EVER since the hard-fought struggle for civil rights was won in the 1960’s, the racist-imbued DemonRat Party plotted to ensure that racial grievances NEVER, EVER, again, leaves the public sphere. Domain.
IN fact, as the decades passed by, the stoking ratcheted up to what is taking place today — a horror of all horrors. Of course, the tortuous, two-term menace of BHO, the Racialist-in-Chief, brought everything to a head. By design.
ALAS, as is said, the proof is in the (racist) pudding. How else can one explain the leftists’ tarring, smearing, feathering, invectives, and racial epitaphs hurled in Justice Clarence Thomas’s direction; a poor, Black man who grew up during segregation, only to rise to the highest level through smarts, tenacity, and the content of his character, regardless of all of the lies that he benefitted from affirmative action!! Hogwash.
NOT only that, as always, Tucker hits the bulls-eye. Listen up.
BY the way, this writer’s sons were raised on the basis that merit is where it is at, and that there are no free rides. In tandem, being honest how you get there is the most significant lesson of all. Yes, they reached the tippy-top, having learned their lessons well.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
CONSERVATIVEFIRINGLINE | By Faye Higbee | June 29, 2023
Favoring one person over another based on color of their skin is unconstitutional
Well, this ruling set off a firestorm. The Supreme Court voted 6-2 to unplug “affirmative action” in colleges – they can’t use race preference in their admissions process. The vote was all Conservative justices versus the 2 liberals. Justice Ketanji Brown recused herself based on her connection to Harvard. The case involved the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, which states that no state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Colleges have adopted rules to make only certain persons eligible to be admitted based on their race. Today the change may turn back to merit-based admissions…IF the left doesn’t totally ignore the ruling.
The case involved a challenge to UNC under the 14th Amendment, and Harvard under Title VI.
The ruling stated in part:
The Constitution deals with substance, not shadows, and the prohibition against racial discrimination is levelled at the thing, not the name. A benefit to a student who overcame racial discrimination, for example, must be tied to that student’s courage and determination. Or a benefit to a student whose heritage or culture motivated him or her to assume a leadership role or attain a particular goal must be tied to that student’s unique ability to contribute to the university. In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual – not on the basis of race.
Many universities have for far too long done just the opposite. And in doing so, they have concluded, wrongly, that the touchstone of an individual’s identity is not challenges bested, skills built, or lessons learned but the color of their skin. Our constitutional history does not tolerate that choice. Justice Roberts writing for the majority (The cases are Students for Fair Admissions v. Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina, Nos. 20-1199 and 21-707 in the Supreme Court of the United States.) Breitbart
Justice Thomas wrote a concurring secondary opinion. But some on the left are furious. Here is just a sample of the melt-downs:
{ADDENDUM: Bear uppermost in mind — To stifle the truth-telling found at this site, FB’s censors have “zeroed-out” all of my articles via their “Boom and Ban” censors ala their ubiquitous “Community Standards” — as they hunt me up and down the internet like rabid dogs to their prey! No kidding. This is just some of FB’s modus operandi, what is now deemed their “love notes” to yours truly:This URL goes against our Community Standards on spam:adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.comACTIVITY
About your post Today at 4:34 PM: No one else can see your post.And so on and so forth. In fact, just recently, each article at my “parent site”, ADINA KUTNICKI: A ZIONIST & CONSERVATIVE BLOG, had its FB registered shares go from the hundreds, with some up to the many thousands, to a big, fat ZERO. In other words, all my shares have gone down the rabbit hole. Just like that. Poof. Gone. As such, take it to the bank that each and every conservative voice which reaches a wide readership will, sooner than later, be CENSORED. MUTED.} MESSAGE FAILED:This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}
Adina Kutnicki 