BENGHAZIGATE’s NUGGETS: Thinking Outside The Box Leads To The Missing, Most Intrinsic, Piece Of The Indictment…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Thinking outside the box requires a certain logical mindset, as well as a relevant knowledge base on the subject at hand. But it also entails being able to withstand verbal tongue lashings from those who prefer to silence the truth seekers, in effect, tarnishing said thinkers with conspiracy laden pejoratives. And while some issues are obvious on their face, and need little edification from outsiders, others are rife with hidden layers. It is these layers which diggers, sifters and hunters are best qualified to unravel, despite the braying wolves at their doors.

So with Benghazigate front and center (including IRSgate & its illegal hammer blows to Conservative and Jewish non-profits; DOJgate via AG Holder’s squelching of the First Amendment, you know that quaint notion of freedom of speech; who can be expected to keep up with this criminal regime…nappy time is SO hard to come by…it will just have to wait!) it is imperative that we separate the “forest from the trees”. In this regard, a few markers are in order to assist the journeyers, and they are in no special listing of significance. They are all equal parts to the missing puzzle.

And as Benghazigate explodes before our eyes it is easy to lose sight of the hidden, core components of said deception, yet doing so may let the criminal suspects off the hook – Thus, staying focused, thinking outside the box couldn’t be more mandatory.

Reaching fevered pitch, this blog has its laser sights on one “lady” who seems to escape scrutiny and justice, time and again – Abedin is one such lucky Muslim Brotherhood diva, but her operative role will come to the fore. Yet harping on Humala was never an exercise in futility nor hyperbole, but a matter of national security, as some of us understand all too well, including Walid Shoebat -‘Did Huma Abedin ‘quietly’ step down as Deputy Chief of Staff in same month Bachmann letter sent to IG?’ – IF the mobbed up diva is not involved in Benghazigate, and the rest of the Mid East’s attendant fires, well, then pigs surely fly.

Yet the missing survivors are not technically missing, they are hidden from full view – as is an Admiral who knows too much! Patriots, demand their “releases” forthwith.

Nevertheless, despite all of Obama Inc’s deception, yes, their crimes are unraveling stitch by stitch –….and this is where the “nuggets” are hidden and come in.

‘The Benghazi Deception’

By Douglas J. Hagmann – Northeast Intelligence Network

16 May 2013: It is interesting that the corporate media, like sharks attracted to chum in the water, is just now appearing to treat Benghazi as a political scandal similar to Watergate that took down former U.S. President Richard M. Nixon in his second term. While many people see the comparison, I not only see the comparison, but also sense a collusion of a different, more nefarious and less conspicuous type as well.

As the details of Benghazi are beginning to emerge from “whistleblowers” and the murderous events are being rightfully elevated to the proper realm of criminal conspiracy, other scandals have suddenly seemed to erupt, almost as if cued by a complicit choreographer. Most egregious misdeeds of the Internal Revenue Service, for example, that allegedly targeted Conservative groups, from 501(c)3 organizations to any group with Tea party or Constitution in their names, were suddenly “revealed.”

Other scandals of lesser significance, but nonetheless poking at the embers of public ire and intolerance are popping up as well. Watching the people who are reading the multiple news headlines on various news aggregation sites are like watching spectators at Wimbledon, as their heads move from side to side as they follow the ball in play.  The white noise of new problems are constantly erupting, resulting in a feeding frenzy in the waters surrounding the Executive branch.

While fascinating to watch, has anyone stopped to consider that the process of chumming the waters with a flurry of cascading news events, combined with a docu-dump of 100 pages of Benghazi e-mails is actually a methodically orchestrated diversion? What is it we are not supposed to be seeing amid the white noise of new controversies of varying values?Are we being told that we’re aboard the Queen Mary and being directed to look over the port side at the antics of the sharks attracted by the chumming of the waters while we’re actually aboard the RMS Lusitania sailing through the Irish Channel on the afternoon of May 7, 1915? Meanwhile, a torpedo fired from a German U-boat is traveling directly for our starboard side, and is about to take the entire ship down.

Like a levy that has been suspiciously breached, the informational flood created by these news events is without recent precedent. The timing of this flood is of particularly critical importance. The headlines are diverting our attention away from a critical window of investigative value relating to Benghazi. Could it be that we’re seeing a form of force majeure being implemented to overwhelm and distract us from something far more important to truth seekers and consequently, much more lethal to Obama’s second term? Perhaps the Cloward-Piven strategy adapted and modified for the modern news cycles of today?

The Watergate-Benghazi time continuum

It has become common practice to use the Watergate “scandal” as the basis for any controversy involving the President or the White House, having set some arbitrary high-water mark for behavioral tolerance involving a sitting president. Watergate is commonly used to describe an intricate web of criminal deception that took place during former President Richard Nixon’s second term in the White House, and is routinely identified as the cause that brought down Nixon’s presidency.

A critical component of the Watergate investigation involved audio surreptitiously recorded by a little-known audio taping system installed in the Oval Office in early 1971 that captured nearly all utterances by anyone meeting with the president. During the investigation of the Watergate scandal, the recordings pertaining to relevant discussions were the subject of investigative demands and subpoenas by the investigating committee. Submission of the tapes became a bloody battleground between Nixon and the House Select Committee. After months of fighting, the tapes were finally surrendered and an unexplained 18 1/2 minute gap, or totality of gaps, was discovered. Analysis of that effacement determined that it was the result of at least five separate manual erasures, verifying that the missing time memorialized by these tapes was no accident.

Whether its Watergate or Benghazi, there’s one piece of evidence in both of these criminal cover-ups from which the actors involved try to deflect your attention by any means possible. It’s the proverbial garden path plotted by the architects of deception themselves. Following this garden path through the winding turns to its origins will expose that one nugget of information needed to unravel the lies and cover-ups elusive to so many. It is a highly protected secret nestled among other less damning facts, diversions and deceptions.

Benghazi is no exception, but instead provides a textbook example of diversion from the golden nugget hidden inside a crusted shell made to look like all others. So, just what is that particular nugget of criminal naughtiness?

Erasure of evidence: Present day

The nugget that is being hidden here is not content of the memos relating to matters of diplomatic security, but something far more nefarious and elusive by its mere simplicity.   Like the questions that surrounded the mysterious 18 1/2 minute gap in the Watergate tapes forty-years ago, there is a period of missing time that few seem anxious to address. By order of magnitude, however, this missing time is far greater than anything we saw with Watergate. Instead of 18 1/2 minutes of presidential time, it’s nearly 18 1/2 hours of time involving the actions, utterances, commands or lack thereof of Barack Hussein Obama as Americans were being killed a half-world away.

Expose that nugget and I suspect the findings will be far more damaging, far more troubling, and exceedingly more alarming than anyone has begun to imagine. It is this mystical missing period of time where many clues exist. Exactly where was Barack Hussein Obama following his 5:00 meeting in the Oval Office until the next day? Where wasn’t he? It’s almost as if the Wizard of Oz himself waved his magical wand to divert attention away from those lost hours.

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s crystal ball

It’s almost as if Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 2008 campaign commercial relating to the proverbial 3:00 a.m. telephone call was precognitive and eerily accurate. If not answering the calls to save American lives during the darkest hours of the night, could he have perhaps found a glimmer of light from a bad moon rising from which to order the positioning assets and personnel in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief? If not, then did not Hillary Clinton accurately predict the ringing but unanswered phone with crystal-ball like accuracy?

Based on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s unspoken ambitions for a White House bid in 2016, why aren’t partisan mouthpiece sycophants like Media Matters and Think Progress illuminating her prophetic warnings instead of shamelessly working overtime to politicize legitimate questions surrounding the murders in Benghazi? Instead of prepositioning political capital on behalf of Clinton, they are still in full defensive mode to divert all attention away from Obama’s activities taking place under the cover of a shadowy darkness.

Few have demanded, in the form and fashion of Watergate, to know where Obama was during this most critical time in American history, who he was with, and what he was doing – far beyond the snippets we have been provided. Why does the request for specificity for Obama’s activities during this very precise segment of time be shaping up to be some type of “third rail” to the Benghazi cover-up?

We know that the Secret Service, in tandem with the National Security Council perform joint drills for such emergencies such as this. The Secret Service, among others, possess very specific  logs from that night that could provide answers. Why has no one with the authority to do so requested a full accounting of Obama’s location and activities?

Interestingly, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s apparent powers of clairvoyance nearly a half-decade before Benghazi is being ignored rather than celebrated, and questions, much like an incessantly  ringing telephone, are being diverted instead of answered.

The missing 18 1/2 hours

Perhaps it was fate that placed a much younger Hillary Rodham to serve on the staff assembled for the impeachment of former President Nixon. Students of history know that her activities in this position were not themselves without scandal, but that is another issue for another time. Nonetheless, the outrage caused by the infamous 18 1/2 minute gap of audio of conversations between Nixon and others in the Oval Office during a critical time of high level discussions between Nixon and his closest aides was pivotal in the impeachment proceedings.

Presently, Americans are faced with another erasure of time well beyond the 18 1/2 minutes that was a focus of the Watergate investigation. It is exponentially longer and by orders of magnitude much more prescient to the events of that September day. Today, the questions far exceed “what did he know and when did he know it” of the Nixon era, and well into “where was he, where wasn’t he, what was he doing, and who was he with? The former refers to the potential planning of a cover-up while the later refers to a potential cover-up itself. It is a difference with a significant distinction.

With Watergate, we have a deliberate erasure of time that took place long after the primary criminal act occurred. With Benghazi, we have a Commander-in-Chief who while acting in that capacity, fits the very definition of MIA, or missing-in-action. Not AWOL as some have proclaimed, but MIA. A schedule not erased after the fact, but an itinerary deliberately withheld from the purview of us all. The Commander-in-Chief inexplicably went “off the grid” during a time of national and international crisis. He became MIA, but why?

We are often cautioned not to ascribe conspiracy to that which can be attributed  to incompetence. In this case, however, incompetence falls woefully short when a Commander-in-Chief becomes missing in action, especially during a time of such national and international crisis.

It is this golden nugget that is hidden inside a crusted shell that is the subject of diversion. That is the reason an obscure and inane video was initially grabbed from the inventory of ready-made diversions until it could no longer withstand reasonable scrutiny. His MIA status is the reason behind the $70 million public relations expenditure – no, payoff –  by the Department of State to broadcast an apologetic television message across the Middle East.

It is on this issue that we must never lose focus until we are provided answers, wherever and to whomever they might lead.

If you think this matter is trivial, then you are not thinking big enough.

At the end of their circle of lies rests the most intrinsic pillars/questions of all: Where was the Commander-in-Chief as American lives were snuffed out? With whom was he holed up? (and don’t suggest he was in bed with wifey, for even THAT would be a crime…as Commander-in-Chief he was expected to be in the situation room…and if he was in a commanding position, where are those photo ops, you know, the same type of poses taken when he supposedly ordered Bin-Laden to sleep with the fishes) And what was allegedly discussed?

For without said “golden nuggets”, the likelihood of Obama Inc. slithering out of jail/impeachment is a real possibility. And THAT, dear readers, would not only be an American tragedy, but one with cascading reverberations for western civilization as a whole!

American Warriors (Previously) DENIED Legal Counsel/Due Process…Not So For “Soldiers for Allah”, Courtesy of Taxpayers! How Can This Be? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

You know the world is flipped upside its head – prostrating before Allah supine-like – when American warriors are (up until now) denied legal counsel, but Islamic jihadists aren’t. How can this be?

More to the point, what message is being sent to American patriots when soldiers/special forces are treated WORSE than “enemy combatants”, as they are denied their Constitutional right to “due process”  (, even as Obama Inc. opines otherwise. As indicated in a prior commentary, they have been ordered to keep their mouths shut – or else – even as an Admiral has gone “missing in action” –

Never mind that they are testifying today before a Congressional committee, but the implications are very clear – patriots would do well to watch their backs, lest they receive the back hand of the government! In other words, it may not be worth their efforts to set the record straight. The fact that State attempted to violate a soldier’s right to counsel tells us all we need to know.

‘URGENT: Kerry Blocks Lawyers From Blocking Benghazi Whistleblowers’ – video embedded

“The State Department is blocking local lawyer Victoria Toensing from representing whistleblowers on the 2012 Benghazi attacks, according to her legal partner and husband Joe DiGenova. Teonsing wants to represent such whistleblowers at the upcoming Congressional hearings about the Benghazi case.

“The Department of State is refusing to grant clearances to Victoria and other people who want to represent the whistleblowers in an attempt to prevent the testimony,” DiGenova said. Read more via WMAL… Head splitting.

YET Boston’s Islamic jihadist – not unlike another “soldier for Allah”, as he shot up Fort Hood – is not only given legal protection, but the taxpayers are paying for it ! A reckoning is long overdue… 

‘Obama’s Lifeline to the Boston Bomber’

May 2, 2013 By  


dzhokhar-tsarnaevThe Obama administration is reportedly negotiating a plea bargain that would spare the life of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and that could allow the FBI to continue interrogating the suspect about other terrorist plots.

NBC News reports that federal prosecutors and Tsarnaev’s lawyers “have begun very early discussions about a possible deal in which he could avoid the death penalty in return for a full accounting to the FBI of what happened and why as investigators continue working to find those answers for themselves.”

Talk of a legal settlement that would allow Tsarnaev to escape execution comes after high-powered attorney Judy Clarke, a death-penalty specialist from San Diego, was added to Tsarnaev’s legal defense team earlier this week. U.S. Magistrate Judge Marianne Bowler approved Clarke’s appointment Monday.

Clarke is credited with helping to secure life sentences for clients facing the death penalty such as Jared Loughner, “Unabomber” Ted Kaczynski, and 1996 Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph. Clarke’s fees will reportedly be paid by U.S. taxpayers.

Federal terrorism charges were laid against Tsarnaev last week after some lawmakers demanded the U.S. citizen be treated as an unlawful enemy combatant. Such a move would have given authorities a freer hand to question Tsarnaev about Islamic terrorist operations.

Tsarnaev had been subject to questioning by the FBI for about 16 hours when Judge Bowler suddenly appeared unannounced in the suspect’s hospital room early on April 22. Accompanied by a prosecutor and a public defender, Bowler — not law enforcement officers — read Tsarnaev his Miranda rights and the suspect immediately stopped cooperating with the FBI.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Bowler made the right call. That decision was “totally consistent with the laws that we have,” he said Saturday. “The decision to Mirandize was one that the magistrate made,” Holder added.

But a legal expert said Holder is misstating the law, as handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the precedent-setting 1966 ruling, Miranda v. Arizona.

“Eric Holder was dead wrong when he said there was a legal requirement to Mirandize Dzhokhar Tsarnaev,” attorney Curt Levey, president of the Washington, D.C.-based Committee for Justice, told this writer in an interview.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling in Miranda says only that without a Mirandawarning the defendant’s statements cannot be used to convict him in a criminal trial. There is no requirement that you be Mirandized. It applies only to the evidence that can be used to convict you.”

In other words, had it not been for Bowler taking the extremely unusual step of reading Tsarnaev his rights, the FBI could have continued trying to extract intelligence from the suspect that might have been useful in fending off future Islamic terrorist attacks.

This appears to be a new approach to judicial activism. Bowler seems to have usurped the powers of the executive branch by taking it upon herself to decide on behalf of the American government that assuring the admissibility of evidence gathered from Tsarnaev in court was more important than possibly obtaining more information from him about terrorist networks that could have saved American lives. It is not supposed to be Bowler’s decision to make.

Meanwhile, citing unnamed sources, the Daily Mail (UK) reported that the Saudi government warned the U.S. last year that the other Boston Marathon bomber, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, killed in a shootout with police April 19, was a dangerous extremist. The security alert, which the Saudi embassy in Washington, D.C., and the Obama administration deny was issued, was separate from warnings about Tsarnaev that Russian intelligence provided to the Obama administration.

After Saudi Arabia rejected Tsarnaev’s December 2011 application to enter the kingdom to make a pilgrimage to Mecca, Saudi authorities sent a written warning to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the British government last year advising that “something was going to happen in a major U.S. city.”

According to the newspaper, the “government-to-government” letter named Tsarnaev specifically but did not indicate when or where an attack would take place. The Saudis acted because they believed U.S. authorities should be intercepting packages intended for Tsarnaev to look for items used to make bombs.

Tsarnaev’s tourist visa for Saudi Arabia was rejected a month before he traveled to the Russian republic of Dagestan where he may have received training that allowed him to make and detonate the pressure-cooker bombs that he and his brother Dzhokhar set off at the Boston Marathon on April 15.

The Saudi official rejected the idea that Tamerlan Tsarnaev was trained by al-Qaeda during his absence from the U.S. in 2012. Saudi Arabia’s sources in Yemen said Islamic militants knew of Tsarnaev but mocked him, calling him “the volunteer,” the unnamed official told the Daily Mail.

“He was a gung-ho, self motivated jihadi who wasn’t tasked by a larger group,” the official said. Blowing up bombs at the Boston Marathon is “beneath” al-Qaeda, he said. “They don’t think like this. This is like a firecracker to them. They want something big.”

In a related development, three young men associated with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are now accused of serving as his accomplices following the Boston Marathon bombing.

Under arrest for conspiracy to obstruct justice are Azamat Tazhayakov and Dias Kadyrbayev of Kazakhstan. Robel Phillipos, a U.S. citizen, is charged with making materially false statements to federal investigators. The trio attended the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth with Tsarnaev, according to FBI affidavits filed in federal court.

Days after the bombing, the three allegedly watched a movie in Tsarnaev’s dormitory room and then found a backpack containing fireworks. The gunpowder in the fireworks had been removed.

“Kadyrbayev knew when he saw the empty fireworks that Tsarnaev was involved in the Marathon bombing,” according to one of the affidavits. “Kadyrbayev decided to remove the backpack from the room in order to help his friend Tsarnaev avoid trouble. He decided to take Tsarnaev’s laptop as well because he did not want Tsarnaev’s roommate to think he was stealing or behaving suspiciously by just taking the backpack.”

The three men “collectively decided to throw the backpack and fireworks into the trash because they did not want Tsarnaev to get into trouble,” the document stated.

Tazhayakov and Kadyrbayev are also alleged to have violated the terms of their student visas.

The Boston Herald reports that the Tsarnaev family, including the two brothers and their parents, took in more than $100,000 in taxpayer-funded assistance from 2002 to 2012. The benefits included cash, food stamps, and Section 8 housing subsidies.

“The breadth of the benefits the family was receiving was stunning,” a person with knowledge of documents provided to a state legislative committee told the newspaper.

This means that Massachusetts taxpayers were almost certainly subsidizing the Boston Marathon bombers and their family as the two Tsarnaev brothers immersed themselves in the world of Islamic terrorism.

The state government has given more than 500 documents to the House Post Audit and Oversight Committee in the Massachusetts General Court, the state legislature.

“I can assure members of the public that this committee will actively review every single piece of information we can find because clearly the public has a substantial right to know what benefits, if any, this family or individuals accused of some horrific crimes were receiving,” said committee chairman Rep. David Linsky, a Democrat.

Welfare officials are investigating whether the Tsarnaev family notified the state about Tamerlan’s extended stay in Dagestan last year during which he may have interacted with Islamic terrorists.

The extent of the welfare payments made to the family surfaced despite official efforts to keep the information hidden.

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a Democrat and longtime supporter of welfare-rights groups such as ACORN, had earlier refused to disclose details of the welfare benefits, citing state privacy laws. The real motivation of Patrick, a left-winger often compared to his friend and ally Barack Obama, for failing to hand over the information was more likely that he was trying to defend his state’s out-of-control social programs from adverse publicity.

Adding insult to injury, if Dzhokhar Tsarnaev receives a sentence of life imprisonment, America’s taxpayers will be paying his bills for the rest of his natural life.

In essence, when a radical revolutionary regime has a death grip on its citizens ( then nothing, absolutely nothing, is off the table, even stripping the most basic rights from those who guard the nation, near and far. 

And to leftist brayers who opine, even the most reviled among us “deserve” their day in court – or else everyone is in danger of losing said rights – well, such balderdash is gutted of all its meaning in the face of the DENIAL of said rights to lawful, patriotic Americans! Or is there really “two rules of law” – one in favor of  America’s enemies and one against patriots? IF it looks like an anti-American regime….