As is said, it ain’t over till it’s over, but oftentimes timing is everything. Now that you are thoroughly confused, let’s set the stage for a (probable)“perfect storm”.
There have been many challenges to the Fraudster-in-Chief’s “eligibility”, and you know that a nation is in deep doo doo when those with answers keep blowing up into puffs of smoke – literally!
So when it comes to verifying who the Commander-in-Chief really is (re his birth certificate and all requisite forms, forms which are necessary for ALL shmucky citizens), and since his “birth certificate” has been proven as phony as a three dollar bill, well, common sense tells us there is a there there. Mind you, all his other forms have vanished into thin air. Poof. It’s that simple. That hinky.
But just as with any force of nature which reaches critical mass and its peak, there is not a damn thing to be done, other than to wait for the storm to blow over. Some even enjoy watching the chaos unfold. Storm chasers, if you will. To each his own. This site wishes certain matters would wind/die down due to a natural course of events, but there is little rest for the weary. The wicked too.
MOST inherently, it appears that the aforementioned “perfect storm” is on the horizon, but we shall see which way the wind blows; in favor of the Criminal-in-Chief or America’s citizens.
Now, in line with the Alabama case cited below and with Fuddy’s death on the front burner, in tandem with Arpaio’s (hopefully, soon to be revealed) criminal findings, it should take Houdini to extricate him from the upcoming surge. But stranger things have happened! Sigh.
NEVERTHELESS, who would have thought that Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s 8 billion in bribe money to keep the Brotherhood in power in Egypt would fall flat? In other words, as powerful as the POTUS is, he got bushwhacked by General El Sisi! Oh yeah. As such, he is NOT all that “omnipotent”.
Judges still haven’t decided challenge to Obama’s tenure
Filed on appeal almost a year ago, a legal challenge against Barack Obama remains lurking in the hallways and offices of the Alabama Supreme Court, where at least two justices already have indicated an interest in the radioactive issue of Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president.
It’s been fully briefed, but the justices haven’t announced yet whether they will hear oral arguments on the dispute, even though Klayman asked for an opportunity.
The case raises some of the same arguments that appeared earlier in dozens of local, state and federal court cases over Obama’s first term.
They all argue in some fashion that because of the lack of details about Obama’s birthplace, he might be ineligible to be president under the Constitution’s requirement. That is thought to have been defined by the Founders as someone who was born of citizen parents in the country.
If the parents’ citizenship is a qualifier, Obama by his own admission fails, since he reports his father was a Kenyan student who came to study in the U.S. but never was a U.S. citizen himself. In fact, the senior Obama already was married, in Kenya, before he met and married Obama Jr.’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham.
This case is brought on behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who are asking Alabama’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
Klayman, in a brief, argued that the secretary of state, “having the power to certify candidates, can surely de-certify – in effect disqualify – them if they are found to be ineligible.”
He pointed out that, for example, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen rejected Petra Lindsay on the 2012 California primary ballot because she was 27 years old. The U.S. Constitution requires that the president be at least 35.
Of significance to the case is the fact that two of the justices have expressed interest in the truth of the dispute.
In an earlier case, the justices in that very court denied a petition filed by McInnish to require Obama submit an original birth certificate before he could be placed on the state’s 2012 ballot.
At the time, Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern.
“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public,” he wrote.
The “certain documentation” is the result of a Cold Case Posse investigation launched by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Arpaio’s investigation has concluded that based on the evidence, the birth certificate documentation presented by the White House as “proof positive” of Obama’s eligibility actually is fraudulent, created on a computer and not representative of any official document.
Investigators there have raised the possibility of fraud on American voters because of the document, and forgery on the part of those who created it.
Then comes Chief Justice Roy Moore, who is on the record wondering about the truth.
In an interview with WND in 2010, he defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders.
Lakin was stripped of his office and removed from the military when, on getting new orders, he said he wanted to see evidence that Obama was a legitimate commander-in-chief of the military, because following the orders of a fake would, in itself, be illegal.
At the time, Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.”
“And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.
In that 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he’d seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” – as the U.S. Constitution requires of presidents – and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.
“This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”
The pending case, on appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court, said the Alabama secretary of state failed her constitutional duty to verify the eligibility of candidates.
Klayman asserts the secretary of state “has an affirmative duty that stems from her oath of office under both the U.S. and Alabama constitutions, to protect the citizens from fraud and other misconduct by candidates.”
As a result of her refusal to investigate the qualifications of candidates for president, Klayman says, “a person believed to be unqualified for that office has been elected.”
The remedy, he said, “is to require each candidate to do what every teenager is required to do to get a learner’s permit.”
“It is to produce a bona fide birth certificate … and the Secretary of State is the official to cause that to happen.”
Citing the investigation by Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, Klayman says state officials “gained knowledge from an official source that there was probable cause to believe the Barack Obama had not met a certifying qualification.”
“It would be paradoxical beyond measure if the real and grave question of the legitimacy of the de facto president, a question which lies at the very heart of our American constitutional government, were left unresolved for want of the simplest of documents, a birth certificate,” Klayman said in an earlier filing.
If either a bona fide birth certificate is produced or an admission is made that it does not exist, he writes, “this most important of legal questions will have been answered, the purity of Alabama’s ballot maintained, and the anxiety of Alabama citizens stilled.”
If the issue is not resolved, he said, citizens will be left with the impression “that their government was dysfunctional and has ignored their real concerns.
Moore has established his own reputation as a justice unafraid of calling the results as he sees them under the Constitution, with little regard for the consequences. A decade ago, he was removed from the same office he now holds for defying a federal court order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
Klayman has described Moore as “one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”
“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine.”
Zullo explained that because it’s an active investigation that could produce criminal charges, he’s unable to reveal details at the moment.
But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth certificate, could be public as early as March….(continue reading at link above)
And if more hopeful news can cheer you up, perhaps Obama’s pilfered SS number will do the trick:OBAMA’S FRAUDULENT SS NUMBER: MARYLAND JUDGE TAKES NOTICE & OPENS A (LEGAL) DOOR! Keep good thoughts. Pray, like never before.
While all the above is brewing and stirring, rest assured, Obama Inc. is not cowering in the corner. In fact, it has already been placed on record – at this site – that plans are in place for an “expected” crisis, whether through an economic collapse or otherwise. Pick your poison.
In this regard, pay special heed to plans in place via martial law, and ratcheted up by DHS. Consider: What does Obama Inc. have in store for non-compliant citizens, whatever the catalyst appears to be?
Shiver us all timbers. The entire free world!