ALERT : Radical-in-Chief Obama Tasks (il)Legally-Bent (AG) Holder…..To “Criminalize” Islamic Speech… Via Thuggish UN Dictates…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Thugs do what thugs do best. And criminals (whether white collar, petty thieves, or junkies too) behave according to the “laws of the jungle”. They bully anyone and everyone. It makes no difference if they are dressed in suits, and fancily titled too. Regardless of their puffed up appearance they are no better than street crooks, even if acting smug, entitled and powerful – Teflon don-like. There is no dancing around this societal issue.

Therefore, Americans (once again) find themselves in an ever escalating, dangerous situation, due to rapidly developing machinations from Obama and his gang of lawbreakers. Subsuming American interests into the UN’s global sphere is one of the regime’s highest goals, much more so than previous administrations, even though it has been tried before. A previous commentary ‘Washington Very Close To Subsuming The Constitutional Right To Bear Arms…Straight Into Thuggish UN Arms’ attests to their end game. Whether they succeed this go around, or down the road, is beside the point. What is the point is that they are not giving up.

Notably, Barack Hussein Obama bows/genuflects to a conglomerate of Islamic states housed within the unhallowed halls of the UN, a degenerate den of thieves on a global scale! Bearing this in mind, is it any wonder that Perez, a top minion/henchman from Attorney General Holder’s out of control, anti-American junta (he is a militant, illegal immigration defender/champion, among his sundry nasty “attributes”) defiantly refused to answer a basic Congressional inquiry such as this: will DOJ protect free speech or not? Does this question even need to be asked? Are Americans living in Alice-in-Wonderland’s topsy turvy looking glass? Apparently.

If the above isn’t mind boggling enough, here are a few snippets from the following report – “DOJ Won’t Promise To Protect Free Speech’ – – “A representative of Barack Obama’s Department of Justice has refused – over and over – to answer a question from a member of Congress about the agency’s dedication to freedom of speech….In fact, Representative Franks repeated the question four times: “Will you tell us here today simply that this administration’s Department of Justice will never entertain or advance a proposal that criminalizes speech against any religion”……. “The concept is that there should be a “Defamation of Religions” law internationally that would make it criminal to speak negatively about any “religion,” although the proposals always have focused on Islam……This is a battle for our basic freedoms,” he warned. “This [U.N. idea] is Orwellian in its deviousness. To use language like the anti-defamation of a religion. It sounds like doublespeak worthy of Orwell’s 1984 because of what it really does….Perez stumbled in responding, then referenced the context of the question. When Franks noted it was not a hard question, Perez responded that, in fact, it was, because “when you make threats…If you have a proposal that you are considering we will actively…,” Perez said…..“Here’s my proposal,” Franks said. “I’m asking you to answer a question. That’s my proposal. I’m proposing you answer this question….Perez wouldn’t”.

Read the whole dastardly exchange… view the embedded video too…pass it forward!

On its face, the American people find themselves between a rock and a hard place, as further evidenced by the following link – ‘Why Obama-Backed UN Treaties Can’t Trample the Constitution’ –

Basically, Constitutional Law supplants internationally backed UN law, supported in fact by Supreme Court decisions. However, in a situation where a lawbreaking regime believes they are above the law, why in the world would defying Supreme Court precedents thwart their efforts? It wouldn’t.

As reported by Doug Book, in the above link from “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s expected signing of the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty has once again raised the question of whether the terms of a treaty can take precedence over—even nullify—the rights acknowledged and secured by the Constitution of the United States….In the landmark case Reid v Covert, the Court ruled”…no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution.” In short, as “[the Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty,” the Constitution remains the supreme law of the land, and treaties may neither supplant nor amend it…..Though Congress has the authority to nullify a treaty legislatively and federal courts have the power to overturn any unconstitutional terms, the American public has learned that neither of these institutions can be trusted with the defense of the Constitution or the rights it secures. Should Barack Obama win re-election, it will be up to the people to defend their 2nd Amendment rights. And that could make for a very messy affair”.

Messy, indeed.

As addressed previously,, the “Red/Green Alliance” is working furiously/assiduously to impose strictures upon the west, under the guise of (specious/illegal) international laws.

This is what happens when an anti-American POTUS takes the helm, promising to transform  the US into an unexceptional (creating parity with third world dictatorships) nation, while holding Islamic dictates above all. Where the hell do Obama’s gangsters think they are – Hugo’s Venezuela, Castro’s Cuba, or one of the assorted Islamic head-chopping, Shariah-compliant states? It looks like it.

Better to be prepared for what lies ahead than not. Ignorance can get you killed.

Or, it can cause you to lose every freedom you once held dear. Clearly, not an American option!