Adina Kutnicki

A Zionist & Conservative Blog

Adina Kutnicki

Tag Archives: DOMA

Western “Elites” Aim To WIPE Out Christianity & Judaism:”Long Knives” Via (Temporary) Islamic Rule!Germany’s President & Obama/Clinton Inc. In Forefront. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
1

Resistance1-vi

RATIONALLY speaking, and from the tippy top of officialdom in the west, Marxist/socialist infused so-called elites are employing a scorched earth policy against Christianity and Judaism, America’s roots. It is verily impossible to deny what is taking place on the ground.

SO much so, their war starts with the kiddies. They are executing everything in their power to eviscerate all attachments to the traditional family. Mainly, but not exclusively, they are cutting off what it means to be male or female via sexual “re-assignments” ala the newly indoctrinated and bastardized lexicon, comparing it to slang words which evolve over time. Okey dokey.

Language changes with the times, and when it comes to our conceptions of gender, the times are most certainly changing.

We are opening up to the idea that binary conceptions of gender are unnecessarily rigid and don’t correspond to the self-image of a great many people, and even that people’s sense of their gender may not correspond to their biological sex. In this new world, a bland opposition between “he” and “she” seems increasingly antique, and even insulting, to many.
However, doing something about that is going to be a challenge. We are dealing not with merely giving new names to new things or actions, which is easy, but with using new pronouns, which is very hard.
This is why previous attempts to fashion gender-neutral pronouns haven’t caught on (believe it or not, there were once calls for the blend hesh!), and why as clever as today’s “ze” is, its evolution from in-house tradition to society-wide acceptance will be slow at least, and possibly ill-fated. Bias alone will play its part, surely, but even without it, new pronouns require a mental effort analogous to conceiving dimensions beyond the third.

 

HMM….and those who refuse to comply will be punished, until they fall into line, as per the totalitarian dictates.

The Princeton University HR department has largely wiped the word “man” from its vocabulary.

The relatively new policy in effect at the Ivy League institution spells out the directive in a four-page memo that aims to make the department more gender inclusive.

Instead of using “man,” employees are told to use words such as human beings, individuals or people…..

Marquette University’s Writing Center wrote a policy similar to UNC Chapel Hill’s, and it implies that those who do not abide by it may face consequences.

“When you are writing about people in general, many of your professors will expect you to use ‘inclusive’ or ‘nonsexist’ language, that is, gender neutral language,” Marquette’s website states, adding that many people find non-neutered language “not only inaccurate but offensive.”

FOR all intents and purposes, knocking down DOMA was their opening shot. In conjunction, erasing all gender identity goes against everything basic to America’s roots. 

In November 2013, the U.S. Senate voted in favor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). The law is based on the assumption that one’s perceived “gender identity” does not always “match” your sex “assigned” or “designated” at birth. So, the thinking goes, the law should allow a more ambiguous array of gender identities: male, female, both, neither, or something else entirely. It’s not an overstatement to say that ENDA is a huge step, mostly under the radar, to codify a new definition of humanity…..

The transgender movement has strong totalitarian overtones that Americans (especially certain senators) don’t fully understand. How else to describe a crusade with such far-reaching consequences for First Amendment rights? The legal destruction of gender distinctions will inevitably dissolve family autonomy, thereby uprooting freedom of association. Free expression becomes “hate speech” if one doesn’t fall into line with the directives of the transgender lobby or its pronoun protocol. Freedom of religion takes a direct hit any way you look at it.

Under the guise of “rights,” the transgender movement can serve as convenient cover for consolidating and centralizing power under an ever-expanding State. Once we allow the State to refuse to recognize that children result from the male-female union, we grant the State more power to separate us from our children. As power becomes more centralized in the State, the individuals and institutions of the State, inevitably flawed, end up owning our personal relationships. With weakened mediating institutions—family, churches, private associations—we lose the buffer zones that stand between individuals and an encroaching state.

INDEED, step-by-step, root-by-root.

BUT it is imperative to recognize that America’s destroyers operate hand-in-glove with Islam’s warriors, many of whom will include tens of thousands of illegal alien (mostly males, 68% aged 15-17) “kiddies”, and to the tune of 52,000 in 2016 alone! “Refugees” alike.

WHICH brings us back to Germany’s President and his hopeful “hint” for a Muslim to succeed him! 

As he prepares to step down, citing his advancing years, Joachim Gauck hinted that he wanted a Muslim to succeed him.  Further pushing his arrogance to the limit, he condemned the newly-growing sense of German national identity and the danger of a disintegration of the EU, saying: “The elites are not the problem at all, the population is at the moment the problem.”

UK Express  The 76-year-old’s remarks are likely to create difficulties for the already embattled chancellor, Mrs Merkel, who is already facing an increasingly fractious debate over the Islamization of Germany, sparked by her open door refugee policy.  Echoing his concerns, an MP for Mrs Merkel’s coalition government said people “will put up the wall by force” to this decision.

Christian Democratic (CDU) MP, Klaus-Peter Willsch added: “That is not good for our country.” Mr Gauck’s successor will not be decided by a direct vote, but by the political parties, along with a congress including sports people, celebrities and other public figures.

RISE OF THE 4TH REICH? German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel recently called for the “rounding up and imprisonment of German citizens who oppose mass Muslim immigration”

Vice-President of the EU Parliament, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, said it would not be acceptable for the next German president to be ”a mullah with a Turban” but it is plausible for a “representative of modern, enlightened Islam” (but there is no such thing) to be the next leader.

But Germany has witnessed a dramatic changing attitude of the nation’s population towards the religion over the past year, which has seen the arrival of more than one million MUSLIM migrants.  CDU MP Karl- Georg Wellmann described the plans as “totally absurd”

He said: “That would not be appropriate in the current situation. This would only deepen the divisions in society. ”

http://players.brightcove.net/2540076170001/4kfqgmETl_default/index.html?videoId=5084687698001

OMINOUSLY, what Germany’s (yesteryear) anti-freedom leaders couldn’t totally wipe out, uproot, via Nazi rule, that is, Judaism and Christianity, today’s leadership anticipate Allah’s Muslim (collaborative) soldiers will be able to accomplish.

ALONG said anti-western thrusts, it is an open “secret” that HUSSEIN despises Christianity (and Judaism), as does Hill. In fact – and with all due gratitude and respect to the hacking team at Wikileaks, high-fives all around – the following is prima facie proof of the charges at hand:

We all know that Hillary Clinton shamelessly exploits her Methodist upbringing for political use, but newly released emails from WikiLeaks reveal how Mrs. Clinton truly views her fellow Christians.

Not only does the Democrat support abortion and gay marriage, both of which are frowned upon in the Christian faith, we now know that those closest to Mrs. Clinton despised Catholics and their “backward” beliefs.

According to a series of emails between John Halpin, a senior fellow at the far-left Center for American Progress, and top Clinton aides Jennifer Palmieri and John Podesta, the three smear Catholics and their beliefs as being “backwards” and showing contempt for American Catholics and Conservative Catholics…..refer further to attached reproduced email link.

NOT only that, as “good” totalitarians are wont to do, it is mandatory to have a submissive and compliant citizenry to get the job done!

Yet another document from the treasure trove Wikileaks has been releasing of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s emails has caused an uproar by appearing to lament the fact the American populace has grown ‘non-compliant.’

In this particular exchange, Bill Ivey — Chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts under President Bill Clinton — wrote to Podesta in apprehension Hillary Clinton “is not an entertainer” and thus won’t be able to compete with bombastic reality star Donald Trump.

Ivey queries Podesta how they could “offset” this unexpected flaw in Clinton not being a “celebrity in the Trump, Kardashian mold.”

But what Ivey states next in this lamentation characteristic of 2016’s surreality has become the subject of hushed debate — because if his words are to be taken literally, they portend a possible methodological collusion to keep Americans docile and submissive — perhaps in the vein of panem et circenses….

STILL yet, and on a more practical basis, it is well documented that HUSSEIN’s DHS ensured that the borders remain open sesame to all manner of illegals, including those from Islamic jihad driven nations. In turn, their expectation is to tip the balance against the nation’s underpinnings. Again, why would they do that, and to what end?

CONCOMITANTLY, what is left hanging in the air remains: what is the nexus between the radical left, its Marxist/socialist imbued counterparts, with Islam’s soldiers for Allah? In other words, why would they cooperate on this tag-team effort? Yes, it’s a fair question.

IN a nutshell, the red/green alliance is, first and foremost, about the destruction of the west, irrespective of all else. Not only that, the ties that bind are their underpinned totalitarian ideologies, that which brook no dissent. 

Image result for a friend of a friend is my enemy

MORE specifically, the adage, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, is taken to heart by both. By extrapolation, when all is said and done, Obama and Clinton Inc.’s red henchmen, in tandem with Germany’s (assorted Euros alike) counterparts, are arrogant enough to believe that they can “control” Allah’s Muslim Terrorists.

EFFECTIVELY, not if, but when Islam’s soldiers for Allah take over the west, their co-conspirators are convinced that they will be able to remove the sword of Islam from their hands, thus, wielding the same “long knives” that the Nazis utilized against Christianity in general and Judaism in particular to regain the upper hand.

SUBSTANTIVELY, if history is any guide, look no further than to the collaborative efforts between Hitler and Jerusalem’s Mufti, Mohammed Amin al-Husseini.

TO wit, with co-joined SS shock troops, they anticipated wiping out Judaism and Christianity as the west’s underpinnings. Again, each side expected to come out on top after the orchestrated purge.

THUS, patriots, ask yourselves: will they be successful this go-around, regardless of who beats who in their collusive war against America’s roots, the leading force of the free world?

20150908-war

Christianity & Judaism In Cross Hairs: Gay ‘Marriage’ Unveiled. Lesbian Activist Spilled Beans. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
8
20150629B

(Aha…the communist/Marxist hammer and sickle is the true interlocking arm behind the gay agenda and its rainbow alliance…its signage)

FROM the get go, this site has zeroed in on the real agenda of the ‘Gay Mafia’ – that which constitutes the radical left – be they actual homosexuals or their heterosexual counterparts. Their authentic targets were never publicly verbalized by leading activists, that is, until they secured the imprimatur of the (left-leaning) Supreme Court.

BE that as it may, this investigative journalist understood that buzzwords – the more touchy feely the better – were necessary components for their overall agenda’s success. And if anyone believes that the loosely held hierarchy of the ‘Gay Mafia’ is not akin to a largely held corp board – via marketing strategies to the nth degree, and down to crossing its last t – well, you would be way off the mark. Granted, there are many in the gay community who are less than clued into overall decision-making, but this makes no diff. The point being, those who possess high up access to effectively create change, aka transform, are the ones who bear watching and deserve the closest scrutiny.

IN this regard, an avalanche of verbiage had to resonate with the general public. It necessitated pulling at the heart-strings and changing the national discourse upside down. And, so they did.

BUT before we head to the ‘spilled beans’, please recall the following heads up and other related matters:

HEADS UP ONE:

BACK in Sept. 2013, almost two years before gay ‘marriage’ uprooted the west’s core definition of marital union (ostensibly, like a pair of smelly socks, it was past due to throw it into the dustbin of history for  ‘necessary’ change…hmm), this site expounded: the Gay Agenda and its dangerous militancy; the complete stripping of Judeo-Christian moorings.

DECIDEDLY on target.

HEADS UP TWO:

BUT more important than being personally right (no pun intended) are the take a-ways gleaned. This is precisely why a follow on report was noted via “the ‘down low’ POTUS strikes again: ‘gay day’ lauded in Obama’s America. A Pandora’s box.”

NOT for nothing.

HEADS UP THREE:

RESULTANT, another alarm bell rung: “the Gay Mafia and its poisonous roots in academia; pedophilia and strong-arm tactics.”

MORE than compelling.

AND all of the above brings us to the Gay-in-Chief’s overturning of DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act – a foreshadowing – even though it passed both houses of Congress by large, veto-proof majorities.  

BUT that was then (1996), and this is now. Creep by creep. Yet, it is important to note that a more than seasoned investigator has come to the very same conclusions. In good company.

If you think Friday’s Supreme Court decision was about equality or equal rights for the three percent of the American population (at the expense of the 97 percent), you couldn’t be more wrong…..

America has a huge problem right now. Multiple problems, in fact, but like the victims of a train wreck, we must do triage so we can apply treatment in order of importance. The blunt force trauma inflicted upon America by five rogue members of our judiciary, redefining marriage as a result of a highly potent cabal of activists intent on America’s destruction, certainly moves this problem up the list of importance…..read the whole thing….

NOT only that, but one of the aforementioned black-robed ‘gang of five’ actually declared, in 2009, the diametrically opposed Constitutional basis: 

Over at the blog Legal Insurrection, law professor William Jacobson reminds us of this answer Elena Kagan gave to Senator John Cornyn in her confirmation hearings to be Solicitor General in 2009:

1. As Solicitor General, you would be charged with defending the Defense of Marriage Act. That law, as you may know, was enacted by overwhelming majorities of both houses of Congress (85-14 in the Senate and 342-67 in the House) in 1996 and signed into law by President Clinton. a. Given your rhetoric about the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy—you called it “a profound wrong—a moral injustice of the first order”—let me ask this basic question: Do you believe that there is a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage? Answer: There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage. b. Have you ever expressed your opinion whether the federal Constitution should be read to confer a right to same-sex marriage? If so, please provide details. Answer: I do not recall ever expressing an opinion on this question.

Emphasis added. Of course, there was no right to constitutional right to same-sex marriage right up until last week when Kagan joined four other justices on the court in creating one. Appropriately enough, your opinion of whether or not Kagan lied to Congress in her confirmation hearings depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is.

DOES (il)legal gymnastics resonate? Is social engineering the ‘new’ law of the land? These are fair and urgent questions! Kagan, what say you? To put it more bluntly, W T F?? Moreover, isn’t lying under oath an impeachable offense? Just putting it out there…

Image result for pictures of elena kagan

ENTER, the ‘spilled beans.’  Homosexual Activist Admits True Purpose of Battle is to Destroy Marriage

 (Homosexual Activist admits true purpose of battle is to destroy    marriage! Paradoxically, as a Russian-American journalist, she ignores the irony in her attempt to overthrow the traditional moorings of American society, even as she upbraids Putin’s Russia for being a totalitarian state! Wow, cognitive dissonance run amok.)

 

Even knowing that there are radicals in all movements, doesn’t  lessen the startling admission recently by lesbian journalist Masha Gessen. On a radio show she actually admits that homosexual activists are lying about their radical political agenda.  She says that they don’t want to access the institution of marriage; they want to radically redefine and eventually eliminate it. Here is what she recently said on a radio interview:

“It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie. The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago. I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.” (Source: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lifematters/why-get-married/4058506)

For quite some time, the defenders of natural marriage have attempted to point out that the true agenda behind the homosexual demands organizations is not marriage equality; it is the total unraveling of marriage and uprooting traditional values from society.  (This will ultimately include efforts to silence and punish some churches that openly adhere to their religious teachings about marriage and sexual morality.) While few have been as vocal as this lesbian activist was in this interview, we do have numerical examples proving her point.

When given the opportunity to marry, after laws have been struck down relatively small percentages of homosexuals actually bother to marry compared to their heterosexual counterparts.  This raises question about the true need to unravel marriage for the “fair” extension its benefits.  Only 12 percent of homosexuals in the Netherlands marry compared to 86 percent of their heterosexual peers.  Less than 20 percent of same-sex couples already living together in California married when given the chance in 2008.  In contrast, 91 percent of heterosexual couples in California who are living together are married.

Clearly this is about cultural change and tearing down the traditional family ethic, since it seems that most homosexuals living together neither need nor desire to marry, though they do desire to radically change marriage.

Gays and lesbians are free to live as they choose, and we live in a society which roundly applauds them doing so like never before in our history, but they do not have the right to rewrite marriage for all of society.

AGAIN, their agenda, the destruction of marriage, was obvious to those who looked past their feel-good and manipulative rhetoric. Indeed, their ultimate goal is to eviscerate the fabric of the nation into a hollowed shell, thus, priming it for a totalitarian takeover. Their campaigns seek nothing less than to (eventually) overturn American society. 

DEAR readers, the following is addressed to fellow conservatives, you know, those of us who are deemed a cross between retrograde and worse: we are basically vile meanies for refusing to recognize that ‘equality’ and ‘fairness’ are at the heart of changing the major underpinning of Judeo and Christian society; marriage between a man and a woman! You got that? 

IN other words, this segment of society must be tarred and feathered, and there is no better blueprint for said tactics than Saul Alinsky’s 12 Rules For Radicals.  

* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

* RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off-balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

YOU get the picture.

White House, buildings across the country light up in rainbow colors to celebrate gay rights

 

IN any case, the next time you hear catch-all words like ‘equality’, ‘fairness’ and the like, know that you are being played. Think of it this way: is it ‘fair’ for America’s hard-core radicals to not only destroy the institution of marriage, that which millions upon millions of citizens hold dear, but to undermine its two rocks, its foundations? 

ALAS, a two-tier battle plan must be utilized to fight back against the radicals at America’s throat. In essence, firstly, one must fully internalize where their objectives lie. Afterwards, it will be that much easier to go for the jugular. This can be accomplished through the implementation of communal push-back plans, be it rallying around religious leaders and justices of the peace who refuse to hand out any marriage licenses, to challenging them in court, and so on and so forth.

MIND you, the betrayers within the Supreme Court would have us believe that religious leaders can still refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies. The question that now remains is how the Supreme Court will balance religious freedom, which is protected under the First Amendment, with this ruling on future cases. Kennedy touched on this point in his opinion.

“Finally, it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered. The same is true of those who oppose same-sex marriage for other reasons……”

LIARS. Animated Pants on Fire

YES, we already know that some are being threatened with arrest and fines for refusing to comply with their edicts!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed a federal lawsuit and a motion for a temporary restraining order Friday to stop officials in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, from forcing two ordained Christian ministers to perform wedding ceremonies for same-sex couples. City officials told Donald Knapp that he and his wife Evelyn, both ordained ministers who run Hitching Post Wedding Chapel, are required to perform such ceremonies or face months in jail and/or thousands of dollars in fines. The city claims its “non-discrimination” ordinance requires the Knapps to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies now that the courts have overridden Idaho’s voter-approved constitutional amendment that affirmed marriage as the union of a man and a woman. “The government should not force ordained ministers to act contrary to their faith under threat of jail time and criminal fines,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeremy Tedesco. “Many have denied that pastors would ever be forced to perform ceremonies that are completely at odds with their faith, but that’s what is happening here – and it’s happened this quickly. The city is on seriously flawed legal ground, and our lawsuit intends to ensure that this couple’s freedom to adhere to their own faith as pastors is protected just as the First Amendment intended”….

REGARDLESS, this is not a battle that any non-radicalized American can afford to lose. More importantly, it is morally untenable not to lend ones assistance, whatever it entails. Incontestably, the stakes are as high as allowing the Brotherhood Mafia to take over the reins of the nation, even though they agree that same-sex marriage is a no-no.

BUT never mind all that. After all, they do insist that Shariah Law must be the law of the land, as such, the Constitution will be abrogated in toto. 

READERS, America (the west) is gripped by two devils – radical leftists and Islamists. Stake your traditional claim!

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

“Down Low” POTUS Strikes Again: “Gay Day” Lauded In Obama’s America! A Pandora’s Box…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
25

Image result for pics of obama and reggie love

(Oh yeah…the cozy twosome….so much hunk of lovin’….)

TRULY, in the same manner in which an individual’s heterosexuality is their personal business, similarly, it should be when living an alternative lifestyle. Live and let live.

“BUT NOOOO!”, homosexual/transgender front-groups abuse particular entry points (media, academia, legal, cultural and PC trigger/subliminal mechanisms) as societal bludgeons. Hammer-like, they are wielded against those who refuse to shed their traditional views on marriage and family. Thus, they have declared war, and traditional Americans dare not sit on the sidelines. You got that?? 

LET’s be very clear: it matters not a whit to this investigative journalist what CONSENTING adults do within their own private domain. After all, since when is it anybody’s business which acts (legal age) individuals perform, and with whom? Just leave those of us who are traditional in outlook the hell out of said private (emphasis placed) business. And herein lies the thrust.

YES, it absolutely becomes the people’s business when a militant agenda is being rammed down their throats, at the same time that said demands are backed up by those in top leadership. Agreed? As is said, this is where the rubber meets the road.

IN this regard, the “Gay Mafia” enters the discussion, yet, no one should be naive enough to believe that said appendage is derogatory or hyperbolic. If only.

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, the following should serve as exhibits (and testimony) to the grave damage inflicted upon America by the “Gay Mafia.” Its leader (as will be proven, once again) is the “Down Low” POTUS, as he continuously despoils the People’s House at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Precisely, this is why “Gay Day” is not only on his radar, but CELEBRATED via his bully pulpit! Mind you, none of it has to do with so-called “equality” and the ability to love ones partner. Smokescreens.  

Maybe he could have convinced them that they need to work on their tolerance. To that end, since he’s declared it an international day of celebration, why not load the family and a few select friends into Air Force One for a road trip to Saudi Arabia or his new best friends in Iran. They could invite Reggie Love and really do it up right.

Obama said in his statement that he’s working to “address the specific needs of transgender persons.” He’s not talking about psychiatric help – pills, implants and a political declaration of normal are all they’re lacking. They are entitled to them and they’re free now under Obamacare. The taxpayers can afford anything.

“Michelle and I join our fellow Americans and others around the world in commemorating the International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia tomorrow, May 17.  We take this opportunity to reaffirm that lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights are human rights, to celebrate the dignity of every person, and to underscore that all people deserve to live free from fear, violence, and discrimination, regardless of who they are or whom they love.

We work toward this goal every day. Here at home, [The White House?] we are working to end bias-motivated violence, combat discrimination in the workplace, and address the specific needs of transgender persons.  Overseas, I am proud of the steps that the United States has taken to prioritize the protection and promotion of LGBT rights in our diplomacy and global outreach.

There is much more to do, and this fight for equality will not be won in a day.  But we will keep working, at home and abroad, and we will keep fighting, for however long it takes until we are all able to live free and equal in dignity and rights.”

Bathhouse Barry Obama issued a statement on Saturday indicating that he and his partner would be commemorating an International Day Against Homophobia and Transphobia on Sunday. It’s probably not an accident that he chose the traditional Christian day of worship for his celebration of sodomy. He could have announced it on a week day but that wouldn’t have had the symbolism. Friday was an option, the Muslim day of worship, that he also chose to forego.

HOW magnanimous…oh, not at all self-serving…

ONCE again, let’s play connect the dots.

DOT ONE:

BACK in Feb. 2013, a particular commentary swirled around the web like a house on fire. Now, that was a good result but only because of the seriousness of the situation. The fact that it was written in a certain manner, well, chalk it up to a stylistic approach.

A guy’s gotta do what he’s gotta do, even if one is the leader of the free world. As many are aware, there are certain urges which can’t be squelched, at least if one is used to doing whatever, wherever, and whoever one desires. Such is the case with Barack HUSSEIN Obama, the master of his domain. The universe too.

Some may have missed this bit of news: the POTUS partook in a “mini golf vacation” last weekend (wifey was away with “the girls”, but don’t scoff, let’s not be mean spirited, they all needed a good rest from their Hawaiian vacation, a little over a month ago), but who can keep up with his/their jaunts. Besides, we are not talking about a hard worker. Alas, he needs his nappy time, nookie time and golf time, but not necessary in that order.

Regardless, his R & R didn’t sit well with the usual subservient, lap dog White House press corps, you know, the guys and gals hanging in thrall with his every word. They moaned and groaned about their TOTAL lack of access. Poor dears…they should live a day in this blogger’s shoes…what do they have to complain about?

‘Private club: Obama spends 3rd straight day hidden on links’….

One shouldn’t think that Reggie Love inducted him into the “down low” lifestyle, not at all. Recall, Rev Wright and his “guiding” hands….

For the real record, let’s just conclude that the work-weary POTUS required some “down time”. So he went golfing in Florida, and then mixed it up with some ” good lovin’ “.

As “Porky Pig” always signed off, ” That’s All Folks” ! – www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBzJGckMYO4

DOT TWO:

OF course, aside from the Gay-in-Chief’s personal proclivities, the fact remains that he has an entire “Gay Mafia” (U.S. and Euro-based) at his disposal and he is now its titular head. No kidding.

ABSOLUTELY, HUSSEIN Obama’s Gay Lobby knows no bounds, so much so that they extended their iron fist to Russia. Say what? Well, they even interfered with a Russian Minster who happened to be protecting the rights of traditional families. Evil. 

THE twisted Gay Mafia perpetually campaigns for adult-child sex, as pedophiles can never satisfy their perverted obsessions. Pointedly, the Gay-in-Chief eviscerated DOMA by ensuring that the epicenter of western norms – the marriage between a man and a woman – was knocked down. Beyond contemptible. Devilish.

ALAS, a preponderance of western profs pollute the public space, be it within America or outside its confines, and they are gunning for the kiddies. This is a fact.

As WND reported, a book published in 2005 featured multiple Ph.D. “experts” claiming that sex with children “can benefit” boys and even serve a “mentoring function.”

SO there we have it: an “educated” twist is lent to the Gay Mafia (wherever they hail from), as deviant academics “kosher” pedophilia’s “natural normalcy”! Orwellian.

AND since little happens in a vacuum, the slippery slope is, as mentioned, careening America off the cliff, as well as those throughout the western world.

ENTER…the war on bakeries and pizzerias. Come on, must they have their claws into every establishment, even mom and pop businesses? Mind you, there are “special” exemptions for those who refuse, based on religious convictions, to service gay couples with specific wedding plans. Yes, there are. Now, readers, put on your thinking caps, and decide which grouping is let off their Mafia-like hook.

THESE modern-day storm troopers conveniently forget the fact that gays are killed in Muslim countries (and so on and so forth), but they are terrified of Muslim backlash. Hence, they are left unmolested. On the other hand, Christians (Jews) are “fair” game and the main (extortion) targets of the Gay Mafia.

FOR crying aloud, what the hell is going on in America? Moreover, why is it unacceptable for Christians (Jews alike) to exert their “religious rights” to refuse clients based on a particular inquiry for service? Are they now second class citizens? Apparently.

CONSEQUENTLY, it is increasingly apparent that the militant Gay Lobby must be taught certain primary and street-wise lessons. Boundaries. For instance, if they refuse to cease and desist in their criminal harassment/threats against Christians, perhaps they should learn that a fearsome backlash will be the outcome of any future intimidation tactics. Surely, they must internalize that the Christian (or Jewish) community will react accordingly.

INDEED, the Gay Mafia believes it is their “civil right” to terrorize bakeries, pizzerias and other PRIVATE establishments who decline to decorate their “wedding” cakes and the like. The question becomes: what’s going to be done to cause them to stand down? Time will tell.

DOT THREE:

FOR heavens sake, even America’s toilets – kiddie ones too – aren’t off limits. Is this normal behavior, or is there a VERY targeted agenda at hand? You decide.

IT goes without saying – at least it should – that when a militant minority attempts to impose its unilateral will on the majority, well, the end result will be fascist in nature. In other words, be it through subversive means, the inversion of democratic principles (via screams of “equality”, even as they completely trample upon the majority’s rights) or outright threats, bullying and intimidation tactics, a liberal-based society is turned upside down before the majority realizes what hit them. Ain’t that the truth.

RESULTANT, the latest verbal gymnastics from the courts, that a “father” and “son” can marry, is what is termed in legal jargon as the slippery slope principle.

Slippery slope principle refers to an argument that every relaxation of a constitutionally imposed restraint is an invitation to justify some other or further relaxation of that restraint…

MOREOVER, activist courts expose an overriding danger, one which emanates via judicial fiat for the purpose of social engineering. This basis is best demonstrated via the following case in point:

In United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry, the Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of government policies that reflect traditional marriage—that is, marriage as a union between one man and one woman. If the Court does not dismiss these cases on jurisdictional grounds, it should act to uphold traditional marriage. Nothing in the Court’s jurisprudence suggests that the right of same-sex couples to have their relationships recognized as marriages is so fundamental as to be protected by the Constitution’s Due Process Clause. Nor does the Equal Protection Clause require that result, given the societal purpose and value of marriage as furthering procreation and child-rearing. Because the Constitution does not speak to this question, it is one that is left to ordinary political processes, not to judicial fiat.

IN effect, by legally (and mentally) eviscerating one previously inviolate line after another, most inherently, that marriage is between a man and a woman, more and more pressure points are exploited to TOTALLY destroy America’s edifices. Their end point is a complete and utter toppling, one which previously upheld and defined the national ethos. Diabolical. 

TO wit, the above has been the “Gay Mafia’s” goal for decades. However, their plans are moving at warp speed, all “credit” to the Down Low-in-Chief ala a compliant/highly activist judiciary and like-minded surrogates! 

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

%d bloggers like this: