{Two major Brotherhood operatives within America’s power centers!}

Huma Abedin, in tandem with Hill (her joined-at-the-hip gal pal), was front and center at the onset of this site. It was not an accident.

ALAS, back in June 2012, an initial commentary revolved around Huma and Hill, and it was entitled “Six Degrees of Separation.” They were featured as “persons of concern.”

PLEASE recall the time frame, it was more than germane. Still is. Yes, it coincided with the terrifying likelihood that the Islamist-in-Chief would gain a second term, as well as Hill being able to continue her (mis)reign as Sec. of State. Mind you, this all came into play only 3 months before Benghazigate blew up, a hardly incidental point of reference. What? Well, it was at this most “opportune” time that Huma Abedin  “conveniently” flew out of line of fire at the State Dept, only to re-emerge and continue her work as a “special government employee.” Hmm. How fortuitous.

Ms. Abedin declined a request for an interview, but the picture that emerges from interviews and records suggests a situation where the lines were blurred between Ms. Abedin’s work in the high echelons of one of the government’s most sensitive executive departments and her role as a Clinton family insider…..

Ms. Abedin reached her new working arrangement in June 2012, when she returned from maternity leave, quietly leaving her position as deputy chief of staff and becoming a special government employee, which is essentially a consultant…..

NOT only that, but the evidence soon became overwhelming that the empowerment of the Muslim Brotherhood  – through a mega weapons smuggling operation – was a main focal point for blowing apart Libya. So, how likely was it that a major Muslim Brotherhood (Sisterhood) player was in the dark about this operation, but had no hand in its implementation, like Hill, whose hands steered State’s wheel at the behest of Barack HUSSEIN Obama? 

NOW that Huma’s tenure…now you see her, now you don’t…at State has become clearer, it is time to paint an additional Islamic picture, regarding her infiltration and penetration into America. Coin it, from henceforth, her “House of Saud undercover” operation!

STILL, for one to understand the most revealing aspects to her infiltration and penetration, one must fully recognize exactly how Muslims are dealt with when they marry outside the faith to infidels. Not only that, what about an intermarriage with Jews, those their Quran (Koran) deem no better than “apes and pigs?”

Sura 7:166 – But when even after this they disdainfully persisted in that from which they were forbidden, We said to them, “Become apes—despised and disgraced!” (Maududi)

Sura 2:65 – And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all.” 66 Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people. (Maududi)

Sura 5:60 – Then say: “Should I inform you [People of the Book] of those, who will have even worse recompense from Allah than the transgressors? They are those whom Allah has cursed; who have been under His wrath; some of whom were turned into apes and swine; who worshipped taghut [the devil or idols]; those are the people who are in a far worse plight and who have turned farthest away from the Right Way.” (Maududi)….etc.

READERS, are you detecting a pattern, as to how Islam depicts Jews? If not, know this:

Question: Why does Islam not allow Muslim women to marry Christian or Jewish men while it allows vice versa?

Answer: If a Jewish or Christian girl marries a Muslim, she may rest assured that none of the persons who are holy to her will ever be spoken of irreverently among her new family; while, on the other hand, should a Muslim girl marry a non-Muslim, it is certain that he whom she regards as God’s Messenger will be abused… and perhaps even by her own children: for do not children usually follow their father’s faith? Dost thou think it would be fair to expose her to such a pain and humiliation?’

(Muhammad Asad, The Road to Mecca, 1985, Dar Al-Andalus, Gibraltar. pp 186-187)

THUS, if we are to assume that Huma is a female, yet she married a Jew and had his child too, isn’t it VERY clear that she VIOLATED a basic tenet from the Quran? Concomitantly, isn’t it also the case that her family, a highly religious and prominent one within Saudi Arabia, the Wahhabi Kingdom – their history can be accessed here – would have disowned her or worse? 

It is not permissible for a Muslim woman to marry a kaafir (non-Muslim), whether he is Jewish, Christian or an idol-worshipper, because the man has authority over his wife, and it is not permissible for a kaafir to have authority over a Muslim woman. For Islam is the true religion and all other religions are false. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al-Mushrikoon till they believe (in Allaah Alone)” [al-Baqarah 2:221]

“And never will Allaah grant to the disbelievers a way (to triumph) over the believers” [al-Nisaa’ 4:141]

And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Islam should prevail and should not be prevailed over.”

If a Muslim woman marries a kaafir when she knows the ruling, then she is a zaaniyah (adulteress), and her punishment is the punishment for adultery. {blogger’s note: the deadly punishment for adultery is here}

Muslim (17:4192) – This hadith clarifies the different penalties for adultery (when the subjects are married), and fornication (when they are not): “in case of married (persons) there is (a punishment) of one hundred lashes and then stoning (to death). And in case of unmarried persons, (the punishment) is one hundred lashes and exile for one year” (See also 17:4191)

If she was ignorant of the ruling then she is excused, but they must be separated, and there is no need for a divorce because the marriage is null and void. On this basis, the Muslim woman whom Allaah has honoured with Islam and her guardian must beware of that and must adhere to the limits set by Allaah, and they must feel proud of Islam. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Those who take disbelievers for Awliyaa’ (protectors or helpers or friends) instead of believers, do they seek honour, power and glory with them? Verily, then to Allaah belongs all honour, power and glory” [al-Nisaa’ 4:139]

RESULTANT, according to this recap, isn’t Huma Abedin being given “special” dispensation? Of course. The question becomes two-fold: by whom, and to what end?

Saudi Arabia isn’t just governed by a strict interpretation of sharia law. It prohibits the public practice of any other religion; it is also Judenrein. Apostasy is considered much worse than being a Jew and is worthy of death. A Muslim woman marrying a Jew is about the most unspeakable crime a Saudi woman can commit. That is what makes the recent trip of close Hillary Clinton adviser Huma Abedin to Saudi Arabia quite inexplicable if she is not a spy for the Muslim Brotherhood. Joining Huma in what should have been seen as a dishonor to the family was Huma’s sister Heba Abedin.

Instead, Huma traveled to Saudi Arabia without fear of death for her crime.

Despite being married to Anthony Weiner (a Jew), Huma Abedin (a Muslim) was allowed to travel to Saudi Arabia to witness her mother Saleha being honored by Dar al-Hekma University, where Saleha works as a Vice Dean. As a leader with the Muslim Sisterhood, Saleha should have been dishonored by her daughter’s marriage four years ago. Yet, Huma is permitted to attend the honoring of her Muslim Sisterhood mother at a Muslim fundamentalist University.

Once again we see evidence that Huma is an agent of the Brotherhood, not the innocent, moderate Muslim she is portrayed as being….

According to the Saudi brand of Sharia law, Huma dishonored her family when she married Weiner. At a minimum, she should have been disowned by the family. That she was not means that the family dishonored itself. In other words, Saleha and Heba further dishonored the family. Since Dar al-Hekma decided to honor Saleha anyway means that the University dishonored itself.

Of course, all of this is forgiven if Huma is practicing Muruna by using the tactic known as the Doctrine of Balance.

TO wit, know their Islamic tactics well, your very lives depend on this knowledge base! In essence, in order to understand what is going on under the radar, taqiyya, kitman, tawriya, muruna, etc. are the places to commence your journey. Get busy.

IN all inherent aspects, Huma Abedin, via the following “dossier” (as well as enumerable others) is “hiding in plain sight.”

MOST significantly, while she has access to the deepest repository of America’s national security secrets – never mind that she is no longer “employed” by the State Dept. – she enjoys the protective shield of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Bonnie and Clyde Clinton, scores of Beltway power brokers, and the entire Brotherhood apparatus! Whoa, Nellie.

NOW, you tell this investigative journalist: does it get any more dangerous than that?

AND, as an exercise in journalistic curiosity, the captured media should (but they won’t) ask Huma the following “yes or no” queries with no hemming and hawing in between: is she “for or against” what the latest female jihadi (from Colorado) tried to do, as “Jihad Shannon” attempted to board a flight from Denver International Airport to Turkey, not as a sightseer, but to join up with the Islamic State? If not, why not?

INDEED, the above questions (begging for answers) should just get the (media) ball rolling !

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}