Muslim Brotherhood Mafia (Iran’s Mullahs Alike) OWNS America’s TOP Security Agencies. Is A Purging Too Late? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

in the name of allah

THIS investigative journalist was asked to give a comprehensive analysis on the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood within America and beyond – via an exclusive interview in 2013 – and it was not for nothing. Its findings, sans any doubt, have come to complete fruition.

AS an acknowledged expert on the Brotherhood Mafia’s structural apparatus, as well as its political/ideological/religious underpinnings, the task was to explain to the readership the concomitant relationship between HUSSEIN Obama and the global terror hydra, as well as its blow back upon America and Israel. 

Adina is an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and her previous interview about the expansionist ideology of the organization sent shock waves across the internet.

Adina is an editor of several websites that examine the growing violence in the name of Islam, and she is the creator of a popular Israeli blog. Her insights into the conflict between Israel and the Islamic terrorists of Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority will give our readers an opportunity to find out the truth about the Middle East without the Israel bashing propaganda of the mainstream media….continue here….

EVEN so, and before the embedded links (and others housed within this site) establish how we came from there to here, it is intrinsic to honestly set the record straight. Therefore, despite the fact that it is incontestable that the Brotherhood’s encirclement of America is due to their emplacement within Obama Inc.’s TOP security arms, the fact remains that their entry preceded the Islamist-in-Chief. 

UNARGUABLY – and make no mistake about this – the Brotherhood Mafia’s infiltration dates back to the Presidency of Bill (Bubba) Clinton. Said (largely unknown) tidbit is certainly not news at this end, hmm, that’s an understatement. In fact, at this site’s opening debut, the following was revealed in the summer of 2012: 

While attending a conference in 2007 at Columbia University (aka Bir-Zeit University) under the auspices of SPME (Scholars For Peace In The Middle East), this American-Israeli engaged in a most interesting discussion with a highly connected individual, who shall remain nameless.

Now that Egypt has elected its first Muslim Brotherhood President the above discussion comes full circle and bears telling. The person referred to was (and still is) highly intertwined with NYC Democratic political figures (don’t be so shocked…have friends/contacts from the other side!), and often revealed tidbits which would seem shocking on the face of it, but one way or another proved to be true. There was no reason to believe that this time would be different.

In no uncertain terms it was made known: Hillary Clinton is deeply involved with her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Draw your own conclusions, as to what is meant by “deeply”. The discussion centered around the possibility of another Clinton Presidency, at the time a very real possibility. In any case, the individual was asking me if going public was in the best interests of the United States, in light of Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood ! You read this right. At first blush the thought was that there was a lack of communication between us, but then decided to ask the individual to repeat said charge. Nothing changed.

Apparently, it was weighing heavily on said contact’s mind, that their Senator, quite possibly the next POTUS, was in a position to have deeply divided loyalties. When/where this contact found out such explosive information is neither here nor there. Besides, some matters must remain private. However, readers should know that Huma Abedin has been involved with the Clinton family since Bill Clinton’s first term, having been plucked for the plum assignment, as an intern, for the Clinton White House….continue here

NOW, the relevance of the above is not only about a past Presidency, that’s for sure. However, its basis underlies the Islamist part played by Huma Abedin within Obama’s/Hill’s State Dept, as well as the future part she will play if Hill manages to grab the reins in 2016! A never-ending nightmare. Regardless, it was not as if this site hadn’t warned about this and that on too many occasions to count. Head spinning. Breathtaking.

IN any case, the fact that even top military brass have concluded the same, re the TOTAL infiltration and penetration into America’s defense agencies, well…

Muslim Brotherhood Fighters

IN this regard, this week’s western civilization-shattering and clearly treasonous deal with the Iranian devil is more than emblematic of the above charges. As a matter of written record, tragically, the following was asserted in Nov. 2013 and it has – as predicted at this site – come full circle.

CONTRARY to popular opinion and self deception within the U.S. and Israel – that the POTUS is way out of his depth, therefore, he does not know what he is doing – such an assumption is entirely erroneous and misleading. Dangerously so.     Barack HUSSEIN Obama is seeking an arms race in the Mid East, even as he disarms the U.S. and fails to protect against an eventual EMP/WMD attack. In league with the Islamist-in-Chief’s continuous treachery toward America’s interests, his goal is to box Israel into (eventual) oblivion. Whenever it comes to pass, he will take satisfaction/pride that he had a hand in it. That’s the damnable truth.Just consider what has transpired up until this world class game changer: for all intents and purposes (barring an IMMEDIATE bolt out of the blue Israeli strike, but hardly likely at this point due to Netanyahu’s hot air blustering and gutless failure to pull the trigger) Iran has joined the “nuclear club”, even though official “negotiations” are hardly on the table. The following was noted 2 weeks ago: Iran is heading down to the trip wireCouldn’t be clearer.Coupled with this stark analysis – no pussyfooting around – and to shore up the opening thesis, the leader of the free world is aiming/arming for America’s and Israel’s downfall. His proxy forces are readying to execute his dirty work.

NOT only that, but less than a month ago, 2 weeks before the above warnings, this blog “predicted” Iran’s triumph, as Barack HUSSEIN Obama subsumed the free world’s interests to Islamist revolutionaries. Regardless of this American-Israeli’s desire to have been proven wrong, we are where we are….continue reading

INDICTMENT sealed; against the Islamist/Traitor-in-Chief and his surrogates in toto. Muslim soldiers for Allah – be they Sunni or Shia – within America and throughout the Islamist world have the west by the throat. Their mission – via a destructive swathe across the globe – is (almost) a fait accompli.

ALL ‘credit’ should be assigned (punishment alike, whatever it takes) to HUSSEIN Obama for wielding America’s (the west’s) burial forceps in the lead up to WW 3! 


It has never been this American-Israeli’s intention to denigrate U.S. or Israeli leadership. Far from it. But chips fall where they do and it is not a patriot’s (especially if one is both a committed Zionist and a Conservative American…a double whammy) obligation to cover up a leadership’s faults, or, in some cases, their treachery. Rather, it is incumbent upon all of us to reveal whatever shakes out of various trees and that is that. 

So, on the U.S. front, this blog has consistently, unflinchingly indicted the anti-American Islamist-in-Chief for his betrayals. It is summed up within concomitant commentaries, yet the most recent ones demonstrate where we are during this grave historical juncture in time, one which will forever change/tip the balance of power. No exaggeration. Sugarcoating it won’t change the horrific facts on the ground. They include, but not exclusively so:

OBAMA’S SELL OUT TO IRAN: ITS KEY INTERSECTION WITH THE RED/GREEN ALLIANCE. BOXING IN ISRAEL CORE bespeaks of ill intent from the get go. None of what is playing out before the world’s horrified eyes is the result of a POTUS who is out of his league, stumbling hither and yon. To those who tsk, tsk otherwise, perhaps this tidbit will change your minds: Report: Obama Arranging Tehran Visit for Next YearWell, whaddaya know…the leader of the heretofore free world is planning on paying homage to the leadership of the world’s BIGGEST sponsor of global terror, bar none – as terror-ridden as the Saudis are!

Consequentially, how could it be possible, from the actions referenced above, that Iran would not be elevated to a world power status? Predictably, cause and effect – BREAKING: ADDITIONAL TREACHERY FROM BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’s “DEAL”; IRAN ELEVATED To WORLD POWER STATUS ! Western Civilization At Stake.

YET, no one should be clueless enough to believe, alongside all of Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s treachery,VALERIE JARRETT: Iran’s “Deal Maker”, Her Main Mission As Obama’s Consigliere. Western Civilization’s Hit Womanwasn’t center stage.

But despite his smarts he is spineless to the core, at least in his ability to make tough political decisions. This is not a personal assessment, but one which is shared by more than a few esteemed associates, having interfaced with PM Netanyahu in this and that.
That being said, internalize how we came from there to here due to Israel’s derelict leadership: 

PM Netanyahu’s SPINELESS Leadership Assists Iran’s WMD (More Than Likely) Victory.

DEBKAfile Special Report December 2, 2013
Binyamin Netanyahu's nuclear depiction caricatured

Binyamin Netanyahu’s nuclear depiction caricatured

The former heads of two of the most powerful intelligence agencies in the world, speaking Sunday, Dec. 1, in different parts of the world, were of the same opinion: Iran has reached the point of a nuclear threshold state and can build several nuclear bombs in a matter of weeks. By this diagnosis, Gen. Michael Hayden, former director of the CIA and NSA, and ex-general Amos Yadlin, ex-chief of AMAN, Israeli military intelligence indicted their respective governments of the US and Israeli for their failure to stop this happening.
Asked in a FoxNews interview in New York about the interim accord the six powers reached with Iran in Geneva, Gen. Hayden was terse: “Iran is a nuclear threshold nation and we can’t stop this,” he said. America has moved its red lines and “all but conceded Iran has the right to enrich uranium.” He went on to voice the hope that “We have hit the pause button. Now we’ve got to negotiate hitting the delete button.”

Yadlin, who heads a national security think tank, had this to say: “Iran is approaching breakout point to a nuclear bomb.” On the Geneva accord, he commented: “… this is only a first step, not a final agreement, although it contains elements which predetermine the final accord.”

Speaking in Tel Aviv, Yadlin said: “The fact that Iran is a nuclear threshold state is not the fault of this agreement. Iran spent many years developing this capability and no one managed to stop it. Iran is a step before breakout to a bomb.  This is unfortunate but true.”

It was the first time that a former high-ranking Israeli intelligence officer had admitted the responsibility of successive Israeli governments, defense ministers and heads of its various intelligence agencies for the failure to pre-empt Iran’s drive for a nuclear weapon.
MK Tzahi Hanegbi , a senior lawmaker who has the ear of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, expressed concern that the interim deal with Iran would be left standing as the final accord, and so leave the Islamic Republic in place as a nuclear threshold state with the capability to assemble a bomb within six to seven weeks.
In Rome, Netanyahu was heard to say for the umpteenth time that Israel would not allow Iran to attain a nuclear bomb. He seemed to have forgotten the diagram he exhibited to the UN General Assembly in September 2012 accompanied by a resounding pledge not to let Iran accumulate enough enriched uranium for a weapon.

Hanegbi, in his comments Sunday, put the record straight: Iran has built a uranium stockpile of 7.2 tons, enough for several bombs.”

Former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, after criticizing his successor for daring to argue with US President Obama, was of the opinion that Israel would not attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. He was saying that Israel has decided to accept a nuclear-armed Iran.

It is absolutely true that past officials often have personal and professional axes to grind, therefore, they may purposefully state things which are meant to exact revenge but are skewed with inaccuracies. Nevertheless, in this instance, it is not the case. 

YES, Iran’s genocidal mullahs have gotten what they want. Not only a “kosher” stamp of approval from the U.S., that they have the “legitimate” right to nuclear ambitions, but Professor Louis Rene Beres, (a world expert on nuclear warfare) posited their threshold leap at a major Oxford University publication a year ago!

YET, aside from Israel’s and Washington’s leadership (and to a lesser degree of accuracy, Europe’s) they knew when Iran’s nuclear ship “crossed the threshold”, but for totally different reasons they kept playing out the charade that there was “still time”. And this is why certain commentaries alluded to a “bolt out of the blue” scenario, hoping there was still a possibility that Jerusalem would execute what they are charged to do – save the Jewish nation! But the dominoes keep lining up, and the west’s outcome is delineated below. 

Israel’s Pre-emptive Window, Re Iran, Has (Precipitously) Closed: Professor Louis Rene Beres Expounds

For well over a decade there has been no other contact (in the entire world) whose assessment was more valued, regarding Iran’s WMD program, thanProfessor Louis Rene Beres. So much so, he is given all due credit and respect at the ‘About’ tab –

As such, his strategic nuclear assessments have been front and center at this blog. They must be given maximum deliberation. The following, at Oxford U’s Press, highlighted the legal basis for pre-emption. Take note of its date, November 15, 2012, almost 5 months ago. Meaning, while Jerusalem wasted precious nation-saving time, hitching Israel’s completely lawful, anticipatory self defense to Washington’s dictates, the option of pre-emption has evaporated. This VERY short window, a mere 5 months ago, is no longer open – every week lost is Iran’s gain, as its genocidal regime brings them to the “finish line”.

Catch your breath and read on…back in September 2012 a similar warning was blared from these pages, courtesy of Professor Louis Rene Beres…how many dead horses does one blog have to beat, figuratively-speaking – 

In this regard, Ariel Sharon, Israel’s ex PM, received this report fromProject Daniel, and Professor Louis Rene Beres was its Chair. It was dated January 16, 2003. ( commentary is linked herein – So when reading the latest op-ed at Israel National News, bear in mind Prof Beres’s 2003 report to PM Sharon. But do take the time to read his updated nuclear strategic assessment re Project Daniel – …heady material! Please place his name in their search engine and his articles will pop up, or use this link

‘Op-Ed: Israel’s Increasingly Complex Nuclear Imperatives, Pt I’ – Israel National News, April 2, 2013

Though the logic of deterrence has always rested upon an assumption of rationality, history reveals the persistent fragility of any such understanding.

Prof. Louis René Beres

Over these many years, beginning at Princeton in the late 1960s, I have examined core bases of Israeli nuclear deterrence. Recently, in consequence of the still-growing threat of Iranian nuclearization, increasing attention has been directed toward pertinent issues of enemy rationality. With such issues in mind, this essay will seek to explain (1) the likely impact of enemy “irrationality” on Israel’s deterrence posture; and (2) the vital differences between prospective Iranian irrationality, and genuine enemy “madness.”

For states in world politics, at least according to the generally unchallenged conventional wisdom, successful strategies of deterrence must correctly assume enemy rationality. In the absence of such rationality – that is, in those relatively rare or residual circumstances where an enemy country might rank order certain values or preferences more highly than “staying alive” as a nation – deterrence could simply not work. Moreover, in those potentially much more serious situations involving nuclear deterrence, the direct consequences of any such failure could be stark, catastrophic, and even unprecedented.

Significantly, at least in world politics, irrationality is never the same as “madness.” To wit, an irrational enemy leadership could still maintain a distinct and identifiable hierarchy of preferences, but one in which national survival would not necessarily rank at the top. In more technical terms, strategic analysts would say here that these irrational state actors still maintain an order of preferences that is both “consistent” and “transitive.”

A “mad” leadership, on the other hand, would have no discernible order of preferences. Its actions, for the most part, would be random and unpredictable. It goes without saying that facing a “mad” adversary in world politics is “worse” than facing a “merely” irrationaladversary. Expressed in somewhat different terms, although it might still be possible and purposeful to try to deter an irrational enemy, there would be little point to seeking deterrence against a plainly “mad” one.

“Do you know what it means to find yourselves face to face with a madman,” asks playwright Luigi Pirandello’s Henry IV. “Madmen, lucky folk, construct without logic, or rather with a logic that flies like a feather.”

Credo quia absurdum. “I believe because it is absurd.” What is true for individuals is sometimes also true for states.

In the often-unpredictable theatre of modern world politics, a drama that so often bristles with apparent meaninglessness, decisions that rest upon ordinary logic may quickly crumble before madness. Here, dangers can reach even the most utterly portentous level. This is the aptly-dreaded point of convergence, when madness and nuclear weapons capability would coincide, fuse, or otherwise come together.

Enter Israel and Iran. Soon, because not a single responsible member of the “international community” has ever demonstrated a determinable willingness to undertake appropriately preemptive action (“anticipatory self-defense,” in the formal language of law), the Jewish State may have to face an expressly genocidal Iranian nuclear adversary. Although improbable, a potentially “suicidal” enemy state in Iran, one animated by graphically precise visions of a Shiite apocalypse, cannot be wished away, or, capriciously, dismissed out of hand.

Iran’s current leadership, and possibly even a successor “reformist” government in Tehran, could, at some point, choose to value Israel’s physical destruction more highly than even its own physical survival. Should this happen, the “play” would almost certainly end badly for all “actors.” In recognizably theatrical terms, the “director’s” command would be both unambiguous and immobilizing.

Exeunt omnes!

Nonetheless, despite U.S. President Barack Obama’s disingenuous hope for “a world free of nuclear weapons,” Israel’s ultimate source of national security must inevitably lie in sustained nuclear deterrence. Although still implicit or ambiguous, and not yet open, or disclosed, this Israeli “bomb in the basement” could readily “crumble before madness.” In certain easily-imaginable instances, circumstances involving enemy “madness,” the results of failed Israeli retaliatory threats could ultimately be existential.

Though the logic of deterrence has always rested upon an assumption of rationality, history reveals the persistent fragility of any such understanding. We already know all too well that nations can sometimes behave in ways that are consciously, or even conspicuously, self-destructive.

Sometimes, mirroring the infrequent but decisively unpredictable behavior of individual human beings, national leaders can choose to assign the very highest value to certain preferences other than collective self-preservation. In operatic metaphor, this could reveal a Gotterdammerung (“Twilight of the Gods”) scenario.

For the moment, no single Arab or Iranian adversary of Israel would appear to be authentically irrational or mad. Harsh enemy rhetoric notwithstanding, no current Israeli adversary appears ready to launch a major first-strike against Israel using weapons of mass destruction, with the expectation that it would thereby elicit a devastating reprisal. Of course, miscalculations and errors in information could still lead a perfectly rational enemy state to strike first, but this decision, by definition, would not be the outcome of irrationality or madness.

In strategic thinking, judgments of rationality and irrationality are always based upon prior intent.

Certain enemy states, most likely Iran, could one day decide that excising the “Jewish cancer” or the “enemies of Allah,” from the Middle East would somehow be worth even the most palpably staggering costs. In principle, at least, this particular genocidal prospect could be avoided by Israel’s adoption of pertinent “hard target” preemptions. Increasingly, however, any such once-reasonable expressions of anticipatory self-defense are now difficult or impossible to imagine. Operationally, in essence, a successful preemption is now almost certainly infeasible.

Now, most or all critical Iranian nuclear assets have likely been deeply hardened, widely dispersed, and substantially multiplied. For Israel, expectedly, there would also be considerable political costs to any preemption. To be sure, a preemptive attack, even one that could become an operational failure, would elicit overwhelming public and diplomatic condemnation.

It is plausible that undertaking certain alternative forms of preemption, including assassination of nuclear scientists, and/or cyber defense/cyber-warfare, could (still) be purposeful, but it is unlikely that any such alternatives could permanently obviate traditionally more expedient resorts to military force. (to be continued).

LOUIS RENÉ BERES is Professor of Political Science and International Law at PurdueUniversity. Educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), he is the author of ten books and several hundred published articles dealing with Israeli security matters, including APOCALYPSE: NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE IN WORLD POLITICS (University of Chicago Press, 1980), and SECURITY OR ARMAGEDDON: ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR STRATEGY(Heath/Lexington Books, 1986). Professor Beres served as Chair of Project Daniel, a private effort (2003) to counsel former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on existential nuclear threats to Israel. In March 2013, Dr. Beres presented another major Working Paper to the annual Herzliya Conference on Israeli strategy. Professor Beres was born inZürichSwitzerland, on August 31, 1945.

Part’s 2 & 3 herein –

Learning from a master should allow one to think more clearly, at least one hopes so. This is why the following was written on December 28, 2012, re PM Netanyahu’s cartoonish “red line”–…with the full understanding that it was vanishing, to the point of no return.

Due to all of the above, by the start of the 2013 it was obvious that PM Netanyahu trampled on his own “red line”. No one is suggesting, least of all this blogger, that this is what he intended. But in matters of grave (quite possibly existential) import, good intentions are as viable as prevailing winds. Worthless.

Therefore, it is with great sadness, trepidation and complete outrage, that Israelis (and others) await the grim news – Jerusalem will “learn” to “contain” Iran! Indeed, Israel’s “bombs in the basement” will have to surface. And this is a direct result of western abdication, as well as Israel’s lack of statesmanship. Cause and effect.

MADNESS….שגעון !!

Most significantly, IRAN, FOR ALL INTENTS & PURPOSES, A NUCLEAR POWER: Obama’s LONGSTANDING Quest To Arm Iran. The Jig Is Up! What’s Obama’s End Goal?