IN a non-captured American landscape, all of HUSSEIN Obama’s “missing” docs would have been enough reason to disqualify him from seeking the highest office in the free world. Rationally speaking, the calculus should have been: Either he discloses all requisite documents for the Presidency, or Congress will block him from becoming POTUS. Besides, documentary proof is basic due diligence, one which is required of all citizens for self-identification, let alone for leadership positions. Gee whiz. Ipso facto, the general thinking prevails: If you have nothing to hide, then produce the docs. Alas, we all know that something is more than fishy with the story-telling surrounding the Liar-in-Chief.
INTRINSICALLY, as a matter of record – and from this site’s inception – HUSSEIN Obama’s “special” dispensation was explored, and it started here.
THAT being said, in light of the fact that all eyes are on HUSSEIN Obama’s “inexplicable” counter intuitive policies and reactions re ISIS’s march on America (including, the most pressing national security imperatives, significantly, his insistence on arming Iran’s genocidal mullahs), rational westerners can no longer afford to give him a wide berth, let alone, the benefit of the doubt.
NOW, as always, a highly mitigating and complicating factor is the notion that whoever sits in the White House “deserves” unquestionable respect. Well, not from this perch, nor according to real patriots, namely, those who really fought to save America! In other words, unlike sissy (and prissy) pants HUSSEIN Obama, (ret) Lt. Colonel Ralph Peters put it on the line, and then some. Righteously, he coined him a total “pussy”, and went on to state:
“This is a president who has done more harm to American police departments than he has done to Islamic State. This is a president who restrains our military. He uses it not to defeat ISIS, but for political cover. This is a president who doesn’t want to hurt our enemies. This is a president who cares more about thugs in Guantanamo, or thugs in Ferguson, Missouri, than he does about law-abiding American citizens and their right to live in safety and in peace.”
BLESSEDLY, no wishy-washy, finger-in-the-wind “explanation”, when discussing the gravest national security threat(s) facing America and the west at large.
IN this regard, tragically, it is no longer shocking to find out that a Wahhabi-infused Muslim gave illegal orders to intelligence officials: “Downplay” ALL connections between San Bernardino’s jihadi shootings and terrorism! Say whaaat??
ATOP said treasonous dictates, what else should one conclude from the following treachery, that which could have prevented the aforementioned ISIS terror from the onset, plus future acts of militant jihad?
A former Department of Homeland Security agent says that an investigation he was conducting into a fundamentalist Islamic group operating in the U.S. may have helped stop San Bernardino jihadi Syed Farook had the government not shut down his probe.
During an interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly on Thursday, Philip Haney said that in 2012 as an agent with U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s National Targeting Center, he opened an investigation into a Sunni Islamic group called, Tablighi Jamaat, a subset of the fundamentalist Deobandi movement.
But Haney said that just a year into the investigation it was shut down State Department and the Homeland Security Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
The reason the investigation was quashed? Because the federal government did not want to profile Islamic groups, Haney told Kelly….continue reading….
NOW, as disturbing as this is, none of it should come as a surprise to this site’s readership. How many times has it been proven that the FEDS (via State and DHS at its spear) have become Islam’s protective sword and shield?
NOT only that, but isn’t it curious (and infuriating to boot, especially for those of us who understand full well what HUSSEIN Obama is “signaling” via this and that verbiage…poking fingers-in-the-eyes…alike, giving the proverbial F U salute in the process) that the Islamist-in-Chief insists on calling ISIS via its “other” name, ISIL, even though the general public uses ISIS? What’s going on?
Many who closely follow the dueling Islamic terror narratives emanating from the White House are mystified by Mr. Obama’s inability (or deliberate unwillingness) to utter the phrase “Islamic terrorists.” Many are curious, too, about why he refuses to call ISIS “ISIS,” steadfastly insisting instead that everybody in his administration call the terror group “ISIL.” What’s the difference, and why is it important? The agendas behind each diverge widely. In fact, the variance between the two is elephantine in scale.
ISIS stands for the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,” a terror group controlling a large swath of both Iraq and Syria in which the terrorists claim to have established a “caliphate,” a state in which Islamic sharia law is imposed upon all living in the area, anyone who fails to adhere to strict Muslim guidelines has his head removed. Obama’s contrary assertions aside, ISIS is by no means contained. In fact, the savage group (which prefers to be called the “Islamic State” or “IS”) has metastasized on maps like immense pools of blood covering the ancient borders that once divided parts of Syria and Iraq.
ISIL, Obama’s preference, stands for the “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.” According to glaphyridae.com, “[t]he Levant in its geographical sense comprises the following political entities: the west part of Syria, Lebanon, west part of Jordan, Palestine (West Bank and Gaza Strip), Israel and Sinai (Egypt).” Other sources claim that it also encompasses parts of Turkey. All of these states embrace Islam, with one very notable exception: Israel, our only “blood brother” ally in the region that all Islamic terrorists want gone, violently and forever.
That Obama uses ISIL in discussing the terrorists is extremely telling and chilling. To those of us who keep our fingers on the pulse of Middle Eastern geopolitics, the distinctions separating ISIS and ISIL are by no means meager. It’s readily apparent that Obama considers both Israel and its prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, thorns in each of his sides. Since 2009, his atrociously dismissive treatment of Netanyahu has been highly embarrassing, shocking, and outrageous, especially to those of us who cherish our relationship with the Jewish state.
Israel has proven itself a tried and true friend since its return to its ancient homeland in 1948. Despite some disagreements between the U.S. and the Jewish state, no previous president has shown such a hideous and blatant disregard for Israel’s head of state as has Obama. Nor has any previous president ever considered (to our knowledge) or suggested in a way bordering on insistence that Israel relinquish the land it now controls by contracting to its pre-1967 borders. Obama wants just that. Why? For Israel, a return to those boundaries would be suicidal, shrinking the country to a width of a very svelte nine miles and making it essentially indefensible.
Besides Israel, Jordan and the Kurds in Northern Iraq have been stalwart friends and allies. Jordan is one of the 65 countries Obama claims are actively “engaged” in taking ISIS/ISIL out. In reality, roughly 60 nations in that vaporous coalition are contributing little or nothing to the cause but allowing their country’s names to appear on a meaningless list…..continue reading….
EVEN so, shouldn’t HUSSEIN Obama, a self-professed “Christian”, have a hard time staying silent in the face of all the jihadi slaughter committed under the banner of Islam, and with ISIS in the forefront? And what about ISIS’s hacking into a Church’s website, thus, posting beheading videos and threats to Christians at large? Doesn’t this warrant the leader of the free world to man up, at the very least, or even to feign outrage??
THE key and core takeaway is that committed Muslims are incapable of placing the safety of America first, as its Christian (and Jewish) roots are reviled and despised by Islam. In fact, to do so is to go DIRECTLY against the Koran! It is all written in black and white.
TO wit, firstly, it is incontrovertible that HUSSEIN Obama is “document-challenged.” In tandem, his inherent belief system is diametrically in conflict with the protection of America, Dar al-Harb. A + B.
BUT above all else, if proof after proof – plus so much more – does not qualify HUSSEIN Obama as a bonafide Muslim, well, little else will. Oh, btw, even Rev. Wright from Trinity Church – supposedly, HUSSEIN Obama’s house of worship -admitted that he is unsure if he ever renounced his Islamic faith, all the while Wright gave him more than enough cover to hide under.
INDEED, if America is to survive, as attested to by high-ranking (retired) Generals, the only option left is for the military to remove him from power.
INCONTESTABLY, as stated at this site on numerous occasions: “Saving America: Is A Military Coup The Way forward? Analyses of Nation-Saving Measures.”