Several book citations of my work can be found, one of which is in “Defeat, Trauma, Lesson: Israel Between Life and Extinction” (pg 236), by Raphael Israeli (Professor at Hebrew University) – id=XZPPBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA236&lpg=PA236&dq=adina+kutnicki&source=bl&ots=J7LAkinrqs&sig=ROPrytAxN1R8z1NcJvtjp5b8bBc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_xODVIrOKIPrOLz8gegF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=adina%20kutnicki&f=false

Another book citation of my work can be found here, too: “Brand Islam: The Marketing and Commodification of Piety”, Faegheh Shirazi . 

World Net Daily, ‘Experts: Criticism Of Islam May Be Banned In U.S.’, dated 11/7/2016:

Adina Kutnicki, an Israel-based intelligence analyst and author of “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad,” noted that particular Lynch speech was given at a conference sponsored by the Muslim Advocates, a Muslim Brotherhood front group.

Kutnicki told WND Dave Gaubatz, a premier counterterror investigator, infiltrated a May 2014 conference of the Islamic Society of North America and overheard a Muslim Advocates representative assure the audience that Facebook is essentially in their pockets. In other words, Muslim Advocates and other front groups are working closely with social media sites to shut down accounts of users critical of Islam.

All of this leads Kutnicki to conclude things are taking a turn for the worse in America.

“Conclusively, free speech is no longer a constitutionally protected right,” she told WND. “Concomitantly, it is only a matter of (a short) time before trials begin, and not only against politicians. The above is manifestly clear: all Americans are in the crosshairs of the nation’s totalitarian speech-minders.”

And like Geller, Kutnicki believes the situation could get worse if Hillary Clinton assumes the presidency.

“No doubt, if Hillary Clinton is elected, or if Democrats retake control of the Senate, Americans will no longer be able to utter public criticism against Islam, migrants or related protected groups,” Kutnicki said. “In actuality, Clinton’s reputation precedes her, relative to her absolute nexus to Islamic dictates. Her closer than close relationship to Huma Abedin – a bona fide member of WAMY (World Association of Muslim Youth) and related Islamic terror groups – is a de facto warning sign that Islam will be protected at all costs.

“Not only that, reportedly, a British Party called her ‘Islam’s whore.’ Ipso facto, since any criticism of Islam is one of the harshest offenses under the sharia laws of blasphemy, well, anything remotely construed as ‘hate speech’ will be deemed punishable by law.”

The New York Times reported the Wilders case is about “a conflict between freedom of speech and the freedom from discrimination.” Freedom from discrimination may be a principle in the Netherlands, but Haney hopes it will never become entrenched in America.

“Freedom from discrimination,” Haney pondered. “Who defines that? How do you define ‘freedom from discrimination?’ Who is the victim and who is the guilty one? Who defines that? Is speaking the truth discrimination? Is it going to become a crime for simply pointing out that the country’s experiencing a lot of internal turmoil because of the influx of immigrants?”

Kutnicki, for her part, said freedom of speech must always trump the “freedom from discrimination” in a free society.

“Firstly, without freedom of speech, the cornerstone of a free society, ‘freedom from discrimination’ ceases to exist,” she reasoned. “Intrinsically, what is considered verbally ‘discriminatory’ is wildly subjective and the quintessential slippery slope. So aside from actual exhortations inciting to murder, which is against the law in any free and civilized society, the rest of this should be deemed steps toward totalitarian silencing.”

Geller, author of “Stop the Islamization of America,” said she believes freedom from discrimination is already morphing into a fundamental American right, but is actually a euphemism for “freedom from opposing voices.”

She commended Wilders for boycotting his own trial out of a conviction that it violated the principle of freedom of expression. Geller said Wilders’ attendance would lend the trial legitimacy it doesn’t deserve.

Geller agreed with Wilders’ comment that “the Netherlands is no longer a free country but a dictatorship.”

“In a free country, dissenting opinions are not subject to prosecution,” Geller said.

Kutnicki agreed Wilders should not attend his trial.

“Since it is akin to a ‘witch hunt,’ as opposed to a [judicial] trial, it would lend legitimate legal cover,” she said. “Effectively, this ‘show trial’ is showcasing what will happen if one dares to criticize Islam, even if one is a powerful politician. A chilling effect, in all its manifestations. Resultant, the Netherlands, (like other western nations) is a teetering fraction away from being a dictatorship.”

http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/experts-criticism-of-islam-may-be-banned-in-u-s/#GOefusttVyxUBXcJ.99

Breitbart.com, ‘ISIS Developing ‘Colonies’ In Middle East As It Gains Credibility Among Jihadists’, dated 11/25, 2014:

“Jerusalem-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki told Breitbart in an interview that ISIS’ expansion into Libya is definitely an offensive move.

“Wherever the Caliphate (ISIS) claims as its address and hoists its banner, rest assured, offensive jihad gains exponential traction,” Kutnicki said……

Adina Kutnicki says ISIS has further plans for expansion. She also told Breitbart that she believes ISIS’ will move on Saudi Arabia.

“I believe they will first target Saudi Arabia, for capturing the Kingdom brings them one step closer to controlling Sunni Islam. After which, the rest will be much easier to control, but in this order: Jordan, Lebanon and Israel. Rest assured, once they close in on Israel, Jerusalem’s nukes will be brought out, albeit the low yield ones,” Kutnicki said…..

However, Kutnicki believes ISIS has the power to move forward. She adds that in the push to enlarge its influence and territory, no city will be spared and the Islamic State will ignore Western leaders.

“Baghdad will not be spared, it is an integral part of their Caliphate plans. As to the west, they have no fear of the leadership of the free world and will not take any of the leaders into consideration,” Kutnicki said.

Kutnicki also says she takes seriously the recent reports that ISIS’ army numbers 200,000….

“I believe it is entirely possible that the 200,000 number is a close estimate, though proving it would be nearly impossible. Nevertheless, it is a viable guesstimate,” Kutnicki said. – http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/11/25/Analysts-ISIS-Developing-Colonies-in-Middle-East-as-it-Gains-Credibility-Among-Jihadists

World Net Daily, ’43 Islamists On Trial For Euro-Terror Plot’, dated 10/02/2014:

“Israel-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki said the concern over ISIS is well founded. However, Kutnicki told WND in an interview that the jihadists’ point of origin should not be the focus.

“Firstly, whether they are recruited in Belgium, or any other Western nation, is not the issue. The fact that Islamic jihad has come full circle – spreading its wings from the Mideast, back into Europe, only to re-enter the Mideast – is in order to fulfill the main mandate. That’s the reestablishment of the caliphate,” Kutnicki said.

Former Air Force counter-intelligence officer and terrorism analyst Dave Gaubatz said any effort to downplay the ISIS threat to the U.S. is seriously misguided.

“ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups, motivated by their Islamic ideology, are the world’s most dangerous threat. ISIS has money, followers, a military and a strategy for world conquest,” Gaubatz said.

Lopez emphasized ISIS fighters returning to Europe and the U.S. have two distinct advantages.

“Not only are these the most devout and practicing of all Muslims, but when they return from those battlefields they now have hardened battle skills that they learned and trained in over there. Further, they possess passports from European countries from which they may or may not need a visa to enter the U.S.,” Lopez said.

The ISIS motivation

Gaubatz said ISIS and like-minded groups are driven by one ingredient – hatred for Christians and Jews.

“Islamic-based organizations, terrorist groups and their supporters hate the Jews, Israel and Americans. When we hear them say they want to wipe out Israel, they’re serious. The U.S. has to take their threats seriously,” Gaubatz said.

Kutnicki agreed that ISIS and other jihadist groups are targeting the U.S.

“The U.S. is in grave danger because the Brotherhood Mafia (Muslim Brotherhood) is embedded in all of the relevant power centers. This goal of domination is why there are jihadi cells preparing for battle in multiple training camps. Jamaat Al-Fuqra is in the forefront on the Sunni side, and Hezbollah camps on the Shia,” Kutnicki said.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/10/terror-trial-exposes-backlash-to-multiculturalism/#rC2j87S2ok5lSCd6.99

World Net Daily, ‘Presbyterian Church USA Named In IRS Complaint’, dated 11/4/2014:

” Israel-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki said the PCUSA’s actions have made news in some conservative Israeli outlets.

“Israel National News, Arutz Sheva and a few other pro-Israeli sites have taken note of the action. However, it has largely been kept out of the mainstream media in Israel,” Kutnicki said. “Yes, the left, as in America, controls the mainstream channels.”

Darshan-Leitner also said none of the organizations that support the wider BDS movement support Israel’s right to exist.

“They don’t even believe in the right of Israel to exist along with a Palestinian state. They only believe in a one-state solution, and that’s a Palestinian state. This is entirely an effort to delegitimize Israel and finally reach their goal of the dissolution of the state of Israel,” she said.

She believes that in the end, the IRS will see the wisdom of the complaint and revoke the church’s tax-exempt status.

Kutnicki also believes the complaint has a solid legal basis.

“As to Shurat’s charge, well, it is absolutely the case that under non-profit rules, whether it’s a 501(c)3 or a 501(c)4 or other variant, it is absolutely forbidden to inject political directives into said organization,” Kutnicki said.

Kutnicki said Darshan-Leitner and her organization are “rock stars in the pro-Israel public.”

Kutnicki said that in a lengthy list of “knockout punches” is a recent win in a New York court against the Palestinian Authority on behalf of 11 families who were victims of terrorism.

She said that through the BDS movement, the Muslim Brotherhood and its front groups “are locking arms with Islamists.”

Kutnicki said there are many who are trying to smear Shurat HaDin’s reputation by describing it as an arm of the Israeli government.

She insisted it is “nothing of the kind.”

“In fact, the ruling left, and the left does execute policy in Israel, regardless of who sits at the helm, attempts to block and smear Shurat at every turn,” Kutnicki said.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/12/presbyterian-church-usa-named-in-irs-complaint/#CxKCFfJI4Mh3fjbm.99

AND BY DANA DiFILIPPO, Is this kosher? Daily News Staff Writer: 

But this backlash was especially intense: Some who claim CAIR is a terrorist-friendly group see Bender’s employment there as a treasonous public-relations ploy.

It is obligatory to out the traitors in our midst,” conservative Zionist blogger Adina Kutnicki wrote of Bender. “This . . . is a matter of Jews aiding and abetting those who seek nothing less than Israel’s destruction, and by definition, the murder of half of world Jewry.”