AMERICA ON THE PRECIPICE.EURABIA’S FATE SEALED WITH BRITISH LAW SOCIETY’S ACCEPTANCE OF SHARIAH LAW.FATAL.LIGHTS OUT!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Solicitors told how to draw up Sharia-style wills penalizing widows and non-believers

WHILE PC multi-culti fanatics, ala a psychotic need to appear “enlightened”, will never admit they are committing western cultural suicide, they are incontrovertibly wrong. Fatally so.

In a paradox of Orwellian proportion, yesteryear’s oh so urbane Euro set are now facing the most retrograde, non-enlightened, fanatical and deadly political/religious-cloaked force known to mankind:Shariah Law, the underpinning of Islam. NO amount of leftist spin will eradicate this fact.

As a matter of fact, soon after the Twin Towers fell (in tow with the rest of the jihadi damage accrued on 9/11/01), this American-Israeli pointed in the direction of Eurabia via the pioneering work of two seminal experts:Bat Ye’or and the late Oriana Fallaci. Both recognized what too few others did, and pointed out where the Euro-Arab collusion originated:Brussels:The New Capital of Eurabia. They understood where the sell-out was headed – a complete western betrayal. Its downfall.

NOT only that, it was obvious to anyone with eyes intact and a working brain that Eurabia was their first stop. The big prize, America, has always been the ultimate brass ring. Ditto Israel. Viewed as an American “outpost”, wedged within the heart of the Islamic beast, the Islamic cancer encircles the Jewish state virtually unabated.

According to Daniel Pipes,
Bat Ye’or has traced a nearly secret history of Europe over the past thirty years, convincingly showing how the Euro-Arab Dialogue has blossomed from a minor discussion group into the engine for the continent’s Islamization. In delineating this phenomenon, she also provides the intellectual resources with which to resist it. Will her message be listened to?[18]

Robert Spencer, an American writer on the West’s relationship with Islam, described her as “the pioneering scholar of dhimmitude, of the institutionalized discrimination and harassment of non-Muslims under Islamic law”. He argued that she had turned this area, which he believed the “Middle East studies establishment” has hitherto been afraid of or indifferent to, into a field of academic study.[19] British writer David Pryce-Jones called her a “Cassandra, a brave and far-sighted spirit.”[20]

Johannes J.G. Jansen, Professor of Arabic and Islamic studies at Leiden University, wrote in the Middle East Quarterly that “In 1985, Bat Ye’or offered Islamic studies a surprise with her book, The Dhimmi: Jews and Christians under Islam, a convincing demonstration that the notion of a traditional, lenient, liberal, and tolerant Muslim treatment of the Jewish and Christian minorities is more myth than reality.”[21]

According to historian Niall Ferguson, “future historians will one day regard her coinage of the term ‘Eurabia’ as prophetic. Those who wish to live in a free society must be eternally vigilant. Bat Ye’or’s vigilance is unrivalled.”[22]

Irshad Manji describes her as “a scholar who dumps cold water on any dreamy view of how Muslims have historically dealt with the ‘other’.”[23]

Therefore, the only shock is that Europe’s FULL submission took as long as it did. It has been in place, implanted, for decades.

Islamic law (sharia) is adopted by British legal system

Nail meet coffin. When I said the British government was, in fact, enforcing sharia law when they banned me from Great Britian I was not overstating it. In a stunning move towards complete capitulation, the Brits have just adopted sharia law.

“Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills. Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether.

They are officially and legally enforcing the misogyny and supremacism over non-Muslims. The land of the Magna Carta is dead. I wasn’t overstating that either.

“Islamic law is adopted by British legal chiefs,” By , Religious Affairs Editor, 22 Mar 2014 The Telegraph, March 22, 2014

Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills Photo: ALAMY

Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills.

Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether.

The documents, which would be recognised by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.

Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia principles, which recognise only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes.

Nicholas Fluck, president of The Law Society, said the guidance would promote “good practice” in applying Islamic principles in the British legal system.

Some lawyers, however, described the guidance as “astonishing”, while campaigners warned it represented a major step on the road to a “parallel legal system” for Britain’s Muslim communities.

Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect women from religiously sanctioned discrimination, including from unofficial Sharia courts in Britain, said it was a “deeply disturbing” development and pledged to raise it with ministers.

“This violates everything that we stand for,” she said. “It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.”

The guidance, quietly published this month and distributed to solicitors in England and Wales, details how wills should be drafted to fit Islamic traditions while being valid under British law.

It suggests deleting or amending standard legal terms and even words such as “children” to ensure that those deemed “illegitimate” are denied any claim over the inheritance.

It recommends that some wills include a declaration of faith in Allah which would be drafted at a local mosque, and hands responsibility for drawing up some papers to Sharia courts.

The guidance goes on to suggest that Sharia principles could potentially overrule British practices in some disputes, giving examples of areas that would need to be tested in English courts.

Currently, Sharia principles are not formally addressed by or included in Britain’s laws.

However, a network of Sharia courts has grown up in Islamic communities to deal with disputes between Muslim families.

A few are officially recognised tribunals, operating under the Arbitration Act.

They have powers to set contracts between parties, mainly in commercial disputes, but also to deal with issues such as domestic violence, family disputes and inheritance battles.

But many more unofficial Sharia courts are also in operation.

Parliament has been told of a significant network of more informal Sharia tribunals and “councils”, often based in mosques, dealing with religious divorces and even child custody matters in line with religious teaching.

They offer “mediation” rather than adjudication, although some hearings are laid out like courts with religious scholars or legal experts sitting in a manner more akin to judges than counsellors.

One study estimated that there were now around 85 Sharia bodies operating in Britain. But the new Law Society guidance represents the first time that an official legal body has recognised the legitimacy of some Sharia principles.

It opens the way for non-Muslim lawyers in High Street firms to offer Sharia will drafting services. The document sets out crucial differences between Sharia inheritance laws and Western traditions.

It explains how, in Islamic custom, inheritances are divided among a set list of heirs determined by ties of kinship rather than named individuals. It acknowledges the possibility of people having multiple marriages.

“The male heirs in most cases receive double the amount inherited by a female heir of the same class,” the guidance says. “Non-Muslims may not inherit at all, and only Muslim marriages are recognised.

Similarly, a divorced spouse is no longer a Sharia heir, as the entitlement depends on a valid Muslim marriage existing at the date of death. This means you should amend or delete some standard will clauses.”

It advises lawyers to draft special exclusions from the Wills Act 1837, which allows gifts to pass to the children of an heir who has died, because this is not recognised in Islamic law.

Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said: “This guidance marks a further stage in the British legal establishment’s undermining of democratically determined human rights-compliant law in favour of religious law from another era and another culture. British equality law is more comprehensive in scope and remedies than any elsewhere in the world. Instead of protecting it, The Law Society seems determined to sacrifice the progress made in the last 500 years.”

Lady Cox said: “Everyone has freedom to make their own will and everyone has freedom to let those wills reflect their religious beliefs. But to have an organisation such as The Law Society seeming to promote or encourage a policy which is inherently gender discriminatory in a way which will have very serious implications for women and possibly for children is a matter of deep concern.”

AS to their main trophy, here is where things currently stand:

Embed One:

As is said, denial is a river, and a dangerous one at that:SHARIAH LAW REVEALED: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM “THE PLAN”, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO! 

 

Embed Two:

And, just in case naysayers are babbling in your ears, know this:AG HOLDER SUPPLANTS U.S. LAW:IMPOSES SHARIAH LAW BY SILENCING CRITICISM OF ISLAM & MORE!(GRAPHIC IMAGE) Holy smokes.

Embed Three:

As always, there are bound to be countless “doubting Thomases”. Let them believe in the tooth fairy. That doesn’t mean rational folks have to:SHARIAH LAW MANDATES ISLAMIC WARFARE ON A MAIN TARGET:THE SILENCING OF THE WEST. HILLARY CLINTON, OBAMA INC. LEND SUPPORT! 

Facts are stubborn. The above are based on Koranic dictates and are centuries old. Immutable. Non-reforming.

To be sure, Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s deconstruction of America’s exceptional-ism sped things up. However, decades of radical leftist mischief started the “transformation” process, one which the POTUS was all too pleased to implement.

AS a result, this blogger non-reservedly warned (in July 2012), a mere month after the inception of this site, re the mischief propagated via  multi-culti brayers:A Global Conflagration Is Upon Us, Despite The Persistent Dreamers In Our Midst!!

Shortly thereafter, with the 2012 elections looming, this was proffered:Barack Hussein Obama’s Deconstruction Plans:Green-Wise Via The Economy, Disarming The Citizens Via Gun Control/Connecting The Dots. As to the beneficiaries, look no further:“DHS Insider” Reveals, Congressman Louie Gohmert Too:Disarming Americans (Gun Control) Empowers the Red/Green Alliance;Sharia Law Its Beneficiary!

Are you pleased with yourselves? May the west’s multi-culti proponents be its first victims. As leftists are wont to opine:fair IS fair!

 

SHARIAH LAW ENGULFS THE WEST: A Mandatory Implantation Before A Full Take Over…Commentary Adina Kutnicki

Those of us who understand the insidious and encroaching perils from Shariah Law are not surprised by the “news” (“Shopping in the Mother Country”) below, but it doesn’t make the skin crawl any less.

Incontestably, Europe is near bowed. Many paying close attention already know this fact. As a matter of record, two of Europe’s early“voices in the wilderness” described said dangers years ago, but were vilified for their efforts. Demonized. They deserve countless mea culpas, but will never receive them from the poohbahs in our midst. Nevertheless, their clarion calls have been more than vindicated, but such admission becomes cold comfort, especially in light of present day events.

Specifically, in her seminal work, Bat Ye’or, recognized what few had the courage to state, as most were (still are) unwilling to admit to what was happening in their own backyards, described herein:

The Status of Non-Muslim Minorities Under Islamic Rule

Dhimmitude: the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word “dhimmitude” as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye’or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word “dhimmitude” comes from dhimmi, an Arabic word meaning “protected”. Dhimmi was the name applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim populations who surrendered by a treaty (dhimma) to Muslim domination. Islamic conquests expanded over vast territories in Africa, Europe and Asia, for over a millennium (638-1683). The Muslim empire incorporated numerous varied peoples which had their own religion, culture, language and civilization. For centuries, these indigenous, pre-Islamic peoples constituted the great majority of the population of the Islamic lands. Although these populations differed, they were ruled by the same type of laws, based on the shari’a.

This similarity, which includes also regional variations, has created a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by a jihad-war and governed by shari’a law. It is this civilization which is called dhimmitude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each dhimmi group to survive as non-Muslim entity in their Islamized countries. Dhimmitude is not exclusively concerned with Muslim history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-Muslim peoples conquered and colonized by jihad.

Dhimmitude encompasses the relationship of Muslims and non-Muslims at the theological, social, political and economical levels. It also incorporates the relationship between the numerous ethno-religious dhimmi groups and the type of mentality that they have developed out of their particular historical condition which lasted for centuries, even in some Muslim countries, till today.

Dhimmitude is an entire integrated system, based on Islamic theology. It cannot be judged from the circumstantial position of any one community, at a given time and in a given place. Dhimmitude must be appraised according to its laws and customs, irrespectively of circumstances and political contingencies.For books by Bat Ye’or, see www.dhimmi.org

Similarly, the late Oriana Fallaci understood the swirling dangers, yet not from a sense of personal safety (a veteran war correspondent, she was hardly a wilting flower), but from the depth of her soul: The Rage and the Pride, an incomparable tour de force, was written shortly after the devastating attacks on 9/11/01. Her reaction in spades.

Alas, the multi-faceted reasons for silence from many quarters – regarding the steady march of Shariah Law, Islam’s underpinning – hardly matters, as the results are playing out in horrific view; like blazing fires, as the western house burns down!

Shopping in the Mother Country Goes Shariah Compliant

by JANET LEVY December 9, 2013

Major Retail Mall in England to be Shariah Compliant

1) The production and sale of pork and pork products will be prohibited. 
2) The production and sale of alcohol products will be prohibited. 
3) No gambling activities are allowed on the premises. 
4) The investment will respect the “purification” requirements of shariah by including donations to Islamic “charities.”  (We all know how that goes!  Revisit the Texas Holy Land Foundation-Hamas funding trial, the largest terrorist funding trial in U.S. history for more on “donations to Islamic charities.”)   


British actor James Caan (NOT to be confused with the Jewish American actor) heads the investment firm, Dubai-based Arzan Wealth.  He is extremely pleased with this deal, seeks similar investments and views the adherence to Islamic principles as a significant achievement.  
Janet Levy, Los Angeles


TV dragon James Caan swoops to buy £41m retail park

A major retail park has been sold to a group headed by a former star of TV’s Dragons’ Den in a £41.5 million deal – and will be subject to Islamic law restrictions.

Crossley Retail Park in Kidderminster has been acquired from Chester Properties by a company known as 90 North Real Estate Partners LLP (90 North), which has James Caan as chairman.

A Middle Eastern investor, represented by Dubai-based Arzan Wealth, was advised on the purchase of the retail park by 90 North, an independent advisory firm specialising in Sharia-compliant real estate investment.

Certain trades and activities are prohibited under Sharia law and these include gambling, the production or sale of alcohol and the production or sale of pork.

However, where any real estate includes a shopping centre with, for instance, an off-licence, the investment can be structured so that part of the income is ‘purified’ by being donated to an Islamic charity.

The property is the first retail park acquired with help from 90 North, and there is said to be growing interest among other Middle East investors. Nicholas Judd, founder partner of the company, said: “The investment platform we manage in partnership with Arzan Wealth has now acquired approximately £110 million of property and we are seeking further substantial acquisitions”

Mr Caan said: “Once again, we have demonstrated our ability to originate and transact across the UK property spectrum, with recent transactions including central London redevelopments, warehousing and student housing properties, all structured in accordance with Islamic principles.”

He said that these were ‘key aspects’ at the core of 90 North’s business. Councillor Fran Oborski, chairman of Wyre Forest District Council, said: “As long as the new owner continues to invest in the site and ensure we have no empty properties there, I think we will all be happy.

“I think this shows that the retail interest in Kidderminster is looking up, the sale figure is a healthy price. If we can get the investment there, it would be nice to see someone come in and fill the empty shops in the town centre.”

Just in case any of the readers are growing misty eyed over the siren calls AGAINST Shariah Law within this blog, feeling squeamish at best, well, you may want to first internalize some truth telling lessons:

Consider: how dangerous is it to enter the MANY “no go” zones in Britain (and all over Europe) with ‘Muslim Patrol’ vigilantes attempting to impose Sharia Law in LondonThe video (linked within) tells the tale…oops, it appears as if in a matter of a few hrs, since the blog post went online, the aforementioned link went poof out of cyberspace…perhaps Shariah Law censors realize that this commentary is swirling around like a (western) house on fire! Regardless, better to pre-empt now, before it becomes an unstoppable wildfire.

But for further clarification, citing the diametrically opposed value systems between the west and Shariah Law, peer within: Sharia Law: Susie Steiner explains the Islamic legal system which has sentenced a Nigerian woman to be stoned to death. Americans (westerners), just ponder: are you willing to lose your fundamental rights? First Amendment Rights On The Chopping Block: Via Criminalizing Criticism Of Islam!

If the above isn’t fiery enough, Obama nominee sees no “reason why Sharia Law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States”!

Most significantly, the creeping of Shariah Law into many key spheres – under the Muslim Brotherhood’s “guiding hands” – is dutifully burrowed within Obama Inc. Some additional proofs to ruminate over:

Wolff Bachner: In a modern, highly political world, one must have enablers and allies to enact any global initiative, especially one that is subversive and secretive. Who are some of the enablers and allies of the Muslim Brotherhood and how high up the political food chain do they go?

Adina Kutnicki: Beyond a shadow of a doubt, their enablers and allies reach up into the highest recesses of the political food chain, so much so that the leadership of the free world is deeply implicated. One only has to witness their rise and prominence within President Obama’s administration to internalize how close they are to fulfilling their mission of Islamizing the United States of America into the “Shariah States of America”. This is not hysteria-talk nor hyperbole. It is their ultimate plan. However long it takes (and they view patience as a virtue, centuries ago seems like yesterday in their mind’s eye, unlike the mostly ADD-afflicted west) they will keep making inroads, that is, unless millions amass to thwart their efforts within America. But even though they burrowed within prior administrations, their trajectory rose exponentially under President Obama’s “guiding hands”.
Most significantly, according to BizPac Review, Mohamed Elibiary, a Muslim Brotherhood-tied adviser to DHS has just been promoted to a high senior level position! The details can be found herein, but the following excerpt is more than an eyeful:

“The Washington-based, national security think tank, Center for Security Policy, published a disturbing 33-page report based on a series of interviews with Elibiary about his admitted ties to a man who raised funds for Hamas and “other radical Islamist causes,” all while serving and advising the Obama administration. Judicial Watch reported on the findings, noting that Elibiary “has regular access to classified information and is a prime mover behind two of the Obama administration’s most dangerous policies; normalizing relations with domestic and foreign Islamist groups (including the Muslim Brotherhood) and arduous enforcement restrictions of laws related to material support for terrorism….”

As such, the Muslim Brotherhood is already in Obama’s White House, and this fact must be internalized and seared into ones brain:

“On December 11, 2004, Muslim Brotherhood apologist Mohamed Elibiary was a featured speaker at a conference honoring the memory of Ayatollah Khomeini, the man synonymous with Islamic terrorism. On September 13, 2013, this same man, Mohamed Elibiary was named the head of the Obama administration’s Homeland Security Advisory Council. Watch Western Center for Journalism’s exclusive video to find out why, exactly, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood is pulling the levers of power in the White House.”

Mind you, Elibiary’s appointment is hardly an anomaly. Skulking Islamic “advisers” are regular fixtures within President Obama’s inner circle, though most are not as well known as Elibiary. It would take an entire expose’ to flesh out all the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated appointments, most of whom are comfortably implanted inside President Obama’s administration. Nevertheless, it is impossible to understand the gravity of the situation without knowing how embedded they really are. Like termites.

In this regard, it is more than reasonable to posit: why would the Obama administration allow said infiltration and penetration? Simply put, the evidence is overwhelming that President Obama – and his surrogates – is in “deep sympathy” with the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood. Their symbiotic relationship amounts to a whole lot more than “placing lipstick on a pig”, a colorful phrase aptly coined by Sarah Palin.

So, herein revealed: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA completes ‘PHASE 3′ from ‘THE PLAN’, infiltrates America’s Family Court. 2 more ‘phases’ to go.

Is it any wonder that the above DHS honcho crowed:

The United States of America is “an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution,” a member of the Department of Homeland Security Council tweeted Thursday. His claim sparked controversy on the social media platform, prompting the official to defend his remark in detail.

Muslim DHS Adviser  Mohamed Elibiary Under Fire for Controversial Islam Tweet

Mohamed Elibiary made the eyebrow-raising claim while debating whether Islamic countries treat non-Muslims fairly.

“Please show me just ONE example of an Islamic country where non Muslims are treated with equality?” a Twitter user said.

Elibiary responded: “America and yes I do consider the United States of America an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution. Move On!”

He also argued that “sociologically speaking” the Christian right is “similar” to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Washington Free Beacon first noted.

ALMOST a Shariah compliant (done) deal.