The White House’s Revolving Door For Muslim Radicals…Courtesy of The Islamist-in-Chief…Addendum To: The Muslim Mafia…Their Overarching Plan…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Combing through this blog’s commentary one would be hard pressed not to find pinpoint connections, between Barack HUSSEIN Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia.

There is no other POTUS in U.S. history with such a “distinguished” trail. Perhaps this will become his signature “accomplishment”, when the history of the reign of the Islamist-in-Chief is written. In no small measure, it will take years to unravel all of the booby traps he set in motion, mostly relative to the infiltration/penetration of his Brothers, atop his economic Armageddon. And this blogger is no stranger to the Islamic dangers, as the Brotherhood Mafia has a pointed plan to overtake America.

In furtherance of the above, look to the following as the gold standard “people’s indictment” against a renegade, revolutionary POTUS; whose treachery vastly exceeds the most vile characters in the nation’s annals.

‘A Red Carpet for Radicals at the White House’

by Steve Emerson and John Rossomando
IPT News
October 21, 2012

Sifting Through Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Doublespeak…Claiming He ‘Has Israel’s Back’…NOT Exactly…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Well informed folks are already convinced, knowing full well the Liar-in-Chief weaves so many tales, regardless of the subject at hand. They have all the evidence required to make an informed electoral decision.

However, a segment of the population may have good intentions, yet are unable – for whatever reasons – to sift through the muck. And in many aspects, the amount of garbage is so vast, it leaves one breathless and hopeless.

Many helping hands are needed.

Most importantly, Jews who support Israel, but are still unsure of the Islamist-in-Chief’s related track record, are looking for concrete answers. Okey dokey. In addition, non-Jews, equally concerned about Israel’s safety, may need similar assurances.

With the above mission in mind, this blog has (hopefully) assisted many in their hunt for said answers. As a brief recap, the following is offered up for review, especially for those still in flux:

Without the POTUS’s dictates to Mubarak – GO NOW – Israel’s border with Egypt, the largest Arab nation, would not have become a safe haven for Al Qadea & assorted terror offshoots, burrowed deeply within the Sinai  – , ready to pounce, as of this writing. Israel’s intelligence services have issued a RED, HOT ALERT emanating from the Sinai peninsula.

Mubarak kept them at bay. Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s actions let them loose. The implications are not rocket science.

Even if one isn’t familiar with the POTUS’s Islamic-bent, it would be inconceivable to understand: why is an Israeli pre-emption more disturbing to Barack HUSSEIN Obama, as opposed to Iran’s HItlerite regime creeping closer to nuclear weapons? –

And what else can one conclude, when the highest general in the U.S. army (of course, doing so at the behest of the Commander-in-Chief) warns Israel to stand down, letting Jerusalem know that the U.S. will not have Israel’s back, related to any pre-emption against Iran’s genocidal program? – In other words, Israel is now the problem, not Iran’s genocidal regime!

In light of the above, at what point does delusional thinking become a pathological illness – , when leaders of the Jewish community still insist, yes, the Islamist-in-Chief has Israel’s back?

Besides, what will American Jews (and those who claim to care about Israel’s survival) require to finally intuit, the Islamist-in-Chief has a bull’s eye on Israel’s back? – .

Just perhaps…the following will seal the deal –

‘Obama’s real record on Israel’


October 23, 2012

“During the final debate, President Obama pointed to his 2008 pre-election visit to Israel’s Holocaust memorial, Yad Vashem, as an answer to Governor Romney’s criticism of his foreign policy on Israel.  That same stop was made by over a million visitors and hundreds of world leaders and dignitaries the same year.  Invoking it as a means to establish the President’s pro-Israel credentials is an insult to the intelligence of voters who care about the welfare of the Jewish state.

The president’s move is reminiscent of a similar game played by the United Nations. The organization trashes the state of Israel 364 days a year, and pauses on the anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp on January 27th for an “International Day of Commemoration.”

Undoubtedly, keeping the memory of the Holocaust alive is a service not only to Jews but to anyone interested in preserving and protecting universal human rights and freedoms.

But the question before American voters, who value our special bond with the Middle East’s only democracy, is whether the specifics of the president’s four-year record are consistent with the well-being of the people who live and breathe Jewish self-determination as a bulwark against modern anti-semitism.

Just a partial rap-sheet speaks for itself.

President Obama has never visited Israel during his time in office, despite having been as close as thirty minutes away in Egypt, and managing to go to Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iraq.

President Obama told Jewish leaders in July 2009 that he was deliberately adopting a policy of putting daylight between America and Israel.

President Obama has legitimized the UN body most responsible for demonizing Israel as the world’s worst human rights violator.  The president joined the UN Human Rights Council in 2009 and is now seeking a second 3-year term, despite Israel’s requests that he do the opposite.

President Obama made Israeli settlements the key stumbling block in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Starting in 2009 he chose to castigate Israel publicly, often, and in extreme terms at the General Assembly and the Security Council. The Palestinians took the president’s cue and ended direct negotiations until such time as Israel capitulates, even though the subject is supposed to be a final status issue.

President Obama treated Israel’s Prime Minister to a series of insulting snubs during his visit to the White House in March 2010.

President Obama cut a deal with Islamic states at a May 2010 meeting of parties to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, contrary to assurances given to Israel. He agreed to help convene a 2012 international conference intended to pivot attention towards disarming Israel and is currently negotiating the details of this diplomatic onslaught.

President Obama introduced in his September 2010 address to the General Assembly, a September 2011 timeline for full Palestinian statehood and membership in the UN, thus encouraging Palestinians to push the same unilateral move.

President Obama suggested in May 2011 that Israel use the 1967 borders as a starting point for negotiations – knowing full well that Israel considers those borders to be indefensible, and that agreements require the border issue to be determined by the parties themselves.

President Obama created a “global counter-terrorism forum” in September 2011 and invited eleven Muslim states to join – on the grounds that they were “on the front lines in the struggle against terrorism.”  At the insistence of Turkey, he then denied entry to Israel.

President Obama told French President Nicolas Sarkozy in November 2011 – when he thought he was off-mike – that he regretted having to deal with Israel’s Prime Minister.

President Obama asked Congress in February 2012 to waive a ban on American funding of UNESCO. The ban had been imposed following UNESCO’s recognition of Palestinian statehood and was consistent with U.S. law denying funding for any international organization that recognized Palestinian statehood in the absence of a peace agreement with Israel.

President Obama has indeed put daylight between American and Israeli policy on Iran.  In August, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dempsey said: “our clocks are ticking at different paces” and he wouldn’t be “complicit” in an Israeli effort to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities.

In September Secretary Clinton explained this divergence. In her words, the Iranian threat is “existential” only for Israel;  only Israel is “right in the bull’s eye.”  President Obama’s “pro-Israel” policy, therefore, is to wait past the point that the intended victim of the planned genocide believes is safe.

President Obama denied Prime Minister Netanyahu’s request to meet with him in September, despite the Iranian peril.

President Obama’s UN ambassador, Susan Rice, didn’t even attend the Israeli Prime Minister’s speech to the UN General Assembly in September – during which he made a plea for global attention to the Iranian threat.

And on Monday night, at the final debate, Governor Romney answered the question he was asked about what poses the greatest threat to our national security with “a nuclear Iran,” while President Obama responded “terrorist networks.”

Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. An Iranian nuclear weapon will result in a nuclear arms race in the most volatile region of the world. And it will make the chance of nuclear weapons ending up in the hands of terrorists all the more likely.

It isn’t hard to figure out which man will better partner with Israel to combat anti-semitism today and ensure that the lesson of Yad Vashem is more than a glib debating point.”

Anne Bayefsky is director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.

One can only pray that the above pinpointed, detailed indictments sink in BEFORE the election. Too little, too late will have deadly consequences, for both Israel & the U.S.!

First They Came For The Kiddies…Well Heeled/Known Prep School (Philips Exeter Academy)Trucks With Terrorists…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Aside from geo-politics, this blog is completely schooled in the nexus between Islamic indoctrination and terror. They are inextricably tied. Twins separated at birth, but always reunited.

Moreover, am highly acquainted in the realm of well heeled prep academies and the impact it has on the kiddies, whether negative or positive, knowing the score is a done deal. It leads to an understanding of the many doors these academies open, least of all to the life-long friendships, often becoming ones “go to” network as an adult.

Been there. Done that.

As a matter of fact, this subject was tangentially explored in a previous commentary when a mother’s concern jutted up against a raging Islamic network which was too close for parental comfort –….and here too –

Full Disclosure: a few close acquaintances/business associates graduated from the halls of Philips Exeter Academy (the subject below) back in the early 1980’s, and just a few years before its Islamic infestation. These individuals are at the top of their chosen professions, therefore, the influence many of its graduates yield is considerable, even if not in the Presidential arena.

‘Academy That Produced Three Presidents Now Terrorist Breeding Ground’

 Radical Islam Academy That Produced Three Presidents Now Terrorist Breeding Ground

Meet Maggie Hassan, the Democratic candidate for governor in the state of New Hamphshire. Maggie is married to Thomas Hassan, the principal of Phillips Exeter Academy. For those of you who are not familiar with Phillips Exeter Academy, it is ranked the number six school in the country and has an extremely impressive list of alumni that includes Oliver Wendell Holmes, John F. Kennedy and the list goes on:  Bill Belichick, coach of New England Patriots; James Spader the actor; Dr. Spock, renowned pediatrician from the 1950’s, and many more. The list is like a “who’s who” of American history, and there is no doubt that the students currently enrolled will have similar power and influence in the decades to come. So what could be the problem with that? The short answer: radical Islam.

To quote an excellent article by Chris Anu of the New Hampshire Herald:

…On Thomas Hassan’s watch, numerous Islamic scholars and activists with ties to radical Islamic groups have been invited to address student assemblies and other student forums. Among them, Hadia Mubarak, former president of the Muslim Student Association, spoke at a PEA assembly on Oct, 1, 2007. Founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, the MSA was labeled “a virtual terror factory” by terrorism expert Patrick Poole. Its former members include such notable jihadists as Anwar al-Awlaki, Ramy Zamzam, Omar Hammami, Abdurahman Alamoudi, Aafia Siddiqui and Ramzi Yousef.

As most readers know, the Muslim Brotherhood has been described as the common link between terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and al-Qaeda, yet it is somehow acceptable for PEA to allow a student offshoot of the organization on its campus?

More disturbing than the student group however, is the litany of guest speakers that have been invited to the school since Mr. Hassan joined the staff back in 1989. They include Ahmed Bedier of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), who spoke to PEA assemblies in 2006 and 2009. Many may recall that CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation Trial, the largest terrorism trial in American history. As the New Hampshire Herald article points out: :Its charter calls for the destruction of Israel. CAIR has funneled large sums of money to Hamas. Among those tied to CAIR are Ismail Royer, Bassem Khafagi, Ghassan Elashi, Musa Abu Marzook, Imam Siraj Wahaj and Rabih Haddad – all considered to be jihadist promoters.”

But wait, there’s more: “Nancy Khalil of the Muslim American Society also spoke at PEA on March 16, 2010. According to federal documents on terrorism, the MAS was “founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.”

We know from the HLF trial that the Muslim Brotherhood has a blueprint for overthrowing the government of the United States. The MAS is an integral part of that plan. Khalil is also a board member of the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center. Yusuf al- Qaradawi, the spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, who is banned from entering America, was somehow listed as a trustee for the ISB for seven years. The ISB has also written checks to the HLF, which funneled money to Hamas.

But it doesn’t end there folks. Ingrid Mattson, former president of Islamic Society of North America, spoke at Phillips Exeter in November 2005. ISNA and its affiliate organization, the North American Islamic Trust, admitted in court in 2008 that they have ties to Hamas. They funneled money directly to Mousa Abu Marzook, leader of Hamas. Federal documents quoting Hamas writings include such rhetoric as, “The day that enemies usurp part of Moslem land, Jihad becomes the individual duty of every Moslem. In face of the Jews’ usurpation of Palestine, it is compulsory that the banner of Jihad be raised. To do this requires the diffusion of Islamic consciousness among the masses, both on the regional, Arab and Islamic levels. It is necessary to instill the spirit of Jihad in the heart of the nation so that they would confront the enemies and join the ranks of the fighters…”

“Another speaker at Phillips Exeter was a Palestinian professor from Columbia University named Joseph Massad. He once called Israel a racist colonial settler state and said: ‘Let us imagine a world where the majority of Israeli and Diaspora Jews and their gentile supporters are no longer committed to Jewish supremacy.’”

Finally and perhaps the most disturbing of all is Jamal Badawi: “PEA chose Jamal Badawi to address its students on April 24, 2008. Badawi has several hair-raising affiliations, including the Fiqh Council of North America. The FCNA is akin to the Supreme Sharia court of Islam in North America. Its membership has included Abdurrahman Alamoudi, Taha Jaber Al-Alawani, Sheikh Muhammad al-Hanooti, Muzammil Siddiqui and Jamal Badawi. Google their names, and you will be stunned by how many of them are either under arrest, in jail, deported or culpable of sedition. Badawi is also a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood and founder of MAS.

The Egyptian-born Badawi gained notoriety from his book, “Gender Equity in Islam,” in which he promotes wife-beating. “There are cases, however, where a wife persists in deliberate mistreatment of her husband and disregard for her marital obligations.” Badawi wrote that under this type of situation the woman deserves “permissible beating” and “permissible striking.” Is it any shock that he was also an unindicted co-conspirator in the HLF trial?

What you might find shocking is that he spoke to students at PEA after he was named in the HLF trial.

Yes, I think it’s safe to say that Maggie Hassan and her husband are capable of doing a great deal of damage on many levels. Principal Hassan obviously has great influence over future movers and shakers. Maggie could have influence over the first in the nation primary state if elected governor…. think about the state’s election board. Also, given his credentials, Thomas Hassan may very well advise his wife on education in the NH school system. It’s not out of the realm of possibility.”

Few issues are more alarming than the above subject matter. And a whole lot less is more intrinsic, when juxtaposed against the inevitable well being of the nation. Why? Future generations are at stake, and this is precisely why co-opting the kiddies has always been at the center of the radical left’s plans. 

Bear this in mind. Without the helping hands/compliance of powerful radical leftists, the takeover of a school like Exeter (and others too) would be impossible. By prepping the ground with PC multicultural psychosis, the Islamic foxes have penetrated one of the most prestigious schools in the nation! Surely this is not an isolated case.

Not to be lost in the conversation, the questions become: Where are/were the parents in this unfolding disaster, spanning as far back as 1989? How is it possible that no one has raised alarm bells, witnessing a parade of Islamic thugs indoctrinating their offspring? Do they relieve themselves of their parental obligations, as soon as they drop their children at the entrance to the school’s doors? Or is it possible they haven’t the time to be bothered with such parochial matters?

Either way, they fell down on their most important job, and Exeter’s Board of Trustees has a mega load of explaining to do, not only to the parents, but to the community at large. How dare they host Islamic terrorists, or fail to do their due diligence? Have they no shame, no sense of right or wrong?

Rhetorical question.

One thing you learn (or should) as a parent, while expending a fortune to educate offspring: you are the consumer and the school’s administration must answer your concerns. Period. Can’t count how many times I walked into an administrator’s office….

Buyer/parent beware.

More to the point, are these parents dumb as posts; too busy to give a damn; or possibly in agreement with the worldview of the invited Islamic “guests”? Whichever way you slice it, the parents (administrators/trustees) are guilty as charged.

Exeter – time to clean house, or shut down! The principal gotta go, if only because he trucks with terrorists! Alternative media are watching…waiting…ready to pounce.

As to wifey, it will be up to the voters. Let’s hope the preponderance of residents are way smarter than those who send their kids off to this terrorist breeding ground; passing itself off as excellence in education.

Wouldn’t entrust cats or dogs to their care. 


Maggie Hassan
Governor of New Hampshire
Margaret “Maggie” Hassan is an American politician who currently serves as the 81st Governor of New Hampshire. Hassan, a member of the Democratic Party, represented the 23rd District in the New Hampshire State Senate from 2005 to 2010. Wikipedia
Born: February 27, 1958 (age 55), Boston
Party: Democratic Party
America….going to hell in a hand basket….

Northeast Intelligence Network Posits A DIRECT Nexus Between The POTUS, Saudi Arabia & The Muslim Brotherhood Mafia: Infers A PURPOSEFUL Precursor To WWW 3… Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This blogger is in constant contact with certain ‘ears to the ground’, both in the U.S. and Israel. Thus, most of the information referring to Middle East developments, contained herein, is culled from said exchanges. Of course, supporting said conclusions includes link-backs to well respected investigative journalists. One never cites who said what…or this or that, but the message gets out.

That being said, one of the better informed investigators on the scene is Doug Hagmann, Director of Northeast Intelligence Network. Recall this blog’s previous commentaries, and then Hagmann’s latest assessment will eventually come full circle. 

The Islamist-in-Chief indeed has irrefutable Wahhabi/Saudi roots – all his (eventual) protestations aside will not amount to a hill of beans.

And every alarm bell should be ringing, not only tying Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, but Huma Abedin, Deputy COS to gal pal Hillary, also a top Brotherhood operative –

So, is it any leap of faith to question: why did the POTUS help install Prez Morsi  (a leading figure in the Brotherhood), through his upending of Hosni Mubarak – GO NOW ? shouldn’t be.

Now, isn’t it interesting to note, the Islamist-in-Chief is championing continuous aid to Egypt, even though Congress said – not so fast. Why is this? Isn’t prudence in order?

In conjunction, the POTUS’s seemingly inexplicable reaction – the video made them do it – to U.S. assassinations in Libya, lends itself to further probings. What part did the State Department play in Bengazigate, under the POTUS’s orders, and most especially, where do Huma’s guiding hands lead? Americans demand to know.

Therefore, pay strict attention to the underlying thesis posited by the above commentaries, as well as Doug Hagmann’s following analysis – little that is roiling the Middle East, and setting it ablaze, is taking place without Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fingerprints.This is precisely why he is often referred to as the Pyromaniac-in-Chief; as he sets one fire after another, expecting to install his Muslim Brotherhood Mafia in all the upended regimes.

And, as much as he doesn’t angst about WMD’s in the mullahs hands, his goal in Syria is to ‘level’ the playing field; prying the Alawite’s stranglehold loose in Syria, replacing them with a Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda front.

In actuality, per U.S./western interests, the dangers are the same – BOTH Iran/Assad’s regime, or a Brotherhood installed replacement, are equally lethal. The only difference being, one has the power of the leadership of the free world behind it!

‘Obama: Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood operative?’

Death Race Damascus: “13 days in October”

– Doug Hagmann   Tuesday, October 23, 2012

“How will our great-grandchildren’s history books recount the events leading up to World War III and the great culling of the earth’s population that resulted? While I hope that this question never has to be answered, it is with that level of urgency that I write this report. First, I believe some historical context will be beneficial for an accurate understanding of our current situation.

Some might be old enough to recall the Cuban missile crisis with clarity and context. Others know it only through history books and verbal accounts from older family members and friends. While accounts may vary by perspective, the one constant on which everyone seems to agree is that we were on the brink of nuclear war with the Soviet Union during those “13 days in October” in 1962.  If things would have gone differently, historians estimate that up to a quarter of a billion people could have been killed by a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and the USSR.Cuban Missile Crisis redux

If one truly understands what is taking place on the world stage as I write this, then it is eerily appropriate that we mark the 50th anniversary of the Cuban missile crisis this month. We are, in fact, directly in the middle of those 13 days in October, 1962, and perhaps directly in the middle of the present day crisis. The path that the U.S. takes in the most immediate future could likely decide the fate of humanity. It’s that serious, yet unlike the very visible events of 1962, most people today are blissfully unaware how close we stand at the precipice of global war.

Although a nuclear armed Iran is indeed a threat to the security of the world, it is less imminent than the currently evolving threat that is forming elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa. Yet, our attention continues to be deliberately diverted to Iran from other areas where we are covertly involved. It is here that the Cuban missile crisis of 1962 finds additional relevance when we recall the covert attempts to overthrow the Castro regime in Cuba in the years leading up to the actual crisis.Iran: a deliberate diversion

For better or worse, our own CIA was involved in numerous covert operations to overthrow Castro after he took power in Cuba. The most visible and well known of these attempts was, of course, the Bay of Pigs operation that went awry in 1961 during the administration of John F. Kennedy. It can be rationally and reasonably argued that we had a lot at stake here due to the close proximity of Cuba to the U.S. mainland.

Following the failure of the CIA backed mission, former President Eisenhower told President Kennedy that “the failure of the Bay of Pigs will embolden the Soviets to do something that they would otherwise not do.” It was because of the failure of the clandestine actions of the U.S. that the Soviet Union indeed became emboldened and set out to position nuclear missiles just 90 miles off of the coast of Florida.

Although Obama is no Kennedy, Putin is no Khrushchev, and the Russians are not advancing their political agenda in this instance, the template is otherwise eerily similar. In 1962, Cuba was America’s “red line” as the Soviets were exporting their agenda to the West. Today, Syria is Russia’s “red line” that this administration is intent on crossing.  In Syria, the Mediterranean port of Tartus is the location of Russia’s only remaining naval base and sea port outside of their country. Accordingly, it is of significant strategic importance to Russia.

The port, as well as the stability of Syria is of critical security to Russia, not only from a defensive perspective, but also for the free flow of oil and gas to and from Russia. Turkey buys up to 80% of its natural gas from Russia, making that country Russia’s second largest client. Turkey’s role as an oil and energy supplier is predicated on the free flow of oil and gas from Russia and Iran. The status of relations are now being changed by external influences, namely the United States via the Obama-Muslim Brotherhood alliance and Saudi Arabia. Today, the Syrian Ambassador to Tehran stated that Turkey, in collusion with others, is attempting to revive the Ottoman Empire.

It is for this reason that Russia has upwards of 100,000 “advisors” in Syria. Despite their presence and warnings from Russia, we have been actively arming the anti-Assad rebels so that the Assad regime can be overthrown and replaced by a government sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Putin has directly and indirectly warned Obama not to meddle in Syria or risk direct conflict with Russia. Despite such warnings, Obama has continued his foreign policy of using al Qaeda backed rebels, supported by the Muslim Brotherhood, to install leaders affiliated with the Saudi-backed Muslim Brotherhood in Syria. Why would Obama place billions of people in jeopardy in a world war by his attempts to reshape the Middle East? What is pushing this agenda?

The Obama-Clinton deception

Despite the claims of many right-wing politicians and conservative media pundits, it is not a failure of foreign policy, but because of the Obama foreign policy that we find ourselves at the precipice of World War III. More importantly, though, the Obama administration and his spokespeople are deliberately misrepresenting the events that occurred in Libya to cover-up a clandestine operation that encompasses the entirety of the so-called Arab Spring. Libya is the Obama CIA’s weapons hub for the region. It is where the weapons are being collected and shipped for use in Syria, to topple the Assad regime.

Unlike the more palatable and readily acceptable goals of the government backed operations a half-century ago (i.e. fighting the expansion of communism), the goals of this administration reveal something entirely different. It is through this prism of understanding that all of the most recent historically significant events begin to make sense. Could answers to such basic questions concerning the background and meteoric rise of Obama, his relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood, his deep bow to the Saudi King be found in Benghazi? Might this covert agenda, if exposed, reveal that we are actually engaged in a proxy war with Russia on behalf of Saudi Arabia?

The above certainly sounds more plausible than the reason offered by Obama and his representatives to date, and also seems to be a more viable reason that this administration has gone to such great lengths to hide the truth from the American public.

Bay of Benghazi?

As I first detailed in my two previous reports, Lemmings at the Precipice of WWIII and Body of lies, from Barack to Benghazi, Barack Hussein Obama, it is becoming more apparent that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was involved in a CIA operation of the same magnitude as the Bay of Pigs, just not yet as visible. The actual story, however, is even bigger and even more deeply rooted in the “Obama agenda.” Ambassador Stevens is simply the most visible face of this covert CIA operation.

Based on my research and investigation, in addition to much assistance from a confidential source well-connected to the intelligence community, it is becoming clear Stevens was the “go-to” man on the ground for providing assistance to the “rebels” in Syria who are attempting to topple the Assad regime. This is the reason that he was at a CIA operational post in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 and not Tripoli, where the U.S. Embassy is located.

It appears that Stevens was working for the CIA under the direction of the Clinton State Department and the Obama administration to facilitate the transfer of weapons, including portable surface to air missiles from Libya to the rebels or freedom fighters in Syria. It is now being revealed that the weapons “confiscated” in Libya were being moved by the ton from Benghazi to outposts in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan for their eventual use by anti-Assad rebels. Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood play a role in the weapons distribution, while the “freight” is paid by Turkey, Qatar and most importantly, Saudi Arabia.

The amount of weapons is staggering. It is estimated that within the last year, between 30-40 million pounds of weapons were transported out of Libya. Considering that the U.S. and the intelligence agencies have had 24/7 surveillance over every inch of Libya, can anyone of reasonable sensibilities really contend that the U.S. was not aware of exactly who was smuggling weapons from Libya, if not directly involved in that activity?

Much like the Bay of Pigs, the CIA, under the direction of Obama, is deeply determined and extensively involved in overthrowing the Assad regime. Here we come back to the question of why? Is it for humanitarian purposes to free an oppressed people? No.

Body of lies and diversions

There are many lies being perpetuated by Obama, the Clinton State Department and even a complying and complicit media. There are also distractions being forced on the American public so that the truth can remain hidden, at least until certain objectives are accomplished. The most ludicrous of lies is blaming an obscure internet video for the attacks in Benghazi. Although that has been sufficiently debunked, all of the lies should be addressed one more time.

The initial “official” response to the Benghazi attack was to place blame on the video The Innocence of Muslims, and by asserting that the attack was the product of a spontaneous protest in Benghazi. The nature of the attack proves otherwise, and the adherence to that story is now exposing the foreknowledge and complicity of those parroting that account. The attack was preplanned, was directed at a CIA operational post which was looted of all documents and materials before being destroyed by the attackers. Simply put, it was a professional “hit.”

The issue of the “security failures” is also a bit of a lie. True, a security problem existed in Tripoli, not Benghazi, where “official” personnel were deliberately kept at a minimum to maintain operational security. To divert discussion to the issue of security of our diplomatic personnel is to intentionally divert attention away from the events taking place in Benghazi.

Furthermore, the brave men who died in the attacks were not part of Steven’s security detail. They were working under the direction of the State Department, ostensibly for the purpose of searching and destroying weapons left by the deposed Qaddafi. Based on information provided to me, they were collecting all of the working weapons, transporting those to Benghazi for transport to Derna, where they were to be shipped to locations in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan. The display of weapons being destroyed by these contractors in Libya was pure theater, as those were non-functional.

Additionally, there was never any kidnapping plot as part of an October surprise. So, what’s the larger picture?

Western media AWOL on arrests

Few Americans realize that two suspects in the murder of Ambassador Stevens and 3 other Americans were arrested in Istanbul, Turkey more than two weeks ago. Where is the U.S. media on this story?

Perhaps the media is absent because their arrest might lead to some very embarrassing facts. According to my intelligence source, the key leaders of the attack were speaking a foreign language identified as Persian.  According to this intelligence source, the known escape route from Libya by foreign operatives would be through Turkey, into Syria and out to Iran, which is the exact route taken and intended.  Identified as citizens of Tunisia, they were reportedly carrying false passports and spoke with a false accent, which was the initial reason they were detained. Further investigation, however, linked the two men to the attacks in Benghazi.

Are we not beginning to detect a pattern here?

Obama: Saudi and Muslim Brotherhood operative?

At this point, take a few steps back and review the complete picture. Many astute people continue to search for answers about Barack Hussein Obama – from his origins to his current agenda. One provides answers for the other. Motive, means and opportunity are an investigator’s trifecta for matching a crime with a suspect.

Despite his claims of transparency and after four years of holding the highest position in the free world, there continue to be a number of unanswered questions surrounding Obama’s past. His sudden rise from obscurity, his trip to Pakistan, his mother’s work in Indonesia, his step-father’s Muslim roots… there is a seemingly unending list of “coincidences” and curiosities surrounding Obama. Too many to include here, yet too important not to note.

The relationship between Obama and Saudi Arabia is not exclusive to this administration, however, and could very well be considered a continuity of agenda of certain previous administrations. The Bush administration is one example. Consider that the September 11, 2001 attacks happened on his watch. Out of nineteen reported hijackers, fifteen were Saudi nationals and money used for the attacks was traced to Saudi Arabia. Despite these facts, many prominent members from Saudi Arabia living or present in the U.S. were given the “royal treatment” in the week of the attacks, and were allowed to fly, without questioning, out of the U.S. This fact alone still angers many intelligence officials.

Is it possible that Obama represents a new but well planned chapter in U.S. and Saudi relations? Could it be that Obama was groomed and financed by the Saudis for just this moment in time? Is this all part of a larger, globalist plan that transcends political parties in the West and creates interesting alliances across the globe?

So many unanswered questions, yet few seem to be asking anything. Meanwhile, the entire Middle East has been set afire, a new Ottoman empire or Islamic Caliphate is being constructed, and the continued course of action by Obama will likely result in the crossing of the red line, quickly ushering in World War III.” – here too –

Keep in mind, commentaries within this blog are always backed up by layers of well informed analysis. Thus, peeling back Hagmann’s information is to peer into this blog’s looking glass; a treasure trove of information developed since 9/11/01, courtesy of several “helping hands”.

It goes without saying, this site is savvy enough to know when certain elements are out of its depth, thus, staying clear of such minefields. After all, who needs any more drama, especially when living in the hotter than hot Middle East.

NOT this blogger.

It is always gratifying to find oneself in reliable, respectable and qualified company.

Enough said.

What Happens When Degenerates Hold The Reins Of Power…Whether In America Or Israel? The Twinning Pathology of Barack HUSSEIN Obama & Ex PM Ehud Olmert…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Several critiques of Ehud Olmert, Israel’s previous PM, have been featured at this blog. They are resounding indictments of his political failures, and with equal emphasis placed on his moral shortcomings.

But this blogger can hardly light a candle to the critical analysis of Professor Paul Eidelberg; one of the deepest thinkers on the Israeli & American landscapes (, Conferring with him on pressing issues of our times is a distinct honor ( ).

‘Degeneration and the Plight of Israel and America’

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

“My article “A Critique of Modern Psychology,” published in the Journal Psychology,” sheds startling light on Ehud Olmert and, incidentally, on Barack Obama.

Although I am not a psychologist, I dare say that Israel’s former Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, now seeking a return to the Knesset, is afflicted by a psychological disorder of profound national and even of world-historical significance. Indeed, allow me to warn Americans that the same degeneracy is conspicuous in Barack Obama now seeking a second term as president. This, I am persuaded, would be the diagnosis of Dr. Max Nordau (1849–1923), a psychiatrist of uncommon breadth of learning. What does Nordau mean by a “degenerate”?

In 1895, Nordau published a book entitled Degeneration. Republished by the University of Chicago Press in 1968, Degeneration has been the subject of several doctoral dissertations. Nordau deemed the nexus of moral relativism and egoism as the basic cause of psychological degeneration. His book provides insights relevant to the pronouncements and policies of both Labor and Likud prime ministers, and, incidentally, of President Barack Obama.

Nordau practiced psychiatry in Paris. He found that nearly all degenerates “lack the sense of morality and of right and wrong” (p. 18). An inevitable concomitant of their moral relativism is “egomania,” which Nordau discusses at great length (pp. 241-372). He found that in many degenerates, egomania coexists with its opposite, “self-abhorrence” (p. 20). He discovered that the combination of egoism and self-loathing in degenerates conduces to impulsiveness and suggestibility on the one hand, and lack of balance and weakness of will on the other (pp. 19, 22, 23, 257-261).

Degenerates, says Nordau, lack a sense of honor, and they display no outrage by vicious attacks against innocent people (p. 260). (Notice how Israeli prime ministers consort with Arab terrorists responsible for Jewish bloodshed, and how Obama extends his hands to Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad despite the latter’s crimes against his own people and his malediction of “Death to America.”  Nor is this all.

Nordau claims that the degenerate is “incapable of correctly grasping, ordering, or elaborating into ideas and judgments the impressions of the external world.” The degenerate “surrenders himself to the perpetual obfuscation of … fugitive ideas” (p. 21). He pursues “fixed” ideas however visionary or unrealistic. [A current example would be ‘land for peace’ (p. 242).] Moreover, “facts which do not please him he does not notice, or so interprets that they seem to support his [illusion or] delirium” (p. 31).

Nordau anticipates Harry Stack Sullivan’s concept of “selective inattention.” (Notice how many Western leaders ignore fourteen centuries of Arab-Islamic plunder, butchery, and genocide). This selective inattention raises the question of whether degenerates compulsively misrepresent or consciously lie about reality. Nordau contends that they believe in the truth of their fabrications (p. 25). It seems to me, however, that conscious but habitual liars will eventually believe in the truth of many of their lies. In any event, since fear governs many degenerates (p. 19), such is their inability to face reality that even their instinct of self-preservation, according to Nordau, is crippled (p. 31).  Now let’s focus on Ehud Olmert.

On June 9, 2005, Olmert addressed the Israel Policy Forum in New York. The Sharon Government, in which Olmert served as Vice Premier, was then preparing (and indoctrinating) 50,000 soldiers and police to implement Sharon’s Gaza withdraw plan, that is, to forcefully expel Gaza’s 8,000 Jewish residents.

Dwelling in wonderland, Olmert spoke glowingly of the unilateral aspect of the Gaza withdrawal plan. He boasted to his American audience, “We really don’t need the United States to lead the [peace] process in the Middle East; we will lead this process.” Israel will lead the process, he said, because “it will be good for us and for the Palestinians” Indeed: “It will bring more security, greater safety, much more prosperity, and a lot of joy for all the people that live in the Middle East.”

Self-intoxicated, Olmert confessed: “We, are tired of being courageous, we are tired of … defeating our enemies.” This is a clear case of egomania confirms which Nordau’s understanding of degeneration.  Now let’s connect some dots.

Olmert could not have been oblivious of, even if he was not outraged by, the bloody consequences of the Oslo Agreement: the wave of Arab suicide bombings in Jerusalem and elsewhere in Israel. He could not have been oblivious of the murder and maiming and traumatizing of tens of thousands of Jewish men, women, and children. Yet he, like other degenerates, supported the Government’s illusionary and suicidal policy of “land for peace.”

Despite the fatal consequences of Oslo, and contrary to the warnings of Lt. Gen. Moshe Ya’alon, IDF Chief of Staff, Maj. Gen. Aharon Ze’evi-Farkash, head of IDF Intelligence, and Avi Dichter, Director of the Shin Bet(General Security Service), Olmert boasted that “unilateral disengagement” from Gaza would be a major step toward peace. His “selective inattention” is extraordinary. (Of course, this may also be said of other Israeli politicians.)

Further, despite the fact that the Gaza withdrawal brought Hamas to power and thus enabled Iran, via its proxy, to terrorize and depopulate the Israeli town of Sderot, Olmert persisted in his fixed idea of territorial withdrawal and even applied it to Judea and Samaria. As Nordau said of degenerates: “Facts which do not please him, he does not notice, or so interprets that they seem to support his delirium.”

Ever fearful of adverse American public opinion, Olmert said he will withdraw Israeli forces from Gaza as a good will gesture to [then] incoming President Barak Obama. (See,7340,L-3658377,00.html.)

Finally, a word about Israel’s fiasco in the Second Lebanon War for which Olmert was primarily responsible. An honorable man in his place would have resigned from office, especially after the Winograd Commission informed the public of Olmert’s ineptitude in the conduct of that war. But ineptitude is typical of men without honor. As Alexander Hamilton said of the scoundrel Aaron Burr:  A man devoid of honor readily succumbs to stupidity.  Have we not witnessed examples of this in the apologetic and philo-Islamic deeds of Barack Obama?”

As degenerates are wont to do, Ehud Olmert’s critical support for the “disengagement” ( or more aptly put, the destruction of dozens of thriving Jewish communities; via the expulsion of over 8,600 Jewish citizens, violating their human rights & Israel’s Basic Law! ) mirrors those whose main goal is power – by any means necessary.

And even though Ex PM Sharon, a degenerate politician (although a highly decorated warrior) was at the helm, Ehud Olmert’s important post in the government resonated loud and clear. Thus, the bitter fruits of “disengagement” are still haunting the Jewish nation, 7 years onward and counting, and with no end in sight –

Fast forward. Now, even though Ehud Olmert evaded partial indictment on his serial lawbreaking – and is still awaiting the outcome of other charges – one would think that a run for eventual re-election would be out of the question – – but NOT if one is a (im)moral degenerate.

In tandem, the most dangerous POTUS in U.S. history revealed his degenerate proclivities from the onset of his Presidency, as well as before he took office.

It is not as if the indictment againt Barack HUSSEIN Obama isn’t solid, as the most vile reprobates on the world stage champion his re-election –

Talk about like-minded peers!

Make no mistake. The west’s downfall will not necessarily originate from its external foes, but from the moral rot within. For if ones leadership are bereft of any moral compass, how is it possible for them to secure the welfare and safety of their citizens, or impart proper national values? 

And by extension, doesn’t it make it that much easier for ones enemies, lurking outside, to pounce? In other words, the secondary factor is the outside one. The primary one is inside the diseased body politic.

WAY past time to clean house – in Israel & the U.S!

‘Feminist’ Gloria Allred Has Romney In Her Sights…Her Stock-in-Trade…Attack…Libel…Under The ‘Shield’ Of The Law…Really? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Unfortunately, there are more than a few women in the public arena who qualify as ‘femi-storm troopers’, posing as part of the ‘sisterhood’. Gloria Allred is a highly visible, abrasive, nasty piece of work, and wants nothing more than face-time before the camera. 

An egomaniac on steroids and stilettos. 

As a lawyer, sworn as an ‘officer of the court’, Allred’s penchant for smears and gutter politics is especially egregious, possibly rising to the level of libel. Few dare take her on, simply because her persona is as out-sized as her overblown ego. 

Lawyers gone wild.

Be that as it may, Allred is up to her eyeballs in her next smear, hoping to take credit for Romney’s downfall. Whether or not she achieves her goal remains to be seen, but there is nothing she won’t do to get the job done – manufacturing lies are beside the point. They are her stock-in-trade.

Patriots dare not imagine that Romney’s staff are not keeping a close eye on her. They better.

‘Republicans bracing for ‘October surprise’ as Gloria Allred ‘prepares for Romney revelation’


“Republicans are bracing themselves for Gloria Allred to make a potentially damaging revelation about Mitt Romney, just weeks before the election.

The pro-President Obama lawyer is rumoured to be preparing for her so-called ‘October surprise’ in which she will strike the Republican presidential hopeful’s chances by unearthing some sort of secret or scandal.

Ms Allred has refused to comment on the rumours, which first surfaced in a tweet by the Drudge Report’s Matt Drudge on Thursday.

‘Here she comes. Hearing Gloria Allred out there again, about to make a move. After all, it’s her time of the campaign. Team O at the ready!!’ Mr Drudge wrote on Twitter.

According to, Ms Allred launched a last minute strike on GOP Meg Whitman’s campaign for governor of California by representing a disgruntled former housekeeper.

In the pivotal moments of the campaign, the lawyer wheeled out Nicky Diaz who alleged that she was fired by the Whitman family because she was an illegal immigrant.

Whitman went on to lose the election to Democrat Jerry Brown.

Ms Allred refused to confirm or deny the rumours regarding Governor Romne

‘I have no comment at this time about Mr Drudge’s Tweet. I don’t discuss meetings with potential clients,’ she told

But Republicans commentators are running scared, rallying the troops for a pre-emptive attack.

Scared: Supporters of Mitt Romney, pictured with Paul Ryan, are rallying the troops for a pre-emptive attack

New York Conservative blog, The Red Side of Life, demanded Romney supporters ‘stop her now,’ adding ‘we’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred.’

‘Gloria Allred Prepares Anti-Mitt Strike You Can STOP Her Now! (action!) Don’t underestimate Gloria Allred’s ability to inflict damage,’ the website reads.

‘The media will ‘eat up’ anything she feeds them and turn it into an endless scandal. Recall she took down Cain and RINO Whitman with NO EVIDENCE. We’re doing too well to risk ‘an Allred.’ She can be stopped, but it will take action on our behalf.’

Most polls show President Obama and Mitt Romney are head to head in the final weeks before the November 6 presidential election.”

The following video clip is demonstrative of her underlying modus operandi – attack…destroy…play fast & loose…all in the name of feigning the high road, but nothing could be farther from the truth.

A well coiffed snake-in-the-grass.

Allred represents everything that is wrong with ‘women gone wild’; resulting in yours truly wanting to wipe that self important, smug smirk off her face. Surely she will one day be on the receiving end of all her malfeasance.

Karma is a bitch. Every dog has its day.

UPDATE: it looks like this leftist bitch received her just desserts – – a smack down via the court!

World Leaders OPENLY Endorsing The Radical-in-Chief Are The Most Vile Dregs In The International Arena…Why Are They Simpatico To ‘Dear Leader’?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The company you keep is a mirror image of who you are and what your beliefs are. This truth is self evident. However, its efficacy is of historical import, especially since the fate of western civilization hangs in the balance.

So, what are voters to make of the legion of dictators, thugs, and serial human rights violators OPENLY endorsing “The One” for a second term?

‘Chavez, Castro, Putin: Four more years!’

by: Ilana Freedman
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
“Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, right, and Russia’s Prime Minister Vladimir Putin find time for a chat during a welcoming ceremony at Miraflores Presidential Palace in Caracas,

The latest [dictator] to publicly announce his support for the commander-in-chief’s reelection bid was Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who this week assured he’d vote for Obama if he were from the United States. The America-bashing strongman made the announcement on state-owned television, saying “Obama is a good guy” and that if Obama was from Caracas, he’d surely return the favor by voting for Chavez.

Earlier in the year the government-official daughter of Cuban military dictator Raul Castro proclaimed her country’s support for Obama during a visit to the U.S. “I believe that Obama needs another opportunity and he needs greater support to move forward with his projects and with his ideas, which I believe come from the bottom of his heart,” Mariela Castro said during a cable news interview. …

That brings us to Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who has eliminated most elections in his country, monopolized all major media and destroyed the political party system. … In a letter to a major newspaper, the president of a group dedicated to expanding freedom around the world points out that under Putin there has been an “across-the-board crackdown on civil society.” The piece goes on to ask: “Will Obama stand up against Putin’s abuses?” Unlikely, now that the Russian dictator has extended his endorsement.”

In effect, is it any wonder that the likes of Chavez, Castro, and Putin (surely others of their ilk are on board, albeit more circumspectly ) are atwitter about a second term for their comrade, knowing full well that the Radical-in-Chief will be unfettered in his “flexibility/reset”?

And if it looks like a socialist, Marxist, communist plan, then it is! – .

And does anyone, in the recesses of their cerebral thought processes, really believe that anti-American revolutionaries will not continue to do what they have done throughout history, that is, destroy all western pillars of individual liberty? . Thereby, how urgent is it to remove the most radical regime in U.S. history?

The most urgent task at hand!

For if he is not defeated, then the chances of reining in the Lawbreaker-in-Chief has a snowball chance in hell of succeeding –

True to form, the Liar-in-Chief will continue to tell his tall tales, up until the votes are cast – .

This blog has brought forward a resounding indictment against the Anti-American-in-Chief, a message which is painful to report on. Nevertheless, it is what it is.  Pretending otherwise will destroy the only nation which has protected the liberties and freedoms of all its citizens, as well as untold millions around the world.

Dare Americans take such a gamble; one which will change the course of history to the detriment of western civilization?