AMONG too many Orwellian spheres endemic within the “world according to Islam and its barbaric followers”, the most galling is the uppity way in which Islamists proclaim that Muslim women are elevated upon a protective pedestal under the banner of Islam, unlike the way non-Muslim women are treated in the west as sexual objects and worse. In a pig’s eye.
ALONG this mendacious and twisted fairy tale, they opine that shielding a woman from harm is mandated within Islam’s religious and cultural “norms.” As if. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth, at least in terms of the real definition of what it means to violate children and women and how Shariah Law “interprets” said heinous actions.
BUT before we segue to the latest (have your barf bags handy….perhaps, a sedative or two), let’s just perform a brief Islamic colonoscopy:
COLONOSCOPY ONE:
ALONG this icky terrain, this investigative journalist gives a shout out to American patriots: Are you ready to “welcome” child brides into your communities, some of whom are as young as 9 years old? Yes, you read that right!
ALAS, this site has repeatedly reported on the disaster unfolding within Europe due to the Islamic hijrah swamping its shores. Now, aside from an explosion of rape-jihad, the likes of which can no longer even be called rampant – in so far that this descriptor is too benign – let there be NO doubt that all “migrants” to America ala the so-called “refugee” penetration (even though, for the time being, there are still stringent U.S. laws re marriageable age), well, those who were “married” within Islamic cesspools will be able to stay “married” to children! You got that?
COLONOSCOPY TWO:
MORE specifically, how about the fall-out to America from said newest arrivals, as they “price” sex with kiddies under the umbrella of another “religious” fatwa? Mind numbing.
IN any case, Allah’s Muslim Terrorists never cease finding ways to “kosherize” their unquenchable lust for kiddies (males alike, but let’s stick to the females), be they their own children, relatives, or strangers. It makes no diff.
Recently the authority issued a fatwa – an interpretation of Islamic rules – which created intense debate.
To a question from a believer, Diyanet replied that from an Islamic view it had no impact on a marriage “if a father kisses his daughter with lust.”
It was also, according to Diyanet, no sin “if the father looks at his daughter and feels lust.” The daughter must, however, “be over nine years old.”
This fatwa comes shortly after another fatwa from Diyanet, which said that engaged couples should not hold hands, because it could lead to other things, things that are haram (illegal) in Islam. In some countries it could even give grown men a reason to pick up stones and throw them at the couple until they are dead.
Put the two latest fatwas together and it gives a view of sexuality in Islam that is completely unreal and disgusting seen with Western eyes.
“Regrettable error in translations”
The fatwa naturally triggered a storm of outrage online, so much that the page where the fatwa had been was removed. But it is still in circulation, as people have saved it.
Now the head of Diyanet, Mehmet Görmez, tries to fix the scandal and run away from the original fatwa. To the Turkish broadcaster TRT, he says that the dramatic interpretation was due to a regrettable error in translation from Arabic!
The new answer to the question of father and daughter lust now reads, according Diyanet, that incest is a “pathological aberration”.
There is only one problem – which everybody (at least in Turkey) knows. The religious experts at Diyanet are perfectly fluent in Arabic. They never make banal translation errors like this, ever. But of course, they had to come up with some lame excuse and this was probably the least lame they could come up with during the urgent cleric brainstorming meeting.
Coldly itemized in 15 points, a newly discovered fatwa from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant outlines the particulars of when it believes a follower can rape a woman without violating Sharia law.
Released by Reuters on Tuesday, Fatwa No. 64 is dated Jan. 29, 2015 and details the extremist group’s rules for sexual slavery, a topic ISIL theologians say has “not been dealt with in ages.” The document was found by U.S. Special Operations Forces during a raid in Syria in May.
ISIL’s Committee of Research and Fatwa justifies the violence by suggesting that one of the “inevitable” consequences of jihad is that the women and children of infidels will become captives.
Earlier this year, Human Rights Watch interviewed 20 women and girls who escaped from ISIL and described a system of organized rape and sexual assault. The women reported girls as young as eight were traded among ISIL fighters or given as gifts. ISIL considers the women and girls, many from the Yazidi religious minority, as “spoils of war.”
Women are considered chattel in the fatwa and ISIL’s theologians decree that “if two or more individuals are involved in the purchase of a female captive, none of them are permitted to have intercourse with her because she is part of a joint partnership.”
The rules explain the parameters of ownership as they relate to sex. A man who owns two sisters cannot have intercourse with both women and the same rules apply to a mother and daughter.
Among the list of don’ts: anal sex and sex with a pregnant or menstruating woman. Should a captive become pregnant, abortion is off limits.
Tacked onto the end are a few references to showing compassion to a captive and avoiding selling her to someone who would mistreat her.
According to the New York Times, a total of 5,270 Yazidis were abducted last year, and at least 3,144 are still being held captive. ISIL has even established a full bureaucracy surrounding the sale of women and girls, and the sales contracts are reportedly notarized by ISIL-run courts.
OH, despite all the lying balderdash to the contrary, ISIS IS following Shariah Law to the letter. Therefore, anyone who opines otherwise is both a fool and a knave. Pick your poison.
MIND you, committed Muslims in America and throughout the west, for the most part, are in sync with whatever fatwa emerges from “respected” authorities in Shariah Law. Don’t believe otherwise. Therefore, if, heaven forfend, America’s underpinnings fall, there is no doubt that the so-called “refugees” will be joined by their well established co-religionists all over the nation. Indeed, they will implement all the above – and so much more – according to Shariah Law. This is why they are Allah-bent on imposing their will wherever they set foot. Again, they conquer and subjugate native populations, regardless of this and that.
FOLKS, it is really a very simple calculus: Either Americans (westerners) will choose to blind themselves to the realities embedded in Muslim communities – and prevalent all over the world – or they will resist. After all, Allah’s Muslim Terrorists are marching onward and upward, all the while breaching America’s non-existent gates. In tandem, they are “setting up shop” through open sesame channels via officialdom. Thus, is it any longer a viable and rational option to sit still and await for their takeover? You decide.
Adina Kutnicki 