The advent of forensics (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_science), as a bonafide area of scientific study, has led to amazing results. While most are familiar with this discipline through an explosion of television shows, CSI & Forensic Files at the forefront, there is much more to this area of study than most are aware. In fact, knowing a thing or two about forensic accounting (adinakutnicki.com/about/) has led to many interesting developments and associations. Let’s leave it at that.
And while anything to do with delving into financial papers is enough to make ones eyes glaze over, the same cannot be said for forensic law enforcement. They utilize scientific tools to place all manner of criminals under the microscope, and hopefully behind bars. Said work is hardly devoid of high drama.
In this regard, its “sister” specialty, forensic profiling is less well known, yet more of an enigma. Well, this is because it is the purview of professionals who study the deep recesses of the mind, a cerebral mystery, under the best of circumstances. While the FBI is the largest receptacle of said mental probing, there exists a smattering of private endeavors who bring, otherwise elusive, suspects to heel. One such address is The Forensic Panel (forensicpanel.com), headed by Dr. Michael Welner, featured herein - www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/forensics/welner/index.html.
A forensic profiler whose previous cases have included the Natalie Holloway disappearance and the O.J. Simpson double murder says Barack Obama unconsciously made a stunning confession in his effort to blame the sequester idea he suggested on Republicans.
“Obama replied to (rare) press challenges about his contribution to the problem, ‘Give me an example of what I might do.’ Then he proceeded to unconsciously answer his own question with further denials, declaring, ‘I am not a dictator. I’m the president,’” Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., told WND in an assessment.
“For good measure he adds further unconscious proof in yet another vivid denial. I ‘can’t force Republicans to do the right thing’ – confessing again that in dictatorial fashion he was forcing the Republicans’ hands by not negotiating and failing to do the right thing.”
Hodges, who wrote “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” previously deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in the Boulder, Colo., murder case.
He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators.
He’s not new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.
“Once more Obama has brilliantly and unknowingly profiled himself regarding his deceptive behavior – this time surrounding the sequester conflict with Republicans,” Hodges explained. “The profile is based on the discovery of an unconscious super intelligence – a major step beyond Malcolm Gladwell’s description of the ‘new adaptive unconscious’ in his best-seller ‘Blink.’ He demonstrated how our deeper mind quick-reads various situations in the blink of an eye.”
Hodges said that at Obama’s March 1 press conference, the president’s super intelligence quick-reads his deep motives about sequester and then announces those motives to the public.
“‘Let’s be clear: None of this is necessary,’ Obama said. ‘It’s happening because of a choice that Republicans in Congress have made. We shouldn’t be making a series of dumb, arbitrary cuts to things.’ We have another blatant albeit unconscious projection and confession. He knows his choice – a non-negotiable demand for more taxes after just receiving a $150 billion ‘tax raise’ in January – was foolish,” Hodges explained. “He further revealed his arbitrary behavior when he refused the choice offered to him to spread out the miniscule 2 percent budget cutacross the board to lessen the impact. Like a dictator he wanted power over the Republicans in his ploy to cast them as the evil ones.”
He also addressed Obama’s reference to two sci-fi movies.
“He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a ‘Jedi mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’ used on weak-minded foes (‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games to trick subservient foolish Americans.
“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it if we know how – just as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’ would let others read his mind to provide them with special insightful messages,” he said.
He suggested Obama has been exaggerating the impact of sequester to “unconsciously paint a true picture of his overall destructive plan,” he said.
“His super intelligence looks into the future and sees the result of his plans long-term,” Hodges said.
Hodges also suggested Obama is revealing a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to be an apocalypse.”
“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he could do something else ‘to make these guys not paint horns on my head’ we indeed should be frightened beyond belief. He suggests America is in for a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he harbors evil intentions,” Hodges said.
As WND reported, Hodges previously concluded Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.
On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”
“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.
Much has been written, mostly by the alternative media, about Obama and his plans for America, as well as for the world. Never mind the ink spilled at these pages, including the time, energy and resources expended. But it was not an exercise in futility (at this blog), nor hyperbole, to essentially posit the question: Who is Obama, and what is he up to? Wish the question didn’t have to be asked.
And tied into his non-conventional lifestyle, a lifestyle which most Americans, at best, are uncomfortable with, lurks a man with an abiding hatred for America, and all that it represents – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/04/who-is-barack-hussein-obama-and-what-is-he-hiding-reggie-love-his-down-low-lifestyle-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Which leads us back to his red/green roots, and his basic “transforming” plans for the nation he is sworn to lead - adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/. His “green” bonafides are duly exhibited within - adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Most significantly, under his purview, the Demsters are fiddling with the Constitution - adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. To wit, at the helm of the left’s march towards totalitarian, dictatorial rule sits Barack HUSSEIN Obama – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/08/the-lefts-march-towards-totalitarian-rule-one-party-at-a-time-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. NO mystery at this end.
NOT to be lost in the discussion, any reasonable person, let alone one skilled in forensics, would find “The One’s” following statement, more than a little curious: “ In the prologue to the second of his autobiographies, “The Audacity of Hope,” Barack Obama said: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”
Due to the above preponderance of evidence, is it then far fetched to question: A leader of the free world, who views “serving as a bank screen” as a normative value system, really has more things to hide than his preference for “this or that”? Could it be, he came into power with designs so antithetical to American constructs (and against the majority public’s will, even though he managed to get elected) that only an exceptionally skilled forensic profiler can fully interpret the signs and signals?