AMERICA’S DICTATOR-IN-CHIEF COMES “OUT OF THE CLOSET”: SOROS “INVADES” WH VIA (CLINTON’S) “TOP GUN” JOHN PODESTA! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WHILE many still insist that Congress has essential powers, as delineated within the Constitution, you would do well to go back to sleep. Congress is largely irrelevant. Barely a rubber stamp.

And those of us who studied Constitutional Law – not the “living breathing” (socialist) interpretation – understood the signs for what they were:

ARTICLE I

Its placement, as the First Article, was not for nothing. Spinning in their graves.

Though Congress’s erosion, its insidious undermining, has taken place for years with winks and nods (active assistance too) from many Congressional players on both sides of the aisle, its devastation has been ratcheted up (to an exponential degree) under the Dictator-in-Chief. To wit, the castration of Congress via a total power grab from the Executive branch has come to fruition. Full circle. Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s State of the Union address (January 28, 2014) spelled it ALL out. NO room for equivocation. Cocky…doesn’t even barely describe “The One’s” brash and brass tacks. Nunchucks.

As is said, no man is an island. Many “helping hands” are required –  along the path – to effectuate fateful and fatal outcomes. Some are more central than others, in fact, so much so that they should be coined “string pullers”. But let us not disregard back up players, they are more than necessary. Call them second string.

But what does the above have to do with the Dictator-in-Chief? Everything. Yet, since little happens in a vacuum, therefore, it pays to do a bit of back tracking. How did we get from there to here under the (thuggish) reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama? 

Back Track Number One: 

January 19, 2014 it was “predicted”:AMERICA (TO BE) RULED BY FIAT: AS DECREED BY ITS DICTATOR-IN-CHIEF! 2014, THE YEAR OF ITS INAUGURAL

Back Track Number Two:

Though Number One was the most recent warning, back in the day, October 2012, this too was foreseen:What Are The Chances Of Reining In A Lawbreaker-in-Chief, Who Abets Illegal Aliens Then Punishes Those Who Expose Said Lawbreaking? 

Back Track Number Three:

Yes, in Aug. 2012, this too was highlighted: The Fruits Of Washington’s Dictator-in-Chief…Via Short Video Clip!

Back Track Number Four:

But wouldn’t you know, a fellow Communist in Congress – and there exists quite a big crew – had verbal diarrhea and spilled the beans, one which spelled out how the Dictator-in-Chief will transform “Amerika”:Demster Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee’s Loose Lips, Her “Slip Of The Tongue”. Martial Law.

Back Track Number Five:

How many Americans, patriots no less, realize that OPEN communists are deep within Congress? U.S. CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNISTS & The Ties That Bind:The RED Portion Of The RED/GREEN Alliance. Mind blowing. A “captured” operation.

MOST ominously, stationed in the People’s House is Clinton’s “fixer”. Podesta’s presence raises the stakes for liberty’s (eventual) demise. Yes, a comrade of BOTH Clinton’s. He is running Obama’s show, but on behalf of the devil incarnate – Georgie boy Soros! Listen to the “puppet master” speak:http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xcmci9_george-soros-calls-for-a-new-world_news

But have no worries, Val (Obama’s “brain”), is still a very powerful player, though reportedly playing “second fiddle” to the latest hatchet man; communist loving, Podesta –  Soros Moves To Salvage White House Investment – Brings On ‘Project Podesta”

Podesta”, a formula that seeks to greatly enhance the power of the president via executive orders.

Obama promises a dramatic ‘year of action’ — with or without help of Congress

Insists U.S. must ‘reverse the tides’ of inequality

  •   U.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill in Washington January 28, 2014.  POOL PHOTO/Larry DowningU.S. President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill in Washington January 28, 2014. POOL PHOTO/Larry Downing

By Dave Boyer -The Washington Times

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

  • Provoking Republican lawmakers with an in-your-face vow to bypassCongress if necessary, President Obama said Tuesday night that he would use his executive authority on a dozen issues including income inequality and job training to spur “a year of action” for his stalled agenda.

“America does not stand still — and neither will I,” Mr. Obama said in the annual State of the Union address. “So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.”


SEE ALSO: Truth Watch: Obama a bit too rosy with his State of the Union math


In the Republican response, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state said the GOP has a more hopeful vision for the nation that empowers people rather than the government.

The president embarked on his go-it-alone strategy even before he started his speech, with the White House announcing a dozen executive actions that the president already has taken or will take in the coming weeks, including a move to create a class of “starter” retirement savings accounts available through employers.

Another of his actions will raise the minimum wage for federal contractors from $7.25 per hour to $10.10. The Labor Department said about 16,000 federal employees in 2012 received the federal minimum wage.

That move was intended to pressure lawmakers to pass a broader increase in the minimum wage for some 21 million workers.

“Give America a raise,” Mr. Obama challenged lawmakers.

The president’s push for executive actions immediately raised the ire of Republicans. Speaker John A. Boehner, who opposes a minimum wage increase on the grounds that it would slow economic growth, criticized the executive action.


SEE ALSO: Text of President Obama’s State of the Union address


“We’re just not going to sit here and let the president trample all over us,” said Mr. Boehner, Ohio Republican. “I have to remind him we do have a Constitution. And the Congress writes the laws, and the president’s job is to execute the laws faithfully. And if he tries to ignore this he’s going to run into a brick wall.”

Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, accused Mr. Obama of “acting like a child.”

The president delivered his address coming off his worst year in office, in which his agenda was sidetracked by scandals and the error-filled launch of Obamacare. With lawmakers preparing for pivotal midterm elections that could further complicate the president’s agenda, Mr. Obama called for progress on unfinished business such as immigration reform.

“In the coming months, let’s see where else we can make progress together,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s what most Americans want — for all of us in this chamber to focus on their lives, their hopes, their aspirations.”

Mr. Obama defended his beleaguered Obamacare health care law but didn’t mention the program’s troubled start in October or the continuing concerns about it. He warned the GOP not to attempt any more futile measures to repeal the law.

“The first 40 [bills] were plenty,” he said.

The president said he wants to use all the tools at his disposal to narrow the growing gap between rich and poor in America.

“After four years of economic growth, corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better,” Mr. Obama said. “But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled. Our job is to reverse these tides.”

Citing the lowest unemployment rate since he took office and a rebounding housing market, Mr. Obama said this year “can be a breakthrough year for America.”

Sour public mood

Mr. Obama’s rosy forecast for the economy is in contrast with the mood of the public about the state of the recovery. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Tuesday found that 68 percent of Americans believe they are not better off than when Mr. Obama became president.

In the survey, 39 percent said the country is in worse shape since Mr. Obama took office, and 63 percent said the country is on the wrong track.

The president’s move to raise the minimum wage for federal contractors, from $7.25 to $10.10 per hour, was more of a political statement than an effort to jump-start the economy. Because the order applies only to future contracts, it would affect only a small portion of the estimated 2 million workers who fall under the definition of federal contractors, as opposed to the 21 million workers nationwide who would benefit from a full increase in the hourly wage.

House Speaker John A. Boehner, who opposes a minimum wage increase on the grounds that it would slow economic growth, criticized the executive action Tuesday.

“We’re just not going to sit here and let the president trample all over us,” said Mr. Boehner, Ohio Republican. “I have to remind him we do have a Constitution. And the Congress writes the laws, and the president’s job is to execute the laws faithfully. And if he tries to ignore this, he’s going to run into a brick wall.”

Use of executive initiatives is the latest White House effort to move ahead on Mr. Obama’s agenda without congressional action. The president has used his executive power for action on climate change and on immigration, preventing the deportations under certain conditions of young people who were brought to the U.S. illegally.

Flexing executive power is nothing new, and Mr. Obama hasn’t used his presidential pen as often as his predecessors. Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush signed 213 and 173 orders, respectively, in their first terms, compared with 147 for Mr. Obama. Democrat Bill Clinton issued 200 executive orders in his first term.

New White House counsel John Podesta, an advocate of executive authority, said Mr. Obama has “warmed up” to the idea.

“And I think you’ll see that across a wide range of topics, including retirement security, moving forward on his climate change and energy transformation agenda,” Mr. Podesta told NPR.

Frustrated by Republicans’ resistance to his agenda, Mr. Obama also has taken unilateral steps to try to improve the nation’s employment situation, including securing a pledge by a group of major corporations not to discriminate against the long-term unemployed in hiring decisions.

Mr. Obama convened CEOs from across the country this month in an effort to persuade them to take “a second look” at hiring the long-term unemployed, who have emerged as a particular sore spot in the sluggish job market.

Several companies signed a pledge with the White House, including Bank of America, Xerox, AT&T and Lockheed Martin, stating that they are “committed to inclusive hiring practices.”

“After four years of economic growth, corporate profits and stock prices have rarely been higher, and those at the top have never done better,” Mr. Obama said. “But average wages have barely budged. Inequality has deepened. Upward mobility has stalled. Our job is to reverse these tides.”

Citing the lowest unemployment rate since he took office and a rebounding housing market, Mr. Obama said this year “can be a breakthrough year for America.”

At the end of it all, sach ha’kol, American patriots can either act now to save the Republic,or let the Dictator-in-Chief bring down America, as the greatest experiment in human liberty fails. Falls. 

Independent Counsel Needed: Investigate ‘High Crimes & Misdemeanors’ In The White House…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Whereas this op-ed writer, blogger and investigative journalist holds no claim to being a Constitutional expert (whose expertise lies elsewhere, primarily in geo-politics and the Mid East/Islam), a close associate surely qualifies. Unarguably, he is considered world class.  

Most assuredly, trampling on the Constitution is no small matter, even if one attempts to hide behind the ‘living breathing’ nonsensical mantra, as Obama (a so called Constitutional lawyer…oh please…talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel) and surrogates regularly intone its ‘merits’. And there are so many examples of the administration’s malfeasance it is hard to know where to commence the indictment. Yet, even a few will suffice, starting with their obsessive quest to eviscerate the First Amendment, a hallmark of any free society. Specifically, what more proof is needed than to internalize that the highest law enforcement official in the land, AG Eric Holder, is initiating ‘legal’ actions against Americans who criticize Islam? Are you thinking this blogger has lost it? Think again. Contained within the above link are more than enough exhibits to place Holder, and his boss, in the dock for high crimes and misdemeanors! 

NOT content with violating freedom of religion and speech, the regime in Washington is gunning for the Second Amendment ! How audacious. The right to keep and bear arms, without a scintilla of a doubt, is a bedrock of America’s Constitutional Republic, but not according to Obama’s thugs. Yes, they will grab America’s guns – whatever it takes. And, the UN is their go to address, as they seek to strip Americans of their right to bear arms, yet patriots have other ideas, even as leftists go postal over gun control. It will be out of their cold, dead hands.

EVEN some in Congress are beginning to see that they have Constitutional options to indict this runaway regimeand it is not as if true scholars and patriots aren’t giving them Constitutional legal cover.

Along comes Professor Paul Eidelberg – a more than qualified Constitutional scholar and patriot – to America’s rescue, as he gives ‘We the People’ all the Constitutional muster needed to indict the criminals ruling Washington. Get busy. Start your petitions!

‘Needed: An Independent Counsel to Investigate the Obama Administration’

Paul Eidelberg (Ph.D., University of Chicago)

The failure of Barack Hussein Obama, the President of the United States, to protect American citizens abroad indicates that he may have violated Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight, of the U.S. Constitution which sets forth the presidential oath of office in these words:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Accordingly:

Whereas the present writer, a native-born American citizen who served as a Lieutenant in the United States Air Force, and who conducted seminars during the Korean War to inform American soldiers about the totalitarian nature of America’s arch enemy, the Soviet Union;

And whereas this author has written books on the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as well as a book entitled “Beyond Détente: Toward an American Foreign Policy,” a book based on Washington’s “Farewell Address”;

And whereas the principles elaborated in the latter book obliged the present writer to urge President Ronald Reagan to transcend the futile policy of détente with the Soviet Union—indeed, to promote the disintegration of that “Evil Empire”;

And whereas the same author sees that the Barack Administration is pursuing the discredited policy of détente vis-à-vis Islam, an imperialistic ideology which, like that of Communist Russia, does not recognize any international borders or the nation-state system;

And whereas this American, for the previous reasons, is more keenly aware of the perilous course of the United States, as well as more profoundly concerned about the well-being of Americans serving in American embassies and consulates abroad;

Indeed, whereas some of these Americans have perished because of the détente or ideologically neutral mentality of the Obama Administration and its possibly criminal negligence:

I therefore urge Americans to petition the Congress of the United States to reconstitute, in accordance with its Special Prosecutor Act of 1978, an Independent Counsel to investigate and prosecute designated high-ranking Executive Branch officials, including President Barack Obama, who are suspected of possible malfeasance in high office.

For those who are unfamiliar with Professor Paul Eidelberg’s background and groundbreaking scholarship, see within for his latest scholarly contribution.

IF the master Prof gives the heads up, citing the Constitutional underpinnings for said Independent Counsel, then take it to the bank. To heart. And this blog stands shoulder to shoulder with the recommendations herein. No additional ‘proofs’ required (nor footdragging or pussyfooting), other than a basic understanding of High Crimes & Misdemeanors