Is Any More Evidence Required To Demonstrate The Pernicious Effects Of The Islamist-in-Chief’s Middle East Mischief Making? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As is said, the proof is in the pudding…or atop the dead bodies littering the region.

Thus, as tens of thousands die, due to the unrestrained hands of Iran’s terror axis, the Islamist-in-Chief stays Israel’s hand, and to a lesser extent Turkey’s. Nevertheless, this blogger has enough on her plate, so worrying over the ambitions ( for regional hegemony, as he seeks to become the next Caliph ) of Erdogan, Turkey’s Islamist leader, as well as Israel’s foe, is hardly top priority.

The fact of the matter is that the lone superpower, under the enabling of its Islamist-in-Chief, is emboldening the most mortal foes of the west. And the evidence is clear for the world to see – or not.

‘Syria, Iran, Hizballah attack while US and Israel play computerized war games’

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis October 20, 2012

The assassination of the anti-Syrian Head of the Lebanon’s Internal Security Forces intelligence branch, Brig. Gen. Wissam al-Hasan, Friday, Oct. 19, by a huge car bomb blast in East Beirut’s Ashrafiya district marked the brutal spillover of the Syrian bloodbath into a second Arab capital and the threat of itsl spread towards Israel.
Eighteen months ago, in May 2011, shortly after Syrians rose up against Bashar Assad, Rami Makhlouf, a leading architect of his tactics of suppression, warned, “If there is no stability here, there’s no way there will be stability in Israel.”
Israel should take careful note of the outrage in Beirut in which seven Lebanese were killed and 73 injured in order to liiquidate Assad’s foe in Beirut.

In August, Gen. Al-Hasan uncovered a Syrian plot to destabilize Lebanon by a bombing campaign and arrested the pro-Syrian politician and ex-information minister Michel Samaha for complicity in the plot. He also led the investigation that implicated Damascus in the 2005 bombing atrocity that killed former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.
Gen. Al-Hasan’s murder brought forth angry protesters.They blocked roads and highways in several towns including the Beirut-Syrian road link as the Lebanese government met in emergency session Saturday, Oct. 20, and announced a day of national mourning.
In the wider sense, the murder of the Lebanese anti-Syrian terror crusader demonstrated that hopes in the West and Israel of the Syrian conflict eventually sundering the Tehran-Damascus-Hizballah axis were no better than pipedreams, just like the belief that liquidating Iran’s nuclear scientists or cyber warfare would turn Tehran back from its march towards a nuclear weapon.
After nearly two years, those illusions have been dissipated: The Syrian bloodbath is spreading more malignantly than ever with solid Iranian and Hizballah support and Tehran is closer than ever to realizing its nuclear aspirations.
This week, US President Barack Obama reined in Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and his chief of staff Gen. Necdet Ozel from expanding Turkish cross-border clashes with Syria by sending Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, to Ankara. His restraining hand kept Turkey from going beyond artillery backing for Syrian rebels inside a10-kilometer limit inside Syria. He also cautioned the Turks against sending their warplanes across the border into Syrian airspace.
Because of these curbs, US Ambassador to Turkey Francis Ricciardone was able to state Tuesday “We don’t see a possibility of war between Syria and Turkey.” He spoke to reporters in Ankara with the top American soldier beside him.

If they were talking, Turkish Erdogan could compare notes with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has experienced similar Washington restraints against launching military action to curtail Iran’s nuclear program.

Whether or not the United States should step into the two blazing conflicts with two feet – or limit itself to extending military support from the outside to the forces willing to take on Syria and Iran – is a tough question which the two US presidential contenders, Barack Obama and Mitt Romney may address in their third and final pre-election debate in Florida, Monday, Oct. 22.
The differences between the rivals on this point don’t appear substantial. However their contest in the run-up to the Nov.6 election has diverted attention from Ankara and Jerusalem and rescued the Turkish and Israeli leaders from even tougher questions about their reluctance to act without America – Turkey versus Syria and Israel versus Iran –  although the Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah menace is knocking on their doors.
They are not alone. The list of Middle East governments, shy of acting without America against encroaching threats from one or more of the three aggressors, includes Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the rest of the Gulf emirates.
The rulers of Russia, Iran and its Lebanese arm Hizballah, in contrast, were emboldened by the US ambassador’s comment in Ankara, its effect on Erdogan and Netanyahu’s non-response to the Iranian stealth drone’s invasion of Israeli air space. They concluded that both leaders would continue to sit on their hands.
And so Assad seized the moment for sending his air force to assault opposition forces with unprecedented fury. Cluster bombs were dropped without mercy on urban areas, causing an estimated 1,200 deaths and reducing entire villages and small towns to smoking rubble.
And his assassins struck across the border into the heart of Beirut for a devastating bombing attack that recalled the horrors of a former Assad bombing campaign against his Lebanese opponents, one of which dispatched the former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri in 2005.
Every few days, the Syria-Hizballah-Iran bloc ratchets up the violence with a new outrage in the certainty that there will be no comeback.
Sunday, Oct. 21, the US and Israel launch Austere Challenge 12, which they are calling their biggest joint war game ever, to practice defending Israel against a missile attack.
But in tune with the general air of denial hanging over Washington and Jerusalem, the exercise has been reduced in scale to just 1,000 soldiers on each side, with most of the action conducted through simulated computer games. As every soldier knows, this is a far cry from real operations on a battlefield.

Both American and Israeli war planners also realize that even these games are only applicable to defenses against an Iranian ballistic missile attack – not a triple Iranian-Syrian-Hizballah missile assault. This would call for US-Israeli air force intervention. But the air force is not taking part in the war game.”

IF any further analysis/evidence is required, to shore up yesterday’s thesis at this blog- – the above link from DEBKA yields more than enough firepower.

What Are The Chances Of Reining In A Lawbreaker-in-Chief…Who Abets Illegal Aliens…Then Punishes Those Who Expose Said Lawbreaking? Addendum To : The Results Of Washington’s Dictator-in-Chief Via Short Video…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Once a lawbreaker, always a lawbreaker, unless requisite lessons are learned. In other words, without proper intervention – either family-wise or institutional – the chances of “going straight” are slimmer than a virgin in a whorehouse. Even a rookie cop knows the score.

So, what chance is there to rein in a Renegade-in-Chief, and his lawless AG, when lawbreaking has become their “rule of law”? A snowball in hell.

The preponderance of evidence, indicting the two chief culprits, is overwhelming. And their penchant for lawbreaking invariably is politically based, knowing full well that “legalizing” illegals will shore up their voting base. Not only that, but like typical hoods, they indict others for their moral failings, to hell with the wreckage in their wake.

Thus, the Liar-in-Chief tells so many tall tales, it is impossible to know where one begins, and another ends –

Hail to the Chief Liar.

NOT unlike goons all over, he too has his squads, ready, willing and able to execute his plans –

Again, political ends underlie the Liar-in-Chief’s modus operandi, unlike garden variety thugs who usually terrorize for a quick financial score –

For those in need of video footage, here’s the fruits of their (mis)labors – the following, from FoxNews, attests to their absolute flouting of the law of the land – the Constitution.

‘Obama’s refusal to deport illegal aliens unconstitutional, say law professors’


October 13, 2012

“Two law professors, including one who served in the Bush Justice Department, have published a paper charging that President Obama violated the Constitution with his directive to law enforcement not to deport illegal aliens.

In the paper entitled, “The Obama Administration, the Dream Act and the Take Care Clause,” authors Robert Delahunty of the University of St. Thomas [Minnesota] and John Yoo, a law professor at University of California at Berkeley and former U.S. deputy assistant attorney general, blast Obama’s moratorium on deporting certain illegal immigrants. The professors dismissed the idea that the decision on whether to deport illegal immigrants who are arrested for minor infractions is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.

“It’s the duties of the president. He must always uphold the law.”

– John Yoo, Berkeley law professor and former State Department attorney

“If there’s one case and it’s left to the prosecutor well that’s fine, but what Obama did was take a million cases and leave it up to prosecutorial discretion, “John Yoo said to “The only reason it’s under [Department of Homeland Security Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s discretion is because Obama had made his decision. If she’s doing it under her own, she would have to be fired.”

An abstract for the paper debunks the claim that the president has the Constitutional right to not enforce civil laws crafted and passed by Congress.

“It’s the duty of the president. He must always uphold the law,” Yoo said, adding that the only exceptions in doing so are if laws are unconstitutional or if prosecuting them can be reasonably deemed not viable.

Officials from the White House declined to comment on the paper, referring to DHS.

“The authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to exercise prosecutorial discretion, including by granting deferred action, has long been established and has been recognized by the Supreme Court,” said DHS spokesman Peter Boogaard. “This authority was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court just this year [Arizona v. United States (2012)].”

“That said, DHS’s deferred action for childhood arrivals process is only a temporary measure that does not provide a path to citizenship; Congress must still act to provide a permanent solution to fix the broken immigration system.  Until Congress acts, DHS is dedicated to implementing smart, effective reforms to the immigration system that allow it to focus its resources on common sense enforcement priorities, including criminals and other public safety threats.”

In June, President Obama announced that the deporting of young, undocumented immigrants who match criteria from already-proposed DREAM Act lesgilastion would end under his administration’s watch. The effect was to put in place most of the measures in the act, but by administrative order, not through the legislative process. In August, a group of federal agents filed a lawsuit against DHS secretary Janet Napolitano, claiming that the new directive forces them to break the law.

Under the DREAM Act, illegal aliens who are eligible beneficiaries would not have faced deportation as long as they meet the following criteria:

  • Proof of having arrived in the United States before age 16.
  • Proof of residence in the United States for at least five consecutive years since their arrival date.
  • Register with the Selective Service if they are male.
  • Be between the ages of 12 and 35 at the time that the bill was enacted.
  • Obtained a high school diploma of GED, or admitted to an institution of higher education.
  • Be of good moral character.

Opponents of the DREAM Act, which still has not been passed in Congress, say that it – as well as Obama’s order, encourages illegal immigration while adding economic and social burdens to the United States.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who was a key backer of the DREAM Act, blasted the president’s preemption of the in June, when DHS announced policies on immigration enforcement that.

“There is broad support for the idea that we should figure out a way to help kids who are undocumented through no fault of their own, but there is also broad consensus that it should be done in a way that does not encourage illegal immigration in the future. This is a difficult balance to strike, one that this new policy, imposed by executive order, will make harder to achieve in the long run.”

“…by once again ignoring the Constitution and going around Congress, this short term policy will make it harder to find a balanced and responsible long term one.”

Par for the course, what else can one expect from an anti-American regime, other than to punish those who expose said lawbreaking, and also question the bonafides/motives of “Dear Leader”?

Here’s what else one can expect:

‘ATF Whistleblower Fired in Denny’s Parking Lot For Exposing Corruption’

Special Agent Vince Cefalu has worked for the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms for more than 25 years. On top of successfully placing dozens of hard criminals behind bars throughout his career, Cefalu has received promotions and consistently positive evaluations. When he started raising his voice about ATF corruption and illegal wiretapping in 2005, things changed.  Tuesday evening, Cefalu was asked to meet Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Division Joseph Riehl at a Denny’s Restaurant near Lake Tahoe. When he arrived, he was served termination papers in the parking lot. Classy move. The exchange was secretly recorded by a confidential source. David Codrea has more:

The video, shaky at times from being handheld, and with color imbalance streaking happening inadvertently in the uploading to YouTube, was recorded by a confidential source and shows Cefalu approached by two ATF management representatives including Joseph M. Riehl, Special Agent in Charge of the San Francisco Field Division, which encompasses Northern California and Nevada field offices.

Riehl, seen talking to Cefalu through his Jeep window and reportedly telling him he couldn’t leave because he had to sign papers, had been criticized on the CUATF forum, and Gun Rights Examiner is attempting to track down audit reports to determine what an independent assessment reveals about the allegations there. But the bottom line is, an employee with over 25 years of service who has been a leading spokesman for whistleblowers was unceremoniously canned in a public parking lot by senior division management.

Cefalu was placed on administrative leave a year and a half ago after speaking out about Operation Fast and Furious. In 2009, he launched the website in order for agents within ATF to blow the whistle on corrupt behavior anonymously due to the agency’s history of retaliation against those who “jump their chain of command.” His website is where bloggers and news reporters first saw allegations of gunwalking. The site is heavily monitored by the Department of Justice.

In the February 2012 issue of Townhall Magazine, Cefalu detailed the ATF corruption leading up to Fast and Furious and his retaliation case coming from inside the bureau that led to his firing this week.

My name is Vincent A. Cefalu. I am a special agent for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms under the U.S. Department of Justice. Welcome to our nightmare. I say “our” because dozens of us can’t write a single article, and I have been asked and am privileged to speak on behalf of my peers who have not had the opportunity to voice their concerns related to ATF mismanagement, particularly with Operation Fast and Furious. This grotesquely dangerous and reckless operation should have never been considered, much less allowed to occur. It employed the unprecedented practice of allowing fi rearms to be transferred to violent criminals without any interdiction effort at all, in hopes of somehow later identifying high-level Mexican cartel members. But it was the pattern of gross mismanagement that had been allowed to exist in ATF—and that I witnessed—which fostered an environment that unleashed this operation, violating public trust on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border.

At no time in my career prior to becoming a complainant against my own agency—the agency I love and have been honored to serve— could I have ever been convinced I would be the poster boy for whistleblowers and challenges to corrupt government. As a young Marine military policeman, I was thrilled, proud and honored to be in law enforcement. I never considered it work….

But I ended up the lead agent in a case with huge vendetta overtones by my state and local counterparts, where members of an ad hoc task force insisted on fast-tracking wiretap attempts against the suspects. I refused. When I reported this officially, senior management retroactively fabricated justifications for the actions they were preparing to take against me. This led to a network of frustrated agents and inspectors, which ultimately resulted in my being contacted regarding the gun-walking practices and cover-ups related to Fast and Furious. I took this information to Congress and advocated others to do the same.

In the 18 months leading up to Fast and Furious, Special Agent in Charge Bill Newell’s actions required that the agency had to pay out over a million dollars in settlements which should have led to his removal for the related conduct, had it ever been investigated and documented. Special Agent in Charge George Gillette had been disciplined multiple times, and his subordinates had logged dozens of complaints related to his incompetence and mismanagement. Had ATF dealt with them at the time, the Fast and Furious program would never have been undertaken. However, by attacking those who exposed corruption, ATF was able to keep their golden boys in place. This process was repeated all over the country (Newell has since been relocated to D.C. headquarters, but not fired). So pronounced was the mismanagement that ATF logged more complaints than either the DEA or FBI per agent. This is notable because the latter two are much larger agencies.

I write this article almost 6 years into the whistleblower process with ATF and only after millions of taxpayer dollars and countless hours of manpower have been expended by my agency to attack and discredit me and other whistleblowers.

The environment at ATF today is one where honest officers cannot act without fear of reprisal from dishonest officers. Such is this agent’s story, and the story of many other whistleblowers, including those involved in Fast and Furious.

Whistleblowers are often put under the supervision of corrupt ATF officials who have the intention of retaliating against them no matter what the circumstances. The Department of Justice has done little to prevent this behavior despite the act of retaliation being illegal and a violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act.

ATF’s termination decision comes just weeks after Senator Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General James Cole about a rift between the Reno ATF Field Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

As you may be aware, I recently contacted both Nevada U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) Acting Director B. Todd Jones about allegations from whistleblowers that a breakdown in relations had occurred between ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) in Reno, Nevada.[1]  I have not yet received a briefing from either of their offices.

The alleged breakdown is illustrated in a declination memorandum from the Reno USAO, which indicates that as of September 29, 2011, the Reno USAO categorically refused to accept any cases submitted by Reno ATF.  The declination memo states, “We are willing to consider your cases again when your management addresses and resolves the issues at hand.”[2]  Apparently as a consequence, ATF’s Reno Field Office has only opened one case in 2012, as the attached chart indicates.[3]

I have since obtained documents from whistleblowers which indicate that these issues were raised with ATF headquarters and the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) almost a year ago.  According to one document, ATF agents in Reno notified ATF’s Internal Affairs Division of the issue on October 13, 2011.[4]  According to a second document, an ATF agent in Reno notified OPR on October 25, 2011.[5]  As you may know, because of ATF and the Reno USAO’s inability to resolve these issues, three ATF line agents and a supervisor were transferred out of Reno in April 2012.

In light of these facts, I am seeking to understand whether Justice Department management was also notified of the problems between ATF and the USAO in Reno, and if so, what actions were taken to rectify these issues.  Your office, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), is responsible for overseeing both ATF and U.S. Attorneys.

Cefalu says he will challenge ATF’s decision. The following was posted on CleanUpATF shortly after the termination was issued.

Well, they’ve finally gone ahead and done it. ATF’s San Francisco hatchet men just served Special Agent Vince Cefalu with termination papers in the parking lot of a Dennys. They did this over a year and half after proposing the termination . Notwithstanding the transparently trumped-up nature of the so-called “charges” in question, proposing a termination and then excuting it over a year and a half later is prima facie evidence that the action is unsustainable and is virtually certain to be reversed on appeal.

Moreover, the allegations used as a basis for the adverse action are laughably unfounded, deliberately fabricated, and relied largely on the testimony of ATF officials who committed easily-provable felony perjury in open court and later in sworn depositions. I herein predict that a number of the people involved in this grotesque act of bald-faced unlawful retaliation and obstruction of justice will do significant jail time before this is all over.

I will also say with confidence that this was by far the stupidest , most ill-advised course of action that they (ATF management) could possibly have taken in this case. Rather than quietly settling what a mediocre first-year law student would recognize to be a Hindenburg of a losing case (for them), ATF just substantially amplified the damages award that Cefalu will, in my opinion, recover at trial. Talk about stepping in it.

It’s well-known that ATF management and their viciously corrupt counsel are, for the most part, brutally self-serving and mean-spirited. But this Cefalu termination is nevertheless surprising in its utter incomprehensibility under the circumstances, from purely legal and elemental federal labor law standpoints. If they had any prayer of making the action stick, they had to do it more than a year ago, before so many additional events have transpired that will render the termination plainly unlawful and inescapably untenable. It’s just plain moronic no matter how you slice it.

It seems apparent that ATF’s leadership at all levels has degenerated to a pathetic state of paroxysmal, shoot-from-the-hip incompetence. They can’t even do the wrong thing right.

Things are far from over.” –

How far has the U.S. fallen, to have (s)elected such thuggish, gangsters-in-suits to lead the nation? 

It’s a rhetorical – but no less painful – question.


UPDATE: See Link At End: Is A Deal Being Cut With Iran’s Hitlerite Regime To Save the Islamist-in-Chief’s Electoral Prospects…Smokin’ The Free World In The Process?..Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Cutting to the chase.

IF Israel’s leaders cooperate with the Islamist-in-Chief, helping him (in any way, shape or form) play this deadly game with the Iranian Hitler, then they too are unworthy of taking care of cats and dogs. In effect, they will be sealing Israel’s fate, as well as half of world Jewry. In tandem, American citizens will be placed in GRAVE danger. America is the Big Satan – their ultimate prey. However, Israel has to succumb first.

Now, this blogger is VERY suspicious of the timing of the current war games in Israel, between US & Israeli forces. In other words, this mega exercise was initially scheduled for the summer and suddenly it was canceled, rescheduled to two weeks BEFORE the election! 

VERY convenient.

Now, what better way to hold the IDF in check, than to have US boots on our soil? In other words, no rational Israeli leader wants US boots on the ground during a pre-emption. However, close by – in the region – is in everyone’s best interest. Few will argue with this thesis. The point being, the IDF needs unfettered room to operate!

Along comes this scuttlebutt and yours truly knows, where there is smoke there is fire. Ladies and gents, this blogger believes the free world has been smoked!

Pay rapt attention to the part Valerie Jarrett plays in this western betrayal…and recall this blogger’s previous assertions –


Sanctions to vanish in exchange for ‘temporary’ halt in enrichment work

Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar.

The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.

The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.

French intelligence verified today that Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement, according to Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former intelligence officer in the regime who has defected to Europe.

The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.

The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.

According to the Iranian source, a previous Obama letter to Khamenei indicated that it’s best for the regime not to give any motive to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, a message that was re-emphasized in the Qatar negotiations.

As reported exclusively by WND Oct. 4, a three-person delegation led by a woman on behalf of the Obama administration traveled to Qatar about Oct. 1 and met with Iranian counterparts, including Ali Akbar Velayati, the former foreign minister of the Islamic regime and a close adviser to Khamenei on international matters.

In the meeting, according to the source, the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected. A Romney presidency, the delegation said, would surely move more toward Israel, and the Iranians were reminded that Obama has stood up to Israel against any plans to attack Iran. The regime’s delegate was urged to understand that if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.

Days after the WND report, Ali Akbar Salehi, the regime’s foreign minister, in an
interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, stated, “If our right to enrichment is guaranteed, we are prepared to offer an exchange.”

The same message was relayed by several other officials of the regime.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently in Kazakhstan that the sanctions can be lifted immediately if Tehran worked with world powers to address questions about its nuclear program.

In the Qatar meeting, according to the Iranian source, the American woman delegate, who has had several meetings with Velayati during the past several years, jokingly told Velayati that she will be the next secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in a second Obama administration and that it would be wise for Iranians to invest in U.S. real estate.

In the past five months, four meetings were held in the U.S. with the Islamic regime’s surrogates to hash out what was to be discussed at the Doha meeting. The source identified Valerie Jarrett, a senior Obama adviser, as the head of the U.S. effort to engage Iran. Also identified was Cyrus Amir Mokri, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department for financial institutions, as another member advising the president on the issue.

Jarrett’s family has known the Velayati family since their stay in Iran in the 1950s, the source added. Jarrett’s father worked at the Namazi hospital in Shiraz, owned by an Iranian family that has been influential with the regime after the Islamic Revolution.

WND contacted both the U.S. State Department and the White House, asking about the Doha negotiations, who led the delegation from the U.S., whether Obama will provide the written guarantee, what negotiations the U.S. has pursued on its own and what is known about Amano’s plan to travel to Iran for the announcement.

The State Department declined to respond to multiple calls as well as email inquiries. A spokeswoman said the White House would not comment.

The European Union, which increased sanctions on Iran last week, fears back-channel negotiations between the Obama administration and Iran will leave it out. EU leaders are seeking to send a group of representatives from seven European countries to Tehran to strengthen their position with the regime over the nuclear program and their economic interests.

The Iranian currency, meanwhile, has hit another historic low, falling to 43,000 rials to one U.S. dollar. As reported recently, a secret memo by the Intelligence Ministry to regime officials has warned of major riots in Iran due to dire economic conditions.

Another internal report by the government’s Economic Commission indicated that government foreign currency reserves will run out in the coming months and that it will have difficulty meeting payrolls for public employees who could lose 50 percent of their pay.

Many within the Iranian opposition believe that if the West continues to pressure the Islamic regime and supports the aspirations of the majority of the Iranian people who resent the regime and its ideology, the regime will face a nationwide uprising and will collapse from within, changing the geopolitics of not only the region but the world.

However, if the regime is provided a lifeline for whatever reason, not only will it get the bomb but it will take Iranians and the world hostage for decades to come, they believe.

An Oct. 8 WND report revealed another secret nuclear site in Iran. The regime’s nuclear scientists have successfully completed testing of a neutron detonator and have nearly completed design of a nuclear warhead.”

To be sure, if Jerusalem was less afraid of Washington, than they are of Iran’s killing machine (and the rest of her terror proxies), none of this would matter. Those in the know understand this – the stranglehold that Washington has over Israel is way more dangerous than her surrounding enemies. Unrestrained (and by extension, the question becomes: who is tying her hands?) the region can be re-arranged, and in Israel’s favor. Jerusalem has the requisite firepower.

Besides, the threat of a cutoff of U.S. military aid ( a drop in Israel’s GDP bucket…plus the costs of its attached strings…pushing said monies back into U.S. defense contractor’s coffers) is not Washington’s main grip. All the players know this. Its death-like vise constitutes a corrosive relationship between Washington & Jerusalem, and its main caveat takes root in the collusion between Israel’s ruling, leftist elite and their ‘friends’ in Washington. ( push aside any notion of a ‘right wing’ leadership…they are NOT in charge in Jerusalem –

The right ( no pun intended ) questions to ask have always been: why do Israel’s political leaders allow her enemies to still stand, understanding full well the absolute strength of their country’s military capabilities? Why do they always stop short of VICTORY?

The answers tell the deadly tale, and many Israelis/Jews are its sacrifices.

UPDATE: – see this –

Hillary Takes The Fall For The POTUS In Bengazigate…But There IS A Silver Lining…Shining The Spotlight On Huma Abedin…Addendum To: Uncovering The Tip Of Huma Abedin’s Spear…The House of Al-Saud…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

How many times does a “gift toss in the mouth” come along ( directed at the general public, thereby, giving them a golden opportunity to pressure their reps to perform their due diligence), especially when it concerns matters of top national security considerations? Rarely, if ever. Why not? Because officials at the highest levels have many handy helpers to cover their wayward/illicit tracks.

So, along comes the Liar-in-Chief doing what he does best, that is, lie…lie…and lie some more. The trail ( to just some of his many lies ) can be found at this blog – But certain lies offer unique opportunities to ferret out important truths, and Bengazigate should be a major exhibit to prove said thesis.

Some issues are worthy of heavy lifting. This is one of them.

On the one hand, Hillary Clinton, in her capacity as Sec of State, is in charge of embassies around the world, plus other tasks. Nevertheless, there is enough circumstantial evidence pointing to the Islamist-in-Chief, for his failure to secure the safety of the embassy’s staff in Libya. Besides, the buck does stop with the POTUS, whether Democrat or Republican. 

Back to the gift toss. 

Readers are familiar with this blog’s “kinship” with Huma Abedin, Deputy Chief of Staff to gal pal, Hill. It is legitimate to ask: what has she done this time, to bring her back into the spotlight? Not a damn thing, other than be who she is  – an Islamist Muslim Brotherhood Mafia operative; joined at the hip with each and every decision coming out of her boss’s office –

Why is this relevant to Bengazigate? Consider: now that the POTUS threw Hill under the bus ( aren’t you all thoroughly shocked?), surely an official inquiry will require her to testify on all related matters. Far be if for this American-Israeli to take a quantum leap in logic, but isn’t it logical to assume, that a corroborating witness will be called upon to testify? And who is more qualified than the one person who shadows her each and every official (and some might suggest, unofficial ones too) move? 

It is gratifying not to be alone in one’s mental meanderings, simply because the above theory was formed BEFORE Walid Shoebat’s was brought forth, and he knows the score way better than most! Clearly this track of thinking opens up many delicious possibilities…manna from heaven.

‘Oversight Committee should call Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin to testify over Benghazi-gate’ – by  on OCTOBER 16, 2012

“With Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly accepting ‘responsibility’ for the security of all State Department diplomats stationed at the various outposts all over the world – including at the Benghazi consulate – shouldn’t the matter of her closest adviser, Huma Abedin become relevant again?

Hillary’s acceptance of responsibility should also come with a requirement to testify in front of the congressional committee that has decided to take the lead in investigating what happened at Benghazi.

That would be the House Oversight Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA).

Testimony given by four State Department officials at an Oversight Committee hearing on October 10th revealed that security – which Hillary has said she is ultimately responsible for – in Benghazi was woefully inadequate, despite repeated requests for additional security assets in Libya. Regional Security Officer (RSO) Eric Nordstrom was so frustrated with the State Department’s refusal to release assets that he said it felt like “the Taliban was on the inside of the building”. Lt. Col. Andrew Wood said of his own attempts to acquire additional security assets:

“We were fighting a losing battle. We couldn’t even keep what we had.”

The failures in Benghazi are becoming painfully obvious. They were political, cultural, procedural and the result of very bad policies implemented as a result of incompetence, negligence, or malice.

In October 10th testimony, Charlene Lamb, deputy assistant secretary for international programs at the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomat Security said in response to Rep. Sandy Adams (R-FL) that she did not have sole authority to deny requests for security assets. When Adams demanded the names of who did, Lamb begrudgingly provided them:

The two men Lamb singled out as being responsible for having the authority to deny security assets should also be called to testify.

However, while many may consider it admirable for Secretary Clinton to inform us all that the buck stops with her, any such admiration should come with an expectation of transparency and forthrightness. Responsibility without accountability isn’t worth a wooden nickel.

On June 13th, Rep. Michele Bachmann and four other congressmen sent five separate letters to five separate Inspectors General. One of those letters went to the Deputy Inspector General at the State Department. The primary concern expressed in the letters was the possibility that there has been Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. Government. The most controversial name mentioned by Bachmann, et. al. was Huma Abedin, who was singled out in theletter to the State Department. Abedin, Secretary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff and closest adviser, has extensive and irrefutable familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and an al-Qaeda financier named Abdullah Omar Naseef.

It has now been widely acknowledged that the attack in Benghazi was either perpetrated by al-Qaeda or entities sympathetic to al-Qaeda.

Remember, al-Qaeda is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. Though each group has shared goals, preferred means of achieving them are quite different.

That brings us back to Huma Abein. For twelve years, she worked as an Assistant Editor with the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), leaving in late 2008 to take a job with Hillary Clinton at the State Department.

Again, the IMMA was founded by none other than al-Qaeda financier Naseef, who served on the IMMA advisory board for many years while Huma sat on the Editorial Board.

While it may not be common protocol to call advisers to testify in front of congressional committees, the case of Huma Abedin does seem to present a unique set of circumstances. Her her mother and the wife of Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi being close colleagues in the Muslim Sisterhood.

By accepting responsibility for the security of all State Department diplomats, Hillary Clinton has welcomed the spotlight of scrutiny whether she wants it or not. As her closest adviser, Huma Abedin should not escape that spotlight in light of both her background and her significant influence on Hillary.

Based on Abedin’s connections to entities and individuals that have shown support for al-Qaeda’s agenda in the past, she should be required to testify as well.” …and some more to chew on –

Most significantly, the attack in Libya, by AlQaeda offshoots, was hardly unexpected, except maybe to the academically challenged, affirmative action college student. For heavens sake, embassy staff PLEADED for more security. More to the point, Obama & gang have some explaining to do –

Pressure…more pressure…

In concert, the very fact that the Islamist-in-Chief called for Qadaffi’s overthrow  (prepping the ground via Samantha Powers R2P template, similar to his ousting of Mubarak; thus empowering the Brotherhood Mafia & its Salafist counterparts…how stupid do they think regular folks are?),understanding full well that the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, the progenitor of AlQaeda would fill the void, lends a people’s indictment straight back to his door. He indeed set the Islamist train wreck in motion. Similarly, would giving bank robbers the keys to the vault ring any alarm bells?

Thus, not only should Barack HUSSEIN Obama be judged for his own wrongs (through his “assistance” to Islamists, whether overt or covert), but Huma Abedin’s less than six degrees of separation, to the attendant terror organs, must finally come to the public fore.

If not now, then when?

When Is The U.S. (& Others) Near Bowed? When Israeli Flags…Christians Too…Are Banned In A City Near You…Addendum To: Movie Makers, Corporate Heads, Police Too…Dancing To Islamic Edicts…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Some things can only effectively be described by the expletive – W T F.

Regardless, even when ones ability to still be shocked is slim to none, along comes an act of brazenness which may even defy the saltiest description. Wording aside, composure is in order so that counter attacks can be planned. Lovers of freedom and liberty dare not stay silent and lay prostrate.

To understand what is at stake the following should lead the charges against complacency; aimed directly at Islamic supremacists operating DEEP within America’s shores.

And the likes of Dearborn’s Islamists indeed have friends in high places – , making it that much harder for freedom-loving Americans to stop their surge.

Nevertheless, despite their leftist enablers, the only option for survival is to fight against them – , otherwise Americans will find themselves dancing to their Islamic edicts.


So is it any wonder that a Canadian ‘Jewish man was arrested for bringing his dog to anti-Israel rally’? – This is precisely what happens when Islamists run amok.

Leapfrogging onto the Christian community, here’s what happens when submission is unopposed – ‘AFLC Files Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit in Defense of Christians Stoned by Muslims at Arab Festival in Dearborn, Michigan’

Adding humiliation atop outrage, the ever incisive Daniel Greenfield, AKA Sultan Knish, tells his personal tale. You can’t make this crap up…wake me up from our western nightmare!

‘Israeli Flags Now Illegal in Dearbornistan’

October 15, 2012 By 

First, Christians were banned in Dearbornistan. Now, it’s Jews who are illegal. Why not just declare the place an outpost of Saudi Arabia and be done with the whole business.

“On 9-14-2012, Dearborn Fordson High School principal called the police on me for driving with 2 Israeli flags on my truck.

When the students began their assault he rolled down his window asking them to stop. After they pulled him over the police used the rolled down window as a pretext to accuse him of instigating the altercation.  While being questioned by the police in front of the high school the reader received death threats. The police denied hearing them though the individuals involved were only a few feet away.

“The Dearborn police were one car behind me when this student threw a bottle on my windshield. The police did not stop the student, but instead stopped me for 30 minutes asking me why I would display Israeli flags on my truck.”

This is how hellholes like Malmo get started. When the law becomes a tool for enforcing Muslim prejudices, then equal rights go out the window and police lecture anyone attacked by Muslims on what they did to provoke the attack.

But it’s not just Dearborn. The consensus of our governing elites is that making a movie mocking Mohammed is a crime that deserves to be punished. So why not driving with an Israeli flag as well? Where do we draw the line? Anywhere Muslim violence tells us to.”

Sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, people have to pick their battles. Thereby, not all incidents are fight-worthy. Thus, a litmus test must be drawn up, assessing whether or not ones energy is best expended here or there, or not at all.

Therefore, a patriot must ask: what liberties are being trampled upon by said actions, or lack thereof? Once answered, one has to also consider the true nature/mindset of said violators.

Now this blogger can state with 100% assurance what works, and what doesn’t, particularly when beating back Islamic supremacists. The main ingredients to remember are: NEVER show fear; NEVER back down; and NEVER give them an inch of your freedoms.

And make NO mistake, Dearbornistan is nearly completely ruled by Islamic mandates, even down to Shariah compliance – or else. 

Therefore, here’s a thought experiment: let us suppose (in the best case scenario) that a bus load of “good ole boys” (know this crowd quite well…but let us not digress) decides to take a scenic ride to Dearbornistan, simply to soak in some local culture/vibe. But in the midst of their travels they get off the bus; stretch their legs; hoist scores of American flags; recite a Christian prayer of choice; and finish off by reciting the Constitution.

Beautiful. It’s (still) a free country, isn’t it?

Taken a step further…meandering down the byways and highways…crowds of Islamists ( in the U.S.A. ! ) start threatening the aforementioned patriots, expecting they too will back down. Does anyone think that this would happen?


Imagine, if you will, a busload of patriots turning up at the latest anti-semitic/anti-Zionist hate fest, but this time nearby the Islamist-in-Chief’s ‘nabe – Would the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s attendees pause and take notice?

Not likely, unless put on notice: cease and desist.

To effectuate the above “wish list” scenarios, American patriots have to stop thinking like good neighbors, and start acting like guys from Middle America, taking a page out of the “good ole boy’s” playbooks.

ATTENTION: “rednecks/bitter clingers/lock and load” sorts – Islamists in “any town USA” need some old fashioned lessons, on what it means to be a patriotic American. Of course, give them a chance to back off their Islamic high horse, if not….

As leftists are wont to opine – FAIR IS FAIR.

First they came for the Saturday people…then the Sunday people.

Gunning For Tea Party Activists…Enlisting U.S. Army To Hunt/Identify Them…Addendum To: Warning All Patriotic Americans…The Enemy Is You…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The latest news should shock even the most jaded American patriots, but somehow the suspicion is it won’t. That ship has sailed.

This blog has brought forward a dastardly ‘people’s indictment’, against  the misuse/abuse of DHS, under the reign of the Thug-in-Chief. In fact, previous commentaries reveal the depth of their plans; targeted at those whose sole ‘crime’ is to believe in the Constitutional right to bear arms, and their vocal expressions of patriotic principles, an inherent right under any democracy.

Where do they think they are, in a banana republic? Are they mirroring Hugo’s goon squads…the dictator-in-chief…who mugged with the Radical-in-Chief on several occasions? You know, the same El Presidente that the POTUS called to congratulate on his latest electoral ‘win’.

In concert with the above factoids, the DHS is being used as a cover to effectuate political aims –

Most glaringly, patriotic Americans are subliminally tarred as ‘terrorists’ and a danger to the American way of life – really?

Topping off their anti-American plans, Black Hawks can be found swirling over many U.S. cities, at the same time that inordinate amounts of ammo are being purchased too. What for? –

Ironically, soldiers who openly express patriotic leanings are also in their cross hairs – Ungrateful bastards.

Thus, a rational question becomes – what’s the end game? Could it be that the disarming of the public, and the shredding of their Constitutional right to bear arms, is their goal? –

Alas, the above are just a mere sampling, but substantive linkages to their latest putsch against patriotic Americans!

‘Tea Party “Terrorists” Now On U.S. Army Kill List?’

OCTOBER 13, 2012 BY 

Tea Party SC Tea Party “Terrorists” now on U.S. Army kill list?

A retired Army colonel and a professor of history at the University of Kansas have co-written an article instructing the U.S. Army how to properly destroy “…extremist militia [insurgents] motivated by the goals of the ‘tea party’ movement.”

Colonel Kevin Benson, who teaches modern warfare to soldiers at the University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies at Ft. Leavenworth and Associate Professor Jennifer Weber have created a scenario in which activists under the influence of that apogee of American terrorism—Tea Party members—“…take over the government of Darlington, South Carolina, occupying City Hall, disbanding the city council, and placing the mayor under house arrest.”

How exactly do the authors explain such a thing happening?  “After a change in control of the White House and Congress in 2012, the governing party cuts off all funding that had been dedicated to boosting the economy or toward relief.” In short, those evil, rich Republicans have cruelly separated the American public from all of the “free” money and services Big Brother has provided over the past several decades. As a result, “a high-profile and vocal minority has directed the public’s fear and frustration at nonwhites and immigrants.” For as we all know, “after almost ten years of race-baiting and immigrant-bashing by right-wing demagogues, nearly one in five Americans reports being vehemently opposed to immigration, legal or illegal, and even U.S.-born nonwhites have become occasional targets for mobs of angry whites.”

Of course, Benson and Weber make it clear that “mainstream” Americans and politicians react quite negatively to the aggression of the radical right. The insurgents, however, “…invoke the Declaration of Independence and argue that the current form of the federal government is not deriving its ‘just powers from the consent of the governed’…” As a result, they are joined in their maniacal overthrow of the true government by “…other tea party groups, militias, racist organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, anti-immigrant associations such as the Minutemen, and other right-wing groups.”

The name of this extraordinary piece of work is “Full Spectrum Operations in the Homeland: A ‘Vision’ of the Future”. And needless to say, its publication has created something of a stir among rational, non-impaired thinkers across the nation. Most ask a very pointed question: Why are conservatives targeted as the coming threat to the social and political order of the United States rather than Islamic terrorists or members of the radical left? Shouldn’t those who have already proven themselves eager participants in the art of murder and insurrection be the first to command the attention of law enforcement, whether public or military?

Well not if we remember the published warnings of Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security. According to Janet Napolitano and her boss, the REAL danger emanates from the:

“Extreme right-wing: groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack and is either lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”

According to much of the Department’s description of would-be terrorists, this nation’s Founders would have been in real trouble with the Obama Regime!

Please take the time to read the 5 page, Full Spectrum article of Benson and Weber. It is a chilling reminder of just how important the November election really is.”

FULL DISCLOSURE: This American-Israeli takes particular umbrage at the targeting of the Tea Party…being a member ( in absentia ) and all. Not one to take threats lying down, thus, counting on fellow patriots to stay vigilant.

Whatever works.

Is The Leftist Media – More or Less – Having Buyer’s Remorse…Regarding ‘The One’? Adina Kutnicki

NEWSFLASH: Piercing the leftist narrative regarding ‘The One’. Newsweek columnist bares his buyer’s remorse…seeks to return the lemon he voted for.

Delicious. But most significantly…..

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal.The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the “protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CDA243.669064E0

“I Too Have Become Disillusioned.”

By Matt Patterson (Newsweek columnist – opinion writer)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world’s largest economy, direct the world’s most powerful military, execute the world’s most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama’s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a “community organizer;” a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote “present”); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama’s “spiritual mentor”; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama’s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass – held to a lower standard – because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) “non-threatening,” all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon – affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don’t care if these minority students fail; liberals aren’t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin – that’s affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn’t racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama’s oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people – conservatives included – ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that’s when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it’s all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008speeches)

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track.) But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.”

 Maybe pigs do fly!!





Hollywood Liberals & Their Cozy Left Wing Political Relationships: Protecting Islamic Interests…Huma Abedin ‘Plays’ Ben Affleck Like A Fiddle…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Just when you thought that the far left’s manipulations – on behalf of their Islamic overlords/censors – reached their highest level of complicity, along comes Ben Affleck and the opening of his thriller. ‘Argo’ is inarguably a historical hit job.

While his directorial oversight is worthy of good reviews, there is so much more here than meets the cinematic eye. Much more.

To understand the insidious symbiosis, between Hollywood and political elites,  (almost always operating from the left) one has to view them as incestuous relations between ideological cousins. Sticky and dangerous.

Think about all the “stories” you may have heard about the goings on among Appalachian kinfolk, and the above is so much worse. (BTW, this blogger knows some “good ole” boys from the “hollers”, and has only good things to say about them…salt of the earth…but never mind…) Better yet, take what you know about the ACTUAL inbreeding between Arab families/tribes and consider the actual results – rampant genetic mutations, and too many mental defects to list –

The above could very well (at least partially ) explain their non-quenchable inter-tribal warfare; family rivalry on steroids! Regardless, westerners are not responsible for the bedding patterns of much of the Arab world. It’s their internal garbage, which spills over into the wider world, which should concern us all. Yes, it should.

Now, separate out actual blood lines, but leave in its stead the main reason why Hollyweird’s limousine liberals do the bidding of their leftist political “cousins”.  One holds the keys to the access of authentic power levers; the other is courted for their ability to raise mega cash. A match made within the bowels of ideological incest, and with both gorging off the other – Dracula-like.

 As an aside, although Affleck publicly admits to his admiration for the “spook” community  (something which is verboten in far left circles…assisting the military industrial complex…and all that crap), he is oblivious – or complicit, it is hard to know – to the rewriting of history.

In plain parlance, the story he weaves re the motives of Islamic revolutionaries in Iran, during their historical takeover in 1979 and their attack on the American embassy ( shades of Libya…and the rewriting from the Islamist-in-Chief, not unlike his like-minded twin, Jimmy, the peanut farmer, Carter ) smacks of talking points from the other side.  Incredibly, instead of directing the viewers towards the heart of the matter – Islamic jihad on behalf of Allah – he uses a “video/cartoon” defense, sort of like a “twinkie” defense, or the “dog ate my homework”.

Gee whiz.

In the same mendacious manner, in which the Islamist-in-Chief (and his surrogates)  blamed American murders in Libya on a video ( which no one had seen! ), Affleck redirects the viewers to the Shah of Iran. To be sure, the Shah ruled with an iron grip, but at least Islamists were kept at bay, and his eyes were westward.

Mubarak redux.

At this grave juncture in history let’s stop pussyfooting around, lying to ourselves  (and the world ) that anyone but a ‘strongman’ can tame the Arab masses. It can’t be done.This is precisely why it is a fool’s errand to implant/import western democracy into the ever warring tribal lands of the Middle East. Come live in my ‘hood for a while, then see what (many) Israelis realize, even though some are loathe to admit it.

Besides, purple finger markings from casting ballots ( recall, the incessant tv images of Iraqis holding up purple fingers ) are hardly the main underpinnings of democracy. Democratic principles via foundational moorings, shored up by civil society constructs comes BEFORE voting.

Back to Affleck’s Argo.

Enter Huma Abedin, Deputy COS to Hillary Clinton, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia diva, featured so prominently at this blog. Don’t be surprised, she deserves her top billing status. Humala, nowhere to run…nowhere to hide, is as intertwined with the Muslim Brotherhood like a pig is to his shit, and a dog is to his fleas. That close. The details are here –

But, why is she being featured – yet again! –  and with Benny boy no less? Here’s the scoop & the poop – 

‘Ben Affleck: Huma Abedin a ‘close friend’ who was ‘instrumental’ in making of ‘Argo’

“Hollywood actor / director Ben Affleck premiered his new film – ‘Argo’ – in Washington, D.C. and in attendance was none other than Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Affleck revealed that the controversial figure had a hand in making the film.


Former Rep. Anthony Weiner and his wife, Huma Abedin, made an appearance at the D.C. premiere of “Argo” on Wednesday. The couple stopped by the screening after a reception for the film, which chronicles the Iran hostage crisis, at the Canadian Embassy.

A few years ago, Weiner advised Ben Affleck — the director and star of “Argo” – on his political role in “State of Play.” But it was actually Abedin, an aide to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who helped Affleck with this movie, the actor said.

“Huma is a really close friend of mine,” Affleck explained on the red carpet. “In fact, Huma — the reason why she’s here — is she wasinstrumental in helping us shoot the State Department. As you know, we shot at the real State Department. We never would have had any of that stuff in our research [otherwise]. …Huma was enormously helpful, and obviously we invited her and she brought her husband. I look forward to seeing him.”

The Daily Mail referred to Abedin’s influence on the film as one that involved giving Affleck ‘guidance on State Department protocol’.

Some might remember that a few months ago, the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank likened Abedin to a gopher for Hillary who picks out ‘handbags’.

MacLeans’ Savage Washington reported on a couple of other interesting figures who were in attendance:

CIA director David Petraeus was there, as well as Sen. Chris Dodd,Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, to name a few. Also in attendance were the usual assortment of former ambassadors and other Friends of Canada.

Earlier this year, we reported on Huma Abedin’s sister (Heba Abedin)contributing $2300 to the Chris Dodd Presidential campaign in 2007.

Heba and Huma served together for years on the Editorial Board of the Institute for Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA), which has significant connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

General Petraeus and Affleck appear to have developed a bit of a relationship during the making of the film.” – a good review here too from Pajamasmedia –

Does anyone, at least without mush for brains, believe that Abedin was front and center at his premier out of pure friendship? Of course not. As indicated above, she was his ADVISER on the film! Now, far be it to peddle conspiracy theories ( it is not as if there aren’t enough true horrors to angst over), but she is the Obama regime’s point woman, via the Islamist-bent State Department.

Pray tell, but why this theatrical gig?

Adding to the muck is the entrance of General Petreaus, current CIA Director, also front and center at the screening. Huh?

“MacLeans’ Savage Washington reported on a couple of other interesting figures who were in attendance:

CIA director David Petraeus was there, as well as Sen. Chris Dodd,Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, to name a few. Also in attendance were the usual assortment of former ambassadors and other Friends of Canada.”

What the hell is going on? Don’t leaders of the world’s super power have more important things to do, than preview the opening of Benny boy’s latest directorial flick? Is this blogger losing her mojo, or perhaps her mind, even considering such questions.

Mea culpa. Not.

And when one truly understands how deep the incest runs, between Hollywood’s left & their political handlers, their collusion becomes clear –

Does framing the narrative resonate? 

If ones antenna isn’t raised enough, consider the following ( out of a mega list ) encroachment of Islamic intimidation; this time aimed at a Mayor in Maine, courtesy of Obama’s surrogates.

Coincidence? Is the moon made of cream cheese?

‘Maine Mayor Under Fire for Telling Truth About Muslim Immigrants (VIDEO)’

Where will the above – and so much more – lead to? At the very least, the death kneel of western freedoms and an untold number of dead westerners. Its numbers will pale in comparison to the previous big wars – if westerners don’t start fighting back!
To be exact, the patriot’s struggle is twofold: against the bowed leadership, as well as the boot of Islam.There are NO easy answers, but there is NO other option, unless submission is your path of least resistance.
You still have a choice – at least for now.


Islamic Wildfires Coming Full Circle: To A U.S. Forest Near You. Addendum To : Jihad Via Arson…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those who ascribe good intentions to all humanity haven’t come in contact with the carnage of jihadists; handiwork of the Islamic devil.

Ignoring cultural differences is akin to living in a netherworld, whether imposed through outside pressures, or ones own internal ignorance. Either way, this rosy colored worldview pretends that evil is good; darkness is light; fantasy is reality; and everything in between is nothing more than shades of gray. PC insanity run amok, the rivers of blood notwithstanding.

How many westerners understand the depth of their plans to destroy us? How many have witnessed – at the very least on television – their beloved land torched by Islamic arsonists? This blogger has….and shouting at a tv screen can only work for so long!

There is something to be said for those who channel said outrage outwardly, attempting to turn the tables, thus blaring a HUGE spotlight on their tormentors.

In this regard, exposing their plans, as well as their carnage, is one such way to “even” the playing field, at least as a “war” cry to like-minded patriots. The following are some opening shots:

‘Jihad Via Arson…As Fires Rage…Proven Suspicious…’-, gives a window into their underbelly, revealing a new method to wage jihad against the west.

Therefore, it is imperative to ‘Repeat Until The Cows Come Home:There Is NO Moderate Islam’ –

As such, Northeast Intelligence Network catches the public up to speed too – ‘Wildfires: We’ve been warning about them since 2003’

3 October 2012:  Since 2003, the Northeast Intelligence Network has been warning that Islamic terrorists living in the United States and sympathetic to the objectives of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, have been posting instructions to destroy the U.S. from within. A “simple” and inexpensive way to cause great and costly calamities to the U.S. is by setting forest fires, especially in drought-ravaged areas. In May 2003, we reported that postings appeared on several password-protected forums that the California wildfires were started by members of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.  An FBI memo published in June 2003 carried identical warnings.

Following those warnings, we reported that “verified intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists had a hand in some of the existing fires in southern California that have already engulfed over 1/2 million acres.”

In May 2003, we reported that postings appeared on several password-protected forums that the California wildfires were started by members of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood.  An FBI memo published in June 2003 carried identical warnings.

Following those warnings, we reported that “verified intelligence indicates that Islamic terrorists had a hand in some of the existing fires in southern California that have already engulfed over 1/2 million acres.”

Saturday, 12 July 2003: PHOENIX, Arizona  – The FBI  alerted law enforcement agencies last month that an Al Qaeda terrorist now in detention had talked of masterminding a plot to set a series of devastating forest fires around the western United States. Source: Fox News.

Internet Intercept 26 October 2003:

“Allah’s soldiers will devastate America by its burning…this is nothing but the start of the punishment assisted by Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds….These are the new fires different from the normal as Ramadan starts.”

Other truncated messages from September 2003:

Oh Allah support the fighters everywhere, and hasten your support of them Oh Allah… Oh Allah… ignite the land a fire from below the feet of the Crusaders and cunning Zionists… Our warnings continued through 2010, at which time it appeared that the Department of Homeland Security would have had enough intelligence gathered on the plans of Muslim terror suspects living here in the U.S. Today, al Qaeda is being blamed for Europe-wide forest fires, as the head of Russia’s Federal Security Service claimed they were set by arsonists as part of the group’s low-cost attack strategy.”

Previous reports: 11 February 2009: Terrorist “chatter:” Forest Fires 26 October 2007:  Photography, surveillance, FBI warnings preceded California wildfires 25 October 2007:  Domestic Terrorism? California arson fires easier than hijacking planes

At the end of this death dance, between the west and Islamic barbarians, one will come out the winner, therefore, the other side will naturally have to surrender/submit.

So the basic questions for the west are: what methods are they willing to utilize in order to protect their way of life, both inside and outside their borders? How far are they willing to go to implement said safeguards?

In other words, are westerners willing to round up the enemy within – those who are of the same bent as the arsonists ( think: Dearbornistan, then onto Islamberg, and on and on…) – knowing full well that the international community will scream foul? 

Cards on the table.

Westerners who cherish life and liberty must decide: what (temporary) lines, however uncomfortable, are they willing to cross to serve their national interests? Is going down in flames     (LITERALLY) a price they are willing to pay, in order to take the “high road”?

The answers should be clear. NO guilt allowed, at least at this blog. War is hell and nice guys finish last!

Need a rallying cry? Crank it up  –

The Liar-In-Chief…& His Many Tall Tells…End Game : Purposefully Tearing The U.S. From Its Constitutional Roots…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

There is a world of difference between individuals who engage in “white lies”  (though an attempt to suppress the urge is a laudable goal), and people who habitually tell tall tales. 

Besides, is there anyone who hasn’t told their loved one ( especially men to their wives/girlfriends ) that they look good in this or that, preferring not to insult their feelings? Personally, would rather be told the truth before heading out in public – only suffering momentary embarrassment – but many prefer to see what they want to see. As is said, different strokes for different folks; beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and really only skin deep.

Be that as it may, in relation to the leader of the free world, there is NO higher commodity – when electing a leader – than their ability to tell the truth. This dare not be confused with leaking national secrets (and most conveniently), sacrificed on the altar of “transparency”. The POTUS has a penchant for such “truth telling”, and he is aided and abetted by media lapdogs. A perversion of truth and patriotism…traits wholly absent in the Obama regime.

Tragic….and herein lies the crux. This blog is rife with supportive evidence which attests to the Radical-in-Chief’s inability to relate to – thereby value – truthfulness. Character? What’s that? Moral compass? Just for chumps.  

Starting with his “down low” lifestyle; coupled with his revolutionary friendships, from knee high to a grasshopper; exhibited through his 4 year wreckage of “transformation and change”; few can argue that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is anything, but an anti-American fraud – An exceedingly dangerous man.

So, atop the wreckage already visible, more keeps piling up. Does this Poser-in-Chief even know how to step off his merry-go-round of lies, even if the situation warrants him to? Have no idea. Regardless, he can spin, weave, bob and dodge – like liars always do – but many are hot on his trail, thanks to fellow bloggers and alternative media types. Enter…the latest charge sheets:

Still believe Obama got Osama ? Think again – The following are some more fact checks exposing the Liar-in-Chief:



“Suspicion about the federal government’s September jobs report has fallen on Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, who appeared on CNBC this morning and defended the numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), claiming–falsely–that upward revisions of 86,000 jobs were from the private sector. In fact, the new number is entirely accounted for by upwards revisions to state and federal government payrolls.

The BLS reported that while only 114,000 jobs were created in September–which would have translated into a rise in unemployment from 8.1% to 8.2%–the unemployment rate fell dramatically to 7.8%. That unusual drop is the fastest in nearly three decades, and was unexpected even in the rosiest predictions. One reason for the rise was an upward revision of 86,000 to the July and August jobs numbers–all of which came from a 91,000 increase in the estimate of public sector jobs. Private sector job estimates were actually revised downward by 5,000. In addition, the BLS reported a large rise in the number of part-time jobs, adding 600,000 jobs to the total–a dramatic increase of 7.5%, not explained by any other economic indicators–and raising questions about whether the government had changed the way it counted part-time workers. Solis was adamant today in defending both the revisions and the BLS’s methodology for counting part-time workers–relying largely on the upwards revisions for July and August jobs (emphasis added):

CNBC: We’re getting bombarded by people who do not believe the number. They believe this number was fixed and typed to coincide with Election Day. What do you say to them?…I’ll rephrase the question. A lot of people do not believe the 7.8 number. They believe that somehow BLS fixed this to coincide with the election cycle. What is labor’s response? Solis: You know, I’m insulted when I hear that because we have a very professional, civil service organization where you have top, top economists that work at the BLS. They’ve been doing these calculations. These are — these are our best trained and best-skilled individuals working in the BLS, and it’s really ludicrous to hear that kind of statement, and I say that because just look at the — we have to look at what happens across the board, not just in one month, but look what happened in the last two months. We also saw revisions there upwards of 86,000 additional jobs added and this brings us now to 5.2 million private sector jobs across the board, we saw 104 private sector jobs created…. CNBC: Before I let you go, you say skepticism over the numbers are ludicrous. You say you’re insulted. Is there a danger, you believe, when large sections was country don’t believe the data. Not that it’s ever been considered gospel, but when you have disbelief how much danger is embedded in that? Solis: I will tell you that we look at each report differently. We just saw revisions for the last two months and this happens. I mean, these are estimates that obviously, the BLS puts out. They do the best calculation, using the best measurements and tools and we’ve been using them for the past 70 years. We haven’t changed anything and the information that I received is given to me by our professional, civil service staff in the BLS.

Note that Solis describes the 86,000 upward revision as if it were an increase in private sector jobs, though in fact the increase came entirely from revisions to public sector payrolls by cash-strapped federal and state governments. Instead of shedding jobs, as previously claimed, governments have been adding jobs.” –

This too via Canada Free Press, re the fudging of the numbers- 

‘Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS & Parkinson’s Law’ –

Knowing a thing or two about what happens to regular folks who cook their financial books ( see ), and the iron fist brought down by the IRS when caught ( except, if one supports Islamic or leftist causes, but let’s not digress… ), what should be the penalty for the most lawbreaking regime in U.S. history? 

Let the citizens decide.

NOT only that, but the same lawbreakers who trot out the Sec of Labor to tell financial tall tales, are the same deviants who abuse the weight of the IRS for their personal vendettas – see – WND EXCLUSIVE -‘COLUMBIA CLASSMATE: OBAMA USING IRS TO PUNISH ME’ – Outspoken 2008 VP candidate claims prez trying to ‘silence critics’ –

Moreover, with all the lies swirling around the Thief-in-Chief, and his most recent miraculous job numbers, one can be forgiven if  ‘PaytoPlay’ – Chicago’s own version of a “political mafia” – got lost in the shuffle. Have no fear. There are those who keep abreast.

‘Hugo Floriani, Investigative Reporter, Illinois PaytoPlay’

“Previous Illinois PaytoPlay (IP2P) articles have proposed that the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO), once led by former U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald, timed the arrest of former Governor Rod “Blago” Blagojevich in order to prevent persons representing Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. from paying a bribe to Blago in exchange for Blago appointing J.J., Jr. as the new U.S. Senator for the seat vacated by recently-elected President Barack Obama.

A recent article in World Net Daily, written by best-selling author Jerome Corsi entitled “Jesse Jackson, Wright ‘arranged’ Obama marriage,” adds credibility to what IP2P has alleged; namely,that the timing of Blago’s arrest was not motivated by a desire to stop a “crime spree,” but was meant to save J.J., Jr., from being complicit in the crime associated with purchasing a Senate seat. The primary assertion of Corsi’s article is this: “As a young single woman, Michelle Robinson was a fixture in the home of civil rights leader Jesse Jackson, who along with Rev. Jeremiah Wright ‘arranged’ her marriage to Barack Obama, according to sources in Chicago who know the couple. ‘If you want to understand Michelle Obama, you’ve got to go back to Jesse Jackson, a woman called “Robyn” for this article told WND. Robyn, who spent several years working for Jackson’s Rainbow PUSH Coalition, explained to a WND investigator in Chicago that Michelle Obama ‘just about grew up in Jesse Jackson’s home.’ ‘Jesse should have charged her rent and board for the amount of time she spent in his home instead of her own,’ she said.”

This article is the second in a series. In the first installment, Corsi claimed that Obama was part of an “underground subculture in the black community known as Down Low, comprised largely of men who secretly engage in homosexual activity while living ‘straight’ lives in public.”  And, that Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church was a facilitation center for this underground subculture.

Putting that assertion aside, the close relationship between Michelle Robinson and the Jackson family adds weight to IP2P’s suggestion that the newly elected President would have taken all necessary steps to protect J.J., Jr., who was not only the Co-Chair of his Presidential Campaign Committee, but also a member of a family with a long and close personal relationship with Michelle Obama.

Then there’s also the possibility that J.J., Jr. would be knowledgeable of Barack Obama’s alleged involvement in the “Down Low” community.”

Oh no…the “down low” saga keeps bubbling to the fore. Can’t keep the truth from rearing its ugly head. Sick and tired…of being sick and tired? Not done yet.

Do you recall this commentary on “Uncle Frank”, and his noteworthy influence on the Prez? No worries. Here’s a recap –

Onto “The One’s” latest shenanigans…


“You might recall TheBlaze’s series of reports on Dr. Paul Kengor’s powerful book, “The Communist,” which offered a detailed account of the Communist Party ties of President Obama’s longtime mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.

“Frank,” as he is referred to in Obama’s memoir “Dreams From My Father,” is mentioned multiple times in the print edition of the president’s book, however, Kengor now reveals that all references to “Frank” were purged from the volume’s abridged audio version. It’s an observation that was first broached, albeit very briefly, by Jack Cashill in a July article. And since then, the scrubbing has gone unnoticed.

Until now. “Frank” — whose influence Kengor asserts was key to the fledgling politician and that the eccentric activist appears in “each mile-marker” of Obama’s path from Hawaii to the halls of Washington, D.C. — is mentioned no less than 22 times by name in “Dreams From My Father” and is referenced via pronouns numerous other times throughout the book. But while listening to the audio version recently, Kengor noticed “Frank” had disappeared. He re-listened to the entire audio book on Tuesday afternoon and compared it to the unabridged memoir. “Every reference to ‘Frank’ everywhere in the book, from every section—and there are many of them—are gone,” Kengor told TheBlaze in an email. The omissions are important because a review of the Random House website reveals that all audio versions of “Dreams,” along with Obama’s subsequent book, “The Audacity of Hope,” are only available in the abridged format.

While the Obama campaign could certainly argue that during the editing process many excerpts, not just the ones referencing Frank, were eliminated from the audio version for brevity, some might find it odd that such an important figure in the president’s life would have been relegated to the cutting room floor. It is also important to note that the audio version of “Dreams” was released in 2005, shortly after Obama’s now-infamous 2004 speech at the Democratic National Convention — a speech which made it fairly clear that the aspiring politician would indeed rise to prominence on the national stage one day.

Back in 1994, when the original text version of “Dreams” was released, Obama was a relative “nobody,” hence his memoir, complete with references to a seemingly obscure character named “Frank” would hardly have been on the public’s radar. Given that the president himself narrated the audio version of “Dreams,” approved the final edits and even won a Grammy award for his efforts leaves little room for doubt that Obama is aware, if not directly responsible, for the omissions.

In turn, the fact that the audio book appears to have been sanitized of the myriad references to Obama’s controversial mentor strikes Kengor as being in no way coincidental. “It’s amazing to read along the text as you listen to the audio, and see and hear everything word for word, paragraph after paragraph, line after line, page after page, and then suddenly—wham, boom!—it skips a paragraph or line or page that just happened to mention “Frank” in the original,” Kengor added. It’s almost creepy, chilling to see……..”….read the whole thing…once upon a (book’s) time there was an “Uncle Frank”….and suddenly…erased. Beyond creepy.

Whoppers are fungible, until they no longer are. They always have a way of ensnaring the culprits, but not always in time to save the victims. In this regard, the Liar-in-Chief is running the biggest criminal enterprise in U.S. history. Way past time to uproot him and his (all too eager) surrogates.

Revenge never smelled so sweet.

The Islamist-in-Chief Helped Install Morsi…The Muslim Brotherhood’s Point Man For Egypt…1 + 1 = 2…Addendum To: White House Mandates Aid To Morsi…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The leader of the free world is expected to know the overall outlook of those backed by his administration. If not, surely he is less competent than average college graduates, or even intelligent high schoolers.

Besides, the paper trail leading from Egypt’s Prez Morsi, to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, is vast. Much of it is discussed at this blog, and illustrated within ‘White House Mandates Aid To Morsi’s Islamist Egypt…In The Best Interests Of The U.S.’ –

But for those who prefer less wordy explanations, the following will do the trick:

‘Egypt’s Brotherhood heads urged jihad for Jerusalem’
Members of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood including now-President Mohamed Morsi (3rdL) take part in a press conference in 2011. The supreme guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, from which Morsi emanated, called on Thursday for a jihad (holy war) to liberate Jerusalem from Israeli rule.

“Members of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood including now-President Mohamed Morsi (3rdL) take part in a press conference in 2011. The supreme guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, from which Morsi emanated, called on Thursday for a jihad (holy war) to liberate Jerusalem from Israeli rule.

AFP – The supreme guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, from which Egypt’s President Mohamed Morsi emanated, called on Thursday for a jihad (holy war) to liberate Jerusalem from Israeli rule.

“Jerusalem is Islamic … and nobody is entitled to make concessions” on the Holy City, said Sheikh Mohammed Badie in his weekly message to supporters.

“The jihad for the recovery of Jerusalem is a duty for all Muslims,” he said, stressing that the liberation of the Holy City “will not be done through negotiations or at the United Nations.”

Israel, which signed a peace treaty with Egypt in 1979, has watched with concern as Islamists were catapulted to the forefront of politics following a popular uprising that toppled president Hosni Mubarak last year.

Morsi has repeatedly said he would respect international treaties signed by Cairo. But his former movement has also said there is room to revise the accords, without objecting to them in principle.”

Ladies and gents, the blessings of pictorials and their irrefutable/indelible markings; demonstrating what this blogger has been hammering home at every turn.

Morsi = Muslim Brotherhood Mafia + Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fealty to their message/vision.

In other words, whichever way he twists, turns, bobs, spins and weaves, the conclusion is clear – the Islamist-in-Chief replaced Hosni Mubarak (hardly a ‘prefect’ democrat, but he kept the Islamists at bay, thereby, shored up western interests) in order to install a virulent Islamist organization, whose eyes are set upon Jerusalem first, but Washington second.

Now, by picking ‘this horse’, whose side is Barack HUSSEIN Obama on?

UPDATE: looks like Diana West agrees with this blogger’s assessment…re Obama & cohorts…purposefully allowing the Islamic wolves into the body politic –

Calling For An Islamic Reformation…Via Strong American Leadership…& Cold War Messaging…& Why Excellence & Morals Matter…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Academics are a dime a dozen, and some are rightfully termed (by this blogger) “wacademics”. Not unlike every discipline, some stand head and shoulders above the rest, thereby, establishing themselves as experts among said scholars.

Many of the readership are duly aware of the deep respect shown towards Professor Paul Eidelberg. Few measure up, aside from Dr. Martin Sherman and Professor Louis Rene Beres.

Specifically, Professor Eidleberg understands how to integrate dry scholarship with realities on the ground. Moreover, he is capable of interfacing other disciplines – history, religion and even literature –  into conceptual critical thinking. Multidisciplinary approaches to problem solving, applying them to (seemingly) intractable world problems, is his signature.  A feat of magic….evidenced through the depth and breath of his broad based scholarship.

Previously, the readership gleaned his incisive acumen through several commentaries. Most significantly, his groundbreaking policy paper, Islam & Blood, is a MUST read –

In a similar vein, the following are two requisite readings:

‘Needed: A Voice of America and a Video Counterpart’

Prof. Paul Eidelberg, President ‘The Israel-America Renaissance Institute’ Jerusalem & Philadelphia –

“Can it be that Islam is in its death throes? This can make Islam more dangerous than ever.

Nevertheless, if America relegates Obama to the political wilderness, the U.S. should go on the ideological offensive against Islam as it did when it inaugurated the Voice of America (VOA) and beamed its radio programs into Russia and the communist-dominated states of Eastern Europe.

The mere fact that Muslims are trying to stifle all criticism of Islam is indicative of a religion whose leaders are losing, if they haven’t already lost, solid confidence in the veracity of this bellicose ideology and of its hold over the Muslim masses.

A new and confident American leadership should not be deceived or deterred by Islam’s reputed monotheism, which in truth is a political ideology that uses monotheism as a veneer to win recruits to the anything but rational and humane tenets of the Quran. (The cunning leaders of Rome also used the gods to extend their power over ignorant masses. The Roman Empire was a theopolitical tyranny. It eventually succumbed to a new theology, Christianity, which destroyed the Roman polytheism.)

The lesson is clear. With the ascendancy of Internet, the United States should broadcast, on land and on sea, a Voice of America and its video counterpart to the Islamic world. The “Voice and Video of America” should expose the backwardness and cruelties conspicuous throughout the Islamic world.

It should contrast the respectful treatment of women in the Judeo-Christian world with the inhumane treatment of women in the Islamic world. The “Voice and Video of America” should point out that the despotic character of every Islamic state violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

It should emphasize the fact that Islamic discrimination and hostility toward non-Muslims is a form of racism no less evil than the racism practiced by South Africa against Blacks. Islamic racism should render Islamic states liable to expulsion from the United Nations—the fate of South Africa. It’s important to bear in mind that Islam’s effort to stifle freedom speech is motivated not by offended religious sensibilities so much as by fear—a fear that criticism of Islam will undermine the power structure of Islamic states. Freedom of speech via worldwide criticism of Islam will be more effective in the long run than economic sanctions and military action.

Epilogue :
(1) Our most powerful weapon is the Truth, which means Islam must be exposed as a world-historical and murderous fraud. Truth is what Muslim leaders fear most, which is why they want to stifle freedom of speech.  All the more reason to go all out and bury them in freedom of speech, by exposing the savagery which the great fourteenth-century Ibn Khaldun attributed to Arab-Islamic culture, a savagery we ourselves so clearly witnessed since 9/11.
(2) However, if such exposure does not cause Islam to implode before Iran has nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles, then the mortal enemy of Judeo-Christian civilization must be eviscerated. We must stop indulging in words and design a war-strategy designed to disarm Islam—and not only in the physical sense of the term.  We are embroiled in a total war, the only candid meaning of what polite gentlemen like Bernard Lewis and Samuel Huntington called a “clash of civilizations.”
More from the master….as he dissects Mitt from Obama….a twofer –
On Being “Balanced”
Prof. Paul Eidelberg
“As a patriotic American who has studied and written extensively on America’s brilliant Founding Fathers, it was not the least bit difficult for me to cast my presidential ballot for Governor.
Not that I deem Romney a great statesman, but how could I possibly vote for a fool—and a not very American fool— like Barack Obama? Indeed, it’s difficult for me to accept without criticism how the media can be “balanced” in its coverage of Romney and a schlemiel like Obama.
Admittedly, Romney is a far throw from a George Washington or an Abraham Lincoln. But how can you be “balanced” vis-à-vis the two men now vying to become President of the United States of America? Obama, with or without his teleprompter, strikes me as an “affirmative action” president.  How else could he have been admitted to Harvard and the University of Chicago? Unless their admission standards have fallen precipitously, his entry into these universities had nothing to do with his intellectual qualifications.
No less disturbing is his pejorative statements about America. Obama seems to be animated by a leveling hatred of meritocracy—the meritocracy Albert Einstein attributed to America when he arrived in New York back in 1920.
Yes, as recent quantitative studies indicate, America’s Founding Fathers were far more influenced by the Biblical ideas and moral values that adorned the curriculum of eighteenth-century Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and what was later called Princeton, than by the secular ideas of Enlightenment manifested in the writings of Locke, Hume, and Montesquieu.
Indeed, Harvard and Yale, influenced by the Puritans and Calvinism, abhorred the materialism and skepticism of the Enlightenment, as may be seen in the writings of James Wilson, perhaps the most learned and, next to Madison, the most significant architect of the America Constitution.
Thanks to the countervailing influence of the Bible vis-à-vis British and European philosophers, and bearing in mind the extraordinary influence of George Washington and Alexander Hamilton’s on the first eight years of the new American government, it is hardly an exaggeration to say that these founders conceived of the American democracy as a democratic aristocracy.
But let’s talk about being “balanced.” How are you going to be balanced between the “good” and the “bad,” between the “competent” and the “incompetent”? How are you going to be balanced between a politician like Romney who loves and admires “America” as opposed to a politician like Obama who disparages America’s foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution?
By his own mindless boast of being a “cosmopolitan,” Obama is a “man without a country.” He has rightly been called America’s first multicultural president, a person steeped in moral relativism. How nicely “balanced” are his moral and cultural values!
Well, it’s not difficult for a man without a country to be a multicultural moral relativist, especially today when so many college or university professors luxuriate as multicultural moral relativists, sheltered academics who like to appear intellectually superior to the unwashed multitude. Intellectual conceit and moral obscurantism are the staples of academia in post-modern America. This is why Obama is a favorite among half-educated journalists who would give equal time to Socrates and a Sophist.
This is being “balanced” or “even-handed”—as are so many diplomats dealing with the conflict between the Jews of Israel and the Muslims of the Palestinian Authority. Did I say “even-handed”? Can you be even-handed between good and evil without undermining morality, hence the good?
Alas, this is a subject that diminishes the distance between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, because all attempts to dissolve the conflict between the Jews of Israel and their “Palestinian” enemies has dignified the latter and dishonored the former. Excuse me for my lack of “balance.”
Of course, there are occasions when balance can be a virtue. But Washington chose Revolution to “balance,” and Lincoln preferred Civil War to “balance.” In politics you often find schlemiels across the political spectrum. But today we need a Washington or a Lincoln, not a schlemiel like Obama; and for any journalist to be so “balanced” as to obscure Obama’s mental inferiority is tantamount to being a propagandist. But isn’t this a sad reflection on what has become of American democracy, in contrast to what I said above regarding the vision of America’s Founding Fathers?”
The above is a “renaissance man’s” approach to a life and death struggle – a “clash of civilizations”. 
We need to honestly assess : is there a statesman capable of meeting the above challenges and prescriptive changes? If so, will he lead the charge; grab the mantle; save freedom and liberty; and encourage others to jump on board?
Western civilization is reaching critical mass…hanging in the balance.

VIDEO EXPOSES…The Thug-in-Chief & His Goon Squads…No Less Than Six Degrees Of Separation…Adina Kutnicki

Tell this blogger who your friends/supporters are, and she will tell you – more or less – who you are. As is said, the company one keeps tells the tale, whether flattering or not.

In fact, there is a poem, in all its simplicity, which brings this most salient message to the fore, and here it is:

‘Judged by the Company One Keeps’

One night in late October,
When I was far from sober,
Returning with my load with manly pride,
My feet began to stutter,
So I lay down in the gutter,
And a pig came near and lay down by my side;
A lady passing by was heard to say,
‘You can tell a man who boozes,
By the company he chooses, ‘
And the pig got up and slowly walked away.”

Truer words rarely written.

With the above in mind, take a peek at those who choose to support Barack HUSSEIN Obama, bearing in mind his radical, revolutionary, leftist background.

‘Obama Supporters: Vandals And Thieves’ – embedded video within

“WARNING: graphic content! Watch Obama supporters “gone wild” with attempts to silence speech; to steal, vandalize, deface, and destroy conservative political signs; and to intimidate through violent, aggressive behavior. The party of bumper sticker “tolerance” and “co-exist” mantras reveals its true nature in this shocking expose.”

Now, does the above reconcile with the following blog commentaries: ‘What Happens When Authentic Revolutionaries Hold The Reins Of American Power Centers?’ –,

As well as, ‘If It Looks Like A Socialist, Marxist, Communist Plan…It Is…’ –

It bears repeating – the company one keeps, whether at arms length or close by, is evidence of ones worldview. 

NOT unlike drunks…zombies too…Obama’s radical helpers hope to bring the U.S. to its knees. Nevertheless, voters will soon be the judge, and history will judge them likewise for their efforts!

The Islamist-in-Chief & His Kenyan Wahhabi Relatives…Obama’s Inner Roots…Addendum To: The Ties That Bind The Islamist-in-Chief To Sunni Islam…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

How many people have relatives they would rather avoid, or even wish would just stay hidden behind closed doors? Too many. And how many of those relatives are threats (mental or physical…substance abusers come to mind) to themselves and others? Enough. But how many can say that their relatives are acting against the interests of the United States and by extension the west? Not too many. (except if one is an Islamic at heart…living under the protection of western freedoms…but up to no good) Most intrinsically, how many of us have the same clout as the Islamist-in-Chief, thus extending down to select wayward relatives? None.

Herein lies the ties that bind Barack HUSSEIN Obama to his Islamist roots, even if one believes that Obama Sr was not his birth papa. The fact of the matter is that he bonded with his Kenyan narrative, and was raised in Indonesia for his formative years – rooted in his consciousness.

In this regard, a recent commentary should be used as a primer – ‘The Ties That Bind The Islamist-in-Chief…To Sunni Islam’ –

Onto the MAIN event, courtesy of Walid Shoebat & his dogged digging…

‘The Obamas’ Wahhabist Fundraising Empire: Obama’s First Cousin Spills The Beans (on video)’

by  on OCTOBER 10, 2012 in BLOGGENERAL

By Walid and Theodore Shoebat

Click here to see Musa Obama’s extremely revealing interview. (don’t miss this…)

While Obama’s connection to his Muslim family in Kenya is an acceptable topic for discussion in the Arab world, it is viewed as a ‘great taboo’ in the United States.

Why is that so? This ‘taboo’ should be considered unfair at best, purely prejudiced at worst. Is it fair that we censor such discussions just because Obama’s relatives are ‘Muslim’?

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) should condemn the media for keeping a tight lid on the subject. Isn’t it time to go beyond what is disclosed by President Obama in his Dreams from My Father or Wikipedia’s limited information, which includes the only photo released by the Obama family?

We will cover only three of the closest Kenyan relatives to president Obama:

1. Sarah, Barack’s beloved and benevolent grandmother
2. Sayid Obama, his closest favorite uncle
3. Musa Ismail Obama, his first cousin and Sayid’s main sidekick.

After President Obama was inaugurated, the Muslim side of the Obama family in Kenya boomed; it went from rags to riches overnight. They became one of the most influential families in western Kenya and even extended their sphere of influence to Saudi Arabia. When Sarah, president Obama’s grandmother (step-grandmother), decided to go to the Hajj, an obligatory pilgrimage to Mecca with Musa, president Obama’s first cousin, they were welcomed with open arms and were provided a special escort with full security detail and first-class treatment at the Saudi royal court:

His Royal Highness Prince Mamdouh bin Abdul Aziz accompanied the family of U.S. President Barack Obama in his palace in Jeddah after the performance of the Hajj this year. The event was attended by His Royal Highness Prince Faisal bin Thamer bin Abdul Aziz, and His Royal Highness Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Mamdouh Bin Abdul Aziz, and his HRH Prince Abdullah bin Nayef bin Abdul Aziz, and a number of other princes and officials.

The reason for such treatment—as explained in an exclusive interview with Musa Ismail Obama on Al-Jazeera—is that a close relationship was built with Saudi royals. Like president Obama’s call for education in the United States, the Kenyan Obamas embarked on a similar project.

President Obama’s grandmother Sarah started the Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund Institute, otherwise known as the Mama Sarah Obama Children Foundation, which raises 90% of its monies primarily from donors in the United States and some from Europe. Those monies are solicited as humanitarian aid and according to the website…

…to make a lasting impact on the lives of the orphans and underprivileged children by improving their housing, their education, their upbringing (which) continued to weigh heavily on Mama Sarah.

All this and…

…to help the neglected HIV/AIDS infected and affected in Kogelo village by linking them to care-givers and professional health services providers.

(Barack Obama with step-grandmother Sarah)

That’s what we’re told but when one peruses the foundation’s real activities in Arabic, it reveals a very dark side to the family’s efforts.

Musa Ismail Obama, the president’s cousin—in an exclusive interview with Al-Jazeera TV—explained all the troublesome detail, which does not bode well when translated into English: the bulk of the Sarah Fund as it turns out sends little to widows and orphans while the rest goes towards giving free scholarships to studying Sharia at the most influential Wahhabist centers in Saudi Arabia.

In the shocking interview, Musa was asked about his communications with cousin Barack, the president of the United States. The soft-spoken Musa explained that the President’s preferred method of communications was through one chosen conduit that relays messages back and forth with the family in Kenya by going through Uncle Sayid Hussein Obama. This is the man who was in attendance with Mama Sarah at Barack Obama’s inauguration in 2009.

(Mama Sarah begins her trip to see Barack inaugurated)

Musa, Sayid’s sidekick and the public promoter of Mama Sarah’s non-profit became the family’s key advertiser to the social efforts in Kenya. He selects specific Arab media asking wealthy audiences for help, but mandates as a prerequisite that no questions are asked regarding any details of such communications with president Obama or the delving into any political views. Yet, he tells just enough to connect the dots to the wealthy Arab audience of Al-Jazeera. He relays the message to raise all necessary funds since his mission is to transform Kenya to an Islamic majority by using the Obama household name and his grandmother’s non-profit organization.

The fund has little to do with secular education or the care for widows and orphans. It never once mentions anything in any Arabic media in regards to helping the HIV infected. The bulk of the Sarah’s benevolence fund, as Musa explained, goes toward scholarships destined for Saudi Arabia’s most virulent Wahhabi Sharia centers—the Islamic University in Medina, Umm Al-Qura University in Makkah and the University of Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh.

The counter-Wahhabist Muslim moderate think tank, the Gulf Issues Centre For Strategic Studies describes these institutions as “Salafi schools, which imbibed radical ideas” and are “the spring of Wahhabism”:

“[Wahhabists] grew up in the Wahhabi and Salafi schools which imbibed radical ideas in the Islamic University in Medina, Umm Al-Qura University in Makkah, and the University of Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh. (see essay, The Role of Wahhbist Movements, under a section entitled The Circle of Violence)

Musa expresses in classical Arabic how he memorized the entire Quran and how he graduated to become an Islamic scholar on Sharia from the Islamic University in Medina.

“I studied Arabic and Sharia at the Islamic university in Medina in Saudi Arabia,” exclaimed Musa while explaining his visit to Umm Al Qura University with his uncle Sayid: “In the month of Muharram we visited the dean of Umm Al Qura University, me and my uncle Sayid,” he told Al-Jazeera during the interview.

“The nature of the visit,” Musa explains, “was to facilitate scholarship to send students to Umm Al Qura.”

Umm Al Qura University has a heritage that includes being one of Saudi Arabia’s historical and national monuments. A paragon of Wahhabist education, it takes pride that the university was the first to print the works of Muhammad Abdul Wahhab, the founder of the most virulent brand of Islam—Wahhabism. The history of its Wahhabist connections can be seen [here].

On a cover-page of one of Wahhab’s collections from Umm Al Qura University, one can clearly see in fanciful Arabic calligraphy, the title, “Writings of Muhammad Abdul Wahhab” and a stamp that says “A gift from Umm Al Qura University-Mecca” is clearly visible.

In The Danger of Wahhabism in The Muslim World, by moderate Dr. Ahmed Abdul Rahim Al-Sayeh, who abandoned the teachings, he reflects on his studies at Umm Al Qura:

I studied Wahhabism, I studied their curriculum at the University of Umm Al Qura…

At Umm Al Qura University, Musa and Sayid Obama—president Obama’s favorite uncle—are seen in photo-ops and were described by several Arab media sources as diligent workers in advancing scholarships for Kenyans to study Sharia, courtesy of Sarah’s fund.

(Sayid Obama on far right standing with Musa Ismail Obama at Umm Al Qura University)

(On right: Director of Umm Al-Qura University, Dr. Bakri bin Ma’touk A’sas, Musa Ismail Obama on left next to Sayid Obama)

(On left – Sayid Obama)

Meetings of President Obama’s favorite uncle Sayid can even be seen at the official website of Umm Al Qura University where it proudly states:

His Highness the Director of Umm Al-Qura University, Dr. Bakri bin Ma’touk A’sas received at his office in university city at Babidah Mr. Sayid Obama the uncle of His Excellency the President of the United States of America Barack Obama and Mr. Musa Ismail Obama the cousin of U.S. President…

“When they [the students] submit an application to Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund, they expect to get what they want but we are flooded,” explains Musa.

As a result of the flood of students into the Wahhabi Sharia universities in Saudi Arabia, the interviewer then asks regarding the excess: “So you are opening an avenue in other universities?” Musa then explains he had to send the excess to nearby Doha in Qatar, where he visited and arranged everything.

When Al-Jazeera asked, “Do all these scholarships involve studying Arabic and Sharia?” Musa explained, “Some of those do not involve Sharia, like medicine or engineering.” Al-Jazeera then asks, “…but the majority involves what?” Musa answers: “Uuuhhh…. The majority of course is Sharia schools,” adding, “because my connection to the institutions is with Sharia schools.”

In what seems like a prepared script, Musa reads what he considers the catastrophe of Kenya, the lack of the process of proselytization, which goes hand-in-hand with Saudi interests seeking help from wealthy Saudis to transform Kenya into a Muslim majority.

This goal is also expressed by Al-Arab Newspaper, which covered the call of the Obamas in an interview with Musa Ismail Obama on the sidelines of the inauguration ceremony of World University Ruff in Nairobi [photo here].

Under the title, “Scholars in Kenya Call Their Brethren to Spread Islam and Teach Arabic” it states: “Muslims [in Kenya] suffer from the monumental Christianization aided by Zionist expansionism that infiltrates the nation.” (Muhammad Lasheeb, Al-Arab Newspaper, 8816th edition, published on August 1st, 2012)

(Photo above of Musa on Al-Arab Newspaper)

Al-Arab Newspaper expounds on the effort to advance “education” by the Obama family in Kenya. Under the title, “Education First” assistant Mufti of the coastal city of Mombasa Ahmad Bimsallam, chimed in explaining that, “the grand destruction that came upon Muslims in Kenya, came from the education and schools that are planted all over the nation by Christian missionary movements.”

Al-Arab does not even consider President Obama’s conversion to Christianity an issue and included a section entitled, “Obama’s Islam” while stating:

President Obama’s Islamic faith was considered a polarizing subject between Muslims and Christians in the Republic of Kenya. It is a center of struggle in the media and continues, as the Anglican Church there attempted to orchestrate a baptismal ordination for his grandmother Sarah in a grand celebration at the Gomokinyata playground in Kizimo, the third largest city in Kenya. It was a trick to trap her, pretending to invite her as a guest, as the church sent out information about her conversion and abandonment of Islam. The young Musa Ismail Obama, the cousin of the American president commented during his interview with Al-Arab that he was with his grandmother during Ramadan in the Holy Land in Mecca to do the Umra festivities after she completed her pilgrimage by invitation from the King of Saudi Arabia. Musa Obama who studied Sharia in Medina spoke to us regarding the situation of Muslims in Kenya calling upon the Arab and Islamic states to put more efforttoward aiding the Kenyan Muslim brethren, especially since there is much support coming from Western nations and Western churches, spreading to the rest of Kenyan society from different religions. Musa opined that the situation of Muslims in Kenya is continually getting better, pointing to the village of Barack Obama, Kogelo, which is situated on the shores of Victoria Lake, in Western Kenya, for example, had no Muslims except his family. But now, they are increasing, and that the majority of new Muslims adopted Islam from the kind treatment of their family and that they have now a benevolent institution to raise funds and give important aid to the orphans and the poor, and it also gives scholarships to study Sharia in Medina [Saudi Arabia]. Musa also stated that despite the fact that Barack Obama hasn’t visited his tribe in Kenya since his election in the United States, there is a continual communication between him and several members of his family and his tribe in Kenya, of which the Kenyan prime minister is also a member. We have also had members of the tribe who came to celebrate the appointment of one of their tribesmen as president of the United States a while ago. Musa also clarified that the election of Barack Obama had an impact for the betterment of the Muslim situation in Kenya to a certain degree, despite the attempts of churches to obstruct Muslim demands and rights, especially what relates to segregation and persecution against them in schools, as well as the issue of hijab and the lack of constitutional rights for Muslims in establishing Sharia courts.”

Perhaps most explosive is that president Obama’s uncle Sayid Hussein Obama is active in his work with the notorious Muslim World League (MWL) as reported by Saudi media:

His Excellency Dr. Abdullah bin Abdul Mohsin Al-Turki, Secretary General of the Muslim World League, and a member of the Council of Senior Scholars in Saudi Arabia in Makkah received on Monday Mr. Saeed Hussein Obama, Kenyan businessman, and uncle of President Barack Obama, President of the United States of America, who paid a visit to the Muslim World League, accompanied by a number of Kenyan graduates from Saudi universities.

As we reported, the Muslim World League has extensive ties to terrorism. If Musa’s claims are true, that Sayid is Barack’s preferred point of contact with his Muslim family and that Sayid is dealing with the MWL, don’t the American people deserve to know the extent of their president’s connections and loyalties to these individuals and groups?

The MWL has numerous connections with al Qaeda operatives. In fact, several MWL employees have worked with al Qaeda. Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda gained material support and sponsorship—along with a cover—from MWL offices around the world. Dr. Abdullah bin Abdul Mohsin Al-Turki, Secretary General of the Muslim World League, received Sayid, one of the mostrenowned Wahhabi scholars and a pioneer in spreading Wahhabism through education.

The Kenyan Obamas are too.

This blogger can’t speak for others, but the biggest irony is that Walid Shoebat – a former, repentant Muslim Brotherhood terrorist – is one of the main forces raising alarm bells in the U.S. and the west in general. 

Far be for this American-Israeli to hold a grudge, knowing full well that Shoebat’s terror activities were aimed at her Jewish brothers and sisters! However, there is no doubt, he has more than redeemed himself, not only in Israeli/Jewish eyes, but in American eyes.

The question remains: despite the above, will U.S. patriots remain blind to his warnings?

Mystery Solved: Is The POTUS An Islamic Devotee…His Wedding Ring Tells The Tale…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

SEVERAL themes are recurrent at this blog: Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s devotion/fealty to Islam; the Radical-in-Chief’s leftist bent ( one intersects with the other ); and his ‘down low’ lifestyle. Understanding the POTUS’s plans for America necessitates delving into the above constructs, despite their messiness.

Stepping into Obama’s sewer requires a strong stomach, but it is doable. Therefore, a basic tour into his cesspool is required, and yours truly is mindful of the part she plays.

The following should do as primers: 

Ask yourselves: why would the leader of the free world insist on propping up the most retrograde forces in Islam – the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia? –

In tandem, another question mandates attention: why did the Radical-in-Chief select Valerie Jarrett as his CHIEF adviser? –

Adding to the puzzle, another sticky question arises: why are so many homosexual bread crumbs leading to the Down Low-in-Chief’s doorstep?


Now, while all the above – separately and together – demand immediate answers, here comes one definitive ‘revelation’, and it was hiding in plain sight!



He’s worn it on his wedding-ring finger since before he met Michelle

NEW YORK – As a student at Harvard Law School, then-bachelor Barack Obama’s practice of wearing a gold band on his wedding-ring finger puzzled his colleagues.

Now, newly published photographs of Obama from the 1980s show that the ring Obama wore on his wedding-ring finger as an unmarried student is the same ring Michelle Robinson put on his finger at the couple’s wedding ceremony in 1992.

Moreover, according to Arabic-language and Islamic experts, the ring Obama has been wearing for more than 30 years is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: “There is no God except Allah.”

Inscription on Obama’s ring

The Shahada is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam, expressing the two fundamental beliefs that make a person a Muslim: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s prophet.

Sincere recitation of the Shahada is the sole requirement for becoming a Muslim, as it expresses a person’s rejection of all other gods

Egyptian-born Islamic scholar Mark A. Gabriel, Ph.D., examined photographs of Obama’s ring at WND’s request and concluded that the first half of the Shahada is inscribed on it.

“There can be no doubt that someone wearing the inscription ‘There is no god except Allah’ has a very close connection to Islamic beliefs, the Islamic religion and Islamic society to which this statement is so strongly attached,” Gabriel told WND.

“Dreams from My Real Father” producer Joel Gilbert, an Arabic speaker and an expert on the Middle East, was the first to conclude that Obama’s ring, reportedly from Indonesia, bore an Islamic inscription.

Photographs published last week by the New Yorker from Obama’s time at Occidental College, taken by fellows students, indicate that the ring Obama wore three decades ago is the one he is wearing in the White House.

Barack Obama

As WND reported in July, previously published photos have shown Obama wearing a gold band on his wedding-ring finger continuously from 1981 at Occidental, through graduation at Columbia in 1983, in a visit to Africa in 1988 and during his time at Harvard from 1988 to 1991. But none, until now, have displayed the ring with enough detail to identify it as the one he currently is wearing.

WND reported a satirical edition of the Harvard Law Review published by students in 1990 contains a mock Dewers Scotch profile advertisement poking fun at Obama. Among a list of Obama’s “Latest Accomplishments” is: “Deflecting Persistent Questioning About Ring On Left Hand.”

The comment suggests the ring was a subject of student curiosity at the time and that Obama was not forthcoming with an explanation.

He still has not explained why he wore the band on his wedding-ring finger before he married Michelle.


Gabriel, born to Muslim parents in Upper Egypt, grew up immersed in Islamic culture. He memorized the Quran at age of 12 and graduated in 1990 with a Masters degree from the prestigious Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the preeminent Sunni Muslim institution of learning.

He explained that on Obama’s ring, the declaration “There is no god except Allah” (La Ilaha Illallah) is inscribed in two sections, one above the other.

On the upper section, “There is no god” is written in Arabic letters, from right to left: Lam, Alif, Alif, Lam, Ha.

On the lower section is “except god,” written in Arabic letters from right to left: Alif, Lam, Alif, Alif, Lam, Lam, Ha.

In the lower section, the word “Allah” is written partially on top of the word “except,” noted Gabriel, the author of “Islam and Terrorism” and “Journey Inside the Mind of an Islamic Terrorist.”

It is common in Islamic art and Arabic calligraphy, especially when expressing Quranic messages on jewelry, to artfully place letters on top of each other to fit them into the allotted space.

The exhibit below shows how the Arabic inscription fits over the two parts of the Obama ring.

“There is no God except Allah” overlaid on Obama ring

‘First-rate accent’

In an interview during the 2008 presidential campaign, New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof questioned Obama about his Islamic education in Indonesia, where he lived from 1967 to 1971.

After acknowledging that he once got in trouble for making faces during Quran study classes in his elementary school, Obama recited for Kristoff the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, the Adhan.

The prayer incorporates the Shahada, the expression of Islamic faith, with each line repeated twice:

Allah is supreme! Allah is supreme!
I witness that there is no god but Allah
I witness that Muhammad is his prophet

Kristof noted Obama recited the prayer in Arabic “with a first-rate accent.”

“In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as ‘one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset,’” Kristoff wrote.

Gabriel told WND that a person wearing a ring with “There is no God except Allah” demonstrates the significance of Islam in his life.

“Christians never use the statement,” he pointed out. “By wearing the Shahada on jewelry, a person communicates that Allah is in control of all circumstances. Allah controls you; Allah is the one and only one.”

Obama, who attended Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago for two decades, has repeatedly insisted he is a Christian.

Obama’s hand in a White House photo

‘Blessed statement in Islam’

Gabriel emphasized the importance of the Shahada in the profession of faith in Islam.

“Muslims recite the Shahada when they wake up in the morning and before they go to sleep at night,” he said. “It is repeated five times every day in the call to prayer in every mosque. A single honest recitation of the Shahada in Arabic is all that is required for a person to convert to Islam.”

Gabriel believes it would be impossible for Obama not to be aware of what is written on the ring, calling it a “blessed statement in Islam.”

“By wearing this religious statement on one’s hand, it connects the person to Islam,” he said. “It is worn in hopes that Allah’s protections would be with the person, in hopes of gaining favor with Allah.”

He affirmed that Muslim men do wear gold rings, despite prohibitions in Islamic law.

“Though Islamic law prohibits the wearing of gold jewelry by men, it is a widely accepted custom, even in strictly Muslim countries,” he said. “The wearing of gold rings is even more acceptable when it contains a religious message, such as ‘There is no god except Allah.’”

He noted there is also widespread acceptance of men wearing gold jewelry in non-Arab Islamic societies such as Indonesia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Pakistan, where Muslims generally understand that Muslims are subject to strong influences of local non-Arab cultures.

“Therefore, even though technically prohibited, a Muslim man wearing a gold ring is not looked down upon, especially if the jewelry reflects a love of Islam and a connection to Islamic society,” he said. “An even greater level of acceptance is for businessmen who deal with infidels, because such a person would be regarded as a person of influence.”

Obama signing legislation (White House photo)

‘I have known Islam on three continents’

Filmmaker Joel Gilbert, an expert on Islamic history, noted Obama wore the ring during his high-profile speech in Cairo on June 4, 2009, in the first months of his presidency.

“Now we have a new context for what Obama meant when he told the Islamic audience in Cairo that he has ‘known Islam on three continents,” Gilbert said. “He also told the Cairo audience that he considered it part of his responsibility as president of the United States ‘to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.’ All religious Muslims are by definition required to defend Islam.”

Gilbert’s most recent documentary films on the Middle East are “Farewell Israel: Bush, Iran and The Revolt of Islam” and “Atomic Jihad: Ahmadinejad’s Coming War and Obama’s Politics of Defeat”

Obama in Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009

Obama in Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009, close-up

The Occidental ring

The photographs published last week by New Yorker magazine indicate Obama was wearing the ring at Occidental College.

One photo shows Obama sitting alongside Occidental roommate Hasan Chandoo in 1981, apparently waiting for a meal to be served.

Barack Obama and roommate Hasan Chandoo at Occidental College in 1981

Obama’s extended left hand clearly shows the ring, as seen below.

The second of the recently released photos shows Obama reaching for a book from an Occidental College library shelf.

Barack Obama in Occidental College library in 1981

A close-up of the library photo can be seen below.

Detail of Barack Obama ring in Occidental College library in 1981

In the above photo, the ring’s design can be seen, including a series of parallel bars that distinguish its outer circumference.

The Obama wedding ring

The ring was mentioned in a New York Times article in 2009 recounting the Obamas’ wedding.

In the story, Jodi Kantor described its “intricate gold design,” noting it came from Barack Obama’s boyhood home of Indonesia and was not traditional, like Michelle’s.

Kantor wrote:

Just before the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. pronounced Barack Obama and Michelle Robinson man and wife on the evening of Oct. 3, 1992, he held their wedding rings – signifying their new, enduring bonds – before the guests at Trinity United Church of Christ. Michelle’s was traditional, but Barack’s was an intricate gold design from Indonesia, where he had lived as a boy.

There was no mention in the article that Obama already had been wearing the ring for more than a decade.

The photos of the ring from the 1980s can be compared with more recent photos, such as the onespublished by the Huffington Post in 2010 in an article by Anya Strzemien, “Obama’s ‘Intricate’ Indonesian Wedding Band: A CLOSE-UP,” seen here.”

Obama wedding ring, Huffington Post, March 18, 2010
Cards on the table.

The POTUS can enter every Christian church in the U.S., screaming to the high heavens, proclaiming that he is Christian, and expect others to believe him. No matter. In fact, he can enter every synagogue, ascend to the Holy Ark, and proclaim his Jewish fealty. Won’t change a damn thing.

Par for the course, those who want this issue to just disappear will twist themselves into pretzels; offering all sorts of explanations, from the benign to the bizarre. But this much is assured – find this blogger one other POTUS who wore an Islamic ring, and yours truly will send a registered apology to the White House.

Don’t hold your breath.

UPDATE: to all the doubting Thomases – . Nevertheless, this blogger had no such doubts, otherwise the commentary would not have seen the light of day.