Breaking: TX Supreme Court Finally Smashes Facebook … 5 YEARS AFTER SEMINAL BOOK DEBUTS, URGING ACTION! Adina Kutnicki

[Published at AmericasCivilWarRising.org]

AS is said, better late than never! Yes, let the rest of the (legal and legislative) dominoes fall into place. Faster … faster …

INCONTESTABLY, Facebook has been lending its platform to the worst of the worst, yes, the absolute dregs of humanity. No ifs, ands, or buts. This has been the case for years — mind you, even as they censor the righteous voices of patriots, conservatives, and all those who refuse to go along with the most anti-American/western wrecking balls, bar none. For heavens sake, the Zuckster aka “Master of the Universe” had the stones to censor President Trump — and, he got away with it! More than beyond the pale….

BACK to the (almost) 5-year marking point of a seminal book….

IN May 2020, this author wrote the following:

…… Full Disclosure: Back in September 2016 (how time flies!), this writer’s book (co-authored with Joe NewbyBANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad debuted. It was not for nothing.

In fact, this undertaking was not only laborious, a Herculean effort, if you will, but a mandatory clarion call from its freedom-loving authors. Effectively, BANNED explains how social media in general and Facebook in particular operates with a double standard that ultimately enables Islamists, a.k.a. greens, and socialists/Marxists/communists, a.k.a. reds.

It is to this end that 47 U.S. Code § 230 comes into sharp relief; both at BANNED and as the target of Trump’s blessed executive order, albeit long overdue! Mind you, it took close to 4 years — since the aforementioned book zeroed in on the acute dangers from Silicon Valley’s tech titans, censors — for President Trump to jump on board. But, to be fair, he has had his hands full with the likes of a shadow government serving as deep state operatives to overturn his presidency.

More specifically, Chapter Nine of BANNED, “Possible Political Solutions And Obstacles“, attests to the thesis at hand by targeting legislative action, primarily, through monopoly busting via updated antitrust laws, as well as by amending the (no longer viable) Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. Section 230.  To wit….

IN this regard, even though it is a Johnny-Come-Lately moment, it appears as if (inexorably, it’s not a done deal, until it is) the Texas Supreme Court has had enough of Facebook’s jive- talk and smoke and mirrors show — as they continuously trot out and hide behind the dangerous shield, that is, U.S.C. Section 230! Naturally, it is utilized by all the big tech behemoths — while they aid and abet all manner of heinous crimes, in this instance, FB + child sex trafficking!

AND another thing: atop the crime of sex trafficking, what about all of the non-stop sexual brainwashing….

AS per the great Lone Star State, Texas….

♦  ♦  ♦  ♦  ♦

THE BELTWAY REPORT | June 27, 2021

Facebook has suffered a major defeat thanks to the Texas Supreme Court. They are being sued over facilitating a child sex ring and tried to get out of it by declaring they are protected by Section 230. But, they have no problem censoring conservatives but does that keep them so busy they can’t do anything about a site that runs a teen sex ring. This just goes to show you that you don’t mess with Texas.

They can appeal to the Supreme Court but I doubt they would even take the case, meaning that the Texas Supreme Court’s ruling stands. This could cost Facebook dearly. If they make a settlement or have a big judgement against them, it could embolden others to sue over various actions instituted by Facebook. I would like to see a successful lawsuit against Facebook for censoring conservatives.

Business Insider reported:

The Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday that Facebook can be held liable for sex traffickers that use its platform to recruit and prey on child victims.

As the Houston Chronicle reported, the ruling followed three local lawsuits involving teenage victims who had met their traffickers through Facebook’s messaging tools. The plaintiffs said Facebook was negligent and did not attempt to key sex trafficking off its technology.

Facebook has argued that it is shielded by the protections of Section 230 — part of an internet law that states online platforms are not liable for what people post on their services — and should therefore not be held responsible for what is posted on its platform.

But the Texas Supreme Court said Section 230 doesn’t mean Facebook can operate as a “lawless no-man’s-land,” as the Chronicle reported.

Facebook has argued that it is shielded by the protections of Section 230 — part of an internet law that states online platforms are not liable for what people post on their services — and should therefore not be held responsible for what is posted on its platform.

But the Texas Supreme Court said Section 230 doesn’t mean Facebook can operate as a “lawless no-man’s-land,” as the Chronicle reported.

According to the Human Trafficking Institute’s 2020 Federal Human Trafficking Report, 65% of online sex trafficking took place on Facebook.

CBS News reported:

Data from the last two decades included in the human trafficking report showed that 30% of all victims identified in federal sex trafficking cases since 2000 were recruited online.

In 2020 in the U.S., 59% of online recruitment of identified victims in active cases took place on Facebook alone. The report also states that 65% of identified child sex trafficking victims recruited on social media were recruited through Facebook.

Twitter is also being sued for the same thing. A boy had his picture placed on Twitter and when he complained, Twitter told him the picture did not violate their standards. Another victim then joined the lawsuit. Hope it costs them a fortune.

♦  ♦  ♦  ♦  ♦

{ADDENDUM: Bear uppermost in mind — To stifle the truth-telling found at this site, FB’s censors have “zeroed-out” all of my articles via their “Boom and Ban” censors ala their ubiquitous “Community Standards” — as they hunt me up and down the internet like rabid dogs to their prey! No kidding. This is just some of FB’s modus operandi, what is now deemed their “love notes” to yours truly:This URL goes against our Community Standards on spam:adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.comACTIVITY

About your post Today at 4:34 PMNo one else can see your post.And so on and so forth. In fact, just recently, each article at my “parent site”, ADINA KUTNICKI: A ZIONIST & CONSERVATIVE BLOG, had its FB registered shares go from the hundreds, with some up to the many thousands, to a big, fat ZERO. In other words, all my shares have gone down the rabbit hole. Just like that. Poof. Gone. As such, take it to the bank that each and every conservative voice which reaches a wide readership will, sooner than later, be CENSORED. MUTED.} MESSAGE FAILED:This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

President Trump (Inadvertently) Backs Remedy Within BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad: Targets Silicon Valley’s Censors; Their Bias For The Red/Green Axis – Section 230 In The Cross-hairs

{UPDATE: Trump drops hammer on social media companies’ alleged bias by targeting crucial protection…..may freedom from social media censorship ring!!}

{Published at AmericasCivilWarRising.org}

INTRODUCTION BY ADINA KUTNICKIFull Disclosure: Back in September 2016 (how time flies!), this writer’s book (co-authored with Joe NewbyBANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad debuted. It was not for nothing.

In fact, this undertaking was not only laborious, a Herculean effort, if you will, but a mandatory clarion call from its freedom-loving authors. Effectively, BANNED explains how social media in general and Facebook in particular operates with a double standard that ultimately enables Islamists, a.k.a. greens, and socialists/Marxists/communists, a.k.a. reds.

It is to this end that 47 U.S. Code § 230 comes into sharp relief; both at BANNED and as the target of Trump’s blessed executive order, albeit long overdue! Mind you, it took close to 4 years — since the aforementioned book zeroed in on the acute dangers from Silicon Valley’s tech titans, censors — for President Trump to jump on board. But, to be fair, he has had his hands full with the likes of a shadow government serving as deep state operatives to overturn his presidency.

More specifically, Chapter Nine of BANNED, “Possible Political Solutions And Obstacles“, attests to the thesis at hand by targeting legislative action, primarily, through monopoly busting via updated antitrust laws, as well as by amending the (no longer viable) Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. Section 230.  To wit….]

FOXBUSINESS.com  By Nandita Bose May 27, 2020

U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to order a review of a law that has long protected Twitter, Facebook and Alphabet’s Google from being responsible for the material posted by their users, according to a draft executive order and a source familiar with the situation.

News of the order comes after Trump threatened to shut down websites he accused of stifling conservative voices following a dispute with Twitter after the company decided to tag Trump’s tweets about unsubstantiated claims of fraud in mail-in voting with a warning prompting readers to fact-check the posts.

The order, a draft copy of which was seen by Reuters, could change before it is finalized. On Wednesday, officials said Trump will sign an executive order on social media companies on Thursday.

The executive order would require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to propose and clarify regulations under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a federal law largely exempting online platforms from legal liability for the material their users post. Such changes could expose tech companies to more lawsuits.

FACEBOOK’S MARK ZUCKERBERG: GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP OF SOCIAL MEDIA ‘NOT THE RIGHT REFLEX’

The order asks the FCC to examine whether actions related to the editing of content by social media companies should potentially lead to the platform forfeiting its protections under section 230.

It requires the agency to look at whether a social media platform uses deceptive policies to moderate content and if its policies are inconsistent with its terms of service.

The draft order also states that the White House Office of Digital Strategy will re-establish a tool to help citizens report cases of online censorship.

Called the White House Tech Bias Reporting Tool, it will collect complaints of online censorship and submit them to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

TWITTER ‘CAME UP WITH A SEPARATE SET OF RULES’ FOR TRUMP

It requires the FTC to then “consider taking action”, look into whether complaints violate the law, develop a report describing such complaints and make the report publicly available.

The draft order also requires the Attorney General to establish a working group including state attorneys general that will examine the enforcement of state laws that prohibit online platforms from engaging in unfair and deceptive acts.

The working group will also monitor or create watch-lists of users based on their interactions with content or other users.

Federal spending on online advertising will also be reviewed by U.S. government agencies to ensure there are no speech restrictions by the relevant platform.

It requires the head of each agency to report its findings to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, within 30 days of the date of this order.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………

Introducing, Twitter’s sick and twisted chief “fact-checker”……

As such, is it any wonder that the following tweet (among countless others) passed muster with the censors at Twitter, yet, President Trump (again, among countless others) requires “tags about unsubstantiated claims of fraud in mail-in voting with a warning prompting readers to fact-check the posts” which disagree with the most powerful censors on the planet; Silicon Valley’s overlords!!

Image result for pics of leftist threats

Alas, the following explanatory video not only hits the target but completely serves as a piggyback clarion call to BANNED — even though unknowingly!