AD infinitum, akin to a broken record, this site has reported on the Gestapo-like tactics of Obama Inc.’s DHS, a captured operation. Orwell’s universe. And it’s into this Alice-in-Wonderland vortex which patriots, akin to filmmaker James O’Keefe, find themselves.
It all started in August 2014, when O’Keefe donned green fatigues and an Osama bin Laden costume and sneaked across the U.S. border to Mexico and then back into Texas, a stunt cited by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in congressional hearings. O’Keefe said in an interview Wednesday, that his point was to “show that our elected officials were lying to the American people” by saying the border is secure.
[James O’Keefe crosses border dressed as Osama bin Laden]
But he may have messed with the wrong bureaucrats, because the powerful DHS — the third-largest Cabinet department — controls border security. Ever since the bin Laden stunt, O’Keefe said, he has been stopped and questioned at length by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers each of the five times he has tried to reenter the United States. The questions, he said, have been overly intrusive, covering his business operations, what his next investigative project will be and his political views.
“It is our contention that this is retaliation for our journalism along the Mexican border,” O’Keefe said. “It’s troubling that they are doing this to a citizen reporter. . . . These questions have nothing to do with national security or border issues or smuggling narcotics into the country. They are questions that they would never ask a Washington Post reporter, that they would never ask NBC News.”
To buttress his claims, O’Keefe did what he does best: He released a surreptitiously recorded video. The 9-minute-16-second production provides hints that DHS was not pleased by O’Keefe’s bin Laden venture but reveals no clear evidence that the agency is targeting him.
At one point, a Customs and Border Protection officer at the Montreal airport is heard asking O’Keefe on July 14: “Maybe you’ve passed the border before in a disguise? Or dressed as someone else? You’ve done that kind of stuff before?”
“So are they retaliating against me?” O’Keefe asks.
The officer firmly denies it. “No, we’re not retaliating against you. Why would you say that?” he says.
At another point, however, a different CBP officer tells O’Keefe that agency officials had put a “hit on you” to avoid getting “egg on their face, basically.”
The video does show officers asking O’Keefe a series of detailed questions about his business model, how his company makes money and his political opinions.
“What’s your next project?” one officer asks.
“I was so flabbergasted by the question, I couldn’t even form a coherent response,” O’Keefe says in the video.
An officer then asks O’Keefe whom he wants to win the Republican nomination for president and whether he would support businessman Donald Trump, who has fueled his political rise with outspoken comments about illegal immigrants.
“I don’t really endorse politicians for, you know, anything,” O’Keefe responds.
In a statement late Wednesday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection rejected O’Keefe’s allegations of retaliation but said it could not comment on the specifics of his case, citing privacy concerns.
“CBP does not retaliate against applicants for entry into the United States,’’ the statement said, adding that travelers can be sent to additional, secondary screening based on a variety of factors, including security concerns, immigration violations and prior criminal convictions. The statement did not contest the video’s depictions of O’Keefe’s encounters with federal officers.
O’Keefe, who styles himself as a “guerrilla journalist,” made his name in conservative circles with controversial stings that in one instance appeared to show officials of a federally funded nonprofit that provided housing and other assistance to low-income people discussing prostitution and tax evasion. The ensuing scandal prompted Congress to strip funding from the group, ACORN, and led to its demise.
[James O’Keefe, associate, describe controversial ACORN videos]
In that case and others, O’Keefe was accused of selectively editing his videos. And his new release is not really a video at all: It consists mostly of audio recordings of the federal officers, with the Customs and Border Protection logo on the upper left part of the screen.
In a statement late Wednesday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection rejected O’Keefe’s allegations of retaliation but said it could not comment on the specifics of his case, citing privacy concerns.
AND to prop up said (incendiary) charge, demonstrating how what happened to O’Keefe was hardly a one-off, let’s just hop over to more of the same ala their favorite tactic: to silence all who dare to state the truth re Islam – as well as the dangers accrued due to the incursion of Illegal infiltrators via America’s (purposefully) open sesame borders – they issue outright threats and veiled ones!
YES, this site asserted in July 2014: “Obama’s Goons Silencing/Threatening Whistleblowers: Shut Up, Or Else.”
NOW, onto the main nail in DHS’s, aka Mafia Inc.’s, charge sheet:
A Department of Homeland Security agent blew the whistle on the feds . . . and they went after her with a vengeance! Now, she’s speaking out before Congress. Where will this end for her?
According to the Conservative Tribune, Taylor Johnson, a senior special agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, told the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs that she faced massive retribution after revealing irregularities in the EB-5 visa program. The EB-5 visa grants green cards to foreigners who invest $500,000 in American companies. Johnson, an 11-year veteran of the ICE, told the committee that she found corruption and mismanagement that, in her words, posed “national security risks.” Johnson revealed the following:
“Some of the violations investigated surrounding the project included bank and wire fraud, and I discovered ties to organized crime and high-ranking politicians and they received promotions that appeared to facilitate the program,” she also discovered that:
“applicants from China, Russia, Pakistan, Malaysia had been approved in as little as 16 days. ‘In addition, case files lacked the basic and necessary law enforcement queries.’” Johnson added:
“I found over 800 operational EB-5 regional centers throughout the U.S.,” commenting that this was, “odd because the United States only allows 10,000 EB-5 visas per year.”
Obama’s cohorts don’t take well to being called to task. After blowing the whistle on the EB-5 program, agency retaliation was swift and severe. Johnson was escorted from her desk and denied access to her own case files. The government then informed adoption social workers that Johnson had lost her job due to criminal activity.
“When an adoption social worker tried to contact and verify employment, she was told that I had been terminated for a criminal offense,” Johnson said, holding back tears. “I almost lost my 1-year-old child.” Johnson was also denied her constitutional right to carry a firearm.
“I was told I couldn’t even carry or own a personal weapon which is a constitutional rights violation,” she testified.
Eliminating your job, your reputation, and your constitutional rights seems to be policy for the Obama administration . . . but trying to take your children?
VIDEO: DHS Agent Exposed Obama! Feds Take Her Job, Her Reputation . . . And Go After Her DAUGHTER!
THE urgent query becomes: how could it be that in the United States of America its umbrella security agency treats illegal infiltrators, domestic terrorists and general anti-American provocateurs with kid gloves, yet, patriots and vets are branded “domestic terrorists?”
IN fact, America’s security arms shield illegal infiltrators via a revolving door of “justice” ala sanctuary cities and the like. Resultant, the blood of innocent Americans lands at Obama Inc.’s door! Not only that, Muslim Brotherhood Mafia front groups are feted as “go to” addresses re all things Islamic, and Black Panther domestic terrorists are just “misunderstood.” How did it come to this?
ALAS, if ever there was a time to rally around patriotic U.S. soldiers, calling upon them to be insubordinate, this is it. Such is the case when an Islamist-in-Chief is the Commander-in-Chief, one whose end goal – at home and abroad – is to eviscerate all vestiges of America as a nation predicated upon Judeo-Christian principles. One who demands that America’s warriors prostrate before Islam – or else!
Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. The ritual lasts for 30 days. For the 8,200 U.S. personnel living here, and those serving throughout the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility — including service members, civilian personnel, contractors and family members — the month may require changing some daily routines including reading the Bible publicly.
Navy officials are requiring U.S. personnel to dress like Muslims off-base during Ramadan. Although not a requirement by Bahraini authorities, the Navy is demanding that men wear long-sleeved shirts and women wear sleeved blouses that cover their elbows. Also, men must wear long trousers, and women should wear pants or skirts that cover the knees.
SO if any message needs to be sent by those (non-Muslims) who voluntarily protect America via its armed forces it’s this: “with all ‘due respect’, Mr. President, we are not fighting to protect Islam, rather, to shield America from its barbaric onslaught! And if this is not in sync with your ideological, political and quasi-religious outlook, so be it. Furthermore, we took an oath to the Constitution, not to the person who happens to be despoiling the People’s House – emphasis placed. To wit, let’s call an ace an ace and a spade a spade: you, Mr. President, are an Islamic son of a bitch!!”
OVER AND OUT….
OH, patriots have your backs!


