MOST recognize by now that the implementation of Obamacare is absolutely unconstitutional, regardless of Demster or RINO cover. This is a legal fact, simply on the basis that the law ORIGINATED in the Senate and revenue bills cannot originate therein. Too damn bad for Obama Inc., or so one would think.
So, in his infinite “wisdom”, Chief Justice Roberts twisted its “essence” into a tax in order to uphold it – as it violated all other Constitutional basis – YET it still doesn’t pass legal muster! You got that? Don’t let your head explode.
To wit, why would he expose himself to such (il)legal treachery and worse? But before we delve further, it is instructive to peel backwards, to the time when its “koshering” was at its highest octave.
Basically, Obamacare was not designed to overhaul the health system, aka “Affordable Care”, but to impose CONTROL over each and every citizen. And since Obama Inc. already controls medically-related life and death decisions, how much more so they will completely exert totalitarian rule because gun control runs through Obamacare: Obama’s March Towards Gun Control Runs Through ObamaCare…Via Its Definition of “Mentally Ill”.
In any case, what’s the end point here? OBAMA’S END GOAL: ROOTED IN NATIONAL/NAZI SOCIALISM. Obamacare’s “Hidden” Nexus Reveals All.
Back to the (il)legal treachery…
Why John Roberts (Likely) Is Protecting Obamacare…
On Monday, without comment (because he could not make a coherent one), Chief Justice John Roberts denied a request by the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons and the Alliance for Natural Health USA for a stay in the implementation of Obamacare. The groups had made their application last Friday, arguing that since the bill had been declared a tax by the Supreme Court (with Justice Roberts himself the deciding vote), and it had originated in the Senate (the Constitution says revenue bills may not originate), the law was therefore unconstitutional; and implementation of Obamacare should at least be stayed pending further examination.
While there are other minor issues attached to the application that were also not addressed, the truth of the matter is clear: John Roberts will never do anything to derail Obamacare, no matter what arguments against it are brought before him.
In 2005, when they thought they were doing the Democrats’ bidding, the New York Times dug into apparently easily accessible records and found that the children Roberts and his wife adopted in “South America” started life as Irish citizens. This is a red flag. The laws of Ireland regarding adoptions are very clear: adoptions by non-citizens are prohibited, as are private adoptions.
Apparently, when the Democrats realized they could control a Supreme Court Justice’s vote through blackmail over his having committed a number of international crimes, the Times pulled back and dropped its investigation. The Democrat paper of record pulled back because it didn’t want to “ break the seal of an adoption case” – as if violating laws ever means anything to Democrats in their quest for power. Keep in mind Barack Obama’s violation of his opponents’ “sealed” divorce records propelled him to a US Senate seat.
What does the Roberts problem mean for the average American who looks to Washington for relief from Democrat oppression? It means we won’t be getting any relief from the Roberts Court, period.
As is said, by hook or by crook, many will step over anyone who blocks their way. Some [hint: the Criminal-in-Chief] will make sure that those they deem “threats” never live to tell their tales, while others [hint: AG Holder, a radical racialist posing as chief law enforcer] will break this and that law, despite their mandates to uphold the laws of the land! Laws, what’s that? Oh, they are applicable for the unwashed masses.
Now, common sense tells us that the leftist-driven media circled the wagons around “their boy” Roberts – by keeping “faith with the law”, opining that the sealed records of Justice Robert’s children must remain glued shut – but not because it was a legal (and moral) imperative!
In fact, they stayed silent about Obama’s violation of a similar legal stricture, while he climbed to his Senate seat (with many radical, Islamist helping hands), by BREAKING his opponent’s SEALED divorce documents. In effect, legalities are nothing but convenient stepping stones, and herein belies the heart of the leadership’s deception and totalitarian bent.
While the children of the Chief Justice are indeed innocent bystanders, rest assured, their father is NO innocent. Therefore, because the issues at stake enjoin the highest price tag, matters of life and death (except the privileged few, those “exempt” from the monstrosity of Obamacare), it behooves turning the above info into a media circus, whatever way the job gets done.
In this regard, if the only way to get to the bottom of what is more than likely BLACKMAIL of inestimable proportions, then this site implores – especially alternative media and patriotic legal forces – who have the ability to push this issue to the max – break the adoption seal!
In reality, once the threat of blackmail is off the table, there will be little holding the entire dam from breaking, in regard to this and that illegal behavior. This type of action-oriented thinking is not rocket science, even if it makes one’s skin crawl.
At stake is nothing less than the lives of millions of Americans. Everything else pales in comparison, even the rights of the adopted – poor kiddies and all!
