Tag Archives: Adina Kutnicki:Will Barack Hussein Obama’s Lawless Justice Dept Finally Fall?

A Radical, Racialist, Islamist Apologist DOJ Imposes A Mega-Mosque On A U.S. Community…Addendum To: Radical-In-Chief Tasks Illegally Bent AG Holder To Criminalize Islamic Speech…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
9

The latest enforcement/infringement on American citizens – through an out of control Department of (in)Justice (DOJ) – is outrageously mendacious on multiple levels. 

On the one hand, it is no secret that DOJ is run by AG Holder, a radical leftist and Islamist sympathizing Obama official. Not only that, but the amount of lawbreaking under his purview is akin to witnessing mega-heists in broad daylight – record breaking within the annals of U.S. (legal) history.

Let us count the indictments, also wondering: when will AG Holder’s lawbreaking entity come crashing down? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Adding to the people’s collective heartburn and angst they find themselves – mouth’s agape – watching on in horror, as Obama & gang lurch from one anti-American disaster to another – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ ….feeling hopeless and helpless to boot. How much more misery can a people endure?

Atop insult to racial injury, the Radical-in-Chief tasks his racialist AG to do what? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/alert-radical-in-chief-obama-tasks-illegally-bent-ag-holder-to-criminalize-islamic-speech-via-thuggish-un-dictates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Have they no shame? Nope.

Now, if the above machinations are not enough for this dastardly duo, the out of control DOJ is also in sync with a made up, PC mandated “phobia”, sympathetically coined “Islamophobia”. Give this blogger a barf bag. It is a lie of gargantuan proportions, but nevertheless embraced by DOJ and the Islamist-in-Chief’s entire regime. Surrogates too.

Having previously demonstrated the efficacy of the above fantastical “persecution” at various junctures, a recap is available for first time readers. Just as a foretaste: readers are savvy enough to know when they are being smoked, and when western propagandists not only enable but shield Islamists and their trajectory towards their ultimate target, Sharia Law, this is the result – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/06/islamophobia-their-propagandists-western-enablers-who-shield-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Isn’t it infuriating to learn that movie makers, corporate heads, and – for heavens sake – police too are dancing to Islamic tunes? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/05/u-s-movie-makers-corporate-heads-police-too-dancing-to-islamic-edicts-where-is-the-west-headed-addendum-to-western-dhimmis-bow-again-to-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

So where is this all headed? If not beaten back, the chopping of the First Amendment (and other Constitutional rights) is on the block – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/22/first-amendment-rights-on-the-chopping-block-via-criminalizing-criticism-of-islam-addendum-to-shariah-law-its-silencing-of-all-dissent-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

Incredibly, the same band of anti-American thugs, described above, must now be thwarted, as they force a mega-mosque upon an outraged community! The only way to deter them is through an equally major push back, directly aimed at Islamists and radical leftists.

‘DOJ Forces Mega-Mosque on Norwalk, CT Community’

Sun, December 23, 2012

by:

Ryan Mauro

Residents of the area of the proposed mosque were not bigoted; they were worried about traffic and safety. (Screenshot: wtnh.com)The Al-Madany Islamic Center of Norwalk in Connecticut wasn’t ready to give up when its proposal for a 27,000 square foot facility was turned down by the zoning commission over matters completely unrelated to religion. The Islamic Center sued, asserting—as you might have guessed—it was religious discrimination. The cry of “Islamophobia” got the Justice Department on its side, and the zoning commission suddenly changed its mind after a closed session.

The current Islamic Center was established in 1999 and serves 100 families. Feeling that more space was needed, the Center purchased the property in 2008 and made the $3.5 million proposal in the spring of 2010. It calls for a facility with an 80 foot minaret to serve as a community center and mosque, including eight classrooms, two libraries, three offices, a kitchen, a gymnasium and other rooms. It has a capacity for 1,000 people.

The proposal was rejected in June. The officials and residents that opposed it never referenced Islam and repeatedly emphasized that religion had nothing to do with it.

Mayor Richard Moccia said, “It was not based on any religious bias.” Commissioner Adam Blank said community centers are not allowed in triple AAA residential zones. Additionally, he said, parking was only allocated for the prayer hall that is 3,000 square feet, leaving the rest without parking.

Isabelle Harqgrove of “the “Keep 127 Fillow Street Residential” was concerned about increased traffic and its potential to “fundamentally alter the character of this quiet, New England neighborhood.” Local resident Brian Dough complained at a public hearing about the already heavy traffic in the morning.

“I don’t want to live near a Wal-Mart or a 27,000 square foot building, and I don’t think anyone in the neighborhood does. There’s no room, and this is huge,” he said.

Israel Herskowitz of the Stonegate Condominium Association that opposes the projectsaid, “The reason why it was rejected is it’s too big a development for too small a property … That would be the same if it was a church, or it was a synagogue.”

The Center rebutted by presenting a traffic study that projected that only 100 people and 50 cars would arrive for Friday prayer services. It also offered to help reduce traffic on special holidays by holding two services and hiring a police officer to direct traffic. The zoning commissionA drawing of the proposed Islamic center (Screenshot: wtnh.com) chairmanwas skeptical of the traffic study because it didn’t include the rear building. The Center claims that it will not use both buildings at the same time.

When the zoning commission ruled against the Center, the Center responded with a lawsuit, accusing it of anti-Muslim bias. Even one supporter of the Center’s proposal, Rabbi Jon Fish of Congregation Beth El, felt it was a dirty tactic.

“We all have problems with parking and space. It’s clear that the people who are concerned for their neighborhood are also good Americans, who also care a great deal about the diversity of our community. No one should be cast as a bigot,” he said.

Nonetheless, the “Islamophobia” accusation got the Justice Department to start an investigation. On November 29, the zoning commission had a private meeting andapproved the proposal “subject to an agreement depending on the terms of a final settlement.”

Herskowitz decried the “backroom politics” that left him and other residents out of the process. “We don’t know what’s in this proposed settlement. It’s frustrating,” he said. His group has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to find out.

All the Center had to do was claim discrimination for the Justice Department to intimidate local officials on its behalf. If a church didn’t get what it wanted from a zoning commission and accused it of “Christophobia,” would the Justice Department have intervened?

Few words are as powerful as “Islamophobia.” It preys upon the emotions of Americans disgusted by genuine acts of anti-Muslim bigotry. It tempts the politicians concerned about their public image. For Islamists uncomfortable with legitimate questions, it moves the conversation to victimization. And, as we now know, it compels the Justice Department to help get your mosque approved.”

www.radicalislam.org/analysis/cry-islamophobia-and-win/#fm

Orwell’s universe…Alice-in-Wonderland’s looking glass too…are apt descriptions  where patriotic Americans find themselves; outside looking in, as their beloved nation implodes from internal and external forces. Not only from the Islamic enemy “hiding in plain sight” but from the helping hands of those tasked to protect them! 

And since democracy is not a suicide pact, it behooves Americans to internalize the left’s mechanism for enforcement of their totalitarian thrust, as they aid and abet their Islamist helpmates – one bugaboo at a time. 

“Islamophobia”, their latest weapon of choice.

The Violation of ‘Due Process’ In Western Democracies…A Precursor To Tyranny…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
1

A western based democracy can’t claim to adhere to the rule of law without upholding ‘due process’. One needn’t be a lawyer to know this for a (legal) fact, but having access to some of the most astute legal minds in U.S. and Israeli  (specializing in international law) circles does have its advantages, especially in matters which require deeper delving. The point being, no one with a straight face can deny that a lack of ‘due process’ isn’t a deal breaker; a death kneel to democracy as well as to the rule of law.

And since ‘due process’ is joined at the hip with the U.S. Constitution, then undoubtedly its violation is doubly deleterious – legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Substantive+Due+Process. But since the ascent of Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the Presidency there have been more violations to the rule of law than at any time in U.S. history – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. More than enough evidence to choke a horse. An anti-American trail blazer.

But it is not as if Israel is free of their own ‘legal’ lawbreakers, and this blogger has first hand evidence. Now, don’t go thinking that yours truly has a sketchy past, but her writings have taken her straight to the underbelly. Several reliable sources grant her access, as necessary.

IF proofs are needed, take a peek within ‘administrative detention’ (against Jewish nationalists) as it tells the gory tale  – www.freeman.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/475-ADMINISTRATIVE-DETENTION-ORDERS-AGAINS-JEWISH-NATIONALISTS.html….but this is only a partial rendering which could be (safely) written about, and more than one insider confirmed its contents. The burdens patriots have to bear.

But closer to America’s shores, and of special interest to the readership, are egregious violations against ‘due process’, repeatedly towards those who question ‘The One’s’ bonafides. To catch readers up to snuff, Larry Klayman, Founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch – previously, an ex Prosecutor for the Justice Department – knows his way around said violations. Here is his latest update:

‘CERTIFIGATE: THE JUDICIAL GRINCH WHO STOLE DUE PROCESS’

Exclusive: Larry Klayman whacks judge who dismissed eligibility challenge

Just when I thought I’d seen almost everything among the judiciary, along comes Judge Kevin J. Carroll of the Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Fla., the venue in Tallahassee where my client, a Democrat, Michael Voeltz, again challenged Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be president following the Nov. 6 elections. Voeltz’s previous challenges were effectively held to have been premature by two colleagues of Judge Carroll. While Voeltz and I strongly disagree with these decisions and have them on appeal, out of abundance of caution and to squarely contest Obama’s re-election, we decided to file yet a third challenge after the election. Under Florida law, Voeltz has a clear-cut, unbridled right to challenge both Obama’s fraudulent representations that he was born in the United States and is thus a natural born citizen eligible to be president, as well as the simple issue of whether he is eligible even in the absence of fraud.

Florida Statutes Section 102.168 Contest of Election provides in relevant part:

(1) … the certification of election or nomination of any person to office, or of the result of any question submitted by referendum, may be contested in the circuit court by an unsuccessful candidate for such office or nomination thereto or by any elector (i.e. Voeltz) qualified to vote in the election related to such candidacy, or by any taxpayer (i.e. Voeltz), respectively (for): …

(3) (a) Misconduct, fraud or corruption …

(4) (b) Ineligibility of the successful candidate for the nomination or office in dispute.

Thus, Voeltz as an elector and taxpayer under Florida law, has an absolute right to file an election contest over Obama’s eligibility to qualify for the office of the president. Florida’s law is the strongest in the nation on this issue.

When this latest case was assigned to Judge Carroll – a Republican appointed by a “Republican” governor, Rick Scott, coincidentally to fill the judicial vacancy in Leon County that occurred when one of the few truly great judges in the nation, Judge Sanders Sauls, retired (Sauls was the Florida judge who presided over and decided the famous Gore v. Bush case in 2000, a trial I participated in while head of Judicial Watch) – I held out some hope that the rule of law might now prevail. I was wrong.

Without even permitting Voeltz to have a hearing on his complaint, after Judge Carroll had ruled that we could request one – which we did timely – Carroll panicked when he saw that we meant business and were prepared to bring witnesses, such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio, private investigator Mike Zullo and renowned investigative reporter and award-winning author Jerome Corsi to the hearing to testify, under oath, with hard evidence, that Obama’s claimed birth certificate is fraudulent (as well as many of his other identifying documents), and he was thus not born in the United States or its territories and thus not eligible to be president. (See www.freedomwatchusa.org to view sworn declarations of these witnesses.)

We requested that this evidentiary hearing be set for the week between Christmas and News Year’s, since time is short before Congress will meet to tally the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2013 – but Judge Carroll apparently decided that he did not want to be “inconvenienced” during the holiday season. Without giving us an opportunity to have this hearing, he instead rushed, within hours of our having requested the hearing, to issue a brief and hastily written two and a half page “Order Dismissing Complaint,” lest he suffer a judicial heart attack at having to seriously preside further over a case that could remove Obama from the body politic of the nation and the world.

Here is part of what he said in denying Voeltz, the people of Florida and the nation a chance – known in both the U.S. and Florida constitutions to be “due process of law” – to be fully heard in order that he could weigh the considerable evidence of fraud and ineligibility and render a reasoned and just decision:

“We are now presented with Voeltz III. This Court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses, and meets with Congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world. President Obama’s recent appointment of The Honorable Mark Walker, formerly a member of this Court, has been confirmed by the United States Senate. Judge Walker has been sworn in as a United States District Court Judge and currently works at the Federal Courthouse down the street. The Electoral College has recently done its work and elected Mr. Obama to be president once again. [This is wrong!] As this matter has come before the Court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film ‘Miracle on 34th St.’ ‘Since the United States Government declares this man to be President, this Court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.’”

Whatever Judge Carroll’s motive in dismissing Voeltz’ case without providing due process of law – for example, perhaps like his buddy he wants to be nominated for a higher federal judgeship – this jurist has not only violated his oath of office to obey the U.S. and Florida constitutions, but subverted the rule of law generally.

Our greatest Founding Father and second American president, John Adams, in arguing successfully for the Declaration of Independence, stressed that the new nation, unlike the British crown, was to be a country of laws and not men. In the face of this, Judge Carroll apparently believes that he, as part of the establishment judicial club, can do as he pleases without legal consequences.

Notwithstanding our forthcoming appeal of this dismissal, Judge Carroll and our other so-called public servants, who have brought us to the brink of revolution with their disregard for the constitutional rights of We the People, are about to learn otherwise.

This will be “Judicial Grinch” Carroll’s lawful gift from us this Christmas”.

Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/the-judicial-grinch-who-stole-due-process/#vOBRul4sdQQkQilZ.99

Yours truly has her own ideas about the above findings but most importantly, one needn’t be a lawyer to intuit when a basic Constitutional right is being violated, for whatever political reason – left or right.

A radical administration which compromises the separation of powers, in effect, leads its judiciary off the (legal) cliff and creates an imperiled nation. When citizens with absolute ‘legal standing’ have their enshrined rights to ‘due process’ violated, regardless of their opinions on this One or that One, the entire legal process falls apart. 

Western based democracy simply can’t withstand the evisceration of ‘due process’; the epicenter of rule of law. Simple as that.

 

The Nexus Between Cover Ups: Benghazigate Mirror Image Of Fast & Furious…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
4

The same thugs-in-suits who ran guns through Mexico – killing a Border Agent and scores of kids in Mexico too – are guilty of covering up the BIGGEST gun running/weapons smuggling operation in US history.

And these goons would have Americans (and others too) believe that the kiddies in Newtown are their paramount concern; as they hide behind their cold, dead bodies to ram through gun control, contrary to the Second Amendment! Does it get any more twisted than that; those responsible for scores of deaths of youngsters in Mexico (‘Eric Holder Buries Another Fast And Furious Victim’- www.westernjournalism.com/eric-holder-buries-another-fast-and-furious-victim/) due to another deadly operation – Fast & Furious – also designed to grab American’s guns, are again spitting on the dead. They understand that an armed guard/administrator/teacher would have spared the carnage! And it was their decision to gut the funding, not once but twice, for school safety revamping.

Devils.

So, as Obama and his radical/racialist AG hustle to ‘legalize’ the gutting of the Second Amendment, one has to ask: what will it take to finally bring down this unlawful duo? adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. And this blogger is not the only one attempting to hold their feet to the fire. Not at all.

‘Another Benghazi / Fast and Furious parallel? State Department employees not allowed to talk’

by  on DECEMBER 13, 2012 

The parallels between Operation Fast and Furious and the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi continue to mount. The latest example comes courtesy of Kerry Picket. She is reporting that Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who serves on the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, says the State Department is not allowing him to talk to any of the survivors of the Benghazi attack.

Via Bretibart:

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R- UT) told Breitbart News on Wednesday that he has been “thwarted” by the State Department from seeing any Americans who survived the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in  Benghazi. Many people forget that there were Americans who survived the Benghazi attack, some of whom were badly injured and are still recovering.

“My understanding is that we still have some people in the hospital. I’d like to visit with them and wish them nothing but the best but the State Department has seen it unfit for me to know who those people are—or even how many there are,” Rep. Chaffetz said. I don’t know who they are. I don’t know where they live. I don’t know what state they’re from. I don’t even know how many there are. It doesn’t seem right to me.

So, how is this reminiscent of how the Fast and Furious investigation was handled?

Understand how history repeats itself with today’s persecution of Christians in Islamic countries and compare to the plight of the Jews in Nazi Occupied Europe, click her for details.

Consider the names Kevin O’Reilly and William Newell. When the DOJ / ATF – led Operation Fast and Furious was at its peak, there were communications between Newell and O’Reilly, who at the time was Director of North American Affairs with the National Security Council (the White House). If one ATF employee could be placed at the center of Fast and Furious, Newell might be that guy.

Here is a very compelling exchange between Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Newell from July 26, 2011 in which Gowdy confronts the former SAC about an email between O’Reilly and Newell. Shortly after this exchange, O’Reilly was transferred to Iraq to work as a State Department employee:

Obviously, after O’Reilly’s name was brought into the Fast and Furious scandal, Oversight Committee chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) wanted to talk to him. Here is an exchange between Issa and Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier a couple of months after the July 26th hearing:

More than one year later, O’Reilly returned from Iraq to work at the State Department.

Via CNS News:

Obama administration employee Kevin O’Reilly — who congressional investigators called “the link connecting the White House to the [Fast and Furious] scandal” — is back in the United States now after abruptly leaving his White House job to work in Iraq in 2011 after emails concerning him and Fast and Furious had surfaced.

O’Reilly left the United States in August 2011, shortly after his knowledge of the gun-walking program was publicized during a congressional hearing on July 26.

O’Reilly has so far refused to cooperate with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which recently threatened to subpoena him. He also refused to cooperate with the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General, which investigated the program and recently released its findings.

Both the House committee and the Inspector General’s office sought to interview O’Reilly about Fast and Furious but the White House refused to grant him permission to be interviewed.

Another curious bit of timing involved the release of the DOJ’s Inspector General report just weeks before O’Reilly’s return from Iraq, meaning that O’Reilly left for Iraq shortly after he became a person of interest for the Oversight Committee and returned shortly after the DOJ IG issued its final report. Despite this, the White House said that was all coincidence:

In August 2011 — after the e-mails were first discussed at a July 26 congressional hearing — O’Reilly was named as the senior director of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Programs in Iraq, a State Department position.

“Unsung Davids”, a new and powerful book tells the story of ten modern-day heroes who fought tyranny and evil but are given little or no recognition. Click Here for more details.

The State Department official told CNSNews.com that O’Reilly’s reassignment to Iraq from the White House “was a standard foreign service career rotation that had been planned for months in advance of his detail to the NSS.” The State Department could not confirm O’Reilly’s new title at the State Department.

So, what do Kevin O’Reilly and the survivors of the 9/11/12 attack in Benghazi have in common? All are State Department employees (presumptively); all were somehow connected to operations that involved the murder of American officials; and all are being prevented from speaking to Congressional committees who want and deserve answers.

http://shoebat.com/2012/12/13/another-benghazi-fast-and-furious-parallel-state-department-employees-not-allowed-to-talk/

Adding insult to grievous injury and pointed towards the direction of the American people, along comes another Capitol Hill investigation to get to the truth, but nothing of the sort is afoot. Far from it.

‘The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report’ – Douglas Hagmann
“Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could it be more insulting to their memory, their families and to the intelligence of the American public.19 December 2012: Under the cover of the Newtown school shooting, an “independent” five member investigative panel quietly released an unclassified, 39-page report Tuesday night, detailing their findings of the attack that led to the murder of four Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. The report cites five main reasons for the loss of life, all primarily related to inadequate security for U.S. personnel.

However, the independent panel found that no “U.S. Government employee engaged in misconduct or willfully ignored his or her responsibilities, and, therefore did not find reasonable cause to believe that an individual breached his or her duty so as to be the subject of a recommendation for disciplinary action.” Stated another way, no one is to blame nor will be held accountable for the murders of Americans Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods, and Ambassador Chris Stevens., so just continue about your business.

The report was released in advance of closed door congressional testimony scheduled for today by two senior panel members, retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Mike Mullen. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was also scheduled to testify this week, but has declined to do so as a result of her recent fainting spell. Others are unavailable to testify or have not been asked, which is a common tactic when the outcome of an investigation is fixed from the beginning, and this, based on an extensive review of all available evidence, most certainly was.

2012 Game show panel: To Tell The Truth

It is an interesting bit of trivia, perhaps, that the popular television game show To Tell the Truthpremiered exactly 56 years to the day that the Benghazi report was released. The objective of the 2012 real world panel appears to be the antithesis of former game show, as ferreting out the truth did not appear to be the panel’s objective.

The panel report offers nothing more than obligatory eye candy in the form of a stinging rebuke of State Department management and leadership failures that led to the murder of four Americans. The panel deliberately convolutes the pertinent issues with unrelated historical accounts of security issues in Libya dating back to 1967, giving the reader a sense of thoroughness while leaving the main issues untouched by design.

Ironically, the report opens with a 1905 quote from George Santayanna: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”  Included perhaps to add legitimacy and a veneer of integrity to an investigative report unworthy of such a definition, it is an insult to those aware of the actual events leading up to the murderous attacks of 9/11.

To understand how the truth behind the murders and the events of the attack is being buried amid familiar terms and talking points suitable for both political parties and their spokespeople, it is vital to understand the origin and makeup of the “independent” panel. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton convened the Accountability Review Board (ARB) in the wake of the attacks, quietly appointing retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering to chair and direct the panel. His appointment unceremoniously appeared in the October 4, 2012 edition of the Federal Register.

As noted in a previous report by this author, Thomas Pickering is an obvious choice to direct an investigation that could have any negative implications to Iran or this administration’s associations with the Muslim Brotherhood. Pickering is an advisory board member of the pro-Iranian organization known as the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), and co-chairman of the board of directors of the International Crisis Group (ICG), whose executive committee includes the infamous George Soros. Pickering is also vice-chairman of Hills & Co., global consultants founded in 1993 by CFR and Trilateral Commission member Carla Anderson Hills.

The significance of Pickering’s appointment cannot be overstated or underestimated considering that the trail of blood from four Americans leads directly to Ansar al Sharia, a terrorist group funded by Iran. Who better to redirect or cover up the operational conspiracy that exists between Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton and that Muslim Brotherhood that exists at the core of the 9/11 attack? Pickering is the obvious choice.

From the untouched to the absurd

Left untouched by the Pickering panel are the intrinsically sinister machinations of Obama, Jarrett and Clinton, as they as are methodically taking us to the brink of a new war in Syria through their weapons running operations in Benghazi. The report intentionally offered only a very narrow view of the events in Benghazi, limiting their scope to the already exposed security deficiencies that were secondary to the redefined Benghazi “consulate.” Using this tactic effectively diverts attention away from the real issue and thus, the actual cause for the attack.

Beyond the narrow focus of the security issues and the subsequent inconsequential wrist slap, the investigative panel descends further into the abyss of absurdity and insult by incredibly asserting that everything possible had been done to rescue and save our Ambassador and Sean Smith, and further asserted that “the interagency response was timely and appropriate, but there was simply not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference.”

That finding alone should alarm every thinking American based on open source intelligence and what is known, as well as what has yet to be disclosed. Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could it be more insulting to families of the dead and to the intelligence of the American public.

Perhaps Pickering and his cadre of co-conspirators would like to disclose to the American people the strange odyssey of a certain C-130 aircraft that left Croatia to Libya to provide assistance to the Americans under siege at the onset of the attack. The portal-to-portal flight time is about four hours, yet it did not officially “appear” on site for 23 hours. Perhaps it’s time to address the fact that the lie is different at every level, and for Pickering to stop being a firewall between his bosses and the truth owed to every American, and particularly to the families of those who were murdered.

It’s time to ask whether the crew of that C-130 was ever identified and interviewed. It’s time to locate and ask the personnel on board that aircraft how long it was, after they changed from their military uniforms into their street clothes to enact a rescue, were they forced to wait while the embattled Americans endured the attack and met their deaths. Oh yes, there is information known and crying out to be made public despite the contempt for the truth and equally important, the contempt for the American people by Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and Valerie Jarrett.

Four Americans were murdered in Benghazi. Over forty thousand are dead in Syria. Soon, it will be four million dead as a result of the hidden agenda of our elected leaders, the complicity of a corrupt media, and the complacency of a brainwashed public. Today we cry over the deaths in Newtown, but tomorrow, our sobs will be for the masses.”

www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/7285 …and the scapegoating begins- www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/19/benghazi-report_n_2330924.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing6%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D247744.

Their criminality and subterfuge is so out-sized in scope, the chief culprits understand that revelations, via private and public hearings, would lock them  up for life.

And this is why they will pull out all stops to keep the truth from seeping through, but it in no way obligates millions of patriotic Americans to go along with their subterfuge. And a million (or more) person march on Washington is not out of the question either. It’s at least as important as the ‘Million Man’ march cobbled together through Black hucksters not too long ago. You think?