The more a controversy drags on, the likelier it is that the public will reach a point of exasperation, not with the “person of interest”, but with those who keep harping on the topic. As a matter of fact, such insistence on truth telling often works to the advantage of those who have MEGA secrets under wraps – or so it would seem. No matter. This one is such a biggie it is impossible to sweep it into the realm of psychotic babblings. 

From the onset, it has been patently clear that “dear leader”, aka ‘The One‘, is not who he purports to be. What an understatement. And though some of us knew this before 2008, the purveyors/denizens of “truth” – the media – begged to differ. They had/have his back and that is that. So, it has been left to others – mainly in alternative media – to pick up the slack. Our siren call. Be that as it may, more than enough proofs can be found at this site, as well as elsewhere. Seek and you shall find. You won’t be disappointed.

Almost 3 months ago, the subject was tackled, once again, at ‘Birthers’ Reaching Critical Mass: Congress Will (Soon) Receive An Earful & Eyeful. To wit, the following reigns supreme:

UPDATE: Eligibility resurrected: 

     “Most recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

     “We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

    “Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

   The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

  “There is something wrong with this,” Hayes had said.

  Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

And for those who were paying attention, surely the above came as no surprise. Hardly a sneak attack.

Back in September 2012, a few weeks before the election, even Israel’s science and tech website waded into the kerfuffle…say what? Naturally, those with their thinking caps on straight understood what an illegitimate POTUS meant for the world, and not just for America. Hence, they entered the fray.

Moreover, at the same time, an explosive expose’ tackled the precise question: Donald Young’s Mysterious Death & His Connection to Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Clear as a bell. 

The mystery didn’t stop with the above. By a very wide margin, it was not a singular account. If only. So, wouldn’t you know, another digging was required to sift through his muck, asking: Who Is The POTUS And What Is He Hiding: Reggie Love And His ‘Down Low’ Lifestyle. Phew. Icky. Would rather change dirty diapers, but this blogger digresses.

 Most ominously, ‘Mysterious’ Deaths Are Never Far From Barack HUSSEIN Obama. What is going on? Tragically, the list goes on…yet the following news is a hopeful “secret”, at least for patriotic Americans!

Top Secret Report Leaked: Congress 

(Sep. 18, 2013) — It’s been a quietly kept secret in Congress, but this week word leaked out that the case on Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President is indeed in the cross-hairs of Congress, but here’s the surprise:  it has just as much to do with the Republicans as it does the Democrats, which would be required for it to have success.

The most promising case (that would be a reverse on Judicial Review whereby the Judicial Branch usually reviews a law passed by Congress as abiding by the Constitution or not), for Congress in the eligibility arena is indeed the low profile case of Democratic Party Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy that landed without a hearing in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because of its multiple reviewed index in 2012 and January 2013.

Barack Obama’s coattails just aren’t what they used to be, and in the face of mounting evidence his long-form birth certificate is a forgery, the devastation prospect of de-funding Obamacare with the House Revolution gaining steam, with champions R-Sen Mike Lee UT and R-Ted Cruz-TX Senate, Democrats are coming off the coattails of Obama in many ways with the 2014 elections looming and the American People still seething over Syria, Benghazi, NSA spying, IRS profiling and over a dozen more scandals pointing directly at the White House.

Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse was given the task of determining simply whether identity documents handed out by Obama from the White House Press Corps Room were authentic or if it represented an act of fraud or deception. The first step in that would be determining if the document Obama handed out was authentic or a fabrication.

Lead investigator of that Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo’s determination that the document was indeed a fraud was also indeed slipped into Cody Robert Judy’s Georgia State Court case against Barack Obama as an eligible candidate who, by his actions of fraud, was actually hindering Cody’s campaign for president in the Democratic Party Primaries in 2012.

Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse findings were released March 1st, 2012 and were promptly inserted as legal evidence in collaboration of Cody’s insistence that Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President by the demands of the Constitution as far back as before the 2008 Election where Cody inserted a U.S. Supreme Court Case against Barack Obama in an Emergency Motion filed to the Federal District Court case he had against Sen. John McCain and the Republican National Committee. Judy v. McCain Case Number:2:2008cv01162
Filed: September 3, 2008 , that had to do with the same issue and McCain not being a natural born citizen with his foreign birth in Panama’s local hospital.

In the following interview with Detective Mike Zullo, supporting evidence from document expert and witness in the Alabama Supreme Court are discussed. Though the first two minutes is repeated in the video, one can skip ahead to see the entirety.

New Interview w Mike Zullo

[For video, see here]

The importance of this is also termed in legal jargon as having objected to qualification before Obama entered into office, not only in 2012 but in 2008, which maintains the grievance as unsatisfied by justice with prima facia evidence before trial which is sufficient to prove the case, which then led to the egregious manner in which Cody’s case was handled by the Clerks of the United States Supreme Court.

Cody’s case was sent to the Court some 7 months and over 7 times before he was actually given a case number. The only significant difference upon which Cody was granted a case number was the two other Georgia cases having to do with Obama’s eligibility that had also made their way up to the Untied States Supreme Court in theory giving the Clerks cover for a dismissal on “Standing.”

You might ask what “Standing” is and why it was used in this manner to dismiss so many of the Obama eligibility cases.

There are three standing requirements:

1) Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2) Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3) Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 case represented the ONLY case which satisfied all three directives of the “Standing” argument; however, if you want this to be covered up, what do you do?

You wait until there are two other cases from the same State Supreme Court to come up where the “Standing” argument can be used because there is no candidate for President in them, and you shove the one where the “Standing” argument is not applicable in between them and call it an innocent mistake.

That’s exactly what happened with Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and hearings in Congress can get to the bottom of it very quickly!

The biggest reason Congress has kept it a secret is that it is not something that is a mystery to its conclusion. Once it starts, it’s over for Obama because even Democrats in the United States Senate would be forced into submission in the overwhelming face of hard and convicting evidence.

[If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign,” or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

Editor’s Note:  The Post & Email asked Judy the source of the information about Congress’s alleged scrutiny of Obama’s eligibility, to which he responded, “It came from a source high up in the Government of the United States.”
Video – Sheriff Joe Obama ID Fraud Presentation – 5/31/2013

Besides, it is not as if alternative media didn’t put forth solid info in the past. Take a peek within – Occidental College Transcripts Reveals Obama Claimed Foreign Citizenship to Get Scholarship?

DESPITE the best efforts of all those involved, it will surely rest upon the shoulders of Congress to not only execute their due diligence, but their sworn duty; to uphold the Constitution (not the living breathing bastardized  interpretation) as the law of the land. Is there any more egregious (Congressional) violation than shielding a POTUS, who is no more eligible to serve than a person with fraudulent documents, including common criminals? Same thing.

What can American patriots do? Flood your reps with “marching orders”: open up a TRANSPARENT Congressional investigation into the POTUS’s bonafides, or the people will boot you all out – holding each and every one accountable – come re-election. They may not hold truthfulness close to their hearts, but they sure do care about clinging to their seats.

Simple as that!