STIPULATED, whenever one envisions the term “military coup”, images of jack-booted soldiers conjure up. Yes, historically, it has been the case that strong-arm tactics were used in unstable and dictatorial regimes, and with little benefit accrued to the citizens. Effectively, it was akin to changing one poison for another.
AND contrary to popular misconception, the west had its share of attempted takeovers. Still, most recently, what comes to mind is the successful coup in Egypt: On July 3, 2013 Abdel Fattah el-Sisi overthrew president Mohamed Morsi. In reality, as backward and unstable as Egypt has been, and still is, it was more than nation-saving to stand behind this outcome.
IN precise terms, Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil el-Sisi…..عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي…..was Chief of the Egyptian Armed Forces from 2012-2014, having served in the armed forces since 1977. But none of this would be of interest to western patriots – other than as a historical footnote – if not for the fact that said military coup has knock-on effects for the most fiery region in the world, arguably, beyond its borders. Mind you, time will tell if said objectives were met, but its basis was (and still is) sound nonetheless.
MORE specifically, previous commentaries re el-Sisi should serve as basic backgrounders, but the following is instructive; a possible template for this commentary’s thesis, even if not an exact parallel due to HUSSEIN Obama’s military “purging”:
IT goes without saying, at least it should, if an Egyptian leader within the cradle of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia (founded in Ismailia, Egypt by Hassan al-Banna in March 1928 as an Islamist religious, political, and social movement) can declare all out war on its terror leadership and foot soldiers, one should assume that the leader of the free world would do the same. Not so fast. And, as readers will soon recognize, this is not an inconsequential factor to America’s crisis at hand.
SANS a scintilla of a doubt, while Obama Inc. supports the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt is killing them off. el-Sisi has proven to be more righteous than most American and Western politicians.
MORE specifically, due to all the out-sized dangers demonstrated above, the following commentary bears resonance:
PIGGYBACKING the above, individual states – via states’ rights enumerated in the Tenth Amendment – must assert their Constitutional authority to confront HUSSEIN Obama, as well as the inept Congress. So, if additional templates to free the American people from the yoke of an increasingly out of control Executive Branch require studying/mirroring, in relation to the impending Islamization of the nation and enumerable matters, why not follow S. Carolina’s GRASSROOTS model, even when the Governor is operating lock-step with a clearly anti-American POTUS?
A third South Carolina county has barred the door to any Third World refugees being resettled in their community, and at least two others are considering the same move.
The Berkeley County Council unanimously passed a resolution Monday that bars any refugee funds from flowing into that county.
The resolution calls for “all South Carolina public officials to immediately cease and desist” from helping to resettle Middle Eastern refugees anywhere in the state until the legislature can act on the issue and pass legislation reflecting the will of the people.”
Anderson and Pickens counties already passed similar resolutions.
Two more counties – Greenville and York – are expected to vote soon on similar resolutions.
South Carolina is the only state that gives local governments the option of rejecting, not necessarily the refugees, but the state and federal tax dollars that flow to their aid when they are resettled in a city.
The U.S. takes in 70,000 refugees per year for many years and President Obama has said he will up that to 85,000 in fiscal 2016 and 100,000 in 2017. These refugees are hand-selected by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres. The majority come from Muslim populations in Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Burma, Democratic Republic of Congo and Somalia although others include Hindus from Bhutan and a small number of Christians and Buddhists.
Obama’s Syrian refugees have proven most controversial, because of the presence of a large jihadist army in that country affiliated with the Islamic State, al-Nusra Front and al-Qaida. He has agreed to accept at least 10,000 Syrians for permanent resettlement in more than 180 U.S. cities and towns in fiscal 2016, with the promise of many more in 2017.
The U.N. has already selected nearly 20,000 Syrians who are waiting in the pipeline bound for the U.S.
But unlike most states, South Carolina is pushing back. Not from the top, as its Republican governor is cooperating with the Obama administration, but from the grassroots…..
Gov. Nikki Haley, a Republican, has come down on the side of Obama’s State Department, saying she trusts the federal government’s ability to vet the Syrian refugees.
Haley’s comment came despite warnings to the contrary from the FBI.
The latest warning came just last month when FBI Director James Comey stated before a congressional hearing that the U.S. government has no ability to screen the Syrian refugees because the U.S. has no boots on the ground in Syria and the nation’s law enforcement system is in shambles.
“The challenge we’re all talking about is that, we can only query against that (data) which we have collected,” Comey told the House Homeland Security Committee on Oct. 21.
“If someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interest reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home but there would be nothing show up because we have no record on it,” Comey continued.
“You can only query what you have collected.”
An earlier warning was given by one of the FBI’s top counter-terrorism officials, Michael Steinbach, to Congress on Feb. 11.
Haley hasn’t listened to the FBI’s warnings.
Media coverage ‘appalling’
The Post and Courier of Charleston, for instance, attributed fears about vetting the Islamic refugees to local Republicans, not mentioning that Obama’s own FBI director has said it’s impossible to vet them.
The Daily Beast ran a story under the mocking headline, “South Carolina town has no Sryian refugees, tells them to GTGO anyway.”
Lauren Martel, an attorney from the Hilton Head Island area, said the media coverage has been appalling.
“They’re trying to marginalize what’s going on in Berkeley County and box it in as sort of a Republican issue,” she said. “Once South Carolinians know what’s really going on, they don’t like it, because there’s a lot of people you wouldn’t expect don’t think it’s a good idea. It’s not a liberal-conservative issue. It’s an American issue.”
Martel said Berkeley County, like Anderson and Pickens before them, were smart to act before any resettlement agency opens shop in their area and announces that refugees are on their way. At that point, it’s too late.
“You have to know your rights before they come over here. Once they come, possession is nine-tenths of the law, it’s too late,” she said. “It’s easier to fight for something you have – your liberty, your rights – than to get it back after it’s gone. We have to stop this thing before they get on the airplanes and over here.”
Not a partisan issue
In fast-growing York County, which borders Charlotte, North Carolina, the resolution will also be introduced, possibly at next week’s council meeting.
Paula Daly, a York County activist who moved to the area from Michigan 10 years ago, also sees refugee resettlement as a nonpartisan issue.
“It bothers me that the media, they try to make it a partisan issue, like right versus left, when that’s not what this is at all,” she said. “This is an American issue. I’m an American. The refugees that are coming here over the next few years, and 200,000 is the last number I read that Obama wants to bring in here, and our governor signed that contract for next year to bring in 165 refugees, we don’t know where they will come from but if they’re Muslim they support Shariah law, they’re not compatible with our Constitution, just the complete opposite, and they do not assimilate.”
York County is famous for being the home of Islamburg, a Muslim enclave devoted to shadowy Pakistani cleric Sheik Mubarak al-Gilani, who controls a Sunni sect called Jamaat al-Fuqra and its U.S. front group, Muslims of the Americas, WND has previously reported….continue reading…
CONSEQUENTIALLY, is it out of bounds, hysteria-induced, or even hyperbole to posit: Is a military coup the way forward to save America? More pointedly, if you replace – musical chair-like – Muhamed Morsi…محمد محمد مرسى عيسى العياط….with HUSSEIN Obama, would there be any discernible diff, other than one is the leader of America, while the other served as a front-man for the Brotherhood Mafia, who happened to be deposed by a former military commander?
MOST significantly, it has already been proven – six ways to Sunday – that HUSSEIN Obama is a bonafide Brotherhood “made man.” Thus, how righteous would it be, nation-saving, for America’s military leadership to at least man-up as much as the current leader of Egypt, a basket-case on a good day and worse on a bad one!
AS to the Islamist-in-Chief’s military “purging,” yes, this is surely a large hurdle to overcome. However, while top brass are his yes-men, it is also the case that many officers a few levels beneath the hierarchy (Think: Lieutenant Colonel and down), as well as the boots on the ground soldiers, are itching to remove him from power. Couple said restlessness with a growing segment of former military personnel – up and down the chain of command – who want little more than the chance to remove him as Commander-in-Chief, well, the numbers and support rise to the nth degree.
A retired three star Flag Officer recently stated he knows of certain unnamed individuals within the Armed Forces of having at least considered the possibility of an armed coup d’état aimed directly at of Barack Obama, as reported by the on-line news portal Government Executive on Nov. 4, 2013.
A former top general and current executive at the Family Research Council says members of the military have considered staging a coup d’état against president, but will not because of civilian control of the military.
NEVERTHELESS, even though it would be technically against the Constitution for the military to take over the reins – since its stated provision is for a civilian to be in charge – well, the fact is that desperate times call for desperate measures. And considering that HUSSEIN Obama has been shredding the Constitution to pieces from day one, what exactly would be illegal about such a nation-saving course?
ADDITIONALLY, suffice to state that this investigative journalist is in close contact with groupings of former enlisted and officer types, chiefly, within the Marines. Indeed, the chatter is constant, as to the imperative to take over the reins for a prescribed period of time – until the “dust” settles – and before it is too late. Apparently, the consensus is that even though there is “only” a little over a year to go until his reign (of terror) is over, it is more than enough time for him to execute stepped-up damage.
EVEN more so, if one prefers a clinical “diagnosis”, the following places the situation into stark perspective: ” HUSSEIN Obama’s Iran Deal: A Forensic Analysis Reveals Unhinged Rage, A Lethal Danger.”
MOREOVER, as an adjunct to the above, it is beyond any rational discourse to think that the Narcissist-in-Chief is going to go “quietly into the night” ala most POTUS’s in their “lame duck” end-term. But to further enlighten re the national calculus, this site recommends – as a mandatory read – with the utmost urgency “Beware The Attack Of The Wounded Duck! Why Obama’s Post-Political Phase Means It’s Not Safe To Go Back Into The Water!” A deadly serious analysis.
READERS, patriots alike, this site can’t think of a damn reason why the main thesis within shouldn’t be the way forward. And just because the assessment is that the military would, by necessity, have to start the process, it is patently obvious that patriots must lend their support as “second-string” players, so to speak. What say you?
CRANK it up – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0heL2Czeraw