Nevertheless, once the dots are connected one is able to see from there to here: as to why Obama Inc. not only lied to the American people, but waged an ILLEGAL war in Libya, even though disguised under the “legal” cover of R2P. Samantha Powers devised this “kosherized” scheme, “Responsibility to Protect”, to allow American radicals to upend foreign regimes, those they deemed “necessary” to assist their Muslim Brotherhood partners in crime. Pinkie swears.
Moreover, once their bloody footprints become visible, one can’t help but recognize Turkey’s DEEP nexus and the collaborative efforts between Barack HUSSEIN Obama & his favorite Mid East Islamist, PM Erdogan. Not only that, the least of their concerns are the slaughters of tens of thousands of Christians, just as long as their Sunni Brotherhood partners come out on top. Now, some may rightfully query: if the above is correct, then what took so long for Obama Inc. to VISIBLY arm the so-called Syrian rebels to the teeth? Well, Benghazigate didn’t go off as planned, that’s what happened!
But let’s not get all sappy and think that the Islamist-in-Chief is finally doing the right thing and assisting the “rebels”. For if arming Al Qaeda affiliated “rebels” is considered an American (western) interest, then it certainly is the correct path. To be sure, don’t get distracted by their jibber jabber…yes, they “vetted” who’s who among the “rebels”…it’s like picking between Al Capone and his rivals – on Islamic steroids!!
Let us dare not forget the part played by “elder statesman” John McCain, you know, the guy who milked his POW status for more than one lifetime, and headlined the defense of Hill’s gal pal, Huma Abedin, all the while her Muslim Brotherhood bonafides were exposed in plain view!
But never mind all that…the Brotherhood comes before their supposed Christian brothers and sisters slaughtered in Syria. Worldwide too. Jewish blood, cheaper to them than dirt… Pray tell, have we heard a peep out of any of them re the “slaughtering of innocents”, at least if it means dislodging from their Brotherhood-in-Arms?
And, has the public heard anything about this: Libyan ship Al Entisar docked in Turkey days prior to Benghazi attacks.
“We’ve got early warning radar systems in Turkey, we’ve got Patriot missile batteries, we’ve got massive airbases, we’ve got investments… the Turks have served as an important ally for us. If we lose that, I think it would be very detrimental to American foreign policy.”
There is of course, the issue of NATO. The U.S. is obligated to stand with Turkey per the NATO charter. AsShoebat.com published last month, this agreement should never come at the expense of looking the other way when it comes to genocide. In Syria, sides have been chosen. Christians have chosen the side of Bashar al-Assad, not because he’s a good guy but because the Jihadists are so much worse; Christians are being slaughtered by rebels and protected by Assad. It is indisputable that the U.S. has chosen to side against Christians there by having Turkey as its ally. Earlier this year, Shoebat.com reported on how Senator John McCain berated Syrian Christian leaders who were simply attempting to draw attention to their plight at the hands of the jihadists McCain has been supporting. Last August, several foreign policy experts signed a letter addressed to President Barack Obama urging him to take military action against the Assad regime in response to what they insisted was a chemical weapons attack launched at the regime’s hand. One of the signatories of the letter was Clifford May, the President of FDD, the organization Schanzer works for. Mark Dubowitz, listed as FDD’s Executive Director whose focus ironically includes human rights in Syria, was also a signatory to the letter. These ‘experts’ advocated such a position despite mounting evidence at the time that the attack was the result of the rebels, not the regime. These otherwise inexplicable positions are explained by one primary alliance – the one mandated by NATO and necessary strategically based on Schanzer’s analysis. The U.S. alliance with Turkey.
- Morell chose to side with CIA analysts in Virginia over his CIA personnel on the ground in Libya.
- Morell did not want to implicate the State Department, headed at the time by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and watered down the talking points to help do that.
- Morell did not want to “enflame” the “passions” of jihadists by identifying them accurately in the talking points.
It is also known that Ambassador Stevens met with the House Intelligence committee just days prior to the attack. In an interview with Fox News hostess Megyn Kelly last November, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), who chairs the committee, appeared to give an account of what transpired in a closed session with CIA personnel who witnessed the attacks, that conflicted with that Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who sits on the committee. One week prior to Morell’s testimony, Rogers announced plans to retire from Congress after his current term ends later this year. This unexpected announcement came just a few days after another report from Herridgerevealed a suspicious – and possibly illegal – timeline both for the departure of J. Michael Allen from his job as majority staff director for the House Intelligence Committee, as well as his destination – Beacon Global Strategies. At Beacon, Allen works with Morell and a host of other Hillary Clinton loyalists, to include an extremely close aid named Philippe Reines. It was reported by the Washington Free Beacon that a CIA official died in an apparent suicide in the same week that Morell testified before the House Intelligence Committee. There is currently no evidence of defenestration.