Monthly Archives: March 2014

OBAMA INC’s “WEAPONIZED” CYBER WARRIORS:GOEBBEL’S-LIKE DISINFORMATION DEPLOYED/AIMED AT AMERICAN CITIZENS. CONSERVATIVE SITES PRIME TARGETS! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
2

 “Send it by carrier pigeon.”

bushnsacartoon.jpg

WHATEVER one surmises about Edward Snowden’s true motives in revealing NSA’s all encompassing domestic spying (in tandem with their full throat-ed spying on friendly countries) apparatus, the fact of the matter is that he alerted American citizens to the totalitarian bent of Obama Inc.

To be sure, it was not as if citizens hadn’t been aware of increasing levels of spying, particularly in relation to internal domestic monitoring. Hell, this blog wrote about Obama Inc.’s Nazi-like tactics, well before Snowden burst onto the scene. However, the scope of the spying was unknown, as well as which group fared better than most. Orwellian.

For the record, Muslim Americans are off limits from unfettered spying, so ordered by the Islamist-in-Chief! NSA’S MONSTROUS LIE DECODED:INVASION OF PRIVACY (DECEITFULLY) PREDICATED ON “WAR ON TERROR” reveals Obama Inc.’s treachery!

But never mind, Obama’s Mafia is the most anti-American regime in the nation’s history, therefore, to expect patriotic ethos is to whistle past its graveyard. Absolutely.

Even so, what else is going on to warrant an updated shout out, other than the overall understanding that the regime in Washington is running wild? And, who in their right mind – no pun intended – will be shocked, shocked to find out that PAID propagandists and spies are infiltrating Conservative websites via orders of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, and remunerated for their efforts through the taxpayer trough?

Global Ministries of Disinformation confirmed

Northeast Intelligence Network

By Douglas J. Hagmann

28 February 2014: It was a year ago this month that I reported information revealed by my source within the Department of Homeland Security about the existence of “cyber warriors” working for the regime of Barack Hussein Obama. The initial report was published on 6 February 2013 titled DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber warriors & preparing for collapse and detailed, according to this source, government operatives working on behalf of Obama. According to this source, paid operatives began targeting websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts at exactly 7:00 a.m. on January 23, [2013] under an operation called “the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project.” That report, which was met with a firestorm of skepticism despite the level of detail provided, noted the activation of government shills infiltrating and attacking “problem” web sites and forums, particularly Christian, conservative, “birther” and other similar sites. In one particularly disturbing characterization ostensibly included for motivational purposes, Obama was referred to as the “Pharaoh of the internet.”

Now, over a year later, documents leaked by Edward Snowden and reported by Glenn Greenwald provide hard evidence that “Western governments” are indeed engaged in such activity. In his report dated 24 February 2014, Mr. Greenwald discloses the role of GCHQ, or Government Communication Headquarters based in the UK, from top secret, classified government documents. These documents describe the methods employed by Western intelligence agencies to “manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction.”  In his revealing report based on the Snowden disclosures, Mr. Greenwald explains that the targets of such marginalization are not at the nation-state level, but those who post material online that is contrary to the political interests and agendas of government.

While the revelations focus on the tactics of the UK based GCHQ, it is important to understand that intelligence between the UK and the U.S. is commonly shared to circumvent the laws that restrict U.S. intelligence agencies such as the CIA from operating domestically. The recently released authenticated documentation leaked by Snowden outlines very disturbing and controversial techniques to disseminate deception online, exactly as detailed in my report from a year ago.

These recent revelations should provide a level of verification that this activity is not merely restricted to GCHQ, but also involves a “virtual army” deployed domestically for the advancement of certain political agendas. The objectives are as numerous as they are nefarious. As the classified documents outline, government operatives are systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse.” The larger agenda is to control free speech online and to ultimately destroy any political dissent by vilifying the messengers and nullifying their messages in an Orwellian fashion.

The recent verifications that paid government operatives are actively working to provide cover to the unlawful activities of the criminal elements within rogue governments as well as the globalists should concern everyone, if not cause righteous outrage. Not only are we are being lied to about the most serious issues, past and present, but those of us who are engaged in reporting the truth are the targets of a very sophisticated, highly organized, government backed campaign of nullification and vilification.

Is it any wonder, then, why the issue of the background and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has been such a magnet for marginalization? What about the numerous “conspiracy theories” that seem to attract the most aggressive and vocal opponents when various topics are presented for intellectual discussion?

We are engaged in an information war. The truth and those who seek it exist on one side. Those who want to bury the truth, or those who are otherwise known as paid operatives employed by the intelligence communities of various Western countries, exist on the other side. The globalists have already captured and control the corporate media. Today, the battle is being waged on the internet, just as I reported one year ago this month.

Perhaps now, a year after my report, people will begin to understand the monstrous scope of the battle in which we are engaged, and the enormity of the lies that are being thrust upon us. The battle transcends any adherence to partisan politics, as it involves the common theme of a global agenda to which each party is beholden.

Alas, since this site’s inception, a little over a year and a half ago, a constant stream of Obama’s zombies have been on a tear. Without fail, whenever a hot button issue surfaces – particularly when shining a spotlight on The One’s eligibility, gun control, DHS or their general penchant for totalitarian rule, a slew of “facts” appear at my wordpress via the comments section. 

Granted, there are many radical leftists pissed off at this blog’s unabashed Conservative AND Zionist (right wing) ethos, therefore, some may very well be venting on their own. Nevertheless, when a CLEAR pattern emerges – you can set your clock to it – and certain missives reek of the very same talking points, well, someone in charge is bent out of shape over the contents herein.

This site is being watched. NO doubt about it. Let them spit and spin. But all their propaganda tactics will only serve to strengthen the message within, demonstrating just how intrinsic it is to throw their yoke off America’s (and Israel’s) back!

Without a doubt, patriots can only be pushed so far. Obama’s goons would do well to look towards Egypt, to realize that the fate of the Brotherhood Mafia – as they attempted to strangle the people via totalitarian dictates – will be their own, if they do not cease and desist. In fact, they may have to turn in their designer suits for prison garb. Stranger things have happened.

AG HOLDER SUPPLANTS U.S. LAW:IMPOSES SHARIAH LAW BY SILENCING CRITICISM OF ISLAM & MORE!(GRAPHIC IMAGE) Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
29

WARNING: Disturbing image below…”courtesy” of Shariah Law…

 IMAGEThis blogger unreservedly apologizes in advance for its graphic contents, but it is what it is.The following video was uploaded on the YouTube channel of  Jihadis. Mind you, Obama Inc. sees NO conflict between Shariah Law and its “integration” within America’s Constitutional system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHTsrraXYGc

In this regard, Shariah Law mandates that ANY criticism of Islam is verboten. In fact, a fatwa is placed upon the “offender’s” head, if caught, death is the outcome. Amputation of limbs is “reserved” for “lesser” crimes.

Most recently, the spread of Shariah Law to the first Southeast Asian nation, Brunei, at the national level entails: under the new law, an adulterer could be stoned to death, a thief could face a severed limb, drinking alcohol could lead to flogging and so on….

Granted, as is said, there is more than one way to skin a cat, and this is precisely apropos herein. Say what?!

Even Barack HUSSEIN Obama – and his band of Shariah Law proponents – understands that America is not Brunei, nor is it Saudi Arabia – yet. Though he behaves like a Potentate-in-Chief, as he willy nilly disregards the rule of law, there are still certain matters which must be implemented stealthily. Indeed.

Thus, this renegade regime gleefully realizes, yes, they have a free hand to enact dictates designed to effectuate the bringing down of “Amerika”, but they must first implant varying underpinnings. They also understand that many Americans are barely paying attention to anything which distracts them from the latest Kardashian escapade, or some such blah, blah escapism. Nevertheless, the other half of the population is, for the most part, paying heed. Therefore, a multiplicity of tactics are employed to set the stage for one form of anti-American edict after another, whether socialist or Islamist derived. Whatever gets the job done.

To wit, their most effective weapon is one which will distance any taint of jihadi terror from Muslim-Americans and from Muslims in toto. Really, it’s like separating pigs from their shit. Can you imagine?   

Now, this is not to say that all (even though a disproportionately large percentage are “silent” accomplices) Muslims engage in terror, but it is absolutely the case – like it or not – that their religious/political doctrine underpins jihad and mandates its war-like implementation. Anyone who babbles otherwise is either an ignorant dolt or downright lying. Pick your poison.

Consider:  

The contents found within “Islam and Blood” offers irrefutable and underlying evidence, elucidating the otherwise unfathomable barbarism originating within Islam: https://adinakutnicki.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf

So, in light of all the above, how dangerous, treacherous and otherwise dastardly is it for America’s AG to dictate the following omerta, and over a period of several years?

First-Class Islam: Eric Holder Puts Muslims Above Terror Suspicion

No more instruction about jihad, and Islam is to be considered a race.
From 2008 to 2011, I was a guest lecturer at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (the primary DHS training facility, located in coastal Georgia) and at Joint Special Operations University (which brings foreign officers to learn of U.S. irregular warfare, located in Tampa). At both venues I was asked to lecture on the history of terrorism.

I did so in an even-handed and comprehensive manner, exploring the issue across place (Europe to East Asia), time (ancient Assyria to al-Qaeda), and ideology (religious: pagan, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Muslim; and political: right-wing, left-wing, anarchist, environmentalist, etc.). Only 14 of the 44 PowerPoint screens in my presentation dealt with Islamic terrorism, although several of those actually mitigated against the concept.

JSOU continued to utilize me until late 2011, when I was told by the course instructor that Muslim student officers had complained that “I talked too much about Islamic terrorism.”

I was actually surprised that I had not been yanked the year before,when references to Islam and jihad were stricken from Obama’s kinder, gentler National Security Strategy document. That same year, noted Islamic studies expert Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that foiled Islamic suicide bombers in the U.S. were motivated by “Islam that is not consistent with” that religion’s “true teachings.”

Now, the Obama administration — led by Holder — has decided that Islam is a “race,” and therefore to examine or even to adduce a Muslim’s Islamic beliefs about jihad, beheading, violence against kuffar (“infidels”), or re-establishing a caliphate is tantamount to racism. This administration behavior is rationalized because “federal authorities have in particular singled out Muslims in counter terrorism investigations and Latinos for immigration investigations.”

It is difficult to express just how willfully ignorant of reality these statements and accompanying policies are.

Per the immigration example: as over 80% of “undocumented aliens” are from Mexico or another Latin American country, it would be foolish, indeed delusionary, to ignore that fact. The same logic applies to directing extra scrutiny towards individuals who hold a set of beliefs that may predispose them to violence against others not of that belief system.

And that is the primary point: Islam is a belief system. Not a race.

Muslims can be of any skin, Bosnian or Turkish, Nigerian, Saudi, Chinese. If American, Muslims can perhaps be of several nationalities. This is equally if not more true of Christians, who can be white Finns, black Ethiopians, brown Lebanese, or Koreans, to name but a few examples. It is not possible to look at someone (sans distinctive clothing) and ascertain whether he or she is Muslim or Christian — or secularist, for that matter.

Advocacy groups and willing dupes in the media and Democrat Party — like Senator Dick Durbin — have foolishly yet successfully conflated race and ideology in the case of only one religion, Islam. They have made examining the latter tantamount to discrimination against the former.  No one ever argues that singling out Christians for repression because they hold politically incorrect views about gay marriage or abortion amounts to “racism.”

Beyond the obvious fact that beliefs do not constitute a race, Holder et al. are massively wrong to deny the clear link between certain Islamic beliefs and terrorism.

NOT unlike waving a white flag of surrender to America’s Constitutional Republic, Obama’s regime is putting forth a red carpet to Islamic adherents, an open sesame of sorts. So much so that even those who engage in material support for terrorism are sailing through the immigration process: OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

Along this line of anti-American behavior it is imperative for Holder’s DOJ to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws in the USA, almost as a twin bookend to placing Muslim-Americans (and Muslims in general) above any terror suspicion!

Never mind that the amount of arrests (what about the ones who haven’t been caught?) related to terror plots within America disproportionately involve Muslims, Obama Inc. offers them carte blanche to continue their jihadi handiwork!

“On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/marching-muslims-now-say-they-oppose-fear/#93ImcPpsY1b7qQUE.99

ACT for America founder Brigitte Gabriel blasted the organization.

“It is amazing how fast they changed the original language on their website claiming victimhood, bigotry, and unfair treatment since Sept. 11th 2001,” Gabriel said. “Once they were confronted and debated by people like me who pointed out to them that in the last four years alone we have arrested on American soil 226 home grown terrorists. One-hundred eighty six of them were Muslims. Not Jews. Not Hindus, not Buddhist. But Muslims”

Gabriel says the facts are that Muslim immigrants to the U. S. are responsible for a disproportionally large number of domestic terrorism cases.

“Of all immigrants who have ever immigrated to America since its birth, America never encountered such hatred and terrorism coming out of one faith based group in our country that accounts for less than 2 percent of the American population and is now responsible for over 80 percent of attacks against America,” she said.

“In 11 years since 9/11, the Islamic American community has not organized a one million man march to condemn Islamic terrorism against America and call Hamas, al-Qaida, Hezbollah, al-Shabaab, and other groups by their names – terrorists,” Gabriel said.

AGAIN, why are Muslims “off limits” – by the gang ruling Washington – in relation to explaining the genesis of jihad and its Islamic origins??

Rhetorical question. Abhorrent. Treacherous. Treasonous.

MAJOR U.S. GRAIN CO. (BLUMBERG) FINANCIALLY IN BED WITH BROTHERHOOD MAFIA: COZY CONGRESSIONAL REPS LEND COVER…Commentary by Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
Reply
Khairat al-Shater. Muslim Brotherhood's number two deputy in Egypt.

Khairat al-Shater. Muslim Brotherhood’s number two deputy in Egypt.

Too many American businesses – other western countries too – are financially in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. This is a fact. They can shuck and jive all they want and feign they are “just” conducting business where their services/products are needed, but any dealings with Muslim Brotherhood leaders bloodies their hands as well. NO doubt whatsoever.

To be sure, it is easy enough for greedy business types – sans ANY moral compass – to assert: well, the leadership of the free world plays footsie with these same players, so what’s the big deal. And – they would be right!

But as most parents admonish – at least they should – two wrongs don’t make a right. Besides, following any leader blindly will lead to ruin, sooner or later. 

In this regard, rational business leaders and politicians can’t claim that their dealings with Muslim Brotherhood operatives aren’t propping up this and that level of jihad. It defies credulity. In any case, the concept of due diligence is a well known and mandated business practice. It is also the sworn duty of national leaders to be equally diligent.

And if Blumberg Grain et al. requires requisite lessons, this site is more than willing to teach them right from wrong. Free of charge. No recompense warranted. See, that’s not so hard.

Lesson One:

This blog has duly revealed the terror facts at hand, therefore, any denial is a river of bull shi-t: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM ‘THE PLAN’, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO!

Lesson Two:

But if anyone is silly enough to believe that Obama Inc.’s governmental organs are gonna step up and conduct their sworn due diligence…pigs fly too: DHS & (Not So) Stealth Jihad: Obama Inc. PROMOTES Muslim Brotherhood Mafia Infiltrator.What Are The Ramifications? 

Lesson Number Three:

Aside from DHS, take a peek at Hagel’s Islamic-oriented Pentagon: The Pentagon’s/POTUS’s Collusion With The Muslim Brotherhood Mafia: Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Islamic Thrust!

IF it looks like a terror duck…business-wise or Rep-wise…

Leaked Secret Emails Reveal Plan To Send $750 Million To Muslim Brotherhood

by  on February 24, 2014

Leaked secret emails published by Arabic sources reveal a $750 million deal between a major U.S. Company that provides crop preservation technology and the Muslim Brotherhood is raising a stink in Egypt when secret emails between Blumberg Grain and the top officials in the Muslim Brotherhood was released by Al-Watan Egyptian news.

The ordeal raises an eyebrow on how business is conducted between a private U.S. company and the notorious organization that was the mother of Al-Qaeda and Hamas.

In one email sent by David Blumberg, Blumberg Grain’s CEO for West Africa, to Ezz Nasser, an apparent intermediary for a top Muslim Brotherhood deputy, Blumberg makes reference to $750 Million in U.S. aid and a letter penned by two U.S. Congressmen – Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Ted Deutch (D-FL) to use as leverage to persuade Khayrat Al-Shater, the senior Muslim Brotherhood leader that such letters would help in releasing the 750 million to the Muslim Brotherhood’s administration.

So unusual was the nature of this communication that there was no reference to a Department of Agriculture or any government ministry official as one sees the norm in such business dealings. TheMinister of Agriculture at the time was Sala Abdel-Mo’men and not Khayrat Al-Shater. Astonished, we suspected foul-play that the nature of such secret emails could be fraudulent we asked Blumberg for a comment and shockingly, they did not deny the authenticity or contents of the emails but simply denounced al-Watan’s conclusions. In the emails, Blumberg referenced Diaz-Balart as being on the committee that is “holding back” the $750 Million (email screenshots at bottom of this post) and that the letter secured by Blumberg from the Congressmen should sweeten the deal now that hundreds of millions could be released by the U.S. Government.

A Deal between Blumberg Grain and the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt was not consummated, however based on the evidence it clearly raises questions on ethical standards in which a private company using the leverage or inference to “hold up aid” agreed to by the US Congress to push favor over one company over another based on “friendships” with congressmen.

In his exchanges with the Muslim Brotherhood (see emails with Nasser at bottom of this post), Blumberg attempts to highlight the significance of the Congressional letter because it came from both a Democrat and a Republican. Our request to see the letter written by Diaz-Balart and Deutch went unanswered.

The willingness to deal with al-Shater by a top U.S. Grain company is alarming for additional reasons. Didn’t Blumberg know that in 2012, al-Shater was disqualified for running for President because he had too recently been convicted of criminal activity. In 2008, al-Shater wassentenced to seven years in prison for money laundering.

At the time, Ahram Online reported that al-Shater had been in prison five different times (his current visit constitutes number six).

As for money laundering, al-Shater’s 2008 conviction wasn’t the first time he’d been charged:

In 1992, El-Shater was arrested and accused of money laundering in the case better known as “Salsabeel”, the name of a computer information systems company which he founded together with Brotherhood member Hassan Malek.

Though no investigations or allegations has been raised against Blumberg Grain, any decision to deal with the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Shater is one that should raise ethical and judgmental concerns.

Philip Blumberg

Philip Blumberg

The email sent El-Ajyal, by Philip Blumberg, chairman and CEO of Blumberg Captial Partners group to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Khairat Al-Shater on August 14, 2012 was just weeks after the Muslim Brotherhood had assumed power in Egypt has alarming quotes:

El-Ajyal

“Egypt is an important market for the company, but choosing the right local partner is very important. I understand that you [al-Shater] are interested in performing this role, and we are excited to see your interest in the matter.”

All this while al-Shater was not even listed as a member of the Egyptian government during the Muslim Brotherhood’s regime. In matters relating to hundreds of millions of dollars going to Egypt, why would a man who had been convicted of money laundering and who was not part of the government be involved at all?

As the Brotherhood’s Deputy Supreme Guide at the time, al-Shater was an extremely important power broker for the Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt. While he may not have been an official member of the government, he clearly had political sway. The letter further indicates that al-Shater would have exclusive rights to use the technology produced by the company, to include participation in Blumberg’s projects in Turkey and Libya.

In March of 2013, the elder Blumberg granted an interview to Business Today. In it, he discussed his company’s plans to invest in Egypt, which was to include a “manufacturing plant and export hub” that “will employ 1,000 Egyptians” with a goal of increasing Egyptian exports by “$6 billion”.

Philip referred to “kick-starting Egypt’s economy with economic development projects” and working with “Egyptian leadership” without making reference to that leadership’s makeup – the Muslim Brotherhood. At this point in time, several of the group’s leaders are in prison and facing trial. It is expected that these email exchanges with Blumberg to be used in the trial of Mohammed Mursi and Khayrat Al-Shater.

In fact, al-Shater is one figure that the Obama administration seemed to take great interest in after the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood regime on July 3, 2013. Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns visited Egypt in August of that year and met with the jailed al-Shater for ninety minutes, despite an attempt by al-Shater’s Chief of Staff – Gehad el-Haddad – to diminish both the significance and duration of that meeting.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, el-Haddad was once employed by the Clinton Foundation for five years.

In another series of emails reported on by El-Ajyal as well as by El-Watan, David Blumberg is shown to be communicating with Nasser.

David Blumberg

David Blumberg

In the emails, Nasser is identified as the Country Manager for Velosi Egypt and Velosi Syria. ASaudi Arabian document that lists the ‘Worldwide Offices’ of Velosi Companies also identifies Nasser as the Egyptian representative:

Ezz Nasser: Point man for Velosi Egypt.

Ezz Nasser: Point man for Velosi Egypt.

In one email string, from May of last year, David Blumberg attempts to broker a meeting between his father, Philip Blumberg, other staff members, and al-Shater.

In this email, the younger Blumberg makes reference to “$750 Million” in foreign aid to Egypt as well as a Congressional letter penned by Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) in his capacity as a member of the House Appropriations Committee, chaired by Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Rep.

Ted Deutch (D-FL), in his capacity as a member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

[Point of clarification: The younger Blumberg erroneously identified Deutch as the ‘ranking Democrat’ on the ‘House Foreign Relations Committee’. First, ‘ranking’ member refers to the leader of the minority party on any committee. The ranking Democrat of the House Foreign Affairs Committee at the time was Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), not Deutch. Second, there is no such thing as a House Foreign Relations Committee.

There is, however, a Senate Foreign Relations Committee. We presume Blumberg meant the House Foreign Affairs Committee.]

Blumberg alludes to the letter being about “our project” and that it was sent to “the Egyptian Ambassador”. This could be a reference to Mohamed M. Tawfik, who had been appointed as Egypt’s Ambassador to the U.S. by Mohammed Mursi.

According to the El-Ajyal article, in another email, sent around the time of Philip’s email in August of 2012, David Blumberg refers to the two Congressmen as “my father’s friends” who are awaiting a response from Egypt’s ambassador regarding his country’s reaction and that Nasser’s “request has been fulfilled” with the letter from Diaz-Balart and Deutch.

The younger Blumberg, possibly eager to see the deal move forward, is quoted as saying:

“I admire how your administration runs things, but there are other countries interested in the project. It is important to have a clear understanding about the way it’s run.”

[Note: we are not in possession of any of the emails referred to by El-Ajyal or El-Watn from the August, 2012 time frame, only the ones referred to as being from May, 2013.]

Nasser then reportedly communicated with Philip Blumberg to assure him that he had begun working with the Ministry of Commerce to proceed with the project adding,

“I’ve also found a way, in the case of what we were able to combine the amount of
U.S. aid towards the project to create a short list of American companies only.”

Correspondence allegedly ended on September 20, 2012, with a letter from Nasser to Essam el-Haddad and an aid to Philip Blumberg regarding a need to re-schedule a meeting with al-Shater. This is the same el-Haddad mentioned above.

Email #1 from David Blumberg to Ezz Nasser.

Email #1 from David Blumberg to Ezz Nasser.

Transcript:

Dear Ezz,

You have received the Congressional letter from Congressman Ted Deutch, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee, and Congressman Mario Diaz Balart, member of the House Foreign Appropriations Committee, to theEgyptian Ambassador on our project.

The House Foreign Appropriations Committee allocates all US foreign aid, and is the committee holding back the additional $750 million in American aid. The House Foreign Relations Committee also influences aid and other policy matters toward Egypt.

I hope you and Eng. al-Shater appreciate how extraordinary it is to receive a joint letter from both Democrat and Republican.

Here Blumberg was indicating that the decision to withhold or release aid to Egypt rested – at least partially – in the hands of two Congressmen – one Democrat and one Republican – who penned a letter to Egyptian government officials. Al-Shater forwards such emails to his Chief of Staff and former Clinton Foundation employee, Gehad el-Haddad:

Email from Nasser to David Blumberg.

Email from Nasser to David Blumberg.

MOST significantly, it matters not a whit that Blumberg’s actual deal was never “consummated”, after all, many financial deals go south. However, what DOES matter is that American businesses are scheming with Brotherhood operatives to get deals done, despite the fact that their financial relationships (inevitably) fund anti-western jihad!

Not only that, but the butchering of Coptic Christians (and other minorities) requires much needed financing. Do they even ask: where are these monies coming from? Does anyone care that Hamas’s parent, Egypt’s Brotherhood, supplies Israel’s terror-laden neighbors with jihadi weaponry to murder as many Jews as possible?

So, how dare Blumberg Grain – others too – and wayward Congressional Reps lend them U.S. cover!

The POTUS…damn him for eternity!

OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
6

People, especially juries, tend to look for “smoking guns” when trying to determine another’s guilt or innocence. Well and good. But it is often the case that circumstantial evidence – threads which weave together to demonstrate criminal intent and culpability- is more than enough to paint the full picture. Many vile criminals have been locked up due to said needling.

NOW, in relation to Obama Inc. – a criminal enterprise dressed up as the leadership of the free world – anyone who is waiting for a “smoking gun”, well, good luck with that. Yes, it would be great to have recordings of this and that, but rational folks understand it ain’t gonna happen.

In light of the above, it is instructive to piece together the intersecting linkages of guilt. As such, we will see how we came from there to here – to two interlocking crimes; one which IGNORES the letter of the law and the other which materially aids terrorists !

The latest crime committed by Obama Inc. – within every respect imaginable – violates ACTUAL legal precepts! Said enshrined law was predicated on preventing terrorists from ever coming into the U.S., regardless of circumstances. Hence, the all important (as readers will note below) mandate of “material support” became legal doctrine! Nevertheless, “legal” cover to terrorists is stamped under the imprimatur of the top law enforcement official of the land, AG Eric Holder. Mind blowing.

Indeed, many readers have read about this regime’s “koshering” of terrorists, whether under the guise of “refugee” status or otherwise. But few understand the underpinnings which set this stage, from the onset of the Islamist-in-Chief’s first term, to the latest violation of U.S. criminal (counter terror derived) law. But do bear in mind, families who truly seek asylum, those who are NOT compromised by terror, are told – GO TO HELL:Obama Bid to Deport Homeschool Refugees May Threaten U.S. Rights!

Smoking Gun One:

IF one expected that Obama’s Dept of (in)Justice would be in the forefront of exposing a recent act of Islamic barbarism, oh my, you would be wrong: WASHINGTON, MEDIA, DEPT OF (in)JUSTICE, RELIGIOUS, CIVIC LEADERS DEADLY SILENT. ISLAM, A METASTASIZING SCOURGE ON AMERICA (Video). 

Smoking Gun Two:

In tandem with Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (lawbreaking) chief law enforcement officer, DHS, AN OUTLAW, RENEGADE AGENCY IS CAUGHT FERRYING ILLEGALS & USURPING LAW & ORDER. A MIRROR OF AG HOLDER’S LAWLESSNESS! 

Foxes all over the (American) hen house…

Smoking Gun Three:

But it is not as if the regime’s crimes have gone unnoticed, hell no:Movement To IMPEACH AG Holder:Crimes Surpass Articles of Impeachment.Jail Time Warranted.

Smoking Gun Number Four:

Is it any wonder that some rightfully conclude: America Is Heading Towards An Islamic Nation: DHS/Obama Inc. On Board. Imams In America Continuously Incite Against Christians & Jews, Yet They Aren’t Thwarted.

Smoking Gun Five:

In line with America’s so-called “border war”, The Lawbreaker-in-Chief Guts The Law. The Sham of Immigration “Reform”. So, what does that tell you about Obama Inc.’s ill intent towards America, as well as their penchant for lawbreaking?

Smoking Gun Six:

Not to place a too fine point on it, but is anyone shocked that Holder’s DOJ Is Working Towards Invoking Islamic “Blasphemy” Laws In The USA?

Smoking Gun Seven:

And, whereas Muslims fleeing internal wars can now enter America, DESPITE any material support given to terrorism, and in contravention to U.S. criminal law, on the flip side, American Warriors Are DENIED Legal Counsel/Due Process, But Muslim-American “Soldiers for Allah” Remain Protected!

To wit, a “natural” anti-American, pro Islamist progression leads from there to here….

U.S. Lifts Ban on Immigrants With Links to Terrorism

The Obama admin.is overriding the U.S. Criminal Code for individuals who have provided material support to terrorism.
BY CLARE LOPEZ

Sun, February 16, 2014

  • U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship. (Photo: © Reuters)

U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship.

Muslim Brotherhood affiliates scored a major victory in their efforts to degrade U.S. national security measures in early February 2014 when the Obama administration decided to override by fiat portions of the U.S. Criminal Code and immigration policy pertaining to individuals who provide “material support to terrorism.”

As published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2014, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State issued a joint notice that, henceforth, certain asylum seekers and refugees who only provided “limited material support” to terrorism would be allowed into the U.S.

The earlier law as written, The Real ID Law of 2005, states quite explicitly that the definition of engaging in terrorist activity includes:

To commit an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit … to a terrorist organization [emphasis added]

Such activity, no matter how minor, constituted grounds for exclusion from entry to the U.S.

By unilaterally lifting restrictions — without so much as consulting Congress — for those intending immigrants who engaged in “(1) certain routine commercial transactions or certain routine social transactions (i.e., in the satisfaction of certain well-established or verifiable family, social, or cultural obligations), [or] (2) certain humanitarian assistance,” that benefited terrorist organizations, the Obama administration simply overrode existing law. So far, both the judicial and legislative branches of the U.S. government have let the administration get away with it.

According to the Daily Caller, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson and Secretary of State John Kerry signed the exemptions despite very real concerns about the legality of the executive branch deciding to ignore aspects of an existing law it doesn’t want to enforce and replacing them with its own guidelines.

Former State Department official and current director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies Jessica Vaughan worried as well that “those evaluating these cases will be ordered to ignore red flags in the applications, especially if the applicant is supported by one of the many advocacy groups that have the ear of senior DHS staff.”

The new policy decree marks a significant win for agents of influence belonging to advocacy groups acting on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda to pursue “civilization jihad” “to destroy Western civilization from within…by [our] hands,” as asserted in the “Explanatory Memorandum,” a key Brotherhood document introduced as evidence in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial.

As described at some length in “The Islamists’—and their Enablers’—Assault on the Right: The Case Against Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan,” an February 11, 2014 dossier of particulars published by the Center for Security Policy (CSP), it is precisely in executing political influence operations aimed at U.S. national security leadership (whether Republican or Democratic) that the Muslim Brotherhood so excels.

The CSP paper explains in exhaustive detail and with meticulously referenced citations how the Muslim Brotherhood targeted the Republican Party and the conservative movement over a period of years and succeeded in placing senior operatives such as Abdurahman Alamoudi, Sami al-Arian, Nihad Awad, and Khaled Saffuri deep inside senior leadership circles.

It was at those top levels of government—the Executive Branch, the Intelligence Community, and the National Security Council—where critical decision-making took place, especially in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, that set U.S. counter terrorism strategy on a hopeless loop that deliberately avoided, and indeed later would forbid, knowledge about Islamic doctrine, law and scripture as the animating inspiration for Islamic terrorism.

By divorcing the enemy’s core ideology from study of the enemy threat doctrine, Muslim Brotherhood agents of influence succeeded in ensuring that U.S. blood and treasure would be endlessly and fruitlessly expended in Counterinsurgency (COIN) warfare, nation-building exercises and democracy experiments in the most unsuitable places possible: Muslim lands under rule of Islamic law (sharia).

As noted in CSP’s 2010 Team B II Report, “Shariah: The Threat to America,” Americans do pretty well at defending against military-style frontal assaults. We do far less well, though, at either recognizing or countering the “menace posed by jihadist enemies who operate by deceit and stealth from inside the gates.”

And yet it is the latter threat that poses a far more serious threat to open, tolerant societies like ours than the openly terrorist attack like the one that struck on 9/11.

As cited by CSP’s Norquist and Khan report, the Washington Post described the stealthy operating style of the Muslim Brotherhood in a revealing September 11, 2004 front page article, “In Search of Friends Among the Foes.”

Juan Zarate, then-chief of the Treasury Department’s terror finance unit, admitted confusion about the Brotherhood and how it operated through familiar Western business enterprises but with Islamic “philosophy and ultimate objectives” that are antithetical to our own. Through a disciplined strategy and patient willingness to work under the radar for decades, they progress towards specific goals and, ultimately, “conquest through dawah,” as Yousef al-Qaradawi, senior jurist of the Muslim Brotherhood, has put it.

So it has been with the steady campaign to chip away at U.S. counter terrorism legislation and policy, much of it, like the Patriot Act, implemented in the months and years following 9/11.

In his 2007 book, “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated America,” Paul Sperry noted, for instance, that, by securing key positions within the White House, such as the Office of Public Liaison, for Brotherhood operatives like Suhail Khan, access by various Islamic organizations could be controlled.

Likewise, the appointment of Mohamed Magid, president of theIslamic Society of North America (ISNA), the largest Muslim Brotherhood front organization in the country, to the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group in 2010, served to place a top Brotherhood operative in a key position from which to influence U.S. counter terrorism policy.

In July 2012, Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, joined by four other courageous Representatives, sent letters to the Inspectors General of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, requesting each to investigate the extent of Muslim Brotherhood influence in these respective agencies.

Rep. Bachmann followed up with a sixteen-page letter to Rep. Keith Ellison (who had criticized the investigation request) in which she laid out documented instances of apparent Muslim Brotherhood influence over U.S. policy. These included Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s February 2011 testimony before Congress, in which he described the openly jihadist Muslim Brotherhood as “secular;” drastic, pro-Brotherhood policy initiatives by the State Department, during a period when Huma Abedin, who had been closely involved with the Muslim Brotherhood for years, served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton; and U.S. cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on a pro-sharia campaign to criminalize the criticism of Islam.

With the 2011-2012 government-wide Great Purge of training curriculum related to fact-based instruction about Islam followed by the wholesale backing for the al-Qa’eda and Muslim Brotherhood-led revolts in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, U.S. policy is far gone along the pathway of acquiescence to a jihad and sharia agenda. When Hani Nour Eldin, member of Gama’at al-Islamiyya, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, was granted a visa in June 2012 to visit the White House in order to petition the National Security Council for the release of Omar Abdel Rahman (the Blind Sheikh), the warning indicators were already well in evidence that the Obama administration was turning the Global War on Terror policy on its head.

Allowing political asylees and refugees known to have provided material support to terrorism to enter the country is yet one more milestone step bringing U.S. policy into closer compliance with sharia objectives—to our great detriment.

So, let us step into the real world and grab onto the FACTS that we have. They are more than explosive, and lead to one irrefutable conclusion:Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia feels triumphant, as well they should. Yes, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES “PHASE 3” FROM “THE PLAN”, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO! 

In actuality, while the Islamist-in-Chief floods America with terrorists – “materially” connected or what not – certain towns are overrun with the newest “refugees” and many haven’t a clue.

On the other hand, in an Orwellian twist of fate, along comes an Egyptian-American, a physician who was part of Egypt’s Air Force, and he wants to settle the score:Egyptian Doctor Files Terrorism Complaint With U.S. Congress Against Barack Obama!

NEVERTHELESS, can you hear the jihadists gloating – Allahu Akbar…الله أكبر ….America will be ours??