Taming The Islamic Beast Via Re-Tread (U.S.) Diplos & Assorted Western Poohbahs: Nothing Short Of A Western Disaster…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

How many spend quality time around the toddler set, you know those cutie patooties who are learning to speak (understanding more than most realize), yet often come out with pearls of wisdom? You might rightfully wonder: What do toddlers have to say, they can hardly string a full sentence together? Well, sometimes “out of the mouth of babes” really strikes a deep chord, and this is one such point in time.

So while “negotiating” with a nearest and dearest from the very same toddler set, was caught dumbstruck when the little one exhorted to a (seemingly reasonable) request with: “blah, blah, blah!” In effect, even while still learning to talk, he understood that the way to shut down the conversation was to make it known – from the get go – that he doesn’t accept said terms of the discussion and wasn’t having any more of it . He turned his back and toddled away! Surely others have had similar experiences, but what does this personal anecdote have to do with the “price of tea in China”? Everything.

In the west’s fruitless, toothless and insane quest to “tame” the Islamic beast, they have come up with nothing more than (less than even temporary) ploys to bribe Muslims to behave in a civilized manner. However, Allah’s adherents are having none of it, and in word and deed they are giving the west the “blah, blah, blah” treatment on behalf of their Ummah – “The Arabic word umma , derived from umm (‘mother’), is a term used in Islam to denote the worldwide community of the faithful. In the twentieth century, the term was sometimes used by Arabs to mean “nation” in a political sense, both in global terms (the pan-Arab umma) and local terms (a specific nation).”

To our collective western horror a preponderance in leadership positions, ranging from political, media, cultural, legal and academic circles, haven’t a clue how to deal with their “intransigence”.Therefore, they must sit at Prof Eidelberg’s knees (described herein – https://adinakutnicki.com/about/) and learn their lessons well, even if they are too old to attend formal schooling. The west can no longer tolerate their blindness and fecklessness.

‘A Muslim for Sale?’
Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Thomas R. Pickering is back. Spells trouble.
Pickering, former U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs, is considered by many the ultimate American career diplomat. That’s double trouble. He has held ambassadorial posts in Russia, the U.N., and Israel. He is still being called upon by the administration to lead important investigations, including one into the killing last fall of the American ambassador to Libya—the right choice for a cover-up of Obama’s post-American State Department.
Pickering, we hear, is now heading a panel of former senior U.S. officials and outside “experts” called “The Iran Project.” The creature is urging President Obama to drop sanctions and covert action against Iran, and instead negotiate more intensively with Tehran. Surprised?
Not if you’ve heard former U.S. Ambassador John Bolton on FOX News, or better, read his book Surrender is Not an Option (2007), where he anticipated Obama’s powder puff policy toward Iran.  Bolton is not an academic lapdog diplomat ala Pickering. He has taken on the State Department: said it’s dominated by moral relativists. Reminds me of 1933, when Ivy League academics urged the Roosevelt Administration to recognize the Soviet Union despite its blatant commitment to America’s destruction.
Remember Soviet dictator Khrushchev’ boast “We’ll bury you!”  It’s reverberating in Iran, whose dictator gleefully boats “Death to America!”
American diplomats tainted by the university-bred doctrine of moral relativism would be out of a job if they took such threats seriously. Indeed, if the State Department was not so tainted by what Bolton calls “moral equivalence,” State would not be so liberal granting the likes of the Boston Marathon Bombers free rides in America. Nothing new about State’s ethical neutrality.
The same most highly educated department of American government advocated diplomatic relations with Iraq, a military despotism headed by the butcher of Baghdad, Saddam Hussein. Juxtapose the Iraqi study group of 2006. Included was the Polish-born Harvard professor Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski, reputedly an anti-Semite, served as Billy Carter’s National Security adviser. But get this. His book Political Power US-USSR reveals him as a moral relativist. He advocated a non-ideological foreign policy even toward the Soviet Union!
“Accommodation” with the country of the Gulag concentration camps was both the advice of his books and the policy of the humanistic Carter Administration. Unsurprisingly, Brzezinski, an internationalist, had the ear of the “cosmopolitan” Barack Obama in 2008. Brzezinski harbors the crypto-Marxist dogma that all ideological conflicts are irrational, that to risk death and destruction in the name of doctrines having no absolute or universal validity is absurd. This dogma underlies the concept of “conflict resolution” which permeates political science departments even to the extent to having a home in the Begin-Sadat Center at Bar-Ilan University. It is remarkable how democracies dignify despots.
Be that as it may, Obama, like Brzezinski, has been in bed with Jew-haters and Islamophiles for years. Suffice it to mention Louis Farrakhan and Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Obama attended Wright’s church for 20 years, despite the pastor’s brazen anti-Americanism. No wonder: Obama is the only American presidential candidate to have been endorsed by Hamas, Israel’s mortal enemy! And this is not all.
Recall Daniel Kurtzer, U.S. ambassador to Israel from 2001 to 2005. Kurtzer received his Ph.D. from Columbia University, at which Barack Obama was a student. Like many universities, Columbia was a seedbed of moral relativism. It was also a venue for the “New Left.”
Kurtzer not only advocated a Palestinian state with eastern Jerusalem as its capital. He advocated a contiguous Palestinian state connected with Gaza, the effect of which would split Israel in two. How remarkable! Kurtzer studied at Yeshiva University, where I once served as a visiting professor. I was astonished by the moral relativism free-floating and virtually unnoticed at that reputedly orthodox religious institution. So I was not astonished by Kurtzer’s orthodox religious reputation. Relativism, the mental disorder of democracy’s old-age, emasculates academics, many of whom enter government and become useful idiots. Would it be inappropriate to say that a member of that madding crowd now occupies the Oval Office?
Does its occupant really believe that Pickering can pull a rabbit out of Iran?  Or, has he been afflicted by a syndrome common to capitalists and socialists alike, that Muslims can be bought?
In particular, several commentaries shore up the above’s urgency and efficacy, and none more than ‘Islam & Blood’ (https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/), the underlying blood pact which fuels their jihad. As such Islamic jihad (stealth or frontal) is immutable, immovable, hence, non-negotiable. Thereby, a similarly “take it or leave it” western response must be instituted post haste.
YET the leader of the free world is wedded to jaw-jaw notions for “conflict resolution” (the Islamist-in-Chief must post haste confab with the ever patient Prof for a primer on, ‘Using Conflict-Resolution Tools In Arab-Israel Conflict’ – http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/11897#.UYOxBbX-Fn0) and millions will die on its altar. Israel, if it chooses survival over “going along to get along”, must disconnect its foreign policy effectively from Washington’s, at least until Iran is dealt with. 
The readers realize by now that the Pyromaniac-in-Chief has a  goal: to buy the mullah’s time to gain the bomb (blatherings aside…as Barack HUSSEIN Obama opines, “US Could Prevent Nuclear Iran” – http://www.france24.com/en/20130314-obama-says-us-could-prevent-iran-nuclear-bomb…yet in a recent Mid East arms deal he left out the MOST important weapon of all for Israel to go it alone – the largest bunker buster bombs required – http://flashtrafficblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/u-s-israel-sign-new-arms-deal-but-obama-team-refuses-to-sell-bunker-buster-bombs-what-message-does-that-send-to-iran/) and the reasons are multi-faceted. In reality, they will hardly matter when bodies start exploding, both in Israel and America.
Thus, is “blah, blah, blah” that off the mark, especially when describing where the west is at, in juxtaposition to reality on the ground?

Islamic-Jihadi Indoctrination Camps: Hamas/PA/Fatah Style..They’re Not Boy/Girl Scouts! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those of us who dare posit the truth, thereby pointing out the obvious, are tarred and feathered as bigots and warmongers. You know the drill, the never say YES to “peace” and all that jazz. But never mind. Some of us are not sitting on our brains, and yes, we can see from there to here. Sticks and stones…

But let’s not get sucked into navel gazing, thereby playing into the hands of those who prefer to separate the “good” terrorist from the bad. As far as the left is concerned, including Israel’s obsessive “peace” chasers, the good cop/bad cop routine never wavers, lynchings beside the point. As to the PA/Fatah’s kiddies, let’s just say that “peaceniks” are aware of the following, but said reality doesn’t create a ripple effect, not even close –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/01/pa-statehood-its-violations-of-international-law-u-s-leadership-must-addressadhere-to-legal-constructs-israels-peace-obsessed-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. It’s like talking to the wall. Spitting in the wind.

Regardless, the sane among us must charge forward, otherwise we leave the outcome in the hands of the irredeemably evil and their deluded helpers. Bowing out is not an option.

‘No Jihadist Left Behind – Rachel Ehrenfeld, Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center’


Tuesday, May 14th, 2013

No child is left behind the new mandatory Jihadist education program in Gaza.

Muslim Brotherhood’s ideologue and chairman of the International Federation of Muslim Clerics, Youssef Qaradawi, was surely proud to see that his decades-long virulent preaching for Muslims to “carry out Jihad to death,” has been taken seriously by HAMAS.

Tens of thousands of teenage boys in the Gaza Strip have been receiving weekly jihadist/terrorist training in school, as part of the mandatory “Al-Futuwwa” (Youth Courage) program. Videos of the program have been posted on YouTube to further the radicalization of Arabic-speaking Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

The Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center* exposé should leave no illusions regarding “peace” in the region anytime soon.

“Hamas has introduced a program in Gaza Strip schools called Al-Futuwwa, which provides military training for tens of thousands of adolescent boys.”

1. Since September 2012 Hamas has run a new program called Al-Futuwwa (“youth,” “courage”) in high schools in the Gaza Strip. In the program, tens of thousands of adolescent Gazan boys receive theoretical and practical military training.

The program has three components: military classes are held weekly in the schools, there are two-week training camps held during school breaks, and practical activities carried out with operatives of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ military-terrorist wing. An article in the British newspaper The Guardian recentlymreported that the weekly classes are part of the curriculum for 37,000 boys aged 15 to 17, of whom about 5,000 have participated in the training camps. They train with Kalashnikov assault rifles and learn how to use hand grenades and detonate IEDs.

2. The military training program is part of comprehensive indoctrination and practical activities held by Hamas for the younger generation in the Gaza Strip.

The activities which begin in kindergarten and continue on into university, are meant to raise a new generation of motivated military and political operatives and activists and to brainwash them with Hamas ideology (the so-called “liberation of Palestine,” refusal to recognize the State of Israel or its right to exist, nurturing the path of jihad and fostering radical Islam).

3. Hamas expects that this new generation will participate in the armed campaign against Israel as operatives in the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades and will integrate into the Hamas movement and administrative activities, thus ensuring Hamas’ long-term control of the Gaza Strip. Another of the program’s objectives is to reinforce the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades’ image as an “army of the people” operating in the service of the movement’s administration, as opposed to the military terrorist wings of the other terrorist organizations, whose role is secondary and which represent affiliation with one faction or another.

Military Training in Gazan High Schools within the Framework of Al-Futuwwa

4. During 2012, called by the de-facto Hamas administration “the year of Palestinian education,” Hamas introduced a program in its high schools called Al-Futuwwa (“youth,” “courage”). Its objective was to integrate military studies into the schools run by Hamas to raise a new generation of operatives and activists to “serve the homeland” and “expel the Zionist occupation from the land of Palestine” (Hamas forum website, January 24, 2013). The ministries of education and the interior of the de-facto Hamas administration direct the program with the support of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades and Hamas’ security services.

5. An article in the British paper The Guardian recently reported on Al-Futuwwa. Its main points were the following [ITIC emphasis throughout]

a) The high school curriculum includes weekly classes in which boys become familiar with Kalashnikov assault rifles and other weapons. Instructors from the interior ministry’s national security services also teach first aid, firefighting and the values of “discipline and responsibility.” Parents can remove their sonsfrom the program but rarely do so.

b) To supplement the course there are voluntary camps during school breaks, in which boys are instructed in how to handle guns and explosives.

The Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades operatives assist in the training using live ammunition and real explosives (Note: See the military display below, photographed at the Gamal Abdel Nasser School in Sajaiya in the eastern Gaza Strip).

c) 3) According to the Hamas ministry of education, the course is now part of the curriculum for about 37,000 pupils aged 15 to 17. So far, about 5,000 have participated in the training camps. A 17 year-old boy (called “Mohammed” in the article) said that he spent six hours a day for two weeks at a training camp, along with 170 other students from his school. They practiced firing Kalashnikov assault rifles, using hand grenades and detonating IEDs. Their instructors were operatives from the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades and Hamas’ national security. The boys learned “self defense” and how to “confront the occupation” [i.e., fight Israel]. “Mohammad” said that he supported Hamas and would consider joining the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades.

6. The people in charge of Al-Futuwwa are Mahmoud Syam, general director of educational activities for the Hamas ministry of education, and Lieutenant Colonel Mahmoud al-Nahale, in charge of the program for the ministry of the interior.

In March 2013 Mahmoud Syam visited a number of high schools where the program was being taught, and said that so far it had achieved its aims and that the government also was considering adapting the program for high school girls.

He said that in the future emphasis would be put on a variety of training exercises including the use of weapons and learning skills on the ground (Website of the ministry of the interior of the de-facto Hamas administration, March 31, 2013; Website of the ministry of education of the de-facto Hamas administration, March 20, 2013).

Participation in Operational Activity on the Ground

7. Al-Futuwwa students are integrated into the operational activities of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades to complete their training and theoretical studies.

According to the Hamas forum, on May 3, 2013, 140 Al-Futuwwa students participated in nighttime activities in Gaza along with operatives from the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’ military-terrorist wing. They patrolled and secured junctions and other key points in Gaza City (Hamas forum website, May 3, 2013).

Military Display of Al-Futuwwa Students in a School in Gaza City

8. On April 10, 2013, Al-Futuwwa students held a military display at the Gamal Abdel Nasser school in the Sajaiya quarter in eastern Gaza City. They simulated the attack and takeover of an “IDF post,” the abduction of an “Israeli soldier,” and ended the display by firing anti-tank weapons at the “Israeli post.” They used live ammunition before a large audience. The display was conducted by a Hamas announcer who excited the audience by promising more explosions for “the Zionist enemy.” The display was taped and posted on the GAZA ALAN Facebook page (GAZA ALAN Facebook page, April 10, 2013). It was also posted on YouTube. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R6BSxpl7_0).

Criticism of the Al-Futuwwa Program

9. Samir Zakout, director of the field research unit of the Al-Mezan Center in the Gaza Strip[1],was severely critical of the de-facto Hamas administration for introducing the Al-Futuwwa program into Gaza Strip high schools. He called the program “empty and with no educational content.” He added that the Hamas administration first had to solve more important problems in Palestinian education in the Gaza Strip and provide them with educational values in a different way. He said that Al-Futuwwa was liable to endanger the schools in the Gaza Strip and expose them to attacks by the Israeli Air Force (MBC-TV, Dubai, November 12, 2012).

10. On another occasion, quoted by The Guardian’s correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Samir Zakout said that Hamas had cut sports activities for the past six years, and how had found time to have military training in schools. He added that Hamas was building a “military culture” and creating the next generation of “militants.”

See the Full Document in pdf format.

[1] The Al-Mezan Center is a Palestinian NGO based in the Gaza Strip. Its main office is in the Rimal quarter of Gaza City, and it has branch offices in Jabaliya and Rafah. It is headed by Issam Yunis, who has a Master’s degree in human rights from Essex University in London. The organization plays a prominent role in anti-Israeli lawfare in collaboration with other Palestinian NGOs.


Rest assured, whatever kiddie terror rap is (eventually) pinned on Hamas’s gangsters goes ditto for their PA/Fatah brothers-in-arms, despite their inter-tribal rivalry and occasional warfare. Intrinsically, it was these same “peace” partners who lynched this blogger’s “brothers” in Ramallah, dipping their hands in Jewish blood – http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/lynchwit.html. But if you require a visual aid peer within – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U5-IVKe5QI. And if not for their inextricable link with blood this discussion would be moot – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/ . DOA.

Besides, a PA (terror) state is illegal, even in contravention of international law. And if you require the most expert opinion of all, don’t rely on my word, but do rely on my mentor’s, Professor Louis Rene Beres -(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Ren%C3%A9_Beres

‘Palestinian Statehood, Terror, and the US Election’

Published: October 24th, 2012

“Whenever an insurgent group resorts to openly unjust means, its actions become incontestably terroristic. Even if the ritualistic Palestinian claim of a hostile Israeli “occupation” were somehow reasonable rather than invented, the corresponding right of entitlement to oppose Israel “by any means necessary” would be false.

Significantly, any openly unjust means would remain an obvious expression of terrorism, even if these means were sponsored by a now accepted sovereign state. Alternatively, in these post-independence circumstances, such means could also become a war crime.

Whatever the particular issue at hand, international law always has determinable form and content. Its principles and practices cannot be fashioned and re-fashioned by individual terror groups or by terror-supporting states in order to satisfy certain presumed geo-political interests. This is especially the case wherever terror violence purposely targets evidently fragile and vulnerable civilian populations.

Whatever their cause, national liberation movements that fail to meet the test of just means can never be protected as lawful or legitimate. Even if we could accept the intrinsically spurious argument that Hamas and/or Fatah are somehow able to fulfill the explicit criteria of “national liberation” movements, it would remain perfectly obvious that they still do not meet the recognizable standards of discrimination, proportionality, and military necessity. These authoritative standards of humanitarian international law are made most prominently applicable to insurgent organizations by the common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and also by the two 1977 Protocols to the Conventions.

These core standards are also binding upon all combatants by virtue of broader customary and conventional international law, including Article 1 of the Preamble to the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907. This rule, generally called the “Martens Clause,” makes all persons responsible for upholding the “laws of humanity” and, reciprocally, the “dictates of public conscience.”

Under international law, the ends can never justify the means. As in the case of war between states, every use of force by insurgents must be judged twice, once with regard to the justness of the objective (in this case, a Palestinian state that seeks to be built upon the ruins of a correspondingly dismembered Israel), and once with regard to the justness of the means used toward achieving that annihilatory objective.

In law, murderers of mothers and young children who take an undisguised delight in the blood of their victims can never be “freedom fighters.” Indeed, if ever they should become entitled to such a laudatory designation, we would then have to recalculate the authentic meaning of international law. More precisely, we would have to concede that such law was really nothing more than a quaintly veneered authorization for unhindered evil.

American and European supporters of a Palestinian state continue to presume that Palestine would become an agreeable part of a two-state Solution. For these optimistic believers in “peace,” this 23rd Arab state will gratefully coexist with a still-standing Jewish state. Both U.S. presidential contenders should understand this presumption is plainly contradicted by the undisguised expectations of leading Palestinians, and is regularly dismissed everywhere else in the Arab/Islamic world.

Again, consider cartography. The official Map of Palestine at the PA website continues to include all of Israel. Significantly, there is only one state on this map. As readers may already know, it is not Israel.

The Palestine Liberation Organization was formed in 1964, three years before there were any “occupied territories.” What, exactly, was the PLO attempting to “liberate” between 1964 and 1967? There is no more important or primary question.

In all law, terrorist crimes mandate universal cooperation in both apprehension and punishment. As required punishers of “grave breaches” under a still-decentralized regime of international law, all states are required to search out and prosecute, or to extradite, individual terrorist perpetrators. In absolutely no circumstances are states permitted to characterize terrorists as “freedom fighters.” Any such characterization would reject the fixed obligations of international criminal law.

In absolutely no circumstances are states permitted to support terror violence or war crimes against other states.

This is most emphatically true for the United States, which incorporates all of international law as the “supreme law of the land” in Article 6 of the Constitution, and also in certain Supreme Court decisions. Though almost no one seems to be familiar with such an “arcane” history, this American nation was formed by its Founding Fathers according to the timeless legal principles of Blackstone’s Commentariesand in conformance with antecedent and universal Natural Law.

As Americans, we have a genuine obligation to avoid expressly specious manipulations of international law. Whether in New York, London, or Tel Aviv, “freedom fighters” do not orchestrate their wars against office workers, nursery schools, buses, flower markets, or mothers and their babes in ice-cream parlors.

Until we can finally reconcile this elementary human understanding with jihadist portions of the Middle East, our so-called international community will run the risk of transforming assorted and feuding Palestinian gangs into a UN-supported government.

If this bestowal of sovereignty is allowed to proceed, we could soon expect, however counterintuitive, a continuation or even an enlargement of Palestinian violence. The uncontested fact that any such excursions into violence would now have the blessings and succor of a newly constituted state would in no way diminish the associated criminality.

President Obama and Governor Romney should both take close heed. Jurisprudentially, these destructive acts of a Palestinian state would remain as fully verifiable instances of terrorism, or they would emerge as egregious new violations of the law of war. Either way, there would still be no Palestinian peace with Israel.”


Know this, their non-quenchable barbarism will NOT be forgotten. Nor forgiven. By the way, the lynch in Ramallah was not a one off!