Islam & Barbarism – Literally…Airplane Dry Runs Too…Addendum To Islam & Blood…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Some topics are too horrifying, even for individuals whose inner constitutions appear stronger than most. Imagine the reaction from those with more delicate sensibilities, upon hearing that cannibalism is certified “kosher”, and from the most authoritative Islamic university in the world. You read it right. Yes, eating humans for breakfast, lunch, dinner, or any snack in between is…halal-approved! A real Islamic delicacy.

Oh boy…where to begin…if not here…then where else….if not now, when? Along this vein, many readers have availed themselves of a policy paper posted at this blog, one which this American-Israeli had the unique privilege to work on. It is groundbreaking, in all ways that matter, and has been downloaded too many times to count. Thank G-d. Its historical, theological and philosophical scholarship is second to none. And this is NO exaggeration.

But for the new readers, plus those who have yet to partake, time to jump on board. It will explain the unfathomable, the inexplicable and horrifying “news” presented above, but people should realize that one is the outgrowth of the other. “Islam & Its Relationship To Blood” allows for the eating of human beings/”infidels” –

Once internalized, the following won’t appear too fantastical to understand. Knowledge IS power.

‘Syrian rebel video-taped cutting out soldier’s heart’

DEBKAfile May 14, 2013, 12:18 PM (GMT+02:00)

The pro-Syrian opposition Human Rights Watch identified the rebel as Abu Sakkar, head of the Independent Omar al-Farouq Brigade from the town of Homs and said his actions, including taking a bite out of the soldier’s heart, were a war crime. He declared: “I swear to God we will eat your hearts and your livers, you soldiers of Bashar the dog.” The main opposition coalition said Sakkar would be put on trial.
The tape has stirred widespread condemnation, drowning out rebel warnings that the Syrian army is on the point of perpetrating a massacre in Homs.

And do view this supporting video re said “delicious delights”, Islamic style!…h/t – Joseph Ezkosheez.

‘Islam and Cannibalism’

by  on JANUARY 28, 2013 

By Walid and Theodore Shoebat

In the future, the Egyptian Islamists will not only be conducting systematic violence, but cannibalism against Christians and moderates.

In a recent video interview, one Egyptian scholar exposed the high school curriculum coming from Al-Azhar university, the most reputable of all Islamic schools, showing that it condoned cannibalizing non-Muslims:

We allowed the eating of the flesh of dead humans… under necessary conditions. It [dead human flesh] must not be cooked or grilled to avoid Haram (wrongdoing) …and he can kill a murtadd (apostate) and eat him

The interviewer commented:

The book that is being taught to general high-school students mentions that those who don’t pray can be grilled & then eaten


Al-Azhar finds their support for cannibalism in Islamic authority. According toAl-Shafie, who is considered to be the founder of Islamic jurisprudence:

One may eat the flesh of a human body. It is not allowed to kill a Muslim nor a free non-Muslim under Muslim rule (because he is useful for the society), nor a prisoner because he belongs to other Muslims. But you may kill an enemy fighter or an adulterer and eat his body (716 in volume 1, Al-Kortoby)

And where did Obama give his 2009 speech in Egypt, which empowered the Muslim Brotherhood? Al-Azhar.

The scholar also added that the support for cannibalism from Al-Azhar will give the justification for “the establishment of committees for Promotion of Virtue & Prevention of Vice that’ll carry out this stuff [i.e. cannibalism]

In Egypt there is an Islamic mafia called Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice Authority, which is the exact name of the moral police in Saudi Arabia. They roam the streets assaulting, or even killing, those whom they speculate to be apostates. On November of 2012 a number of these mobsters entered the shop of Ahmed Gharib to use the bathroom, and when the owner told them that they had to ask for permission before using the restroom, they responded with: “we do not ask for permission”.

A few minutes later thirty bearded men entered the shop to “discipline him for insulting a religious figure,” and attempted to cut off Gharib’s hand, but he escaped with deep wounds. Gharib’s brother, angered by what they had done, insulted the mob, and so he was then seized and ordered to have his tongue severed off. But he too fled.

Egypt’s new constitution already establishes that the nation will be having a Saudi style Sharia police which will be implementing not only this sort of violence, but the eating of human flesh. Morsi’s coming ‘moral’ mafia and mere Egyptian individuals will be given the power to partake in such barbarism.

In fact, the constitution also mandates that any Islamic edict coming from the government must first go through Al-Azhar university scholars. This means that the okay for cannibalism will be observed in Egypt.

Last year, I wrote an article on how Egyptian society is becoming more and more savage, and how the Egyptian people are becoming like zombies. I wrote on how a butcher in Egypt killed his wife, flayed her flesh off the bone, and put it for sale as lamb in his market.

Now with Al-Azhar’s blessing, we are going to be seeing more of this type of violence. But why is this happening? While many people see Islam as a morally conservative religion, akin to Christianity and Judaism, they don’t understand that Islam is Satanic, and of no different spirit than any other pagan religion.

Egypt is merely going back to its heathen roots. In Ancient Egypt human sacrifice was followed by ritual cannibalism. On the temple of Edifu, all lands foreign to Egypt are pictured as being under the feet of the pharaoh, as four men, their arms bounded, are about to be ritually sacrificed. As the sacrificial victims are awaiting their deaths, a person hovers over them, reciting the “Book of the Subduing of the Nobility”. This rite was a part of an annual fertility ritual, the depictions of which have netted birds, fish, and mortals, as representing the enemies of the pharaoh–Asiatics, Beduin, Nubians, and others–which were to be eaten for “breakfast, lunch, and supper.” By consuming the flesh of their enemies, the Egyptians believed that they would absorb their desired qualities. (1)

Cannibalism continued on in Egypt even after the Christian Era, and regardless of Islam prevailing over the country, it was still prevalently practiced. In 1148, as Rudwan, a criminal, was fleeing for his freedom from the authorities, he was slain in front of the palace of the Khalifa. His head was cut off, and his body mutilated into little pieces only for them to be eaten by Egyptian soldiers in their infernal belief that they would absorb the courage of the victim. (2)

Cannibalism was practiced throughout the ancient Near East. In the Christian era the heathens of pre-Islamic Lebanon seized Cyril, a deacon of Heliopolis who despised heathenism, killed him, teared open his stomach and ate his liver. (3) These pagans did this because Cyril was Christian, and so will we see this being done by the Muslims toward the Copts.

And if one thinks that the Muslim have evolved into a modern mindset, one must remember what took place in Ramallah in which two Israeli soldiers were beaten and tortured to death, their bodies thrown down a window to the sounds of “Allahu Akbar”, and their flesh then chewed by the crowd.

Arabs waving entrails of butchered Israelis in Ramallah

Muslims in Ramallah held body parts of Israeli while they cried out “I eat the flesh of my occupier!”

This savagery will be taking place in Egypt, but his time at a much wider scale.”

The Ramallah lynching (cited above) will NEVER be forgotten nor forgiven, and its detailed link can be found within the following commentary. Mind you, these are the same beasts the world wants Israel to “gift/concede” Israel’s heartland to…carving the heart out of the Jewish patrimony – As such, a must read, to further the educational process.

IF the readers can still see straight, another guidepost will round out what the west is facing, finally realizing that Muslim blood lust is endless and boundless, regardless how many westerners prefer to avert the truth –

Now, if your heart can take another dose of reality, here is one for the jihadi books, but western dhimmis refuse to report it. As such, here it goes, courtesy of this American-Israeli, and her associate, Professor Paul Eidelberg, a patriot like few others –

‘Reason or Moral Suasion Will Not Do’ 

Syrian-born Dr. Wafa Sultan, who now lives in America, had the courage to say that Islam is not a civilization.


Philosopher Lee Harris, who rejects cultural relativism, deems Islam an “enemy of civilization.”  By civilization he means a standard that can be applied across cultures and history. Civilization requires three basic ingredients: (1) the co-operation of individuals pursuing their own interests, (2) the ability to tolerate or socialize with one’s neighbors, and (3) a hatred of violence.

It follows from these considerations that insofar as the behavior of Muslims is consistent with their regarding non-Muslims as “dogs” and “pigs,” they cannot be dealt with by reason or moral suasion. Hence, to safeguard the rights of decent people–and some may be unfaithful Muslims–faithful Muslims can only be dealt with effectively by means of force.
Subject:  Cancelled Flight
This is very interesting how the Muslim world is taking over slowly by their terrorism. What would you have done? Let’s all start standing up for our rights! Please read the entire story. We should be very, very scared about this!


 In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now.

Read Tedd  Petruna’s story below.

Can you imagine, our own news media now are so politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all Muslims?

Tedd Petruna is a diver at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at NASA  Houston.

Tedd happened to be on the AirTran Flight 297, from Atlanta to Houston.

Here’s his report:

 “One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my father. On Tuesday, the 17th, I returned home. If you read the papers the 18th you  may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was cancelled from   Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell phone  before take- off. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT what  really happened.

 I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the plane  in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest seated  themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to the back.  As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave the safety  spiel that we are all so familiar with.

 At that time, one of the men, in 1st class, got on his cell and called one  of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone in  Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took the 1st  stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that cell phones  were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she were not there.  The man, who answered the phone back in the coach section, did the same  and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further back in the plane, at the  same time, two younger Muslims, one in the back on the aisle, and one  sitting in front of him by the window, began to show footage of a porno  video they had taped the night before. They were very loud about it.

 The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have any  electronic devices on at this time. One of the men said “shut up infidel  dog!”

 The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to  scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the men  got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that because of  the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was something  amiss and changed the plane’s directions to head back to the terminal.

 The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st class, when I heard a voice behind me, from another Texan twice my size, say “I got your  back.”

Then I grabbed the man, who had been on the cell phone, by the arm and said “You WILL sit down in your seat or you WILL be thrown from this  plane!”

As I “led” him around me to take his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his waist and headed him back to  his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and said, “You WILL do the same!”

 He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going to  go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the doors  opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered the cabin.  Myself and my new Texas friend were told to cease and desist for they had the situation under control. I was quite happy to oblige actually.

There was still some sort of  commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage unloaded. We  talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it had happened.


Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim men!  Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe It) they were re-seated.

The stewardess from the back had been in tears and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it!

Since I was up front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents that there was NO  WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men.

The agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through their luggage with a  fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston .

 The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent, “We  and our crew will not fly this plane!”

After a word or two, the entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane.

Five minutes later, the cabin door  opened again and a whole new crew walked on.

Again, this was where I had  had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, “What the hell is going on?

I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the delay  and we would be home shortly. I said “I’m getting off this plane”.

The  stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to get off.

Now I’m  really mad! I said “I am a grown man who bought this ticket, who’s time is  mine with a family at home and I am going through that door, or I’m going  through that door with you under my arm, but I AM going through that  door!”

And then I heard a voice behind me say “So am I!”

Then everyone behind us started to get up and say the same thing.

Within two minutes, I was  walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents who asked me to  write a statement about the incident.

I had five hours to kill at this point waiting for the next flight to Houston, so why the hell not give  them my statement.

Due to the amount of people who got off that flight, it  was cancelled.

I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM, but I finally got  there at 12:30 AM. If you don’t believe this, look up the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to Houston .

If this wasn’t a terrorism dry run, I don’t know what one is.

The  terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would handle it, and how the passengers would handle it.

I’m telling this to you because I want you to know.

The threat IS real. I saw it with my own  eyes.”


To wit, without an Islamic reformation the above is what generations of Americans have to look forward to –

And while this blogger would also rather pretend what is isn’t, she knows what it means to bury ones head in the sand. History tells the gory tales and won’t allow for pie-in-the-sky dreaming. Besides, future generations – all of ours – won’t be so forgiving.

We owe them better!

What Happens When Terrorists Hide Behind Democracy, “Martyrdom” & Revolution? Scores Of Innocents Die…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Placing lipstick on a pig doesn’t change its appearance. Not even for a nanosecond. But when it comes to the ever “aggrieved” pet jihadis of the international community – the Palestinians – there is no amount of barbarism which will dent their “victimhood” status. None at all. 

They can head chop, throat slit and awash themselves in Jewish and infidel blood, but no matter. They are still considered “innocent”. A world gone mad.

Some may even recall the following unimaginable act of blood lust, while others may not. But if one act of cannibal-like behavior embodies their orgasmic relationship with blood, this one is for the jihadi books  – However, this blogger implores her readers to take a peek within on an empty stomach, she doesn’t want it on her conscience if something or other gets upchucked. You’ve been warned.

But it is not as if their above bonding with blood is an enigma, a one off. Far from it. Again, readers may be familiar with this commentary/policy paper but if not, acquaint yourselves. It is the biggest lesson, and gift, of all, Islam & Blood  –

Couple it with the knowledge that Muslim sanctioned Sharia Law embodies their  boundless blood lust –…and the heretofore inexplicable will become (horrifically) explicable.

Now don’t get yours truly started on the PA/Fatah/PLO mastermind, none other than the Nobel Peace Prize winning, godfather of modern terrorism, “Chairman” Arafat. The readership hardly needs any edification on his bloody history. His infamy precedes him. May he rot in hell.

Yet it is intrinsic to let the public know that its rival terror half, Hamas, the other side of the PA state coin, are the progeny of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Significantly, there is not one Muslim terror group which has not spawned from the Brotherhood’s terror-laden loins, Al Qaeda included. 

Here’s a brief overview of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s plans for America, but they aim for other westerners too- such, the entire Palestinian terror hydra’s “activities” are as dangerous to those outside Israel, as much as they are within the Middle East, including the “darling” PA terrorists.

Cutting to the heart of the matter, let us now join the master of international law, via his latest op-ed, as he ties Palestinian terror to international law; PA statehood to its place among civilized nations; and the banners under which jihadi terrorists “martyr” themselves, hidden behind the guise of democracy and revolution. Oh what a tangled terror web they weave.

‘Op-Ed: Convenient Masquerade: “Martyrdom” in the Middle East’

Published: Saturday, December 29, 2012
Democracy, revolution and “martyrdom” are words that have hidden meanings in the Jihadic resurgence which we are witnessing.

Prof. Louis René Beres (cited herein too –

Louis René Beres, Ph.D., Princeton

For just a fleeting moment, Palestinian terrorism may have been quieted by the Palestinian Authority’s recent UN-approved end-run around normal legal rules.

Newly upgraded in status by the General Assembly to “Non-member Observer State,” the PA, together with its reluctant Hamas partners in Gaza, will no longer have to fulfill ordinary requirements of the Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (the Montevideo Convention, 1934), or the binding Oslo Agreements with Israel. Paradoxically, and via the “good offices” of the United Nations, Palestinian statehood is now being brought about not by authoritative international law, but by flagrantly contrived diplomatic fiat.

Still, in time, Palestinian inclinations to Jihad and “martyrdom” will inevitably resurface, and so, too, will similar sentiments in certain neighboring Arab countries. Notwithstanding earlier and possibly latent movements toward democracy in the region, originally, the so-called “Arab Spring,” current expressions of revolutionary fervor are apt to deteriorate rapidly into new forms of Islamic dictatorship and Islamist rule. This is already most obvious in Mohammed Morsi’s Egypt, and it is plainly foreseeable in post-Assad Syria.

As for Israel, it must finally be apparent that the Jewish State, since its very beginnings in May 1948, has been a readily convenient scapegoat for several successive and retrograde Arab tyrannies. Always, to be sure, the truest enemy of the Arab peoples has been their own deeply-corrupted and incompetent leaderships. Indeed, if only the Arabs had immediately embraced rather than assaulted Israel – a perfectly rational embrace that would have been welcomed by all Israelis – the Arabs would have benefited enormously. Moreover, these considerable benefits would have been experienced on several levels; politically, intellectually, medically, scientifically, and materially.

In world politics, what is real, is not always rational. Because of endless manipulation by the Arab governments, demonization of Israel, not a gainfully symbiotic embrace, became de rigueur from the start. Now, following multiple and often inter-dependent revolutionary eruptions across the Arab world, Israel will likely remain in the self-destructive cross-hairs of still-irrational regional foes. More specifically, Islamist forces, some long suppressed, will continue to surface and seek power across the area. Willing “martyrs” in an ongoing Jihad, these more-or-less disciplined and capable forces will expand with a vigorously renewed dedication to cruelty. Prudently, this re-dedication will be pleasingly masked in sanctimony.

Significantly, the results of this energetic re-dedication will be felt not only in the Arab world and Israel, but also in Europe, and in the United States. Some evident consequences of the Jihadist resurgence may quickly become visible not only in Cairo, Tripoli, and Damascus, but also in Tel-Aviv, London, and New York.

In Gaza, al-Qaeda, not to be outdone by newly-emergent Muslim Brotherhood elements that are presently coalescing throughout the Hamas-controlled strip, will accelerate its own commitment to “sacred” violence. For all Jihadist terrorists, here and elsewhere, violence and the sacred will remain mutually-reinforcing and conspicuously inseparable. In fact, among the Palestinian leadership these days, the commitment to sacred violence and martyrdom has taken an altogether bizarre and non-Islamic turn.

Openly attaching himself to Jesus, and to corollary ideas of Christian martyrdom, senior PA leader Jibril Rajoub said in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (November 30, 2012): “Jesus is a Palestinian; the self-sacrificing Yasser Arafat is a Palestinian; Mahmoud Abbas, themessenger of peace on earth is a Palestinian. How great is this nation of the Holy Trinity!”

So, for the PA leadership, Jesus was a “Palestinian.” We ought not be too surprised, therefore, that today’s headlines from the “revolutionary” or “democratizing” Middle East are often misleading and incomplete. At its core, Jihadist terrorism, now being grotesquely linked to Christian sacrifice, has very little to do with war, politics, or revolutionary resistance to oppression. The deeper meanings of these recurrent excursions into barbarism can be found less in rationally-calculated judgments of expedient tactics or strategy, than in personally passionate feelings of fear, dissatisfaction, cowardice, and ritualistic loathing.

Examined closely, these feelings include:

(1) a consuming, though unrecognized, horror of death (relieved for “martyrs” by a compelling promise of immortality);

(2) an unfulfilled wish for ecstasy, or an intense, time-limited pleasure;

(3) a satisfying and self-righteous joy, drawn from the presumptively mandatory targeting of all those who would “lack sacredness;” and, perhaps even more acutely after the fall of Mubarak and Kaddafi,

(4) an utterly abiding hatred of “apostates” and “infidels.”

In searching for authentic meanings of regional revolutionary fervor in the Middle East, the implications for Jihadist terrorism will never be fully discoverable in official declarations, charters, resolutions, or covenants. Nor will they be made more understandable in less formal Islamist diatribes. Obliquely, but profoundly, these genuine meanings will remain securely hidden in the incalculable sufferings that are inflicted by Jihadists upon both their past and future victims.

In Iraq, the indiscriminate car bomb is back in fashion. In Yemen, all sides to the endless internecine conflicts disregard the growing problems of hunger and utter starvation. In Syria, and elsewhere in this volatile region, especially “Palestine,” Jihadist terror will re-emerge with a “sacred” vengeance.

Seeking to express Shahada, or Death For Allah, the seemingly secular goals of revolutionary terror will create a convenient smokescreen for what are unalterably religious objectives. Incrementally, whenever feigned “democracy” appears to replace dictatorship, the tyranny of Islamism – even when it is linked perversely to Christian martyrdom – will become the eventual beneficiary.

At its heart, the civilizational problems of the Middle East are problems of human pain. Significantly, human language can never accurately describe agony. In this connection, the defiling horror of Jihadist terror-violence can never really be understood or felt by others. Expert commentaries notwithstanding, this particular horror can never be reduced to any tangible or measurable inventory of casualties.

All agony is incommunicable. In matters of Jihadist terror, therefore, quantification must always miss the point.

Even in the “new Middle East,” the anguish of new terror victims will not only defile language, it will also be language defiling. However, the sheer inexpressibility of pain, although never determinable by politics, revolution, or society, will still have expressible political, revolutionary, and societal outcomes. In the case of still-advancing Jihadist terrorism, it may even stand in the way of recognizing new Islamist violence as evil or unacceptable. Ironically, we may encounter, in this context, comfortingly romantic celebrations of Jihadist terrorism as a necessary expression of “democracy,” “revolution,” and “martyrdom.”

We must plainly understand that Jihadist terrorists are spurred on by the distinctly voluptuous and allegedly purifying satisfactions of planned sacred violence. Islamist suicide-bombers prepare carefully for their cathartic missions of pain and extinction largely because of the anticipated ecstasy. Drawn from a presumed religious obligation, this ecstasy, which rewards doubly because it is also “cleansing,” represents an almost exact reciprocal of the unendurable suffering to be borne by the intended victims.

For Jihadist suicide terrorists, both past and future, the death that is dutifully meted out to certain “profane” others is an abstraction. These victims, after all, lack sacredness. And in the unchanging Quranic concept of war, terrorizing the profane unbeliever who refuses to be dhimmi ( to accept Shari’a domination) is necessarily a desired end unto itself.

Physical pain within the human body can not only destroy ordinary language, it can also bring about a visceral reversion to pre-language human sounds, to those primal moans, cries and whispers that are anterior to learned speech. While the soon-to-be expanding number of victims of Jihadist terror will writhe agonizingly from the burns and the nails and the screws, neither the “civilized” world publics who bear silent witness, nor the “martyrs” themselves, will ever experience what is actually being suffered.

Physical pain, it must be realized, even in the “new Middle East,” can have no consequential “voice.” When, at last, it may discover some potentially decipherable sound, the listener will no longer want to listen. This audience, mortal and fragile, will wish most strenuously to deny its own existential vulnerabilities. Such denial, as Freud himself had recognized, lies at the very core of what it means to be human.

Violent upheavals spreading across the Middle East will always contain important hidden meanings. Their principal legacy will have little to do with any sustained popular revolution, democracy, or the overthrow of earthly despotisms. Instead, it will bear upon long-latent and much more primal human hopes of achieving the indisputably greatest power of all, power over death.

Drawing upon these important hidden meanings of current revolutionary fervor in the “new” Middle East and North Africa, the essence of any capable counter-terrorist policy must soon begin to lie in the following critical awareness: Jihadist violence is never actually rooted in any ostensible political or revolutionary ideology, but rather in remorselessly vengeful images of religious obligation. In the end, unmistakably, Jihadist terror is always an irresistibly sacred form of religious sacrifice.

Once this starkly elusive concept can be understood, we will finally be able to deal intelligently and purposefully with emerging expressions of “democracy,” “revolution,” and “martyrdom” in the region.”

There ought be nothing else required to demonstrate/underline/underpin, why the PA/Fatah/Hamas terror junta (though warring, the PA and Hamas are ostensibly part of one people, even though there hasn’t been a separate state of Palestine, but never mind) should NEVER be welcome among civilized nations. However, as the leader of the free world props up Islamists – here, there and everywhere – apparently, pointing out the obvious is no longer a given. 

Evil has been redefined.