Whistleblower Blows the Lid; Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee…Dangers Revealed in “BANNED” (Sept. 2016), Prescriptive Measures, Too.
BEFORE we head to the most explosive acts of treason committed by the largest social media site on the planet via Mark Zuckerberg (and equally evil hatchet people), let us take a moment to raise a MEGA salute to the bravest whistleblower, bar none, Sarah Wynn-Williams!
NOW that that’s established, at its bare bones, U.S. national security is hanging by the precipice, and, by extension, the fate of Western Civilization.
IN this regard, since time is of the essence, let’s not re-work the wheel, in a manner of speaking. Therefore, this site’s opening shot was analyzed below.
ALONGSIDE the above, let’s segue to two more nails-in-the-coffin.
AS per the bullet-proof evidentiary trails, the reader is well advised to listen to the entire Senate Judiciary testimony of the whistleblower, painful as it is. Again, a braveheart of extraordinary courage and moral fiber! Moreover, bear in mind: her riveting testimony, when coupled with her distinct body language, suggests that something far worse than judicial punishment (and her financial ruin) could transpire, by daring to lay it all on the line re Facebook’s/Meta’s high stakes treason.
WHILE unsolicited, this investigative journalist feels duty bound to offer an additional piece of heartfelt (and practical) advice: place a barf-bag, plus other calming materials nearby – gonna need it!
EVEN more so, upon listently intently to the entire testimony, the below excerpt from Gateway becomes abundantly clear:
“Meta’s AI model, LLaMA, has contributed significantly to Chinese advances in AI technologies like DeepSeek. Facebook’s secret mission to get into China was called Project Aldrin and was restricted to need-to-know staff. There was no bridge too far. Meta built a physical pipeline connecting the United States and China.
Meta executives ignored warnings that this would provide backdoor access to the Chinese Communist Party, allowing them to intercept the personal data and private messages of American citizens. The only reason China does not currently have access to U.S. user data through this pipeline is because Congress stepped in. Meta started briefing the Chinese Communist Party as early as 2015. These briefings focused on critical emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence—
The explicit goal being to help China outcompete American companies. There’s a straight line you can draw from these briefings to the recent revelations that China is developing AI models for military use, relying on Meta’s LLaMA model.
Meta’s internal documents describe their sales pitch for why China should allow them into the market by, quote, “helping China increase global influence and promote the China Dream.”
MOVING right along (as stated within the subtitle of this post), not an iota of the treason committed by Zuckerberg and his malevolent crew should have been unexpected; that is, as if a bolt of lightning came careening downward from the sky. Far from it.
HOW so? “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” is rife with warnings about Facebook’s (yes, published in 2016, prior to its newly incarnated name change, Meta) lethality throughout its pages, and in countless ways.
BUT for this discussion, the following warrants posting due to its prescience – nine years prior to the Senate Judiciary testimony! Accordingly, two front and center dangers (among others) deserved to be highlighted in 2016: stealth-like censorship, as well as the absolute primacy of vitiating Section 230 to be detailed, too.
FOR instance,
THROUGHOUT BANNED, sans a shadow of a doubt, Zuckerberg’s minions deployed every stealth-like tool to ensure that censorship became the prevailing/expected mode of operation. As excerpted, said underpinnings, full-stop, were demonstrated/exhibited/pin-pointed within its four-page CONCLUSION:
“To paraphrase Apollo 13 astronaut Jim Lovell: Menlo Park, we have a problem.What started as a way to collect information on college students has grown and morphed into a global behemoth that now controls what news is read and threatens to control every aspect of its users’ Internet experience.
For those who are somewhat right of censor, Facebook has become what Breitbart.com called the “world’s most dangerous censor,”(1) silencing those who hold opinions that run contrary to the site’s monitors…..
AS per Section 230, where, oh where, to begin?!?
AKIN to jumping into a pool of flesh-eating sharks, let’s dive in, commencing with an excerpted backgrounder:
“With over 1.6 billion users worldwide, Facebook is clearly the largest social media site on the planet. For all practical purposes, Facebook has become the defacto Internet since nearly every site connects to it in one form or another. With that size comes great power – the power to lift up and the power to destroy. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been caught on an open microphone promising to stifle negative stories of “migrants” and he recently promised the world’s Muslims to make his site an open and welcoming place for them.
But as we will illustrate, the company has already been doing that. In the process, it has falsely accused many users, banning them from certain features on the flimsiest of contrived “evidence,” and has torn down pages over patently false claims and claims that are questionable at best. Many of these actions have caused financial losses, but it seems America’s legal profession has been cowed into acquiescence by the company’s sheer size.
We frequently hear politicians speak of companies not being too big to fail. But is Facebook too big to be regulated? Is Facebook so big that it can freely operate as a government unto itself? Indeed.
………..
On the other hand, there exists a paltry number of litigation specialists (specifically, within public interest firms) who are willing to take on the mantle for the betterment of all, as they battle against monster-sized entities. One such exception is Larry Klayman. According to Wikipedia,”Klayman is a politically conservative American public interest lawyer and former Justice Department attorney who has been called a ‘Clinton nemesis’ for his dozens of lawsuits against the Bill Clinton administration in the 90’s.
……….
Back in 2011, Klayman filed a lawsuit against Facebook and Zuckerberg in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia Civil Court for one billion dollars. (3) As is par for the course, a final decision was handed down in June 2014 in favor of Facebook: United State Court of Appeals For The District of Columbia argued February 25, 2014 and decided June 13, 2014. It held, in part:
The district court held that the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. Section 230, shielded Zuckerberg and Facebook from suit. We affirm. In enacting the Communications Decency Act, Congress found the Internet and related computer services “offer a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity.
……..
And this is precisely why Congress must revisit the aforementioned two-decades old Act. As a matter of record, it was conceived eight years before Facebook exploded onto the scene in February 2004.
……..
What this means is patently and painfully obvious: conclusively, what was appropriate in 1996 can no longer stand as is, and on its own merits. It is that simple and that clear.
The core questions become: Is Facebook really “offering a forum for true diversity of political discourse….” in as much as we have proven that its nebulous community standards are, in fact, double standards? Moreover, does Facebook live up to the absolute intent of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. Section 230 by opening up opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activities? Intrinsically, is militant jihad now considered within the bounds of cultural and intellectual activities? Is it the considered opinion of the court(s) that lending a “home” to militant jihadists who plot the slaughter of infidels the world over, with Jews, Christians, and other minorities as their targets, meets the rigorous standards of the aforementioned Congressional Act, let alone passes the smell test?
…….
And so on and so forth.
Know this: The deadly treason committed by Zuckerberg & gang will, sooner than later, constitute additional bombshells. As is said: Stay Tuned!
{ADDENDUM: Bear uppermost in mind — To stifle the truth-telling found at this site, FB’s censors have “zeroed-out” all of my articles via their “Boom and Ban” censors ala their ubiquitous “Community Standards” — as they hunt me up and down the internet like rabid dogs to their prey! No kidding. This is just some of FB’s modus operandi, what is now deemed their “love notes” to yours truly:This URL goes against our Community Standards on spam: adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.comACTIVITY
About your post Today at 4:34 PM: No one else can see your post.And so on and so forth. In fact, just recently, each article at my “parent site”, ADINA KUTNICKI: A ZIONIST & CONSERVATIVE BLOG, had its FB registered shares go from the hundreds, with some up to the many thousands, to a big, fat ZERO. In other words, all my shares have gone down the rabbit hole. Just like that. Poof. Gone. As such, take it to the bank that each and every conservative voice which reaches a wide readership will, sooner than later, be CENSORED. MUTED.} MESSAGE FAILED: This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems. If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}
Adina Kutnicki 