W” has appeared on our program before, although his appearances were spontaneous and unpublicized. Except for his joint appearance with former CIA operative Robert Tosh Plumlee, those appearances have largely proceeded without interference.

Following a series of text communications from our guest, the “red phone” lit up. On the other end of the line was “W,” calling from the predetermined broadcast location.

“You’re not going to believe this,” he said. At that moment, two unmarked but very visible S.W.A.T. vehicles, staffed by uniformed members of a local militarized police agency, made their presence known to him in a very obvious manner – having arrived several minutes after he was settled in . No, there was no “drama” associated with their presence—except for their presence. They were not engaging him or otherwise threatening him. They were just… there. One vehicle was stationary while the other drove around the lot. Again, it could all be a mere coincidence, and it could be a coincidence that they scurried from the area when “W” began taking pictures of them.

I have one of the photographs, complete with the time-stamp. And now, so do others. I will not publish them to protect the privacy of those curious about his location, so you’ll just have to take my word for it.

The “why” of it all

In a “post-mortem” examination of our computer log files and communication equipment, I wanted to learn what happened and why. After a few hours of investigation, I found that the plug was pulled on us exactly 11 minutes and six seconds before our scheduled airtime. Stated differently, that would be 666 seconds before the broadcast. Like the presence of the S.W.A.T. vehicles, though, I’m sure this could be merely a coincidence. I suppose it would be presumptuous of us to believe otherwise.

No equipment was damaged, and no other traces of nefarious doings were left, just dead air. Oh, and the embarrassment that is associated with this event, as I am certain that we will be described as unprofessional, ill-equipped riff-raff just pretending to be professionals. Furthermore, would any “normal” thinking person actually believe that anyone cares what we broadcast? Anyway, censorship and intimidation only happens under tyranny.

Coincidence aside for the moment, looking deeper into the events of our July 4th broadcast, or its prevention, begs the question “why?” Why this particular broadcast?

It’s no secret that our communications are being monitored by an out-of-control surveillance apparatus. It is reasonable, then, to suspect that those who monitor such communications had an idea of the topics to be covered. Could it be that even the opening sentence that “W” planned to speak was so damaging that they, the controllers of the airwaves, could not take the chance of allowing it to be heard? And as the program was promoted, “W” only intended to be speaking to a handful of listeners who would fully understand his message exactly as intended. So, who among our listeners also pose a threat to such powers? Think about it.

The alternative media, as we are called, is under attack. Other talk show hosts have recently experienced inexplicable and unprecedented interference, including the incredibly popular John B. Wells, host of Caravan to Midnight. That interference just so happened to occur during revelations by two guests whose information was quite unflattering to the people in power.

Could it all just be a mere coincidence? Or, could we be witnessing the systematic silencing of dissenting voices and purveyors of truth, of reality, amid a sea of media lies and disinformation?

I believe I know why we were unable to broadcast on July 4, 2014. I cannot disclose the reason, for doing so could jeopardize events and people unrelated to our show. But much like the plans, plots and schemes of those in power, it was a tit-for-tat response—an upping of the ante—for something that was done recently. If that’s indeed the case, and only if that’s the case, then the dogs of war have been released from their cages, and we are quite far down the path toward full censorship. If that’s the case, then, may God help us all.


THERE is little doubt that “Intelligence Insider” – and those closest aligned – understands the risks and has contingency plans. And while there is never a fail safe plan, there are still ways to ensure that unleashed FED forces – their paymasters too – pay the price, regardless of anything else. How so?

WELL, even though Obama’s goons have buried many skeletons, it is also the case that whistle blowers – some of whom are out in the open, others operate in the shadows, it just depends – tend to accumulate secret stashes, unknown to but a few within their trusted inner circles. It is this redundancy of materials, evidence, if you will, which lends particular comfort.

IN effect, hit squads – and this is what they are, just recall Bill and Hill’s…now you see them…now you don’t – often, unfortunately, reach their mark, but well hidden evidence has a way of turning up.

AGAIN, surely precautions are in place…