SHARIAH LAW: Its Barbaric & Filthy Back-Story. America’s Death Kneel, The West In Toto, If Not Beaten Back. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

DEPENDING upon ones circle of contacts, be they professional or personal, varying degrees of knowledge, or lack thereof, re Shariah Law becomes apparent.

IN the main, most non-Muslim westerners understand that it is “likely”…”somewhat”….incompatible with the west. Even fewer have a clue as to its Koranic basis and its lack of boundaries – literally. True, Islam’s “vague” mistreatment of women is in the forefront of any discussion, however, that too is often misunderstood, even romanticized, if you dare imagine. Lawrence of Arabia fever-like.

PAR for the course, countless westerners are lulled into believing that whatever “norms” are Shariah bound – and culturally endemic within the horrific world of Islam – are confined to its followers and borders, therefore, it is none of their business. Newsflash One: said delusional thinking is way off target. Deadly.

IN this regard, every single barbaric hudud punishment is applicable across the board, that is, wherever Shariah Law gains a foothold and stranglehold. You got that? In other words, its core underpinnings are endemic within the American-Muslim community and inside every other western sphere. Guaranteed, its blow back is only a matter of time, the Constitution be damned.

Image result for pics of sharia law will rule

MOST alarmingly, it is hardly as if Allah’s Muslim Terrorists are not upfront about their global designs, and with America as their top target.

AS reported on Oct. 23, 2014, the newly minted “most influential” American-Muslim came into this investigative journalist’s radar, a full 4 months before he was anointed TOP Islamic dog! For the record, his supporters were none too pleased with the spotlight at this site. Oh well.

This year’s issue of The Muslim 500 names Sheikh Hamza Yusuf as the most influential Muslim-American. He is often portrayed as a moderate, but he recently endorsed Sharia governance and heads an Islamist college in California with extremist faculty.

Yusuf is ranked as the 35th most influential Muslim in the world by the publication. He is described as the “leading Islamic authority” in America. He is the current president and a senior faculty member of Zaytuna College in California.continue reading….

IN tandem, if they can pull it off in tough as nails Texas, well, any state is up for grabs.

Islamic-Tribunal-Texas

WHICH brings this discussion full circle to the aforementioned “back-story”, one that hits an absolute bulls-eye. In a nutshell, it targets a two-tier danger that awaits westerners, when in close proximity to Shariah. Moreover, those who, for whatever reason, find themselves in Islam’s cross hairs – expecting their own leaders to push back against Islam’s boot – will be sorely misled. Indeed, they are placing themselves in very grave straits. Stranded. Newsflash Two: their submissive western leaders will NOT stand up for them. Period.

MIND you, even though the following barbarism took place in 2008, its intrinsic value, lesson learned, stands as Exhibit Number One:

An Australian woman is suing a five-star UAE hotel after she was drugged and raped by co-workers – but ended up in jail for eight months for having sex outside marriage.

Alicia Gali, 29, had her drink spiked and was raped by four co-workers at the luxury Le Meridien Al Aqah Beach Resort in the United Arab Emirates in June 2008.

She is seeking compensation from her former employer for breaching its workplace duty of care after she reported the assault to authorities, only to be jailed for eight months on an adultery charge.

Ms Gali spent eight months in prison as it is illegal as having sex outside marriage in the UAE is illegal.

Australian embassy staff advised Ms Gali and her family not to go to the media during her time in custody, when she was locked in a cell with 30 other women.

She has since been pardoned and was released in March 2009. 

AND if westerners are wondering if the legal system in Australia is emblematic of the cowing and bowing to Islam, when Allah’s Muslim Terrorists strike within their own borders, well, the following cautionary lesson serves as Exhibit Number Two:

Bit by bit, Western nations are adopting Muslim legal standards on blasphemy and on the treatment of women.

The excuses are manifold. Racism, cultural differences, Islamophobia, relativism… but it all ends the same way, with Western writers, artists and thinkers being censored and Western women being subject to Taliban treatment.

This is how it began.

An Afghan refugee would drive from his home in Tullamarine to nightclubs in Frankston late at night searching for drunk, vulnerable young woman to prey on, a court was told today.

He would pick them up in his white 1988 Honda Civic and rape them.

The victim was sitting on the footpath behind the 21st Century Dance Club when Esmatullah Sharifi approached her and offered to give her a lift to the Bay Hotel.

She accepted but became anxious and confused when they had been driving for an hour and she saw a road sign saying Sorrento.

Sharifi then pulled over into a dark side street and raped her in the front passenger seat.

“She began to scream and cry out for help,” Ms Dalziel said.

“The accused put his left hand over her mouth and his right hand around her neck, restricting her breathing. He said to her, ‘I’ll take you home after it, I’ll give you back your phone as well’.

In the rapist’s defense, his lawyer argued that he wasn’t at all clear about this whole “Women are human beings” thing.

Mr Regan said Esmatullah Sharifi was uneducated, illiterate, inexperienced in forming relationships with women, and was confused about the nature of consent. He is in Australia on a permanent protected visa.

The judge didn’t buy it then, but the usual lefty approach is to just keep appealing until you find a bleeding heart judge who accepts the horrible notion being put forward. And that didn’t take very long.

Granting leave to appeal, Court of Appeal Justice Robert Redlich said: “The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Esmatullah Sharifi) didn’t have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations.”

In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had “an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships” in Australia.

“It proves, in my view, an adequate basis for most grounds of appeal that (Sharifi) wishes to pursue,” the judge said.

We’re not just dealing with ignorance of the law. We have Western judges setting out the notion that if a Muslim settler in Europe, America or Australia does not understand the concept that women can refuse sexual contact, that this is a mitigating circumstance.

Ms Dalziel said Esmatullah Sharifi claimed he did not have a great understanding of sexual mores in Australia but Judge Mark Dean disagreed.

“These are acts of violence,” the judge said. “Serious acts of violence against women, nothing to do with sexual mores. They’re brutal acts of violence.”

But they do. In Muslim sexual mores, serious acts of violence being committed against women are not a problem because the women do not belong to themselves. They belong to their family.

Islam does not recognize the same concept of individual rights as civilized jurisprudence does. Furthermore Muslims from tribal societies like Afghanistan bring those same tribal attitudes along.

As Australian columnist Andrew Bolt says, quite rightly,

If Afghan men have a culture which leaves them more likely to rape, and our courts have a culture of being more lenient as a consequence, I suggest Australian women have an interest in stopping the boats until we get this sorted out:

And that doesn’t just go only for Australia. Stop the boats. Stop the planes. Stop the trains.

The left cannot have it both ways.

Either Esmatullah Sharifi is responsible for his own actions. Or he isn’t. Either rape is cultural or it’s individual. Either Esmatullah Sharifi should be hit with the full force of the law or the Afghan culture of rape represents a threat to non-Muslim countries.

They can only pick one.

STILL yet, is Exhibit Number Three necessary? Perhaps. 

AS expected, they are completely cowed and bowed.

INCONTROVERTIBLY, as to the west’s falling in line with another of Shariah Law’s dictates, blasphemy, well, America has already nailed that one down – and not in a good way!

BUT most significantly for Americans (westerners alike), they must consider the facts at hand on multiple levels, that is, if they value their own safety.

POINTEDLY, if one travels (male or female), let alone resides in an Islamic country, one can easily get caught up in a Shariah underpinned nightmare. Not only that, a westerner’s citizenship means less than squat, when it comes to escaping their brand of “justice.” Internalize this truth too: not one country, let alone America, will protest or protect from Islam’s boot. 

RESULTANT, westerners must come to grips that they are on their own, when it comes to beating back Shariah Law. This is the case whether they are outside their own borders or even inside them. The good news is that it can be stopped, blow by blow.

AND for the record, up until 9/11/01 – or thereabouts – one could have been forgiven for being ignorant of the most brutal aspects of Islam via Shariah Law. No longer. After all, alternative media – with this site in the forefront – has been beating the drum at a steady pace. And if one is computer literate, it is next to impossible to veer away. In fact, their barbarism has been catapulting across the globe – in one way or another – and is sanctioned by Shariah Law. How much more obvious does it have to be?

AGAIN, how many realize that Shariah Law has been creeping, stealth-fully, into America? If not, it is way past time to catch up to speed!

BTW, in case readers are wondering: is there such a thing as “Shariah-lite”, when practiced outside Dar al-Islam or within its confines? The answer is: never and never! 

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

 

 

Islamic Kiddies Perfect The “Art” Of Beheading:America In The Cross Hairs.What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

ISIS have got a kid to execute the 'Israeli spy'

egyptian-children-mock-isis-beheading

(On the upswing….kiddie beheaders…coming to a western locale near you!!)

FEW are unaware that America (under the anti-American-in-Chief) has purposefully abdicated its mantle of leadership throughout the world. This includes both domestic and foreign areas of concern. However, the arena which is most visible, dangerously so, revolves around Obama Inc.’s (western leaders alike) heinous refusal to link Islamic mandates to barbaric acts of terror. 

President Obama would have us believe Islam is truly the Religion of Peace. He condemned ISIS as completely un-Islamic when he spoke about their beheading of American journalist James Foley, before returning to the golf course to complete his round.

“So ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents. No just God would stand for what they did yesterday, and for what they do every single day. ISIL has no ideology of any value to human beings. Their ideology is bankrupt. They may claim out of expediency that they are at war with the United States or the West, but the fact is they terrorize their neighbors and offer them nothing but an endless slavery to their empty vision, and the collapse of any definition of civilized behavior.”

Yet Obama, who openly declares his love for the Qur’an after studying Islam since his childhood, certainly should know Islam’s Holy Book actually encourages the behavior of ISIS.

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

 

GRANTED, as repulsive as it is, the fact remains that Islamic doctrine advocates beheading (and similar Hudud doctrine) as “appropriate” punishment under Shariah Law. So the question becomes: do Americans (and the rest of the west) agree to live under said dictates or not? Mind you, this is hardly a theoretical question, not at all. In fact, it is completely practical in nature. How so?

CONSIDER:

AS to the kiddie element, well, all evidence is leading to the fact that their grooming is on the upswing and its lethal effects are spreading. Why would Americans (westerners) think they are immune, knowing full well that what starts in the streets of the Mid East/Africa ends up (sooner or later) in theirs? Indeed. 

HARDLY an anomaly…a spreading cancer!

IN reality, what seems like an endemic problem in far away lands is nothing of the kind. This mindset is wishful thinking.

PRAY tell, is Oklahoma in the U.S. – or not? Is N.J. in the U.S. – or not? There are other states too.

NOW, what about Muslim-Americans who threaten to behead, yet haven’t gotten the chance to carry out their act(s) of Islamic retribution?

Allahu Akbar or Allah is Greater originated as a threat during Mohammed’s genocide of Jews in what is today Saudi Arabia. It still continues to be shouted at scenes of Muslim violence.

Its underlying meaning is “Allah is greater than your God”. And the proof of that is usually violent.

As the number of Muslims in the US grows, the kind of Muslim Supremacist anti-Semitic harassment that had become commonplace in Europe is headed here.

A 24-year-old resident of Miami Beach has been arrested by Miami Beach Police after he repeatedly yelled “Allahu Akbar” and “your heads will be cut off” at a two Jewish men Saturday night, Miami Beach Police said Tuesday.

According to the Police, the two men – David Weberman, 58, and Issac Rosenberg 32, – were sitting outside the Ohev Shalom Synagogue located at 7055 bonita drive at around 9:25 pm on Saturday night when Diego Chaar, 24, walked by with a friend and yelled at them, “Allahu Akbar.” The two first ignored him. But them Chaar yelled twice, ‘heads will be cut off’, which prompted the two men to leave the scene in fear of their safety.

Miami Beach Police responded to the scene, and after canvasing the area with Weberman and Rosenberg they located the two men hiding behind cars. The two Jewish men identified the suspect, but he denied having said anything to them. The officers then let them walk free.

About an hour later, at around 10:10 pm, the same two men again walked by the synagogue and once again yelled “Allahu Akbar” and “your heads will be cut off”. At this point high-ranking detectives responded to the call and arrested the suspects.

 

BESIDES, rationally speaking, isn’t the common denominator to the “art” of beheading rooted in Islam? Of course.

IN effect, the next query becomes: since Islamic slaughter continues apace all over the world, what exactly will it take for U.S. leadership, Congress especially, to act on behalf of the American people? In other words, how many heads will have to fly within the streets of America, before HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) is forced to deal with Islam’s poisonous effects, albeit, not under his own free will?

The Islamic State released a video Tuesday purporting to show a young boy executing an Israeli Arab who it claimed infiltrated the group in Syria to spy for the Jewish state. In the video, a youth identifying himself as Mohammed Said Ismail Musallam recounts how he was recruited by Israeli intelligence.

passport-islamic-state-e1426016595354

Dressed in the familiar orange jumpsuit, 19-year-old Musallam is shown kneeling in front of the boy, who appears to be no more than 12 years old, and a man standing at his side. The man, speaking in French, issues threats against Jews in France, before the boy walks around in front of the hostage and then shoots him in the forehead using a pistol.

The boy, who shouts “Allahu Akbar” then shoots the man four more times as he lies on the ground.

'More like Islam and Mohammed.'

ISIS Child executioner

In February, Musallam’s father denied in comments to AFP the ISIS claim that his son was an Israeli agent. “My son is innocent; ISIS accused him of working for Mossad because he tried to run away,” Said Musallam said, claiming that his son had travelled to Syria to join the jihadists.

Following release of the video Tuesday, Musallam said he did “not know anything”. “He is absolutely not religious,” Musallam said earlier, adding that perhaps his son had been recruited through the Internet. Musallam said his son, an Israeli citizen, abandoned his national service in the fire department to join ISIS.

Grieving parents

In the video below, Mohammed Said Ismail Musallam, explains how he was, in fact, recruited and trained by the Israelis to be a spy, after which he was sent to Syria to gather information about ISIS and on any Palestinians there. He says his family  not only approved of his career choice, but encouraged him because of the high rate of pay he would receive.

http://sendvid.com/embed/ugehc0v3

YES, inch by inch, step by step, stealth by stealth, Shariah Law is being implemented/implanted in the U.S. In fact, who would have thought (even 5 years ago) that demands made by Muslims would override everyone else’s, even to the extent of overhauling the training of all law enforcement? Do they live in an Islamic country or in America? 

As America veers towards Islamic Sharia law in order to cater to the demanding minority of Muslims, citizens are seeing not only an attempt to include and appease Muslims, but an infringement upon the rights of the majority.

With such a vocal group as that of Islam in the U.S., major corporations are making a shift toward including the brutal slaughter that is halal, and the newest addition to the list of Muhammad-approved businesses is the largest superstore yet.

The Miami Student reports that Wal-Mart has taken the leap into dangerous waters, approving the provision of halal meats.

With a petition, Oxford assistant professor Tareq Hasan Khan and the Muslim Student Association (MSA) of Miami University has pressured Wal-Mart into providing meats that have been slaughtered in a manner acceptable by halal standards, as per the Quran.

(Let it be noted that the petition garnered only 50 signatures while passed around the internet.)

According to the Quranic definition, halal livestock should be slaughtered by slitting the throat of the beast, bleeding the animal out by the throat, all while invoking the name of Allah in prayer. It’s often argued that halal slaughter is the most humane form of butchery, claiming that the animal endures as little pain and suffering as possible, but the documented videos reveal the ugly truth.

EFFECTIVELY, Shariah Law courts are already in place (illustrated here too) in America, and others are in the offing. In fact, Muslim-American leaders admit that the implementation of Shariah Law is their absolute goal to subvert the Constitution. Believe them.

AGREED, some may innocently inquire: isn’t it a big leap to suggest that “accommodating” growing demands made by Muslims in certain arenas is a quantum leap from decapitation becoming a reality of life in America? Not at all.

ABOVE all else, as mentioned repeatedly, without Shariah Law there is no Islam. It is all encompassing and one cannot pick and choose which laws are binding and which are not. This includes decapitation, and it is an ingrained part of Shariah Law. Period.  

AMERICANS need to ask themselves the following urgent query: what are their own “green/Islamist lines”? Again, are flying heads said demarcation, or will Americans assert themselves before then?

TIME will tell. Running out…

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}