Once in a while a double header emerges, one which points the way to much of the surrounding chaos. Such is the case with two videos highlighted at Western Center For Journalism. A reliable font of info. Deemed “kosher” by this blog’s contacts, in case anyone is interested.
In general, dedicated readers of this Zionist & Conservative blog address are a particular type of audience – the non-intimidated kind. However, surely there are folks whose constitutions can hardly bear so much negative news, whether referred to the site, or having stumbled onto its pages. Sorry for that, but current events is hardly under a single person’s control or purview.
That being said, keep in mind the following, just in order to catch up to the latest. For those who are duly informed, your indulgence is appreciated.
Incessant alarms have been ringing, detailing the unprecedented, inexplicable ammo purchased by “mama Janet’s” Homeland Security. Enough to prepare for decades of war inside the U.S. – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/….pray tell, against whom?
Miracle of miracles, even some in Washington are taking note – “Those of us watching Obama closely know that he promised to create and arm a new domestic army equivalent to the military. It has been happening right under Congresses nose without a peep. Now finally we see some concern. We can only hope this concern is sincere and won’t disappear when NJ Congressman Leonard Lance returns to DC” - www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-congressman-dhs-must-explain-ammunition-and-armored-vehicle-purchases/.
In concert, the U.S.’s leading lawbreaker, AG Eric Holder, reluctantly (and only after Rep Rand Paul’s filibuster) walked back from his claim that it was “legal” to use drones against American’s on U.S. soil, even as the regime affords due process to foreign enemy combatants. Apparently, terrorists fighting the U.S. on foreign soil are not barred from having their say in U.S. courts, instead of where they should be adjudicated, that is, within military tribunals - adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/09/legalizing-drone-strikes-within-america-targeting-american-citizens-more-than-meets-the-eye-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Therefore, the “rights” of foreign terrorists takes precedence over U.S. citizens, at least according to the Radical-in-Chief & surrogates.
In “Obama’s America”, American citizens are treated like gum under their shoes, disposable at will. Besides, even though there are countless anti-American Americans in need of due punishment, isn’t due process a part of every American’s Constitutional rights? Until now.
Onto Video Number One -
‘U.S. Government Preparing For Collapse?’
Take a moment and breathe deeply. Video Number Two is its companion and embedded below.
‘Drones Will Target Conservative Americans’
For many of us, Rand Paul’s filibuster was a surreal moment in time, beckoning back to better days when Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was considered a masterpiece of film because it embodied the values of our nation. Today, “violence porn” films like Django Unchained are considered the top of the heap because they, sadly, embody our corrupt and violent society.
But this wasn’t some manufactured issue, as the Left is famous for. Michael Isakoff uncovered a secret DOJ memo last month that gave the Obama administration the authority to kill any U.S. citizen, at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one.
And in fact, Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, was taken out by a drone for basically being a propagandist for Al-Qaeda. Whether, being an American citizen, he should have been given due process is debatable. But two weeks after al-Awlaki was killed, his sixteen year old son,Abdulrahman, also an American citizen, was killed with a drone. His crime was being related to an identified terrorist. And in fact, then-Obama spokesman Robert Gibbs blamed al-Awlaki’s son for “not having a more responsible father” for his being vaporized by a missile.
And then there was the news that the Obama administration had ordered a fleet of “public safety”drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not—with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles. Experts estimate this fleet of “public safety” drones to reach 30,000 by the end of Obama’s “third term.”
This in itself would have remained innocuous enough, but there was this odd “War on Domestic Terrorism” that the Obama administration was waging against conservatives.
This of course sounds very much like beliefs espoused by conservatives, specifically the Tea Party, so it was valid for conservatives to be concerned.
Rand Paul, more pointedly, cited in his filibuster further ludicrous “behaviors” of potential domestic terrorists: Those who have guns with high capacity magazines and weatherized ammunition. Those who have more than a seven day supply of food. Those who pay in cash. And probably the most ludicrous: Those who are missing fingers.
It took almost two months for the American people to get a straight answer from the Obama administration as to whether an American citizen can be killed on American soil with a drone for being a potential terrorist.
Obama refused to answer the question. CIA appointee John Brennan, prompted by the Senate Judiciary Committee, refused to answer. Attorney General Eric Holder initially stated that it was constitutional in a letter to Senator Rand Paul. But when pressed by Senator Cruz, after equivocating for several minutes, Holder finally admitted that no, the Obama administration couldnot constitutionally kill an American citizen on American soil with a drone—though he never states this directly.
This was the impetus for Rand Paul’s thirteen hour filibuster of the John Brennan nomination, which finally resulted in the Obama administration sending a terse and extremely vague letter to Rand Paul, supposedly clarifying its position.
The letter states:
It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.
Of course, the question is, what does the Obama administration consider “combat”? This was not addressed; and more than likely, Obama, like everything else surrounding his drone program, will keep this under wraps.
John Brennan, who is in charge of the Obama administration’s drone program abroad, will no doubt become the de facto head of the domestic “public safety” drone program. All able to nullify the Fourth Amendment and spy on Americans. All able to determine whether a potential “domestic terrorist” is armed. All able to fire a missile, vaporizing an American sitting in a cafe, minding his own business, deemed by Barack Hussein Obama to be engaged in “combat.”
After all, the regime is preparing for what they know is an inevitable outcome. Why shouldn’t millions of Americans put forth their best efforts, possibly knocking them off their game plan?
Better than the alternative.
UPDATE: ‘Socialists ready to make power grab of world citizens’ money’