IN order to internalize the grave danger America is in – relative to the injection of Shariah Law – one must first recognize why ANY semblance of Shariah Law implanted within America is a clear and present danger. Civil, criminal, Shariah financing laws…makes no diff.

SPECIFICALLY, the Muslim Brotherhood’s overall plan is to subsume all of America under the boot of Shariah, not “just” the Muslim community. They are deadly serious, and their track record attests as much. Don’t dare to dismiss their American (and global) designs.

AT its base, Shariah Law is a knock out blow (despite protestations to the contrary, ala Islamists and anti-American leftists) to the U.S. Constitution, the law of the land. 

Shari’a is an Arabic word meaning “path” or “way.” Today the term is used most commonly to mean “Islamic law,” the detailed system of religious law developed by Muslim scholars in the first three centuries of Islam and still in force among fundamentalists today.

Shari’a tries to describe in detail all possible human acts, dividing them into permitted (halal) and prohibited (haram). It subdivides them into various degrees of good or evil such as obligatory, recommended, neutral, objectionable or forbidden. This vast compendium of rules regulates all matters of devotional life, worship, ritual purity, marriage and inheritance, criminal offenses, commerce and personal conduct. It also regulates the governing of the Islamic state and its relations to non-Muslims within the state as well as to enemies outside the state. Shari’a influences the behavior and worldview of most Muslims, even in secular states where it forms no part of the law of the land.

Islam teaches that shari’a, as God’s revealed law, perfect and eternal, is binding on individuals, society and state in all its details. By logical extension, any criticism of shari’a is heresy. Muslims who deny the validity of shari’a in any way are labeled as non-Muslims (infidels) or apostates (those who convert to another religion) by traditionalists and Islamists. As such, they face the threat of being prosecuted for apostasy, a crime that carries the death penalty in shari’a.

The mandates of shari’a are extremely harsh compared to modern Western standards. They infringe on many modern principles of human rights, religious freedom, and equality of all before the law. For example:

Hudud punishments are the severe penalties prescribed by shari’a for offenses defined as being against God himself. The punishments for these crimes are seen as divinely ordained and cannot be changed by humans. These include 100 lashes or stoning to death as punishment for adultery; 80 lashes for false accusation of adultery; amputation of limbs for theft; 40 or 80 lashes for drinking alcohol; imprisonment, amputation or death (by crucifixion in serious cases) for highway robbery; and the death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Methods of execution for apostasy can include decapitation, crucifixion, burning, strangling, drowning, impaling, and flaying. Apostates are denied a decent burial after their deaths, and the Muslims who participate in killing them are promised an eternal reward in paradise.

Discrimination on the basis of religion is fundamental to shari’a. By religious edict, Islam must be dominant; only Muslims are considered to be full citizens. Jews and Christians are defined as dhimmis (literally “protected” i.e. permitted to live). However this protection is on condition that they do not bear arms, know their lowly place in society, treat Muslims with respect, and pay a special poll tax (jizya).

Shari‘a divides the world into two opposing domains: the House of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb). Muslims are supposed to wage jihad to change the House of War (where non-Muslims are dominant) into the House of Islam, dominated by Muslims. While some modern Muslims reject this aggressive understanding of jihad, and see it merely as a strengthening of personal faith, most agree that jihad includes defending Muslim territory and Muslims from any form of aggression; this leaves the door open to interpreting any conflict involving Muslims as a case of defensive jihad. Islamic terror groups justify their atrocities by references to the shari’a rules on jihad.

Shari’a discriminates on the basis of gender. Men are regarded as superior. Women are treated as deficient in intelligence, morals and religion, and must therefore be protected from their own weaknesses. Shari’a rules enforce modesty in dress and behavior and the segregation of the sexes. These regulations place women under the legal guardianship of their male relatives. Women are inherently of less value than men in many legal rulings. A man is allowed up to four wives, but women can have only one husband. A man can divorce his wife easily; a woman faces great obstacles should she want a divorce from her husband. A daughter inherits half as much as a son, and the testimony of a female witness in court is worth only half that of a male witness. In cases of murder, the compensation for a woman is less than that given for a man.

Shari’a courts often display a clear gender bias. This is seen in the widespread practice of accusing rape victims of illicit sexual relations (zina), an offense which carries punishments ranging from imprisonment and flogging to death by stoning….

BUT it is not as if “God is our objective, the Koran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations” hasn’t been made clear via “The Plan”, delineated below.

THUS, little is more important than understanding Shariah Law’s underlying basis, as well as how the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s tentacled arms wrap around the power centers inside America. Operate. Indeed, Americans (the west) must agree that when a POTUS states: he is not a “secret” Muslim, but that it wouldn’t be a bad thing if he were, well, that is about the closest to an admission re what’s what and who’s who.

Founded in 1928 by the Egyptian schoolteacher/activist Hasan al-Banna (a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis), the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) — a Sunni entity — is one of the oldest, largest and most influential Islamist organizations in the world.

While Egypt historically has been the center of the Brotherhood’s operations, the group today is active in more than 70 countries (some estimates range as high as 100+). Islam expert Robert Spencer has called MB “the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda.” In 2003, Richard Clarke – the chief counterterrorism advisor on the U.S. National Security Council during both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations – told a Senate committee that Hamas, al Qaeda, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad were all “descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers.”

MB was established in accordance with al-Banna’s proclamation that Islam should be “given hegemony over all matters of life.” Toward that end, the Brotherhood seeks to establish an Islamic caliphate, or kingdom — first spanning all of the present-day Muslim world, and eventually the entire globe. The organization further aspires to dismantle all non-Islamic governments wherever they currently exist, and to make Islamic Law (Shari’a) the sole basis of jurisprudence everywhere on earth. This purpose is encapsulated in the Brotherhood’s militant credo: “God is our objective, the Koran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death for the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations.”

Consistent with the foregoing credo, MB since its founding has supported the use of armed struggle, or jihad, against non-Muslim “infidels.” As al-Banna himself wrote: “Jihad is an obligation from Allah on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded.”Added al-Banna: “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.”

TRENCHANTLY, it is under their “proverbial wings” that Shariah Law has deeply embedded into the heart of America, and its poisonous fruits have given birth in Texas! Yes, the so-called “Lone Star” state, heretofore a bastion of conservatism. Go figure…

YET, before we get to the latest “news” re Texas (others following suit too, more on that in upcoming commentaries), this site warned about the steady encroachment/progress the Brotherhood was making. Not only that, it was “predicted” at these pages!

 Encroachment Warning One:

PLEASE recall (one of) this site’s initial commentary (July 2012), one which detailed “The Plan”. It was not for nothing. Imbibe its basis.

Encroachment Warning Two:

BUT fast forward to merely 16 months later, Nov. 2013, a blip on the yearly calendar. The following was duly noted:

A recent commentary, EXPOSED: A List Of Muslim Brotherhood Mafia Operatives Inside America, Their Linkage To Obama Inc., flew across the web like a house on fire. A six-alarm siren call, or higher.

The point being, many Americans (westerners in general) are waking up to their new reality; an Islamic imposed nightmare readying to encircle their way of life, if not thwarted in equally warp speed. As a result, much time, energy and qualified resources herein are busy uncovering the designs of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, the progenitor of the entire plot, Al Qaeda included. Yes, an actual plot….

Phase 1: Establishment of an elite Muslim leadership, while raising taqwa, or Islamic consciousness, in the Muslim community.

Phase 2: Creation of Islamic institutions the leadership can control, along with the formation of autonomous Muslim enclaves.

Phase 3: Infiltration and Islamization of America’s political, social, economic and educational systems, forming a shadow state within the state. Escalation of religious conversions to Islam.

Phase 4: Openly hostile public confrontation over US policies, including rioting, and militant demands for special rights and accommodations for Muslims.

Phase 5: Final conflict and overthrow (jihad).

MICHIGAN MUSLIMS PLOT ISLAMIC-LAW COURT….

CAIR discussing establishment of Shariah divorce system….

(refer below:Texas-style, Shariah Family courts have been implemented!)

Encroachment Warning Three:

BUT they won’t be satisfied until the overthrow of the Constitution (with help from the Islamist-in-Chief) is a fait accompli. Therefore, they formed their own political party! Yup, introducing, the US Council of Muslim Organizations:

OH dear, as always, the bearer of (more) bad news…the Islamic Tribunal inside Texas!

On Tuesday, Breitbart Texas said it confirmed the existence of an Islamic tribunal dispensing Sharia law in Texas. According to the report, the tribunal consists of four attorneys operating in Dallas. The tribunal, Breitbart added, issues voluntary rulings on civil disputes like divorces and family problems. While one might think the existence of such a tribunal would make national news, a Google search found that the so-called “mainstream media” has yet to issue a single report as of this writing.

Taher El-badawi, one of the so-called “judges” of the tribunal, told Breitbart the tribunal applies Shariah law only to litigants who voluntarily accept their rulings on disputes involving family and business issues. According to El-badawi, the organization is “a tribunal, not arbitration.” Meriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines tribunal as “a court or forum of justice.”

“While participation in the tribunal is voluntary, a married couple cannot be considered divorced by the Islamic community unless it is granted by the tribunal,” he said. And, he admitted, men and women are treated different under Sharia law. “The husband can request the divorce directly from the tribunal,” he explained. “The wife must go to an Imam who will request the divorce for her.” But when it comes to child support, visitation, and custody, the tribunal follows Texas family law, El-badawi said. Most of the time, he added, custody is awarded to the mother.

El-badawi said that most of the time, Texas law and Sharia law are in agreement. But when pressed, he admitted that in the event of a conflict, the tribunal follows Sharia law.

“If the parties are not satisfied with the tribunal’s decision, they do not have to accept it and they can take the matter to Texas civil courts,” he added. But, Bob Price wrote, El-badawi “did not say what the social ramifications of rejecting the ‘judge’s’ decision would be.”

“The courts of the United States of America are costly and consist of ineffective lawyers,” says the website for the tribunal. “Discontent with the legal system leads many Muslims in America to postpone justice in this world and opt for an audience on the Day of Judgment.”

“It is with this issue that Muslims here in America are obligated to find a way to solve conflicts and disputes according to the principles of Islamic Law and its legal heritage of fairness and justice in a manner that is reasonable and cost effective,” the site adds. It also says that “stoning adulterers, cutting of the hands, polyandry and the like (all can be traced in the relevant literature and can be explained in their Islamic legal mentality and rational context in fairness and justice), are mainly a part of Islamic Criminal Law. In fact criminal law within Islam only makes up a fraction of the Shari’ah. It is unscholarly and unfair to generalize that type of understanding, that is Criminal Law, to compromise the whole of Islamic law if we stick to speaking in technical terms.”

The idea of an Islamic tribunal in Texas is not new. In 2008, UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh wrote about a case in Texas where the courts upheld the results of arbitration by an Islamic tribunal. Moreover, he said at the time, it seems the courts apparently have no problem with Sharia law being dispensed in Minnesota and New Jersey.

SIGNIFICANTLY, the U.S. court system has been dangerously compromised by the Brotherhood’s various bludgeon’s, and by anti-American judges who preside at the benches. Thereby, they take little issue with Shariah Law invading their judicial territory. Isn’t it clear that the powers that be are so thoroughly corrupted, they no longer even feel the need for any pretense that the Constitution is the law of the land? Rhetorical.

SO from this week’s Shariah Law coming out of Texas, a mere 14 months went by for the Court plan to be implemented, as described within Encroachment Warning Two. Voila! Do you still think they are blowing (Islamic) smoke?

LIKE night follows day, it is not a “coincidence” that last week’s MEGA Islamist conference in Garland, Texas is incidental in both its location and timing. Not by a long shot. Added context can be found here.

READERS, as a matter of record, this investigative journalist was relayed a few tidbits (yes, these “birdies” must remain anonymous…they prefer their head(s) to remain atop their shoulders) re the Texas conference. In fact, “break off” groups were putting the finishing touches on what has been in the works for years; actual Shariah Law courts/tribunals which are binding, regardless that their decisions contravene the laws of the land! Indeed, Texas is their “test” case, and many more are in the works. You got that?

MEMO to Brotherhood Islamists who planned/attended Garland, Texas’s “Islamophobia” conference: you never know when patriots are just one, two or three steps ahead of you…behind you. Even though Islamic enforcers kept most bonafide media at bay, a few investigative types (thankfully) slipped through your nets!

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

{re-blogged at Free Republic}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}