Billy Boy Clinton’s Presidency: Marred By Much More Than Diddling An Intern…A Tale of Islamic Jihad Cover Ups…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

What does the Oklahoma City 1995 bombing have in common with TWA Flight 800? More to the point, what don’t they have in common? In fact, both tragedies occurred under Clinton’s Presidency and have proven to be travesties of American injustice. Cover ups galore. Islamic jihad too.

Oh dear, this is so yesteryear, why is this site dredging up old national wounds? Aren’t the dead already buried and shouldn’t we just let them rest in peace? And what about their loved ones and their pain…never mind Bill’s discomfit, Hill’s as well. Again, why the trip down memory lane, isn’t the reign of Obama Inc torturous enough?

Well, as luck would have it – or not, depending on whether the truth is your barometer – this blog has explored the penchant for Demster (throw in an occasional Repub too) cover ups, and the parts played by their media lap dogs. And it is not as if this is “news” herein, but it is highly relevant (satisfying as well) that explosive film footage is now upping the ante. How so?

Yet before we go to this week’s “news”, let us begin at the beginning of said disasters and the media’s complicity factor. Mind you, without a compliant media none of the skeletons stay buried. None at all. As such, when a parroting media ceases their due diligence, all manner of white washes – or in this case, Allah-washing – becomes possible.

Specifically, re Oklahoma City’s 1995 bombing: Most significantly, R. James Woolsey, Director of Central Intelligence,1993-1995 tells a different tale too, diametrically opposed to the media proffered version, a version conjured up by the highest denizens in the Justice Dept. In fact, Woolsey is so convinced of the veracity of his claims, he penned an attribution for the back cover of an explosive book, ‘The Third Terrorist’ (http://www.jaynadavis.com/) decrying the official version, dutifully reported by a compliant media! Media digging for facts….. what’s that?

R. James Woolsey, even though a part of the establishment, is first and foremost a patriot.  ”This fascinating product of Jayna Davis’s near-decade of brave, thorough, and dogged investigative reporting effectively shifts the burden of proof to those who would still contend that McVeigh and Nichols executed the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing without the support of a group or groups from the Middle East.”

To make a very long story short, here’s the deal from a few in the know –

Frank J. Gaffney Jr., President of the Center for Security Policy stated ” With the publication of this fascinating account, Jayna Davis will be recognized for what she is:an outstanding journalist willing to risk everything – her career, her financial security, even her life –  to discover and illuminate the facts about foreign complicity in the murderous 1995 bombing in Oklahoma City. Thanks to her book, these facts can no longer be ignored, or concealed. And those who Ms Davis reveals have systematically done both for nearly a decade must be called to account.”

Dr. Constance C. Menges, Former Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and former National Intelligence Officer, CIA contends ”With enormous skill, courage, and persistence, Jayna Davis pursued the foreign terrorist connections to the tragic attack on the federal building in Oklahoma. Now her fast-paced-book reveals the facts that the Clinton administration did not want to confront. This is a must-read for all who want to see beyond the headlines.” Indeed.

And Dan Vogel, FBI Special Agent (retired), former Public Information Officer for Oklahoma City FBI field office added this “This is a must-read for anyone trying to figure out what our government has been doing (or not doing) for the past decade to protect this country from international terrorists. Jayna’s book will chill your blood then make it boil.”

Having spent considerable time researching the above for a related project, it is beyond a shadow of a doubt, what the government purposefully hid from the public – with the aid of a non-inquiring media – led in multiple ways to 9/11/01, though not exclusively so. The point being, keeping facts hidden from the public has deadly consequences, allowing them to operate with their eyes glued shut! –https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/what-happens-when-a-compliant-media-ceases-their-due-diligence-thus-parroting-officialdoms-narratives-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Yet the cast of characters who covered for wild Bill are still operating, some under the radar, others right inside Obama Inc – recycled garbage-like. Then, as now, the goal of those who shield Islamic terror are of like-mind. Bringing down America – in order to “reshape/transform” her – is part of the global re-ordering – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/02/adina-kutnickis-book-review-featured-at-american-thinker-bringing-down-america-an-fbi-informer-with-the-weathermen-written-by-larry-grathwohl-and-frank-reagan-updated-2013-edition/.

So what’s the “news”?

‘BRAND-NEW TWA 800 FILM TO FINALLY SPILL BEANS?’

Jack Cashill exposed corruption behind original investigation

Seventeen years after the Paris-bound TWA Flight 800 blew up off the coast of Long Island, producers Tom Stalcup and Kristina Borjesson have released a new documentary –simply titled “TWA Flight 800” – that has the very real potential to re-open the investigation into the plane’s destruction.

Kudos, in particular, to Stalcup. A Ph.D. physicist by background, he has dedicated the last 16 years of his life to exposing what is arguably the most flagrant government cover-up in American peacetime history.

Borjesson has likewise been involved from the beginning. As a producer at CBS in 1996 when TWA 800 was destroyed, she sacrificed her future at CBS to get at the truth. Together, they have produced a documentary that is compelling, convincing and, finally, deeply moving.

Jack Cashill and James Sanders exposed the corrupt TWA 800 investigation in their book “First Strike” — get it now at WND’s Superstore

The producers made two strategic moves to force the media to look seriously at their conclusions. One was to rely heavily on the testimony of a half-dozen highly credible whistleblowers from within the investigation.

The second was to avoid politics. When James Sanders and I produced the video documentary “Silenced” on this subject 12 years ago and the book “First Strike” two years after that, we made the marketing mistake of identifying the logic of the cover-up.

That logic led to the White House. Sixteen years ago, in the home stretch of a difficult re-election campaign, Bill Clinton faced a problem very similar to one that Barack Obama would face in 2012. This is something the media did not want to know, let alone share.

An event took place that threatened the “peace and prosperity” theme of his campaign – specifically, the shoot-down of this doomed airliner with 230 people on board 12 minutes out of JFK.

Although the word was not used back then, the Clinton White House, with the help of a complicit media, rewrote the event’s “narrative” to assure re-election. Again, as with Benghazi, that narrative was clumsily improvised almost on a daily basis.

Knowing the media had his back, Clinton responded much as Obama did: deny, obfuscate and kick the investigatory can down the road until after the election.

One central figure appeared in each drama: Hillary Clinton. She stood by Obama’s side in the Rose Garden on Sept. 12 as he spun reality into confection.

Throughout that long night of July 17, 1996, she holed up with Bill and Sandy Berger in the White House family quarters, assessing their narrative options much as Obama did on Sept. 11, 2012.

By removing politics from the equation, Stalcup, who appeared in “Silenced,” and Borjesson have attracted a fair share of major media attention.

In their well-researched recreation of the plane’s final minutes, they wisely refrain from saying who pulled the trigger. But the evidence that someone fired missiles at the plane overwhelms the dispassionate observer.

Through file footage and commentary, the producers do an unerring job of showing how the forces of government –particularly Jim Kallstrom of the FBI and certain actors at the NTSB – conspired to misdirect the investigation.

The video closes with names and images of those who refused to be interviewed. Several, including Kallstrom, appeared in the video in news footage. The final refusenik is Bill Clinton. He had a lot to hide.

In a confidential taped interview with historian Taylor Branch on Aug. 2, 1996, Clinton laid the blame for TWA 800’s destruction on Iran. “They want war,” he told Branch.

Clinton may or may not have been lying, but he did not want to mess with Iran, at least not right before an election he already had in the bag.

To control the post-crash narrative, the White House allowed the FBI to talk only to The New York Times. Four weeks after the disaster, the Times would report, “Now that investigators say they think the center fuel tank did not explode, they say the only good explanations remaining are that a bomb or a missile brought down the plane.”

A missile attack was too obvious and ominous. So a week later, likely under White House pressure, and without any new evidence, the FBI shifted its storyline fully away from a missile to a bomb.

“Prime Evidence Found That Device Exploded in Cabin of Flight 800,” reported the Times above the fold on Aug. 23, just a few days before the Democratic National Convention.

The Times reached this conclusion by interviewing exactly none of the 270 FBI eyewitnesses to a likely missile strike. Sanders and I interviewed scores of them, as do Stalcup and Borjesson.

But even this scenario threatened the peace and prosperity message to be promoted at the Democratic National Convention just days away. And so the story was allowed to die. For the next three weeks, there was no meaningful reporting at all.

In mid-September, two months after the crash, the FBI shifted the narrative once again from a bomb to a center fuel tank explosion, a possibility that had been ruled out a month earlier. The other media unquestioningly followed the Times. They too had a president to re-elect.

Without ever raising its voice, “TWA Flight 800” makes mincemeat out of the mechanical failure explanation. Stalcup walks the viewer knowingly through one set of evidence after another.

In an emotional sequence towards the documentary’s end, a young female family member of one of the deceased sums up the anguish that she and so many others close to the investigation have felt: “It’s very frustrating that nobody gives a sh** anymore.”

One suspects that Hillary “What difference does it make” Clinton would have only confirmed this woman’s worst suspicions.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/brand-new-twa-800-film-to-finally-spill-beans/#XuTjFzRbZv9H6sjh.99

Readers, it was not long ago (back in 2005) that this blogger penned an explosive op-ed, ‘The Opening of Jihad On U.S. Soil’, at Israel National News, essentially tying in Billy boy’s Presidency with dereliction of duty regarding Islamic jihad. Its efficacy lies within knowledge gleaned through less than six degrees of separation from original sources- https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/06/22/the-opening-of-jihad-on-us-soil-2/. And it is this proximity which renders said claims all the more explosive, even though the opening act of jihad occurred back in 1990. Enough said.

Boston’s Chechen Bombers AND Their Saudi Counterpart(s): The “Non-Person of Interest”…Time To Smoke Him Out…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Pre-schoolers have a penchant for fertile imaginations, and it accounts for many of the monsters hiding under their toddler beds. And who hasn’t hugged them tight and comforted them from their bogeymen. But it also doesn’t mean that some of their fabrications aren’t self serving, especially when a handy treat (or two…or three…) awaits their sob story. Oh well, what is acceptable (often delicious) among the pre-school/toddler set is certainly off limits for adults, especially those in leadership positions! Or so one would think.

So when multiple bombs exploded in Boston this past April 15, rational folks expected that the powers that be had their facts straight, or at least fielded in the same direction. NOT so fast.

The question herein has been asked and answered: when does a person of interest cease to become one, at least under the criminal regime of Obama Inc? – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/17/when-is-a-person-of-interest-no-longer-one-the-wahhabi-roots-linking-jihad-in-boston-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And when Iranian and Saudi jihad fuse, a wholly owned Obama media jumps to the regime’s rescue, even to the point of blaming “right wing” America for Islamic-fueled barbarism, as body parts littered Boston’s streets – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/20/iran-its-proxy-arm-saudi-infused-jihad-too-leftist-hysteria-media-cover-ups-and-refugees-from-hostile-nations-where-will-this-confluence-of-evil-end-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Where are their inquiring minds? Flushed down the rabbit hole.

Adding insult to grave injury, if this American-Israeli knew about the Brotherhood’s “mobbed up” tentacles in Boston, with special focus paid to Cambridge and surrounding ‘nabes, then surely the authorities should have…or so one would think…and this was written Aug. 2012, a full 8 months before Boston’s jihad – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/the-muslim-student-association-msa-islamic-student-arm-of-muslim-brotherhoodmuslim-mafia-huma-abedin-board-member-too-what-does-this-meancommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …which in turn led the trail herein – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/27/bombers-cambridge-ma-mosque-a-mirror-image-of-us-mosquestied-into-mit-local-us-linking-back-to-brotherhood-mafias-msamsu-student-unions-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/The Feds should start putting “you know who” on their payroll, having done much of the heavy lifting!

Alas, this blog wants to connect the dots, unlike Obama & surrogates, may they be damned to purgatory. As such, the Chechen connection with Saudi & Hezbollah Iranian agents became clear as bell, yet the Feds were – and still are – too busy covering up for the Islamist-in-Chief’s connections. So much so, in fact, justice for the bombing victims AND America will surely be swept under the rug, if  patriots don’t hound them – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/22/the-chechen-connection-its-saudi-intersection-hezbollah-shadows-double-agents-will-the-feds-come-clean-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. No matter, let us  use Oklahoma City as a blueprint for their deception, as Clinton’s mouthpieces wiped out Allah’s soldiers from the carnage, whitewashing the Mid East connection…oh yeah, McVeigh and Nichols were “lone wolves” – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/what-happens-when-a-compliant-media-ceases-their-due-diligence-thus-parroting-officialdoms-narratives-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Now let’s turn our rapt attention to the “disappearing” Saudi; now you see him, now you don’t. You know, the one who is at first a “person of interest”, but currently someone who has disappeared down the rabbit hole…Alice-in-Wonderland-like!

‘Is There A Third Boston Marathon Bomber?’

MAY 7, 2013 BY  – video embedded

In George Orwell’s famous dystopian novel 1984, high officials direct robotic bureaucrats to alter the past—“pushed down the memory hole” is the famous phrase–all in order to prop up the state apparatus. Names are changed, facts disappear, and new facts are born.

Let’s look at the past for a moment:

April 15, 2013, at 2:29 p.m.: a bomb goes off near the finish line of the Boston Marathon. A second bomb goes off thirteen seconds later.

A Saudi national by the name of Abdul Rahman Ali Alharbi, near ground zero of the first blast, receives significant injuries to his legs, consisting of burns and embedded shrapnel.

He immediately runs from the scene and is quickly tackled by a bystander, thinking he is the bomber.

The police take him into custody and transport him to the hospital. At this point, he is only a person of interest.

By 4:46 p.m., he is named as a suspect and placed under armed guard.

At exactly 7:29 p.m., over twenty ATF, FBI, and DHS agents swarm Alharbi’s apartment in nearby Revere, carrying out dozens of bags of evidence.

Alharbi is quickly identified as having some connection to the bombing.

Slam dunk. Suspect identified and held accountable. Game over.

Not exactly. Enter the Saudi government.

At 10:00 a.m. the next day, Secretary of State John Kerry meets with with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal. Shortly thereafter, President Obama meets with the Saudi ambassador, Adel al-Jubeir. Both meetings are unscheduled and held in secret (and more than likely concern Alharbi.)

At 4 p.m. the following day,  a criminal file is created for Alharbi, charging him with terrorism and linking him to the Boston bombing. The NTC (National Terrorism Center), under ICE,  classifies the matter under section 212 3B,  “Security and related grounds/Terrorist activities.” The Obama administration deems Alharbi a national security threat, but instead of arresting him, recommends he be deported.

Later that evening, Investigative Project on Terrorism chief Steve Emerson says on the Sean Hannity Show that according to his sources, Alharbi is being quietly deported at the request of the Saudi government.

At 5:35 p.m., Alharbi’s deportation file is altered—“cauterized” was the word an insider used— authorized from the highest levels, revoking deportation and further made to look like no deportation proceedings had been initiated.

This alteration is authorized by either the head of the National Security Agency or State Department (and may have been directly authorized by Barack Hussein Obama himself.)

When this information begins to leak to the media, Secretary of Homeland Security JanetNapolitano is summoned before Congress and questioned about the matter. She calls the information a rumor,  stating that Alharbi was not being deported and that he was never a suspect (and, when pressed, refuses to answer any further questions.)

The same day, ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) states that the information about Alharbi is “categorically false.”

But according to a Congressional Source, the information released was in fact completely accurate.

Alharbi was in fact linked to the Boston terrorist attack. The Congressman who questioned Janet Napolitano, Rep. Jeff Duncan, was actually in possession of Alharbi’s file and knew that Napolitano was lying.

What else did we know about Alharbi?

When he received his student visa, he had been on a terrorist watch list and should have never been allowed into the country.

He has at least a dozen connections to al-Qaeda members, some presently being held in Gitmo.

And, probably most shocking of all, he was a regular visitor at the White House.

This is most likely the main reason Barack Obama tried to whisk him out of the country so quickly.

But alas, all was shoved down the memory hole, never to be heard about again.

Names were changed, facts disappeared, and new facts were born.

Welcome to Barack Hussein Obama’s 1984.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/is-there-a-third-boston-marathon-bomber/

There comes a time when some lies no longer hold up under their own enormity, as evidenced within Benghazigate. Its pile of dung is blowing apart, even as this is being written. And it doesn’t take a genius to figure out the following: once an inveterate liar always a liar. But just as in Benghazigate (and hopefully Fast & Furious), it will take alternative media to shine a spotlight on the recesses of Obama Inc’s evil. Bear in mind, Oklahoma City may have turned its screws on Clinton Inc, if alternative media had been in place. 

Thus, it behooves this blog to lead the readership in a main direction, in the expectation they will extrapolate therein. Concomitantly, on top of all the evidence amassed in previously related commentaries, the caveat becomes: why was Alharbi a visitor at the White House, and a REGULAR one at that? The blood staining the streets, due to Boston’s jihad, flows from there!